President Trump has given remarks supporting National Security Advisor Mike Waltz during an interview with NBC.
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump stood by his national security adviser, Mike Waltz, after The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief was accidentally added to a private, high-level chat on the messaging app Signal where military plans were being discussed.
“Michael Waltz has learned a lesson, and he’s a good man,” Trump said Tuesday in a phone interview with NBC News.
When asked what he was told about how Goldberg came to be added to the Signal chat, Trump said, “It was one of Michael’s people on the phone. A staffer had his number on there.”
Trump said Goldberg’s presence in the chat had “no impact at all” on the military operation.
The president expressed confidence in his team, saying he was not frustrated by the events leading up to The Atlantic’s story. The situation, Trump said, was “the only glitch in two months, and it turned out not to be a serious one.” (more)
The rest of the DC setup is transparently clear. (1) Goldberg held the story until the day before a long-scheduled Senate Intelligence Committee hearing. (2) The SSCI then used the hearing to blast the heads of the Trump administration intelligence silos on the issue of “classified” information in the text messages.
♦ The next act in this well-known performance will be for Democrats to demand the release of the Signal App transcript, if it’s not classified, then there’s nothing to hide.
♦ Public pressure via narrative drum-pounding will continue to increase, until the chat messages are released to congress. [Keep in mind, Jeffrey Goldberg likely already has them.]
♦ Everyone in the chat group will then be told they must recuse themselves from internal silo determinations as to the classified status of the conversation. More public pressure will be generated to achieve this “position of conflict” demand.
♦ The Intelligence Community, without the heads of the silos – likely leveraging the internal investigative agents of the FBI (INSD), will then say the content of the chat was indeed classified, TSCI level. There will be weeks and months of leaks to the media as each granular detail is discussed ad infinitum.
♦ The cabinet members will then face the drumbeat of resignation demands, and/or useful impeachment fodder for ‘lying to congress’ during today’s Senate Select Committee on Intelligence testimony.
At least that should be the anticipated approach by the “Seven Ways from Sunday” group, who operate to defend the interests of the Intelligence Community from agency heads like those who were on the Signal App chat group.
We’ve all watched this play before.



Is it possible that Goldberg saw a fake chat? To set him and the SSCI democrats up. They will look at Goldberg’s transcript and then compare that to Hegseths, Tulsi’s et al’s transcript which won’t be identical. They did the same thing to Vindman during the call with Z but the democrats impeached Trump anyway.
No.
Someone set someone up, it shouldn’t be hard to prove with Elon’s super sleuths, and Tusli’s expertise..
Only a question of who was fooling who.
Arrest the staffer for attempted insurrection.
Enough is enough.
Pre-dawn raid, with a heads up to RSBN.
Turnabout . . .
Remember, POTUS knew Vindman was a snake, even as he was speaking on the phone.
Damn, this is a very, very, very looooong game.
Are we there yet?
Brought to you by the Deep State Khazarian Mafia… Proud to be making money off both sides in every war since the French Revolution of 1789!!!!!!
When you are on a chat, doesn’t the screen show the names/screen names of everyone participating?
It should
Showed initials : JG.
Just be like the Dems: blame it on a staffer, fire them, and move on like nothing happened.
And where’s Marco?
Standing outside the Mierda Splash Zone.
Wuz he warned?
Wuz he involved?
That was my first inclination, Little Marco. There has to be a mole or maybe two. They know they will be watched even closer now.
That actually bodes worse for Rubio, since if he did know the game, he was obligated to let someone know.
I have no experience with this app. But with only the app’s tutorial found on Youtube, it’s impossible that adding this journo was an accident. What I don’t know is if a person joining is announced. I suspect it would be… NORMALLY which would mean the people already in conversation would have known unless a FALSE NAME was used but that wouldn’t make sense either.
That said, US Intel operatives can compromise ANY phone at any time. The app itself is open source which means it can be modified at the source code level, recompiled and installed to the users’ devices changing the behavior of the apps. But a compromised device is really all that’s necessary as they could simply capture screenshots as presented by the journo.
To produce the output in this article, all that is needed is a story line and the screenshots. The screenshots could have been presented by rogue intel actors with instructions of the story line for publication.
We have NO reason to believe the journo was even in the chat at all. All we know is that this article was published and that it contains screenshots of the chat which has apparently been confirmed as genuine. No one has confirmed the journo’s presence in the chat is genuine and we should all recognize that there are OTHER WAYS (at least six ways from Sunday) to create this story… and they are far more simple than actually inserting a journo into a live conversation using this app.
Very good post, the technical aspects have yet to be discussed let alone the ever present need for the left to implement deception at every turn of events.🖖🏻
I’m a green pea when it comes to this stuff, but it seems to me that if the communists wanted to make Trump’s team appear incompetent–and thereby lay the groundwork for someone’s termination or resignation–why was Goldberg the one and only lucky fellow to have been included in the chat? Wouldn’t it make more sense to create a wider security breach/failure by having multiple unauthorized individuals mistakenly invited into the chat?
Of course, the usual suspects will try to spin gold out of this, but I don’t see what the big deal is. IF Goldberg wasn’t supposed to be there, why do they expect us to believe that he was the only one and that there weren’t others?
I’m inclined to believe that it was not a “mistake” on the part of some staffer, but rather it was intentional. But if intentional, it would seem pretty obvious that it’s a setup, which raises the obvious questions about who what where how and why.
But now we will have to put up with the dramatic charade from Congress critters. It’s just nauseating
You raise an interesting point about possible unknown others in on the chat.
It is suspicious that Congress is on top of this instanter. Also, gallery packed complete with demonstrators (troublemakers).
Failing the sniff test?
Absolutely. Stinks to high heaven.
I’m inclined to believe that Goldberg was the only person mistakenly included in the chat, but my overall point is that it’s too coincidental for that to be the case. Incompetence or carelessness in that situation would more likely have resulted in a much bigger security failure.
If the public falls for the “oopsie” here, then we are in a heap of trouble. This Goldberg clown and his friends are playing dangerous games, but who’s surprised?
If adding a person to the app the intel guys are using can be an accident, that is an in your face reason the signal app should not be used for intel chit chats.
What if a huthie or two were added, ah shucks by accident.
Makes the whole thang sound worse.
Yes, like maybe someone in the chat officially sent the transcript to the journo.
Or Derps intercepting and recording it surreptitiously.
My inclination is to look to – and AT – the Chief of Staff and staffers who set up meetings and the systems used for those meetings.
there wer 18 peoplel there where were the rest
Probably happy they aren’t in the group being targeted by this Derp State plot.
I have held and attended group meetings online. All participants are visible by the organizing party unless he/she wants to hide their participation. Of course the meeting could be compromised by someone with technical knowhow.
Hey Team Trump, this is a repeat of the 2017 elimination of Mike Flynn as National Security Advisor. Don’t fall for it. Most likely, somebody close to Walz on the NSC – somebody with access to his accounts – sent the Signal chat invite to Goldberg. The express purpose was to set him up and get him eliminated. The NSA is a massive power center in the White House and that person needs to be fully under Deep State control because Walz is not Senate confirmed.
Part II of this story is the use of Signal instead of the controlled and monitored networks the IC and DoD maintain – JWICS, SIPRNet, etc. Every chat, IM, email, file, keystroke, etc. on those government classified networks is captured and analyzed. That’s almost certainly a primary source of leaks from the IC to places like the New York Times and Washington Post. “People will knowledge of the matter” = “spies monitoring White House communications over classified IT and telecomm networks”.
So, just like how the Trump Team did not use the “presidential transition” team inside the permanent government, Team Trump is using Signal to evade monitoring by the Deep State.
They’re trying to kill two birds with one stone. Take out Walz + eliminate the use of Signal.
It’s not enough for Trump to stand by Walz. His best strategy is an ATTACK strategy. “In 2017, the FBI and DOJ framed Gen. Mike Flynn and used the ensuing prosecution to have him removed as National Security Advisor. This created an attack vector by the deep state on my Administration and the Russia hoax was escalated once they got rid of Mike. I am not making that mistake this time. Mr. Walz has not only my full trust and confidence, but I will unequivocally state that removing my National Security Advisor is a key goal of those who want to try and stop me from Making America Great Again. And we’re not falling for it.”
Losing a lot of cred for a post that might have value simply by not appearing to know the difference between Waltz and Walz.
They are QUITE DIFFERENT PEOPLE.
^losing a lot of cred bitching about a misspelled name.
You should apologize, and correct the posting, using the correct name. You do post informative info… what’s so difficult about acknowledging an important error, hokkoda?
It really wasn’t that important, and the call out was unnecessarily rude.
Not really. 1 is a Bushite 1 is full blown Death Cult.
i just read Walz and Goldberg danced in the same Social Circles, and Walz let Goldber know 2 days ahead so whats w all that?
i would definitely do that too. go on offense against the SSCI, commit to finding out who is trying to set it up and expose them, and refuse to comment further until thats known
I would send Patel/Gabbard/Ratcliffe to the SSCI hearings and have them repeat the same, exact, statement:
“A fraud was used to remove Mike Flynn as National Security Advisor in 2017. The National Security Council would later be used to launch the fraudulent Ukraine impeachment. We believe this to be an attempt to have Mr. Waltz (hey, I spelled it right @pietrodleon!) removed as National Security Advisor, AND WE ARE NOT TAKING THE BAIT. Instead, we are launching an investigation into whether this perfectly legitimate meeting was leaked to the media by a #resistance staffer on the National Security Council. We’re seizing that person’s emails and cell phone and are conducting a full investigation. We will assume until proven otherwise, that issues like this are concocted to harm the Executive Branch and to remove strategically important people…like Mike Waltz.”
And…
“We cannot comment about an ongoing investigation”
(Turnabout is fair play.
Make the investigation never-ending)
Because of the sensitivity of the matter.
This analysis makes the most logical sense so far. Obviously, there is a mole/CIA plant working under Walz, who was in Saudi when the chat was initiated, so the staffer is complicit. Same playbook as they used on Flynn, then they go down the line and try to pick off cabinet secretaries one by one. Wash Rinse Repeat.
An on-going investigation so no comment-that’s the Go-To answer.
Precisely…
I was gonna float that idea. The traditional secured networks, aren’t. It would not surprise me at all if a backdoor was built in to allow the black ops to monitor in an unofficial capacity. Considering what they have done in the past, why wouldn’t there be?
There is NO SUCH THING as secure comms for the common man….
Agree attack strategy is warranted here.
Gold berg’s handling of the situation should be the never ending talking point. The press has ZERO credibility. Why did Goldberg handle it as he did ….everything he did seems so suspicious. Break it down ad nauseam. Is the press treasonous?
Magazines aren’t profitable anymore without outside funds coming in. Where does the Atlantic get its funding these days? $10,000 subscriptions? USAID NGO’s?
You’re right.
Attack!
Attack!
Attack!
What ‘they’ did to Gen Flynn should NOT be allowed to happen again.
Whoever added the ‘journo’ needs to be fired – now.
If the CIA set up the meeting –
THEY need to be investigated
Fired
Tried
Now.
It is THEY who
‘Compromised National Security’.
Attack!!!
Let go back to using pigeons for message intel.
Or cryptic smoke signals?
Manual typewriters and “eyes only” with an attached routing (buck) slip with return to originator.
Signal mirrors..
Think we will see in a couple months incoming new National Security Advisor Michael Flynn?
Contrived BullShit is what l see
Much Ado about nothing of importance!!
Especially if Goldbrick was the messenger of said manure.
I recall Hillary’s responses to the House Select Committee on Benghazi, “… at this point what difference does it make!” There was no compromise of any national security secrets and I don’t believe any American lives were lost. Woulda, shoulda, coulda are not grounds for removal. Tempest in a teapot with Democrap Senators, such as Mark Warner, spewing steam from their ears over a great big nothing burger.
“Have you no decency, Sir?!!”
Emoting for the cameras, MarxMerdia pre-prepared to misreport and amplify.
Who needs facts or truth, or even a sensible story line?
Is this staffer someone hired after Jan 20 or a hold-over from before Jan 20? I would be prepared to accept that this person is inexperienced and made a mistake if hired after the inauguration by a Waltz or some other Republican manager who is also new on the job. However, no one who is a hold-over from before the inauguration should be allowed any benefit of the doubt. In fact, no hold-over should be trusted at all (that would be over 2 million of them) until they have proven themselves honorable and trustworthy. If it was a hold-over, then this could have been a setup and that is the starting point from which anyone wanting to get to the bottom of this should proceed.
Perhaps it’s literally an impossibility, but there should be NO … ZERO … holdovers in sensitive or sensitive-adjacent positions.
Are the snakes trying to pretend at the SSCI hearing that the reporter withheld TS info from what we have all read from the thread?
They are trying to pretend this isn’t a Derp State op that they’ve been in on from the get go.
I do not trust Michael Waltz.
Get him out and put Micheal Flynn in
His family is certainly untrustworthy.
What’s the difference between Anwar al-Awlaki and Jeff Goldberg?
Both hold/held dual citizenship dividing their loyalty.
Goldberg apparently sat quietly eve dropping then used the info to build anti-American sentiment in the EU, as well as specifically in that region. This sure looks like an intentional (for profit) leak done to thwart peace.
Goldberg admits he knew he wasn’t supposed to be privy to the discussion. Then he intentionally has used this information for profit. His conduct put American lives at risk across the globe and specifically in that region.
Doesn’t that make Goldberg a traitor?
He is no different than Anwar al-Awlaki.
Find a statute that applies…
And roast him with it.
Dan B should haul Goldberg’s ass into FIB.
Such trickery most likely put in place by the last administration. Trump just had to replace the desk in the Oval office because they found bugs in it.
Let them beat their dismal little drums, they are so worn no one hears the beat anymore.
Trump is moving to the beat of his own drum.
It seems like a good idea to for Waltz to be asked to join Vivek’s campaign team.
😆😆💯
We don’t know anything yet. And Trump has effectively said “so what?” to this. What we know is the story in the article and that the screenshots have been confirmed. Unless you’re willing to take the time to experiment with Signal, I am operating under the assumption that (1) the invitation cannot be done by accident as the invitation would require either having that contact already on the device or the email address for the contact so that an invitation could be sent (2) to produce these screenshots, all any IC operator would need to do is compromise one of the devices and take screenshots, then share them with the journo with instructions to write the story as we saw presented. This covers for the rogue IC operators. And if the meeting WAS compromised with this journo joining, how did no one see the message indicating that “this guy” joined? I doubt such a thing would escape notice. And if you want to guess at whose phone(s) was/were compromised, look at the names associated with the messages in each screenshot. If you see a name, it’s not going to be from the compromised phone.
I think it’s useful and important to note that the published screenshots were of TWO DIFFERENT PHONES. If this journo captured both, why would he use two different phones? If not, then the lack of messages from “Me” in this collection of messages suggests there are at least two phones compromised.
If we had a complete list of names in the chats, the compromised phones might be identified based on elimination.
Trump might have already been advised of this and, as we saw in C19, he “went along with it” without giving in to the intentions of the bad actors. If he tips his hand, they would undoubtedly escalate.
https://erroneus0.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/signal.webp
https://erroneus0.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/signal2.webp
https://erroneus0.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/signa3l.webp
If these were actually from the same device, then there must be a reason the screenshots were so carefully cropped… hiding something useful or important.
Thanks for the education, Daniel. Detailed “explainations” are important to those of us who do not engage with all of the ‘gadgets’ and ‘apps’ of today’s world.
I’m one of the so-called ‘mediocre’ citizens Vivek insulted in his anti-American diatribe. I have an M.A., have worked and traveled in the US and abroad, grew up in an impoverished, multi-ethnic coal mining area where all community members respected each other and were especially patriotic and tolerant of religious diversity.
Haven’t had a TV for 20 years—my husband and I were satisfied with PBS and the 3 legacy channels.
Trump is too enamored of the tech guys. How he could endorse V. for Ohio Gov. is mystifying. V. is a toothy, grinning prima donna in lifts who must dominate every conversation. He won’t get my vote.
(The Brits just designated a non-native born Muslim, educated by memorizing the Quran, as head of their Department of Education. Wonder how that will turn out for them?)
Go d bless America.
It all comes down to whom ever had the bright idea to go ahead and use Signal, because it was already set up, sitting there “and the other guys used it, so it should be fine”.. if “Staffers” made the call on the chat, why? Apologies in advance if this has already been posted.
This may be “a spanner thrown in the gears” of 47s Tour de Force.
This was a setup. The report did not name the officials who commented on the story (“Top Trump Officials Debated War Plans on Unclassified Chat Shared With Journalist, Wall Street Journal). Instead, this article cited “U.S. officials” and intelligence agencies. You know, the Deep State.
And how was it that a “journalist” from The Atlantic–a Robert Kagan/Victoria Nuland outfit–just happened to be the one connected to the Signal app?
This fish is rotten from its head.
“how was it that a ‘journalist’ from the Atlantic….just happened to be the one connected to the Signal app?”
Catching rats, including human rats, requires setting right trap and choosing the appropriate rat tempting bait.
In this case, my bunch is that this bait and this trap caught a lot of rats rather than just theis one rat whos an infamous “journalist” who works at the infamous derp state rats nest known as The Atlantic.
Bottom line, thank God DJT is famously ruthless plus patient AND thank God he was re elected.
BREAKING – White House says security leak row a ‘coordinated’ distraction attempt
READ: https://t.co/k8QEglh2Bj
Follow @InsiderPaper for more news
https://t.me/insiderpaper/34575
What does it mean to “recuse oneself from internal silo determinations as to the classified status of the conversation. ”
If it’s above your pay grade, you shouldn’t be involved…
.
I believe that means that any determination as to each represented agency’s capability of pronouncing the ‘classification status’ of the whole affair should not now include these heads of those agencies . . .
.
In other words, render these agency heads impotent from any goings-on in their agencies . . .
💯
Only those with a PhD in Gobbledygook could understand.
Oh look who decided to grace a Derp State operation story!
Tav, the Alpha and Omega of Make America Look At This, and General Inanity.
Understood. Thanks.
So designate someone else go to the meetings and report back? Heck, who knows? Maybe Trump doesn’t want Waltz or someone else to get the classified info.
Get Elon and his cadre of Mensa Geeks on the job. They can figure it all out in 15 minutes
@sundance and the treepers, just for laughs and making heads explode what would all of you think if 47 politely asked Waltz to waltz his way off stage left and then from stage right bring on Dun! Dun! Dun! Mike Flynn as National Security Advisor. lol.
I would do a cartwheel in my living room
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Haha 😆 😂 😛 😜
If only the SSCI were as interested in the litany of abused intelligence incidents in the former previous Maladministration..
It’s weird that I deleted “former” before I posted above.
Why is it only on this site that my device deploys unsolicited “Auto-insert/Auto-editing”.. it’s not as bad on iPhone.. any theories, tech savvy Treehousers?
.
No, no theories.
Just another inquiry for those tech savvy:
The blue color of the generic avatar is a different shade for some treepers.
I only just now noticed mine has gone from the teal shade to the cobalt shade, just today, while others’ are still in teal mode . . .?
I just assumed the shade changes were a dysfunction of my old eyes. Guess not!
Weird..
Interesting observation…
I’ve seen that business too, and couldn’t figure why it happens.
Auto Smell Stinks!
I blame Derps.
It’s a bit flattering but mostly terrifying the losers fell the need to shut my fresh mouth..
Really, F em all.
There is so much truth and sunlight that could be rained down on corrupt clowns like Mark Warner.
But it never happens.
Because they are all compromised and the truth is suicide.
Ultimately it all comes down to accountability, as the captain of the ship you are responsible for every and all actions on board your ship. That being said do I think that any one will be held accountable? The answer is no but someone needs to be fired and someone needs to say “I take responsibility and accept this FUBAR for what it is and promise it will never happen again.
Bottom line, no one in these high level Govt positions should use ANY electronic device, especially when matter of national security are being discussed.
Not true, there are some very good applications that use fractal technology to encrypt comms, they are so good that they are considered illegal to use (because the NSA cannot crack them) , unless you work for Uncle Sam.
This somehow reminds me of when Newt was Speaker, and had content from a purportedly sensitive cell phone call publicized by a Dem operative who JUST SO HAPPENED to have heard the call on the op’s own cell phone because “the wires crossed”. And no reporter looked into the complete improbability of such a scenario actually occurring. I’m no great fan of Waltz, but I’m smelling the same rat.
Who benefits is who done it.
Furthermore, I consider that the Derp State MUST be destroyed!!
“Means and motive”..
And impunity derived from immunity.
I think the same thing. What PTrump said happened is not clear either. So Waltz has an aid who got the number and gave it to the reporter and that is ok? That’s what does not make sense. I am wondering if someone else or someone in the meeting sent the transcript to the reporter….maybe Waltz or Rubio? I don’t know but something is not right here.
re: “who JUST SO HAPPENED to have heard the call on the op’s own cell phone”
No, he was using a scanner … you can look that up.
I paid attention to that story I was a cellular RF engineer at the time … I still think he was possibly the ‘release source’ with perhaps deep state actors having intercepted that call, and the contents were ‘put out’ by that individual …
One of the phones in the group of people, perhaps more than one phone, has been mirrored; is this a possibility?
Dems make a big deal out of this but nothing when Biden messed up the Afghanistan debacle, no bid deal for Hillie when she messed up with Benghazi debacle, and deleted thousands of messages off her personal server. I think the world will survive
Likely some sort of CIA-sponsored attack on USA will happen soon, and the Ds will be claiming that the leaky security apparatus of President Trump is to blame.
Let’s move on here. Bigger fish to fry
Like this one?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/new-low-rep-jasmine-crockett-physically-attacks-journalist/
Lock Her Up. File charges for giving aid and comfort to terrorists before she bonds out for assault.. if I can figure it out maybe there’s a position open at DOJ?
“We’ve all watched this play before.”
Yes, we have, and it’s about damn time we (Trump) start(s) counter-playing against these mofo’s.
When are we going to start learning the cold, hard truth about what’s been going on in Washington? If DOGE were able to look at the bank accounts of the politicians and NGO operators in D.C., 98 out of a hundred of them would show ill-gotten gains.
They’re all corrupt. Every damn one of these lawfare, pearl-clutching, micro-aggression-offended bastards doing absolutely nothing to actually help this country. Actually, they’re robbing the country. Blind.
Money. F’g money. They’ll do anything to get more of it. For themselves. For their family and friends. It’s the satanic ingredient behind every decision that’s made in D.C. By it’s very nature, and how much you have of it, it gives false prestige, faux importance, elitist feelings of grandeur, improved social status and elbow-rubbing, and all the other inherent deficiencies of moral failure.
I doubt we’ll ever see the end of it. Unless it’s disclosed.
Disclose everything. Please.
Fake News! Even if Trump is “covering for it.” Actual communications like these do not occur in “public” chat-rooms, such that “a journalist” even could(!) be added to them. // I have no idea what anyone was thinking here, but I know what not to believe.
Trump is losing badly right now. The CIA and fbi still exist. His EOs are tied up for the remainder of the year. Doge is way short of the $1T goal. Bondi and Kash are fake. And Congress won’t do spending bills for 3 months.
.
Well , appears to me America is winning in spite of your claims
You’ve got me all concerned, Sall!
My suggestion for Trump to respond to the Signal incident.
“Obviously a mistake was made. We’re looking closely at what occurred and will, as we always do, take steps to improve our processes going forward. An interesting side note from this is this sudden interest from the Democrats regarding our national security….something I have not noticed in the past. I suspect this is just another opportunity to make a political attack…but if this newfound interest in national security on the part of Democrats is genuine, this marks a turning point and one that is welcome”
Sounds like this was set up well in advance. Maybe this is what Carville was talking about, and he had inside info on it.
Anyone remember the Mark Warner brouhaha? It remains an open question:
Did Senator Mark Warner ever report speaking to a Russian?
https://fullspectrumdominoes.wordpress.com/2019/06/15/did-senator-markwarner-ever-report-speaking-to-a-russian/
CUT THE CORD
as noted on these pages before with cameras in record mode there needs to be a 5am flash bang visit to one of the bad guys like judge bosscyberborg. get his personal computer and stick the hubble telescope up his a@@ like they did others. remember, the same actions were perpetrated on the good guys using absurd rationale. garland gave shoot to kill orders on pdjt in the stupid mar-a-lago raid on an admin charge. eff-em.
This isn’t 2016. Distrust for the IC is at an all time high and their ability to influence the public through their partners in the fake and gay media is at an all time low. They don’t have the juice. We are on the cusp of an emergent right-wing authoritarianism that will be wildly popular if Trump will only seize the moment. Then cleaning out the rat’s nest will actually be possible. Dark but necessary thoughts.
A potempkin village ploy to keep us distracted and occupied soap opera style.
As the signal turns soap opera.
A teaser everyday to tune into As The Signal turns for the next episode.
😳
Who is the staffer?
Tempest meet Teapot.
Treepers, meet our serially banned foreign Derp State troll.
Mysteriously still allowed to re-invade our conversation.
I don’t understand how anyone – I mean, not just in the White House – but any American would conduct a meeting on an app and expect it to not be “leaky” –
remembering the app called “Angry Birds” that was so popular – turned out to be “leaky” and somehow someway the NSA was able to scoop up tons of user private information –
if the Director of the CIA, Mr. Ratliffe actually and truly said that the Signal app was on his computer when he started there and he just assumed it was OK? That sounds too trusting or passive, IMHO.
My Mom and I found all 12 seasons (1984-1996) of “Murder, She Wrote” available through the Peacock channel – last night, in one of the episodes (which I think is in season 8), Jessica Fletcher had her computer set up to help her with her college job (she was teaching a writing class) and the guy doing the set up had loaded a program onto her computer without her knowledge which would go in and scan whatever she had typed on her computer and then “send” everything to another computer – with the plan being that the person who set up this system would find things with which he could blackmail her (as he had with other people whose computers he had also set up).
Someone had tried to reach Jessica on the phone and they had gotten a busy signal but how could that be? Apparently the computer was in the dormant mode (electricity on but sleeping) and “woke up” to send the file at 4 in the morning. Anyway, it seemed so anciently old, the entire set-up but really, what else is new, that people aren’t always looking for ways to get in where they are not supposed to be! It’s only gotten worse!
Dear President Trump,
Turn about is fair play.
Time to start setting up members of the Deep State, SSCI, and others in similar fashion.
Yes, and I’d add that it’ll be interesting to see what all happens on the way to Vance/Rubio …and whether that even happens.
A pre-emptive investigation of wealth over and above that legally earned might turn out to quieten down both the RINOS and Democrats suddenly aquired enthusiasm for openess in Politics.
OK – I am certainly NOT excusing what has happened here and it is a major embarrassment for Team Trump. We don’t need these distractions because of course the liberal media blows it way out of proportion. That said, these same people who are all up in arms over it were quite silent during the Benghazi attack and the disastrous Afghan withdrawal. Funny huh? Yet nothing was harmed and no one died here, but they will drone on about this for God knows how long!
That is when you release the sexual deviancy slush fund list or at least a list composed of all the initials who partook of slush fund funds. Make sure they match the initials of troublemakers who opened their yaps today.
Yes, perhaps it’s time to fire up the D.C. sludge pump and let it flow. Expose all of them. Names, dates, places and amounts paid or received. Their voters and supporters will want to fry them.
I LIKE IT! 😃
Bingo, ma’am!
Simple fix.
Indict and imprison the staffer responsible. Arrest him/her today, with charges by the weekend.
This action insulates the heads of the silos.
Someone will need to be sacrificed. The sooner the better.
Based on the reports of what was said in the meeting, it is obvious that this was a set up for the Atlantic. The conversation centered around how to tell the story for the greatest effect. Several points were made. First, the Houti’s had to be dealt with. Second, only the US has the capability to do it. Third, it is the EU that benefits most, so they should pay. Finally, how do we break this news so it is most clearly and effectively promulgated without inappropriate backlash.
So ask yourself, what is the conversation? That the US was bad to attack and secure the Suez canal for shipping? Are the useful idiots among the dems complaining about that? No, they were distracted by a shinny object. Seems everyone on this site was as well.
The White House has said, No harm, no foul. Was there a second purpose to the meeting–to identify an unauthorized leaker? Maybe, but I don’t think so. I think the leak was deliberate and well known to everyone including the President. Not that leaks happen in DC….
Nailed It!
First reports are always wrong. Warner is always a POS. Tell him to eff right off. Burn the staffer and move on. OTOH EU now knows we think they are weak BS artists. Would also let DOGE take a look at the comms for an IC back door. Be interesting if the IC holdouts are attempting sabotage. How is Leavenworth this time of year?
OTOH EU now knows we think they are weak BS artists.
If they didn’t already know this, they’re idiots.
Because they know perfectly well themselves that they are exactly that.
I don’t like it. Waltz could have easily handled this, by claiming exactly what Trump was saying. And it (“Signalgate”) will be over in no time at all.
But no, he relied on numerous others (Gabbard, Ratcliff, et al.) to make public statements for way too complicated explanations. Not to mention all sorts of online opinionators.
learned a lesson, he some kind of rookie, what lesson did he learn