Deputy U.S Attorney General Todd Blanche, United States Solicitor General D. John Sauer, and Dept of Justice Investigative Lead, Attorney Ed Martin, are very serious people in Main Justice.
The deliberate nature of the trio recently resulted in the Senate division of the weaponized DC system, rejecting the nomination of Ed Martin to lead the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Washington DC. The need for control is a reaction to fear. Apparently, the DeceptiCons were fraught.
DAG Blanche coordinates and prioritizes the day-to-day USAO office activity around the country. Blanche is the general in charge of eliminating Lawfare efforts. Solicitor General Sauer faces the Supreme Court. Sauer is the general in charge of framing the arguments from Blanche that reach the court. Meanwhile, DC USAO Martin, now with position changed to Presidential Appointment Martin in charge of investigating weaponized justice efforts, is the lead investigator on all enmeshed corruption within Washington DC.
Blanche, Sauer and Martin are serious and purposefully driven men.
In our discussions and outlines CTH does not trade in hopium, nor do we promote the popular albeit nonsensical and futile anticorruption efforts favored by most high-profile media types. The reality of the DC silo system is not easily understood, and that is entirely by design. High profiles may generate headlines, but do not generate adequate results as increasingly evidenced by AG Bondi, Director Patel and Deputy Bongino, all performers.
As the Washington DC USAO, Ed Martin was in position to address the known and documented activity of a variety of former DOJ officials. There’s a strong argument to be made that’s the reason why the DOJ’s corrupt allies in congress moved to eliminate the threat Martin represented. However, their collective result didn’t remove him, nor did it change the objective, it just changed Mr Martin’s title.
Whereas Washington DC USAO Ed Martin previously carried the authority of the Attorney General, in the changed dynamic special appointee ADAG Ed Martin now carries the authority of the President of the United States. A serendipitous outcome.
♦ Because there is so much confusion, a little background context is needed. You see, you might remember former Special Prosecutor John Durham who was appointed by former Attorney General Bill Barr. During his review of all ‘Russiagate’ matters, John Durham was never permitted to investigate anyone inside govt.
John Durham was given a very specific task and very specific guardrails he was not allowed to cross or touch. The guardrails are what created the outcome. The guardrails were put into place by AG Bill when he officially appointed him in October 19, 2020; five months after the initial request to begin review.
Politicians, political staff, members of the Obama administration, political appointees and any federal govt employee within any agency were off limits to Durham. During a conversation on August 18, 2020, Durham’s lead investigator Bill Aldenberg first admitted the limitations. No-one inside government could be investigated.
But FBI Agent Kevin Clinesmith, you say?
Great question.
Kevin Clinesmith, the FBI official who fabricated a CIA email to support the FISA application used against Carter Page, was an OIG criminal referral to Bill Barr and Main Justice from the DOJ Inspector General investigation into the Page FISA construct.
The IG referral by Michael Horowitz preceded John Durham’s appointment and was handed to Durham by AG Barr while being told the Clinesmith case would provide cover for the guardrails. In essence, Clinesmith would give the appearance that people inside govt were being held accountable by Main Justice through the John Durham special counsel. This was the intention of Bill Barr.
It was all a farce. The effect of Barr’s approach was to throw off, water down and diffuse criticism from President Trump for inaction by the DOJ about the fraudulent Crossfire Hurricane targeting operation. In essence, Bill Barr gave John Durham the Clinesmith case as a cover operation to protect govt officials.
To be fair, and in defense of his friend, John Durham would likely take issue with my characterization of his probe, yet he would admit the gist of his conversation with Barr (as relayed above) is essentially accurate.
Durham readily admitted his purview was limited to non-governmental participants. No one inside govt or the executive branch was ever investigated directly. Yes, their misconduct surfaced as an outcome of their contacts with Perkins Coie (one example), but those trails were never allowed to be followed.
Given the passage of time, this background is generally a moot point; I am only sharing it again for the sake of clarity. The key point is that govt participants were never investigated by John Durham, and a full accounting of the corrupt players was never made public.
♦ Now, back to the matter at hand.
WASHINGTON DC – […] Martin has spent months leveraging his perch as top federal DC prosecutor and quietly operating as a tip of the spear in the administration’s war against Russiagate villains, Capitol riot prosecutions and lawfare, The Post has learned.
Now that his responsibilities have been sharpened, Martin anticipates there “may be no limit to the targets” the Justice Department’s Weaponization Working Group will pursue under his watch, since there “was no limit to the weaponization.”
“It’s a nationwide and frankly, international docket where the government was used against the citizens, where the government was weaponized,” Martin told The Post about his plans for the weaponization working group. “Sometimes there’ll be crimes involved, in which case we’ll prosecute. Sometimes there’ll be just the need to make clear this is not how it’s supposed to go.”
Shortly after Trump tapped him as interim US attorney for the District of Columbia, a post that expires on May 20, Martin quickly demoted over half a dozen prosecutors involved with Capitol riot cases and fired off investigatory letters to key Russiagate actors.
This includes Andrew Weissman, the Mueller probe “pitbull;” Mary McCord, who oversaw DOJ’s sprawling probe into possible Trump-Russia ties; Aaron Zelinsky, another Mueller probe prosecutor; and Charles McGonigal, a former FBI special agent in charge who also worked on the Russia probe of the Trump campaign.
[…] The DOJ’s Weaponization Working Group was established in February by Attorney General Pam Bondi in response to an executive order from Trump to root out remnants of lawfare and hold key perpetrators accountable.
Martin was an early member of the group, and now, as its leader, he will report to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. He has also been tapped to serve as pardon attorney.
“The truth is important, and we need it,” Martin reflected about his new role. “We need to move forward. But then, after the truth is known, we need to hold those accountable that did the wrongdoing, and we need to also help those who are victims. We have both of those obligations.” (link)
We deserve an honest reckoning for what took place.
The value of investigating “what took place” is not to gain any indictment for the participants; indeed, the statute of limitations has long expired; the optimal value within the investigation itself is to knock all those DC creatures off their high-horse and face the full fury of the public.
Sunlight is the best disinfectant!
SD, brilliant analysis, you opened my eyes with this article.
Seems as though great credit is due to AG Bondi and PDJT that their plan begun in Feb is coming together so well! AG Bondi now has these very serious people reporting directly to her in these critical areas. And the best is yet to come! 🇺🇸
Why has Pan Bondi allowed Maurene Comey (James Comey’s daughter) to remain in the DOJ? She is clearly a fixer. She is assigned to cases that threaten deep state elites, Epstein, Maxwell, and now, Combs, with the mission of destroying the cases. For that matter, who is making these assignments, and why are THEY still employed at the DOJ?
Who is Bondi taking her orders from? Bondi is a woman who discussed non public information about the Epstein case with a complete stranger, in a restaurant (James O’Keefe’s undercover investigator). It’s hard to imagine her actually in control of the DOJ.
ONLY thing I see Bondi interested in is being on FN everyday…..the lights, the camera, the action. She’s a ‘show’ girl. NOT seen one iota of any legal action from her.
Do you picture the Attorney General’s job as doing crime scene investigations or actually reading through incriminating files, going down to the courthouse to file paperwork and interviewing perps? She’s the boss. She has “people” to do that.
Which is why (as most business people know), you don’t put your overt pitbulls in administrative positions, nor your prime administrators/ managers in a pitbull role.
Bondi is not an admin type, and it’s essential that agency heads BE that kind of person … Who knows how to get the best out of their employees, how to match up skills w/tasks, meet deadlines, keep the machinery functioning at a high level. It’s a gift in itself. She doesn’t have it.
I think Martin does. I think she might actually be relieved to have someone of his skillet & experience to do what she can’t, and shield her from the results of her own incompetence.
My 2 cents.
Bondi is on FOX for 1 reason: auditioning for a billionaire husband!
Because Bondi is performative, placed there by Trump to perform, not to do anything. That is the point Sundance is making over and over, in this post and many others.
Perhaps the appointment of all the TV performers in these key positions rather than serious, experienced people was a nodd to the DS? Perhaps that is why the assassination attempts against the POTUS seem to have stopped? We know it’s not because the Secret Service have gotten better at their jobs. After all the buffoonery we’ve witnessed, and now allowing access to Kristi Noem, so two illegals could steal her handbag in a restaurant, this agency has become a joke.
it’s possible Comey’s kid is there so the good guys can follow her breadcrumbs to other crimes and criminals.
Keep your friends close and….
Bondi only mentioned to the woman in that restaurant what is talked about every single day here at The Treehouse. Bondi gave the woman no details and spoke in generalities.
Can you define “best,” please? The point Sundance is making is that the “best” that will happen is like sternly worded letters, not indictments. And anyone who thinks otherwise is mistaken.
AG Blondie deserves no credit whatsoever. She established the working group in response to an explicit order from President Trump. A trained monkey could have done that.
My guess is that President Trump had to make certain deals with the Sea Island cabal and that Blondie the Clown was part of the deal. She can carry on with all of the performance art her devious little heart desires, while the real work is accomplished by this work group.
Blanche, Sauer and Martin may be below Blondie on the organizational depth chart, but they are the true leaders of the department.
May God bless their efforts.
I think you nailed it
So you disagree with Sundance who is saying and has said that your interpretation of things is smoking hopium. Trump himself has no intention of prosecuting past corruption. Trump put Bondi there knowing exactly what Bondi would do, nothing, not anything Trump supporters dream about.
People are making up fantasies about what Trump said he will do, intended to do, and is doing. Martin will hold people “accountable,” meaning he will issue a sternly worded account of what they did. How many times does Sundance have to say this before people will start listening? And if they voted for Trump based on hopium, then they are 100% to blame for their silliness/stupidity.
Careful! There shall be no praise or recognition of AG Bondi on this site! … Auh because!
Yes, she will shame them til their faces turn red.
Kind of skeptical,, but,, hope springs eternal
I am more than kind of skeptical.
But like you, I am hopeful.
I worked in DC and got a peek behind the scenes a few times.
That is the reason for my skepticism.
And if they spend a fortune on lawyers trying to squash subpoenas, great! And if they commit perjury attempting to cover up the past, great! And at the end, publish all the testimony. Total sunlight.
And OBTW, if he’s acting on behalf of PDJT…defying data request, eg the IC, can lead to obstruction of justice charges. That’s how you smash the silos.
So treason has a statute of limitations?
N0 !
No, Trump just does not intend to prosecute treason. That is what Sundance is saying, and has said many times.
Then all of this is just a colossal waste of time.
yeah, that’s what I was wondering…
What is the Statute of Limitations on Seditious Conspiracy to overthrow the elected President of the United States? It started when? 2015? Only ten years.
Let’s call our representatives to undo this law. They put it in place for a reason!
Without prosecution of the corrupt criminals there are no consequences. Without consequences there is no deterrence to prevent it from happening again in the future. You really think the Dems/RINOs/Deep State won’t do the same lawfare to any GOP presidential candidate they don’t like?
Only low hanging fruit ever gets to go to jail and even then it is only ceremonial. Unless they happen to threaten the IC or need to be made an example of.
Bob Menendez (sr)
But Trump NEVER promised or implied that he was going to do anything about that stuff!
As long as the Fourth Column ,the EneMEDIA propagandists to push the narrative ,to persecute their political opponents, the lawfare will continue.
WTF ? There is no statute of Limitations on TREAS0N !
.
There’s no statute of limitations, but the problem would seem to be the legal definitions of “treason” and of “enemies of the United States”.
18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
—
Similar issues with “seditious conspiracy”, which requires “force” (how much? implies something substantial).
18 U.S. Code § 2384 – Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
.
So it would seem by that last paragraph that the majority of the government is guilty.
And by the way I think we owe the Rosenbergs an apology because they were executed for far less than many today are getting away with. Looking at you Bill Clinton and Joe Biden!
If they can’t be prosecuted maybe citizens can introduce the perpetrators to some tar and feathers or something smaller and faster… Just thinking out loud here…
Can a personal lawsuit not be brought against those who are obviously guilty for damages of some nature or the other? How about losing their professional licence?
Why is it that protagonists of the Uniparty are always so creative with their use of the legal system, whilst MAGA seem not to be?
“Why is it that protagonists of the Uniparty are always so creative with their use of the legal system, whilst MAGA seem not to be?”
I think you’re catching on to the plot of the UniParty Kabuki Theater. Meanwhile the Grift continues… Why do the “Representatives” gain a shocking amount of wealth than from their net worth when they entered into Congress? Do you remember when AOC started out she was complaining she didn’t make enough to pay her rent in DC? Now she is a multi-millionaire. It would take minimal effort by the DOJ, FBI, IRS to track the money laundering, but they don’t care to spend one iota of time on this. As long as the price is right.
Better to complain to our “reps” about the statute of limitations.
Great article. But I do not believe treason has a statute of limitations. With Russiagate there were other countries involved and they conspired to overthrow our duly elected President. Call it a coup de tat, or treason. I don’t believe there is a statute of limitations for this.
One of your best posts for clarity, new information. You need to get that out there. Push it out.
“The value of investigating “what took place” is not to gain any indictment for the participants; indeed, the statute of limitations has long expired; the optimal value within the investigation itself is to knock all those DC creatures off their high-horse and face the full fury of the public.”
So we’re expected to just sit back and watch as these cretins walk away scot-free?
“…………knock all those DC creatures off their high-horse………..”
I suspect many here would prefer there’s a rope placed around their neck first, leading up to a stout tree branch. It may be a high horse, but it need only be a short drop.
Biggest problem is half the general pop has blinders on
For at least some, they are self-imposed. Some serious exposure to sunlight will cause at least some to cast off the blinders and see the true light. We can hope, can’t we?
They have 2, 5-and 7 on.
The argument here sounds like the Jeff Session debate years ago.
Same conversation different players. Reality is the IC thrives with the
distraction. You all are falling for it, Again.
Was Carter page a plant from the CIA into the Trump orbit? I thought he sued someone but I haven’t heard anything about it lately. Does anyone know?
JUDGE Made the Decision…
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/trump-appointed-judge-dismisses-carter-page-lawsuit-against-the-fbi-despite-finding-little-question-agency-engaged-in-wrongdoing/
.
Yes.
.
Hopefully every one will tell a lie that can be substantiated.
I disagree about the statute of limitations, Sundance. If Alvin Bragg has taught us anything it’s that statute of limitations is a minor nuisance easily overcome.
If they lie under oath or obfuscate, deny or obstruct justice these are certainly *new* crimes worthy of prosecution. Aren’t they?
🎯
Thank you.
I don’t want our laws tanked just because fat Alvin got away with it. Now there’s a guy I’d like to see sued into oblivion.
“Blanche, Sauer and Martin are serious and purposefully driven men.” – Sundance
I agree. But I just don’t believe they will have much success bringing indictments let alone getting convictions with lengthy jail time in the corrupt DC District Court!!! I don’t believe there is a statute of limitations on treason or malfeasance? Anyone here believe Judge Boasberg is going to let President Trump’s men “knock all those DC creatures off their high-horse and face the full fury of the public”? Lawfare will bring suits to shut down their investigations and the IC run mockingbird msm will not report on the investigations! It’s called Judicial supremacy!!! But I do want to see them try and pray for their success!!!
You have to start somewhere
Treason is judged by a military tribunal isn’t it?
‘High profiles may generate headlines, but do not generate adequate results as increasingly evidenced by AG Bondi, Director Patel and Deputy Bongino, all performers.’
True. What has been amazing to me though is the fact that Tulsi Gabbard seems to be the most tenacious and productive of all the new appointments. I think maybe the ax she has to grind against her former democrat cohorts has a lot of sharpening left to come.
Thank you Sundance
Well, I for one am happy to hear that happening there “are serious people” doing yeoman’s work. It’s a reassuring post.
Bondi, Kash and Dan can do the red carpet walk all they want and we’ll let the Untouchables kick the crap out of McCord, Weismann et Al!
Sundance is saying that NOBODY is going to kick the crap out of anybody, and that Trump saying “drain the swamp” and talking about the evil people did NOT mean that he was going to do anything about it!
Trump has promised performer clowns and strongly worded letters, as Sundance has said many times over, and people who think otherwise have a psychological problem with the issue, projection.
Exposure is what Trump means by draining the swamp.
Correct, nobody pays a price, per Trump.
It’s “President Trump”. I don’t agree with your assessment of what President Trump is saying or doing and if Sundance is saying that, which I don’t interpret the same as you do, than Sundance is flat out wrong.
I hope he does well.
SD, would love to know your thoughts on Judge Jeanine
Why has Todd Blanche allowed Maurene Comey (James Comey’s daughter) been allowed to remain in the DOJ? She is clearly a fixer. She is assigned to cases that threaten deep state elites, Epstein, Maxwell, and now, Combs, with the mission of destroying the cases. For that matter, who is making these assignments, and why are they still employed at the DOJ?
It would be nice for some sunlight to shine on Mark Elias and Norm Eisen, who are instrumental in many of the legal cases that are now impeding Trump’s plans.
Elias CHANGED politics and had free reign. He seems to be off the grid? Let’s find him and connect ALL the dots.
Trump likes his chess game. I see a pattern that stemmed from his first term where he would nominate someone (knowing they would be rejected) and then put someone in their place that was equally as effective or more so (and they were already appointed for another position, Grenell comes to mind). So he appoints an interim candidate which requires no approval, giving him time to find someone else or perhaps keep appointing interims to achieve his objectives. The rejection of Martin by Thom Tillis just put the spotlight on Tillis in not a good way, and Trump still gets to move forward from a different angle. He did something similar with Walz and Rubio getting them off the SSCI committee. Now W is in a useless UN position (previously NSA lead which was probably used to entice him to leave the Senate fro a better replacement) and Rubio seems to be taking his SoS roll quite well. Smart chess moves. I seem to recall Tillis did some damaging things during T’s first term to prevent nominations from happening as well.
We will see but no longer wait with bated breath.
The full fury of the public should be civil suits to bankrupt the DC creatures.
Justice would be what the J6 political prisoners got, only at Gitmo.
Back in the day street justice would be getting tarred and feathered by an angry mob.
My hometown of St. Louis , Missouri is where Ed Martin is from too……SHOW EM’ Ed!
I hope people understand what Sundance is saying here. No Russiagate prosecutions, no Fauci, no Schiff or intelligence committee, no J6, no border treason, nothing. And Sundance is quoting Martin as soft-pedaling all of that stuff.
What Sundance did no explicitly say, as he has said before, is that people who believed those things were silly to believe that “drain the swamp” and daily criticism of those things meant that any of those things were going to be prosecuted. IOW, Trump consciously hired performative people to perform, not to indict.
And, as Sundance has said before, people who believed those things are silly, victims of their own wild imaginings (stupidity, in effect). Anyone who wildly imagined Schiff paying a price for his one man debasement of America is a fool, a dimwit, mentally unstable, all the things that silly means under the circumstances.
So, to be clear, when President Trump said and says “drain the swamp,” he means something like praying very hard against the powers and principalities. He does not mean RICO, or even trespassing charges. He has tariffs to worry about. Trump campaigning against the stolen elections etc etc, only meant that he was philosophically opposed to such criminality, not that he intended to do anything about it.
And the main point is, as Sundance has said, anyone who believed differently suffers from a psychological deficiency, stupidly projecting their own truncated, blinkered view of existence onto Trump, who never intended to suggest, imply, or encourage such ravings.
“With Watergate it was the coverup that turned out to be the far bigger crime. With Hillarygate it is the Mainstream Media Coverup that is almost as big of a crime as the act of treasonous espionage itself. It is showing the world why our media is truly the enemy of the people!”
–Donald J. Trump Feb. 16, 2022
“During the course of my administration, and in order to disturb it, the artillery of the press has been leveled against us, charged with whatsoever its licentiousness could devise or dare… but public duties more urgent press on the time of public servants, and the offenders have therefore been left to find their punishment in the public indignation.”
–Thomas Jefferson, 2nd Inaugural Address, 1805
Build Back Treason – DNC2026
“Democrats are taking Joe Biden to task for appearances in the media this week, which they say only reminds everyone why the party is in trouble and why voters elected Donald Trump.”
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/05/09/dems-want-biden-out-of-spotlight/
Sincerely trying to understand if you are agreeing with Sundance or disagreeing.
The two inter-related points are that Trump never intended to prosecute treason, and that people who thought he would prosecute suffer from a mental/psychological/intellectual disability where they project their own wild imaginings onto Trump.
So when Martin says people will be held “accountable,” he means like an account in a strongly worded letter. As Sundance says in this post, an account will be told about some people, not RICO.
People have to confront their own silliness and honestly assess how they became so confused.
What ever is your obsession with anyone agreeing or disagreeing with Sundance?
You seem to be “projecting your own wild imaginings onto Sundance”?
Are you trying to categorize people here as “Trump People” or “Sundance People”? I love them both. Neither one is perfect but I will give unto Caesar what is Caesar’s etc.
TY for asking.
I respect Sundance’s opinion tremendously, always have. I thought his Benghazi Brief was one of the most utterly brilliant assessments written on an historic matter, so much so I was convinced (wrongly) that the Brief would have a far more consequential effect than it did.
Sundance disdains and mocks those who think Trump intends to prosecute past corruption. He thinks they are “silly” and the sort of unmoored wackos who project their wild fantasies onto Trump without any rational basis.
This, IMO, is an incredibly significant issue for Trump and for our side. Millions and millions of Trump supporters took something away from Trump’s reiteration of “drain the swamp” and the daily focus (before the election) on the various issues of not just corruption, but genuine evil and deliberate attempts to destroy America. They reasoned (IMO) that a man could not possibly be talking about the things he was stressing while simultaneously having zero intention of doing anything about it. “Hey folks, just because I am constantly railing against the destruction of America, PLEASE do not get the impression I intend to make anybody pay for it.”
Even now, Trump supporters (like me) are guessing when and how Trump will make someone pay. Look at the various surmises and explanations why it is not happening. All just guessing and hopeful speculation. You see that from many people on this site, and many people on sites like twitter. There is an powerful, explosive segment of MAGA, probably the vast majority, who are still confident Trump will make someone pay.
IOW many, many millions of people will be wondering how they so radically misinterpreted “drain the swamp” and the relentless focus on evil people.
Sundance has said that these people have nobody to blame but themselves. They are silly, and stupidly projected their own baseless fantasies onto Trump’s words. Trump is 100% free from any responsibility for how people interpret what he said, according to Sundance.
JMHO, but this might come as a shock and a surprise to those millions. They might even (totally mistaken because they are lunatics) a little betrayed (wrongly, absolutely wrongly).
So you see, the silliness and stupidity that made them misinterpret what Trump was saying, might also make them feel a silly and stupid sense of betrayal. The only solution for this problem apparently is to further mock them for their feelings.
If someone as astute as Sundance evaluates Trump supporters in such a denigrating manner, that means Trump may have a problem. That is what concerns me. People do not like to be mocked, insulted, taken for granted and belittled, even if they are 100% wrong. Especially when their error arises out of a genuine genuine (albeit mistaken) admiration for the mocker.
Part of the problem is that We the People find revenge an enticing motivation to act. I suspect that President Trump has a different agenda, namely the desire to improve the lot of the middle class. That’s why I voted for him twice. He knows that he has a limited time left to accomplish those MAGA goals, less than 1 term, and much to do. This second term is Trump’s Presidency, and he’s calling all the shots including appointing the performers. I have to presume that he planned things exactly in this way.
I reread SD’s article and followed the links to his meeting with Aldenberg and reread all of that. I would agree with you about the “no charges” point. I also agree that SD has repeatedly warned us about expecting anything like real accountability (i.e. prosecutions and jail time).
I don’t think I would agree that those of us who refuse to give up hope are mentally unstable. I have followed SD’s advice from long ago to “live your best life”. I still have hope, but not “hopium”. I have hope that more people will see the truth about the corruption, and the more people wake up, the more we can learn to stop fighting each other and figure out the best way to fight our corrupt leaders. Not sure what the fight would entail, but I’m not talking about burning down our country.
You make a good point about President Trump being focused on the tariffs. My guess is he is being practical and trying very hard to make America great again. He is a businessman, and his goal is to bring prosperity back to this country. (IMO)
Also, I think he knows he can’t work miracles. But I know Someone who can. I put my hope in Him.
On his twitter feed for May 6 (IIRC) Sundance unmistakably and explicitly denigrated people who thought that Trump ever intended to prosecute the Faucis and Schiffs of the world. I suppose everyone would have to read what he said to draw their own conclusions.
He said people were “silly” for believing Trump would do anything or ever even suggested he would do such a thing. He said those people were imagining things, using the psychological term “projection.”
Now, it is true, Sundance did not say anything about what “drain the swamp” meant, or what Trump’s relentless focus before the election on the evil corruption meant, but whatever they mean Sundance stated in effect that Trump had zero responsibility for people believing that Trump would do anything about those things.
And Sundance was quite derogatory, belittling, and condescending toward those people who were as he said “projecting.” So I think he was serious. It’s all in the twitter thread.
Personally, I wonder how it will be explained to Trump’s supporters how they got so confused. Completely exonerating Trump ought to be done with some understanding as to how his supporters misunderstood what he was saying.
And commentators everywhere ought to consider how embarrassing, naive, and just plain stupid they are, even if no one is telling them so directly.
SD has always been honest and open with us. My eyes have been opened the more I read here. I appreciate your comments because they did prompt me to go back and reread things.
President Trump will get what needs to be done in whatever order facilitates accomplishing that. If he needs to avoid pissing off some RINOs or Democrats in the short term than President Trump will evaluate the situation and get things done.
You people in the cheap seats can’t know a tenth of what President Trump knows, you just think you do.
Sundance is a wily character in his own right and keeps us informed but he’s not god.
So the get away with fabricating evidence to take down a sitting president because of a statute of limitations? They get away with prosecuting people for sedition? This is certainly much better then nothing but is far from being enough.
Todd Blanche was on Fox last night (I think ‘the Big Weekend Show’). They asked ?’s about Leticia James and the NJ mayor who was arrested breaking into an ICE facility. Todd wouldn’t give any info because of the ongoing investigations, but I think that’s a good thing. He’s serious about his job.
“..The value of investigating “what took place” is not to gain any indictment for the participants; indeed, the statute of limitations has long expired; the optimal value within the investigation itself is to knock all those DC creatures off their high-horse and face the full fury of the public.”
Yes, once and for all bright sunshine needs to be focused on the wrongdoers and the victims of their nefarious and life
destroying actions.
Don’t need hopium here, I think we will indeed see results.
Thank you Sundance!
i don’t know how long the SOL is for RICO crimes, but wouldn’t the US DOJ involvement with Alvin Bragg, Fani Willis and Leticia James’ prosecutions against PDJT still be active?
Let the Games begin…
So, let’s pretend nothing will happen to any of them. Nothing, nada for any past crimes. How about new ones? Are we to believe that this Bondi/Kash/Bongino trio will let any new crimes go forth as well? What happened the other day with raiding the ICE facility..will anything happen there? Cause I gotta tell you, if I have to eat 10+ years of crimes I at least have to know that any NEW stuff will be perp walked and prosecuted…
AGAIN…expecting a bunch of attorneys occupying the top tiers of government, where lines don’t exist between practicing law and BEING THE LAW, to subject each other to frogmarches and handcuffs is basically a fool’s errand. I remember Brett Tolman, an ex-DOJ USA-Utah district, explaining how it’s basically impossible to prosecute attorneys functioning in the capacity of representing the Federal government. I believe this is the point Sundance is making, that “draining the swamp” isn’t about accountability, rather exposing THEN DISMANTLING the abomination as it exists today.
It was NEVER Trump’s mandate to punish corrupt government, that was OUR JOB, WeThePeople, and we’ve failed that test by abdicating responsibility over and over again through apathy and ignorance.
WE HAVE THE GOVERNMENT WE DESERVE, so stop blaming Trump for the system WE ENABLED, and be grateful we get this opportunity to remediate
“Like” ! You’re not fitting here today. You have common sense and think too clearly!
Sundance,
Thank you very much for writing this invaluable piece.
I’ve been visiting this site for a decade. Information gleaned then leveraged in my life – such as moving my IRA/401k to a US only portfolio when AMLO was elected and you said therefore NAFTA and its loophole is toast in 6-8 months so US manufacturing investment and output and $ repatriation via an FTA with Mexico would explode….that paid dividends. But I digress.
We all lived through the farce of Barr and Durham. With what you outlined in this article some justice is finally coming.
Of course Mary McCord won’t be suited up in orange, but she will be exposed and pay the price for it. Her value in the DC criminal world reduced to zero. Same with Weissmann. I’m
Sundance, Well this sucks, no criminal charges as the statute of limitations have expired. So why bother? Geesh, pull a democrat lawfare gambit and make up a crime that these buggers have done. Seriously, a public shaming is the best that can be done to those who conspired to overthrow our government?
You can jolly-well believe that, if the circumstances were reversed, the left would not have any problem whatsoever throwing the book at the deplorables – but we are too “refined” and/or too lazy to even try? And BTW I thought treason had no “statute of limitations.”
“Whereas Washington DC USAO Ed Martin previously carried the authority of the Attorney General, in the changed dynamic special appointee ADAG Ed Martin now carries the authority of the President of the United States. A serendipitous outcome.”…….
“As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, to bring it about that many people should be kept alive, as they are today.”–Genesis 50:20
Thank You, Good Father!
Very informative article!
Everyone is looking for Kash and Bongino to make arrests but it is this working group that is building the case against the real criminals. The case has to be made first.
Let’s see what they put together I can wait for that
“Like” !
“The statute of limitations has long expired,” Treason should have no statute of limitations.
Sundance, you close your posting with:
“The value of investigating “what took place” is not to gain any indictment for the participants; indeed, the statute of limitations has long expired; the optimal value within the investigation itself is to knock all those DC creatures off their high-horse and face the full fury of the public.
Sunlight is the best disinfectant!”
____________________________
With respect:
Sunlight may be the best disinfectant but it is not the best method of law & order to use….. for Americans who deserve and demand Constitutional justice for the democrat / RINO men and women who committed the treasonous 1/6/21 coup d’état against our Constitutional Republic, the Constitution and our President Trump as well as the 4 year continued weaponization of the federal government against all Americans.
Nope.
Multiple thousands of Executive Branch employees (DOJ, FBI, ATF, CIA, ETC) …… over the past 8 years …… were and continue to be involved in the treasonous acts against our Constitutional Republic, the Constitution and our President Trump.
It is day 112 of the 2025 President Trump Executive Branch and the vast majority of those traitors ……. are still in the Executive Branch ……. practicing their globalist / communist crimes and disrupting and delaying President Trump’s plans.
Your “indeed, the statute of limitations has long expired;” sounds “Comeyness” of yore.
It has become obvious that AG Bondi, Director Patel and Deputy Bongino are complicit in the continued weaponization of the federal government against Americans and they must be replaced, yesterday.
Mass firings, for cause, of the multiple thousands of traitors in the Executive Branch (DOJ, FBI, ATF, CIA, ETC) are 111 days late.
Americans know it, expected it, demand it and your attempt to gloss over the current situation looks a lot like a “bondo job” of yore.
MAGA isn’t just our motto, it is our duty.
The MAGA / America First movement has the numerical, economic, moral, intellect and armed majorities in America and we did not disband on 11/5/24 …. and we are fully behind the promises that President Trump made during his 4 year campaign to “catch and punish the crooks and return the diamonds to the jewelry store”.
The treasonous crimes of the current and previous Executive Branch traitors have no Constitutional statute of limitation ….. the only thing standing between them and justice is b-bondi, patel and b-gone. Adding 3 more lawyers into the mix / mess will only delay justice …….. justice delayed is justice denied.
Confusing activity with progress ……. will fool some ….. but it is no substitute for winning …… which has been the standard that President Trump has set for the past 4 years.
Sadly, because of “law”, many people who deserve the rope will only have to endure a little scolding for only as long as it takes the Big Money/Big Media/Legal Guild colluders to dupe the public into re-electing Uniparty, NWO government. Trump isn’t forever and when he leaves, MAGA will be mercilessly hammered by those internationally powerful schemers.
“Hopium” is thinking that the public will be convinced of how devious leftists are, and will vote all the swamp-complicit Uniparty politicians out. If this administration doesn’t lay some serious consequences on the guilty, America is lost .. and with her, the world.
dollops,
Thanks for the comment.
You are absolutely right: ” lay some serious consequences on the guilty,.”
In addition to that, dismantle the illegal, unconstitutional funding operations that have been built up in the Executive Branch over the past 100 years and take over many of the state RINO operations and replace them with MAGAs.
We have 4 years to accomplish the re-taking of our federal government from the globalist / communists who have infiltrated it.
We fought and fully defeated two dangerous enemies during WWII across two oceans within 3 years and 9 months. The job facing Americans is doable and it will get done.
The MAGA / America First movement has the numerical, economic, moral, intellect and armed majorities in America and the best leader President Trump.
Have a great MAGA DAY!
“Like” !
Well said. If President Trump does not bring justice to the traitors, they will be emboldened to continue their treason because now they know there will not be any accountability. This is just setting the table for this treachery to continue in our country. How can we (MAGA) allow this to happen? Was Trump simply saying what he thought we all wanted to hear or is this the new normal and we never believe anything any candidate in the future says? Maybe Trump is just waiting for something we don’t know about – but maybe this is all that’s going to happen. What then?
Joan,
Thanks for the comment.
President Trump is making some moves in the right direction ….. indicating that he is still committed to firing all of the Executive Branch employees who tried to destroy our Constitutional Republic, the Constitution and President Trump. Which means “We the people” don’t have to settle for anything less like “not prosecuting the guilty.”
He has earned the right to decide exactly when and with whom he will make the moves. He owns the Executive Branch, lock, stock & barrel, which means he has all the departments and employees within the Executive Branch to execute the moves. He doesn’t have to ask any stinkin’ congressman, senator or jurist to do it.
He has already moved the ATF over to the Dept. of Defense as well moving the investigation and issuing of the security clearances for most of the Executive Branch employees over to the Dept. of Defense.
So, he has shown that he has that type of flexibility to move the treasonous operations out from underneath the DOJ.
He is the boss so it will be up to him to determine when those future moves will be made …… but, he has shown, he will make them and clean the traitors out of the Executive Branch, as he promised.
Have a great MAGA DAY.
Statute of limitations? The clock starts when the criminal activities END, not when they began. I would argue that they continue to this day
Those men are serious enough to know that it’s not what they know but what they can prove in the arena of a corrupt Judiciary.
re: ” arena of a corrupt Judiciary.”
President Thomas Jefferson was a serious, smart, constitutionally wise gentleman and wrote:
“A strict observance of the written law is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to the written law, would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the ends to the means.” (1,2)
footnotes:
^ Jefferson, Writings (Washington Ed. of 1853), vol. 5, p. 542.^ Brest, Paul; Sanford Levinson; Jack M. Balkin; Akhil Reed Amar; Reva B. Seigel (2006). Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking: Cases and Materials (Print) (6th ed.). New York: Aspen. pp. 65–67. ISBN 978-0735550629._____________________________________________________
Thomas Jefferson knew that at some point in the future, traitors would take over the functions of the federal government including the courts.
Their faux legal actions/rulings/laws don’t require a strict adherence to them, but there must be strict adherence to the original Constitution, aka “full Constitutional Republic mandate.”
President Trump must follow his oath, but not unconstitutional rulings from a jurist exceeding his authority.
I suppose there’s so much going on in real time that needs immediate attention.
Perhaps we should be satisfied we have an administration comprised of individuals who fully intended on exposing the fraud and the corruption only.
Let the public decide how they will handle them. Perhaps voting them out of office and publicly shaming and rejection is up to us.
We count too much on others to do the job we should have been doing ourselves.
Which was paying attention to our employees in Federal Government and holding them accountable. That we didn’t do now a corrupt system has formed in government that is totally for themselves.
Hopefully when enough Americans see the exposure they will decide judgment upon the corruption.
Trump will expose it the people will have to decide how they gonna respond.
Oh yes there are laws against corruption we can insist they be enforced.
What a difference it would have been if Ed Martin had been selected for AG or Director of the FBI instead of the cardboard cutouts presently occupying the offices. Of course, Fox News would have a huge hole in their lineups, and the nation would be saving lots of money on jet fuel without Kash flying to sports events and visiting his girlfriend in Nashville.
Remember when Comey stated that he set up Flynn? And the audience laughs and applauds?
Sundance, are you saying they will face no legal consequences because of statute of limitations running out?
The scenario put forth by Sundance in this post reminds me of an old Itchy and Scratchy Show episode from The Simpsons cartoons.
Think of Itchy (the mouse) as the govt, and Scratchy (the cat) as we the people.
Here is the Itchy and Scratchy short titled “The Tears of a Clone”.
People here should click on the Disney – Rachel Zegler – “Snow White” link and enjoy a great 23 minute video about the outcome of that Disney poison. You will smile for 23 minutes. Everyone loves for a bully to get her comeuppance.
IMO… it would be a complete waste of time, but thanks anyway.
It’s enough for me to know the “woke” remake of a classic film failed Bigly.
P.S. There are far better ways to find happiness and joy. I personally prefer fishing, hunting, BBQ with friends and family, and other things like that. No time or inclination to focus on the so-called “stars” 😉