When you understand how Washington DC Judges view their role and responsibility, then you understand the scale of opposition that President Trump is facing. The false media framework of our “government” only makes the issues worse. So, here’s an explanation of Boasberg v Trump.
In 2016 the DOJ-NSD headed by Mary McCord filed a FISA application seeking a Title-1 search (full and unlimited) surveillance warrant against the leading presidential candidate, Donald Trump. The method to gain the surveillance authority was to use CIA informant Carter Page who had met with the Trump campaign and call Page an “agent of a foreign power.”
The FISA Court knowingly and with specific intent approved the Title-1 surveillance warrant which was filed using false evidence (Clinesmith) and sketchy supporting documents (Steele Dossier), no Woods File was attached.
At the time of the application, Mary McCord was acting head of the DOJ National Security Division. McCord was responsible for filing the warrant application. The DOJ-NSD had no inspector general oversight. The targeting of candidate Donald Trump was entirely for political purposes and intents.
After President Trump won the 2016 election, he gave DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz authority to conduct oversight over the DOJ-NSD. IG Horowitz started investigating the FISA application. This is where things get interesting.
The FISA Court (FISC) was exposed by their willful blindness in allowing the Title-1 targeting of Donald Trump.
Justice John Roberts is in charge of the FISC.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts then appointed Judge James Boasberg to the position of presiding judge over the FISA Court (FISC).
Judge Boasberg then selected Mary McCord to be an amicus or advisor to the court as Horowitz was investigating the fraudulent FISA application.
Boasberg put the person who was in charge of submitting the false FISA application in a position to filter the results of the Horowitz investigation of that same FISA application.
In essence, think of this as protecting the Judicial Branch. Justice Roberts appointed Boasberg to defend the FISC from scrutiny. Boasberg then moves Mary McCord into position to defend the FISC from scrutiny (McCord also protects herself).
At the time, Mary McCord’s husband Sheldon Snook was working within Justice Robert’s office.
That’s how John Roberts, James Boasberg and Mary McCord all connect. All the motives and intents go back to that original Title-1 FISA application.
Remember, this was a huge scandal all by itself. The FISA Court permitted a full-throated surveillance warrant against the leading presidential candidate, Donald Trump. The Judicial Branch was intentionally influencing the 2016 election. These are not stupid people; they were not duped, conned or fooled, they knew exactly what they were doing.
After appointing Mary McCord to take up a defensive position for herself and the FISA Court (cover), Judge Boasberg then becomes the presiding judge in the case against the FBI agent who falsified the FISA application, Kevin Clinesmith. Boasberg gives Clinesmith a slap on the wrist and a few months’ probation (more cover).
This is the same Judge Boasberg gave J6 FBI agent provocateur Ray Epps a sentence of probation. This is the same judge who, on his vacation, went to sit in the DC courtroom to observe defendant President Trump who was forced to appear in DC court. This is the same Boasberg who established a horrible precedent by forcing Vice-President Mike Pence to testify before a DC grand jury about his conversations with President Trump (breaking executive privilege).
♦ Now we go back to the John Durham investigation, because Bill Barr had to ask Presiding Judge Boasberg for guidance and direction as the Durham team looked at the FISA application (Title-1 surveillance warrant) against the backdrop of the Obama government targeting Donald Trump.
This is June of 2020, Bill Barr (who was running another cover-up angle) asked Judge Boasberg for guidance on five very specific issues centering around the Carter Page FISA application. Barr asked for legal guidance to assist John Durham in disclosing information in the FISA file & evidence attached to the FISA file.
The five issues all circle around the FBI/DOJ use of the Carter Page FISA application; and, more importantly, the underlying evidence that is attached to the FISA application. [source]
I. DOJ requests guidance for distribution of material due to FOIA demands. FISC gives legal opinion
II. DOJ requests guidance for distribution of material due to ongoing and anticipated civil litigation. The FISC gives legal opinion and expands to criminal litigation.
III. DOJ requests guidance for distribution of material to internal investigative units from the FBI inspectors division (INSD). FISC gives opinion and advice.
IV. DOJ requests guidance for distribution of non-minimized information, and/or, minimized information as part of the ongoing Office of Inspector General oversight. FISC gives opinion and guidance.
V. DOJ requests guidance for distribution of material to John Durham probe, both for criminal prosecution and possible evidence gathering attached to other ongoing investigative needs. FISC gives opinion and guidance.
Now, keep in mind, with hindsight we know the DOJ (Bill Barr) was essentially walking a fine line between uncovering information and trying to protect the DOJ as an institution. John Durham was never approved to investigate the government side of the Trump-Russia collusion nonsense.
At the same time, Judge Boasberg is trying to protect the FISC from their culpability and also protect the FISA Court as an institution. Everyone has an agenda here, and none of them are good.
That leads to Boasberg outlining a cautious approach toward distribution and/or sunlight on what took place. On this issue the court says allowing a target to escape prosecution is part of the penalty upon the DOJ for wrongful assembly; a nice way to cover the issue.
Judge Boasberg does not consider the DOJ is targeting the “assemblers” for their criminal conduct. Rather his response is general toward criminals who were targets of a FISA application assembled with corrupt intent. It seemed a little weird at the time, now notsomuch.
Pages #11 and #12 hit the topic of FOIA production. Boasberg says “some” FOIA requests might warrant document distribution, but not all. However, on the topic of Carter Page getting his FOIA fulfilled, the court supports expansive distribution to Mr. Page alone.
I find the arguments and issues in/around page #14 to be especially noteworthy. In this segment Judge Boasberg is responding to the underlying raw evidence that would normally be used to assemble a “woods file”. The court notes the FBI Sentinel system would contain the minimized outcomes (redacted evidence) and this points to a bigger issue.
In response to this inquiry Judge Boasberg notes FBI investigators would have access to the minimized information within the Sentinel system; however, insofar as there was additional inquiry into the raw and non-minimized intelligence, a review and distribution would be permissible so long as there was a strong filter team in place to ensure statutes surrounding FISA securities (minimization requirements) were not violated.
Overall, Judge Boasberg gives permission and approval for all six aspects Bill Barr requested. However, he does so with several legal qualifiers and distinctions which the DOJ was told to observe. Those qualifiers were intended to protect the interests of both Main Justice and the FISA Court from sunlight upon their prior conduct in 2016.
SUMMARY – Judge Boasberg has been demonstrably political in all his determinations going all the way back to his position on the FISC when the FISA application was approved. Boasberg was then moved into position to protect the FISC from the outcome of their Title-1 search warrant approval.
Boasberg then used his position as Presiding FISC judge to protect the apparatus, while using his position as DC Circuit Court Judge to diminish, obfuscate and cloud the severe ramifications from all of the DC effort, including his rulings on the Kevin Clinesmith (FBI Agent) and Ray Epps (FBI Source) cases.
Judge Boasberg sits at the epicenter of a thoroughly corrupt and compromised DC court system.
I like this approach recommended by Hokkada:
…”It’s important to remind people that the inferior courts do not work for or report to the Supreme Court. CONGRESS creates the inferior courts and as such, Congress can eliminate courts, add courts, and control funding of the courts. Congress also can impeach. And a key element of impeachment is the hearings process.
A hearings process that subpoenas Federal district court judges to testify before Congress would cast a lot of sunlight on the corrupt Judicial-Lawfare-Complex. Could the end result be impeachment? Certainly.
But it could also lead to something better in the long run: descope of the Federal court system which has grown bloated, corrupt, and arrogant because it answers to nobody.
They’re the 3rd branch of government for a reason – they are not elected by anyone, and therefore hold the least amount of power when it comes to governance. SCOTUS doesn’t even control their own budget. They can’t levy taxes. They can’t declare war. They can’t decide what constitutes citizenship.
The answer to all of this is sunlight. Simply compel Biasberg to testify in open public hearings about his role in Lawfare and his interpretation of the Federal district court’s ability to direct the actions of the Commander in Chief, issue “nationwide injunctions” and so forth. Then let’s get into his direct role in Lawfare.
Roberts wants to pretend impeachment of Biasberg is about a “political disagreement”. But it is not. This is a judicial coup d’etat we are witnessing. And the only way to stop it is to descope the judiciary and limit its ability to issue injunctions.
If crimes are discovered, such as aiding and abetting terrorist organizations, the judges should be removed. Judges can “obstruct justice” too. They are not Jesus in black robes. They are every bit as tempted by corruption – perhaps more so because they are deemed infallible by the Chief Justice – as any politician.”…
Hamilton? We are in trouble..
It could have been worse; the “judge” could have used “Urinetown” instead.
Or “Rent”…
Wasn’t Justice Jackson recently in that musical?
I wouldn’t want one of them in my fox hole.
They only enlist in the military for a free sex change operation and then apply for disability…
Are there enough Democrats willing to save their party? A return to some level of sanity would be required to save the Democrats. The judiciary just became a new political party.
There’s only one party, and they don’t represent the people.
Absolute dreamer…zero chance this would get 67 senators voting to impeach. Still, the testimony to Congress would be politically devastating to democrats and corrupt judges.
It doesn’t matter.
They didn’t convict PDJT successfully after impeachment either.
But they brought a lot of darkness to use against him in the process.
WE, can bring so much LIGHT, that, despite Communists voting against in lockstep, that Boasberg and the Judicial Derp State cannot shake it off, ever.
This We Can’t Win (TM) shoulder-shrug is why we LOSE.
Anyone consider that is why this narrative is pushed so hard?
“This We Can’t Win (TM) shoulder-shrug is why we LOSE.”
Nonsense. Nobody is shoulder-shrugging. People are simply realistic enough to see things as they are and to disengage emotionally so as to be able to think clearly about what must come next. There is no point in beating a dead horse.
The process is the punishment. Let Boasberg spend $750,000 on lawyers to represent him during his IMPEACHMENT!
Bankrupt the guy!
Biasberg has generational wealth and is 4th generation lib traitor
Not to mention the NGO money that will be funneled through for his defense.
These traitors go full metal activist knowing well in advance they got nuthin’ to lose.
Perkins Coie will probably defend him pro bono
What remedy do these district courts have if the DOJ decides not to prosecute? The commander-in-chief says this is a military readiness issue and the courts have no jurisdiction. Then DOJ concurs and determines not to pursue. What do the judges do then? Cry?
“No reasonable prosecutor”?? Like killary’s sever?
Ugh. Those words. I remember my heart about to beat put of my chest that day.
..will US Army…step in ???????and stop once and for all those judges ????
Why are 60 senate votes needed when the issue is Treason?
A one way ticket to Gitmo should do the trick. A military tribunal can sort the rest.
This comment was taken from someone at Gateway Pundit and requested that it be shared so here it is:
There is a larger policy solution to the fundamental problem posed by Activist judges. If you like this idea, please share it:
1) a new law whereby:
2) when an activist lower judge makes a ruling immediately impeding the activity of the executive branch
3) the executive branch may file a rebuttal in a different courtroom in the United States. The presiding judge over that other courtroom has the new legislated power to disagree and temporarily suspend the enforcement of the Activist judge
4) until it is brought to a court superior to both courts, at which point the superior court may decide which court’s decision takes precedent.
In this fashion, Activist judges can have their unfettered power, fettered. Use one lower-court judge, against another lower-court judge.
In this fashion, the novel extreme circumstance of the executive being hobbled can bypass the normal appellate flow and achieve more speedy resolution, while hindering the power of Activist judges.
Please share.–
The flaw is this scheme relies in CONgress to enact the law.
CONgress, being an integral part of the swamp, will never act in such defiance of the swamp.
I think that revoking ALL security clearances of ALL judges except for…maybe… the Supreme court might be helpful.
Especially geniuses Murkowski, Collins, Lankford, Barrosso, Risch, Lady Graham, Capito, Thunes, Cornyn, and a whole bunch of others whose names are so bland that you never hear from them except a day before election begging for money in a deep red safe state.
It also does not stop the Activist judge(s) from implementing other objectionable decisions.
When PDJT needs a bill to be passed, he just needs to pardon all of the republicans, including the rinos, and pardon 10 guilty dems; then the bill will likely pass.
This is supposed to be handled through an appeals process. The PROBLEM is SCOTUS is ignoring their duty to original jurisdiction. If there were to be a law passed, it would be one which would be triggered by a jurisdictional challenge by the executive. The remedy would be immediate appeal to SCOTUS regardless of any existing appeals processes, Such law would state that upon the jurisdictional challenge the ruling of the lower court would be suspended while waiting for SCOTUS decision to take up the case. If SCOTUS refuses then the lower court decision would remain suspended and no harm to the executive branch’s jurisdictional power.
The way this “process” is designed is they first establish a “stay” which leaves no room for appeal. Then they make it a temporary order of some form whether injunction or something along those lines. All of this is designed to stop the president while using the process to delay responses. SCOTUS is clearly assisting in this sabotage by saying “[impeachment] is no way to settle disagreements.” Roberts knows what it up as does everyone else.
In this episode of Julius Caesar, it is the JUDICIARY and not the Senate trying to kill POTUS with a bunch of stabs and cuts.
By directing by law that all jurisdictional challenges brought by POTUS results in suspension of lower court rulings or orders and a redirection directly to SCOTUS is the correct constitutional remedy. And if SCOTUS refuses the case, then the matter of jurisdiction is settled automatically in POTUS’s favor.
EASY and CONSTITUTIONAL.
Meanwhile SCOTUS says “oh! You can’t make us do our jobs!”
Yeah we can and we should. Don’t like it? RETIRE/RESIGN and let POTUS nominate your replacement.
If SCOTUS refuses to do its job then impound ALL funding for SCOTUS until they do do their job.
My only concern here is what happens when it is FJB mandating vaccines? I needed those judges to stop that bastard from taking my job away and forcing me out of work. So I don’t necessarily want things to automatically be decided in the executive’s favor if SCOTUS are too cowardly to act. Roberts is so faint of heart, he’d sit there and do nothing and destroy my freedoms.
That’s a constitutional challenge of the EXECUTIVE, not a jurisdictional challenge of the courts. But if the FJB lawyers were to argue lower courts jurisdiction, the constitutional challenge would still end up before SCOTUS at an accelerated pace. The point is getting SCOTUS to do their jobs if they can. And there’s exactly the same risk of their not doing their job as we know in the case of Roberts’s ruling that Obama care was a tax.
We’ve got problems. Keeping them obfuscated and hidden only makes them harder to address. Forcing them into the light at least serve a higher purpose.
The appeals process eats up multiple years until it has exhausted every step. Meanwhile the flawed ruling stands.
The need for speed and decisiveness is the entire reason a unitary Executive exists in the form of a President – who is Commander in Chief, who is responsible for National Security and foreign relations. Congress is too slow. The Courts are glacially slow.
This is why the President’s plenary powers are not reviewable by courts.
“The PROBLEM is SCOTUS is ignoring their duty to original jurisdiction.”
May I ask you to explain that, please? How does the SC have original jurisdiction in this matter?
Imagine the left in power with access to that process.
Something that can not be as easily used against us is a better direction.
No Holds Barred – Don’t worry about the mule, load the wagon. Worry and concern for the future is ok but we are in a war for survival – future means nothing if we lose. Scorched Earth on dems and judges.
To make a law of this nature abdicates the current authority and function of the Executive Branch, of the president.
Stand on the Constitution and fight these attempted usurpation, not give credence their “rulings”.
A law, as suggested, changes the Constitution without Constitutional procedures to do so.
This suggestion sounds good on the surface but the end result is getting momentum to get WTPOTUS to actually usurp the Constitution for the Destroyers of These United States of America.
No. This merely accepts the false premise that these inferior courts are on an equal footing with the Executive, but since they are creatures of the Congress rather than of the Constitution, they CAN not be on an equal footing. This is a good idea only for shooting oneself in the foot.
Only 3 Republicans voted against the confirmation of James Boasberg!
So, 47 Senate Republicans voted to confirm this Bolshevik from San Francisco with a history of leftist activism to be a federal judge.
WTF were they thinking?
Exactly. My alarms went of during 45, when McConnell was openly frustrating 45’s every effort, but was confirming Judges at breakneck speed.
How many of these judges had Heritage Foundation endorsements?
The family connections of these libtard Judges, are not that hard to uncover. How is it that the vetting process failed to uncover their leftist bent, and so how is it they got confirmed?
Easy, RINO’s in control, thats how.
One look at this guy and you knew he was a Marxist yet almost every Republican in the Senate voted for him???
At some point we all have to realize 95 percent of congress is controlled, blackmailed, paid off or communist.
Party doesn’t matter. Both sides are for themselves and not the American people.
I had high hopes and President Trump is working hard, but without arrests and the confrontations that follow, nothing will change.
Who foresaw a collection of activist lower court judges would do this?
It’s not so much what they were thinking, is that few would be thinking of THIS.
Well Soros foresaw the power in getting usurpers as State Atty Generals, so maybe him??
Lawfare seems to be the likely perp to come up with this scheme when Pres. Trump started to rain hellfire on every part of the government he had control of to stop corruption and wasteful spending like he promised.
The enemy had little else to try and maybe they found some allies within the DC gates who told them to give it a try because we have your back and let’s see if the Trump team does anything we can paint them into a corner on politically.
It’s another game of politics and we all knew the left was not going to just lie on the mat and do nothing. They figured a way to gang up on the ‘get Trump’ bandwagon again even though it was lying on its side with its wheels spinning.
Why this all is seemingly succeeding needs to be investigated and who is helping it succeed behind the curtains. If the Trump legals were not prepared for this action by the left to use lower court judges to make ridiculous rulings then that isn’t a great outcome for them. Did they think the SC would step in and do the right thing? Are they being out maneuvered again or will the actual law be followed and by whom? DOJ should play a part here I would think.
The game continues.
They were not thinking. They never think. The majority of republicans in congress are appeasers, always have been always will be.
…reaching across the aisle to get their heads handed to them!
They weren’t. Republicans aren’t smart (but they are devious).
“thinking” (in the sense of what you and I would understand the risks) is not how DC operates.
every opportunity to create tension and thus leverage for “compromise” is there meal ticket and the motivation.
it is ALWAYS THE MONEY…never forget that.
what actually happens is that both parties will throw a fit, give a fiery speech, hand out end of the world pamplets, and then when the outrage has reached about level 11… “the compromise happens”.
what is the “compromise”…and why don’t we the people, the voters pay attention to IT?
“the compromise” – for your vote, you may have this earmark in this bill or the next. records are made and notes are taken and scores are settled. If not on this bill, then the next, or the next after. There are no squabbles or disputes. Everyone gets what “They want”.
as shown above, the method of obfuscating how earmarks are actually delivered makes it very difficult for an outsider who does not have inside information of the “earmark accounting books” to determine if the bipartisan compromise was linked to this reversal of the members vote or not. However, apt pupils of simple observation …fact patterns one might say, give the compelling argument that this does in fact occur. There are no coincidences in DC. If you are a holdout, and then flip flops….you will most definitely and certainly be “rewarded” at some future point on a bill or earmark that contains a very specific budget that will enrich YOU, YOUR SPONSOR DONORS..and sometimes, and only if by accident, your actual constituent voters.
that is what they are thinking. this is HOW they think.
if Satan himself was before the house and Senate to be confirmed, they would “think” about it, argue terribly about his known history as the dark angel and a direct threat to humanity, but in the end, even Satan would blush.
It’s what they do. this is why the place attracts a certain kind of reprobate…and to those who come relatively clean, once they do a few laps in the Kool aid, the transformation is fast and certain.
God Bless America
Does anyone know how Federal District Court judge Ana Reyes, a lesbian,
became the judge assigned to hear the case challenging Trump’s ban of transgenders in the military?
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/18/judge-blocks-trumps-effort-to-ban-transgender-troops-00237699
Just another random Bolshevik judge selected by the MAGIC WHEEL in the District Clerk’s Office.
Move along….
It only has Amy Jackson Berman, and maybe 2 others on it.
I doubt there are any non-Marxists in the DC district bench.
Notice how many were not born in the USA. Notice who they worked for and where they went to law school.
https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/judges
The entire DC District court must be dis-established. Offer the judges lateral transfers elsewhere or they can resign.
Just like the partisan judge in the Dave Daleiden case brought against him by Planned Parenthood by fellow harpy former CA AG KAMALA Harris after he exposed the demonic fetal parts for profit with well-established undercover journalistic techniques (used by the liberal press like 60 minutes for decades). Judge David Orrick volunteered at abortion clinics and his wife was a zealous pro-death activist. He refused to recuse himself. He also banned the playing of the videos in the Court. At least through a plea deal 2 months ago, Daleiden did not have to admit wrongdoing and got no jail time or probation after facing a dozen felony charges that were cooked up. Then stupid CA AG Bonda said that Daleiden was “CONVICTED” when he was not. In the civil case he lost and lost his appeal and has to pay the Planned Parenthood scumbags $2,000,000.
Prior to surgery, they are mentally unfit for duty. Post surgery, they are both mentally unfit and physically unfit in the case of M2F. In the case of F2M it’s mostly mentally unfit but has lesser medical complications though they still exist.
This is why people with something as common as asthma are not qualified to serve. If on deployment and necessary medications are no available, the consequences are dire.
These people are insane to think as they do.
Congress created these courts so do your job congress and dismantle ’em. TODAY.
And that’s the thing, if Congress can create these courts (which they have) they can also LEGISLATE against them.
My proposal is simple: Any POTUS challenge of jurisdiction of the lower courts result in (1) suspension of any ruling or order by the lower court and (2) immediate redirect to SCOTUS as original jurisdiction. (3) If SCOTUS refuses to take the case, then the jurisdictional challenge defaults to being settled and lower court ruling or order remains suspended.
Simple and easy law.
I see where the Trump admin is “up one”; the new head of USAID is a Doge guy,…lol.
Circumvents a Court order, apperently.
Picaune and childish is whatvthis is becoming.
The narrative gives itself away.
The Judges continue, more and more outrageous, knowing they will be overturned, in hopes PDJT will eventually “openly defy” them.
This will then be used as grounds for Impeachment.
Even if the House flips, and votes to impeach, the Senate will not convict….making it all an excercise in narrative engineering, and a waste of time.
The process showers a Lot of sunlight on the POS and cripples him in his role going forward.
3/19/2025 – Motion To Stay The March 18 Minute Order
“micromanaged and unnecessary judicial fishing expeditions”
“the court’s actions to date represent grave usurpations of the President’s powers”
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.278436/gov.uscourts.dcd.278436.37.0_2.pdf
—
3/19/2025 – Order
Mere hours before their filing deadline and characterizing the Court’s proceedings as “a
picayune dispute over the micromanagement of immaterial factfinding,” Defendants seek to stay
the Court’s Order requiring them to produce in camera particular information.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.278436/gov.uscourts.dcd.278436.38.0_1.pdf
“Mere hours” – What an obnoxious prick. They had less than a day to respond.
Oops, sorry court, the stuff requested is classified military data above your security clearance.
This whole court situation gives me Brazilian vibes. Too close for comfort
We now know much of the US funding was nothing more than fraud and money laundering so this would seem like easy pickings for Pam & Kash to prove the corruption and stealing of American taxpayer monies.
The great thing about opening this as a national security investigation is no judge can interfere due to the National Security designation and the better part of this is there seems to be a high probability if they follow the money it could possibly lead to a few judges or their family members.
My bet is the money trail could very well encircle a few hundred if not a thousand DC thieves.
Ken Paxton would have already opened up this investigation by now is my bet.
Pam is a HUGE disappointment so far.
She doesn’t strike me as a warrior. We need a warrior.
T&A show, might be a distraction for the T&A crowd. On both sides.
I think we’ve all said the AG had to be a pitbull. Instead we got a primping poodle. I just don’t understand. Oh, ye, it’s only March (April, May, June…)
Sure, I could be wrong.
Here is Section 23 of the Alien Enemies Act which sets forth just what judges can do relevant to dealing with Alien Enemies that are brought into the courtroom:
“After any such proclamation has been made, the several courts of the United States, having criminal jurisdiction, and the several justices and judges of the courts of the United States, are authorized and it shall be their duty, upon complaint against any alien enemy resident and at large within such jurisdiction or district, to the danger of the public peace or safety, and contrary to the tenor or intent of such proclamation, or other regulations which the President may have established, to cause such alien to be duly apprehended and conveyed before such court, judge, or justice; and after a full examination and hearing on such complaint, and sufficient cause appearing, to order such alien to be removed out of the territory of the United States, or to give sureties for his good behavior, or to be otherwise restrained, conformably to the proclamation or regulations established as aforesaid, and to imprison, or otherwise secure such alien, until the order which may be so made shall be performed.”
The emphasized section of Section 23 describes just what a Judge like Boasberg is required to do when there is a report of an Alien Enemy in that court’s jurisdiction–The judge has to see to it the alien is apprehended in accord with the President’s Proclamation invoking the statute. The judge is then required to review the alien’s status with the parameters set forth in the President’s proclamation and any regulations which the President has included in the President’s directive for handling any alleged Alien Enemy.
The judges do not make “guardrails” to control the President. The President makes the guardrails to control the judges’ responses to reports about Alien Enemies in within their jurisdiction. If the Alien is found to be an Alien Enemy, the judge is required to order the Alien’s expulsion from the United States as set forth by the President’s proclamation and/or supporting regulations.
The judges need to take time to READ THE STATUTES before taking any action.
And there we have it..
Ohhhh, so Bozoberg was just upset he didn’t get to be the one to kick the terrorist gangers out 🙄
Sundance, I believe it’s also very important to recognize that the subtext to all this is to eliminate the 1A. It’s very clear if one analyzes the issues and players and ideas involved.
Thank you Sundance. Now I need to go throw up. Beyond appalling 1) that this actually took place at the highest levels in our government, and 2) they all walked away as if it was just another day.
God will have the last word.
Speaker Johnson and Majority leader Thunes silence on this matter is DEAFENING.
ALL of the appearance of working WITH President Trump, to get his nominations confirmed, and pass the CR he wanted, mean nothing if they sit on their hands, during this Judicial assault on President Trump.
and they will, continue to sit on their hands…
From Boasberg’s order “the Court seeks this information, not as a ‘micromanaged and unnecessary judicial fishing expedition’ but to determine if the Government deliberately flouted its Orders”
I knew it – “[Boasberg] is attempting is to calculate the location of the plane at the time of his bogus order, and if that plane was not over international waters at that time to then hold the president in contempt of court.” – (https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/03/18/president-trump-goes-scorched-earth-on-judge-boasberg-chief-justice-john-roberts-defends-boasberg/comment-page-2/#comment-11655308)
Boasberg’s intent is crystal clear.
President Trump can pardon anybody involved if the judge tries contempt crap!
For those that have mysteriously begun posting here the musings of Sundance’s most notorious always wrong ankle-biter on the Twit:
Relentlessly wrong, never dissuaded, pretty damned Derpy, n’est-ce pas?
So, Judge Boasberg appointed McCord the DOJ Official clearly most responsible for FISA abuse to actually police FISA abuse?
I’m trying to wrap my head around that one!
ANOTHER EXAMPLE – FAUCI married To THE AGENCY ETHICS CHECKER and Is COVERED By His Daughter Running ” fact checking ” .
CAN’T MAKE SOMETHINGS UP !
Almost like he’s paid to be an a-holio?
Robert Barnes also has to straightened out Shipwrecked Crew on a regular basis.
He’s quite the disreputable yet endlessly self-promoting individual.
I couldn’t believe it when I saw people posting his Twits here starting a couple months ago.
Dude just can’t quit Sundance, had to follow him to the Treehouse apparently. Ugh.
John Eastman fighting LAWFARE in California…
No LA Fire $$$ from President Trump unless California Bar ends it’s war on John Eastman! It’s a guaranteed easy fix to end the California Bar’s lawfare on Mr. Eastman!
https://rumble.com/v6qw3y2-live-john-eastman-hearing.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
And, on top of not knowing, or not caring, about when he is supposed to recuse himself, Boasberg has not read the responsibilities of a DISTRICT JUDGE according to Section 23 of the Alien Enemies Act.
https://x.com/Farrier105/status/1902475088345329998
You think he cares? I’m guessing he read it but did what he did anyway since no one seems to want to call him out on any of his garbage rulings and he thinks he’s the end all and be all of running the show aka the country over the executive branch. Time to confront this guy with a good bit of real law. He needs to be knocked down off his high horse.
Who will do it?
DeSantis suggests Congress strip federal courts of jurisdiction | Fox News
Congress has the authority to strip jurisdiction of the federal courts to decide these cases in the first place. The sabotaging of President Trump’s agenda by ‘resistance’ judges was predictable — why no jurisdiction-stripping bills tee’d up at the onset of this Congress?” DeSantis wrote in a Wednesday post on X.
When someone responded by asking how such a move could pass when 60 votes would be needed to push it through the Senate, DeSantis replied, “Attach it to a ‘must pass’ bill…”
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/desantis-proposes-solution-trumps-agenda-stymied-judges
It’s easier than that. Harry Reid gave us all a gift many years ago. It’s called “the nuclear option”. Simply waive Senate rules to prevent a filibuster. It’s been used before on judges, never on legislation. But perhaps useful for legislation impacting the size, scope, and jurisdiction of the Federal district and appellate courts.
ron! says something useful! I’ll take it!
Exactly! .
Be careful. Might find him in a pair of heals. Makes him appear taller. lol
Remember the only time Chuck Schumer wasn’t lying…… “these people can get you six-ways to Sunday”. At his age, he knows where a lot of political bodies are buried.
Anyway, Trump has already said clearly he isn’t defying a federal judge, so that’s gone. Forget about impeachment. That’s scripted political theater with no chance of concluding successfully. I also wouldn’t count on the supreme court given how things appear to be going. Barrett is 100% under Robert’s thumb when it matters. Maybe she or her husband have personal “pressure-points” to worry about? She was a deep-state groomed plant in my view. She could care less about the constitution.
No idea how Trumps gets through this as it will only get worse as these federal judges ban together and become even more hostile toward Team Trump. At the very least they will burn precious time and resources, but it’s likely gonna be worse than that.
Great click-bait out there on all these conservative websites from all the chirping chickens, but click-bait fixes nothing. Trump better get Bondi some A-team help. This is way over her head.
I’m sure Sundance gets tired of telling the story of these corrupt actors; I get tired of reading it. My blood pressure goes up every time I realize again that they all deserve to be in prison, and for a long time, but they never will be.
It’s the absolute lack of justice in a country famed for its justice system that is so demoralizing.
If this information about Boasberg were presented regularly on the lamestream media it would make a difference. People hate them but they still have some influence.
I just have this feeling that if Matt Gaetz were AG things would really be rocking and rolling . Not sure what exactly but it would be a hell of a lot better than Bondi for sure.
Respectfuly disagree.
Matt is a bomb thrower, and a lightening rod.
He was an impediment to getting the MAGA agenda support from the House, and so had to go.
He would never have been confirmed, and PDJT KNEW he wouldn’t, before he nominated him.
So, why did he nominate him? To get him out of the House, thats why.
Gaetz is good for loud talking and bluster but he would probably not have the real legal intellect to handle this kind of deep state lawfare maneuvering. He would most likely make it all public quite well though.
Doesn’t it seem very strange that he was on top of the mountain one day and then he fell over the cliff and is barely being heard from now? Something very amiss with Matt Gaetz and it was handled quickly.
Can’t call it a democracy when some dime-a-dozen gavel jockey can snatch the whole shebang right outta the top dog’s hands.
Constitutional Republic. Right now it is being run like a democracy, two wolfs and a sheep are deciding what is for dinner.
If Peg Bundy was being proactive…….or even slightly creative…..Boasberg wants America to give terrorists a home here, with us.
Boasberg is violating 18 U.S. Code 23398. Giving material support to a known terrorist organization.
(a)Prohibited Activities.—(1)Unlawful conduct.—
Whoever knowingly provides material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization, or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, and, if the death of any person results, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life. To violate this paragraph, a person must have knowledge that the organization is a designated terrorist organization (as defined in subsection (g)(6)), that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorist activity (as defined in section 212(a)(3)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act), or that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorism (as defined in section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989).
One of President Trump’s billionaire buddies should rent a house on Boasberg’s block and stock it with illegal immigrants on Section 8.
That would fix things up pretty quickly!
ACB has said that protests by democrats in front of her home terrifies her. Can’t remember where I read it but it’s no secret . Roberts has said that riots in the streets based on how they rule does make them think differently with other USSC Judges saying Roberts refusal to look into the 2020 election theft was based on potential riots.
That’s a huge problem.
Works for the Mafia, works for the communists, so proof in the pudding.
The problem is the sheep bleating, “Constitutional Republic! Constitutional Republic!” like magic chants.
Great point. It’s an invasion. Giving Aide and Comfort to the Enemy.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artIII-S3-C1-4/ALDE_00013527/
Y’all need to spell my name right or we can’t be friends anymore. 😉
Thanks for the shout-out. Nice to feel heard.
Is that a stock photo avatar or is that you making powder turns? If so what kinda deck do you ride?
That’s all me. In that shot I was riding a Neversummer Cobra all mountain board, Burton Genesis bindings. K2 boots. My son took the photo and I gifted him the Cobra. Copper Mountain, CO.
Today I ride a NS Proto Type 2 on groomer days, and a Korua Dart with Union Atlas bindings for pow days.
We switched boards over Christmas, and man I’ll tell you what, that Cobra still rides like a dream.
You?
Sorry if I mis-spellef your name, and welcome to the club.
lol no worries, I was just being sassy.
I enjoy your commentary and occasional back and forth.
well done. I regret not mentioning my praise for your work. please take this as my sincere apology.
God Bless America
Elon Musk Says DOGE Discovered 14 ‘Magic Money Computers Which Can Just Make Money Out of Thin Air’
by Jim Hᴏft Mar. 19, 2025 5:00 pm
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/elon-musk-says-doge-discovered-14-magic-money/
According to Musk, 14 such machines have been uncovered across various agencies, mostly at the Treasury Department, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Department of Defense (DOD), and even the State Department.
Musk’s revelations suggest that federal spending is even more chaotic and reckless than the public realizes. With multiple “magic money computers” operating independently, government agencies are issuing massive payments that don’t add up to the numbers being reported to Congress or the American people.
Now you know why the activist judges want to stop Trump and Musk, because they are about to be exposed.
Something this big and Elon tells it to Ted Cruz first?
Laura Loomer
@LauraLoomer..
and gets 75% of their funding from Federal Government…
In the video below, Emily Galvin-Almanza
@GalvinAlmanza
, the founder of “Partners for Justice”
@PFJ_USA talks about how “The creation of gang laws lets prosecutors subject black and brown people to a completely different set of rules in court.”
In the video, she provides a defense of gang members and minimizes shoplifting as a crime. She says it’s racist to have laws that crack down on gangs like Tren de Aragua, because 99% of people in jail for gang activity are black and or Hispanic.
This week, she also posted a tweet about Judge Boasberg blocking
@realDonaldTrump
deportations of Venezuelan gang bangers, and she attacked President Trump’s Border Czar
@RealTomHoman
in another tweet this week.
The woman in the video below is the same woman who employs the Judge’s daughter. Notice, the video was published on the official page for “Partners for Justice”, the organization that Judge Boasberg’s daughter Katherine Boasberg works for as a “Capacity Building Associate”.
Check out her use of the hashtags #gangs #defenseattorney #criminaljustice #reform #publicdefender.
Of course Judge Boasberg wants to oppose President Trump’s deportation of criminal illegal aliens and terrorist gang bangers from Venezuela.
His daughter’s own employment depends on there being a constant flow of criminal, illegal alien gang bangers in our country!
CONFLICT OF INTEREST!
DOGE NEEDS TO CUT $$$ FUNDING!
https://x.com/lauraloomer/status/1901837776565280919
You know what “capacity building” is?
Color revolution prep.
@amuse on X:
“LAWFARE: The wife of Obama Judge Boasberg blocking Trump’s deportation of illegal criminal aliens is the founder of an abortion NGO funded by USAID and Soros.
LAWFARE: The wife of Obama judge blocking Trump’s deportation of illegal criminal aliens is the founder of an abortion NGO funded, indirectly, by USAID and Soros.
Pictured below, Elizabeth “Liddy” Manson (Boasberg) giving Douglas Emhoff and Secretary Xavier Becerra a tour of her abortion clinic.
https://x.com/amuse/status/1901992280128356697
Manson? No relation I’m sure/$
Clinesmith also had his DC law license restored and is now a member in good standing of the bar.
He’s got so much drama going on at the same time, I’m shocked he can keep up. At the same time, these are “small” issues compared to the elephant in the room.
Any country with a president that is a primary party to genocide and crimes against humanity is doomed to fail. Sooner is far better than later. I hope this piece-of-garbage gets what he so richly deserves.
I wonder if PDJT can declare a state of Emergency and overide these judges, or does a state of emergency exist already since 911 that is renewed regularly?
When policemen are involved in a shooting, they are generally assigned to a desk until all the facts are known. It would not hurt a bit to assign these Justices, Judges, Prosecutors, Attorneys, and other compromised players to NPC roles until Congress has reviewed their conduct. It seems reasonable to me to temporarily suspend their Security Clearances at the same time.
Clinesmith has a striking resemblance to a certain former transportation secretary, Pete Buttigieg. has anyone ever seen these two in the same room at the same time?
This man is not honesty judge he is a liberal political,
You are absolutely right, Kathy!🫡
The JFK files just as people are disgusted with the Deep State fighting Trump.
They’re takin’ a run at Trump ‘cause he’s the first mug in ages to lay down the real law and put the house in order. These phony injunctions? Just the pinko racket to keep the folks from gettin’ the brass-knuckle shake-up they signed up for.
2/3rds vote needed in the Senate –to remove Boasburg.
‘Wonder how many times we will need to impeach him,
before we reach the 2/3rds threshold??
Boasberg can not serve on FISC if his security clearance is revoked
I think it is an elegant solution.
Eliminate Washington D.C.
Call it the Village of Washington
There is already enough village idiots there so it seems appropriate
IF, one assumes the “Epstein files” hold damming provable evidence that would de-throne chief Justice Roberts, why would DJT not use this?
Then there is the question, would the Epstein File be released in their total capacity, un-redacted?
Then what are the implications?
Who else would go down?
Who is brave enough to open a can of worms that may potentially destroy any faith in the current Governing System of the US?
There are very few on this Earth that would chose to do so. In John II there is a little quote, paraphrased, “he that chooses Eternal Life over one’s personal life, shall never know death”. But the kicker is, one has to let go of one’s personal ego and Know that “this is Gods Life, Alone”.
Is mankind ready for such an upheaval?
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
-Lavrentiy Beria, Stalin’s secret police chief
Since Leftists love Marxism so much, I see nothing wrong with applying it’s strategies to them.
It’s a near certainty that Roberts, Boasberg and most of the rest of these leftist judges are compromised, either blackmailed or bribed. What’s needed is to ferret out their corruption and either indict them or if statute of limitations are passed, expose all the dirt on them to destroy credibility and pressure them to resign.
As large as the DOJ and IC are, I would hope there are enough non-enemy agents to assemble a modest sized team as a “judge investigation squad” with clearances to look into everything about these people, in the interest of “national security” as well as government integrity.
Everything they’ve ever done wrong can and should be used against them. After all, they deserve it.
Sundance gets some coverage in this Revolver article although they miss the point about the goal of the impeachment process (or least what I understand it to be).
https://revolver.news/2025/03/the-world-is-noticing-theres-a-legit-coup-underway-in-the-us-led-by-federal-judges/
I just checked the judge’s biography on the DC District Court Web site. Boasberg first made the federal bench in 2011–He’s an OBAMA JUDGE, so what’s with Shipley claiming he was a Bush judge?
And he was running the FISA Court as early as 2014, two years before Trump was elected. He was on the FISA Court from 2014 until he was made the Chief FISA Judge in 2020 by Roberts. He was always an Obama judge.
He was appointed by GW Bush September 2002, as Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia; that is where Shipley is getting his info from; See Wikipedia…
Sheesh. The House doesn’t have the votes to Impeach anyone, much less this Boasberg clown act. If the Demcommies already know the whole story, I am sure they have been working on how to rig the Courts to protect him. Justice Roberts is the one who needs to be impeached and right now. Only one problem, how do we make that happen? We have here a Constitutional crisis and the enemy have been working for 10 years on how to make it happen. We better know exactly what we are doing before we go after Justice Roberts. Who do we have who can convince the Court to remove one of its members and do any of its members even have a legal way to do that? Trump and his legal experts had better prevail on this!
With 883 federal judges across the fruited plain, we don’t seem to need a president at all.
Miranda Devine: Trump is fighting a cartel of vile, corrupt and far-left judges trying to kill his campaign promises
https://nypost.com/2025/03/19/opinion/trump-fighting-cartel-of-far-left-judges-trying-to-kill-campaign-promises/
The Judicial Coup of activist District Court Judges must stop.
Congress must pass legislation to restrict the jurisdiction
of District Court Judges. Congress has the authority to
limit the District Court jurisdiction over certain type
of cases.
Do you really think there is enough courage in the Repug Party to stand up to what has obviously been financed by the Globalist Cabal of Communists. Only Trump can do it and he has a lot of catching up to do. We have a serious problem, no? Only by removing Justice Roberts can the Globalists be pushed out of our Judicial Branch. I don’t think there is any prescribed way to do this. But, now we know why George W Bush selected Roberts to be our Chief Justice and how could that have even been legally done?
Boasberg looks too much like Nosferatu to be regarded as a normal human.
#EvilIncarnate
Recent reports have raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest involving Chief Judge James E. Boasberg of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. These concerns stem from the professional activities of his family members in relation to his judicial decisions.  
Judge Boasberg’s Recent Ruling:
Judge Boasberg recently issued an order halting the deportation of individuals identified as members of the Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua, known for involvement in human trafficking, drug smuggling, and violent crimes. This decision has sparked debate, particularly in light of his family’s affiliations.
Family Connections:
• Daughter – Katharine Boasberg: Katharine is employed by Partners for Justice (PFJ), a nonprofit organization that provides legal support to individuals facing criminal charges, including undocumented immigrants. PFJ actively opposes mass incarceration and certain deportation practices. According to reports, Katharine’s role involves assisting public defender offices nationwide.  
• Wife – Elizabeth “Liddy” Manson: Elizabeth Manson is reported to be the founder of an abortion-focused nonprofit organization that has received indirect funding from USAID and entities associated with George Soros. Additionally, she has donated over $11,000 to Democratic candidates, including $3,000 to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign. 
Ethical Considerations:
The Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges mandates that judges recuse themselves from cases where their impartiality might reasonably be questioned, especially if a family member’s interests could be substantially affected by the proceedings. In this context, Judge Boasberg’s decision to halt the deportations, given his daughter’s involvement with PFJ, has raised ethical questions. Notably, investigative journalist Laura Loomer reported that following the exposure of these connections, Katharine Boasberg deleted her social media profiles.  
Conclusion:
While the professional endeavors of Judge Boasberg’s family members are legal and within their rights, the overlap between their activities and his judicial rulings has led to perceptions of a potential conflict of interest. This situation underscores the importance of transparency and adherence to ethical guidelines to maintain public trust in the judiciary.
Boasberg is a “dishonest judge”…..he presided over a case I had with George Washington University and ruled against me. He had a salaried relationship and taught at the university and did not recuse himself and did not properly notify us of this relationship when he took the case.
One wonders how Judge Boasberg can look at himself in the mirror with any sense of self-respect. His parents forgot to give him a moral compass.