I cannot imagine being a “man” in the lives of any of these women. Whether husband or son or brother, what a nutless depressed sullen neutered miserable existence must it be for these eunuchs.

I submit these so called nurses have been involved in murdering hundreds of patients. This is the only way that gaggle of witches would say how the holdout juror, “had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.” !

These jurors were not sequestered, so they went home to their families (or their cats) at the end of every day. Just a guess, but what if Mr holdout juror went home to a based, feminine, moral woman who really helped him with his principles and convictions, to prepare for the onslaught he was up against every day.

My wife joked that she would divorce me if I voted to acquit. But seriously, we would have had pretty deep conversations about a great many things.

I have a reasonable doubt about the sanity of these women jurors.

The Western White ‘Woman’ has become completely unrecognizable these days. It would do a properly raised young man to search elsewhere for wife material. Feminism is poison.

Isaiah 5:20-21
20: Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
21: Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!

The reason for men to protect women is that they are the only ones that can have children.
If now it became legal to abort at five years of age men will not want to carry their duties.

Stand With the Juror | GiveSendGo

Just thought I’d park this here. Because heroes are in short supply nowadays.

1 Timothy 2:

‘ 8 I desire therefore that the men pray everywhere, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and doubting; 9 in like manner also, that the women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with propriety and moderation, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or costly clothing, 10 but, which is proper for women professing godliness, with good works. 11 Let a woman learn in silence with all submission. 12 And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence. 13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve. 14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression. 15 Nevertheless she will be saved in childbearing if they continue in faith, love, and holiness, with self-control. ‘

(NKJV)

Notes:

Verse 8 tells us that the scope is “everywhere”, not just in the corporate church sanctuary on Sunday as most contemporary interpretations try to limit it.

Paul alludes to the more gullible nature of women vs. men, ‘ 14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression. ‘

There are exceptions, but in general it is true about women. The biblical model is that men and women are complementary, not superior/inferior in all things. America and the West sought to override this with individualism in the 20th century, the shift accelerating with oral contraceptives and “the sexual revolution” in the 1960’s and 70’s onward with economic pressures driving women into the corporate workforce in the 1970s onward.

Thus America and the West sowed the seeds of their own destruction with “feminism” elevating women to power over men.

Some suggest that there was more than meets the eye in this:

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/how-the-elite-used-cia-asset-gloria

Convergence of interests in doubling the labor pool and consumption to drive corporatism and profit, with government gaining power in indoctrinating children and other aspects of the breakdown of the family.

The Lindsay Clancy atrocity and “trial” illuminate the natural ends of these shifts.

He did what had to be done.

As a lifelong Bostonian, I would like to add that if I knew who this (holdout) juror who “had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children”was…..I would buy the guy a beer. Several, as a matter of fact….

The larger story in this trial, in my mind, is the defense attorney’s egregious attack on the entire American jury system. He actually wanted the holdout juror replaced because, according to him, the reluctant juror was not abiding by the judge’s jury instructions on reasonable doubt. This contention is already halfway down the proverbial slippery slope. Add in the jury’s all to eager willingness to ignore intent when the murderer sent her husband to the store and then strangled 3 innocent children reveals their ability to ignore all the evidence in their rush to accept a psychotic defense.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/lindsay-clancy-supporters-threaten-father-children-she-murdered

The father subjected to ‘… a relentless, escalating and destructive defamation campaign…’

Doesn’t that describe the common MO of women?

Not just viciousness to harm and manipulate and dominate father, but in general? (As evidenced by e.g. sororities.)

Who approved that jury? I can’t believe that these three specimens of liberal femininity didn’t have a social media footprint that led directly back to past posts that would have disqualified them.

Having recently talked with young people about this awful case, I firmly believe that there is a tarnished silver lining, to this blackest of clouds. though. These women’s reactions will have reinforced a growing belief amongst the next generation that something has gone badly wrong, and that liberal attitudes are largely to blame.

I came away from this conversations both saddened, because they’ve been denied a childhood that other generations had, but hopeful because they’re becoming highly skilled at navigating through DS propaganda, as they search for the truth.

Twelve Angry Men….except now it’s eleven women…..I would question the mentality of the prosecution that accepted eleven female nurses in the jury. It’s almost like the prosecution was looking for a post partum result.

Interestingly, when I was on a jury years ago (second degree murder case), we were told explicitly not to use any special knowledge we might have to influence the deliberations. So, unless that instruction is particular to my state, probably the nurses should not have been talking about the drugs that Clancy did or didn’t have on board–unless it was to repeat testimony.

those crappy old women. some poor guy’s mother in law. get the hell away from the crazy. cut ’em off. they’ll never learn. born and die stupid.

These women need to be ostracized. It’s the only way to reach their peak brains. Good moral people must react in disgust and cut them out of society.

Way too much sensationalism for me. She’s not the first mom to murder her children and will not be the last.

Unspeakable amorality.

Ugly, I’ll bet alone, and raging at the sky. Karma is coming for thee.

Not ALL nurses and not ALL teachers. Post partum depression is real. Side effects from prescribed medications are real. Male medical manipulation is real. I did not hear the evidence. The mother’s flat, emotionless face is shown on television.

The deaths of those darling children is heartbreaking and evil. The ongoing pain of their father is palpable-just from observing the video. Since I was not at the trial, I cannot assess the quality of the evidence-either side.

• I left the nursing profession after witnessing my colleagues- pediatric intensive care registered nurses- participate in Jay Tarnow, MD’s “experiment” of shocking any of a small toddler’s 4 limbs (3 1/2 year old girl) to stop her from pulling her trachea tube out causing her alarms to go off and creating a lot of bedside attention to reestablish her airway. This little imp was strapped down-all 4 limbs restrained, trying to break free. Only 2 nurses in the 18 bed unit (who successfully cared for her unrestrained through nursing shifts) refused to participate in this experiment despite my publicly pointing out to Dr. Tarnow that Skinner’s research had established that punishment never changed behavior. Only 2 of us refused to participate in shocking this toddler. The “experiment” had to be halted because this little girl had burns on her limbs from the nurses shocking her after 3 days . They had not checked her skin for the harm they had done. They had burned her skin under the electrodes. The “experiment” was halted. I left that hospital, took the LSATs and started night law school months later. (I still had student loans to pay off).
• Thus, I was extremely angry but not surprised after I watched the capitulation of the medical and nursing community to the very unscientific scamdemic and the genocidal rollout of the experimental mRNA gene therapy deliberately misnamed a “vaccine”. Millions were injured and millions died. Of course, alternative treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were effectively outlawed. (Walgreens in Florida still will not fill a prescription for Ivermectin). There is no “Emergency Use Authorization” for a “new drug” if the is treatment that works. Nuremberg 2.0 trials are necessary for those participants. This is where our attention should be focused,imo.

Big pharma’s next ad disclaimer in very fine print barely legible will read, may cause suicidal tendencies or thoughts of murdering children.

I won’t post a comment because my last comment listing the psychotic drugs Lindsay Clancy was prescribed was not allowed to be posted (twice) by CTH. Very disappointing.

The foreperson was “excited” to fill out the non guilty forms? Excited?

It is hoped the prosecutor would take serious consideration of the information provided in this interview, shaping their efforts towards targeting the perpetrators conscious and premeditated actions and the minutes by minute decisions made within the heinous acts.

I’m sure he was the only juror that was unvaxed!

He had a hard time getting off the fact that she viciously killed her children? Ummm isn’t that the point of the trial? She committed murder, how are you judging her act without including the act itself?

Yeah, I wouldn’t “get off that fact” either.

You just said in that interview that she “viciously killed her children.” Yet, you were determined to declare her “NOT guilty,” and set her free. In the jury room, you insisted that she was blameless. Yet, in a public interview, you just said the opposite.

I had the hardest time with knowing she sent her husband out on a timed chore and even talked calmly when he called. That was the very definition of premeditated. Crazy is not calculated!

Lindsey was the monster under her kids beds. This is why progressive women and blacks should never be in positions of authority. They’ve become a protected class that can, literally, get away with murder.

These karen demons need some jail time.

There are a lot of sick people in Massachusetts.

A change of venue to a more rural location. Dismiss all medical and teaching people as potential jurors to get an unbiased jury.

The scary part of this clip is the reporter saying how she came away after the interview with three women that our jury systems is the best. Well reporter as you try and promote these three glory hound jurors and their righteousness why arent you disgusted, ticked off that three innocent little children lost their lives at the hand of the defendant a.k.a their Mother? There is no reasonable doubt about that! BSC ladies for sure!

Remember when women wore white and clamored for the vote?

Remember when we could still hang women for poisoning people?

I live in Northern California and there are many older, harsh seeming, white liberal women here. The younger women seem less severe, even sweet usually. But middle age brings on the anger.
There are so many liberals here, in fact, that I do not often discuss politics with my neighbors.

My older sister goes along with the liberals, although she does not seem passionate about these viewpoints. She goes along to get along. I would say she just accepts what the main stream media feeds her. Her mindset always surprises me.

Many men have told my husband that he is lucky his wife is not a lefty. Most men around here who aren’t married have to toe the line to get into a relationship.
It is a terrible situation really.

I would love to see a real investigation of all the cellphones of the jurors and the defense “attorney” during the time of the deliberations. Imo, any and all communications from any of the jurors to anyone during that time period is suspect and needs to be followed up on. Any one of them could have been using a “third party” to relay info to the defense. There is no way for the defense to have known from the notes that the jury was 11-1 to acquit. The one note gave the juror number of the holdout but to my knowledge did not mention the type of verdict the 11 were in favor of.

If those poor little kids had been dogs do you think those people would have felt different about her……of course

What you are looking at are 3 AWFUL’s who also are part of public unions. Big part of Democrat base.

The part left unsaid … the defense failed to demonstrate that Clancy was mentally incapable “when she brutally murdered her children.

These 3-women are putting words into the mouth of the “hold out juror” and omitting parts of as well as twisting the whole explanation of the “holdout juror’s” explanation. (i.e. the “holdout juror” understood reasonable doubt but it was not actually established by the defense in the mid of the “holdout juror”).

Religion against religion.
Nation against nation.
Neighbor against neighbor.
Race against race.
Sex against sex.
Perversion against decency.
Parents against children.
Satan and his disciples are working overtime.

Vicious. adjective
Mean-spirited or deliberately hurtful; malicious.
vicious gossip.
Extremely violent or injurious; cruel.
a vicious blow to the stomach; vicious tactics in suppressing a rebellion.
Marked by an aggressive disposition. Used chiefly of animals.

how any person could get around that fact is puzzling to me.

Nothing twinkled the prosecutor’s spidey senses during selection – like, wow we sure have a lot of level 5 lunatics here. One or two you can expect but this coven.

Different scenario – could you sentence someone to death? Oh’s no, that’s mean. Bounced from pool.
Here – could you find someone guilty of murder who admits to killing her 3 kids? NFW, that’s a mother’s choice.

He held fast to his principles. That’s becoming less and less common. Principles are becoming “squishy.” 😢

They can say all this with a straight face!!! They all women-splained to him but he couldn’t get past the fact that she had viciously killed her three children! Well, DUH!!!

Someone should use AI and make a video of a women killing three toddlers while the others watched in horror as the mother strangled the life out of them. Please! Make that video. And then let those who side with the mass murderer watch it until they understand.

This is not rocket surgery; it is a binary problem.
Did Lindsay Clancey kill her children?
If so, is she competent?
If so, prison for life, or death. If not, incarcerated for life in a mental institution.
If Lindsay Clancey did not kill her children, acquit her.
A jury of random high school students could have done a better job than these twits.
The ACT, regardless of circumstances, constitutes the offense.

How a ‘string’ of dreadful, irrational and troubling ‘acts’ were cured long ways back in history – it involved, it concerned the young women of Miletus (in Greece, I think.) Here is the whole story:

One time the young women of Miletus were afflicted by a dreadful and irrational trouble, of uncertain origin. It was suggested that the atmosphere had become polluted with an ecstatic concoction and poisonous character and so caused them to lose control of their senses. For suddenly all of them were seized with a desire to commit suicide, and there was an insane rush to hang themselves, and many managed to hang themselves before they could be stopped. 

Neither their parents’ arguments nor tears nor their friends’ advice got through to them, but the got round every plot and trick their watchers could devise in order to destroy themselves.

The affliction appeared to have been sent by some god, and to be more than human ability could handle, until the time when a sensible man proposed an ordinance that the women who hung themselves must be carried naked through the market-place in their funeral procession.

This ordinance, once approved, not only prevented, but completely stopped the young women from hanging themselves. Precaution against ill repute is a clear indication of goodness and virtue, and the women who were not afraid of the most dreadful of all possibilities, death and suffering, could not bring themselves to bear the thought of the disgrace that would come to them after their deaths. (source)

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐲 is an adverb that means acting in a cruel, violent, or intensely malicious way with 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭 to hurt or upset someone.