We are in an abusive relationship with govt.
If you could take High Resolution pictures from the J6 crowd and run them through Palantir’s facial recognition software, you would note some of the images are oddly blurred during the result. [I’ve seen it] This outcome is due to definitions in the software that remove certain classified results, per the contracted partnership.
I have been deep into this matrix for more than a moment. Earlier today Mike Benz said, “In 2021, I spent literally hundreds of hours on the Jan 6 pipe bomber. One thing I never published until now still bothers me to this day: I believe the FBI, in addition to nuking the frame rate on the DNC security camera, blurred the eyes so no one could ID based on biometrics.“….. Interestingly, I can not only confirm Benz’s suspicions, I have witnessed the outcome. You might even call this the beta test for what lies ahead.
In 2021, I spent literally hundreds of hours on the Jan 6 pipe bomber. One thing I never published until now still bothers me to this day: I believe the FBI, in addition to nuking the frame rate on the DNC security camera, blurred the eyes so no one could ID based on biometrics. pic.twitter.com/AMavZFFJln
— Mike Benz (@MikeBenzCyber) January 6, 2025
You see, the product that Palantir (Thiel) and the aligned group of beneficiaries from the NEW, updated, surveillance tech state has created, needs to have certain parameters in order to qualify for lucrative contracts under the auspices of ‘national security.’ They needed a package that allowed control of outcomes. Those specially defined people are ghost walkers.
As we celebrate the gaslighting embarrassment, also known as the fourth anniversary of the FBI’s fedsurrection, we would be wise to remember the operational motives and intents. The FBI previously laughed in the faces of the general population. The DC-based FBI sent out the following message.
Yes, the national kidnappers have removed their masks. Y’all know what that metaphor means.
Once again, for those who just walked in…. Following the scale of manipulation within the 2020 election, those who did the manipulation, which included support from the FBI and DOJ, justified to keep their institutional agencies from being exposed, needed to do something to stop any state delegate challenge. One successful state election challenge would have upended the entire system. They needed an emergency session for the January 6th electoral certification.
The pipe bombs found in DC on January 6th, were essentially the insurance policy. The FBI was supporting the need for a stoppage of the 2020 electoral certification session in congress. If the FBI could not manipulate the crowd into entering the Capitol Building, the “discovery” of the pipe bombs would have been used to shut down the certification session. Speaker Pelosi would then gain emergency power, switch to an emergency session upon return, and any effort to challenge the delegate affirmation would be nulled. The latter described action by Pelosi is exactly what happened.
Repost Due to Current Media Cycle News
The Ring of Truth – “I am too well accustomed to the taking of evidence not to detect the ring of truth.” 1908, Edith Wharton
Much has been made of the events of January 6, 2021, and with the latest broadcast of CCTV video from inside the Capitol Hill complex, more questions have been raised.
Within the questions: the FBI and government apparatus had advanced knowledge of the scale of the J6 mall assembly yet doing nothing? Why were the Capitol Hill police never informed of the FBI concerns? Why didn’t House Speaker Nancy Pelosi secure the Capitol Hill complex, and why did she deny the request by President Trump to call up the national guard for security support? Why did the FBI have agent provocateurs in the crowd, seemingly stimulating rage within a peaceful crowd to enter the Capitol Building?
There have always been these nagging questions around ‘why’?
Long time CTH reader “Regitiger” has spent a great deal of time reviewing the entire process, looking at the granular timeline and then overlaying the bigger picture of the constitutional and parliamentary process itself. What follows below is a brilliant analysis of the federal government motive to create a J6 crisis that permitted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to trigger an emergency session and avoid the 2020 election certification challenges.
Those congressional floor challenges, known and anticipated well in advance of the morning of January 6, 2021, would have formed a legal and constitutional basis for ‘standing’ in judicial challenges that would have eventually reached the Supreme Court. The certification during “emergency session” eliminated the problem for Washington DC.
Regitiger explains below, only edited by me for clarity and context:
I think most, not all, but a large number of people, are totally missing what happened; and why this happened on Jan 6th. I am going to try my best to outline the events that day, blast past the commonly held assumptions and get right down to the core corruption.
I will present this as a series of questions and answers.
♦ Q1: How do you prevent congress from delaying the certification of state electoral votes?
A: It requires a crisis. A crisis that creates an “emergency” …An “emergency” that invokes special house rules.
FACTS: Remember carefully, focus please. Just moments, literally 3 minutes before two representatives issued a vote for motions to suspend the certification, the House members were “informed” by capitol police and other “agents” that a protest was about to breach the chambers. It was at this time that key people: Pence, Pelosi, Schumer, Mcconnell can be seen being walked out and escorted from the chamber. This effectively halted the Entire Chamber Process.
♦ Q2: Why was it necessary to halt the chamber process?
A: The crisis was created to eliminate the motion challenges to halt the certification and to begin voting to look into voting irregularities and fraud
FACTS: The two motions were completely legal and constitutional under at least two constitutionally recognized procedures… procedures that would REQUIRE the house to pause the certification and then vote to determine whether the motions of suspend could move forward.
♦ Q3: What was so important to refuse this motion and the subsequent votes to suspend the electoral certification?
A: It was important to remove that process entirely and continue the fraud and certify the fraud with no detractors on record. This effectively gives no standing for a SCOTUS ruling appeal! Understand this. If those two motions, even just one had successfully been voted EVEN IF THE MOTIONS were DENIED IN VOTE, this gives those who presented them with STANDING FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL LEGAL ARGUMENT BEFORE SCOTUS.
♦ Q4: Could this have been done some other way other than creating a crisis/protest?
A: Unlikely. In order to prevent those two motions, requires that speaker of the house, minority leaders, and the president of the congress (vice president of the United States: Pence), to NOT BE PRESENT IN THE CHAMBERS.
Once the capitol police and other “law enforcements agents” informed the speaker and these three other individuals, Pelosi UNILATERALLY UNDER EMERGENCY RULES, suspended the business of the congress. This protest was necessary. The crisis was created because there is no other way to suspend the business of certification UNILATERALLY. By creating a crisis invokes emergency procedures. No other circumstances other than war or mass simultaneous explosive diarrhea can create such unilateral speaker delivered suspension of the certification.
♦ Q5: Why did the motions, once that the speaker RECONVENED congress, move forward back again to the floor for votes? Why were members disallowed to even consider putting forward ANY motions to the floor in when the chamber business was reopened?
A: The Speaker initiated the NEW sessions under special emergency rules. These rules abandon and make it clear that the ONLY purpose of the new session was to EXPEDITE the certification and dismiss all prior regular session procedural rules. This is why those two motions to table votes to consider a debate and pause to the certifications of state vote electors never happened later that evening when the house business was reconvened!
♦ Q6: Other than new rules, emergency rules, what other peculiar things occurred when the speaker reconvened?
A: Members were allowed to “vote” in proxy, remotely, not being present. You can use your imagination about what conditions were placed on ALL members during this time to prevent anyone from “getting out of line”.
Also clearly, it was at THIS NEW SESSION that VP Pence, President of Congress, would also have no ability to even consider pausing the electoral certification, because there were no motions of disagreements on the matter. So, in a technical legal claim, he is correct that he had no constitutional authority to address any issues of fraud or doubts about electoral irregularities. But this completely dismisses the FACT that congress created rules in this crisis/emergency that never allowed them to be floored!
Understand what happened in Jan 6, 2021. Don’t get hung up on Viking impostors, stolen Pelosi computers, podium heists, and complicit capitol police. Understand the process and what happened and what WAS NOT ALLOWED TO HAPPEN.
This was a coup….it was a very organized and carefully planned coup. VP Pence without a doubt as well as most members of the house were quite aware of how the certification was going to be MANAGED. It would require new rules to prevent the debate clause from occurring! New rules that ONLY AN EMERGENCY CRISIS COULD CREATE! So, they created an emergency.
•NOTED: I understand why many people have great interest in debunking the j6 event. I get that. I think it is important to dissect and examine the events of that day but please, step back and understand WHY these things happened. Examine the chain of events in congress. Why those two motions that would have at least paused the certification THAT WOULD GIVE VP PENCE THE CONSTITUTIONALLY RECOGNIZED POWER TO MOVE TO SUSPEND THE ELECTORAL CERTIFICATION AND THEN EXAMINE THE IRREGULARITIES AND CLAIMS OF FRAUD!
At the very center of this coup stands Mike Pence, the same individual who also spoiled President Trump’s first opportunities in the earlies hours of his Presidency just 4 years prior, when he created and facilitated the removal of Lt General Michael Flynn. I will not spend much time on this thread explaining why Lt Gen Flynn was so important to President Trump and why the IC was so afraid he would have advisory power to the President. That I will leave for another day, another time. But understand this clearly: MIKE PENCE WAS AND IS WORKING FOR THE MOST CORRUPT CRIMINAL TREASONOUS PEOPLE IN GOVERNMENT.
•PRO TIP: If you really want to get a true understanding of this matter videos of protesters walking in the capitol is not going to address them. Actual video and timeline records of events and the specific actions taken by the speaker just moments before TWO MAJOR ELECTORAL ALTERING MOTIONS WERE ABOUT TO BE FLOORED.
This crisis was developed just in time with a precise coordination to prevent those two motions to be entered into the chamber record. The two motions do not exist. The emergency powers established in the new session made sure they never could be entered. The emergency powers could never happen without a crisis.
God Bless America!”
NOTE: “Under this scenario, the J6 pipe bombs were the insurance policy – in the event the feds couldn’t get the crowd to comply with the FBI provocations. If no one stormed the Capitol, the finding of the two pipe bombs would have then been the emergency needed to stop the process.” Which explains why the FBI has no interest in the DC pipe bomb suspects. ~ Sundance
Note from Author: “I started this effort years ago. To date, no one, and I mean no one, has replied. It’s as if everyone that can expose it that has a larger platform is either disinterested, or suspiciously withdrawn from the issue. I made several comments about this over the years right here at CTH, on article threads that are relevant to the topic.
I was watching the certification live that day. I recorded it ALL on every channel. I was doing this because no matter what happened that day, I KNEW IT WOULD BE A PROFOUND AND SIGNIFICANT EVENT TO REMEMBER. I never in my wildest imagination (and I have a pretty vivid imagination, always have), expected to see the unmistakable perfectly timed “coincidences” that occurred.
One member raises a motion (with another in waiting for his turn) those two motions were well known and advertised. These were motions to vote for a pause in the certification to examine electoral vote fraud and irregularities. I can’t speak to the veracity and substance of those motions. They were never allowed to even be floored. It was at that exact moment that the House chambers were suspended, and 4 of the key members, Pence, Pelosi, Schumer and McConnell were escorted OUT right after initiating the end of the session.
Effectively, this resulted in that motion never being floored at all. Then, when reconvened under special emergency rules, inexplicably those two motions (and perhaps more – we will never know – or will we?) were not even attempted to be motioned. That was not just peculiar to me.
It all started to make more sense when I did some study on constitutional law AND THE HISTORY of specific special authorities given to president of the Congress, Pence in this case. Not only did he have the authority and power to suspend the certification, but the duty to address the motion in the same sense that it becomes vital to the debate clause.
There really is no higher significance of weight given to the debate clause than the certification of the votes. This was more than odd to me the way that the media and Pence framed their narrative: Pence would not have the constitutional power to suspend certification. Then it hit me, like the obvious clue that was there all the time. He was right. But the reason he is right, is because there WAS NO MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO CAUSE HIM TO SUSPEND!
Understanding this happened for me about 4 or 5 months after this Jan 6 day. It took me this long to examine the facts, look at the video again, compare it to the arguments made by several leading constitutional academics, and again, inexplicably even some that I respect seemed to dodge that central reality. The motions were never allowed to be floored in the re-convened House rules later that evening. Most would not even venture to address the exotic coincidence that the moment those two members would stand to place the motion before the house, that the House Speaker Pelosi AND Pence ended the session – effectively blocking the motions from being heard in normal House rules.
It’s been a journey for me. A journey that was initiated because I am just a simple but curious person. Perhaps even to a point where I get obsessive in those efforts. Many days and nights combing over the details – praying and trying to make sense of what makes little sense. With over 6 states having serious well known and obvious defects in the voting process, some more credible to believe – some less, but one would not expect the house would be so deliberate in marching past the motions that were definitely going to be present to slow this process down and take the time to get it right. Even IF the claims never reached an intersection that would change the outcome.
There are two possibilities: Millions of people, against all the odds, hitting all-time records even past Obama and Clinton, voted for a naval gazing ambulatory pathological racist moron, and chose Joe Malarkey as their leader. Or this was a coup, a conspiracy, and a treasonously manipulated regime change, because President Trump could not be controlled by the deep state and globalists who OWN AND OPERATE WASHINGTON DC.
BOTH POSSIBILITIES ARE TERRIFYING.
The only way for THE PEOPLE to gain power in this country is to force the transfer of it. If truth isn’t the fuel and vehicle, we will just be replacing deck chairs and hitting the next series of expected ice bergs.
Knowing the truth is not enough; however, it is truth that makes it a righteous cause.
God Bless America!”
Sundance provides an addendum in support:
Julie Kelly – […] Just as the first wave of protesters breached the building shortly after 2 p.m., congressional Republicans were poised to present evidence of rampant voting fraud in the 2020 presidential election. Ten incumbent and four newly-elected Republican senators planned to work with their House colleagues to demand the formation of an audit commission to investigate election “irregularities” in the 2020 election. Absent an audit, the group of senators, including Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) pledged to reject the Electoral College results from the disputed states.
The Hail Mary effort was doomed to fail; yet the American people would have heard hours of debate related to provable election fraud over the course of the day.
And no one opposed the effort more than ex-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).
During a conference call on December 31, 2020, McConnell urged his Republican Senate colleagues to abandon plans to object to the certification, insisting his vote to certify the 2020 election results would be “the most consequential I have ever cast” in his 36-year Senate career.
From the Senate floor on the afternoon of January 6, McConnell gave a dramatic speech warning of the dire consequences to the country should Republicans succeed in delaying the vote. He downplayed examples of voting fraud and even mocked the fact that Trump-appointed judges rejected election lawsuits.
“The voters, the courts, and the States have all spoken,” McConnell insisted. “If we overrule them, it would damage our Republic forever. If this election were overturned by mere allegations from the losing side, our democracy would enter a death spiral.”
Roughly six hours later, McConnell got his way. Cowed by the crowd of largely peaceful Americans allowed into the building by Capitol police, most Republican senators backed off the audit proposal. McConnell, echoing hyperbolic talking points about an “insurrection” seeded earlier in the day by Democratic lawmakers and the news media, gloated. “They tried to disrupt our democracy,” he declared on the Senate floor after Congress reconvened around 8 p.m. “This failed attempt to obstruct Congress, this failed insurrection, only underscores how crucial the task before us is for our Republic.”
Congress officially certified the Electoral College results early the next day. (read more)
[ Support CTH Mission Here ]
The J6 pipe bombs were the insurance policy, in the event they couldn't get the crowd to comply with the FBI provocations. If no one stormed the Capitol, the finding of the pipe bombs would have been the emergency needed to stop the process. https://t.co/JqVcGROAPN
— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) March 12, 2023
“You might even call this the beta test for what lies ahead.”
You might even call this the beta test for
whatthe lies ahead.Great article by the commenter. But I notice that despite his detailed explanation, the names of the two members who were about to submit the motion before the crisis occurred are never revealed. Why?
If memory serves me correctly, I think Gates was one.
IIRC, a whole group had formed, an ad hoc caucus and initially announced their intentiins, Josh Hawkey was involved on the Senate side, presumably MTG and yes, Gaetz, and then Cruz stepped up, suggesting they call for a ten day postmonement, to ‘send it back to the States’ citing some historical precedent.
If your curious, you can undoubtedly research it to find the details.
In retrospect, if they were sincere, this caucus should have kept their mouths shut, as to their intentions, however I have serious doubts as to the sincerity of some of them, frankly.
C-Span recorded this live. It was quite a moment to see the GOP step up and do this legally after seeing the Democrats in 2016 do the exact same thing, but only for theater since none of them met the legal requirements like the GOP did in 2020.
Gaetz?
There are no motions permitted before the Joint Session of Congress. Those are the rules for the Joint Session. No motions. No votes. The names of those who OBJECT to the election results documented on the state governor’s Certificate of Ascertainment, ARE NAMED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE AND DOCUMENTED IN THE WRITTEN OBJECTION. I believe you were referring to a MOTION BEFORE THE JOINT SESSION. There are no motions made to the Joint Session. Only the objections are entertained.
You need to watch the process from 2021, which is still available on YOU TUBE. The Certificate of Ascertainment for ARIZONA was opened by Pence, who handed it to teller Amy Klobuchar. The Senator read the vote results for Arizona, followed by Pence inquiring about Objections. A Congressman reported the objection. Pence looked at the written objection, declared it a legitimate objection, and directed the Senate return to their chamber for the debate and vote on the objection.
NO MOTIONS.
NO VOTES.
I just checked this and found out that, in the Joint Sessions of Congress that resulted in DECLARATIONS OF WAR, the two houses of Congress conduct themselves in a similar way as in the Joint Session to count electoral votes. To vote up or down on War, the two houses meet in their separate chambers, just as in the case of objections during the Electoral Vote Count.
https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RL31133.html#_Toc419979177
.
I, for one, would really
like to see what was contained in that written objection from Dr. Paul Gosar from AZ.
Could any names contained in that writing have been ‘classified’ — as in the person named has multiple silos of information re: them, and to entertain his or her objection would result in too much information having to be revealed, thus, for ‘National security reasons’ this objection had to be squashed . . .?
Ted Cruz was among them. I thought there were 10 total. I may be wrong. I always wondered if the dissenters were also in on the coup. I didn’t watch any of it but knew it was a coup, using our own MAGA patriots against us.
C-Span recorded this. I watched it.
Saw replay yesterday on C-SPAN.
I surmise Alabama and Alaska were submitted unopposed; however, Arizona’s electors were challenged by House Rep. Paul Gosar. VP Pence then asked if the challenge was in writing (yes, it was). Pence then asked the crucial question of having a US Senator in agreement and up steps Ted Cruz. You could hear the caterwauling and boos in the background (probably McConnell and Romney).
At that point, Pence is no longer just an emcee, he now has to operate to address the challenge.
Pence, et al also know more challenges are likely forthcoming and that the certification will likely not occur on J6 – hence ‘Operation Rubber Bullets and Tear Gas’ with the backup ‘Operation Pipe Bomb’.
Ask a Moonbat, “If Pence was powerless on J6, why did the incoming Congress and the potted plant in the WH pass a law to redefine the role of the VP on Elector Voting Day?”
That’s an insult to potted plants—and I do NOT have a green thumb!
“Our Democracy” as the Democrats love to say.
I watched this live on C-Span – wasn’t one of them Tom Cotton?
It is in the video record.
All very legal. Unlike the 2016 attempts when Democrats just put on a show of objecting one by one, but none met the legal requirements to object.
Correction – Josh Hawley, not Tom Cotton, was one of them.
Yes they are Ted Cruz and Ron from Wisconsin since his last name runs away from memory.
I think Ted Cruz was one, wasn’t he?
we all know the Fascist Butthead Idiots with the deep state were involved…..that’s why they need to be abolished and rebuilt with TRUE patriots.
Just abolished PERIOD.
Better to eliminate all departments and functions not enumerated in the Constitution.
I’m sure that those who worked in deep state #1 would find their way into deep state #2 in matter of a few years.
“A: The crisis was created to eliminate the motion challenges to halt the certification and to begin voting to look into voting irregularities and fraud”
As pointed out in the earlier questions raised by regitiger, there are NO MOTIONS permitted in the Joint Session of Congress to count the Electoral Votes and formally declare the winner. Only OBJECTIONS are entertained after each CERTIFICATE OF ASCERTAINMENT’s results are read to the Joint Session by a teller after being opened by the President of the Senate. The Joint Session does not entertain motions. The Joint Session does not vote on anything. When there is an objection, the two houses retire to their respective chambers to debate about the motion and to vote. Two hours are permitted for this.
There is no understanding this Congressional Proceeding without understanding the Electoral Count Act and how it biases the procedures for the acceptance of the Certificates of Ascertainment sent to the President of the Senate and the National Archives by the governors of the States. The Constitution, by establishing the Electoral College, has stated that the STATES ELECT THE PRESIDENT, not the People by Popular Vote, and not the Congress. The Certificate of Ascertainment is supposed to reflect the results of the State vote. When Lincoln got elected, some States listed the names of the Electors for each candidate with the names of the candidates on the ballot.
After the Hayes-Tilden disputed election of 1876, and the subsequent passage of the Electoral Count Act, the aim of Congress has been to push the decision, in the event of an Objection, toward the Certificates of Ascertainment. That is the purpose of the “Safe Harbor” rule, and the “One House Rule.” Of the two, the “One House Rule” is very effective in maintaining the sanctity of the Certificates of Ascertainment. In the event of an Objection, as long as ONE HOUSE, in the course of the temporary suspension of the “Chamber Proceeding” for the two houses to debate and vote in each house’s OWN CHAMBER, if one house of Congress votes to uphold the Certificate of Ascertainment as representing the Electoral Votes of the State, then the Certificate of Ascertainment WINS. In 2021, that meant Biden was going to be chosen no matter what since the House of Representatives would vote for it every time. Ted Cruz even conceded this in the opening of his speech during the debate over the objection to the Arizona Certificate of Ascertainment IN THE SENATE CHAMBER. The Republicans wanted their objections, and supporting evidence, on the record. In an earlier reply to regitiger months ago, I provided links to the video of this debate of the US Senate on 1/6/2021. The video is still available.
Once those Certificates of Ascertainment are sent to the President of the Senate and the National Archives, there isn’t much that can be done to stop the candidate declared the winner on that Certificate from having their victory “certified” after the debate and vote and the reassembly of the Joint Session of Congress.
How this system works is further evidence that the use of the Joint Session of Congress to enforce the Enron Statute (18 USC 1512) is not legitimate as no COURT PROCEEDING operates like this Joint Session of Congress.
There were Democrats clamoring for “challenges” to the “certification” of Trump’s election that included the forming of protests in DC and all over the US. They made the error that the Joint Session is like the Democratic National Convention, and all these Senators and Representatives can act like party delegates to the convention, and move the election onto a “FLOOR VOTE,” eliminating the delegates’ pledging to an individual candidate for the nomination for President. That cannot happen under this system.
Again excellent reminder of how the system works, and to see one aspect of it in action, you can view the video of the certification of the 2000 results, when a woman representative objected, the Chair asked if any Senator would stand with her, none would and so her objection did NOT lead to an adjornment of the joint session.
Starting with Obama and the birther issue, we see how the elites do NOT take certification as more than a formality.
Each National party chair, writes 50 letters, to the 50 State SoS’s, asserting that “X” is their nominees for POTUS and VPOTUS, and ‘Certifying’ that they are qualified for the offices, and the SoS’s simply take their word for it.
The County Recorders ‘certify’ the results from their County (and as Mohave County was told by the Az. SoS, they have no choice but to do so) the SoS then ‘certifies’ them to the Gov. who then ‘Certifies’ them to the State Legislature, who then ‘certifies’ them to the Congress.
Its all for show, as it all amounts to “trust me, take my word for it”.
The last thing elected officials want, is anything that could erode the confidence of the voters in the process, (or so they SAY!) and yet thats exactly what they got.
<“Each National party chair, writes 50 letters, to the 50 State SoS’s, asserting that “X” is their nominees for POTUS and VPOTUS, and ‘Certifying’ that they are qualified for the offices, and the SoS’s simply take their word for it.”>
In my state (HI) the Chief Election Officer (no SoS here) makes a determination but
“If the applicant, or any other party, individual, or group with a candidate on the presidential ballot, objects to the finding of eligibility or disqualification the person may, not later than 4:30 p.m. on the fifth day after the finding, file a request in writing with the chief election officer for a hearing on the question. “
Is this analysis in the law in alignment with prof. John Eastman’s interpretation? I thought he said that there was precedence for challenging certification, in the event of fraud. ????
This IS how the law is applied, not just my analysis or interpretation. Even Jack Smith said there is a right to challenge the results of an election, and he can’t seem to apply statutes to his cases very well. This is done by written objections, which, in 2021, only required the signatures of one Representative and one Senator to be validated. Those objections are handled as I described, and is how it is described in the ELECTORAL COUNT ACT.
As to Mr. Eastman, he is not the only Constitutional scholar who thinks the Electoral Count Act is unconstitutional. I found that out in my research as I used a paper in which another constitutional attorney said he believed it was unconstitutional since the Congress votes on the objections, but does not send them on to the President for the President’s signature, among other reasons. That one sticks out. Eastman’s ideas have never been seriously addressed, but since he is not alone in them, they should be.
An interesting part of this is that Declarations of War are handled just like Objections in the Electoral Vote Count. The President addresses both Houses in Joint Session, and then they meet in their separate chambers to debate and vote. The votes for War are both signed by the President, so why not sign the decisions about the Objections in the Electoral Vote Count?
Another observation about the votes for war is how this reflects how Roman historian Tacitus described how German tribes governed themselves. When a tribal leader wanted a war with another tribe, or Rome, there was a meeting of the freemen with the leader. The freemen would bring their weapons to the meeting. If they agreed with the leader about a war, they would wave their spears. If they disagreed the freemen muttered to each other for awhile and raised objection. This is so much like our old militia system, it’s like that is from where we derived our own system, only dividing by States and not by clans or tribes.
https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RL31133.html#_Toc419979177
Not getting connection between Declarations of War, provided in USCONS Art I/8/11 and thus subject to the procedure of Art I/7/3, and election of President provided in Art II/1/3 as amended by Amdt XII.
Also worth reviewing R.S. 1874 Title III Chap 1 which codified the procedures prior to the enactment of the Electoral Vote Count Act. Sec 142 didn’t provide any specifics for Congress on how to conduct the joint session. That was left to the 22d Joint Rule of Congress.
Congress’ role in Presidential Election is an Art II power, not Art I (legislative).
Read twice. Thanks very much.
Glad it was helpful.
I have been aware of Regitiger’s brilliant analysis since the first time it was posted here. By the way, other than manipulating the video of the pipe bomber, wasn’t there some question about the timers used in those ‘bombs’…something like manual kitchen timers that potentially would have been impossible to set off remotely?? And did we not also see a video of someone near one of the bombs, in daylight hours, getting into an official car? Be that as it may:
But as I was reading this article today, I wondered….what would some of our Founding Father members have done in a similar situation? When coming back to Congress under ‘emergency rules’, would they, if they had issues with the certification, have just remained quiet and allowed the emergency session to continue undisturbed? Or would they have disrupted the emergency session, understanding that their objection to certification was of historical importance? What would have happened if they had ‘caused a scene’ by continuing with their objection, ignoring the ‘emergency’?? We will never know, of course, but I suspect that there would have been members who would decide that the legitimate questions regarding the election ‘outcome’ would be more important than abiding by Congressional ‘rules’.
I wholeheartedly agree. That is what made me wonder if the original crew was in on it because IT JUST DISAPPEARED into the ether.
Is this why Nancy Pelosi must stay in Congress? I’m sure she is the “ring leader” due to her vast knowledge of parliamentary procedure. She once called herself a “master legislator” and I believe she is correct. My belief is that she is the evil mastermind behind the entire J6 plot. None of the other conspirators have the brain power and knowledge of the procedures, along with the authority to carry the plan out to have pulled this off. She must be very proud of herself.
I hope she gets what is coming to her.
ditto
“I hope she gets what is coming to her.” SOON.
The cold hard fact is that Trump walked into a trap by calling for a rally of his supporters on Jan 6th.
Now, he’s called for a rally the day before the inauguration- bad idea…
I have always been struck by the tableau like appearance of that panoramic photo taken of the protesters on the capital steps and surrounding area that day. It was so obviously staged and orchestrated, just like in a movie production. (which we now know it was)
Recently President Trump asked “where is the scaffold commander?” This is the guy with a megaphone who was up on that high scaffold platform directing the people where to go and position themselves. He has never been identified.
President Trump KNOWS what they did! I just hope and pray that they ALL get exposed and are brought to justice!
May God have mercy and grant America another chance to return to her founding principles.
MAGA!
I believe the guy on the scaffolding yelling for everyone to come up closer to the Capitol was Ray Epps. As to the “staging” of the people on the Capitol steps, everyone wanted to be near the steps and the Capitol – that was the whole purpose of the protest – to make sure everyone there (and people watching on TV) saw how many people were on Trump’s side.
If the fedsurrectionists can blur the faces of the agents involved, can they not also substitute the faces of those they want to accuse of doing the dirty deeds?
Yes. The very basis of AI used to create memes.
I believe they have already done this, in their faux trials against the J6 hostages.
.
The ‘meemaw’ (as she was affectionately dubbed by ‘frees’) — whose picture was splattered over and over, carrying a small American flag and some kind of drinking apparatus — seriously looks like a composite of a mother daughter duo I am familiar with . . .
I have asked this before: was this woman ever charged and convicted?
If so, what are the details?
If not, is it due to the ‘fact’ that this person does not exist as pictured, and thus, not even in the Capitol on J6?
Its apparent what was done, who did it, and why. MY chief concern are the January 6th victims still in jail, threatened with jail, and families who has lost pretty much everything by this cruel joke on humanity. Release the kraken, feed him the guilty and may Liz Cheney be the first victim.
I agree the J6 victims should be pardoned immediately on Trump’s first day in office. I also think we cannot let this go. It was a coup d’etat, the overthrow of our government and therefore it is treason and the people responsible need to pay the price so that this never happens again. It is our duty.
Tony Seruga on X
——————————————-
Tony Seruga
@TonySeruga
My partners and I have been lifetime data scientists. We own the digital ID of every mobile device/computer in the U.S. and have indexed and archived every IP address in the world. Our extensive experience in big and deep data, including geotracking and geolocation makes our dozens of data companies the top authority for providing data to corporations, law enforcement and U.S. government agencies like the CIA, NSA, DoD, DIA, NGA, NRO, FBI, as well as Interpol and foreign intelligence organizations.
There are a number of videos documenting these ghost buses as well as a number of mostly nondescript DOJ vans that dropped off ninja wearing individuals that appear in other videos to have breached the Capitol cutting fencing, removing barricades, opening doors, and other nefarious behaviors.
We also tracked the infamous J6 ‘pipe bomber’ from one of these vans. Later, we eventually tracked them to a Virginia Metro station where a perfect capture of their vehicle license plate was made.
The FBI has ALL of this information. Shortly after they were alerted, however, AT&T mysteriously ‘accidentally’ corrupted that and only that particular cell phone user’s data.
Additionally, their mobile device was used hundreds of times before and after J6 accessing keycard required DOJ/FBI parking garages and buildings.
The blurring of images was already available. Google uses it in their Google Street Views to blur out faces and license plates.
Chris Wray says it’s just too hard to convict mask wearers. Of course that was the plan when they mandated masks for all. I knew exactly what was coming.
Four years. They had four years to plan it all out.
Statement by Secretary Jeh Johnson on the Designation of Election Infrastructure as a Critical Infrastructure Subsector
Release Date: January 6, 2017
https://www.dhs.gov/archive/news/2017/01/06/statement-secretary-johnson-designation-election-infrastructure-critical
The real anniversary we should be talking about was J6, 2017. Eight years ago.
Why didn’t the members that did not get their chance to make a motion speak up at the time or shortly thereafter? They should have made an issue out of it.
Should have. But they didn’t. That tells you everything. SPIT!!!
That is what happens when you have a corrupt congress.
Demonized into silence.
Anyone breathing a word contrary to Pelosi’s wishes was risking destruction as a Nazi sympathizer.
The entire Derp State and MarxMerdia went insane and those doing the right thing were scorned in to fearful silence.
The only other person I have listened to who shares this opinion is Dan Bongino.
There are others, but you may not have listened to them yet or seen their writings.
And IIRC, being a steady listener to Bongino’s podcasts for several years beginning just before he first moved to Rumble, it took Dan Bongino several years to finally come to his strong opinions about J6. He was very cautious – almost mum- for a few years until he raised the pipe bomb topic in early 2024 and brought it up repeatedly until the election in November.
Before January 2024, I only recall Dan discussing details and implications of the Fedsurrection itself and the pipe bomb anomalies – in August 2022 after Revolver News released a report on it raising serious questions.
On Jan 6th, I reminded my family members that this was the Anniversary of the Coup. I reminded them that Ashli Babbett was shot by the government. That a grandmother was beat to death by the government. I reminded them to never forget what happened that day.
It still boggles the mind that we allowed such a thing to occur. But, “they” had us with their conniving intricate well planned out challenge and their subsequent imprisonment of the “paraders”. The government showed that they can arrest, jail, and abuse any of us at any time.
The effect of their tyranny will last a long time. We have not forgotten what our own government has done. And while we did not take up arms against our ruthless and unjust government, we may in the future. Trump is our hope that civil war (and world war) can be averted, but as Sundance has pointed out, the surveillance state is even more in play now with the tech bros joining Trump.
I wonder, as an aside, statiscally speaking, how many more firearms (as a percentage to “normal”) were purchased after the Coup. I wonder how many more children were pulled from government schools to be home schooled. I wonder how many people decided to seriously consider a more “self-sufficient” lifestyle. There was a profound change and I’m just not sure if it can be quantified. But, I know for sure, there still exists an undercurrent of rebellion.
You are confusing your victims. A grandmother was beat, but not to death. A woman was beat to death and trampled on, Rosanne Boyland, but she was single and not a grandmother.
Thank you. I stand corrected. It was horrific – all of it.
I think what surprises me more than anything, is that “our” members of Congress who legitimately wanted an audit never raised public awareness of how Congress itself stole the 2020 election results.
Are the members of Congress blind, ignorant or just sheep that are easily led by the conspirators? Not one ever came to the microphones to talk about the theft, and the irregularities across the states.
Do they know less about the parliamentary procedures, or are they just cowed into submission easily?
I think you know which theory is the correct one – as we all do.
The front doors of the Capitol citadel weigh 20 tons. Additional such doors protect the only entrance to the two Chambers. There are gun-slits. In short, there is no possible way for “enemy invaders” to gain access.
Yes, it was a coup. And look what it did to the country …
And yet, the “perps” are all still there.
Were the emergency session rules new, or is this something from Congressional rules that has existed for a long time?
I would love to see somebody make a documentary outlining the timeline of the treason that day.
.
Nanzi Pelosi’s daughter had a film crew there that day, with who knows how much footage.
Maybe we should ask her (Christine, IIRC) for all her ‘evidence’ . . .
Assuming Bondi and Kash make it through confirmation, will they address this? Cannot rely on ‘No Johnson’ Johnson to investigate.
This was an awesome read! I’ve known this for a long time….without knowing some of these specific details that are quite amazingly put together here to give you the picture of TRUTH that some still need see……clearly!
Between this site and Revolver with Darren Beaty who has also been hot on this topic from the beginning and digging deeper than any other journalist. Thank God we still have these great truth seekers bringing us this information and the access to it!
A documentary needs to be made about this and made available to the entire nation.
May this be the last anniversary celebrated before the total and complete destruction of the FBI.
Here! Hear!
I would posit that Palantir is a technology and all technology is prone to hacking. Assuming white-hat hackers truly exist, there may be a slim possibility someone could breach the system and undo or reveal who the J6PB was…?
While the FBI had to be in on the cover-up there is a very good chance that the J6 coup was organized using DOD assets.
https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-inside-militarys-secret-undercover-army-1591881
Bookmarked for posterity.
Thank you Regitiger (nice palindrome) and Sundance.
He’s a tiger coming and going!
The blurring may obscure the identities, but they also highlight individuals considered important to the regime. It may be possible to get a real count of how many were actually there.
Side by Side exact timelines with video please.
I have been saying for a long time-
There are a whole lot of people in both houses of Congress who need to be arrested and charged with sedition.
They did not uphold the oath they swore when they took office.
Does anybody the song in that clip? The beginning part is not bad.
‘If truth isn’t the fuel and vehicle, we will just be replacing deck chairs and hitting the next series of expected ice bergs.’
Some might say:
Close. But in reality, we are debating the deck chairs arrangements and the deck hands pecking order, while the ship is unstoppably sinking.
The runaway sovereign debt and money printing will sink it regardless of who is in the WH.
A major war directly involving the deindustrialized US seems to be the Plan to scuttle the ship, “resolving” the debt in the process, with the deindustrialized nation forced to capitulate and accept permanent vassal state terms under totalitarian control.
Come out from amongst the trees and behold the forest. All the tea leaves align.
Thanks Sundance and Retigiger for the excellent article that exposes the successful coup plot that McConnell, Pelosi, Pence, et al executed to steal the election from Trump and stop democracy in its tracks.
The morning of January 6 Congressman Jim Jordan made a statement: “… Over 200 affidavits and declarations of wrongdoing, but no investigation in the Congress. No subpoenas, no depositions, no chance for question, or cross-examination of witnesses. Why? Why won’t they look into it? Why no hearings? Why no investigation? I think it’s because deep down, deep down, they know there were big problems with this past election. They know the Constitution was violated. Article one, Section Four: “Time, place, and manner for holding elections shall be determined in each state by the legislature thereof’. Article two, Section One: “Each state shall appoint in such manner as the [State] Legislature may direct.” Look at Pennsylvania. Look at Pennsylvania.”…”
TheGatewayPundit had an article the morning of January 6 which included several key texts from President Trump calling for VP Pence to act under his Constitutional powers:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/today-matter-minutes-vice-president-will-become-known-history-hero-traitor-will/
“If Vice President @Mike_Pence comes through for us, we will win the Presidency. Many States want to decertify the mistake they made in certifying incorrect & even fraudulent numbers in a process NOT approved by their State Legislatures (which it must be). Mike can send it back!”
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 6, 2021
“States want to correct their votes, which they now know were based on irregularities and fraud, plus corrupt process never received legislative approval. All Mike Pence has to do is send them back to the States, AND WE WIN. Do it Mike, this is a time for extreme courage!”
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 6, 2021
Attorney John Eastman acted as a legal advisor to President Trump during the controversy over the 2020 election. This was a demonstration of courage, because the legal profession, with all the morality of a pack of rabid weasels, viciously and systematically attacks any lawyer who defends Trump. During the post-election period, law firms were threatened with economic ruin and even physically threatened.
In regard to the January 6th counting of Electoral College ballots, Eastman makes the case that “the ‘President of the Senate’ has the exclusive constitutional authority to determine which “certificates” to “open” and thus which electoral votes “to be counted.” … “Andrew McCarthy’s claim in a January 8 article in The Hill that “what the president pressured [Vice President Pence] to do was blatantly lawless” is therefore quite inaccurate [a big lie], though it has certainly been regurgitated repeatedly by the media.”
“In other words, the vice president was not being asked to decide the matter himself, but to pause the proceedings long enough to give the couple of states whose legislators had asked for more time to assess whether the illegal conduct by their state election officials—illegal conduct that Pence himself twice acknowledged in his statement—was sufficient to warrant revoking the existing certification and submitting a new one that accurately reflected the state’s vote, just as Hawaii had done in 1960. ”
“The difficulty was that the existing slates of electors had not been certified after an election conducted “pursuant to [the states’] own laws.” Pence was simply being asked to provide the state legislatures in the contested states with the time necessary to properly assess the legitimacy of their electoral votes.”
Legislatures in Pennsylvania, Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and others sent letters to Congress similar to the letter from Arizona stating, “based upon the clear and convincing nature of the evidence [of illegality and fraud], we respectfully ask that you recognize our desire to reclaim Arizona’s Electoral College Electors and block the use of any Electors from Arizona until such time as the controversy is properly resolved through the pending litigation or a comprehensive forensic audit.” In a January 4 letter, 21 members of the Pennsylvania Senate, including the powerful president pro tem of the Senate, outlined the numerous instances of violations of state law by state election officials and even the judiciary in the conduct of Pennsylvania’s election, thereby usurping the sole power that the Legislature has pursuant to Article II of the federal constitution to determine the manner for choosing presidential electors. Because of those illegal actions, the Senators noted “that PA election results should not have been certified” and asked that the Congress “delay certification of the Electoral College to allow due process as we pursue election integrity in our Commonwealth.”
https://americanmind.org/memo/setting-the-record-straight-on-the-potus-ask/
There is a saying that “there are no accidents.” Here is one case in point where Dr. Fauci’s coronavirus/covid bioweapon was released from the Wuhan lab just in time to cause states’ executives, bureaucrats, and judges to unconstitutionally change their election procedures to open the door wide for mail-in ballots. This was the key to the 2020 election steal. No matter that millions of Americans had to die in the process. And this article does not even address the issue of the millions who were killed or injured by the experimental covid vaccines.
Dr. Andrew Huff: Coronavirus Timeline ‘Giant Scandal to Subvert’ Trump
https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2025/01/04/exclusive-dr-andrew-huff-coronavirus-timeline-giant-scandal-to-subvert-trump/
Officials knew about the coronavirus breakout in the fall of 2019 — sooner than they claim — and the biotechnology used to create the virus developed in the U.S. and was then exported to China.
“So what we really have here is a giant scandal to subvert the President of the United States at the time: Donald Trump,” Huff said.
“So what the heck were all these Pentagon and intelligence officials doing? Why wasn’t the president notified? And really, you know, you step back and said, look at what is this. It’s treason.
“At best, Dr Fauci is guilty of 25 million counts of negligent criminal homicide. So they knew that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was a leaky lab, but they allowed the research to go on. They illegally exported the technology. They didn’t have the proper safety controls in place from a risk management perspective on the United States side and with the contractors involved with this research,” he said, adding, “And on top of it, you’re giving advanced biotechnology to an enemy of the United States.”
“All of this is illegal. … So in U.S. law, if the president issues a pardon to someone, and the person accepts the pardon, it’s an admission of guilt of the crimes. And if you look at all the individuals involved with the cover up, the export of this technology, that is a violation of the RICO Act.
Absolutely astonishing and clearly rings that bell of truth. An absolute COUP performed by both sides of the aisle.
These parliamentary tactics are used by the establishment all the time. Understanding Roberts rules is key.
Any motion from the floor can be ruled out of order by the chair. That may or may not be allowed. To stop the chair, someone must call “point of order” and challenge the chairs ruling. The chair then contemplates his/her ruling and rules on the point of order. “Point Well Taken or Point Not Well Taken” Depending on whether it requires a suspension or change to the rules the chairs final ruling might require a 60% vote to override.
That 60% vote was unlikely to happen so no motions were introduced knowing they would not stand.
My initial thought on J6 as it was happening was that it was BLM and Antifa instigating the riot. I learned in Dec 2021 from Steve Bannon’s show with Darren Beatty that it was instigated by the Feds. When I first heard it and read his stories I was certain some mainstream news outlet would pick it up and it would be the biggest scandal in US History. But no.
It wasn’t until years later that Bannon and Navarro explained the full reason for the FEDSURRECTION as described in this piece. And I just heard yesterday Bannon describe the pipe bomb as the backup plan. Beatty had been talking about it for years, but yesterday was when I fully understood it to be the backup plan.
This whole thing is a treasonous coup. I’d love to find out who was the Mastermind.
At this point, it doesn’t matter who the mastermind was. The main point is how much damage was done to this country during those four years we’ve lost forever.
Great analysis. Second time i’ve read it.
It should be published.
New book out on the real events on J6. I wonder if this is included.
Since we now know just how well thought out this whole plan was – and how those innocent Jan. 6-ers were just led to the slaughter, I hope that one of the first things Trump does is to FREE THOSE INNOCENT PEOPLE who have been imprisoned for 4 years under very harsh conditions and that they can sue the government for those lost 4 years of their lives!
I remember Paul Gosar and Ted Cruz ( Congress/Senate reps) as the first pairing asking for certification delay. Just getting ready were Josh Hawley and ? as the second of 3 required pairs…when the procedure was criminally halted.
Ron Johnson.
cross posted at https://freedomaustralia.freeforums.net/thread/6578/fedsurrection-anniversary-day