In more than a few ways this decision is even more crazy than District Judge Beryl Howell’s prior rulings.
Judge Howell (pictured below) issued a temporary restraining order, blocking President Trump from barring the law firm of Perkins Coie from representing federal contractors.
There are a few outlines of the hearing HERE and HERE that essentially tell the story. Consider this quote:
“When you say that if the president, in his view, takes the position that an individual or an organization or a company is operating a way that is not in the nation’s interests, he can issue an executive order like this and take steps to bar that individual, that entity, that company from doing any business with the government, terminate whatever contracts they’ve got, bar them from federal buildings,” Howell said. “I mean, that’s a pretty extraordinary power for the president to exercise.”
Yes, and that’s called the power of the presidency. Apparently Judge Howell has never heard of ‘executive power’ that allows the elected President of the United States to determine what is in our nation’s best interests. Approving his ability to make these decisions, is what that whole voting thing is all about.
Howell further pressed — what would happen if Trump were to “get annoyed” by the law firm representing Perkins Coie in this lawsuit and issue a separate order targeting them?
“If he made a finding that there’s a national security risk with a particular law firm, then yes,” Mizelle responded.
Chad Mizelle is not exactly the best voice to be making the DOJ argument, after all it was this knucklehead who as Rod Rosenstein’s counsel wrote the authorities for the Robert Mueller special counsel. However, on this issue Mizelle is exactly correct.
Yes, the president has the ability to make decisions about national security threats and private enterprises who the President might feel are detrimental to the national security of our nation, like Perkins Coie. Howell then went into crazyville to extend her logic.
The executive order, which Trump issued last week, “runs head on into the wall of First Amendment protections,” the judge concluded.
No. That’s not at all what the executive order does. Perkins Coie is free to talk about how terrible Donald Trump is, free to rail against him, free to take to the public square and decry his approach, free to do and say anything they want; the law firm just cannot represent federal contractors or hold security clearances granting them access to materials that are national security matters.
The core of Beryl Howell’s decision boils down to her wanting to protect the business interests of Perkins Coie. Howell/Coie want the firm to retain access to clients who are federal contractors.
Even Perkins Coie didn’t try to keep their security clearances because they know the President has absolute plenary power to issue or remove them.
[…] The executive order also stripped security clearances from lawyers at the firm, but the firm has not challenged that provision. Under Supreme Court precedent, the president has nearly unfettered discretion to grant or remove security clearances.
Dane Butswinkas, a lawyer representing Perkins Coie, described the president’s order as “like a tsunami waiting to hit the firm.”
“It truly is life-threatening. … It will spell the end of the law firm,” he said. (source)
Apparently, stopping Perkins Coie from representing federal contractors will “spell the end of the law firm.”
That’s interesting.
Can another judge, a judge wearing a white hate, issue a temporary restraining order on her?
I demand we restrain her from breathing for a period of five minutes.
That should fix all that ails her.
for once I can say I like the “alt-text” that describes the photo:
“A person wearing a black robe”
Cuidado amigo.
Might want to revise and extend your remarks to clarify that was merely hyperbole and opinion, which I am sure it was.
We are all incredibly annoyed.
Yet, let it not cause us to make unforced errors.
But what fun is hyperbole without spittle spitting detractors screaming for justice, denouncing my parentage, and calling for my own summary execution?
I hear you though.
I’ve no more right to joke about her God granted mortality than, say, does a lower court judge to shut my mouth by overstepping the bounds of the Constitution to restrain and silence the Executive I voted to lead this Republic.
Well said sir, do NOT stop exercising your first amendment rights.🇺🇲
I respectfully disagree.
It’s true that the Marxist Lawfare Regime can take our words and use them against us. That does not mean, however, that we must be timid about openly criticizing those cretins.
That includes using words that we know will be offensive to those who we are criticizing.
Keep speaking truth Maquis! May God continue to bless the truth tellers!
Forgot your../S
Sneaky wit a Capital S!
I did give you a thumbs up.😂🤪🤗🤫🫡
Ooh, you bad girl you!
That is called the “law of necessity.”
Funny!! Thank you for the laugh!!
Can another judge, a judge wearing a white hate, issue a temporary restraining order on her?
better be a white hat
we got enough of that white hate going ’round
Perhaps the Judge needs a refresher course to brush up on her skills & capabilities…
How about her Constitutional knowledge?
Or at least re-read the constitution, or in her case read it for the first time.
Maybe law school…does Hillsdale have one? Oh, Liberty!
A little less white hate in the world, what with the DC Plaza getting rid of that obnoxious blm banner removed from the pavement….
Make DC Great Again
As rare as a white Rino…oh, that was crass of me!
I was under the impression from Sundance that the federal courts always defer to the DOJ National Security Lawyers on matters of national security matters. What, you mean not when it benefits President Trump? LOL
Just like everything else, only when it suits them. Once again their hypocrisy is showing.
What prevents us from FOIA’ing her emails? And her personal emails if it involves governmental actions or affects decisions for her judgements?
If only we didn’t have a couple of compromised SC Judges this could all slow way down.
A couple? 4 at least.
DOGE The Supremes? I say OK..
There’s a troubling aspect of the “left” which patriotic Americans have never been able to counter. The subversives will kill not only their opponents, but also send messages by murdering low-level staffers or interns or relatives to send a message. We’ve all seen the “accidents” or coincidences, or tragic circumstances where no perpetrator could be found.
There are more of us than them, and yet even an historic showing in the bitter cold in DC in Jan. 2021 by patriotic law-abiding citizens resulted in punishment, many paying a horrible price.
Not compromised, they are playing 4D-chess with the liberals! /sarc
Ooh-Boy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
President Trump Signs an Executive Order That He Will Ignore All Lower Court Rulings Until SCOTUS Rules on the Constitutionality of Activist Judges
https://gellerreport.com/2025/03/president-trump-signs-eo-that-he-will-ignore-all-lower-court-rulings.html/
Lol finally.
The court has made it’s decision. Now let them enforce it.
Exactly.
Awesome. Can’t wait to see how many Supreme’s disagree with the Executive branch. If they’re not going to uphold the Constitution, why are they even seated on the court? I would be an advocate of disbarring a couple of them.
It’s pretty clear:
1. The democrat “voters” – including the dead, paper & illegals, have failed.
2. The democrat politicians have failed.
3. The alphabet agencies have failed.
4. The democrat media has failed.
5. The democrat DA’s have failed.
… ALL … have failed to stop President Trump.
Next … The only thing democrat lunatics have left … democrat judges … including those on the Supreme Court.
May our Dear God please continue to send his Warrior Angels to protect President Trump. Amen 🙏
Amen 🙏🏻
I would advocate other more direct means but …..I digress
Should he invoke SCOTUS? Why not just declare these are Executive powers assigned to a separate and equal branch of govt by the Constitution and such are not subject to interference by the judiciary – including SCOTUS.
The constitution is clear. One branch can’t interfere with another branch.
👁️👁️ never heard of checks and balances, separate but equal..?
You mean like the 22nd Amendment for Presidential term limits?
Ghastly unconstitutionally congressional over-reach. These are not equal branches if one branch has term limits, imposed by another branch and the other branches do not.
Spit.
I’ve not seen that reported anywhere else.
Because it didn’t happen.
I appreciate that this is an open forum (for the mostpart), and opinions are welcome. However, it seems CTH would be better served if those who jump to post unverified “nooz” and stupid stuff they find on the internet were kindly informed and put into moderation if they post false info.
It is up to YOU to determine if information has merit.
There is no such thing as mis, dis, or mal information.
I did, and am sure that many others also wasted their time reading that link and hunting around the interwebs for confirmation. There’s simply too much going on right now to read/watch/listen to it all, and I preferred it when commenters here did better research before posting.
Is it on ‘Truth’? I’ve not been able to find it anywhere 🤔
Neither have I. I’m wondering if Pam Geller’s article is a “Babylon Bee”-type stunt, wishful thinking, or is actually the truth.
No such link in the link.
Misleading headline.
Click bait
😞
Thank you Bill!!!
Dane Butswinkas, a lawyer representing Perkins Coie, described the president’s order as “like a tsunami waiting to hit the firm.”
“It truly is life-threatening. … It will spell the end of the law firm,” he said. (source)
Poor Dane. He does not realize his comments should be past tense. RIPieces Perkins Coie. Well deserved.
Want to bet that Dane isn’t a Dane! LOL
I hope Done Buttswinkass sees his ass
What a name!
I saw this reposted by a few people on X earlier. I clicked into the original post, and it clearly stated it was a parody account.
I also clicked into your link, and I see no source of where this comes from.
Trump DID NOT sign and EO to ignore lower court rulings according to Whitehouse.gov.
🇺🇲Can you hear that……
💥heads exploding all over the country and if you listen carefully all around the world!🇺🇲
When did The President sign this? I have not seen it on his TS account.
Closest to subject, other than said column is http://www.gatewaypundit.com Trump signs EO order cracking down on radical judges. It states that anyone wishing to bring a case must put forth a deposit, therefore the tax payers will not be the ones footing the bill.
Now predict the perilous prospects of the party that should have been banned after the Civil War!
Pompous Commie Twit!
They would have changed their name to The Liberty Party and pulled the same sh*t under a different banner.
Evil is a human defect. It will always appear; requires vigilance, strength, and perseverance to remain free.
We can turn the argument around…..
What if a judge were to decide the 2nd amendment didn’t apply?
See how that works.
So does he have to listen or not?
Constitution Says: Hell No!
Good! He should make a statement to get it through their heads.
Check Bill upthread at 11:10, seems PDJT actually put out an EO declaring he will ignore all activist judges until the Supreme Court rules on the idiocy of Rule by Commie Ankle-Biters!
Mebbe not . . .
But he has made certain appeals that will surely hit SCOTUS and moot the lot of them!
So does Thomas Jefferson, the writer OF the Constitution, who directly addressed this very question.
The Constitution is THE ultimate law of the land. Any legislation or court ruling in violation of the Constitution is illegal or not legal, and as such nobody, including the POTUS, has any need to obey it.
Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.
I bet she runs her household with executive authority.
How does she think this ruling could pass appellate review?
How does she think this ruling could pass appellate review?
She knows it won’t. She’s just trying to delay Trump’s agenda for a time. Throwing sand in the works. Yes, we’re at that level in the federal judiciary.
Correct
She’s just marking her trail as being simpatico with the leftist-hive-mind.
When are we going to excise these cancers from our judiciary?
All of these actions by judges are designed to mire President Trump’s entire administration in costly legal battles. Time is of the essence….Supremes are going to have to address the problem.
Wondering, when the President lawyers appeal this ruling, with the Supreme Court say the President has no standing?
That’s really where we are as a nation isn’t it.
Paging Chief Justice Roberts……………
The judiciary is becoming the laughing stock of this country with rogue judges who ignore Article II
Hopefully Roberts cares about the integrity of the US Constitution.
The guy that told Rand Paul that he couldn’t say Eric Ciarmella on the Senate floor in a trial to remove the President? That Judge Roberts? The guy that’s supposed to reign in FISC judges like Boasberg and Contreras? That Judge Roberts? Every time he opens his mouth you can see the fingers of the Deep State behind his teeth working him like a sock puppet.
Call me a cynic, but it’s more likely the compromised Roberts has simply been waiting for DJT to get frustrated and start ignoring the rulings. The house will start impeachment proceedings, he’ll be convicted in the senate and removed. Everything goes back to how it was (fully funded with this CR) and SCOTUS never has to rule on the cases.
Is it just me, or does anybody else find that Judge Howell looks just like that cafeteria lady that used to slop your lunch tray with mashed potatoes every Thursday back in elementary school?
I think she bears a strong resemblance to the beloved Lt. Col. Vindman.
https://sl.bing.net/d0TIWk5oHJI
Or HRC
🤮
^^^ That’s it! I couldn’t put my finger on it!! 😂
I knew I recognized her. Just couldn’t place it.
What does that make the count to date?
10-15 rulings by judges stopping the President of the US from doing his job.
Do any of them read the Constitution? Specifically Article II?
How long does Roberts allow this to continue before a complete mockery of the Constitution is made?
JB. Williams
According to democrat politicians, judges, lawyers, and the news media, “there was no election fraud in 2020.” This claim is made entirely on the basis that no court in the country has agreed to review any evidence of the fraud in their courtrooms. Every court has taken the Sergeant Shultz “I see nothing, I hear nothing, I know nothing” position, as if ignoring the evidence somehow discredits the evidence, or makes it vanish.
What the courts have actually done is deny due process of law on the most critical case of political corruption in our 244-years. They have violated their oaths, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and every legal American and in so doing, they have all but guaranteed the total collapse of the USA.
The courts, all the way to and including the U.S. Supreme Court, have eliminated themselves from the equation. They are no longer a legitimate active part of our constitutional form of government. They have removed themselves from the process of justice and placed justice in the hands of the American people. The Article III branch of the Federal government (the Judiciary) no longer holds any constitutional authority over anything! They have totally abdicated any lawful authority over anything at this point.
So, who is stopping them?
Yes, if I recall, no one had standing to object and file a claim in court.
Roberts? he’s busy soiling his pants because he hasn’t found a way to weasel out of it.
“What does that make the count to date?”
Margot Cleveland has the list at the end of this:
https://gellerreport.com/2025/03/president-trump-signs-eo-that-he-will-ignore-all-lower-court-rulings.html/
Well your honor, President Trump has a 1st Amendment right to tell Perkins Cole they can’t represent Federal contractors.
He should just have them debarred from doing any business with the federal government.
And state the reasons for such are classified and cannot be shared with the court or the defendant.
Same as they tried with Mar-A-Lago.
Wait, what?
A district court judge overriding a decision of the President on a matter of national security?
Will be genuinely stunned if this ruling survives appeal.
It won’t. Remember when Judge Cannon in FLA wanted to appoint a special master to review the MAL documents?
Biden’s DOJ objected, and made a big stink about some of the documents pertained to “national security,” and the appeals court reversed Cannon, saying the court had to defer to the Executive Branch, and couldn’t inquire as to whether something was actually a matter of national security.
Exactly! Beryl knows that too but her loyalty to Bolsheviks is too deep!
PDJT should remove the judges security clearance and her executive parking pass as well.
“When you say that if the president, in his view, takes the position that an individual or an organization or a company is operating a way that is not in the nation’s interests, he can issue an executive order like this and take steps to bar that individual, that entity, that company from doing any business with the government, terminate whatever contracts they’ve got, bar them from federal buildings,” Howell said. “I mean, that’s a pretty extraordinary power for the president to exercise.”
Nuance / strawman question… the revocation of the security clearance does not bar them from doing “any business” with the federal government. It does however restrict them from business that includes classified information – whether as a representative for the government or other entity.
Howell further pressed — what would happen if Trump were to “get annoyed” by the law firm representing Perkins Coie in this lawsuit and issue a separate order targeting them?
“If he made a finding that there’s a national security risk with a particular law firm, then yes,” Mizelle responded.
…
Again, a non relevant question… what part of this case would require accessing classified informative by the firm representing Perkins/Coie?
So even if they are denied a security clearance, how would that affect this case?
Made a finding?
Recognized, Determined.
The executive order, which Trump issued last week, “runs head on into the wall of First Amendment protections,” the judge concluded.
…
So, we all have a first amendment right to a security clearance? If so, Trump and some of his lawyers may have a few questions…
Yes- apparently Jeffrey Epstein had some clearances, but the Seth Rich investigator- not so much.
She is so totally corrupt. How many outrageous Biden (or whomever) EOs did she find extraordinary? Rhetorical
This isn’t Brazil; she doesn’t get to do as she damn well pleases. She needs to get the hell back in her lane!
Trump’s order basically says that he does not trust the quality of the legal services that Perkins Coie would offer to the federal government, nor its ability to comply with national security requirements.
A client can fire a lawyer at any time if the client is dissatisfied with how the firm is representing its interests. The firm is entitled to be paid for work done, but the client can walk away.
PC offers excellent consultation on bleach bit/hard drive destruction, according to the HRC testimonial.
I did products liability in Philadelphia for years. It was one of the biggest jurisdictions for the filing of asbestos-related lawsuits.
Over the years, the manufacturers went bankrupt one by one. And many of the firms that represented them went under or broke up, because a particular manufacturer providing the bulk of their billable work went under, without advance notice to their firms. One savvy managing partner insisted his client pay for the legal work by certified check on a weekly, rather than monthly, basis, so it wouldn’t have been caught with hundreds of thousand of dollars in legal services that just made the firm one more unsecured creditor in bankruptcy court.
It’s quite funny really. Howells is saying, “Oh noes! We might have lawyers out of work! I can’t allow that!”
Learn to code.
Learn to Coal!!
Learn to Sushi..
Beurk! 🤢
Learn to plumb
Learn to HVAC
Learn to “think” first of all.
Who would handle disbarring an outfit of ill repute like Perkins Coie?
Who judicates the Judges when their judgment is not sound?
Congress, sadly.
President Trump signs EO that he will ignore these flagrant political judges.
https://gellerreport.com/2025/03/president-trump-signs-eo-that-he-will-ignore-all-lower-court-rulings.html/
Parody account?
Phony Barrett is drafting her dissent as we speak..
Amy Commie Barrett?
This is going to backfire in ways the judiciary is not anticipating. By taking such a short sighted, partisan, and cynical stance, they risk losing all of their judicial powers through Congressional legislation and SCOTUS rebuke.
Their “rulings” are so absurd and over the top as to demand everyone start ignoring them. Particularly Trump. Maybe that’s the strategery, but it’s difficult to see how this will be allowed to continue.
And btw, judges CAN be subpoenaed.
They need to be investigated.
Their Communist Conspiracy has not transpired in a vacuum.
The entire scheme must be uprooted and prosecuted, the greatest RICO prosecution in the history of prosecutions, no perpetrator spared, no darkness left unprobed, no “greatest ally” spared.
A true Golden Age for all Mankind.
Calling Pam Bondi. Is Pam Bondi in the house.
Probably on her way to the Fox News studio.
FYI Chad’s wife:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathryn_Kimball_Mizelle
This was the judge that convicted j 6 ers. This law group hung Trump for made Russia collusion. She’s the worst. An Obama hack in DC court.
Perkins Coie has even bigger problems than not being able to hob nob with recalcitrant feds.
“Is all the foreign money in.”
=>
RICO, conspiracy to violate campaign finance laws, election interference . . .
Yep, and Team Trump should be framing these decisions as an ongoing criminal investigation.
I’m impatiently waiting for someone in power to see that much of a solution lies with Congress, not appellate courts. Congress has all Constitutional power when it comes to the courts other than the Supreme Court.
To wit: The DC Circuit is a creation of Congress; it can be done away with. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are a creation of Congress and Rule 65 can be amended to require, e.g., that where the executive branch is a defendant in the case of a TRO or preliminary injunction, a panel of [5] district judges must at least 4-1 or unanimously approve of any such nationwide injunctive relief. Further, where the injunctive relief is approved on this basis, it is automatically appealed to a [5] judge panel an appellate court within 48 hours for confirmation.
These district judges are DISTRICT judges, not NATIONWIDE judges. Even a Supreme Court judge doesn’t have the individual power these DISTRICT judges have and this judicial usurpation of power needs to be reined in. By Congress.
Lord Have Mercy. I wish I could get comfortable to rest and forget about this BS.
Our system is non functioning at this point.
Good luck getting the Senate to approve it.
Getting people in Congress on record with key votes has political value. People also said in 2010, “good luck getting someone from the Tea Party elected president.”
Kompromat is in the other hand these days.
Play MAGA for me.
We’ll see what happens, but I, too, am firmly in the camp of destroying the DC Court System.
It should be a priority to eliminate the DC circuit because of criminal matters as well. The 6th Amendment is the problem here because its intention actually works in opposite fashion when it comes to DC. It provides that criminal prosecution must occur where the crime occurred. This requirement was devastating to J6 Defendants. If the DC Circuit were removed, the jury pool for such defendants might at least give them a fighting chance against conviction if the district were large enough to be more than just horrible DC Democrat enclaves.
Federal prosecutions should occur in the state and district of the target.
Put the pain of the punishment on the other jackboot.
The DC underclass is a Communist Overclass when it comes to judging their “peers.”
I don’t disagree but the 6th Amendment is very clear to the contrary.: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed[.]
First of all, DC is not a state (although there are plenty on the left who wants it to be one), and Second, Congress has complete control in the districting of the lower courts. They can make crimes that happen in DC be under a Maryland or Virginia district.
Does everyone of these lunatic rulings have to go to the Supreme Court? Did this judge even go to law school? I agree, this is so ridiculous.
Too bad Perkins Coie made it though they had no other clients. Good riddance.
Specializing in one particular kind of law isn’t necessarily unwise, but limiting the work to one big client is.
Basing the existence of your firm on one big client is a foolish mistake. The client can go bust or decided to go to another law firm, if the client’s management changes or another law firm lures the client away (Yes, law firms will try to shamelessly steal other firms’ clients.). If the client changes insurance companies, the insurer might decide to change law firms.
‘Better call Saul’ the spin off of ‘Breaking Bad’ was a learning curve of law firms stealing clients..
I love that show and whereas I have never had any interest in a sweatshirt from my BIGLAW school; I am jonesing for Saul’s “University of American Samoa Law School” one. A great touch by the show creators to mock people who wear Harvard type shirts.
Another truism the show captures is the absolute disdain BIGLAW firm lawyers have for people who don’t go to a top 10 law school. It is kind of funny in the context of that show because Albuquerque is very downmarket to begin with for someone in DC or New York City who has that sort of “I’m superior” mentality and disdain for others.
It seems everyone (with good reason) believed a government job is forever. Trump says, “No way, Jose.” Or, maybe just to be politically correct, no way, Joe.
I remember a guy I was acquainted with in law school going to work for that firm in Seattle. I expect they have more clients than just federal contractors. Perhaps it’s the firm’s DC office that would be at risk. Any firm where Marc Elias is a partner is extra disgusting.
Howel, Berman-Jackson, Emmit Sullivan, Chutkan, etc, Congress should have had a list to start impeaching these racketeers on day one of the new majority in the Senate.
Didn’t DOJ ANDREW WEISSMANN destroy ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP and ~85,ooo jobs, only too be later overturned by SCOTUS 9-0???
Yes, way too late for Andersen, tho.
We simply have to get these lunatics off the bench if we are ever to have a country again.
I guarantee she has a pink p%ssy hat in her closet. These judges need to be removed.
It’s past time for SCOTUS to slap there radical leftist District Judges down.
Why doesn’t the administration just ignore these judges and let them try to enforce their orders. They do not have this authority that they think they have.
Thats what they WANT PDJT to do, they are tryingbto bsit him, to do just that.
Then they say “We TOLD you he was a dictator, he’s ignoring/violating the law, a high crime,! Impeach!
Individuals like howell, chutkan and reyes, are nothing more than partisan activist hacks. Not sure any of them are qualified to be judges. They are ethically and morally corrupt.
BS, it will be the end of the law firm. Not that it would be a bad thing if it were.
Perkins Coie’s business model and the value of its services appears to be entirely dependent on access to classified databases maintained by the Federal Government. Without being able to access those databases and launder classified information, Perkins Coie has nothing to offer anyone.
Removing access to classified information for them is the equivalent of sticking an ice pick in the side a bouncy castle.
There really should be some policy where if a judge is overturned a certain number of times they are fired, disbarred, and maybe jailed. Particularly if you’re overturned by the Supreme Court, you f’d up on your fundamental understanding of the Constitution and should be fired.
Congress needs to make it easier to impeach judges. Then start, wait for it…impeaching judges.
Sometimes I wish the GOP were like the DEMS who walk lockstep into whatever god-forsaken demonized position their leaders tell them to walk to. Even so, I think the GOP is changing and we might see more solidarity here in the future. They know the future of the republic is at stake.
Judge Howell looks like she could be Hilldawg’s sister…
Why does Perkins Coie get a security clearance but I don’t get one?
Seems mean and overly powerful of the judge to think they get one but I don’t.
Funny how so many of the rich and powerful are deemed more equal than we are.
Almost like there are hidden familial relationships being kept on the down low.
Some roots are really close to the tree!
Especially when it comes to some of
those families.😳
😉 😉 😉
“The executive order, which Trump issued last week, “runs head on into the wall of First Amendment protections,” the judge concluded.”
Crazy, aging, cat-ranching judges are nuttier than squirrel turds. Particularly those who do the unwashed Hillary look.
A private business has First Amendment protections to continue using a government resource? Or is she saying they have the right to represent those who target certain individuals using Lawfare?
I don’t understand why the DOJ just doesn’t march into these courtrooms and declare whatever case is in front of them has national security implications. Those were the magic words used so often by the left in the last reign of error.
Just as nutty as the judge declaring Pete Hegseth doesn’t have enough military experience (in her opinion anyway) to ban trannies from the military. Does she next rule on whether units can be deployed anywhere in the world?
Of course, she completely ignores Ash Carter as SecDef who lifted the ban on transgender officers serving. Same Ash Carter who served zero days in the military.
Let’s see, is Beryl Howell on my list of the usual suspects?
Why yes it is, what a surprise.
Reid Hoffman, Chuck Schumer, Diane Feinstein, Gerald Nadler, Norm Eisen, Rachael Maddow, Benjamin Wittes, Kevin Klinesmith, George Soros, Merrick Garland, Andrew Weissman, Zelensky, Mark Zuckerberg, Ruth Ginsberg, Marianne Williamson, Amy Totenberg, Daniel Goldman, Barry Berke, Adam Schiff, David Laufman, Judge James Boasberg, Michael Bloomberg, Abbe Lowell, Jonathan Pollard, Jena Griswold, Michael Bromwich, Amy Berman Jackson, Saul Alinsky, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Michael Sussmann, Marc Elias, Michael Cohen, Cass Sunstein, Joshua Steinglass, Sulzberger, Dana Bash, Bob Bauer, Anita Dunn, Ron Klain, Antony Blinken, Jamie Gangel, Keith Olbermann, Jamin Ben Raskin, Martha Raddatz, Laurence Tribe, Paul Rosenzweig, David Axelrod, The ACLU, Jared Shutz (Polis), Jen Rubin, Nan Aron, Dafna Yoran, Rob Reiner, Andrea Mitchell, Lyor Cohen, Judge Paul Engelmayer, Beryl Howell, Victoria Nuland, Bernie Sanders,
The point is to delay any Order and hope Trump gives up. They did it during Trump 1.0. And succeeded. The Democrats flooded the Courts with Left wing crazzies. Obama was a role model for them.
It sounds like the judge is a national security risk.
“It truly is life-threatening. … It will spell the end of the law firm,” he said. Or is the real cause the end of USAID? Just wondering how many leftist domestic Lawfare lawfirms got funded by USAID?
Well, look at ActBlue…
The rats are scurrying.
The good news is these cases are so egregious, and so numerous, that the Supreme Court is going to have to rule in Trump’s favor. Trump did the firehouse approach to his Executive Orders and caused tens of lawsuits on the same issue, Presidential authority.
If Trump would have slow walked his EO’s, causing only a few lawsuits, those lawsuits may have filtered through the system so slowly that they could have damaged Trumps ability to lead the nation.
Trump could speed up the SCOTUS ruling by refusing to comply, forcing a constitutional crisis.
Even losing an election BIGLY has not kept Democrats/the left from wasting taxpayer dollars on a daily basis. This is an exercise in futility for them, but if they’re not creating chaos or trying to stop President Trump from being successful, then they have no purpose in life. Oxygen thieves.
Over the target.
I thought once it became an FBI desk it was no longer “private”….it is publically owned by the taxpayers. We own that. Where does the left get all these pretend crackpots? Law schools have really dumbed down. So sad.
Any legal actions against Trump’s use of executive branch powers should have to be filed directly with the USSC.
The ‘inferior courts’ have no standing to rule on a presidents administration of the Executive branch.
The inferior courts are created by Congress and are NOT part of the so-called co-equal Judicial Branch.
The only members of the co-equal Judicial branch are the members of the Supreme Court.
Also, the Supreme Court has ZERO direct administrative, or operational, control of the inferior courts except through ruling against inferior court judgements.
Why do these District judges think they can over-rule a Presidential order? Delusions of grandeur? TDS? Because they get away with it (temporarily, I hope)? It’s time we include disbarment under Presidential Administration’s authority! All these orders do is waste everyone’s time and our taxes!