This sounds absolutely nuts to me, but the U.K police have released on bail the five suspected terrorists caught outside RAF Fairford military base. Assistant Commissioner Laurence Taylor delivered a statement outside Scotland Yard explaining the current status. WATCH:
“We have, as you would expect, ensured that our protective security advice and posture remain commensurate to the threat. But be assured, we are considering this from every possible angle, including that this may be actively committed by proxies or individuals, either knowingly or unknowingly, working on behalf of a foreign state.“
According to the UK Daily Mirror, “The farmer who told police about the suspected RAF Fairford terror plot has claimed she saw up to 10 masked people by the base – as police said five men arrested will be bailed. The woman, in her 50s, from Whelford, alerted police after seeing three vans blocking a road near the base, which has been used by the US to bomb missile sites in Iran, while on her way back from a party. Five British nationals were then arrested in the early hours of Sunday morning on suspicion of explosives offences and later terrorism. The farmer who dialed 999 has now claimed there were “definitely more than five” and estimated she saw between eight and 10 people with their faces covered and wearing “slim-fitting clothes”. {source}
UK NEWS – Five men arrested over a suspected bomb plot near an RAF base have been released on bail, the Metropolitan Police has said.
The suspects, who are all British nationals aged in their twenties and from London, were arrested over potential terror offences in Whelford, Gloucestershire, in the early hours of Sunday.
They were arrested on suspicion of explosives offences and later on suspicion of terrorism offences, after a villager dialed 999 when she saw three vans and a group of masked men near the base.
Dozens of homes had to be evacuated as bomb disposal teams were called in and a cordon remains in place. Home secretary Shabana Mahmood said on Monday afternoon that Whelford residents will shortly be able to return home.
Assistant commissioner Laurence Taylor told reporters outside New Scotland Yard: “I can confirm that following extensive interviews and inquiries, the five men who were arrested are being released on police bail this afternoon.
“To be very clear, this does not mean that the investigation is over. They are subject to stringent conditions on their movement and contact with others. They absolutely remain under investigation as we explore multiple lines of inquiry.”
The five suspects are a 24-year-old from Camden, north London; three men aged 23, 24 and 25 from Westminster, central London; and one man aged 24 from Willesden, north-west London. (read more)
so was it a false flag operation to blame it on the Russians to start WW III?
No. It was the religion of peace trying to show the world how peaceful they are.
I wonder how many are named Abdul?
More like Ivan, Bohdan or Mykola.
Come on, they were ‘British nationals’. s/
All of the ones not named Mohammed?
2 were named Abdul, 2 Mohammeds, 1 Barrack
Mohammed by a nose. 😉
The coordination, the manipulation and the lies are so easy to spot if you are willing to put aside all the lies and conditioning you have been bombarded without your consent your whole life.
Most of you don’t and can’t (not mad at y’all it’s human nature and life long conditioning is an incredibly effective tool) understand.
I’m grateful that every younger generation now see the system for what it is. Entire generations of red pilled men and women who see the world for what it is. The abuse ends with us. This is why the socialist/communist scare won’t work.
I always tell my clients that about my competitors: “Ask them to prove it. Talk is cheap.”
That’s the energy we all move forward with (left, right, populist, socialist).
Prove it. Actions over words. You no longer get to abuse us the way you abused our parents and made them into mindless zombies.
I am not a “Day of the Pillow” guy, but I am looking forward to Boomers being humbled to their core. As your favorite Fox News personality says” Tick Tock.
We are going to burn it down.
You know where to go with your boomer schtik
What does this rant have to do with the UK letting suspected terrorists out on bail?
Btw, your generation can’t tell the difference between men and women so…
Well John, hate to break it to ya, but we arent going anywhere.
Your misplaced rantings seem a tad bit weird. You ok or?
Why would you come here to spew stupidity about boomers, in this thread? Or this place?
That dog dont hunt, hoss.
A second look at the partying farmer girl?
With “friends” like the UK who needs enemies
You can have cold anger at this. Bail for these guys, but the guy that took action to slash one of the boats has been denied bail.
Then watch this and take heart – Kate Hopkins, a true warrior, speaking out: https://x.com/KTHopkins/status/2103650917241553334?s=20
She’s a very brave soul.
Please God protect her and all who are standing up for good.
✝️🫂🙏
False flag op busted.
You get it Max. The question is do you understand who initiated this Op. This is where it gets fun. All I can do is provide bread crumbs.
okay so this would be normal practice (to release on bond) IF
there was no actual criminal violation.
there were no arms, weapons, explosives or some form of evidence indicating harm was being planned and that evidence is tied to this group…something more than heresay. Actual physical or electronic evidence.
the “crew” was afforded right to remain silent and not self implicate.
the attorney’s representing them made a preliminary appeal before the judge with conditions for their release (no travel and possibly with ankle monitors and police surveillance sequestering these mooslems to housing that would be monitored)
so lets talk about this.
there did not actually commit any terrorism. no actual damage or harm to anyone other than screwing up traffic in a rural area in the witches hour and perhaps trespass (if the private owner of that property decides to file a complaint)
we really don’t know what was in the vans. (as someone taspok?) replied to an earlier post, this may have been some sort of penetration test, or a diversion. In either case, without actual weapons explosives or equipment to cut through fencing or rope to climb or ladder and such, there is no provable evidence that a court would entertain that rise to a criminal violation and certainly not a terror charge.
these men, for better of for worse, are in fact innocent UNLESS they are proven guilty.
Whether or not they were released with conditions, is unknown to me, but I mention it was speculation as to why a judge would permit bond.
stay tuned. This case is probably going to take some weird and strange turns. more than the 96 hour rule applies, I would guess.
now it is going to be litigated.
what remains are the obvious questions, why police forces were not actively patrolling at all hours given the airbase was on heightened alert. That makes no sense to me. You set up roadblocks. You knock on doors and ask for the community to be on the alert and to form neighborhood relations so that something doesn’t look right, calls are made and police respond. I can’t imagine a heightened alert posture that does not require at least a 24.7 series of patrols all around the area. It’s unlikely that roadblocks could not have been set up and you screen all vehicles leading to roads into and around the area.
this is a failure of alert posture. This is how people get blown up.
God Bless America
I would add we can’t assume anything the gov’t officially says about the case is the truth. For example, if gov’t says no guns, no explosives etc., we can’t accept that as true.
Official gov’t positions are rarely the truth.
After watching many videos from Susan Kokinda and Barbara Boyd-and absorbing the lessons-I think I can say with a high degree of certainty that this operation has London’s fingerprints all over it.
Odd in that there has been no mention of guns, bombs, or even knives, that I’ve heard.
The other thing about this is that these suspects keep getting called “British Nationals” and according to the UK web, that term has to do with overseas and Hong Kong.
“Someone who was a British overseas territories citizen (previously British dependent territories citizen)”
What British dependent territory are they referring to?
For people wondering about security at the RAF Fairford, the site of the thwarted attack on US assets in the UK. The articles published by the MSM … CUT OUT parts of the interview of the female witness.
The witness (a local resident) stated, that the base has been under lockdown and heightened security for weeks. The B-1 bombers had already departed.
The use of anything approaching deadly force by US Base Security for anything but self-defense “response” or ON THE BASE itself is likely to be highly restricted by the SOFA (Status of Forces Agreement) between the US and U … that defines US Forces Authority and Authority to use Force.
It is also telling that it was UK Police and not a UK INTEL nor Military Asset that responded.
It is not so simple as placing assets on a base, even a leased base in a foreign nation. especially ones that are now NOT our Friends and NEED AN INCIDENT vs a US asset. There ARE and will be limits.
Major USAF Assets: 501st Combat Support Wing, 420th Air Base Squadron, 420th Munitions Squadron, and the 99th Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron as well as actual USAF Combat Squadrons that pass through the base. Digging through the composition of the USAF Units at RAF Fairford … I cannot identify anything that looks like a major facility defense-security related asset as part of the units listed.
It is highly possible, if not likely, that the UK RAF is responsible for Physical Security of the Base. This is not an unusual arrangement for US Forces station overseas. That also is a major worry in my mind.
Of interest is that the Mission of the Units at this particular base and the assets that pass through it are NOT NATO related. Just an interesting consideration, which may have impacted the “amount of security” allowed or allocated by the UK at this base as well as it’s choice as a Target.
From what I can determine, this base supports:
The Ukraine (what a surprise, not … Storyline = Russia did it)
The Operations in the Middle East (Storyline = Iran, aided by the Russians did it)
The Operations in Africa
Perhaps not unusual but if the security is not up to par then someone needs to investigate. I imagine SecWar Hegseth is on this as well speak.
The most historic city in the world “London” fell the day they installed a radical Muslim and calling these terrorist “Nationals” is proof London has fallen.
The British government would have absolutely no problem had this plan gone further and blown up American planes.
Does “Suspicion” of explosives mean they actually had explosives or is this a UK MI6 plot ?
3 vans. There were more than 5
Had to make room for the racist woman who called them in.