While it is a strong win, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision to fully stay the lower court order was not unexpected. The temporary restraining order issued by District Judge Charles Breyer was obviously political and legally weak, very weak.
The Ninth CCA simply affirmed that a violent crisis was afoot in California; federal officials and buildings were under attack; the local police and state government did nothing to stop it; so President Trump took legally authorized action to intervene, and took control of the national guard. [SEE RULING HERE]
The decision is not complicated. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously concluded President Trump lawfully exercised his authority in federalizing control of the guard. The ruling affirmed the Trump administration presented enough evidence to show it had a rationale for doing so, citing violent acts by protesters.
“The undisputed facts demonstrate that before the deployment of the National Guard, protesters ‘pinned down’ several federal officers and threw ‘concrete chunks, bottles of liquid, and other objects’ at the officers. Protesters also damaged federal buildings and caused the closure of at least one federal building. And a federal van was attacked by protesters who smashed in the van’s windows,” the court wrote. “The federal government’s interest in preventing incidents like these is significant.”
The court also found that even if the federal government failed to notify the governor of California before federalizing the National Guard as required by law, Newsom had no power to veto the president’s order. A common sense straightforward interpretation of the law.
Now, let’s expand this lawful process into every non-compliant blue city and state and go remove the illegal aliens.
Good news. PDJT federalized the CANG because of the organized professional protestors. There should be an effort to dismantle these DNC backed NGOs that are behind these non-organic and violent protests. Perhaps, a reverse lawfare approach with a ruling like this from the 9th Circuit
apparently, professional protesters can be financed by just about anyone and there is nothing illegal about doing that.
I am mixed about that, given that I contribute to many organizations that do in fact “help out” recruiting people to protest various political matters. such as pro life. I realized about 10 years ago, that if we expect volunteers and only volunteers to step up and show up, then we are going to lose against the lawfare types and ngo’s and soros’ of the world. Of course I wish this were not true and that we could count on the organic patriot to show up and many of them do. But more do go, when they know that it’s not going to be a 100 percent burden on them financially to do so.
I guess what I am saying is that I would be on principle against criminalizing paid protesters. the demented left seems to have lots of spare time on their hands and doesn’t care much about financial burdens, so they would outnumber our side of the argument at each of these protests and rallies/
now having said that, I absolutely believe that DOJ should be looking and investigating exactly the kinds of violence and making a link to that violence to whatever orgs are financing these groups. That could be a civil right division case should the DOJ decide to grow a pair and throw down the gauntlet. Imagine the soros’ of the world worried they can be sued for supporting a violent criminal ? right now, they are riding free and seemingly the DOJ and state law enforcement are only going after the criminals…but not the orgs that sponsor them.
it’s not complicated, just takes some guts.
God Bless America
Maybe if there was a law that said that any NGO backing violence, especially against the government, or any employee of an NGO previously proven to back violence (to prevent those working to promote violence from one NGO from going to work for another) can be permanently banned from receiving more than $50 in federal funding in any decade. It does no good to shut down one NGO only to have it pop up pretty much in tact as another NGO.
Like colleges, why do we even support NGOs after all? If their purpose is that noble and that desired, why can’t they raise their own money Sort of like the unions who require membership and then have a “committee” who decides who union money supports politically (usually NOT the person supported by those who fund the “donations”).
These people don’t simply “protest”. Things get violent, dangerous, out of hand. This is what youre supporting.
please read my post clearly. ty
I would wager that the NGOs you contribute to, are not the violent protest type (again, pro-life). Rather they are the ones violently suppressed by counter protestors paid for by the left.
In addition to going after those financing protests and groups that employ violence, any group or person funding protests should be disqualified from any government funding.
The right to peacefully protest MUST be upheld. There is NOT a right, nor should there be a desire, to use taxpayer money to fund ANY protest.
Just takes a Ken Paxton but we have a Pam Blondie.
Jello AJ pam fox news blondie.😏
Yup. Exactly!
The Senate will not confirm a real A.G.
state AG’s still have enormous power to bring indictment and lawsuits. I know Ken Paxton, I know AG Landry in my own home state of Lousiana are highly motivated and active on this front. This is one of the reasons you don’t see antifa and other nefarious groups exposing themselves in those states. That should be viewed for what it is. that there remains mindful watchers who are not going to stand still and watch the streets get owned by anarchists. There is a reason why this happens in democrat held states and cities.
stage 4, revolution: transfer of power.
It’s just a matter of time before these democratic party controlled sanctuary idiots begin to realize that doing nothing IS a decision to complictly enable anarchy. There are subject and will become active once that political heat threatens their personal lives. which I estimate will happen now that the horde appears willing to go after ANY POLITICAL TARGET. the Minnesota assassin has made the democrats tone down the dangerous rhetoric. It’s noticeable. That is telling. It means they know there is an ignition point that is about the be reached where they may have to consider doing something they have up to this point, refused to attend.
God Bless America
That’s the difference. These people have to be paid to show up and show off. Patriots must take time off from work, pay babysitters/dog walkers, gas, lunch and parking to go to a peaceful demonstration.
Aside from Trump Rallies and the Pro Life March, the J6th Setup and the Charlottesville put the brakes on Normals gathering in large numbers to voice grievances on account of the crippling fear of being rounded up by the American Stasi, should any bad actors cut loose at an otherwise peaceful event.
The Communists get bussed in, paid cash, fed whatever it is liberals eat, handed weapons, the drugs of their choice, riot gear, and a card with a number of a prepaid legal service when and if they are arrested.
The FBI has a shit ton of money to use toward these protester services. Their books are ALL black.
It can’t be that difficult to figure out who paid for the bricks, cinder blocks, gas masks and charter buses.. good thing I turned my life around.. if I had chosen the career criminal path I might have made it to WEF Grandmaster going up against geniuses like these..
It isn’t.
The problem is the names on the invoices from abc brick company are fake, and most likely paid in cash. It isn’t illegal to buy bricks, is the argument. While true, that makes the rabbit holes one giant circle and nearly impossible to follow to an end.
They didn’t rent those buses with cash..
I don’t think they are rented at all. The CIA and FBI both own several front companies from which they operate and derive cash flow, albeit on a smaller scale. It isn’t a stretch to think one of those is a bus company.
I wonder if the FBI and CIA have front security firms too (like Vance Boeltker’s). Would be a great way to hide a hit squad.
Making the NGOs responsible for Criminal Acts doesn’t seem unreasonable. The deliberate hiring of hardened criminals by BLM/ Anti-fa should have resulted in mass arrest but Sundance has addressed that.
Strip tax exemption status from all foundations & this goes away.
The shell game of moving 💰💵 from 1 to another stops when it becomes income.
Then ban taxpayer funding of any org that pays for protests or advocacy on matters governed by federal law. If you wish to contribute, fine go ahead. No forced funding by taxpayers.
Edit: By “you” I mean any private ctizen.
sponsoring criminal activity protests should be illegal if the org is caught don’t you think?
it is in fact illegal to promote, abete, support, and finance violent criminal activity.
as I have stated, this is clearly an unlawful activity, but it REQUIRES THE FBI/DOJ to take this seriously.
I look at the docket routinely to inspect what charges have been made, what grand juries have been formed and filed and it’s a blank page.
bondi and Kash are busy no doubts about it. But we have a special prosecutor now in DC who wields extraordinary powers PLUS the prosecutors assigned to homeland. and I’m hearing crickets. I know I am an impatient person, but at this point in time, one would expect to see some kind of activity filed in courts and that is telling. I understand prioritizing resources is of the utmost concern given we are dealing with multiple simultaneous threats..on principle, the first principle, it should be make USA safe domestically. There is a non zero probability that these groups, antifa, and a certain percentage of illegals are here and finance to create domestic anarchy. We can’t deal with external threats, such as Iran and Ukraine, houthis, Hamas, china without also realizing there is a real and present danger that exist within our borders that is actively flaunting violence against the rule of law.
I personally have come to the decision, as it were, that mass arrests need to happen and tie up most of these people and investigate properly how they are funded, by whom and start indictments, that also includes specific political figures in DC and at the state level who are actively engaged in an insurrection against our champion, President Trump.
I have called for this repeatedly at the outset of the first series of antifa riots and violence and now that we have President Trump in office, complete with people he selected to take charge of matters such as this, is the optimal timing to get after it. it is discouraging to me, that there seems to be no activity..but again, I expect much and quickly. The threat demands swiftness. It must be put down soon so there is no doubts what will happen when you openly throw fire bombs, bricks, explosives, gas agents and otherwise assault police and federal agents who are conducting official law enforcement efforts.
some have called for the federal agencies to being deputizing citizens and train them to become civilian quick response teams …not with arrest authority, but to document with camera and witness statements and also to crowd source a means to determine who these people are and provide that information and testify before a grand jury to get the known and arrested.
This idea may seem outside the box, but we have to start thinking about what WE THE PEOPLE can do to help this administration in every possibly way to quell this anarchism.
God Bless America
God Bless America
It’s illegal even if it’s NOT caught!
And the Feds can start reacting to actual physical violence that may and does harm to the federal officers, with violence of their own (shoot a few of them).
If a bartender is liable for a drunk driving…
Not in Nevada. Mostly. A bartender is responsible for refusing service to an overly intoxicated patron if they show signs of being overly intoxicated. But many people don’t show the signs. Plus, a bartender does not know whether or not you walked, drove, bicycled, or took an Uber to the bar.
In Nevada, YOU are mostly responsible for making the decision to get behind the wheels of a vehicle and drive. YOU are in your body and know that drinking and driving is dangerous. So YOU, as an adult, get to suffer the consequences of your stupidity.
Those that are funding these riots should be forced to pay for damages to businesses including lost income. These are not organic protests.
Be careful, they have been overturned by SCOTUS around 80% of the time.
From sundance twitter feed: The FBI is allowing Antifa to exist. There is no doubt now. Convicted perp(s) from the past Antifa riots are participating in the current riots. This is confirmed by video analysis.
Ka$h and BonJovi need to be fired now!
JMO.
Fire b-bondi, patel, and bongio for leaving in place the 5,000+ weaponizing, disloyal, treasonous, thugs from the biden, communist administration ……….. in the DOJ and the 3-letter departments.
Removing the 5,000+ weaponizing, disloyal, treasonous, thugs in the DOJ and the 3-letter departments is as important as removing the 42,000,000 illegals from within our walls. Both represent a “clear and present danger” to America’s Constitutional Republic and Americans.
At the least, b-bondi, patel, and bongio are guilty of dereliction-of-duty ……. at the most, they are complicit in the weaponization of the DOJ and 3-letter departments against Americans.
MAGA isn’t just our motto, it is our duty!
How can Bongino talk as tough as he did on his show, and be so weak when the President of the United States handed him the power to effect what he’s been saying on TV for years needed to be done?
Kash and Bondi talked tough in their spotlights as well. What happened? Were they always corrupt? Did some inner thugs from the FBI or CIA corner them in a dark alley and let them know the script they had to follow to save their children and grandchildren? Is there kompromat by which they are being bribed and controlled?
I wonder what the meetings are like between POTUS and these three?
(I will move these questions to the presidential thread)
President Trump won’t take any action until the BBB is signed into law.
The BBB is now the BBBBB (Big Beautiful Bill on Back Burner) due to Iran conflict.
Yes!!! People seem to be missing this point. Until BBB and the Rescission bills are passed, PDJT is stuck in a holding pattern.
He has to play nice with these losers to get the main point of his policies accomplished.
My opinion, they played a part to be seen as “trusted sources”.
They used that trust to gain access to Trump’s inner circle, to be used behind the scenes to work against Trump from within. Think Pence. You think he’s on your side but when it truly matters, he’s not. Infiltration.
It appears the directive is “Hold the Line”.
does fbi sponsor antifa?
yes.
Someone(who can not be criticize here) get them by..ba*ls…….I do not see explanation of actions/no actions those two……
Portland needs them badly.
I came here after ‘Oppenheimer‘ concluded to post just that. I find reflecting on history to provide insight and clarity.
It’s going to be a long hot summer.
I’m surprised to see the 9th Circuit render a reasonable decision. Normally, they’re just as far “out there” as Breyer was.
President Trump placed some judges on the 9th Circuit during his first term–thereby making it a more reasonable court.
This was a 9-0 decision which means it was so obviously a politicized ruling that the 9th KNEW it would be overturned by SCOTUS so why not stop it now.
I was on the road Tuesday and listening to a conservative am radio station talking about this. My understanding is that it was a 3-0 decision w/two conservative prez appointments and one of the other persuasion. Not en banc. I believe there are 20+ judges within the 9th district so Gruesome in theory could appeal but commentator mentioned that with the one liberal judge siding in unison with conservatives it would most likely be a waste of time so not likely.
Thats why they are also called the 9th Circus Court.🤨
For any who do not know him, I’d like to introduce one of the judges on the 9th Circuit, a Montana resident, and his recent dissent in Duncan v Bonta. He’s a 2A advocate and interested watchers may enjoy both his knowledge of firearms and how he brings logic to the milieu.
I’ve also long called the 9th a circus, having lived in California for over sixty years before leaving, but it does have its conservative voices.
The anti-gun lawyer cleverly but disingenuously claimed protected arms are those in “common use for self defense per Heller”. While dicta in Heller did note handguns are the most common self defense arm, Heller did *not* claim that to be a protected class of arms, those arms must be in common use for self defense.
Indeed, other courts over prior decades (and of course, I can’t recall then at this time but knew them well during my 20 years as both an FFL dealer and later, FFL Type 3 manufacturer [all the ‘regular’ firearms] and SOT Class II [NFA weapons] manufacturer) declared the arms protected by 2A are (variously by different courts) those:
In common use by the public In common use by the military.
As to #2, this means everyone should be able to buy a select fire M4, MK18, M16, MP5, etc; and because of this, the 1986 Firearm Owners Protection Act (FOPA, the first law ever passed against a Federal agency, in this case BATF) ban on said purchases by private individuals of NFA items made after May 1986 is unconstitutional. As to #1, this means that wholesale bans on, say, the AR15 (whether by state or federal declaration) are unconstitutional infringements on 2A
I digress….
The point is this. Arms protected by the Constitution are not those in “in common use for self defense”. Arms protected by the Constitution vis a vis Bruen are those “in common use”, period.
In US v. Miller (1939) the Supreme Court ruled that the National Firearms Act regulating sawed-off shotguns as requiring a license to possess constitutional since (and this is the most important part of the reasoning) the sawed-off shotgun is NOT the type of shotgun used by the military. The long-barreled shotgun could not be regulated since the possession of such a shotgun would aid a member of the Militia in becoming familiar with the shotgun issued by the military, thus insuring a “well-regulated militia,” which means “well-trained,” in this context, and closer to a position of preparedness for military service. The Marine Corps would call this being a “squared-away” Marine. The AR-15 is UNTOUCHABLE, since it undoubtedly provides members of the “Unorganized militia” to become familiar with the MAIN BATTLE RIFLE (MBR) of the military prior to any return to Selective Service conscription. By owning an AR-15, a member of the Unorganized Militia becomes familiar with the operation of the MBR, its safe handling, and how to field strip, clean, and reassemble the weapon, which makes Basic Training of the individual more efficient.
10 U.S. Code § 246 – Militia: composition and classes | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
There are some good judges in the circuit, but often if a decision goes against the lefties they will appeal for an “en banc” hearing.
.
I read the order from Judge Breyer when it was issued. A shockingly sloppy mess.
.
I have always appreciated your legal reviews. Care to share what you found so shockingly sloppy? I am interested.
noting: I had not expected this ruling. My prediction was that it was going to get caught up in a rolling appeals or some dodgy nationwide unjunction theatre to throttle the Presidents’ power to deploy the guard to protect the federal agents who are doing the work of arresting illegal criminals. I really thought that this one would become yet another lawfare game of slow rolling to delay and thwart President Trump. Thoughts on what next steps the lawfare types have up their sleeves?
God Bless America
I heard the way Breyer was analyzing whether it was a valid use of National Guard. You don’t have to be a law expert to know the guy was clueless. No offense but I was lucky to come across the video of the discussion.
Breyer made absolutely no sense.
ty ..I will read his “review” this weekend to get a taste of what dumb dumb wrote.
I would have expected nothing less. Must run in the family.
It was probably written by AI..
Lawfare continues to delay and deny President Trump his rights as President.
Our President has amazing patience, tenacity and courage.
MAGA
They got away with it in term 45 so why not rinse and repeat in term 47?
They aren’t denying him, they are denying ALL OF US.
What the uniparty doesn’t grasp, because they’re incapable of not thinking about themselves as the sole thing the sun revolves around , is that it’s not about one man. It’s all men who cherish freedom as much as they do being loved by The Father. Each and every injustice done to him is another slap across all of our faces.
There absolutely has to be real consequences for there to be Justice.
And plans…..I think.
Newsom was letting LA burn, businesses get destroyed!! Do Californiands recognize that?? Ir will they go and install Harris as the next Gov??
At this point, I think the political dynamics in California may be shifting.
lets count what has changed:
a. the DNC party unilaterally selected kowmala and denied any other qualified candidate to even run. and she lost in legendary fashion..there is great mistrust about the democratic party and its palpable.
b. President Trump has done MORE FOR CALIFORNIA than any other democrat in history. Not only in terms of securing their safety, but placing an emphasis in ensuring they are acutely aware that their so called leadership is not only careless, but complicit in the street violence.
c. newSCUM has been exposed for the worthless greasy twit he always was.
d. the fires in Malibu was preventable and everyone knows it. Accountability and measures to ensure this never happens have not even been discussed by the city or the state
e. californians continue to exodus the state searching for less regulation, more freedom, less burdensome taxes and costs, and quite frankly more peace and less traffic.
f. Californians are largely committed to the Democratic party because its been their meal ticket for decades. that money is now gone, long gone.
g. the Russia Russia hoax, Wuhan bioweapons program, and the election fraud is being revisited and it’s non trivial to see many people beginning to have doubts about former held views and opinions.
h. USAID and the abuse, waste and fraud is largely connected to the left democrat party…they own it. people in California and the entire united states cannot possibly ignore that level of money laundering and grift and think it doesn’t matter.
I. the legacy old guard democrat “icons” are either ending their careers or are about to go. And california is now poised to consider what their new leadership should be.
j. it’s 2025, california is a shell of its former economic self. there is no growth, few opportunities and the wealth gap is peak. The people demand to know how government has allowed this to happen. they will be interested in new ideas that do not involve old promises that never materialized.
k. environmental regulation has not realized ANY measurable differences in pollution control and new energy development that the typical main street citizens can point at. All they see is an enormous waste of time and resources (tax money) going to pet projects that have enriched wealthy donors to the Democratic party. they know they have been conned.
l. there is a growing interest in returning to the church and GOD.
m. there price for food, energy and services are staggeringly expensive ….there is no plan to mitigate this death spiral. people feel this pressure everyday, wondering if they can have a future that doesn’t involve being destitute.
n. tourism, once a major economic factor for CA GDP has dropped significantly. more people are aware that no one wants to visit california anymore. That has to take a toll on what one would or should have great pride.
o. violent gangs, antifa and illegal invaders have taken over the streets in many cities and law enforcement has done very little to push back on that. President Trump on the other hand is taking action…and it’s making a difference. No one can ignore this.
I have hopes for California…KNOW MANY PEOPLE THAT I CARE ABOUT THAT LIVE THERE. But at the end of the day, these people have important decisions to make. hanging on the democratic party is a losing proposition. it makes no sense at all, given the utter failures to lead and to development that state in a thriving economy. It’s in their hands to shape the government to their interests. Like all states must do, must accept.
God Bless America
Corrupt judges abusing the system, to delay and impede the will of The People.
Harry Potter doing nothing.
Gosh! A situation where they couldn’t twist the law into their favor. Lawfare must be cramming the backlogs of history wondering where they’d went wrong.
Another potential link in the chain. Earlier this week, raised the possibility that the information given to Tulsi for her congressional brief may have been intentionally wrong to setup the fall and ouster possibility raised by Sundance – and raising the question of WHO specifically provided said data.
Now that RATcliffe has stepped forward with “data showing Iran is just a few weeks away” from “da bomb” and going to the WH with it, we may have the answer as to WHO is involved in the palace plot. Didn’t trust Smiley the first go round and trust him even less the 2nd. Of course – it could be his team playing the games…
US President Donald Trump could fire Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard over a ( allegedly ) false report on Iran’s nuclear program.
According to CBS, CIA Director John Ratcliffe met with Trump at the White House and presented him with evidence that Iran is supposedly weeks away from having a nuclear bomb.
Oops…had wrong thread selected for this tidbit, my bad.
So Trump should fire the cabinet member who has done some good, as opposed to any of the Three Stooges who have done nothing?Eeeexcellent…
would be a huge mistake if POTUS fired Gabbard.
President Trump would be wise to not trust either of them
“According to CBS”
‘Nuff said.
The Rat definitely did what was said. The whole “might fire” part is just another bit of the psyop to try to push what the DS wants.
Newsome knew that this case was a non-starter. But he brought forward to court anyway, just for the publicity and bad press that would undoubtably be directed at President Trump.
And the time it wastes.
I suspect Newsome wanted the publicity for himself
How many “emergencies” will be polite enough to hold off until the “courts” get their ass in gear?
Is it me or when A Stay is issued by a Superior Court shouldn’t the Offending Lower Court Judge lose a paycheck or something?
I agree…these courts need the “3 strikes you’re out” rule imposed on them. Instead, they all meet up and belch down a bourbon together, pat each other on the back, sleep with each other’s wives…
In the case of the judge letting illegal criminal defendants out the back door of the courthouse, there should be no “immunity” for judges if they are breaking federal immigration laws in the commission of their crime of harboring criminals. Why is a criminal being let off without punishment? Aren’t we supposed to have “equal” protection under the law and equal access to the bar? Would that not require everyone in her court to be “let off” their criminal charges? Then, therfore, where does the “judging” take place?
And now her case has been removed from the docket. That is a case of more criminals being “let off” their charges. Let us just disband the courts as it seems to me they are worthless.
Solitary confinement and four years held without trial for the misdemeanor of “trespassing” when there was no signage stating the barrier, is a textbook example of judicial malpractice. This occurred hundreds of times in J6 cases.
Here’s what I see… and thank you for the tickler to check up on this….
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70255703/united-states-v-dugan/
Jun 18, 2025
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Lynn Adelman: In Person Status Conference as to Hannah C Dugan held on 6/18/2025. Court hears from parties regarding the 7/21/2025 jury trial date. Court will resolve the motion to dismiss first, then reset the jury trial date; 7/21/2025 jury trial vacated from calendar with no new date scheduled at this time. Court converts 7/9/2025 Final Pretrial Conference to a Scheduling/Status conference to discuss the status of the case and address additional scheduling. In Person Scheduling Conference set for 7/9/2025 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 390, 517 E Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53202 before Judge Lynn Adelman. (Court Reporter Jennifer Stake) (amh)
Now it’s time to get serious on these little jackboots. Rubber bullets ain’t getting it. We all want the violence stopped, so stop them with whatever you have, NG. They use explosives, you need to use a .308
Get them all out, Mr. President. Every last man woman and child. Leave not even a remnant.
weak or not
one can never trust the power
of the deep state
to threaten, blackmail or kill
after Obamacare being declared a tax
I find I cannot trust the Supreme Court to do its job
according to our laws and constitution
Frankly, it disappoints that the Court felt the need to AGREE with Trump that circumstances ALLOWED him to exercise his authority to Federalize the Guard. Since when does any President’s authority to call out the Guard requir a Court to agree with the reasons?
A President has this authority. Period. Every time a President exercises it a Court shouldn’t be weighing in to approve his reasoning or not.
I think POTUS, as a coequal branch of government, needs to come up with some novel ways to target Executive power at the judiciary. “Well, if we’re co-equal, and you can veto me, then I’m co-equal and here’s how I’m going to veto you.”
Then, thank John Roberts for reminding everyone that the President is equal to the courts, not subservient.
POTUS can do what Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln did and dare the courts to enforce their unconstitutional orders. I’m no lawyer so maybe I’m off base here.
Lincoln called a special session of Congress to convene 4 July 1861 and in his message to Congress asked them to pass a bill for suspension of habeas corpus which eventually they did. In the message his famous words “To state the question more directly, Are all the laws but one to go unexecuted, and the Government itself go to pieces lest that one be violated?”
It worked for Jackson and Lincoln.
I’m kind of wondering if POTUS isn’t just timing this right, if you catch me.
Well, you have to read the opinion. Note that for a stay a “final determination” isn’t required, just that there is a likelihood that defendants will prevail.
The real problem is with the entire concept of a “militia” which has been debated since the founding.
The Constitution vests the power in Congress “To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;”
In “calling forth” the Congress, by law, has delegated certain decision making to the President. Congress has specified conditions that must be met to “call forth”. Likewise the Constitution gives Congress power “for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States”.
So no. A President does not have this authority, period.
The flaw in your argument is that the National Guard is not the militia.
The courts will not weigh in with a Democrat in the White House.
The judiciary of the United States looks to becoming as dangerous as the US Congress. This “ruling”, while favorable, is worded such that it sounds almost accidental that the President has the right to nationalize the NG. The very term they use that “it seems likely” might be standard legalese, but it makes it sound like that they aren’t really sure.
These people have no spines, no guts, and aren’t worthy of their citizenship in a country built on God’s word giving one strength of character.
Breyer should be smacked down as well and removed from the bench for his idiotic and politicized issuing of his TRO.
When will the district judges who make things up be looked at for medical conditions IE dementia, or for political bias and be removed or censored? If a doctor is routinely misdiagnosing patients or creating casualties with his action, is there not a medical board that suspends him pending an investigation into his competence? Same with cops or military personnel. Are judges not held to a standard? If the politically motivated actions based on no law or precedent continue, why would anybody go before any judge? You might as well be tried like a person accused of witchcraft in the Middle Ages. Clearly, they are never embarrassed by anything they do.
An oft forgotten legacy of PDJT 45 is how he neutered the “Ninth Circus” which was once a reliably leftist court imposing the latest liberal fads and lunacies on America…
20 years ago, this ruling would have gone unanimously the other way.
Here in So Cal, my RING alert shows people reporting ICE activity and a phone number to call to alert obstructionists to go and hassle the ICE OFFICERS.
I wonder what would happen if people happened to call in false alarms? Get the obstructionists chasing ghosts.
That would be kinda funny, wouldn’t it?
Just sayin’’’
It’s not illegal to prank people. I bet they’re using Nextdoor, too.
Remember when I think it was New York that had a rat-line during COVID so everyone started calling it?
Nextdoor was a hotbed for snitches
Now POTUS SHOULD declare “ANTIFA, and any other NGO driven organizations (specifically the FBI) as “Domestic Terrorists” and deal with them using the “Full weight of federal law” to put them down for many years to come and as a continuing operation!
the U.S. government does not currently have a formal legal process for designating domestic organizations as terrorist organizations in the same way it does for foreign terrorist organizations. Instead of designating domestic groups, the focus is on prosecuting individuals who engage in acts of domestic terrorism under existing federal laws. Terrorism is using violence to force political change.
As of now, Congress has a bill pending to declare Antifa a domestic terrorist group.
Text – S.Res.279 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): A resolution calling for the designation of Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization. | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
Excellent News ! Lets get all of these illegals OUT. They are all criminals because they ALL broke the law when they crossed the border illegally. They are ALL criminals men women and children. GET OUT!!! MAGA
“We” grant the stay {begrudgingly}…
“We” disagree with Defendants argument…
Who is this “We” fraudulently usurping and assuming the unlawful authority to “rule” on matters far beyond every Constitutional limitation {chains of the Constitution} on the Judicial branch ?
Asking for a friend…
I still believe that Judge Breyer’s brother, Leftist Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, was the one who released the Dobbs Decision early to the media, thus overturning Roe v Wade. He was the only Justice that had nothing to lose since he was retiring from SCOTUS one month later. The internal investigation was later dropped by Justice Roberts( A coverup to protect the court).
Hopefully, the current FBI investigation by Kash Patel will get to the bottom of this, but I do not hold out any hope.
Kash is investigating the FBI? for what?
Director Patel and Deputy Director Bongino are running the investigation into the early release of the decision to the press.
FAFO
It would appear District Court Judge Charles Breyer isn’t even up to the level of his older brother, retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, who wasn’t such great shakes himself. (Both appointed by Clinton, although older brother Stephen was first appointed to the lower courts by Carter.)
It’s really, really simple.
And you’re all invited to use this truth on every occasion it presents itself because it eliminates the BS.
” Illegal is not a race ”
Thank you
“A common sense straightforward interpretation of the law.”
How rare and refreshing!
“protesters … threw ‘concrete chunks, bottles of liquid, and other objects’ at the officers”
One belt through an M60 would pretty much permanently stop it all.
Gruesome is a slimy hot mess.
This buffoon has handed a gift to America. I believe he has torched whatever chance he had of a viable run for president.
Incidents where he has callously, and recklessly demonstrated his indifference to his constituents continue to build.
Where are the millions that were donated for victims of the California fires?
.
How many millions, or billions, has been squandered on the railroad to nowhere?
Recently, his wine tasting event took precedence over the violent demonstrations in L.A.
Also, he refused the support of the California National Guard as discussed in this article. Thank God President Trump prevailed.
There is his infamous (unmasked) French Laundry dinner party– while the rest of California was masked and locked down.
The illegals keep pouring in, Newsome keeps acquiring property and wealth, and this once glorious state is bankrupt.
Gavin and Aunty Nancy need to join John McCain in whatever circle of Hades he inhabits
Pretty sure McCain’s been residing in the 9th Circle….”treachery”. 👺
🎯🇺🇲