Appearing for an interview on Fox News with his daughter-in-law Lara Trump, President Trump explains the current status of the negotiations with Iran and more of the details within the deal as tentatively outlined. WATCH:
.
Posted in Big Government, Donald Trump, Economy, Iran, media bias, President Trump, Press Secretary - Trump, Uncategorized
I am concerned that the President wants a Deal so bad that he will make a bad deal. AND also any deal the Mullahs make they will violate it anyway. These Islamozazis should not be reward in anyway for their activities over the last 50 years.
he wants the peace deal. Very badly, that we know. And so do the Iranian IRGC knows it as well.
Fox.com is reporting a possible resignation submitted by the President of Iran, due to “deepening internal divisions” within.
It is mentioned that it is unknown if the ‘resignation’ was ‘accepted’….
Please don’t be concerned. President Trump is the greatest deal maker in the world. He is a brilliant man who is thoroughly America First, knows exactly what he wants and knows how to get it.
Might I suggest that you turn off whatever fake news source it was that caused you such unnecessary anxiety. Stick with CTH and Sundance.
uh ok but any deal that unfreezes Iran assets will be a funding mechanism for future
Islamic Terror
🎯
I share those concerns.
I suspect that Trump is “dealing” because that is what Iran’s Muslim neighbors want him to do — and Trump is trying to thread the needle of making them happy while at the same time getting an “acceptable” deal with Iran.
I don’t know if that is possible.
President Trump has made it plain regarding the N bomb. Can’t have. The strait sort of became a problem no one else will fix though it affects them more than us. Sort of ‘you broke it, now fix it’ kind of deal. Inside Iran is not our concern. President Trump has given the people a chance. We’re not there to fix Iran. We’re there to take the ‘no bomb’ open the strait and out. That’s my opinion anyway.
We have the means to bring them to Unconditional Surrender. I prefer that.
I like what CTH and Promethean Action says about the real reasons why we are going after Iran and what we are trying to achieve.
I would also like to hear those real reasons echoed from President Trump and the administration.
I would like that as well.
But given how difficult the media and the globalists make it for him to communicate even simple messages, it seems he has decided not to use time getting caught in what would become convoluted discussions that would suck even more of his time.
Promethean has at least three people doing weekly talks and others delivering a large amount of content. Yet they are challenged in making their communication clear because it involves history and the most complex political relationships among multiple countries.
It also involves people “unlearning” what they have “been taught for generations.
It seems President Trump’s strategy is to deliver easy to understand messages.
I wish someone in the cabinet could do for this what Sec. Bessent does for economic content But it is very complex and hard to talk about when it involves countries most people think of as our allies.
One thing we can all do is use the PA content to spread the word.
As President Trump has said repeatedly, there’s going to be a great deal or no deal.
But what is a “great” deal??
Another 60 day ceasefire without the total and complete opening of Hormuz? Without the unambiguous commitment of Iran to cease and desist their nuclear ambitions? Without firm possession of the enriched “dust” by the US?
Why are we not just dictating terms?
And he has a track record that proves he does great deals!
There are 2 really big difficulties with trying to come to an ACCEPTABLE deal with Iran.
#1 — We may not be negotiating with Iranians who actually have the POWER to cut a deal. I fear that unless we are dealing with the IRGC itself, whatever “deal” is made is probably with someone(s) who really don’t have the OPERATIONAL power to implement it.
#2 — Irrespective of #1 above — the Iranians are totally untrustworthy. They will say or sign ANYTHING while being committed to breaking their agreement THE INSTANT they think they can.
I think we stopped the “kinetic action” a couple weeks too soon. And I fear that when the Iranians violate whatever “deal” is made — and they will — we will not IMMEDIATELY destroy something to let them know how unacceptable that was.
And why are there any “negotiations” anyway? Seems to me that, like with Japan and Germany, we should be dictating terms.
Period.
We are not hearing too much about the “forgotten men and women of Iran”….the average citizens…who have it pretty rough right now, from what I understand. Certainly, they should be involved in these ‘negotiations’, too.
Exactly! Wouldn’t our team know after a week if the Iranians were serious about a negotiated agreement?
The Iranians send a delegation of Harvard and Cambridge eductated English speaking negotiators in Italian shoes and $2,500 Saville Row suits that have no authority to agree with anything. Obviously, the IRGC hasn’t suffered enough yet.
And in other news:
“Sources close to the student’s family have reported that confessions were extracted from her during her detention, a claim that has not been independently verified. However, during her judicial hearing, she rejected the charges brought against her and stated that she played no role in the matters attributed to her.
The report further notes that during the most recent court session, it was announced that due to the severity of the charges, her case will be referred to Tehran for further proceedings.”
https://iranwire.com/en/news/153050-diana-taherabadi-16-year-old-student-arrested-during-the-protests/
Ultimately, Trump does NOT want the US to be the peacekeeping force in the ME. He wants the regional power brokers to play that role.
That means he needs buy in from Israel, Qatar, UAE, Saudi, and Pakistan.