Polling is being used and manipulated to aid the professional political apparatus in their efforts to eliminate the threat that is Donald Trump. The sheer scope of the antagonistic efforts toward that end is remarkable. However, Donald Trump has a strategy to cut through the smokescreen – more on that after the PPP Poll.
Public Policy Polling has released a poll of Virginia voters (full pdf below). Everyone knows PPP leans left and they don’t try to hide their bias – that’s ok, we don’t have any issue with ideological polling so long as there is accompanying honesty.
As long as the bias is open and admitted, and as long as the methodology and cross tabs are fully disclosed, the reader can adjust their perspective accordingly – and that’s why we find PPP polls useful.
The sample within the poll is gender skewed toward polled female voters by 8%. 54/46
A traditional poll model would be 51(fem)/49(male). Against that methodology skew the resulting poll outcome is:

Public Policy Polling surveyed 1,032 registered voters from June 13th to 15th. The race is close and within the polls margin of error – and if you consider the gender skew, the race is essentially tied.
However, on a profoundly optimistic note – despite a constant media drum beat of negativism toward Trump – with independent Virginia voters Donald Trump does remarkably better than Hillary Clinton.
(more…)
(Statement Via Donald Trump) Sadly with this endorsement of Hillary Clinton – who is totally owned by Wall Street – the leadership of the AFL-CIO has made clear that it no longer represents American workers. Instead they have become part of the rigged system in Washington, D.C. that benefits only the insiders.
I believe their members will be voting for me in much larger numbers than for her.
Hillary Clinton and her husband have made hundreds of millions of dollars doing favors and selling access to Wall Street, special interests and oppressive foreign regimes.
As Bernie Sanders said, “Why, over her political career, has Wall Street been the major campaign contributor to Hillary Clinton?” They own Hillary Clinton and she will do whatever they tell her to.
Bernie Sanders is also 100% correct when he says that Hillary Clinton “vote[d] for virtually every trade agreement that has cost the workers of this country millions of jobs.” Hillary supported NAFTA and she supported the trade deal with China, Vietnam, South Korea – and if elected will implement the TPP she loves so much – guaranteed. (more…)
According to information from the office of Senator Ron Johnson (Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs) terrorist Omar Mateen was posting messages to social media in the time between the initial attack and the time SWAT teams rushed the Pulse nightclub:

“I pledge my alliance to (ISIS leader) abu bakr al Baghdadi … may Allah accept me”.
“The real muslims will never accept the filthy ways of the west” …“You kill innocent women and children by doing us airstrikes … now taste the Islamic state vengeance.”
Last night Fox News Sean Hannity interviewed candidate Donald Trump. The primary topic discussed was the Orlando terrorist attack and the threat from Islamic Jihadists. Additional topics included media dishonesty and the race against Hillary Clinton:
(more…)
This coming Sunday Fareed Zakaria (CNN) will broadcast an interview with Russian leader Vladimir Putin; that might actually be worth paying attention to… this Bloomberg Poll, well, not-so-much.
The poll is not even worth using the bandwidth to create the pdf (you can see it here), because just like all Bloomberg polls, they are 100% pure agenda driven nonsense.
To give you evidence in that regard the last Bloomberg poll, the same Bloomberg poll, taken three months ago showed Clinton 54 / Trump 36.

Go figure.
You’ll note the CTH has never posted a Bloomberg Poll, because the pollsters who work for Bloomberg are 100% ideologues and don’t try to hide their agenda. Even left-leaning PPP pollsters make fun of Bloomberg Polls. (more…)
CNN calls this: “The commander in chief’s fury, which seethed out of him in a stunning soliloquy on live television, amounted to a moment of historic significance: a president castigating one of the two people who could succeed him as beyond the constitutional and political norms of the nation itself.”
However, what’s more evident is how Donald Trump’s criticism of the weak and ineffective security policies of President Obama is directly on target. The Orlando massacre is a visible outcome of the current president’s ineffective anti-terrorism policies.
Obama’s policies are in the sunlight; he is scared, diminished and lashing out:
The common sense America-First candidacy of Donald Trump is revealing the true dangers to ordinary Americans. (more…)
Listed below is a comparative graph, (from FEC records), showing the number of people on the campaign payrolls of: Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump over the past thirteen months:

Obviously there are a few interpretations possible for what this data signifies. However, two of the more obvious points would be:
- Two of the three candidates represented have never held executive management responsibility in the private sector where they needed to worry about labor efficiency.
- Two of the three candidates have never needed to make a payroll, or be personally accountable for the financial viability of their endeavors. Their only budget familiarity is spending other peoples money.
It is not too challenging to identify which two candidates would be unfamiliar with labor costs, budgeting and efficiency. In addition which candidate do you think would be more apt to focus on the elimination of bloated bureaucratic government, and waste?
(more…)
ABC is reporting on this –SEE HERE– but notice they would not be reporting on it if Citizens United Group wasn’t providing the documents and forcing them to cover it.
(Link to ABC Report and Documents)
(more…)

“subtlety”, “nuance”, “twitches”, “tremors”, “fine tuning”, these the less visible notations a researcher can find when they look into the quiet data the smart-set stroll past.
However, that said, when the New York Times is noticed shuffling around in the same data sets, you just know they are attempting to quantify the reality behind the stats the MSM consistently, and fraudulently, represent. In addition, when they stop looking over their shoulder and begin polishing off the dirt from the glowing nugget, well,.. they wouldn’t be standing next to us if they didn’t suspect we were mining in a more lucrative locale.
CTH readers already know the scope of the research we’ve put into this election. Our spidey senses also anticipate a certain republican candidate has previously invested in a very similar endeavor. Indeed, it would be impossible for us to predict so accurately were it not for an accidental synergy and ideological alignment therein.
In a rare admission today, the New York Times is walking back over 10 years of prior demographic presentations regarding the U.S. electorate. In essence what they are saying is the voting base is far less ethnically diverse and far more white than historic leftist presentations.
Oh my.
(more…)
After a one hour meeting with Bernie Sanders today, President Obama officially endorsed Hillary Clinton via the release of a well produced video.
However, White House spokesman Josh Earnest accidentally let it slip the video was recorded last Tuesday – BEFORE California, New Jersey, Montana, New Mexico and South Dakota even held their primary elections.
The “D’oh” moment is at the end of this video clip:
Yes, it appears the scripted Associated Press release on Monday and the White House recording on Tuesday is the final evidence Bernie was never going to be allowed. Earnest admitting the endorsement video was recorded before the votes being counted on Tuesday is just salt in an open wound.
The reality of a rehearsed, produced, and heavily scripted roll out of Hillary Clinton as the presumptive nominee is yet another example of how Senator Bernie Sanders never stood a chance. The professional DNC machine was always going to anoint Hillary Clinton.
(more…)