Speaking without a prepared script or teleprompter, here is the transcript from Secretary of State Marco Rubio speech to the Foundry School.
We either reindustrialize our national economy, moving completely away from the ‘service driven’ narrative of years past, or we will forever consign ourselves to economic servitude. This is also the American ideological perspective that undeniably affirms our baseline reason for cutting ties with Canada.
[TRANSCRIPT] – SECRETARY RUBIO: “Thank you. Thank you, all of you, first of all, for being here today. Thank you – Jacob Helberg’s doing a phenomenal job. Everybody at our department is doing a great job, and I’m very proud of the work the State Department is putting in into these and other initiatives.
One of the things we really wanted to do in our time here, and one of the reasons behind many of the reforms we undertook, is to allow us to have a State Department that could move at the speed of relevance, which is something we used to say all the time. Now it’s become almost a cliche, but it really is important – because world affairs are moving so quickly, economic developments are moving so quickly, and so much of that is internationalized, and it involves what we do around the world as well.
And so, I’m very proud of everybody at the Department of State and all the work that they’re doing to be a part of this initiative, along with our partners in the other agencies, because this truly is an interagency challenge that we’re facing.
What is the challenge that we’re here to talk about today? Let me put it to you this way: I think we made a terrible mistake in this country – not – many years ago, under people that were in charge at the time, especially at the end of the Cold War. And that was the idea that the ability to make things no longer mattered. And no matter – it didn’t matter any longer where things were made. They were to be made in the most efficient place at the lowest possible cost. That meant more profits for the company, lower costs for the consumers, and that was the way the world would work. There was this fantasy, really, that the whole world would become a free enterprise, democracies, and that everyone would look us.”
“That ran into reality – the reality that that is not how human events have ever worked, that the nation-state still does matter, nationalism is still real, national borders still matter, and that countries are going to always act in their best interest. But the result of it is that it deindustrialized America. We lost our ability and our capacity to make things, and not just big things – not just the kinds of big machinery and things that we normally identify with industry – but even some of the most basic components that are necessary, that underpin economic life, especially in the 21st century.
And we woke up to the reality just a few years ago that we are suddenly, as a nation, dangerously dependent – dangerously dependent – on other nations for all sorts of things that we need, not simply for our economic vibrancy but, in many cases, for our national security and our very survival as a prosperous nation-state. And so now we are involved in this endeavor across the board to try to reverse those mistakes. And it will be the work of multiple administrations, but it starts here and it starts now with this one that is receiving attention at its highest level.
One way is just the basic ingredients that go into all this, and it’s why you’ve seen such a focus on access to not just critical minerals as raw material but also to the ability to process them. But the other is – has to be the ability to actually make things once again. And we have to understand that re-industrialization, that 21st century industrial activity is going to look different than it did in the 20th century. It’s going to involve far more skills. It’s going to involve – not just are our workers going to have to be better educated in what they’re doing, but in many cases, given the evolution and the rapidly changing dynamics of the modern world, they may have to be retrained multiple times in their career.
One of the crown jewels that have powered American innovation and, ultimately, powered American economic influence and power around the world has been our system of higher education. It has produced extraordinary research; it has produced extraordinary breakthroughs. I think the sad part about it is the number of things we have innovated or created, but then they’re made somewhere else. And so, I think in the 21st century, this partnership with higher education is important, and it’s important for two reasons.
First of all, why build it when – why build a new wheel when we already have a wheel? We just need to repurpose that wheel to become the place where 21st century American workers go to become empowered with the skills they need to succeed. But I also think it’s important for higher education, and we’ve got some great partners here today that are already part of this initiative, and, of course, we want this partnership to grow to include other schools as well.
But I think it’s also important for higher education because, increasingly, young Americans are asking: Is the college degree worth it? Is the college route worth it? Because we have to borrow money or we have to spend money or we have to do all these sorts of things and, in the end, I get a degree, and all that degree does is either a) qualify me to get another degree or b) it may not even really lead to a job necessarily that’s different from the one I could have gotten otherwise.
And I think this speaks to that, because it also – in addition to being good for our country – is an opportunity to say to students: If you come here and you go to school and you follow this curriculum, you will leave here not just with a paper credential but with the skills that make you immediately employable in a high-paying job, in a good-paying job with long-term stability. And so this partnership is critical because what I hope it means, what I hope it symbolizes – and not just symbolizes but what I hope it is evidence of – is how government partnering with non-government entities like our higher education system and the private sector, the combination of those three pillars – the private sector that needs the workers and knows what they need from the workers; the higher education system that can equip young Americans with the skills they need to fill those jobs; and government that ensures not just that it’s acting as a convening body, but ensures that our national policies reflect these priorities. These three pillars working together drive us towards this outcome that we want, and it’s very important.
So, I think today is a great way to kick this off. We have great partners on board already. We hope to attract more. I want to thank all of you for being a part of it. And I – the last thing I want to say about this is that we understand that for this to work, this is not a two-year project. This is not a two-and-a-half-year project. This is a project that will involve sustainment for the long term. Multiple American administrations are going to have to make this a priority, which is why it’s so important that you see evidence that, at the highest levels of our government, now and for the future, you have that commitment.
And it’s why it’s exciting for us to have the Vice President here today to speak about it, because I think the evidence is not just the importance this administration gives it, but our acknowledgement that this is an issue that’s going to require long-term and sustained attention. This has to be an endeavor that goes on beyond the next two years. It has to go on for a generation. And I think having the Vice President here today with us is evidence of that commitment.
And so now I want to introduce and welcome to the stage here at the Institute of Peace, a beautiful building that the State Department’s using a lot – and we thank you all for coming – the Vice President of the United States of America, JD Vance.” (Applause.)

Ross Perot called it.
The first vote I ever placed was for Perot. As an 18-year-old, I never understood why a businessperson wasn’t running Gov’t.
Oh boy, have I learned the reason why many time since. President Trump is the first, and I hope, not the last.
The last two days of a 4 quarter series of college accounting, we covered government accounting. It is insane and any business owner who kept books that way would go to prison.
Fund accounting. Is the GFAAG still a thing?
Daymn.. I was a couple years ahead and pulled the lever for Perot. I have always wanted someone who built/employed/paid taxes/hired/fired/sweat a deal/ truly cared, CEO of the biggest enterprise the world has seen.
Of course being a businessman isn’t enough. It needs to be an executive who has the right vision.
Trump’s first SecState was a disaster, even though a well connected businessman. Rubio is not a
businessman, but he knows his business. I am hoping the Vance/Rubio team in whatever form it takes
carries on the sort of initiatives he has outlined so beautifully here.
Same here. My first time voting also. Never missed one since!
Me too. I remember Perot’s “sucking sound” he referred to about Nafta as he predicted the great exit of US manufacturing to offshore factories, as well as his pie charts.
Good ‘ol Ross Perot. That would be my second vote for President. A good choice, all things considered. Thank the good Lord for DJT coming along to (finally!) implement some of the (obviously) common sense policies that were first brought to (public) light in ’92. Thanks also Marco. Let’s Make America Great Again! What could possibly be so controversial about that!?!? God bless
The really amusing part was the speech he gave when “he called it”.
Candidate Perot would first launch into his very accurate description of the future should NAFTA come to pass, with his “that sucking sound you hear is American Jobs going off shore” speech.
Then came the amusing part … he freely admitted that he was a very rich Business Man who owned a service company and major part of the Free Port distribution centers near the DFW Airport in TX. He clearly stated he was going to make a ton of money if NAFTA came to pass via his SERVICE Company.
He openly exposed the whole truth about the damage that would be done by and who was going to make money in the coming paradigm of a service oriented US economy … publicly as part of his Presidential Campaign.
Perot was not only one of the sharpest businessmen of his day (or today) but a very entertaining character always displaying a sly little smile.
Perot was like McCarthy, a bit of a Nostradamus.
“Can I finish?!”
I now recall Perot saying that among other profound observations. Thank for the remembrance, Lady Sunshine.
I wasn’t paying much attention then, so all I truly remember about Ross Perot are his ears. (political cartoons)
Others attempted to shame me for my Perot vote. Even though it opened the door to the detestable Clintons, the needed message was sent.
wish he had been president
Marco has really stepped up.
Looking more presidential every day! Just a few years ago I would have said hell no.
I still say hell no. A leopard doesn’t change its spots.
I Praise President Trump as the one who saw these things happening, but worked to correct them! Bravo Best President ever! What a Hard Worker!
🎯 👍
It cant come soon enough! Bravo for addressing this and implementing a strategy. I watched as the globalist’s dismantled our factories and destroyed industries and towns across America and finally they determined oops! My 46 years of working for crap wages due to foreign pressure on prices and wages screwed me and so many others in the name of profits and stock price.. Hope the upcoming generations have it better but no doubt some other pox will befall them as well.
Who knew that outstanding performances such as this could be fueled by Pop Tarts!
The concept of fair trade needs to be added to his repertoire.
From 1946 forward …. The US was the only major power NOT taking serious steps to protect it’s: key GDP Related Industries, National Security related Industries and the greatest asset the US Worker. Meanwhile ALLOT her major industrial powers were raising tariffs, passing in country content laws, driving hard off-set bargains, passing anti-trust laws and more.
Another statesman-like address by Secretary Rubio, who continues to honourably burnish his superb diplomatic credentials. There have been many.
I know there are split opinions whether Vance or Rubio in 2028 for the Republican Presidential ticket.
I myself have been standing back, listening, reading, evaluating.
My conclusion is (at this point) after listening to both and examining also what they say and how they say it, as well as what they do not, Secretary Rubio would be best for America.
I know it’s a ways off, nevertheless there is information in this short essay written by Hugh Fitzgerald at Frontpage Magaazine which should help anyone understand there is only one man fit to follow President Trump into the White House.
Two years ago on his appointment to the office he now holds, I couldn’t see myself endorsing Marco Rubio.
He has changed my mind.
I now do so wholeheartedly.
https://www.frontpagemag.com/the-steadiest-and-sanest-man-in-the-administration/
Rubio would do well to continue as SecState. He is gradually redesigning what is a horrific bureaucracy full of self aggrandizing progs, into an international fighting machine. His work won’t be done in two years. Let someone else carry the banner of Prez while he continues to refine what is perhaps the most important cabinet position.
Under other circumstances I would agree. However, the more I learn of Vance, the less I am convinced he would carry on the MAGA agenda…for many reasons.
You know…that still small voice that has been whispering, but now with increasing decibels. That’s what the one inside me is doing…not so still, nor small.
I’m with you too, Betsy. I do not see Vance as President, now or ever. He is a politician, through and through. Great speaker, orator even 🙂
Rubio (has been a politician) has evolved into a world savvy man who has a better understanding of how to make the wheels turn for the many facets needed in all of the USA first, and how they fit in the world second.
Secretary Rubio has evolved, and he has grown in office. No longer a politician, but a statesman with the gravitas needed to serve as President. I’ve never been keen on Vance but couldn’t be specific why not. Time has clarified things for me. On both men.
The times now and those which are in the offing call for a serious leader. I suspect President Trump has been keenly watching, maybe even arranging situations, on duty and off, where each can demonstrate his strengths/fitness to carry on his incredible legacy. Everything to play for, so to speak, and all to lose.
I grow keener on Secretary Rubio by the day.
To be honest Betsy, I have stopped reading/watching anything “Vance”.
Imho, he comes off as performative. His mouth says all the right things, yet, his heart doesn’t seem in it.
😴
Rubio, seems more…
🤔
Earnest.
More visceral.
I prefer the later.
I prefer neither. Why did Rubio co-sponsor legislation -only two years ago- that expressly forbids President Trump from exiting warmongering NATO without obtaining prior CONgressional approval?
And Rubio is not Constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President, in any case.
That pesky US Constitution is the only thing that has held back these globalists from their long-planned totalitarian reset. Why pray tell would we knowingly set aside the natural born citizen requirement – meaning two US citizen parentage- at this most critical juncture, dear Bets?
If you want your still small voice to start screaming, give a listen to Vance’s answer to the press about his friendship with Tucker Carlson. Talk about a parseltongue response! As far as I’m concerned, he failed his 2028 audition.
it was already on the way when I read Mr Fitzgerald’s essay which I linked to above, DaP, which included a rather disturbing report about Quatarlson and Vance. For my own sanity, I must pace myself.
vance gets an F- as no hope with tucker
Agree! Vance reminds me of the made up Kenyan only more folksy
Exactly right, Oldretiredguy!!
Agree Betsy,
Sundance pointed out yesterday (?) How Rubio introduced Vance.
….”This has to be an endeavor that goes on beyond the next two years. It has to go on for a generation. And I
think having the Vice President here today with us is evidence of that commitment.”
So…
We are in the beginning stages of MAGA, yes. Someone dedicated to it must be the next to carry the banner.
I see more conviction from Rubio.
I see more wavering from Vance.
I’m often wrong on things but sometimes you get a “gut nudge.”
Yes, it’s still early.
What a time to be alive to see this.
You’re seeing his unapologetic deep faith I think, sis. And though he acknowledges his, I don’t see the same with Vance.
Correct (as usual) Betsy ….. fortunately with a deep bench, we have options TOO…..!
Lord knows, we will need every one of them.
We do, Clayton. On both counts, dear sir. And we will His help, if in His mercy will grant it.
Amen. 😉
He’s too old to have changed. He’s doing a great job as Secretary of State but no way I am supporting him as President unless he ends up as the nominee.
Too old to change?? Respectfully, I must disagree. Where do I start…
Once more…
“Holding my past against me is like looking for me at my old house….I don’t live there anymore.”
Too old to change??
If that were true, there would be no hope for anyone who reviews his or her own life, sees errors they’ve made or beliefs which they realize were wrong, and alters course. Damned for youthful missteps.
One or two chapters do not comprise your whole Book of Life, Virginian…
We would all be lost if that weren’t so.
That’s all I have…
💯 👍 ‼️ ‼️
Remember this , sorry I couldn’t find playable link:
https://www.last.fm/music/Paul+Shanklin/_/This+Land+Was+Your+Land
You can play it if you have Amazon music.
Required reading. Globalist heads exploding. Media communist sympathizers heads will not report this.
To all of this, I simply want to add:
My grandfather was the “shop principal” to a Technical High School that used to be very prominent in Chattanooga, Tennessee. He was the “principal” to an institution that taught students practical skills.
Today, this institution no longer exists. Not long ago, it was the site of a stadium. Now, it is soon to become the site of “yet more apartments.”
But, I still wonder . . . Is our country actually getting ready to re-discover?
Today, when our country looks at things like: “Make America Great Again!!” … do they actually understand what “Great” means? I seriously don’t think that they have the faintest idea.
Mike, have you been down Manufacturer’s Rd in the last decade? If one street in America tells the story, that’s it
Such a relief to hear members of a Western government who are:
Knowledgeable about the subject under discussion
Eloquent
Clever
Passionate
Well attired
Focused on their specific job responsibilities
Free from vapid, tick box, progressive language
“Knowledgeable about the subject under discussion”
I am old enough to remember when this was the bare minimum expected of anyone above an entry level position!
Sadly, now, we have produced an entire class of ignorant, arrogant, petulant “children” and placed them at the highest levels of government and academia…and if one dares to mention any of the aforementioned traits, one is immediately labeled as a member one or more of the dreaded “ist” or “phobic” groups = “Racist” “Sexist” “Islamaphobic” “Transphobic” etc.
They have no facts to back their positions and no rational responses to honest questions – all they have is name calling and a bad attitude!
Yup, but take heart. That rotten philosophy, you eloquently describe, is the dark heart of a diseased and sclerotic organism that’s dying by its own hand.
From your lips to God’s ears…. 🙏🙏🙏
Previous generations weren’t all that discerning, either, although they were more inclined to debate -and not automatically censor- dissenting viewpoints. Remember one famously vacuous presidential candidate -nicknamed jug ears- whose qualifications boiled down to voters would rather pound a beer with him?
Great speech by Rubio, without notes or teleprompters!
The Foundry School is well-named because when my grandfather opened his agricultural machinery business in 1897, it included a foundry, which allowed us to make our own cast iron machine parts, like bearing housings, out of molten metal.
Every blessed thing we needed to make a machine, like a crusher or conveyor, we could make ourselves…something the entire country of Canada can’t do today!
Back in the early days of my grandad’s business, ball bearings and roller bearings that allowed moving parts, like axles, to spin weren’t widely available, so we smelted our own bearings from a slippery metal called babbit and poured the still molten stuff into our bearing housings with them! We also made our own hardware like screws, bolts and rivets!
65 years later, a 14 year old version of me pretended to be 16 so I could work summers in my Dad’s and Uncle’s machine shop, exchanging an occasional steel splinter under my fingernail or a grinder burr in my eye for knowledge of how all those machines, like band saws, drill presses, threaders, grinders and lathes, worked!
Today, a 79 year old version of me is living a comfortable, upper middle class life, near my daughter and grandchildren, with the leisure time to do what I want!
That’s because I was taught the dignity of getting my hands dirty at an early age and because of the skills I from the craftsmen who taught me, skills that let me start my own machinery design and fabrication business!
THAT’s the American Dream, Baby, and you won’t find it in the hallowed halls of Harvard!
I wish The Foundry School well as they begin the arduous process of teaching deluded young Americans that building a solid foundation is more important to their futures than breaking a class ceiling!
Wow. Wonderful!
JHinOH, there was a time when a young man’s dream of a better future and having the wherewithal to support a wife and family came from apprenticing to a master craftsman! We lost our way when young people started looking down on “blue collar” work…but the Trump administration is changing that mindset and we’ll be a better country for it!
It was studied in the 80’s at Harvard B School – those who actually make things tend to be the innovators of the world. America was sold out for a quick fast buck by the multinationals. And ‘financial engineering’ isn’t engineering but hucksterism.
We can have either a value borrowed economy or a value added economy.
A value added economy will mine a rock, a bucket of dirt and then smelt it into metal. Then take that metal and manufacture it into a finished product. Ship that product to market. Each step of adding value to that rock or bucket of dirt employs people from the bottom, middle and top of the ladder. There is upward mobility based upon merit. It creates new products, methods and solutions that benefit society. The nation’s wealth is spread out into more hands and so government has to be representative to a greater proportion of the nation.
A value borrowed economy is a service economy that depends upon imports. It concentrates wealth in fewer hands. Limits upward mobility. Expands the size of government in order to provide services to the un and under employed. It depends upon debt and gimmicks to keep kicking the can down the road. Government is dependent upon and answers to the top tier of where the wealth has concentrated.
I asked my browser’s AI , “Which politicians were primarily responsible for the shift to a service-driven economy?”
The answer was pretty balanced to libs and ‘conservatives.’ AI tends to be like Wikipedia for political questions. But given the concern these days about rinos and uniparty, this doesn’t seem too outrageous:
______________
No single politician is universally credited with initiating the shift to a service-driven economy, as the transition was a gradual structural change driven by globalization, technology, and demographics beginning in the 1960s and 1970s.
However, several U.S. presidents and global leaders are widely cited for accelerating the process through specific policies:
Ronald Reagan: Often identified as the key figure who accelerated the shift in the 1980s. His administration prioritized deregulation, tax cuts, and reduced government oversight, which facilitated the move of manufacturing jobs overseas and the expansion of the service sector.
Richard Nixon: A conservative trend in social and economic policy began in his second term, laying the groundwork for the deregulation and market-oriented approaches that followed.
Bill Clinton: Continued the transition in the 1990s by supporting free trade agreements (such as NAFTA) and policies that encouraged the offshoring of domestic jobs to countries with lower labor costs, further embedding the U.S. in a global service and export-oriented economy.
Margaret Thatcher: While not a U.S. president, her contemporaneous policies in the UK (deregulation, privatization, and labor market flexibility) paralleled Reagan’s and helped establish the neoliberal paradigm that favored service-sector growth and globalized production in Western nations.
It is important to note that all U.S. presidents from Reagan to Biden, regardless of party, supported free trade and the broader transition to a service economy, though their specific policy emphases varied. The shift was not the result of a single legislative act but a convergence of market forces, technological change, and consistent policy support for globalization across administrations.
Wall Street was very much behind the offshoring of our jobs too. Bonuses increased dramatically which incentivized others to offshore too. Remember the catch phrase “Greed is good”. They lived it.
They also forgot about the environmental impact. China, Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, etc. have no real protections for the environment. The air, soil and water contamination is wide spread. China had to shutdown factories for a week just before they hosted the Olympics because of all the air pollution. It is almost as if our environmental laws were an accelerant to move manufacturing overseas. Yes, we need environmental protections and serves as a reason to have manufacturing here rather than where there are none.
My first vote was Ross Perot…sorrynotsorry
As a veteran of 40-years in business as well as National Trade Association leadership, I can aver that
President Trump is the most experienced and talented Chief Executive that America and indeed, the
world has ever seen. The man is focused, tireless and totally devoted to his mission of Making America
Great Again. His ability to field endless questions on all topics ad hoc, without missing a beat is truly a
wonder. ‘Just ponder for a moment the stark difference between his daily performance and that of “Old
Joe” Biden. Simply astounding! We are truly blessed to have him at the helm!
Rubio is 55, Vance is 42. I see Rubio as either President, or Governor of Florida. Vance is not old enough to be President, and he has no experience in running anything. Making a few speeches here and there is nothing.
You only have to be 35 years old to run for president so Vance is old enough. But I would definitely choose Marco Rubio over Vance.
“We either reindustrialize our national economy, moving completely away from the ‘service-driven’ narrative of years past, or we will forever consign ourselves to economic servitude.” emphasis added
marco rubio has been a true revelation.
But is JD Vance up to running the country ? 🤔
My first vote as an 18 year old was for Ronald Reagan. But I definitely voted for Ross Perot because I always thought the president should be a smart and successful businessman. I had to wait until 2016 to finally get one.