When you understand how Washington DC Judges view their role and responsibility, then you understand the scale of opposition that President Trump is facing. The false media framework of our “government” only makes the issues worse. So, here’s an explanation of Boasberg v Trump.
In 2016 the DOJ-NSD headed by Mary McCord filed a FISA application seeking a Title-1 search (full and unlimited) surveillance warrant against the leading presidential candidate, Donald Trump. The method to gain the surveillance authority was to use CIA informant Carter Page who had met with the Trump campaign and call Page an “agent of a foreign power.”
The FISA Court knowingly and with specific intent approved the Title-1 surveillance warrant which was filed using false evidence (Clinesmith) and sketchy supporting documents (Steele Dossier), no Woods File was attached.
At the time of the application, Mary McCord was acting head of the DOJ National Security Division. McCord was responsible for filing the warrant application. The DOJ-NSD had no inspector general oversight. The targeting of candidate Donald Trump was entirely for political purposes and intents.
After President Trump won the 2016 election, he gave DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz authority to conduct oversight over the DOJ-NSD. IG Horowitz started investigating the FISA application. This is where things get interesting.
The FISA Court (FISC) was exposed by their willful blindness in allowing the Title-1 targeting of Donald Trump.
Justice John Roberts is in charge of the FISC.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts then appointed Judge James Boasberg to the position of presiding judge over the FISA Court (FISC).
Judge Boasberg then selected Mary McCord to be an amicus or advisor to the court as Horowitz was investigating the fraudulent FISA application.
Boasberg put the person who was in charge of submitting the false FISA application in a position to filter the results of the Horowitz investigation of that same FISA application.
In essence, think of this as protecting the Judicial Branch. Justice Roberts appointed Boasberg to defend the FISC from scrutiny. Boasberg then moves Mary McCord into position to defend the FISC from scrutiny (McCord also protects herself).
At the time, Mary McCord’s husband Sheldon Snook was working within Justice Robert’s office.
That’s how John Roberts, James Boasberg and Mary McCord all connect. All the motives and intents go back to that original Title-1 FISA application.
Remember, this was a huge scandal all by itself. The FISA Court permitted a full-throated surveillance warrant against the leading presidential candidate, Donald Trump. The Judicial Branch was intentionally influencing the 2016 election. These are not stupid people; they were not duped, conned or fooled, they knew exactly what they were doing.
After appointing Mary McCord to take up a defensive position for herself and the FISA Court (cover), Judge Boasberg then becomes the presiding judge in the case against the FBI agent who falsified the FISA application, Kevin Clinesmith. Boasberg gives Clinesmith a slap on the wrist and a few months’ probation (more cover).
This is the same Judge Boasberg gave J6 FBI agent provocateur Ray Epps a sentence of probation. This is the same judge who, on his vacation, went to sit in the DC courtroom to observe defendant President Trump who was forced to appear in DC court. This is the same Boasberg who established a horrible precedent by forcing Vice-President Mike Pence to testify before a DC grand jury about his conversations with President Trump (breaking executive privilege).
♦ Now we go back to the John Durham investigation, because Bill Barr had to ask Presiding Judge Boasberg for guidance and direction as the Durham team looked at the FISA application (Title-1 surveillance warrant) against the backdrop of the Obama government targeting Donald Trump.
This is June of 2020, Bill Barr (who was running another cover-up angle) asked Judge Boasberg for guidance on five very specific issues centering around the Carter Page FISA application. Barr asked for legal guidance to assist John Durham in disclosing information in the FISA file & evidence attached to the FISA file.
The five issues all circle around the FBI/DOJ use of the Carter Page FISA application; and, more importantly, the underlying evidence that is attached to the FISA application. [source]
I. DOJ requests guidance for distribution of material due to FOIA demands. FISC gives legal opinion
II. DOJ requests guidance for distribution of material due to ongoing and anticipated civil litigation. The FISC gives legal opinion and expands to criminal litigation.
III. DOJ requests guidance for distribution of material to internal investigative units from the FBI inspectors division (INSD). FISC gives opinion and advice.
IV. DOJ requests guidance for distribution of non-minimized information, and/or, minimized information as part of the ongoing Office of Inspector General oversight. FISC gives opinion and guidance.
V. DOJ requests guidance for distribution of material to John Durham probe, both for criminal prosecution and possible evidence gathering attached to other ongoing investigative needs. FISC gives opinion and guidance.
Now, keep in mind, with hindsight we know the DOJ (Bill Barr) was essentially walking a fine line between uncovering information and trying to protect the DOJ as an institution. John Durham was never approved to investigate the government side of the Trump-Russia collusion nonsense.
At the same time, Judge Boasberg is trying to protect the FISC from their culpability and also protect the FISA Court as an institution. Everyone has an agenda here, and none of them are good.
That leads to Boasberg outlining a cautious approach toward distribution and/or sunlight on what took place. On this issue the court says allowing a target to escape prosecution is part of the penalty upon the DOJ for wrongful assembly; a nice way to cover the issue.
Judge Boasberg does not consider the DOJ is targeting the “assemblers” for their criminal conduct. Rather his response is general toward criminals who were targets of a FISA application assembled with corrupt intent. It seemed a little weird at the time, now notsomuch.
Pages #11 and #12 hit the topic of FOIA production. Boasberg says “some” FOIA requests might warrant document distribution, but not all. However, on the topic of Carter Page getting his FOIA fulfilled, the court supports expansive distribution to Mr. Page alone.
I find the arguments and issues in/around page #14 to be especially noteworthy. In this segment Judge Boasberg is responding to the underlying raw evidence that would normally be used to assemble a “woods file”. The court notes the FBI Sentinel system would contain the minimized outcomes (redacted evidence) and this points to a bigger issue.
In response to this inquiry Judge Boasberg notes FBI investigators would have access to the minimized information within the Sentinel system; however, insofar as there was additional inquiry into the raw and non-minimized intelligence, a review and distribution would be permissible so long as there was a strong filter team in place to ensure statutes surrounding FISA securities (minimization requirements) were not violated.
Overall, Judge Boasberg gives permission and approval for all six aspects Bill Barr requested. However, he does so with several legal qualifiers and distinctions which the DOJ was told to observe. Those qualifiers were intended to protect the interests of both Main Justice and the FISA Court from sunlight upon their prior conduct in 2016.
SUMMARY – Judge Boasberg has been demonstrably political in all his determinations going all the way back to his position on the FISC when the FISA application was approved. Boasberg was then moved into position to protect the FISC from the outcome of their Title-1 search warrant approval.
Boasberg then used his position as Presiding FISC judge to protect the apparatus, while using his position as DC Circuit Court Judge to diminish, obfuscate and cloud the severe ramifications from all of the DC effort, including his rulings on the Kevin Clinesmith (FBI Agent) and Ray Epps (FBI Source) cases.
Judge Boasberg sits at the epicenter of a thoroughly corrupt and compromised DC court system.
I like this approach recommended by Hokkada:
…”It’s important to remind people that the inferior courts do not work for or report to the Supreme Court. CONGRESS creates the inferior courts and as such, Congress can eliminate courts, add courts, and control funding of the courts. Congress also can impeach. And a key element of impeachment is the hearings process.
A hearings process that subpoenas Federal district court judges to testify before Congress would cast a lot of sunlight on the corrupt Judicial-Lawfare-Complex. Could the end result be impeachment? Certainly.
But it could also lead to something better in the long run: descope of the Federal court system which has grown bloated, corrupt, and arrogant because it answers to nobody.
They’re the 3rd branch of government for a reason – they are not elected by anyone, and therefore hold the least amount of power when it comes to governance. SCOTUS doesn’t even control their own budget. They can’t levy taxes. They can’t declare war. They can’t decide what constitutes citizenship.
The answer to all of this is sunlight. Simply compel Biasberg to testify in open public hearings about his role in Lawfare and his interpretation of the Federal district court’s ability to direct the actions of the Commander in Chief, issue “nationwide injunctions” and so forth. Then let’s get into his direct role in Lawfare.
Roberts wants to pretend impeachment of Biasberg is about a “political disagreement”. But it is not. This is a judicial coup d’etat we are witnessing. And the only way to stop it is to descope the judiciary and limit its ability to issue injunctions.
If crimes are discovered, such as aiding and abetting terrorist organizations, the judges should be removed. Judges can “obstruct justice” too. They are not Jesus in black robes. They are every bit as tempted by corruption – perhaps more so because they are deemed infallible by the Chief Justice – as any politician.”…
Hi FBI. Are you reading this and detect a conspiracy of some in the federal judiciary ignoring their own ethical conflicts of interest, and committing lawfare against the President of the United States even after he won the election? You see evidence of collusion, setting traps for Trump officials for contempt? Or am I just missing something? FBI you reading this? Congress? Anyone who can rein in these criminal judges? Forget SCOTUS, they are too politicized, i.e. afraid.
It’s called selective memory
It’s called “selective Law Enforcement”. That is this Republics biggest downfall I can see.,
<FBI you reading this? Congress? Anyone…>
Bueller? 🙂
The ones that should be reigning it in is the GOP but sadly most of them are corrupt as well. #DCCrimeCartel
Good call.
RICO charges. Seditious Conspiracy. Defund thru Congress. Dismantle the District Court network beginning with the dissolution of the DC Circuit.
I haven’t heard Boasberg comment on his potential conflict of interest issue based on what Loomer posted on the family member.
At what point does Pam announce a national security investigation and anyone, judge included who interferes with this investigation will be arrested and prosecuted for obstruction of justice?
Wait a long time probably, unless Trump puts a fire under her feet by threatening to let past misdeeds , as Sundance laid out, get more widely exposed
AG Bondi cannot initiate an investigation.
However, Director Noem of HHS and Director Gabbart can refer these Judges to the AG for national security issues.
Also, if they were so generously inclined; the House and Senate INTEL and Judicial Committees could refer the Judges as well.
My guess is because the spineless electeds would have a hissy fit.
The Republican Controlled NEUTRAL (Cowardly) Congress actually has courses of action they CAN take to support the President in his battles vs the lawfare assault by democrat Judges.
One of the major easy actions would be … Convert President Trump’s Executive Orders into Legislated Law, which is a major option and step in the life cycle of a Presidential Executive Order. This de-fangs the illegal and part of the over reach arguments used by the democrats.
Other easy to do and within the prerogative of the Legislative Branch … Bring suits vs the Judges for over reach before, the Supreme Court as well as file amicus briefs in support of the President.
Also, if they were so generously inclined: the House and Senate Judicial and INTEL committees could refer them to US AG for obstruction as well as INTEL violation issues.
Easy to do but childish and possibly damaging in other ways with respect to supporting other case … limits to funding.
Hard to do actions and possible:
Actual impeachments … even if the senate does not convict, worth the effort to go on the record as well as dig to dig up evidence the AG could use.
Close down or reduce the size of District Courts.
This right here, all day. Convert the executive orders into law at both a state and federal level. Each one of you can work to codify these orders in your respective states and pressure your federal representation to do so as well. You can’t depend on one person, or just the executive branch to make these necessary changes to ensure the safety and security of the citizenry. The time is now to push the Overton window to the right and get this legislation passed. That way, it is not dependent on an executive branch that changes every four years to do it. By codifying it into law permanently, it will also eliminate the drama surrounding the executive branch and demonstrate that it is the will of the people at the ballot box. By doing it via exec order, while helpful, it’s also creating a lot of unnecessary drama that diminshes the energy and will of the people to pass meaningful legislation. You elected the executive branch and majority congress that you wanted. Now demand that they represent the will of the people via legislation
Trump has had more than half of all national injunctions levied against him that have been made in the entire history of the US.
JUDICIAL COUP: Rogan O’Handley On “Marxists In Black Robes Deeming Themselves President” (10:06)
Bannon’s War Room
19 Mar 2025
https://rumble.com/v6qvuss-judicial-coup-rogan-ohandley-on-marxists-in-black-robes-deeming-themselves-.html
ALL by “randomly selected” democrat Judges.
Hat Tip to Hokkada!!
Tremendous post & absolutely brilliant monicker!! Biasberg. Damn, I wish I’d have thought of it.
Where the Sam Hill is Congress? Ain’t it time to get dirty & start helping out PJDT here?
MTG
Sen Kruz- Or are you all talk & -0- action??
Jim Jordan
C’mon People, time to actually earn your damned salaries here!!
Start hauling these black-robed arses into hearings & really lay into ’em.
And to PJDT, let’s not be afraid to sick the Doge boys on ’em too!!
RIGHT NOW!!!
“The Judicial Branch was intentionally influencing the 2016 election. These are not stupid people; they were not duped, conned or fooled, they knew exactly what they were doing.”
And they knew exactly what they were doing when they refused to give ‘standing’ or fair hearing to the flood of 2020 election fraud cases or the wave of lawfare directed at J6 protestors, President Trump, and his top acolytes afterward. Judge Chutkan rejoins the party of rope dancing Lilliputians restricting Gulliver’s power.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/breaking-corrupt-obama-judge-chutkan-temporarily-blocks-lee/
Absolutely! 🔥🔥🔥🔥
And so the two judges obstructing President Trump are not even-handed arbiters of justice but actually co-defendants, so-conspirators in a seditious plot to deprive both President Trump and the American public of their civil rights.
Roberts has failed to oversee the district court system and the FISA Court. His loyalty is to the agency that installed him. He’s got to go.
America has political criminals like Obama, Hillary and FJB, etc., judicial criminals like Boasberg, Howell, Sullivan, etc. and lets no forget the Congressional criminals like Pelosi, Schiff, Schumer, McConnel and Omar etc. We can either accept them or GET RID OF THEM – let’s vote for getting rid of them by any means necessary.
Justice Roberts says President Trump Administration is “targeting” Judges and trying to remove them by impeachment procedures. This is RICH because the Leftist Activist Judges have spent the last four years targeting Trump. POT MEET SKILLET! Evidently, Roberts and most Democrats are in the same boat. They think MAGA voters and some Democrat (who have finally woke up from the stupid stupor) cannot think for themselves.
The FISA Court turned down the first FBI application in the summer of 2016. The first warrant on Carter Page was approved in October 2016.
Trump rode down the golden escalator of Trump Tower on June 16, 2015. This initiated the institutional ire of DC, trillions being at stake. This has been ten years in the making.
“…and strode down along the pinnacles of Olympos, angered in his heart, carrying across his shoulders the bow and the hooded quiver.”
Homer, Iliad 1. 43 ff
Roberts and Boasberg are nothing but political crooks.
They have destroyed America’s judicial system.
Very sad.
This is all we need to know: Judge Boasberg sits at the epicenter of a thoroughly corrupt and compromised DC court system.
We need to know how to eliminate it.
Congress can eliminate the DC Circuit without impeaching anyone. Congress alone controls all the inferior courts
IMO Pam needs to announce a national security investigation into the FISA Court possible unlawful spying on Americans.
This would allow Pam to get evidence & testimony from Boasberg, Roberts and those like Clarence Thomas who might also have insight if the FISA Court violated Americans rights.
The key is for Pam to apply pressure as she seeks truth and justice.
By the way here is my list of potential investigations that need to happen ASAP. How is Pam alone going to be blessed to get through all of these in 2+ years?
Russia Collusion
Seth Rich Murder
Impeachment 1 & 2
2020 Election Fraud
Attempted Assassination #1 & #2
Ukraine Money Laundering
Covid Gain of Function
Vaccine testing, approval & injuries
Weaponization of Agencies & fraudulent legal cases againstPT
USAID/NGO Money Laundering & Possible classified document destruction
Agency destruction of evidence
Biden Laptop
FISA Court – NSA/FISA surveillance abuse
Epstein Investigation
ActBlue Donations Investigation
Auto Pen Investigation
The auto pen investigation is a waste of resources, other than as a PR Narrative, as it inevitably comes down to asking a cognitively impaired person if he authorised the use of the autopen to sign those documents, and approved the documents, and Joe has already been deemed too impaired to prosecute, which means he is too impaired to testify.
Case closed…
LAWFARE: Judge Falsifies USAID Origins in Anti-Trump Order Rebuking ‘Unconstitutional’ Foreign Aid Freeze
18 Mar 2025
https://thenationalpulse.com/analysis-post/lawfare-judge-falsifies-usaid-origins-in-anti-trump-order-rebuking-unconstitutional-foreign-aid-freeze/
A federal judge, in a ruling aimed at restoring the core functions of the defunct United States Agency for International Development (USAID), appeared either to not know or, indeed, falsify how the agency was created. The bizarre error will now call into question the validity of his ruling Tuesday, which even seeks to reopen building access for dismissed USAID employees.
U.S. District Court Judge Theodore D. Chuang, who serves on the Federal District Court of Maryland bench and was appointed by former President Barack Obama, claims that Congress created USAID and, therefore, it cannot be shut down solely through presidential authority. However, this is not the case.
Yep .. for the record the USAID Office was created in 1961 by President John F Kennedy, as the Executive Branch mechanism to enact the Foreign Assistance Authorization BILLS and ACT(s) coming from Congress.
The President of the US Decides how the Executive Branch will implement BILLS, ACTS and Laws passed by Congress. So, president Trump has the power and authority to close it down and chose another way to implement Congressional Legislation he signs. (i.e. The Secretary of State via the State Department has already been tasked by President Trump to assume USAID roles).
Now an interesting $64,000 question … how did all these FOREIGN AIDE FUNDS end up in so many different places INSIDE the US as well as become FUNDS spent as “aide” (not part of contracts for overseas work) spent on projects INSIDE the US.
Apperently the Trump admin has finessed this, by appointing a DOGE Worker to head of USAID?
.
Judges don’t need to be “impeached”. They can be removed for “bad behavior”. The drafters of the Constitution did not specify “crimes” or “impeachment”. Congress needs to make a list of judges it deems have exercised bad behavior and just fire them.
Here are some suggestions: failure to recuse when they or a family member have a financial interest that creates a conflict or significant appearance of a conflict of interest; being overturned more than two times for rulings that violate the Constitution; failure to recuse after having presided over a case involving the same defendant, coupled with evidence of substantial partisan bias…
We don’t have to go through miserable time-wasting impeachment hearings. A majority vote can fire them. Legalman has convinced me (he argues that the PRESIDENT can fire judges!)
https://the-quash.captivate.fm/episode/judges-can-just-be-fired-anytime-they-dont-sit-for-life-
.
Thanks very much for posting this OC. Quite enlightening! I trust President Trump is very aware of this and will act accordingly. Or, have Congress act accordingly. Very good information, thanks again!
I would suggest it better to consider the writings of Justice Story “Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States” than some podcast “expert”.
https://lonang.com/library/reference/story-commentaries-us-constitution/sto-338/
.
What particular point or points would you have me consider in his treatise?
.
Judges don’t need to be “impeached”. They can be removed for “bad behavior”.
By who?
Congressmen engaging in the same bad behavior?
Always remember. Majority Leader Reid blew up the filibuster for district and circuit court judges in order to pack the DC Circuit with left wing partisan hacks so they could protect the corruption of our federal government, mostly br Democrats. He was working toward an effective one party state just like California has now with a one party judiciary. Democrats are Bolsheviks. Republicans are Mensheviks. Mensheviks eventually get put up against the wall and shot.
Good to look at The Judiciary Act of 1802
Jefferson had balls.
“It is almost unnecessary to add, that, although the constitution has, with so sedulous a care, endeavored to guard the judicial department from the overwhelming influence or power of the other coordinate departments of the government, it has not conferred upon them any inviolability, or irresponsibility for an abuse of their authority. On the contrary for any corrupt violation or omission of the high trusts confided to the judges, they are liable to be impeached, (as we have already seen,) and upon conviction, removed from office. Thus, on the one hand, a pure and independent administration of public justice is amply provided for; and, on the other hand, an urgent responsibility secured for fidelity to the people.”
“But, unfortunately, a measure was adopted in 1802 under the auspices of president Jefferson, which, if its constitutionality can be successfully vindicated, prostrates in the dust the independence of all inferior judges, both as to the tenure of their office, and their compensation for services, and leaves the constitution a miserable and vain delusion. In the year 1801, congress passed an act reorganizing the judiciary, and authorizing the appointment of sixteen new judges, with suitable salaries, to hold the circuit courts of the United States, in the different circuits created by the act, Under this act the circuit judges received their appointments, and performed the duties of their offices, until the year 1802, when the courts, established by the act, were abolished by a general repeal of it by congress, without in the slightest manner providing for the payment of the salaries of the judges, or for any continuation of their offices. The result of this act, therefore, is (so far as it is a precedent,) that, notwithstanding the constitutional tenure of office of the judges of the inferior courts is during good behavior, congress may, at any time, by a mere act of legislation, deprive them of their offices at pleasure, and with it take away their whole title to their salaries. How this can be reconciled with the terms, or the intent of the constitution, is more, than any ingenuity of argument has ever, as yet, been able to demonstrate. The system fell, because it was unpopular with those, who were then in possession of power; and the victims have hitherto remained without any indemnity from the justice of the government.”
.
On the contrary for any corrupt violation or omission of the high trusts confided to the judges, they are liable to be impeached…
Where in the Constitution does it say that judges must be “impeached” and then “convicted” (of what?) Do you think that the lawyers who wrote this document and argued over every provision, somehow forgot this?
Looks more like the document provided for establishment of inferior courts by Congress “from time to time”. What Congress can create, Congress can un-create.
.
Sundance:
Is Mary McCord related to James McCord of JFK assassination files? Old CIA guy I believe.
She has deleted all of her online past!
Very suspicious
She is a she???
I’m shocked.
I think she may deleted something else from her past
Listening to Charlie Kirk Show regarding what we should do now. Ignor injunctions? Appeal? Impeach?
All of this is going to greatly increase the amount of work for the Supreme Court. There are hundreds of injunctions. I don’t see how they can possibly keep up.
I think we need to greatly increase the number of justices on the Supreme Court. Right now when PDJT is the President. To help John Roberts do his work. s/
Instead of clamoring for impeachment let’s clamor for more Justices! They won’t like that at all.
It was either Justice Thomas or Justice Alito that commented during the last Trump term how wrong all these injunctions were and they were not right- somehow?
They had been rather rare before the Trump Presidency and now being misused as a means of stopping him- wrongly.
And that if it was to continue, the Supreme Court would have to deal with it.. he said this.
I just read this again the other day, I wish now I saved it.
Forgive me for the lack of details, that was the gist of what he said.
I’m pretty sure it was Justice Clarence Thomas..
Let’s see first ClineSmith falsified a document which leads to a FISA warrant being issued and Boasberg sentenced him to six months loss of law license and then James Wolfe photographed it and releases it to the press and Judge Ketanji Brown sentenced him to 2 months. An unredacted version which we have never seen and nobody was prosecuted for possessing it. The reason for the light sentence was Wolfe threatened destruction of the SSCI. And lo and behold she’s rewarded by a seat on USSC. James Wolfe immediately raised millions of dollars and attacked President Trump relentlessly.
Just saw your tweet on x to Laura Ingraham, Sundance. LOVED IT! She’s such a snake. Does POTUS know she’s a snake?
Post
See new posts
Conversation
Laura Ingraham
@IngrahamAngle
·
6h
Still waiting for Chief Justice Roberts findings on who leaked the Dobbs decision.
991
3.6K
20K
257K
TheLastRefuge
@TheLastRefuge2
Mary McCord’s husband, Sheldon Snook.
The couple y’all had dinner with recently.
Brutal honesty. Hehe
Can someone post the X link so I can forward to others? I’m not an X member.
Dang!
The truth has no agenda. The truth will not stay suppressed. The truth will expose the lies & transgressions of the evildoers. The truth cares not about our feelings. The truth will reveal every facade.
Simply CUT the budget of the federal judiciary by 50%! President Trump is doing it to the Education Department so do the same thing to the judges!
Or go the other way and add 50 DC district judges for PT to appoint and I bet the same crooked judges still get the cases against PT.
Amazing right?
If there was ever a good reason for waterboarding, you nailed it Sundance.
FWIW in her connections, I think Laura is a closeted gay person.
What do you think would be happening across America if this were Obama being opposed by Republican judges? I think he would have had Eric Holder immediately take action and there would have been democrat hired protests and mostly peaceful demonstrations.
The AG DID file a responce, lambssting the Judge, calling his actions “picayune” and basically telling him to pound sand.
Not sure what else Bondi bashers expect her to do.
Great, quick give her a participation medal. The appropriate response should have been- go away fool and stop interfering in Art II Executive Branch actions. Your little magic gavel has no power / authority here – include a copy of all 7 Articles highlighting the key Articles 1, 2, and 3.
US courts are looking a lot like Brazil.
The Constitution states that Justices “shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour.” This means that the Justices hold office as long as they choose and can only be removed from office by impeachment. Has a Justice ever been impeached? The only Justice to be impeached was Associate Justice Samuel Chase in 180
Treepers, spread Sundance’s explanation of the connection between Chief Justice Roberts, Judge Boasberg, Clinesmith, and Mary McCord to every rep you have an every connection you have, especially on social platforms.
Get the word out and hopefully conversations develop everywhere.
The Chief Justice has to go. Preferably, he’ll resign if this info reaches millions. The American people are finally seeing that every level of gov’t is corrupt.
Further, spread the word about Boasberg’s daughter getting money through NGOs. (His wife is involved with abortion clinics likely to receive money throught NGOs as well.) In fact his whole family profits from money that is from our tax dollars. No wonder a guy like this judge wants to get rid of any reformer such as Trump or Musk who takes easy money from his family.
Impeachment of Robers is on the table for me.
Who knows Tucker? This would be an incredible interview if he spoke with Sundance for an hour just on the topic of how the FISA Court was used to spy on thousands of Americans illegally.
This is the left’s last gasp in their attempt to derail President Trump, short of their constant temper tantrums.
It seems to me that, Boasberg is grave danger of being offered up to protect the institutions.
His actions threaten to drag down Robert’s, and many others.
After demanding violent gang members be returned, Boasberg’s blatant corruption is on display in a way that anyone, even a child, can fully understand. As such, he seems a liability to the others.
Don’t those FISA warrants work both ways? Shouldn’t we have access to all the bad actors that came within Trump’s orbit?
That always seemed the biggest flaw in their Russia gambit to me.
…and this “judicialism” is happening around the world…..NATO member Turkey is jailing the prime opposition candidate (mayor of Istanbul or as Steve Bannon says, Constantinople) to the 22 year Islamist President Erdogan. Turkey’s currency dropped 10% yesterday…
Justice Minister Yılmaz Tunç made a statement about the detention. “The judiciary does not take orders and instructions from anyone. It is never acceptable to threaten members of the judiciary. Judicial decision is binding for everyone. There is no privilege before the law,” he said…..from Turkish Daily News
https://www.turkishminute.com/2025/03/19/turkey-moving-at-full-speed-towards-a-complete-authoritarian-state4/
I’m a little late in commenting, so maybe this has already been said, but I would recommend that the DOJ go to the FISA court now (ex parte) and get a 702 query (under the Patriot Act) issued as against Boasberg (using/citing all of the matters described by SD) for potentially/actually resisting the Executive Branch from removing lawfully designated terrorists, and then let’s see what his emails, text messages and phone calls reveal. And, if it’s discovered that Boasberg conspired with others to thwart the removal of these designated terrorists, then let the fur fly. Judge Anthony Trenga (appointed by Bush) is now the presiding judge of the FISA court. Hopefully, he will not recuse himself (maybe wishful thinking).
This man has been highly partisan, worked to destroy democracy as it is commonly defined, abused his office repeatedly. He is corrupt and a major threat to democracy and freedom. Because of the corruption inherent in the government it is impossible to impeach such judges even if caught sleeping with dead children. So they must be investigated and charged as criminals for the civil crimes they have committed under RICO statutes. He has knowingly conspired with the DNC, NGOs, and parties hostile to the US government and persecuted individuals to deprive them of their liberties and freedoms. Send him to jail. These radical judges believe themselves above the law. Use these laws against them.
Where is Devin Nunes in this ? Shouldn’t he be knowledgeable of this ? Shouldn’t he be reading the treehouse !
Why is it Trump, or others in the administration aren’t pushing back on Robert’s with the following, simple clarity :
Justice Roberts – we’re not calling for the impeachment of Boasberg because of a disagreement over his recent decision. While this current decision is an extreme example of judicial overreach, Boasberg has been at the epicenter of All the false FISA warrants to spy on President Trump and his campaign. He has demonstrated a clear cut bias against this President, and is unable to restrain himself or recuse himself and act objectively. Boasberg has clearly demonstrated that he lacks the proper “judicial temperament” to serve as a federal judge and act impartially.
It is for these reasons we are calling for his impeachment.
I want to hear Karoline Leavitt, Stephen Miller and the President himself repeatedly explain the above on television.
Repeatedly.
Totally agree, sometimes I wonder ….
Then, in The Federalist Papers, which Constitutional Scholars
refer to, there is under Separation Of Powers & Checks and Balances,
that when a same hands group or faction, has control in all three
branches of Government, it is the very definition of tyranny.
We are in same hands control – Not safe hands…
Eyes Right…
I was just thinking about this this morning. What are the main things standing against President Trump and the Americans who overwhelmingly voted for him? In MHO the two most important issues are corrupt, activist judges who are overstepping their bounds and Soros and his ilk in the guise of NGOs which are fomenting violence. Soros and his influence in this country need to go. I think if even half the people who voted for Trump would contact the powers that be en masse and state in no uncertain terms that these two issues need to be addressed post haste it may induce some action. As well, if anyone and everyone (pod casters, conservative news outlets, X’ers, commenters, youtubers, etc.) would beat this drum and encourage congress to act it just might make something happen, it sure couldn’t hurt.
So how is Boasberg and Roberts going to feel when Pam, Kash and Gabbard open a National Security Investigation into the FISA Court and alleged illegal spying on Americans using NSA computer access within non government establishments?
Maybe turn about is fair play.
Speaking of the NSA. The NSA has keys to countless Deep State skeleton closets.
As of now, some guy named Timothy Haugh, is the director of the National Security Agency. He is a Biden appointee who also serves as the commander of the United States Cyber Command, and chief of the Central Security Service as well.
Why does Trump and Tulsi trust this Haugh dude to run the NSA and be forthcoming about Deep State corruption?
Already, some idiot with 6 cell phones with bizarre Ukraine connections tried to kill president Trump.
The NSA tracks every ping, text ,call, ip, email, web history, etc.
I can think of a bunch of cases the NSA can solve if they really wanted to.
It seems like a pretty critical person to replace, since this person does have an immense power to choose what evidence it wants to and not want to find.
Is there a reason this Haugh guy hasn’t been replaced?
Here’s another angle.
Chip Roy says to defund the rogue judges courts.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/rep-chip-roy-urges-congress-defund-radical-courts/
Law fare is the prosecution is the punishment not the conviction. Impeachment of Federal Judges purpose is not to remove the Judges but to give the House the power to compel testimony under oath and force the release of documents exposing the Judges corruption and using Law Fare against them because what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Also as an aside there was a judge who was impeached twice before being removed from office. The first time he managed to hide evidence and when it came to light his second impeachment resulted in his removal from office. He then became a democrat member of the House and participated in the Impeachment of President Trump.
A day is soon coming when one of two things will happen: (1) the Marxist-controlled Judicial Branch succeeds in usurping the Article II powers of the Executive Branch with the effect that a communist-led clique of globalist elitists gains near-total control of the US Federal Government; or (2) President Trump tells the Marxist-controlled Judicial Branch that they are engaged in an extra-constitutional judicial insurrection and that he and his administration will not comply with any orders from the Judicial Branch which are outside its constitutional authorities. (Suck on that John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett.)
“these people are not stupid” from the article. I disagree. I never met a law school transfer in the physics department. They are in the business of finding a group in which to belong. Look at the pictures of Clinesmith and Boasberg. They are not dream dates. All they want is revenge against the cool kids who ostracized them in high school. They will defend their peer group until the end or until their instructions are modified.
Thank you Sundance for unpacking this so clearly. Showing evidence for what we thought as true all along. Great job.
Boasberg has to go. Charged and sentenced. Or as Mouse posted below, “These aren’t firing offenses; nor impeachable; they’re sedition and insurrection in the real definitions of those words.” And should be treated as such.
Throw a rock in a pack of dogs the one who yelps got hit. Robert’s yelped on impeachment. Investigate Robert’s, turn his house upside down, go through his wife’s underwear, confiscate his phones and computers.
Then quietly take him aside and give him an option.
It seems to me that the only way to deal with these seditious judges and congressmen is to investigate and bring criminal charges to them. The democrats brought many cases against Trumps and he should find a way to do the same to them. Can Boasberg be charged with crimes or can he only be impeached like the President? Charges need to brought to all these criminals, they need to be investigated, swatted, subpoenaed, etc. The best defense is an attack.
also, Judge Colyer identified 85% of illegal uses of FISA warrants so why aren’t all those folks being prosecuted?
The only response to a lawless, imperial judiciary is a military (or police) one. Martial law, by an TRULY elected President, military tribunals and convictions, and no mercy to the anarchists and revolutionaries on the Federal bench, nor the “lawfare” lawyers. Apply the penalty for treason in the yard outside the court.
NOT what I or any one “MAGA” wants. However, there are three co-equal branches of government. When the Federal courts and Supreme Court Chief Justices goes “Marxist Brazilian” because of their hatred towards the current President, and the majority of the American people who elected him, what IS the alternative? If Roberts can used his like-minded District Judges to overrule the Constitutional and elected President, ROBERTS IS AN OUTLAW.
Roberts had the opportunity to ensure a Constitutional judiciary, to set the bar and draw the line. He refused. He set the Judiciary as a superior power to the Executive Branch, which is clearly unconstitutional. He and his band of “lawfare” practitioners are rogue outlaws.
I honestly don’t see any other way. If Trump simply refused Judicial authority, he’ll become the outlaw, which is EXACTLY what the lawfare lawyers want, and have been trying to ensure, for over five years. They want this to end with Trump in prison for life, his personal property stripped from his family, and NO one, no other citizen questioning their authority.
Am I wrong? Show me the evidence that proves me wrong? Who controls the D.C. and FISA courts? Who’s been the “power behind the throne, behind both Obama and Biden? Roberts is the menace. Roberts is the outlaw in judicial robes.
“If crimes are discovered, such as aiding and abetting terrorist organizations, the judges should be removed.”
I have been advocating for this as well on X. But removed, indicted, and imprisoned. Indeed, sit in prison until the trial….a ways down the road…like many J6ers had done to them.
As well: Trump team — but more presciently Repubs in the House and Senate — neeed to win the optics war against Biasberg:
Expose his positions EVERY night on national TV.
The spiderweb revealed…
The judge and the ACLU should be charged with Logan Act violation.
If the House does not impeach Boasberg there’s no point in voting for Republicans. Their passivity will be the death of the country. We’re are the Crossfire Hurricane documents Trump ordered declassified in 2021? On Bondi’s desk? Where is the investigation of January 6 the Republicans promised? Etc. Meanwhile we’re entertained by the drama surrounding yet another CR.
I’m not dooming, but I don’t wear rose colored glasses either. It’s pointless to vote for a party that can not deliver results. They need to deliver PDQ, they better impeach Boasberg, or the corrupt lawfare will destroy Trump & MAGA.
The court lacks jurisdiction but that hasn’t stopped Boasberg, he has engaged the Executive for the purpose of generating a procedural violation – perjury and/or contempt. Boasberg must be impeached.
Laura Loomer uncovered the link to the Judges daughter Katherine Boasberg, Partners for Justice.
Here is the like to Tides
https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/821202125/202421369349312307/full
This is the store front for Conextos.
ConTextos is an educational NGO established in El Salvador and the US. The organization offers a teacher training program, school libraries, and a tablet-based writing program.
The director of Contextos Debra Gittler is connected to AGLIN Aspen Institute.
https://agln.aspeninstitute.org/profile/3188
Bezo is on the Board of AGLIN.
time for the DOJ to initiate RICO investigations. 15 TROs in one month. more TROs against trump than against all other presidents combined. obvious coordination. judges, lawyers. need to be called to account.
Yep, someone needs to decipher how they coordinate their COMMS.
Then get PT to declassify their COMMS for all Americans to see.
Then maybe Pam can indict and prosecute someone.
So far she and Sessions have the same number of investigations – ZERO
There’s no authority on Earth, among men, that can force POTUS to bend a knee in acquiescence…
As I stated before, to do so, is a de facto usurpation of the sovereign authority of We The People
.
In God We Trust
Trust God
Fear not
If there is no authority to force POTUS to back down, why are we here?
This is not Regitiger.
This is a spammer of unknown provenance giving grammatical and phraseological indications of being located in India, but that could be faked by any Derp agency with the capacity to steal legitimate handles and avatars and post comments in their name and image, bypassing normal moderation protocols.
The unanswered question, besides who and how, is why this is being done.
because he respects the judicial process. if you ran your election on law and order, you can’t violate the law
Yes, true, but is it unlawful, morally no, but constitutionally, to assert, affirm, live and do the law as the President by doing what is the President’s constitutional duty, obligation and right???
Is this not the objective reality and truth presently:
The judges have no constitutional authority to do what they are doing, the president can continue doing what he is lawfully obliged and righted to do, with that intention, while having no intent to defy or effectively say ‘go pound sand’, though this can be a foreseen secondary consequence. It is not willed, the only thing willed and intended is to fulfill his, and the, presidential constitution duties, rights and faithfulness. It is not violation or unlawful to do this, with or without the presence of unlawful and void actions of the activists judges.
What they are doing has no constitutional or moral authority, validity or liceity, it is not binding, thus one is free to, and must, fulfill their presidential lawful fidelity and responsibilities/duties, not only irrespective of, but precisely more so, because of the non-binding treasonous activities.
Yes or no? And why? Thanks!!
also, this with the previous, a good day Jim, blessings:
https://thefederalist.com/2025/03/20/the-judicial-insurrection-is-worse-than-you-think/
I believe President Trump said they were not going to defy the laws. He doesn’t sound like he will just tell these judges to go pound salt. So, what will the outcome be here on these overreaching decisions by these lower court judges? What will the Trump team do to stop the judicial roadblocks the left cooked up to ‘get Trump’ this time. It seems pretty unbelievable that the Trump legal team did not expect this to happen since there isn’t much else left in the enemies’ back pack to go after PDJT this time around, but using the left wing appointed judges. Kind of a shot in the dark on their part, but all they had.
The question is, why is it working since it defies the Constitutional rights of the Executive office. It should have been stopped when it first started. Once one judge was allowed to get away with it and make it stick, the flood gates opened.
What is going to be done about it if it continues?
this might be of interest….shared from the federalist from today….it is not defying a non-binding activism unlawful, non-valid, a-liceity, rather is is simply to do what the president is constitutionally required faithfully to do:
<At this point it’s not too much to say that the federal judiciary has plunged us into a constitutional crisis. The fusillade of injunctions and temporary restraining orders issued by district court judges in recent weeks against the Trump administration — on everything from foreign aid to immigration enforcement to Defense Department enlistment policy to climate change grants for Citibank — boggles the mind.
More nationwide injunctions and restraining orders have been issued against Trump in the past month that were issued against the Biden administration in four years. On Wednesday alone, four different federal judges ordered Elon Musk to reinstate USAID workers (something he and DOGE have no authority to do), ordered President Trump to disclose sensitive operational details about the deportation flights of alleged terrorists, ordered the Department of Defense to admit individuals suffering from gender dysphoria to the military, and ordered the Department of Education to issue $600 million in DEI grants to schools.
On one level, what all this amounts to is an attempted takeover of the Executive Branch by the Judicial Branch — a judicial coup d’état. These judges are usurping President Trump’s valid exercise of his Executive Branch powers through sheer judicial fiat — a raw assertion of power by one branch of the federal government against another.
But on another, deeper level, this is an attempt by the judiciary to prevent the duly elected president from reclaiming control of the Executive Branch from the federal bureaucracy — the deep state, which has long functioned as an unelected and unaccountable fourth branch of the government. This unconstitutional fourth branch has always been controlled by Democrats and leftist ideologues who, under the guise of being nonpartisan experts neutrally administering the functions of government, have effectively supplanted the political branches. Unfortunately, to large extent the political branches have acquiesced in the usurpation of their authority.
Trump, with a strong mandate from the American electorate, has resolved to wrest control of the government from the deep state. The deep state in turn has been forced to fall back on its last line of defense: the courts.
What we’re seeing, in other words, is the return of the political (in the classical sense) to American governance. The political never really went away, of course. The idea of a neutral, nonpartisan class of experts and bureaucrats was always a fiction, a thinly-veiled scheme for implementing the Democrats’ agenda and neutralizing the effect of elections on actual governance. The voters could elect whomever they liked, but it would not much change what the bureaucracy did. This scheme has been the greatest scandal of modern American government, and the crisis unfolding now is a direct result of Trump’s efforts to dismantle it. >
Nothing. Everybody is, perhaps understandably, overlooking the overriding–and therefore the only important–factor in all this: The corruption is both total and terminal. The country will cease to exist in its current form–and not for the first time.
So, are we going to witness another assassination of yet another President? You are probably right, but the power to pull off that type of solution is in place already. Our military would have to get involved to save us from our own Government. Would they do it? Who knows and what would a military takeover create for a replacement of our Government?
You are right where your salutation is concerned because it seems like that is the only way Trump will survive a direct confrontation with the 4th Branch while they have the Chief Justice compromised. I think the first move would have to be to convince the Chief Justice to resign. That will also mean he will have to place his Country above his family, I recon.
What’s up Chief Justice John Roberts???
Answer: He’s owned, lock, stock, and barrel and as a result, dances to the music dictated to him by his owner (s). He’s a quisling and corrupt to boot.
Who grinds the organ for which he dances?
I remember reading, during his confirmation, that he and his wife have two children adopted under questionable circumstances. Those children are probably adults by now.
Conspiracy theory is that Epstein was involved in troubleshooting for the adoption—something about the adopted children were from Ireland which was somehow illegal and suddenly they were reclassified as kids from South America which made it OK or words to that effect.
So, he flipped on Obamacare and whatever key vote his puppet Masters demand. Maybe this needs a little sunlight to show that we know what they hold on Roberts and we are willing to investigate it too.
So, is it sheer arrogance on Boasberg’s part? They’ve got the corrupted scheme in place. Why rock the boat? Why make a spectacle on this issue which is a loser in the eye of the public? Seems the clever play would be to stay low profile.
Is’nt Amy in a similar boat?
I think Amy is just an AWFL (Affluent white female liberal) who allows her feelings to dictate her rulings and who constantly needs to “virtue signal” what a GOOD person that she is because she adopted children who were racial minorities, which just PROVES that she is better than the rest of us! /sarc
(Besides, Donald Trump is an “icky” misogynist and all the other “girls” on the court think so, too! Insert eyeroll!)
Feelings over the Constitution is not what Supreme Court Justices sign up for.
Feelings are EXACTLY what the female wing of the court aspired to bring to the Court.
The lesbian, wise Latina and DEI did not have to hide it. Phoney Barat was the fraud, stealthily installed by the Federalist Society.
Well, you can thank our “friends” at the Federalist Society” for Amy Phoney Barat.
“Seems the clever play would be to stay low profile.”
Maybe they are not clever.
The word TAX doesn’t appear anywhere in the Obamacare Bill and Barack himself stated that it was Not A Tax,… yet corrupt, compromised Chief Justice Roberts declares it a TAX.
No wonder We The People have lost faith and trust in SCOTUS. Time to declare Scotus in Contempt and demand Roberts resign.
Yes, they are now adults BUT the ramifications of a sitting judge manipulating the legal system to adopt Irish children, in a South American country (which I believe is what happened) would be huge, even now! It has been clear for a very long time that Roberts is compromised, AND he is an egotistical petty little man to boot, IMHO!
This reason keeps coming up and has for years yet no one has proven anything is true about it. Why bother to keep hitting this excuse anymore? Roberts is what he is and we all know that well by now. He will side with the left more times than the right if it’s a political issue. He cannot be called a conservative judge by any means.
Roberts should have been, and still should be, impeached for his blatantly unconstitutional opinion in the Obamacare “deem and pass Pelosi trick” case in 2010, which ruined the health care of untold millions.
His flip-flop twisting of the law to become chief legislator rendered him instantly unfit to be any kind of judge in the USA, and no one called him out on it.
That was the moment my stomach turned to lead and I realized we were in for a national nightmare with no end in sight.
Fifteen years, and counting….
Two blown inaugural oaths was also a feature, not a bug.
May Roberts and Pelosi receive a very warm welcome at their final destination, as destroyers of a once-great nation.
But he could probably still get in trouble for doing it.
Intel Community but Americans are hearing all over the radio and tv about the CIA killing JFK.
Still not sure why he as chosen as Chief Justice almost immediately after being elevated to the Court when Scalia should have been tapped.
I want to see the autopsy report on Scalia, believe he went the same way of JFK, RFK And King jnr. Too much of a threat and they got rid of the threat.
Mike Lindell sent a pillow to an Arizona ranch….
The deep McCord connections are enough. They got him.
Roberts is compromised up to his neck, that’s obvious. I thought that they only had the dirt on him with his adopted Irish kids when foreign adoption was not allowed.
But it seems Roberts is in bed with the far left. Biasberg and McCord.
Why? Let him testify before Congress as Hokkado suggested and impeach him. Time to clean the stable.
Pictures. Somewhere. Evidently lots of them.
“What’s up Chief Justice John Roberts???”
In the current–and wholly artificial and unnecessary–stalemate, absolutely nothing is up to him.
Trump is under no obligation whatsoever to obey these pretended “orders” from the inferior courts, which simply do not have jurisdiction in the matters under discussion here. This is not debatable; it’s unclear why the President–or anybody else–is paying it any attention whatsoever.
The Constitution is quite clear: The inferior federal courts are creatures of the Congress, not of the Constitution. Therefore, the separation of powers principle does not–CAN not–place them on an equal footing with the Executive.