After twenty years in congress, Curt Weldon was about to become chairman of the House Armed Services Committee when he publicly questioned the accuracy of the 9-11 report. In retaliation, the Bush administration sent federal agents to his daughter’s house and ended his political career. At 77, Weldon has decided to tell the truth about what actually happened on September 11, 2001. WATCH:
Chapters:
0:00 Introduction
2:33 Why Did They Oust Weldon?
7:12 Could the CIA Have Prevented 9-11?
16:00 How the FBI Tried to Intimidate Weldon
19:23 Did the CIA Lie About Osama bin Laden’s Location?
25:47 The Real Culprit Behind America’s Wars in the Middle East
31:27 Trump’s Biggest Challenge Right Now
33:11 How the Deep State Undermined Weldon’s Political Career
43:16 Will Weldon Be Killed for Speaking Out?
48:04 Why Hillary Clinton Had to Take Down Gaddafi
49:31 The 9-11 Commission Was a Scam
55:17 The Mysterious Collapse of Building 7
1:05:13 How Will This Revelation Impact America’s Future?
1:07:56 The Bush Administration and China
1:14:32 Why Politicians Are So Scared of Declassifying 9-11 Documents
1:20:14 Where Can Americans Find the Truth About 9-11?
This guy in some ways sounds as bad as those who he calls out.
I found his excuse for having lost his campaign to be lame. His daughter gets raided by the FBI( ok that sucks, no doubt) but then he just decides to fold up his tent, pull his ad buys, and meekly hesd off into the sunset.
Where was his spine then, not now, when it largely doesn’t matter.
Easy to say now. Not so easy back then in a completely different climate. It’s like saying why are you not speaking up against the Reichskristallnacht in 1933.
yes, I recall W had an 80 or 90% approval for many months after 9/11
W’s performance during that national trauma was absolutely Oscar worthy. I still marvel at how polished his performance was right from the get-go. 😥
<I still marvel at how polished his performance was right from the get-go.>
Yes…What a coincidence…Here’s my personal conspiracy theory:
What is he remembered most for, when he visited the WTC site, that made people think he was such a great leader?
The bull horn line with his arm around the fireman…
It was just too perfect from a man who could never think quickly on his feet.
Someone in the back of the crowd yells, ‘We can’t hear you!’
What if someone was instructed to yell that out so he could deliver his perfect
rehearsed line given to him by Karl Rove?
“I can hear you! I can hear you! The rest of the world hears you!
And the people — and the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon!”
Actually that was a very awkward line compared to PDJT’s brilliant top of mind comments.
Sounds like Rove, though, I agree. Another awkward dweeb.
The difference is that both knew full well they were lying. A lie never rings true.
Now we can see the strings.
“the people who knocked these buildings down…”
Those “people” turned a deaf ear to “all of US” {We The People}.
FBI = Organized crime
CIA = Terrorism
Absolutely zero Constitutional authority for either “entity”…
Follow the $$…
Straight to the money laundering {RICO}, currency manipulating, enemy aiding and abetting {Treason}, criminal enterprise known as…
The Federal Reserve Bank.
In God We Trust
{All others pay cash}
Trust God
Fear not
Almost too smooth and polished, like Joe Biden appearing in a suit and tie at his Delaware home on a Saturday evening, only 1 hour after the PA assassination attempt on candidate Trump, calmly describing how upset he was, and vowing to get to the bottom of it.
…and I remember saying to a group at that time,
that the support level was a high mark – with a lot of room to go down ( over time ).
And the group grimaced – with silence – in my direction.
… and it did lower … ( and it was not because of a prediction )
…bailing out car companies was an indicator of ongoing miss thinking.
…the constrictions on privacy, liberty was also a negative indicator of globalist$ seeking control.
[ whom got duped by someone standing on a pile of 9/11 rubble ( whom helped make it )
and yeah,
I relatively preferred Bush over Gore
(but both were bad choices, propped up by media …not grass roots…)].
Whom all are / were getting duped by
ukr / z actor$,
c- virus / injection$?
How and why?
hmmm….
What is the next ploy?
( someone$ are miss seeking what wooden-nickle notion(s) might work on the naive’ for the next moment to seek control )
People know.
Seeking and sharing the truth…
The Lord knows… first hand … a lot about some human miss behaviors…
…while devoted to sharing the truth.
That action, fortitude, faith, love for others is something good that is worthwhile emulating…
Imho
Like most people above ground, he enjoys breathing and wished to continue.
JB doesn’t know himself from a hole in the ground.😳
Not only for himself.
Wife, kids, parents, etc.
Whistle blowers aren’t going to blow unless and until they have a minimum
level of trust to do so.
Islam caused it.
Muslims did it with the help of a pathetic State Department and FBI who are on Islam’s side just like all of Western Europe.
Anything else is just a distraction.
11% of Americans believe the earth is flat and the same number believe no one landed on the moon.
Hey, It’s a free country so you can believe space aliens and the Amish did it for all the world cares, but we know who did it and you can face the facts or you can obfuscate. Again, it’s a free country so have at it.
This may have been the silliest comment ever posted on this site.
Funny thing about “this site”. Individuals are normally allowed to express their opinions and perspectives.
Many of the comments posted on this thread are ludicrous. Presumabl you will be identifying them.
His event happened 20+ years ago. Totally different time. People blindly thought the FBI had integrity and if they raided someone, they were guilty. Raided backthen meant he didn’t have a snowballs chance to hades to win.
Well. Did the fbi goons lay off his daughter after he capitulated?
If I’m not mistaken they basically did the same thing to Flynn’s son?
Maybe you should listen to the entire interview.
A. Weldon was a local county councilman when he ran for Congress, not a deep pockets billionaire
B. In 2006 the general public was NO WHERE NEAR as awakened to government corruption at the highest levels as they are since Trump ran and won in 2016, and are even more awake when the 2020 election was stolen. Accordingly, back in 2006 a large % of the electorate believed what the government and its MSM lackeys told them to believe, regardless of actual facts and context.
C. There was no widely-known alternative media (the internet was still forming) with any sizable audience (only Rush Limbaugh), so people had few to no easily-accessible sources to disprove the propaganda from MSM newspapers and cable TV
D. Weldon knew he had powerful forces against him but insufficient “gravitas” (nationally) to garner much support if he challenged the Deep State
E. I think the raid on his daughters house genuinely made him step back and become more circumspect about choosing his subsequent actions. Commie crap like that raid did not occur with otherwise decent and ethical congressmen up to then – it was a shock to be treated like that
Funny, I formed the same impression and in my mind used the same word”lame”.
My problem with his comments is that he still seems to have bought the official 9/11 narrative about Muslims and planes when there is so much information out there including scientific, engineering, and architectural reports that have discredited the official narrative.
He is lost in the weeds and doesn’t see the forest.
I listened to the entire interview and it certainly appears you did not. Two of the terrorists were NOCs according to Weldon.
Busted. I was turned off by his seeming disregarding the wealth of information out there that challenges the official narrative that Muslim terrorists are to blame.
What are NOCs?
Non-Official Cover. An intelligence officer who operates under a covert identity untraceable back to the government agency the individual is actually working for.
I listened to the interview. Thats not what he believes but what you want us to believe.
He spoke of the “3000 architects”… also mentioned Thermite— Hello!
And that they knew Atta was involved.
I completely disagree with this assessment.
The only thing your assumption proves is that you have never lived through anything comparable to this reality.
Many of us have on different levels during our time serving the public and those of us who understand the intricacies, also have a deep belief in public service and telling the TRUTH to the American people, as part of our responsibility.
I can understand every emotion that Curt Weldon is expressing. Actually, I would be more dramatic (LOL!), however, I would be espousing the TRUTH.
Curt Weldon is telling the truth and that is a good thing.
He’s not pretending or putting on a dramatic bit part.
I will never criticize honesty, sincerity, loyalty and patriotism.
My impression is Weldon is living with a very heavy burden NOT of his doing but a helplessness created and defended by the CIA.
Remember the night I figured this out and was very disoriented for a day or two. Remember reading that life will go on as it did before, only your thinking has changed.
I believe Weldon was telling the truth. His opportunity to tell Tucker what he knows and to show his deep emotion over the wrongs committed seemed genuine to me.
He’s been waiting for a chance to have someone he trusts (Tucker) to listen to him. It must have been a sorely needed relief valve for what he has been carrying around for years! For men of good will to know such unhappy truths can shatter someone to their very soul.
It’s one thing to put your own life on the line. But when you clearly understand they will murder/destroy your child, that’s a whole ‘nother Something. Make no mistake they made sure Curt Weldon understood he was risking his family’s life back then. Don’t judge.
You hear the same Sentiment from President Trump. When Shifty came out and said Don Jr would be in prison for a a long long time. The way Trump explains it and watching his face, it is sobering.
The focus of many on soap opera trivia rather than the monumental event significance, reveals some things about the mass psycho-emotional states manipulated by Controllers.
Forget about the soap opera, consider objective facts about the event:
ae911truth.org
If the architects and engineers are right, it means veiled Controllers have been executing a global Plan for decades, this was a designed pivot in that Plan which triggered The Patriot Act and other major shifts, and they are still executing.
Does that change your understanding of what is happening?
The Tucker-Weldon interview seems to be a classic Modified Limited Hangout. Joining a running series by the current regime. How’s your cognitive dissonance and distrust of media going? Need more? How about another UAP “exposé”?
‘ The focus of many on soap opera trivia rather than the monumental event significance, reveals some things about the mass psycho-emotional states manipulated by Controllers. ‘
And maybe it also reveals another mass manipulation mechanism:
Seeding reader comment threads and other social media with fake steering inputs.
And even the realization that this may be occurring is a payoff for the Controllers:
More distrust of media and the increasingly crazy information in media.
So that the crazy but true things pass by and we all shrug and go about our daily lives.
And make no mistake—the engineering and physics is incontrovertible.
Yours is the critical conclusion.Three buildings freefell into their own footprint? This would never happen by accident or by fire, and never have in the past except using carefully timed explosions and complex wiring by highly trained professionals. This took weeks or months to set up. Buildings hit by airplanes could fall over, but never pancake into themselves symmetrically unless wired to do so. Secondly, military grade thermite was used and identified microscopically throughout the debris. The characteristic red(iron oxide)-gray(aluminum) chips may have been nano-thermite. This means that DARPA was involved and probably controlling events, not just the CIA. The tremendous heat produced could only come from a military pyrotechnic. Thirdly, the debris itself was very unusual, molten iron flowing outwards from the structures, followed by concrete pulverized into a flour as the buildings fell. This flour was so fine a particulate that it created respiratory toxins. People were breathing this stuff into their lungs, and I’m sure it killed a considerable number. This all tells me that we, the U.S. was at least in part responsible, and the accepted narrative was mostly a ruse.
You could be a NOC.
Tucker believes him.
I do also.
911 was a setup.
Oh, I most definately don’t believe a word of the official version of 9/11.
I also don’t trust this guy either
I think he said his opponent pulled his ad buys months in advance of the raid on his daughter for that week in October.
now
The only difference between now and then is by degree and detail.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/11/02/criticism-has-consequences-fbi-raids-home-of-nyc-mayor-eric-adams-chief-fundraiser/
matter
No Lives Matter, unless they can be exploited for political and/or financial gain.
-White House defends Harris’s Jan. 6 comparison to 9/11 and Pearl Harbor
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/2189464/white-house-defends-harriss-jan-6-comparison-to-9-11-and-pearl-harbor/
I believe that Ross Perot told the truth about why he stopped his campaign.
I remember old man bush. Clinton and the media eviscerate him.
I can’t understand the amount and areas of pressure on this guy, but I imagine it would be massive.
If you put some thought to it, we’ve already seen every play that they put on.
✔️ we’ve already seen every play that they put on
That’s why The MAGA Saga is a thriller that beats the snorefest Days of Our Globullist Lives by a mile.
PDJT would say they bomb at the box office.
9/11 was used to change the world as we knew it by TPTB.
It was used to usher in the Patriot Act, which in hindsight was what started us down the road of losing freedoms in the US, one by one.
At the time, I thought ” What’s the big deal if you aren’t doing anything wrong?”
It was the Camel’s nose under the tent, and the IC community took full advantage.
Exactly what I thought. Then there came millions of FISA searches by thousands of people. Arrests for wrong thought. Prosecutions for No Crime. Fair elections are for fools. The slope turned out to be very slippery for MAGA.
Recently rewatched Enemy of the People.
In that film, art was clearly mirroring early 2000’s reality.
Corrupt fed gummint murdering key opposition to a fictionalized version of the Patriot Act.
Culture is downstream from politics – or upstream?
Does anyone remember what President Trump said about 9/11 at the time?
Al Qaida didn’t do 911, come on people, really………Building 7 says it all.
Watch the buildings fall.
An airplane taking them down is a physical impossibility.
The only way they could have come down was a controlled demolition.
ae911truth.org
This explains it all:
“Laurent Guyénot: 911 And Israel’s Great Game” on Rumble.
911 was most definitely conducted by the same entity that assassinated JFK, RFK, General Patton and likely many other leaders that would have steered our country in a better direction.
Fingers are definitely pointing at the Israeli Lobby for JFK
Larry Silverstein’s trip to Israel months before—how convenient
He was a fire captain, not a PhD in physics or civil engineering. I agree Building 7 is a puzzle.
Points I disagree on:
– Popular Mechanics did an analysis on how a direct hit with 60,000 gallons (full tanks by design) of jet fuel (burns at 2000 – 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit) could take down those buildings
– Dr. Bill Wattenburg on KGO radio, PhD in Physics from Cal Berkeley, worked on the Apollo Mission and did research at Lawrence Livermore Labs, said it was very plausible
– don’t forget the jet fuel sets several floors of furniture, carpets, etc on fire
– I believe those temperatures would melt the internal support beams over one hour, including the compromised structure
No planes on 9/11 hit any buildings..only one fly by plane witnessed by Diane Sawyer flew between the buildings..the hit we saw on TV was computer generated..the truth has been covered up. Read up on Gerard Holmgren.
https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/gerard-holmgren.html
I was watching CNN live when the 2nd plane hit. One of my good friends was on his way to work when the plane that hit the Pentagon flew over him on the interstate about 200 ft off the ground
You were watching TV. Lots of movies appear on TV.
I watched the second plane hit. I also remember Heckle & Jeckle
No plane hit the pentagon. All video camera footage would have shown it and they would have played it live, just like the 2 planes in NYC. How many cameras were there at the pentagon, by the way?
I have family members who were first responders at Pentagon that day.
It happened.
Quite grisly. 🤢
And I do remember them talking about the jet fuel.
There was a parking lot camera that glitched at the crucial moment—a plane did not hit the Pentagon, but there was an explosion.
I have family members and friends
who were first responders to Pentagon
that day.
Firefighters-one who specialized in
Haz-Mat,high DOD clearance- mutual
aid..he worked at NRL.
Family members talked about
the jet fuel.
Bodies and what happens to them when
covered in jet fuel…..
And it happened so fast….basically….people died at
their desks….
Conversation got pretty intense-and I excused myself
for a bathroom visit 🤢🤢 Way above my pay-grade.
I was as well. IT HAPPENED.
Sure he was…and where did the Titanium Engine parts go? Where did the plane go? Man, you are gullible. Where did the $2,300,000,000 go that Rumsfeld said the Pentagon “Lost”
Bet it was a missile not a plane that flew over him.
And CNN lies.
Flight 93 anybody?
Over one hundred interviewed say what they saw was a missile hitting the aircraft.
But, those details just don’t find their way into the ‘official’ report.
Do they?
If no plane, how are the deaths of crew / passengers explained? Where did the airplane(s) go?
Put the bong down, dude!
How do you explain those many people jumping out of the burning towers?
The visual was as unmistakable as the bodies accumulating on the concrete plaza.
Another vantage point of one plane approach was found & released about a year ago.
Building 7 was also hit with DEW, the records it contained needed to be destroyed. This technology, is very dangerous and likely controlled by CIA.
BULLSHIT. ABSOLUTE, TOTAL, COMPLETE, BULLSHIT.
Bldg 7 had fires in some rooms on one and IIRC, only one floor. Those fires did not bring the building down. Controlled implosion did.
Bldg 7’s roof collapsed mid center; a telltale sign of controlled implosion. As the roof collapses mid center; two vertical lines of explosions are seen from top floor to bottom floor, on right and left half of building. These are cutter charges.
Said cutter charges literally cut the building into three vertically divided sections, with the middle section falling straight downward, and the two end sections then following straight downward and ever so slightly towards bulding center.
THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMO … NOT JET FUEL … JET FUEL HAS NEVER AND WILL NEVER BURN HOT ENOUGH TO MELT STEEL
The major weight bearing full load columns are in the center of a building. Those would also be in the hottest area of the fire. Once those columns softened and gave out, the full weight of the stories above pancaked down. The series of ‘charge explosions’ some believed they saw were actually the beams being sheared off of the perimeter half-load columns as the center went down first. The bangs and sparks are caused by tremendous pressures, shearing off steel bolts, and welds tearing apart.
But he put it all in CAPS, so it must be true. (or not)
“THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMO … NOT JET FUEL … JET FUEL HAS NEVER AND WILL NEVER BURN HOT ENOUGH TO MELT STEEL”
You have quite the imagination.
I’m flattered, thank you.
Then why did NIST Seal the report? EVERY steel Building would have a fatal flaw we are ignoring.
These WTC Buildings were the stiffest and strongest towers built.
Those planes should have been like a Mosquito hitting a screen door.
The fire from the impact from a jet hitting the building would never have made it to the center of the building.
The fire would never have made it into the building as the aircraft is 99% air.
And it would have crumpled upon impact with the massive concrete and steel structure.
Think aluminum foil vs poured concrete and structural steel.
You do know debris and parts of the building landed on WT 7. It had to come down
Written and expressed like a true moron. You are a complete and utter fool. I SAW THE SECOND PLANE HIT!
So did I.
Excellent points. Does anyone remember the research of Dr. Judy Wood & Dr. Morgan Reynolds ? The Star Wars Beam Weapon Concept.
And, the center of this and every building have the heaviest steel members. That is they are the strongest part of the structure.
Unless a controlled demolition, the center of this and every building would be the last part to go down.
Same with the WTC.
Popular Mechanics is a CIA controlled publication. (Think 60 Minutes, Rolling Stone Magazine, etc. — once fairly trustworthy outlets). Richard Gage has repeatedly addressed the Popular Mechanics coverup article.
As for your other items, check out this documentary, which was referred to in the Tucker interview:
Here’s the documentary that redpilled me, back in the day:
I think the genuine conspiracy angle relates not to how the buildings came down (I believe it was the effect of the planes), but to how the hijackers were recruited, trained and allowed into and then remain in the country.
To get what the Deep Stated wanted didn’t require those specific buildings, or even more than one of the buildings to push their Patriot Act through and justify their newest “forever” war.
They just needed a successful attack… and they got just what the facilitated.
Your premise might be right but let’s not forget that WTC7 was a bonus to “them” as it had a lot of compromising investigative data in it for Enron case and many more. It’s like the insurance WTC owner Larry Silverstein had and GWB brother running security for the WTC.. Same with the plane / missile / drone hitting the Pentagon at the exact spot where the accounting for the missing trillions was supposed to happen..
Now there’s many more “coincidence’s” like the art project gelitin the “B-thing” having bags of controllers(needed for controlled explosions)at the same area the plane will hit few months later.
It goes on and on..
Wow….no really? Popular Mechanics? Sheeeeeeeeeet…….
Oxygen-starved kerosene fire, black smoke and mostly gone in minutes. Not even 1000 degrees.
Not to meentuon the fire retardant on the beans used to build the towers was subpar.
Nice try, but you are off by 44,000 Gallons.
Thats FILTHY LIBERAL math
How did your 4000 degree fires in WTC 1&2 knock down WTC 7?????? Please enlighten us mere mortals.
Weldon said buildings are designed to survive plane impact.
Weldon said there is an audio from a Fire Chief that took an elevator to the 40th floor and then reported on building status very 5 floors. He reached the impact floor which was the 78th floor and said there are 2 fires and we can handle it. Minutes later the building collapsed. Witnesses heard explosions. I saw a clip of one person saying it recently.
For me it is like TWA800…. hundreds of people saw missiles hit the plane early on and then crickets.
Jet fuel is kerosene.
The maximum burn temperature is 1250 Fahrenheit. In strict laboratory conditions which these were not, it can burn hotter. See Dr. Judy Wood’s analysis.
Dr. Wood is a Ph.D in materials engineering who wrote, “Where did the Towers Go?”, the definitive scientific analysis of the destruction of the WTC. She also challenged the official narrative in a Qui Tam lawsuit she took to the US Supreme Court.
Dr. Wood proves it was done by a directed energy weapon not by aluminum planes and a “collapse”. She doesn’t analyze who did it, just how it was done. Who did it is obvious because only nation states and only one or two of those could have used a directed energy weapon.
Popular Mechanics seems to have been in on the media narrative coverup.
Several fundamental problems with Dr. Wattenburg’s “analysis”.
DEW bro. This was the first public use of DEW. Judy Woods book “Where Did the Towers Go? Laid out what did, and didn’t happen to the buildings. From incorrect seismic signatures, to hidden damage to steel beams inside nearby buildings, and literal ‘dustification’ of the buildings themselves, the odd window damage, the half burnt cars etc. The next use of it (CIA?) at Lahaina was so freaking petty by comparison. She has a video lecture on Youtube if it hasn’t been pulled.
Jet fuel can’t melt autism vaccines
Smitty I mean this with respect and only to help. You need some knowledge of structure to understand what you saw. The ext.vertical steel fascade WERE the exterior structural columns. They were NOT just curtain wall cladding. As temps within the breach reached 1600-1800 degrees these columns lost tensile strength. There were many floor levels of mass above the breach bearing down on these columns. This mass slightly tilted and move straight down, hitting the next floor pan, overloading it and collapsed to the next level. This was happening exponentially faster and faster as mass and velocity increased with each floor collapse. Looked like a controlled demo because it collapsed exactly like one.
PennyDoler, your assumptions are too great.
1. “As temps within the breach reached 1600-1800 degrees”. How does this happen when jet fuel burns below 800F and it flash burns.
2. How does an aircraft that is 99% air and made from aluminum shear through a poured reinforced concrete floor and structural steel columns and beams, dispersing fuel that is located in the weakest, most vulnerable part of the aircraft, the wings? The wing sections upon impact would NEVER have made it into the building. They would have immediately sheared off. Your analysis would have to prove that the aluminum structure of the aircraft including the aluminum rivets holding its frame together are stronger than cold rolled A36 structural steel.
What say you?
1 – ummm … other stuff besides just jet fuel burned too … the contents of the office space … furniture, desks, office dividers, file cabinets full of paper paper paper … etc
2 – ummm … speed, momentum … re “reinforced concrete floor”, video I’ve seen looked like the impact was largely between floors … even if part of the plane did hit a floor slab end on, it likely would deflect above or below and enter the space between floors … what? you’d expect it to bounce off?
re: “immediately sheared off” … yeah, and continued into the building with couple hundred miles an hour momentum … what? you’d expect them to halt and fall to the street just because they’d been “sheared off”?
geez …
“stuff besides just jet fuel burned too … the contents of the office space … furniture, desks, office dividers, file cabinets full of paper paper paper … etc”
If this “stuff” does burn, it burns at a much lower temperature than jet fuel. The steel grate in my fireplace hasn’t melted in 30 years.
“speed, momentum” – why didn’t the airplanes just knock down each WTC tower and drop them on their sides?
An airplane is like an aluminum can of soda or beer. It’s pressurized to keep it shape.
Hit the aluminum can with a wooden baseball bat and the can will immediately loose its structural integrity and collapse into scrap. The beer or soda will splat all over.
Same would happen when an aircraft would hit the WTC.
There were no planes that hit the WTC. The 4 massive engines would have played pinball on the surrounding buildings.
If this “stuff” does burn, it burns at a much lower temperature than jet fuel. The steel grate in my fireplace hasn’t melted in 30 years.
I don’t think your fireplace grate has a venturi / bellows effect on it that wind being sucked into open upper floors on the buildings and exhausting on the other side would have as the fire drove the draft.
You’re familiar with how bellows work? Our ancestors understood it when they were smelting and working with metals in the copper and bronze ages thousands of years ago
Hit the aluminum can with a wooden baseball bat and the can will immediately loose its structural integrity and collapse into scrap. The beer or soda will splat all over.
Fine, let’s stay on the baseball diamond
Take your place at home plate as a batter and have the pitcher pitch that can of soda at your head at fastball speed.
Don’t duck. Let it hit you in the head.
Now tell us all about the can “losing its structural integrity” yada yada
How’s your head feel? Any damage?
And did the can “play pinball” as it bounced down and off your shoulder, knee, ankle? Like your “surrounding buildings”?
Analogies are fun
Wingnuttery is fun too, though there are shortcomings to it
Your analysis would have to prove that the aluminum structure of the aircraft including the aluminum rivets holding its frame together are stronger than cold rolled A36 structural steel …
No
That’s a false premise
The planes didn’t knock the buildings down
They didn’t “break” steel beams and cause building collapse
The buildings collapsed LATER
… after fire weakened the steel to the point its load-bearing strength decreased, enough that the steel beams buckled because they were no longer capable of supporting the load of all the floors above them
none of this sequence requires that the aluminum airplane elements be “stronger than steel”
“speed, momentum” – why didn’t the airplanes just knock down each WTC tower and drop them on their sides?
Because the airplanes didn’t have enough mass and momentum and force to topple buildings, to snap them off and tip them over. You’re setting up a strawman argument about the nature of the collapse.
Again, the planes didn’t “knock the buildings over”, the buildings collapsed much later, long after impact, when the fire weakened the load-bearing strength of the steel beams to a point they could no longer support the load of all the floors above the fire-affected floors.
Once one floor collapsed, the rest would fail in pancake succession because the building was designed for STATIC load (the load of the building just standing there) plus a safety factor.
NOT
the DYNAMIC load of an upper floor collapsing and falling on the floor below
once one floor fails in that fashion, all the rest fall in an unstoppable chain reaction, because the dynamic load on each far exceeds the design static load it was engineered to
you get exactly what we saw
it can “look like” a controlled demolition because that’s simply the way multi-floor skyscrapers fail … they collapse vertically as each successive floor is overloaded in excess of its bearing capacity
If it collapsed as you claim, where was all the debris that two buildings of this size would produce?
With respect, you’ve bought into the pancake “collapse” theory and narrative. My husband, an architect with knowledge of structure, built an exact model of the trade centers, complete with the alleged “planes”. He saw through the pancake narrative from the afternoon of September 11th when they tried to push it.
And of course, what about Building 7 ? It was not hit by a “plane”.
Smitty’s comment is based on hard science, physics and I appreciate that he took the time to detail the facts.
where was all the debris that two buildings of this size would produce?
ummmm – some of us watched workers toil for weeks and weeks and weeks removing that “debris”
they worked on what they referred to as “the pile”
where’s the mystery?
So, over 100 stories of reinforced concrete flooring just pulverized into powder.
No rubble.
I guess there’s a first time for everything?
who said “pulverized” and who said “powder”?
not me
where are you getting this information about “powder”?
again, we watched for weeks and months as workers removed all the material of “the pile”
the pile largely WAS concrete and steel beams, plus other materials like furniture and paper, the contents of offices
the task included torch-cutting of many, many, many steel beams and carting away the pieces on trucks … there are articles on the internets about where the material was taken
and tons and tons of broken concrete … there were slabs of it, with bodies in some spaces between the slabs
the sniffer rescue dogs would get depressed because they’re trained to find survivors but none of their finds were still alive and they’d get sad about that
… the trainers had to “fake a live one” now and then, just to keep the dogs’ spirits up
dunno where you got your fictional idea about “powder”
is there some website that discusses the buildings collapsing but claims there was no debris at ground level or something?
So, how could a controlled demolition been set up without being noticed? How many people would have had to be involved, all of them remaining silent?
One of the Bush brothers had dealings with security at the World Trade Center when all of this took place.
https://www.commondreams.org/views/2003/02/04/bush-linked-company-handled-security-wtc-dulles-and-united
One of the online documentaries I watched said that Marvin Bush, the youngest of the Bush boys, had all security pulled from the buildings for a week, and did that a few weeks before the buildings went down. I’m sorry I don’t remember what documentary it was or have a link to it.
But if true, what was being done in the buildings during that week? Setting up controlled demolition?
We have oftened talked about your last question concerning a lot of evil stuff that has happened.
All of them remaining silent.
JFK’s murder. There had to be a lot of people who knew exactly what happened.
TWA800, a lot of people knew exactly what happened.
9/11
Las Vegas shooting
Plannedemic
Assassination attempt of President Trump
And many, many, many more, some that haven’t even been “reported” due to the corruption all around us.
USS Liberty.
It was decades before the crew spoke up
publicly.
The Government managed to keep what
really happened silent.
294 crew members
34 died
170+ wounded
And it was decades……before people knew.
Great Documentary.
It tells the lengths our Government went to
in order to hide the truth.
“USS Liberty: Dead In The Water” (BBC Documentary 2002) – YouTube
The thinking is that DEW was used. DEW is a Directed Energy Weapon.
The DEW theory fits all the facts better as described by Dr. Judy Wood. The original alternative theories of controlled demolition and thermite really don’t fit all the facts. For example, a controlled demolition would leave the normal amount of debris expected from the enormous size of the two structures.
Personally, it seems possible to me that it was a DEW but that there may have been bombs placed at various levels in the structures (just in case the DEW didn’t work? a backup? a cover for the DEW?) I say this because there were many witnesses that say they heard serial explosions and if I am not mistaken there may even be acoustical noise consistent with periodic explosions on some of the videos captured in the films that are online.
For example, a controlled demolition would leave the normal amount of debris expected from the enormous size of the two structures
Is there some webpage that demonstrates that a “normal amount of debris” was NOT left at the bottom?
There was “the pile” of debris – concrete and steel beams -that took months to be cut up and carted offsite for disposal … round-the clock workers and cranes and other heavy equipment and trucks to cart it all to disposal sites
There was so much of it that they called it “the pile” … it was “several stories” high, from what I can find on the internets
Was it somehow “undersized” compared to some standard of “normal”?
Nope. I refuse to believe that Rick Rescorla could have been either fooled enough or convinced enough to have anything to do with any 9-11 “inside job”. That is ABSOLUTELY NOT POSSIBLE. He was one of the smartest and bravest men ever to draw breath on this planet.
So, consider that I’m calling you a liar right to your face, because you are.
Thermite
It’s found at every building demolition. Including the WTC sites.
The 200+ Israeli spies up and down the Eastern Seaboard in the months preceding 911 and their arrest after, including the 5 dancing Israeli’s speaks volumes. Why was “our greatest ally” spying on us so pervasively before, during and after 911?
Don’t they have hundreds here all the time?
Every member of Congress has a fulltime AIPAC minder.
I was wondering when someone was going to bring up the dancing Israelis! That settles it … once-and-for-all.
I thought it was dancing muslims
across the river in Hoboken or somewhere like that
Nope. The media lied by obfuscating and calling them “dancing middle easterners”, which is technically true but causes the audience to ASSUME they were Arabic/Muslim type, not the Sadistic, Talmudic ethno-supremacist type. The FBI records of the 5 dancing Israeli’s is DAMNING. Their job was to video and photograph the planes hitting the towers so there would be a plethora of propaganda footage to push into the American psyche to get us riled up to go to war for Israel’s benefit.
Bet you also didn’t know that Jack Ruby’s real name was Jack RininSTEIN and that JFK was serious about nuclear nonproliferation and was HEAVILY pressuring Israeli PM David Ben Gurion to allow US inspectors into their Dimona Reactor where they were creating their nuclear arsenal.
thanks for the thorough explanation, Winston
got a link for any of that?
Laurent Guyenot’s “The Unspoken Kennedy Truth” available on Amazon and summarized in free Rumble documentary here:
https://rumble.com/v53t5z6-israel-and-the-assassinations-of-the-kennedy-brothers-a-documentary-by-laur.html
5 Dancing’s Israeli’s is covered in numerous places. The FBI records were released due to FOIA and can be seen on Archive.org. But are summarized here:
https://peakd.com/@treepi/the-dancing-israelis-fbi-docs-shed-light-on-apparent-mossad-foreknowledge-of-9-11-attacks-as-another-9-11-anniversary-comes-and-goes-many-questions-surrounding-the-events-remain-unanswered
And here:
https://rumble.com/v6q8jdu-laurent-guynot-911-and-israels-great-game.html?e9s=src_v1_upp
thanks again, Winston, will have a look
Yes, it does indeed. As well as the vid of the ‘puffs’ from explosives emanating from the towers. Same explosives take downs as is seen in vids of the old Las Vegas hotels demolitions.
Speaking of Las Vegas…
Wonder how the American people would feel/react if they found out the root cause was the DS?
Al Qaida certainly did do 911. Al Qaida is a proxy of the CIA. Just as ISIS is a CIA proxy. Everything leads back to the CIA.
They did not do it ALONE.
Al Qaeda doesn’t control Syria, Ahmad al-Sharaa does, regardless what WTC7 or WTC6 says.
The CIA rushed to install them before PDT came in.
Thank you!
Exactly
May the Lord protect this man, and Tucker.
The swamp runs very deep. Wave upon wave of lies, corruption, and evil. It is going to take God, and some persons of integrity, to uncover it and root it out.
OMG – why anyone would encourage their child to enlist after listening to this is beyond me.
The corruption is so deep.
These scumbags – AKA Karl Rove – a little fat man. May they all ROT in h3LL
Mentioned here several times, personally heard John O’Neill the then head of the fbi counter terrorism section say
Osama bin Laden was involved in a grand plan to crash planes into the WTC towers . He said they’d fly 747s into the towers. This was a year before 9/11. He was driven from the fbi over total BS by the corrupt incompetent scum fbi administration. He was killed on 9/11 in the towers. Watch PBS Frontline “The Man Who Knew”
PBS????
I’m sorry but this is one of the grossest human beings on the planet. I was once a newbie staffer on the Hill and went to the front office to get our mail. There was a vote going on so I couldn’t get on the Member’s subway (yes, that is a thing.) I had a big box and some mail and was walking and this creature walked behind me and said “with legs like that, you shouldn’t be walking.” He was thrown out of Congress because he was a known letch and had a designated staffer to clean his crap up. Believe what you want but he has zero standing with anyone relevant.
Thank you for posting this info…I had a few bosses like that and they garnered zero respect but they “knew” people and they were part of the “network” so nothing ever happened to them. I will watch this interview with your comments in mind…I do not believe for one moment that we got the whole story on 9/11 BUT that doesn’t mean that I have to believe everything that is said about the events of that day either!
And, I continue to have serious concerns about Tucker, despite all the adulation that he receives from the right these days…he can’t seem to decide if it wants to play the village jester or the fearless journalist and seems to bounce between the two, which makes him highly suspicious IMHO!
Hmm, havne’t seen you post before but pop up now with a story about the guy the article is about….
And, Bill Clinton once told me my ass was nice….and I’m a dude. C’mon. And yet, 12 people gave you thumbs up.
I’m not one of the twelve.
Some of these comments are way, way out there…Whoa!
WTH!
MDT baby, you had me till you said “I had a big box” LOFL
Me thinks thou doth protest too much. He complimented your legs and that turned him into a Creature? Oh my stars and garters. And he was thrown out of Congress because Congress does not suffer Letches?! ROFL. PULEEZE.
Vigilant Guardian, Vigilant Warrior, Northern Guardian, Northern Vigilance. The Joint Chiefs (Myers) and NORAD were conducting a joint, live-fly, hijack Field Training Exercise (FTX) which involved at least one (and almost certainly many more) aircraft under US control that was posing as a hijacked airliner.
Yes indeed.
On September 11th, the U.S. military was conducting a massive air exercise, far more massive than usual, involving pretend hijacked airlines . . . an exercise that provided cover for the real attacks that it ALSO conducted, followed up with the controlled demolition of the three skyscrapers in New York City and with the attack on its own pentagon, where the accountant office was, but on the opposite side of the top brass.
It would have been much easier and far more deadly for the amateur pilot to crash into the Pentagon from above, but no . . . the “pilot” circled around and came in very very low to the ground at top speed and busted through the side wall that had recently been reinforced in case of a terror attack, burning the accountant offices that showed vast irregularities in the accounting books.
The plane that crashed in Pennsylvania was headed for building seven.
The controlled news media immediately knew that it was headed instead for the Capital building, somehow reading the hijackers’ minds.
If building seven hadn’t been pulled, the wiring for its demolition would have been discovered. So, they detonated it, and said it collapsed at free fall due to office fires.
Chain of command/chain of custody. Find out who signed off on those 4 war games and under what authorization and there you will find you answer to 9/11. The probability of coincidence of these four drills using Cold War training exercises on a random Tuesday in early September in 2001 defies the odds. Like winning the Pick 4 lottery 3 days in a row. Just doesn’t happen. WTC7 and Saudis are just nice shiny objects to divert your attention. You know this game.
Pascal20 you have this 100% correct.
WTC7 is the smoking gun as it was absolutely a controlled demolition. And the fact that controlled demolitions of that scope and scale take months of pre-planning and preparation confirms that 911 was conducted by much more than the patsy hijackers.
Look into the “Israeli art students” who in the months before had occupied the exact floors where the impacts occurred. In addition to the hundreds of Israeli spies rounded up in the days before and after 911.
Atta was a mujaheddin pilot that hijacked a plane.
The freedom-fighters hate us for our freedom.
Do you have a source for that?
The 2nd bldg that was hit had the hole where the plane went in lower so there was more weight above it than the 1st blg.I watched the video of that collapse and the corner folded at the edge of the impact hole.It was a closeup video.Nobody ever talks about the Boeing 767 size hole in the side of the building and the building supports that were destroyed by the impact or the 30 tons of burning aluminum.There is a video that shows molten metal pouring out of the building. Summary below of episode S1.E2 ∙ 9/11 Secret Explosions in the Towers–Video was scrubbed from sites that had it for free,but is available for a fee.Curt Weldon is overly excitable for my taste.I know government agencies lie all the time about everything.
After four years of research, the release of official conclusions left many unsatisfied. Both buildings were designed to survive the impact of a commercial airliner and the fireproofed steel structures should have survived the fires that followed – yet within two hours both towers had collapsed. In addition, video footage of molten metal pouring from the damaged floors and eyewitness reports of explosions before the collapse were not addressed fully, fuelling conspiracies of a government plot to destroy the towers and drag America into a war on terror. Retired chemist Dr Frank Greening agrees that the report is unconvincing. He immediately spots a glaring omission in the official report – the missing evidence – the role of the airplanes themselves in the collapse. According to the official report, the aircraft disintegrated on impact and played no part in the events that followed. As a chemist, Frank Greening cannot believe that the presence of 30 tons of aluminum can be simply dismissed. In Norway, Dr. Greening’s work finds support from metallurgist Christian Simensen, who is also unconvinced by the official findings. After 30 years in the metal industry, Christian knows only too well that 30 tons of aluminum alloys in the heart of the fires and under the right conditions could be highly explosive. Together, Christian Simensen and Frank Greening calculate that the aluminum at the heart of the office fires can explain the molten metal seen pouring from the towers and the reported explosions that they believe triggered the catastrophic collapse.
in career 1.0, I was an Architect with a structural bent (iykyk, lol). Given the damage, I was surprised the towers stood as long as they did. Structures have margins of safety for loading, but surviving multiple column failures, plus fire damage? Uh, no.
On top of that, the WTC had an unusual design with less internal beams. I believe the external skeleton was a partial support structure, which was severely compromised. (I think the architects wanted larger unobtructive views.)
I appreciate his viewpoint and his revelations, but he was a fire captain, not a PhD in physics or civil engineering. I agree Building 7 is a puzzle.
– Popular Mechanics did an analysis on how a direct hit with 60,000 gallons (full tanks by design) of jet fuel (burns at 2000 – 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit) could take down those buildings
– Dr. Bill Wattenburg on KGO radio (RIP), PhD in Physics from Cal Berkeley, worked on the Apollo Mission and did research at Lawrence Livermore Labs, said it was very plausible
– don’t forget the jet fuel sets several floors of furniture, carpets, etc on fire, on top of the compromised structure
– I believe those temperatures would melt the internal support beams over one hour, including the compromised structure
you were doing fine until your last point:
– I believe those temperatures would melt the internal support beams over one hour,
I believe the prevailing engineering-informed interpretation is that the heat of the burning jet fuel decreased the STRENGTH (the load-bearing capacity) of the steel support beams
… NOT melted them
which reconciles the frenetic online clamoring that fire temperatures didn’t reach steel’s melting point
hence, my favorite satirical title of a facebook page satirizing yammering conspiracists:
“Jet fuel can’t melt autism vaccines”
How embarrassing. This is a total hack video. Apples and oranges.
There are too many faults in this “demonstration” that it’s not worth addressing.
The reinforced concrete floors are in and of themselves a fire retardant. How did the fire spread between floors?
The interior columns, all of them carry twice the load of the exterior columns.
Simple area loading per square foot.
Same with the beams. The beams on the exterior of the building carry half the load that the interior beams carry.
This is why the beams and columns on the inside of every building are 2X the size (strength) of the exterior beams and columns.
– Popular Mechanics did an analysis on how a direct hit with 60,000 gallons (full tanks by design) of jet fuel (burns at 2000 – 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit) could take down those buildings..
**Pop Mechanics is a rag, just like Snoops. Also, that plane has a TOGW of 390,000. take off gross weight. Fuel around 25,000. a flyable load like that would be left tank, say 6K, center 12K, right tank 6k. the ballast bladder is usually empty and used for CG adjustments, unless it has a MX deferral on it, turning it into a Ballast tank for CG going towards the ZFW, zero fuel weight, and final TOGW. (ballast could depend on the MX and costs demands of AOC, (air operations center) for that regional area.
again all depends of airline MX/pilot demands for CG of aircraft. CG=center of gravity. Another item, the temps you post are for jet engine combustion, not massive fuel dump and flash fire. I say stick with 1550 to 1850 degrees. Also a flash dump on crash is rapid and consumes almost all of extra within 8 to 12 seconds. see videos. flashing ball of flame. the rest of fire would be other fuel sources and after the JP fuel burned off, just the fire itself. So NO ONE HOUR OF 2K to 4K fuel burn, more like max 10 secs.
a/c experience. 727-100, 727-200, MD10, MD11, DC10-10, DC10-30, 747-200, 747-400, 747-8, 747-e4,
747-e4c, 747sp, airbus 300, 310, 320. fokker 27, 50, 60, c-17, c-130 and others. Anyway you get the idea.
My 9/11 story and personal opinion. i worked 2nd shift at world HQ global ops for aircraft, we were called in early and then given instructions to hold all airline operations that day. NO OUTBOUND, and to call employees and give them day off. I didn’t reach all, so pilots, engineers, trunk and non-trunk employees, and load master ramp agents came in. a mix n match of highly trained and smart people.
After all the WOW, we started looking at stuff, like every airplane in USA, all flts and flt info. We found some real funny, quirky stuff. we have a system that list all planes in air, on planes on ground. then tail numbers and its flt trunk history. we found N591UA/flt 93 and N644AA/flt77 on the ground under MX at 4;32 PM CST.
Employee was all excited and a conspiracy military guy, he showed us and all the pilots there, we had a good discussion for about 10 minutes. Then a x-military that used to fly SAC, said ” i’m not interested, please don’t talk to me about it and if I was you I’d drop it, fast.”.. I always found that interesting, he didn’t know anything, but must have smelled something.
Next day systems was UNAVAILABLE for all 4 planes and sr. supervisor strongly suggested we not engage in conspiracy conversations, especially around the pilots. From then on, IMO an inside job or an operation that went off wire.
IMO the 3/4 are the queer planes. no way a 757 can fly with a 2 week trainer on 1 prop plane. I’ve done touch n gos and check rides for all kinds of planes with wide body pilots, NO WAY possible. You can’t fly full speed flying 8 feet off the ground in a 757, and then hit the pentagon the way it did. based on opinion looked like a fighter drone or lg cruise missile. (wsmr. white sands)
Also, plane 4 crash, No Way. no engines, no landing gear. no black box. no wings, where did it go. Anyway enough 9/11 weird to spell inside OP for me and no way the story is correct. It was done to usher in rest of beast system. Additional info, I’m not new, just no posting in a while, getting over aphasia. so any errors, spells or run ons are honest mistake.
Welcome back to the Treehouse Jack! 😀
I visited NYC in mid 70s just a few years after the WTC was built,I walked around the base of the towers ,it was a long walk,I looked up and could not see the top,I went to Windows of the World,also went to the floor where you took the elevator to the roof viewing deck.I was quite breathtaking to be standing outside so high up.While waiting for that elevator I kept feeling significant shudders and movement under my feet.The attendant said the building always moves like that,it was the wind making it flex.Now imagine a 767 size hole in it,the damaged ,destroyed supports,the burning aluminum and fuel,that flexing still going on and you might have a recipe for a collapse.Attached link to a high rise built by China in Bangkok that collapsed during the recent earthquake,a 30 year old abandoned high rise close to it did not collapse.
How then did building 7 implode upon its own footprint. As a man in the trades processed aluminum sheet metal 18 gauge having the effect these buildings sustained simply shows the public’s ignorance of building structure. 18 gauge skin on the airframe is similar to the thickness of a 1957 Chevy door skin. The I beam structure of the twins was 2 inches in the web and 2.5 on the hat. Again what about the third building. Nano Thermite has been proved to be used. Only the US had the capability to make it at that time. I could go on a 200 point list of evidence that shows the US gubbermint was involved not to mention Chennney becoming filthy rich blowing things up then rebuilding. This is why Trump is so hated by them he could change their entire destiny.
there is no yelling in the attached unlike the Tucker episode,just pointing out what the official report ignored, The molten metal can be seen at the 19:59 minute mark
Molten metal would not be the result of jet fuel burning. It’s like turning your stovetop up to 3 to boil water, when it has to be turned up to 10. Simple chemistry: PV=nRT The volume is basically infinite and therefore the temperature is controlled by our atmospheric pressure, which is also a constant.
Thermite, a nuclear substance used in building demolitions and DEWs could cause the molten metal.
No planes hit any buildings on 9/11..a fairy tale.
Read Gerard Holmgren.
https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/gerard-holmgren.html
When we arrived in IL, the ex who wasn’t an ex then… to work for a power company nuke plant still under construction…had said a few times….”the containment buildings were built to sustain a 747 crashing into them”…that was in 1985. Eerie thought.
Yup, that is a requirement.
With all the luck POTUS has had getting the Epstein and JFK docs out, imagine trying to open this can of worms. Why is it so hard to just get the evidence against these bad actors into court and charge them criminally? No sweetheart deals. Hard time. That is the only thing that is going to deter this level of corruption.
Phone Call With Danny Jowenko, expert who said WTC7 was controlled demolition – Died 3 days latter After PressTv interview
Bing Videos
Well, the BBC announced WTC7 destruction on live TV 20 minutes before it happened.
With, the building still standing in the background. Its a comical video.
Oh, and we found out recently that the CIA, through USAID funds the BBC.
When one realizes that the Central Banker elites had top notch spy/espionage agencies long before nation states ever did and that the modern intel agencies spawned from that very old network it becomes clear that the CIA, MI6 and MOSSAD are essentially the same organization, controlled by the same oligarch crime families.
Just watched it
Wow,just Wow
I understand he’s excited, but maybe one less latte before your podcast interview. He yells like Grandpa Simpson at times.
He mentioned Eric Clinesmith was on the same side as himself. The same dude that lied and altered email evidence?? Yikes!
Kevin Clinesmith was the one who altered the document.
Maybe Kevin had a baby with Eric Ciaramella…
The glowing box that controls my mind says that sort of thing is totes possible now.
Yeah, I see now they are actually spelled differently, so they’re not even related.
I listened to this all day, twice.
Weldon is very emotional about this. he KNOWS
President Trump, please take decisive actionS
God Bless America
I appreciate his viewpoint and his revelations, but he was a fire captain, not a PhD in physics or civil engineering. I agree Building 7 is a puzzle, Sandy Berger should have spent years in prison, and we need a real review.
Points I disagree on:
– Popular Mechanics did an analysis on how a direct hit with 60,000 gallons (full tanks by design) of jet fuel (burns at 2000 – 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit) could take down those buildings
– Dr. Bill Wattenburg on KGO radio, PhD in Physics from Cal Berkeley, worked on the Apollo Mission and did research at Lawrence Livermore Labs, said it was very plausible. (“Dr. Bill” was a legend out West. He fought fires in the summer on a bulldozer in his 60s, partied with Clint Eastwood, and more. He helped put out the Kuwait oil fires (strategy), and came up with an invention within weeks to clear land miles in the Middle East via a helicopter-towed “Chain Matrix”.)
– don’t forget the jet fuel sets several floors of furniture, carpets, papers, etc on fire
– I believe those temperatures would melt the internal support beams over one hour, including the compromised structure
The CIA wanted all of this to start never ending wars? Have to be simpler ways than this.
P.S. The yelling doesn’t help his argument.
The Documentary “Calling out Bravo 7” clears up those questions:
CALLING OUT Bravo 7 : The 2020 Edition
Simpler? Yes. Kill enough people to give an entire country PTSD and convince them to turn their country into a police state? You gotta go big Pearl Harbor for that.
💥
The Bushes’ Project for the New American Century created the phrase, “a new Pearl Harbor.”
Project for the New American Century – Wikipedia
This is how you get a republic to go to war.
You must get the people’s support.
So . . .
Our entry into World War One was due to the sinking of the Lusitania, a passenger ship.
Now we know that it WAS LOADED with American weapons (it’s been found at the bottom of the ocean). Those passengers were sacrificed to inspire war fever and enlistments.
The “remember the Maine” was a slogan to inspire support for the Spanish American war. The sinking of the Maine was done by the U.S. military, and blamed on the enemy.
The Gulf of Tonkin . . . that led to Vietnam . . . now exposed as a fake.
Pearl Harbor . . . Roosevelt had advance warning of the attack. That’s why most of our ships weren’t there. It wasn’t luck. The remaining sailors were sacrificed by our government.
Read the Operation Northwoods documents.
The Joint Chiefs of staff presented President Kennedy with a plan for the military to blow up U.S. commercial aircraft and to have undercover U.S. military perform machine gun attacks on civilians in American cities . . . to inspire support for a war against Cuba.
Kennedy said no way, and was assassinated soon after.
This is how America does it.
September 11th was the same.
🎯
The CIA wanted all of this to start never ending wars?
No.
The real goal was the Patriot Act and the creation of a security state. The wars were methods to loot the US treasury and taxpayers.
You’re basically there. The goal with the Patriot Act was/is to create a workaround the Constitution (Bill of Rights to be more precise). Once it passed, they were able to classify anyone they wanted as a suspected domestic terrorist and like a magic wand thereby removed all Constitutional protections for the individual.
9/11 was bigger than warmongering
The Reddit hackers who busted Hunter’s hard drive upload to the cloud that provided lots of damning comms w/Biden confirmed by investigators also claim they ALSO found Dyncorp (notorious Pentagon contractor) encryption codes there, too
https://www.c-span.org/clip/house-committee/user-clip-representative-cynthia-mckinney-questions-secretary-of-defense-donald-rumsfeld/5032198
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/sex-in-peace-operations/above-the-law-sex-trafficking-by-private-military-contractors-in-bosnia/76EEC690559B8B23A6246C872255B57E
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/secret-service-says-aware-alleged-hunter-biden-icloud-hack-rcna37709
Why now? Is this a distraction from some other story? Asking for a friend.
he’s been talking about this for a very long time. list “most news” we get it late in the hour, but it IS very relevant.
notice how he connect to Sandy berger. pay attention to that if for nothing else.
God Bless America
Sandy Berger?
Isn’t that the same Clinton affiliate caught smuggling classified documents out of the National Archives in his trousers?
He talks about this in the above video…guess you didn’t watch it.
How evil are the Clintons.
I just think Tucker is reminding everyone that these problem go so deep that reform might be impossible. And it’s unlikely Kash or Blondi will do anything of significance.
its up to us.
as it should be
is there any other way ?
special notes: why does “it” require that I punch down two key board keys that aren’t untuiitive AT ALL, to FORM A QUESTION?
this isn’t meant to invoke conspiracy …but to call on a antiquated inefficient and meaningless tech spot tie that has lost it’s purpose a very long time ago…well before the “digital age” I would say.
for instance…would it not be better to express yourself….your full flesh being, emotion and “other” *the third person that no one knows, not even you*, so that you can connect to that part of the human experience that is more than just sight sound and matter?
we live in a spiritual world.. why not exist in it …instead of this bothersome substitute?
you might want to crank this up…
the subject isn’t the meaning.
here is no political solution
To our troubled evolution
Have no faith in constitution
There is no bloody revolution
We are spirits in the material world
Are spirits in the material world
Are spirits in the material world
Are spirits in the material world
Our so-called leaders speak
With words they try to jail you
They subjugate the meek
But it’s the rhetoric of failure
We are spirits in the material world
Are spirits in the material world
Are spirits in the material world
Are spirits in the material world
Where does the answer lie?
Living from day to day
If it’s something we can’t buy
There must be another way
We are spirits in the material world
Are spirits in the material world
Are spirits in the material world
Are spirits in the material world
Are spirits in the material world
Are spirits in the material world
this was written in truth “via art”.
pay attention
God Bless America
.
why does “it” require that I punch down two key board keys that aren’t untuiitive AT ALL, to FORM A QUESTION?
Christopher Latham Sholes. 1870-ish. Querty. I’m missing your point.
.
Tucker comes from a family who was CIA.
And as we know from the President Putin interview, Tucker himself was “rejected” by the CIA when he applied.
Why would Putin bring that up?
And was it coincidence that the “CIA reject” got to be the star on Fox News, one of the propaganda networks that manage the people’s information and perspectives?
Same kind of coincidence that Bernstein was a Naval Intelligence Officer in the Whitehouse and becomes a journalist with Zero Experience…….but breaks the Watergate story.
It may depend on what your friend is looking for or not looking for.
“Any deception that does not fit into one of the six categories, is not a true deception but rather some sort of conceit.. To find out which category any deception fits in, the first question should be whether the ruse is intended to hide or to show.” – Cheating and Deception (1991)
-Hiding the real: Masking, Repackaging, Dazzling
-Showing the false: Mimicking, Inventing, Decoying
I’m not sure if some stories are more equal than others. ymmv
https://x.com/MAGAResource/status/1912216545604067776
Dr. Judy Woods, PhD. has a video about the truth about what happened on 911. You should watch it. They. turned to dust from the thermite. she explains it very well. The trees didn’t burn, paper didn’t burn. The impact was felt ss far as Alaska.
YHIS GUY IS A HERO. I hope President Trump watches this Tucker Carlson video.
As bad a the coverup of 9/11 was, the democide with the Covid-19 fake scamdemic is exponentially worse.
Still trust our CIA, FBI, the NSA and so on and now our medical industry? Good luck with that.
Never trusted any of them to begin with..
I worked with Curt Weldon and his staff post-9-11 and can vouch for this reaction. He and his staff were targeted by the deep state because he was not willing to tow the party line. His staffers were charged and convicted of fraud. I knew them personally. It always seemed trumped up to me. I met Curt in Russia when I was working there in the post-Soviet days. We were both concerned with securing loose nukes from the dissolved Soviet empire. His willingness to question motives and the official line about sensitive subjects always impressed me. Curt is a solid patriot and did not deserve this.
Toe the line.
Not tow.
Love isn’t always on thyme.
Auto insert is a real pain..
.
I”m listening to this, about halfway through, and I’m not following a damn thing or feeling like I’m getting any new facts. He’s raving all over the place, generalized conclusory allegations about stuff we already kind of know but nothing that would constitute a clear narrative or “evidence”.
He supposedly has “all this information” but is calling for a Trump commission. Who is “they” and why doesn’t he give some concree examples. Really annoying.
Re 9-11, has his own “perceptions” but can’t really say, that two of the hijackers were working for the CIA, but gives no names. Why. Working for the CIA how. “They” “they” “they” “they”…
The 9-11 commission wouldn’t let him testify because “they knew what I would say” Well, say it NOW, spit it the f… out. That “we could have stopped this…” How. Vague, vague, vague. No details. There already have been multiple books and documentaries saying all these same things, some 20+ years old about “controlled demolition”, experts’ opinions, etc.
.
Exactly, pretty much what I said above regards Weldon.
He reminds me of controlled opposition .
I have never swallowed the official 911 narrative.
Building 7, and very convincing eye witness data uncovered by several researches years ago that involved a number of credible witnesses saying the plane passed to the North of the Citgo gas station on the way to supposedly hitting the Pentagon, which doesn’t support the visible damage.
The whole Pentagon attack, in particular, stinks to high heaven.
Shocking coming from you outhouse counsel.
I read the interview completely differently.
Curt Weldon was authentic, detailed, full of expression, passionate, earnest, compelling, truthful with pointed details and willing to take necessary steps to bring the Truth out to the American people.
I didn’t have a problem understanding his message, intent or interview.
BUT I can identify because I have experienced public service work and I was known as a “truth-teller” and “straight-shooter”. Needless to point out, in politics, that is not necessarily the wisest of moves; although I’ve have always been known to not be compliant with the “norm”……
Therefore, I understand this interview and thought it was worthwhile.
Outhouse and DonG have something in common. Both commented without listening to the entire interview. Perhaps that was inconvenient for either their time or their opinion but I do not believe either excuse is justified given the subject matter.
.
I did listen to the whole thing. Had anything changed, I would have said so with another comment. No specific details. Useless.
.
.
I get clients who sometimes do this. It’s frustrating.
I did listen to the entire interview. I listened for clear narratives (not there if you were not someone who already had lots of background information, true or false).
I listened for clear allegations, assertions of fact, details that could be introduced and then proved with evidence in a court of law. Not there. Almost all of it was useless.
It’s irrelevant to me how sincere he is.
.
Let’s pretend, for a moment, that his “testimony” is legitimate and righteous…
First, there’s nothing “new” here, to anyone who’s been paying attention.
Second, he’s not doing himself any favors, nor lending credibility to his narrative, by coming off as another Boomer “shouting at clouds”.
Third, I know (personally) some of the folks he references, and their position(s) does not align with his.
Lastly…. Thanks to Tucker for presenting an idea with no probing questions, or complete conclusions, thereby pretending to not know what’s evidently true despite “official” narrative.
The steel beams had a protective coating on them to prevent them from getting too hot in a fire. The planes that were flown into the buildings removed a lot of the protective coating and thousands of gallons of burning jet fuel did the rest. The buildings started collapsing from the point of impact of the planes. The explosions were compression explosions from when each floor collapsed onto the floor below it.
Built to withstand a 707 not 767. And sir, you are exactly correct about compression explosions. Hat tip
The fire did not melt the steel, it weakened until it could not support the weight. Center core construction collapsed straight down pancaking as it went causing the air in the bottom floors to vent through windows looking like explosions.
Plenty of studies proved the fires would not have stayed hot enough in any area long enough to melt. Those beams were massive
Plenty of studies have shown otherwise. Just my observation not intending any disrespect sir.
You do know a 707 and 767 are extremely similar, and carry almost exactly the same amount of fuel, right?
the 707 at cruising speed( as the towers were tested to withstand) had more energy than a 767 because its cruising speed was slower
Not only were the towers designed to survive crashes of large jet aircraft, but they were designed to potentially survive multiple plane crashes. This assertion is supported by Frank A. Demartini, the on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center, who said on January 25, 2001:
“The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door—this intense grid—and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting.”
Demartini appeared to be so confident that the towers would not collapse that he stayed behind, after the airplane impacts, to help save at least 50 people. As a result of his actions, he lost his life on 9/11.
Like the firefighters who perished in the WTC buildings, Demartini may very well have risked his life to save others, but the evidence suggests that he did not think he was endangering himself by simply going back into the building.
In addition, investigators from NIST who examined the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers told The New York Times in 2007 that newly disclosed documents from the 1960s show that the new York Port Authority, the original owners of Twin Towers, also considered aircraft moving at 600 mph, slightly faster and therefore more destructive than the ones that did hit the towers
Support
I’ve always believed the controlled demolition theory was concocted to take peoples eyes off the fact that the hijackers were “facilitated” by US Intelligence.
Asbestos coating?
With a hole in one side of the building created by the airplane, the floors above would have tipped over because the gravitational vertical and horizontal forces are no longer symmetrical at all stress points.. No building can pancake itself into its footprint in the absence of planned demolition.
This was pretty intense. Very passionate person. Someone asked why is this coming up now? Because he sees President Trump as an honest person who might actually want to know the truth and thinks the American people have a right to know the truth. I at this point think President Trump has enough to handle but this may be this man’s last chance to make the truth known. Bravo to him. God Bless him.
yeah, at least these topics are discussed again.
Thank God!
Now, I’ll give time for the Trump Team to work on this stuff. Maybe more whistle blowers can feel SAFE to come forward.
If whistle blowers came forward doing Clinton years , it was not that safe, if they came forward during Obama/Biden that would not be safe. If they came forward during Bush years (forget about it), not safe.
Is it SAFE now, I don’t know, what do you think?
Maybe some of the whistle blowers are old enough to not have to worry has much than when they had children, wife, and family.
Benny and Tucker are exposing some of this stuff, and I like it, just like Sundance too.
It would be nice to have some of these criminals arrested and given trial, and then jail. Will it ever happen?
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth | WTC Twin Towers and Building 7
If you watched the interview, you now know about “Bravo 7.” It is available online, and was produced by firefighters, NOT Hollywood. Take the time to watch it, and you will begin to understand what your government is prepared to do.
[2025] Firefighters Calling Out Bravo 7
It’s very simple China and the Democratic Party are one and the same. In other words China is a pile of dog shit and democrats are the flys that live in it.
quote
Tucker Carlson also sez deep state activity is necessary to preserve continuity of government in a system where power changes hands every four years. https://chroniclesmagazine.org/columns/the-new-social-revolution/
In order to form a more perfect union? The charade is beginning to tatter…
9/11 survivor, hero perseveres with conspiracy theories:
“…Employed at the WTC for 19 years as a maintenance worker, William Rodriguez – of Puerto Rican extraction – was responsible for the upkeep and safety of the stairwells within the 110-storey North Tower. On the morning of 9/11, he was the only person at the site with the master key to the North Tower stairwell doors.
Rodriguez was in the basement of the North Tower when American Airlines Flight 11 crashed into the building. He led firefighters up the stairs, unlocking doors as they climbed and helping hundreds of survivors. He says that he then went back into the building in a bid to rescue his friends at the top of the tower. He claims to be the last man pulled from the rubble by firefighters, although this has been disputed.
After the attacks Rodriguez received several awards for heroism and an invitation to a White House dinner where he was photographed with President George W. Bush.
Things went sour after he testified to the 9/11 Commission about the explosions in the WTC. In fact, his entire testimony was omitted along with that of numerous others that did not fit into the “official story.” Rodriguez claimed he heard an explosion in the North Tower before it was hit by American Airlines Flight 11. He not only claims he felt explosions coming from below the first sub-level while working in the basement, he says the walls were cracking around him and he pulled a man to safety by the name of Felipe David, who was severely burned from the basement explosions.
Rodriguez became prominent in the Latino community for helping to institute an economic amnesty program for victims of 9/11 who were undocumented workers.Subsequently, he traveled widely talking about his bomb theory and his experiences on 9/11, giving motivational lectures and discussing disaster management. Newspaper articles state that he raised $US122 million for the victims of 9/11.
In October 2004, Rodriguez filed a lawsuit (since dismissed) against the United States, the Bush family and others, alleging a massive conspiracy to commit and cover up the crimes of 9/11. The suit covered the gamut of 9/11 conspiracy theories and for good measure threw in accusations of election fraud, drug running and other crimes. It even suggested that United Flight 93 may have been shot down with a “high-powered microwave weapon.”
Since then, Rodriquez has mostly been shunned by the mainstream U.S. media and political establishment. He has, however, made a lucrative career in public speaking, often addressing packed meetings around the globe, including Venezuela, where he met with Nicolas Maduro, the nation’s anti-American president.” …….
It makes sense. That was an FBI Bomb given to the Blind Sheik in the 1992 WTC Bombing.
9/11, the Sandbox Wars and the Patriot Act were supposed to happen under the Clintons. But the Bomb was poorly placed in the basement. They made sure in 2001.
Those Saudis were hired by us. Anwar al Awlaki was Dirty Bob Mueller’s foreman and allowed to escape. After his role in coaching Nidal Hasan at Ft. Hood, Obama finally droned Awlaki to silence him.
It took me a long time to understand our own government attacked us. COVID finally made it clear to me and I can’t unsee it.
Dang.
I think they used both demolitions and then planes to hide it. They wanted to be sure the second time.
The Saudi terrorists were guilty, but fall guys, just like Sirhan, the Blind Sheik, Garland shooter, Pulse Nightclub guy, Capt. Hasan, Boston Marathon bros, etc. Even ISIS-K in Moscow are more Deep State Islamo-fall guys.
ps; when our airmen were bombed at Khobar Towers, Brennan was Station Chief…
After Mueller took over in 2001, he made it clear that you couldn’t say bad things about moeslems, and it filtered down to all of the DOJ. he also instituted the policy that all promotions in the FBI had to include a stint at the WFO to get “educated”.
Clintons
After 1992 the terrorists were the same as they’re projected today.
https://revolver.news/2024/05/fbi-sinister-anti-christian-patcon-program-internet-best-kept-secret-until-now/
(ps: correction: not 1992, but 1993 WTC Bombing by the FBI)
Did Tucker run out of alien UFO abductees?
Was a couple mi away from the GW Bridge that day and was listening to a rock station and the people in the towers calling in for the disc jockeys to call the FD because the phones were jammed. My FD scanner in the truck going crazy with dispatch calling different rigs and no response. Like yesterday. Curt is right on pertaining to the lost firemen, 343 gone in a flash.
Martin Armstrong’s belief regarding the collapsed of WTC7 and the Pentagon hit and that we knew ahead of time re: the Towers.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/new-evidence-that-world-trade-center-was-not-s-surprise-more-lies/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=RSS
Martin Armstrong is the most important person nobody has ever heard of (with all due respect to Sundance).
Yes. Sequel to The Forecaster is due out in about 3 weeks.
PDT called #7 a controlled demolition at the time. He would know.
Yes. There is a YT video of him being interview at ground zero and he says that.
I think we get hung up with the conspiracy theories. Regardless of what may, or may not have happened, The towers were taken down by terrorists. Terrorists named by the US government. I have not doubt that the USA’s CIA was involved. They ushered in the Patriot Act which made it legal for them to spy on us.
We need to look at the people that are using the meta data spy computers. Length of employment, ect… All within the alphabet agencies.
I was watching television on 9/11 when the program I was interrupted by coverage of the first building which had been hit. I watched the unfolding events for the rest of the day switching channels back and forth. Then in the following days videos taken by individuals were on the internet. These original videos are no longer available, only later reruns of copies are there now. Secondly the FBI started to follow the money invested on the stock markets. Weeks later the caught some on and made a big deal about it. Later it turned out to a coincidence that a swindler was involved and had nothing to do with 9/11. After that complete silence from the FBI’s investigation into anybody knew about 9/11 beforehand and profited by making incriminating purchases or sold short.
beforehand
If you have some spare time, here’s a 5 hour documentary on 9/11. Very detailed.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Lp81hoFneM4z/
Whatever happened to the Boeing 767 after it crashed into the tower?
Or the pentagon???
https://cr-v.su/forums/index.php?autocom=gallery&req=si&img=4025
I thought that this was a highly credible and factual account by Weldon. I was never a fan when he was in office but Sestak who replaced him was just as he described. Another faux non PA resident who ran and won from outside influence. We all know that 9/11 was a put on. We deserve to know the truth.
Just like the truth on JFK, RFK, and Epstein. Crickets……..
Wonder why no real discussion of the Able Danger program, the predecessor to the current NSA database? Remember Weldon categorically stating on the floor of the House that Mohammad Atta had been identified as Al Queda before the attack, but nothing was done.
Shaffer was part of the Able Danger program I believe Welden said.
Shaffer is well connected in the intelligence community. I would be inclined to listen to his testimony under oath about this subject.
I am surprised by many comments by posters that did not actually watch the whole video. There is a lot to digest and consider. As Dan Bongino says, I will look forward to the receipts.
I am keeping an open mind on this one.
I am not surprised.
nothing
Al-Qaeda sent anthrax letters after the attack so patriots would act.
A patriot actively declared his innocence of being with Al-Qaeda.
Turns out the patriot wasn’t acting and it wasn’t Al-Qaeda.
Patriots did act to make bio-security, national security.
Disinterested patriots may not act like patriots act.
This was from 6 days ago.
Tucker and Alex Jones.
Beginning of interview they discussed
9/11.
Very Interesting!
The information about the X-Files episode
The Lone Gunman the spring before 9/11…basically the same
scenario of 9/11—-and the CIA involvement in the episode.
😳 😳 😳
A lot of great information in this interview.
Worth watching!
Alex Jones: Trump, Israel, Secret WW3 Plans, Dire Wolf Resurrection, Infowars Reporter Assassination – YouTube
scenario
Operation Northwoods, may have been written before the episode.
how is donald rumsfeld his goto reference? is this guy joking? something off here in this conversation piece.
Rumsfeld is a known unknown
joking
Maybe it’s still April fools.
shame tucker did have the chutzpah to ask about cofer black with this cutout guy…
Italians have a saying… the truth, after the fact, won’t help you much.
“There will be a yearning… for the future and not the grievances of the past.”
–Jeb Bush
“I can imagine what can be and be unburdened by what has been.”
–Kamala Harris
Crossfire Hurricane 5: Build Back Burdens
https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/politics/2016/02/14/80367822/
Forget collapsing buildings, etc.
The fact that the Patriot Act was passed just 6 weeks after 9/11 is proof that:
A) it was prepared and written well before 9/11, and
B) like Trump’s attempted assassination in Butler, it was an inside (US govt) job.
A) Remember the Maine!
B) Remember McKinley!
“Build Crooks Better” – USAID
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113957815659314093
The video documentary produced by Firefighters that Curt Weldon recommends can be found on youtube (for now) under “Calling Bravo 7” or on Rumle as “Bravo 7.”
Bravo 7 – Firefighters Demand 9⁄11 Justice (2020 documentary)
Rumble
Watched the whole thing…
So Good.
So much more to be said..
As Trump often says…”We will see..”
Tower was taken out by preplanted detonations from the top down.
911 was a setup or ploy to be the catalyist to the policestate we live in today.
https://ae911truth.org
“Fifteen Nine Elevens” – Jihadi Joe
This conversation is either a limited hangout, or he only understands part of the story. Yes, there was a massive coverup. No, the buildings were not taken down by plane impacts. What Weldon proposed is remarkable enough, but it is only scratching the surface of the real story, which is orders of magnitude more horrific.
Cognitive dissonance setting in at first mention of the towers not falling due to plane impacts? No worries. Please look at the architects and engineers for 911 truth report. Don’t like physics or structural analysis much? Not a problem. Study the many examples of modern steel frame composite structures being subjected to significant fires, and also being hit by planes. See what usually happens when aluminum planes hit buildings. Do the wings cut through steel beams and concrete? What happens when a steel frame structure burns? Does it collapse on itself in free fall? Look into the Grenfell tower apartments fire in the UK, this is a useful illustration. There are plenty of examples out there for you to see for yourself, if you want to start considering the truth. It might be easier not to do that, actually, the world makes more sense. But if you want to, you can.
Study plane impacts in general. Learn the aerodynamics of commercial aircraft, specifically on the relationship between velocity, altitude, lift and drag. How fast do large commercial aircraft move at 1000 feet? What happens when they accelerate? We could go on into many other things, but we won’t, as long as this awful event remains the bridge that can’t be crossed. It’s too difficult for the vast majority to get there, and I do understand that.
impacts
https://rumble.com/v5b1842-911.html
Considering the millions of people killed or harmed since 9/11, 3000 people snuffed out to advance an agenda seems quite plausible.
I listened to the whole Tucker interview. I watched the entire Bravo 7 video. I read all the comments regarding the destruction of Building #7 – Fire or Controlled Demolition. What I haven’t read are any comments on the young men who were sent to Afghanistan to search for Bin Laden when we knew he was being protected by Iran. How many men and women were wounded and killed in Afghanistan believing they were serving a cause greater than themselves – The Freedom of the American People. Americans deserve to know the truth about 9-11 and the firefighters can lead the way as they sacrificed their lives for strangers. Justice demands accountability!
bin Laden wasn’t punished. He was silenced.
They always need a “Jack Ruby”.
Everything’s fraud, including 9-11.
all I know is
Re your #3. I lived in Lake Suzy, FL at the time, south of Venice and Sarasota. I remember reading about a very expensive home in Sarasota, in a gated community, that was owned by Saudis and it looked like they just got up and left in a hurry. Food was on the table, clothes in the closet, etc. DH and I also drove by the airport where some of the hijackers were supposedly trained. Just a tiny little place.