Lol. I wouldn’t buy that story if I was using somebody else’s money.

As a result of the lack of confidence in the FBI that the American public has now, the FBI needs to be dismantled and reconstructed. As a result of their ugly behavior and unlawful actions, I don’t know of anybody that thinks of them as America’s premiere law enforcement agency. It stinks but that is just the way it is…

Incredulous …I am sickened by the gaslighting in the spotlight of an incredible admission.

Appears as though Kash is rubbing it the MAGA faces that he tricked us and was working for the DS the entire time.

I know I posted some snark earlier, but seriously.

The cabal would be more than pleased making Comey and Wray the fall guys.

..While leaving the thousands of roaches hiding in the walls to emerge later.

How, exactly, is someone in plain clothes, expected to control a riot?

Furthermore, how can one state, “there is no indication any FBI agents were involved in any events related to Trump’s speech on the morning of Jan. 6 at the Ellipse”…

When they “admittedly”…
Were dressed to blend in?

That does it. FIRE HIM NOW.

WTF, this Ka$H guy is worse than I expected.

Patel, once again, lets his alligator mouth overload his canary a$$. He appears to be the master of the ‘ready fire, aim’ approach to providing cogent information about anything. In my opinion, he doesn’t seem to be very smart.

They look like Jake and Elwood in that last picture. The Boob Brothers.

Please Mr. President, fire these clowns. Fox News Bondi, too.

Andrew Bailey is there now at FBI.

Existing tech would allow for all 274 to be digitally identified in all the thousands of hours of video from that day, say a floating number 1-274 over their head and a bright blue outline around each. It would show the location, actions and sometimes even words of every one of them at every second. Let the truth out Kash.

Continuation of always thinking we are the most stupid people on the planet.

ANY cred Patel ever expects to have or earn DESTROYED when he makes such stupid, asinine, false statements.

WE SAW THE results…We KNOW there were bad actors, period.

i believe he is compromised, whether it be his girlfriend or some other event in his past. You can’t come out with that sort of explanation as quickly as he did, without some sort of investigation, unless someone handed him a script and said “Here, read this!”

Agents. Agents provocateur.

Yeah, Sure, They all put on blazers clearly marked FBI and started Quelling.

Telling people to leave. Arresting people who continued to riot.
Driving people out of the Capitol and driving them off of the Capitol Grounds.

You know, Quelling.

Oh, please. Since when do law enforcement agencies send in plainclothes cops to quell a riot? This is one of the dumbest things I’ve heard in recent years, and I’ve heard hundreds upon hundreds of dumb things.

Were the agents standing by the Epstein files?

There was no riot until the FBI dressed as Trump supporters started one .

Methinks Director Patel is being sucked into the swamp.

It is impossible to evaluate any statements emitted by the FBI. Trust nothing you hear. Trust nothing you see.

Pray! Pray to the One who can be trusted.

274 FBI incognito, doing what?

Each time Kash comes out, trying to explain FBI malfeasance, I have less regard for him. This story smells to high heaven. How were these agents dressed, and how did they quell unruly behavior? The FBI personnel that is feeding Patel this story are trying to save their sorry asses.

If Kash believes this is what happened, he is either stupid or doing all he can to keep the FBI as an agency. If he dismantles the FBI, he would be out of a job.

Seems Kash quite enjoys having smoke blown up his arse.

I no longer wish to speculate on Director Patel’s motivations.
.
Petel has made himself an obstical to TRUTH.
.
I pray Patel is fired along with the 274 FBI agents.
.

I think he is a decent guy but we might be watching the Peter Principal in full display. I’m still willing to give him some more time seeing as how he has to constantly shovel S against the tide.

Where are the details on this operation? There would be a report on this. Is Kash Patel an idiot or does he think we are. The pre-op plan would detail if those involved were dressed with MAGA hats and other details. I’m losing all patience and respect for Patel at this point.

Kash Patel turns out to be a joke………

someone or some group are controlling this fool………

surely PT can see this now….!!!

100% compromised. He lies with impunity that’s how you know. We are also being gaslit on Charlie Kirk. I voted for Trump 3 times and support him 100% but his appointments for FBI,CIA and DOJ are simply F-ed up. All three need to go.

If 274 agents were “on hand” to “quell riots”, why be in plainclothes? Why not dress in full FBI regatta?

If you want to deter, you look the part. You wear your uniform, you show you’re armed.
If you want to instigate, insight, or simply ID and profile civilians, you wear plainclothes.

That is the last straw.
Cash is not a good guy.
There I said it and it’s liberating

BS, I was there. Someone was going through the crowd instigating. I was at the pool on the mall side it was calm.
Check the numbers 300 agents were more than the number of protesters in the videos.
Again, BS

Where is there one instance of anyone anywhere trying to “quell” the “riot”.

All I saw were uniformed “officers” trying to *cause* the riot.

This was a planned in advance entrapment scheme and Pelosi was the mastermind. Eleven separate phone calls between her and Ray Epps in the week leading up to it .

This makes no sense. Something is amiss with Patel. He knows we are not stupid so why would he feed us this ration of BS?

Now that Noem is taking charge on ANTIFA, I see this kind of stuff from Patel in the same way I see Bondi going on Faux News after Trump announced the Portland crackdown. They know they look bad. And they also know that Trump is aware that they look bad. Hopefully they’ll all get the pink slips before the end of the year.

I don t i feel safer w the Blues Brothers

Don’t you remember seeing all those FBI agents out there trying to pacify the situation? Nor do I.

Have all 274 testify under oath.

They were all likely provocateurs.

And, what about the CI (confidential informants) deployed by the fblie?

Sure… I believe every word.

🙄🙄🙄

What were these agents ordered to do and by whom? Is the plan to get intel from these agents to catch bigger fish (which is what I believe).

How many CI’s were in the crowd and what was their mission/s?

That Men in Black meme nails it.

A “Deadly Attack” on the Capitol?

Yesterday, I was listening to a classical-music station when NPR came on with the news. Addressing the controversy surrounding former President Trump’s efforts to keep secret his records relating to the January 6 protests at the Capitol, the NPR reporter referred to the “deadly attack” on the Capitol.

I immediately thought to myself, “Well, that’s certainly an interesting use of language.”

When I hear the word “attack,” I think of weapons, specifically guns, grenades, or missiles that are intended to kill people. For example, when the Pentagon fired a missile at that family in Afghanistan shortly before exiting its 20-year war in that country, I would term that an “attack” — and a “deadly attack” at that, especially given that many innocent people, including children, were killed by that missile.

One of the fascinating aspects of the “attack” on the Capitol is that the “attackers” didn’t have guns. In fact, as far as I know, they didn’t even have any swords. To me, that’s one unusual “attack.” In fact, I’ll bet that there haven’t been many other “attacks” in history in which the “attackers” failed to use weapons to commit their “attack.”

What about words? Yeah, the Capitol “attackers” certainly employed a lot of words during the course of their “attack.” Maybe that is what NPR means when it describes what happened as an “attack” — that the “attackers” were engaged in a “word attack” on the Capitol. Imagine how frightening that “attack” must have been — with “attackers” hitting one victim with some particular word — maybe “Tyrant!” — followed by some other word, perhaps “Thief!” 

Now, I think you would agree with me that that would be one scary “attack”!

In fact, it was so scary that one Capitol police officer shot and killed one of the “attackers” because he was so afraid that the “attackers” were coming to get him. He wasn’t the only one who was afraid. Many members of Congress were equally terrified of the Word-Attackers. 

Hey, don’t judge these people too harshly. You don’t know how you would react if a bunch of Word-Attackers were coming after you and flinging and hurling nasty words at you.

Another interesting aspect of the NPR news broadcast was the reporter’s reference to the “deadly” attack on the Capitol. Now, when I hear that someone has engaged in a “deadly” attack, I immediately think that the attackers have killed people in the course of their attack. 

Yet, here, the “attackers” didn’t kill anyone. Instead, the only person killed was one of the “attackers.” Her name was Ashli Babbitt. She was shot dead by that Capitol policeman who was terrified that Babbitt and the “attackers” were coming to get him and members of Congress. It’s still not clear why he didn’t fire a warning shot over her head. If he had done that, she undoubtedly would have backed off, especially since she was unarmed, well, except for words in her vocabulary.

For a while, the news media was reporting that Capitol police officer Brian Sicknick was beaten to death by the “attackers.” For example, the New York Times reported that he “was overpowered and beaten by rioters from the mob at the Capitol.” 

Could that be what NPR is referring to when it cites the “deadly” attack on the Capitol?

I don’t think so because as things turned out, what the Times reported about Sicknick turned out to be incorrect. An autopsy revealed that Sicknick died of natural causes, to wit: strokes. 

The New York Times also reported that a woman named Rosanne Boyland, who was one of the “attackers,” “appears to have been killed in a crush of fellow rioters during their attempt to fight through a police line.” 

Alas, what appeared to be true wasn’t. An autopsy revealed that she died of a drug overdose, not trampling. 

Two other “attackers” — Kevin Greeson and Benjamin Phillips — died of a heart attack and a stroke. 

Thus, five people died during the “deadly attack.” One “attacker “was killed by a terrified Capitol police officer. One Capitol police officer and two of the “attackers” died of natural causes. Another “attacker” died of a drug overdose.

Given the nature of those deaths, is it really proper to refer to the “deadly” attack on the Capitol? Doesn’t the use of the term “deadly” imply that the attackers deliberately shot or killed people as part of their “attack”? 

Maybe NPR is saying that the words that the “attackers” were employing as weapons caused those people to have heart attacks, strokes, and drug overdoses. Maybe their words are what caused that police officer who killed Ashli Babbitt to become terrified.

Ironically, as far as I know, the Justice Department hasn’t charged any of the January 6 protestors with murder or even a massive conspiracy to initiate a “deadly attack” on the Capitol. What’s up with that? Those federal prosecutors need to start listening to NPR.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/deadly-attack-capitol/5761382

Patel needs to go.

In Love and War always find the liability of the opponent

Perfect picture. Forget this ever happened and move along.

Unbelievable. Sundance calls it correctly again. We have Bondi at DOJ and Patel at FBI who will not confront the corruption of their institutions. Is the fact that both have been registered foreign agents of Qatar in any way involved? After all, Qatar is connected with the globalist efforts to destroy the national sovereignty of governments around the world, and Qatar works FROM WITHIN to destroy our government.

To that end, it is well known that Qatar funds university curricula that teach that Zionism is racism/colonialism, and that stimulate Jew hatred. In addition, Qatar is involved in trying to divid MAGA through antisemitism coming from conservatives. I wonder what the 4 members of Trump’s cabinet did for Qatar or are currently doing for Qatar? One thing both of them might be doing is making sure that those in their institutions who are there to destroy our government stay employed. Or is that too fanciful an idea?

On a related subject Lisa Monaco, now employed by Microsoft, has been called out by President Trump who states that she should be fired.

“Corrupt and Totally Trump Deranged Lisa Monaco (A purported pawn of Legal Lightweight Andrew Weissmann), was a senior National Security aide under Barrack Hussein Obama, and a Lawfare and Weaponization obsessed Deputy Attorney General under Crooked Joe Biden and Lisa’s Puppet “Boss” Attorney General Merrick Garland, who were all the architects of the worst ever Deep State Conspiracies against our Country (RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA, the January 6th Hoax, the Illegal Raid on Mar-a-Lago, the Biden “Autopen” Scandal, the Documents Witch Hunt, and more!).

“Monaco has been shockingly hired as the President of Global Affairs for Microsoft, in a very senior role with access to Highly Sensitive Information. Monaco’s having that kind of access is unacceptable, and cannot be allowed to stand. She is a menace to U.S. National Security, especially given the major contracts that Microsoft has with the United States Government. Because of Monaco’s many wrongful acts, the U.S. Government recently stripped her of all Security Clearances, took away all of her access to National Security Intelligence, and banned her from all Federal Properties. It is my opinion that Microsoft should immediately terminate the employment of Lisa Monaco. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DJT”

https://therightscoop.com/breaking-trump-calls-for-the-termination-of-biden-hack-hired-by-microsoft/

So the Patel version is essentially “the J6 protestors were on the FBI’s radar “?

What am I missing? Kash Patel’s statement clearly is not his opinion, but a lie that was told by Chris Wray and conveyed to him. He is repeating, for transparency, what he has been told. There is nothing that says HE was the one who proclaimed this reasoning for the 274 agents.

His quote.
“274 FBI agents were thrown into crowd control on Jan 6 against FBI standards. That failure was on corrupt leadership. Thanks to agents stepping up, the truth is coming out. Transparency. Justice. Accountability.”

I just don’t see how his statement can be construed to mean he agrees with the reasoning in any way. Nothing he said says he believes it.

There is no way any FBI agent would go into a crowd control situation without wearing identifying Kevlar vests, jackets, riot gear, etc.. They also wouldn’t separate, but would work together as teams, per their training. I don’t recall seeing any FBI jackets or identifying logos in any of the J6 videos. Total BS excuse for a corrupt organization.

And if they were there to control the crowd… Why wasn’t the crowd controlled???

This doesn’t add up. You don’t send plain clothes officers into a crowd for crowd control. You send in uniformed officers. You send in something, someone with authority (officers in uniform, military, national guard, etc) This is a blatant lie.