In an effort to keep the Daily Open Thread a little more open topic we are going to start a new daily thread for “Presidential Politics”. Please use this thread to post anything relating to the JoeBama Administration and Presidency.
“This is no small thing, to restore a republic after it has fallen into corruption. I have studied history for years and I cannot recall it ever happening. It may be that our task is impossible. Yet, if we do not try then how will we know it can’t be done? And if we do not try, it most certainly won’t be done. The Founders’ Republic, and the larger war for western civilization, will be lost.”
“But I tell you this: We will not go gently into that bloody collectivist good night. Indeed, we will make with our defiance such a sound as ALL history from that day forward will be forced to note, even if they despise us in the writing of it.”
This thread will refresh daily and appear above the Open Discussion Thread.
Whenever the possibility presents, throw sand into the machinery…
Posted in Uncategorized
-Supreme Court rules Donald Trump immune from criminal prosecution when it comes to constitutional powers.
-The Supreme Court delivers yet another blow to the power of the administrative state, ruling 6-3 that the six year window to sue federal agencies begins when the plaintiff experiences damages due to their actions.
Immunity only extends to powers, not to all acts. The Court sent the case back down to determine which acts were official acts and which were unofficial.
The case is NOT over.
Insuring an election is fair is an official act.
So say you, and I agree.
Unfortunately, that needs to be determined by the lower court.
And thank you, Wethal, for being tenacious in correcting/clarifying all the posts this morning!
And when the lower court rules (wrongly) that they’re personal acts and not official, President Trump will immediately appeal that BS.
That’s likely what will happen.
ICYMI…
Supreme Court Rules President Trump Has Absolute Immunity for Official Actions Within Constitutional Authority
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/07/01/supreme-court-rules-president-trump-has-absolute-immunity-for-official-actions-within-constitutional-authority/
100% +++++++++++
Free & Fair for ALL Citizens is our right.
As is our right to be self governed.
Well that’s not how the Democrats, Uniparty, deep state and IC will see it! They will claim President Trump’s acts were efforts to rig an election which isn’t an official act!!! Good grief this ruling just drags out any real end to Lawfare’s effort to imprison President Trump!!! The Supreme Corrupt Court rulings never settle anything it seems!!! If they can let Narvarro and Bannon go to jail it wouldn’t surprise me if they let President Trump go to jail pending lower court rulings!!! JMO
Period. End of story.
Yes, but SCOTUS didn’t say what specific official acts the president can do to ensure a fair election. That’s what the Court kicked back down to Chutkan in the district court.
President Trump’s DNI publically addressed the findings of Russia and Iran having access to voter registration rolls.
official duty – immune
It extends to “official acts” but not to unofficial acts.
If Trump formally ordered declassification of those documents, they are declassified.
👍🦁👑
This was the J6 case in DC, not the FL MAL documents case, although it may have some application to MAL.
Hello! It’s a Supreme Court decision. Check with a lawyer and they will tell you it effects any case prosecuting the President of the United States!
You seem to be a Doubting Thomas on anything positive for President Trump???
And that is all that matters.
11″ binder – The PRIZE!
According to Sotomayor it’s over…
In a blistering dissent, Justice Sotomayor writes that the ruling “makes a mockery of the principle, foundational to our constitution and system of government, that no man is above the law.”
“Relying on little more than its own misguided wisdom… the court gives former President trump all the immunity he asked for and more.”
…..so sez Claribel….
‘Wide Latina’ is narrow minded 🙂
Or ‘sorta mayor’?
🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
The “Latina” isn’t Latin just like John Kerry isn’t Irish!
Tops, again, WORDMAN. Thanks.
🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
She is so full of siht. Wise Latina my ash.
Didn’t
Earn
It
TDS addled not so wise latina also says “our democracy”
It IS a win. The dissenters have no respect for the Constitution and the rule of law.
Correct. SCOTUS essentially punted on this. I always thought immunity was a strange play, considering how weak the merits of the case are. Trump didn’t do anything illegal in the first place, making the immunity question moot. The lower court is just going to say these were not “official acts or the exercise of constitutional powers” (I would argue they were) and thus immunity doesn’t apply.
SCOTUS didn’t leave much wiggle room for that, but if lower court does so interpret, then Trump appeals and SCOTUS shoots down. And I think we’re past the election now, and Smith is sending out resumes
Sure it is. We got everything we wanted.
Wethal we got your point the first, second and third time but this is a big win for us.
A Presidents core power is also investigating election integrity which is what the un appointed smith and the DOJ are trying to torpedo.
It’s all over. The SC is just stretching the entire process out.
In other words if the POTUS is driving home from a friend’s wedding drunk and runs over a school crossing guard holding up the big STOP sign…No immunity.
Just about everything else he does…Absolute Immunity because he is PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!
Specifically covered PDJT J6 speech too!
Praise Jesus!
On no,….. another Massive SCOTUS loss for the Marxist Left Dims. Trump breezing by again – “Meep Meep!
Guess Obama/Biden/Pelosi/Schmuckey will now deploy their Fascist tactics of sending their PantyFa/BLM militant wing into the streets tonight to scream at the sky “Burn This B*tch Down” and ‘protest’ like their Komrades in France did last night.
After the Marxist Dim’s “Summer of Love 2.0 ” tantrum tonight, the Voters sentiments will be “We can’t wait to vote President Trump back in to rid America of this Marxist scourge!”
Get your popcorn ready.
Yuh this is a big possibility
Mon Dieu!
I say we hit some auntiFA with tranquilizer darts, capture them, interrogate them with enhanced techniques, learn about the hierarchy, then dose them with some Xanax prior to returning them to the wild. ..
Noice!
Obama/Biden/Pelosi/Schmuckey can scream whatever they have been screaming. They will always light their political prairie (deeply buried in BS) fires. They are still running with furs alight and smoldering; aided along as usual by the same mainstream media’s BS shovellers who aren’t rocked somuch by the truth of the situation but by the unmasking of the major part they have entrenched themselves in the contemptible, confabulating tools they are. Immediately following along is the lon …ng list of the usual and new opinion-shapers, campaign donors, political celebrities, Beltway gamblers ….
Just look at Joe Biden!
Joe Biden … IS the walking potent symbol of the Ruling Class’ impotence
WHY Are There about 10 WHITE 66 passenger Buses sitting in a Parking Lot in NW INDIANA
( with DOT Numbers … )
pre Positions ?
Did you find out anything about these buses? I haven’t seen anything on the news but would also like to know. Hopefully it’s not just more illegal invaders.
“Just win baby WIN”
BIG WIN FOR OUR CONSTITUTION AND DEMOCRACY. PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN!
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/112711754312482501
“As for the dissents,” Roberts writes, “they strike a tone of chilling doom that is wholly disproportionate to what the Court actually does today–conclude that immunity extends to official discussions between the President and his Attorney General, and then remand to the lower courts to determine ‘in the first instance’ whether and to what extent Trump’s remaining alleged conduct is entitled to immunity.”
Guess who the three dissenters were. Neither Jackson nor Sotomayor used the traditional “I respectfully dissent.” They left out “respectfully.”
Hopefully Roberts’ comments set the tone for the lower court when it gets around to determining what is official vs unofficial acts.
Do you know if these were the last 3 cases from this term, or were there a few more to have their rulings published today?
Term is over.
Thanks. Phew.
It’s worded to give the lower courts cover to save face.
And………I believe it is worded to give the Supreme Court cover to save face while not giving a definitive answer.
Seems they are just kicking the can down the road. DC judges will say President Trumps actions in regard to Jan 6 were unofficial and then it will be kicked right back to the politically fearful and intimidated SCOTUS. If SCOTUS is leaving it up to the DC courts to determine what is official vs unofficial it seems just another lawfare scam.
True. And then another appeal.
It’s a losing case to begin with. Smith wanted headlines and a trial before the election. This is a death blow to the DC case.
The burden to prove official v. unofficial is a very big hurdle given the broad powers a President has. Plus findings state personal papers and conversations cannot be used.
IMO the SC recognized and slapped down JS and DC courts political prosecution and their unprecedented haste to fast track his case to trial. That’s why they’ve been verbally critical of Judge Cannon. Now there’s zero chance for JS to get any trial before election.
Dummy, Scummy (Jackson), and Frumpy. Nauseating hacks.
Sotomayor and Jackson aren’t qualified to be judges, much less Supreme Court justices. At least Ginsberg had the intellect, however misguided.
Love my President
🙏💕🦁👑
Bret Weinstein – The West May Not Be Salvageable (6:12)
31 Jun 2024
Full interview:
I Can’t Overstate How Dire This Is | Bret Weinstein (1:01:43)
The Rubin Report
It was cut off when he started talking about what’s coming.
Thank you
That’s why I posted a link to the full video.
Thank you
I do not believe there is a “June 31” unless our confused faux president has declared one in an executive order this morning.
I’ll be going on vacation until Sept 31.
He is a crackpot. Don’t waste your time listening to him. He comes at everything from his background as an evolutionary biologist. He sees the West and culture generally through that godless lens. That should tell you all you need to know about him and his theories and predictions. We are all just evolving bugs in a jar to him.
I don’t think so – I think he, like Naomi Wolf, and even Richard Dawkins, are starting to wake up and recognize that the only Society worth protecting and defending is one that is based on the judeo Christian model of the Bible. It is a very difficult thing to make that final step into accepting the reality that there is a God who created and controls the universe but I see many, many people inching further and further toward that realization.
And Jordan Peterson. All cultures are NOT equal.
The British Army vs the Zulus!
I would say that the only society that is worth protecting is one that is based on the Christian model in the Bible. Not judeo Christian. Christian. American Christians would do well to get their heads out of the Old Testament and focus soley on Christ’s message. All one needs to know about the Old Testament is in the first few lines of John. The West is Christian. Without Christianity there is no West.
Exactly!
All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, correcting and training in righteousness (i.e. being right with God)
2 Timothy 3:16
Frankly, I’d be far, FAR more impressed by a God who created the universe in a Big Bang knowing that 13.7 billion years later there would be humans evolving from that mess than one who goes “abracadabra” and there’s us and everything else.
That’s why I don’t dispose of evolutionary science off-hand. We evolved from apes and, unfortunately, retain far too many of their worst flaws in our human nature.
I read with amusement when it was determined that chimps didn’t get their murderous, warring nature from human exposure as previously theorized.
I also laughed when on a documentary about one of our closest relatives, orangutans, the husband in the expert couple famous for studying them was asked, to paraphrase, “So, you must really like them to spend so much time with them,” to which he replied, once again paraphrasing, “No, they’re cruel, vindictive creatures.” Thus describing the fundament sinfulness of human beings, no?
Are People Born Good? (5:13)
Dennis Prager
PragerU
“I’d be, ” meaning “I WOULD be,” rather than “I am”? The thought that logically precedes that sentence is “IF I believed in God …”
@ Winston. I agree that science and religion can and should coexist. There are so many unknowns in science that the door remains wide open for a “higher power” and a set of underlying rules that determine the “goodness” of an outcome vs the alternative (chaos).
The premise of atomic theory is that 99% of everything is empty space, and Quantum Mechanics shows that the remaining 1% that is there is only there “on average” and flickers in and out of existence.
It seems to me the universe is a system of concepts that build upon what came before towards a structure that works even “better” than what came before.
It also leads to bad results (ie Marxism, gender dysphoria and a host of other poor outcomes) but over time goodness always seems to prevail. (Even if sucks to be us during these correctional periods)
The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, they do abominable deeds; there is none who does good.
Psalm 14:1
fjb and his horrible family are career criminals with long ties to org. crime, he will look out for number one like he always has. He will NEVER resign
https://neiliabiden.com/
Some interesting history here of FJB and associates. What a bunch of scum we have in DC…liars, thieves, and worse.
Have no idea who put this together. The author is not a Trumper.
FJB may not resign, but the $64,000 question is whether he will still be the candidate on the ballot in November. If Michael Obama gets onto the ticket, it makes it a lot easier for the demonrats to steal the election with less suspicion that the demonrats stole the election from Trump TWICE. In 2024 the demonrats may need more than the 139% voter turnout in Detroit and 350% voter turnout in other places in Michigan, and more than 100% voter turnout in Wisconsin and Arizona to “win” again.
So can FJB pardon himself and his entire family and business associates before he leaves office?
She’s to self absorbed in her own stuff to be pushed down a path to run for president. She DOES NOT LIKE TO WORK. Period. Never going to happen.
Agreed; that said, does Biden “work”? If the job is that she gets to swan round, delivering speeches written for her to adoring, hand-picked audiences, while the same band of Marxist policy-makers actually running the country continue doing the actual work, she might go for it.
Turley- Reading through this opinion, I don’t see how there isn’t cardiac arrest for the special council
Video:
https://t.me/realKarliBonne/252505
Senator Rand Paul on SCOTUS decision
Video:
https://t.me/realKarliBonne/252504
It means the case goes back down for hearings in front of Chutkan on what is an official act and what is an unofficial act. Then there will likely be a petition for another appeal to the DC Circuit of her opinion (you know how she’ll rule), and another petition for cert.
Result: case drags on beyond the election. Get to 1/20/25, and President Trump orders the case dismissed.
President Trump can’t order the case dismissed, but if it lingers past his re-inauguration it may be dismissed as moot. Their real goal is to prevent Trump in the WH.
He can order the attorney general to dismiss it. The DOJ is part of the executive branch, But yes, my wording was inaccurate.
This drives home the point that the O’Biden WH is behind the persecution of President Trump. Or at least has the power to stop it.
There’s also the question of Jack Smith’s legitimacy in having the authority to even bring this case. The answer, on its face, appears to be no. So it may not matter what Trump does.
Thomas, in his concurrence, essentially told Aileen Cannon to rule on that point before any trial begins. The dismissal with prejudice should have about 15 independent reasons, any one of which is sufficient.
He can order his attorney general to dismiss and take ONE up on the Obiden crime family.
Their real goal is to prevent Trump in the WH.
How desperate will Obama and the deep state get as President Trump keeps getting stronger? Now that FJB has taken a nose-dive, it puts more pressure on banana republic judge Merchan to throw President Trump in prison on July 11 so that he can’t be out on the campaign trail this summer and fall.
Interesting. Guess this whole case will continue throughout the summer.
Speaking of cardiac arrest. Did Carville ever surface after the Residential Rumble the other night?
More analysis.
https://rumble.com/v54vdel-breaking-supreme-court-prepares-to-make-major-ruling.html?e9s=rel_v1_a
Of course, Amy Coney Barrett had to disagree with something (she thinks that it should be allowable for a jury to be presented with official presidential acts as evidence of crimes having been committed).
I think she’s off here. If it’s an official act, then there is immunity. Every official act of a president could be open to later criminal prosecution, under this reasoning.
But she did vote with the majority, so I’ll give her that.
She’s just off. Another SCROTUS bad pick by Republicans. When was the last time the Dems put a justice on the SCROTUS who turned out to be a conservative in liberal clothing?
there are alot of snakes walking amongst us as friendlies.
the level of corruption we have in our branches of government makes it ‘almost guaranteed’ they get their person in position every time. same with judge selections. I can’t figure the screw up they did to get Chutkan
Yes, trashing the first amendment along with her crew (Sotomayor and Kagan) was a pretty bad look.
Sotomayor calls Trump’s actions treasonous
JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, with whom JUSTICE KAGAN and JUSTICE JACKSON join, dissenting. Today’s decision to grant former Presidents criminal immunity reshapes the institution of the Presidency. It makes a mockery of the principle, foundational to our Constitution and system of Government, that no man is above the law. Relying on little more than its own misguided wisdom about the need for “bold and unhesitating action” by the President, ante, at 3, 13, the Court gives former President Trump all the immunity he asked for and more. Because our Constitution does not shield a former President from answering for criminal and treasonous acts, I dissent.
Neither Jackson nor Sotomayor used the traditional “I respectfully dissent.” They left out “respectfully.”
They are commies….therefore they respect nothing.
They have to do what their owners demand. Remember schmuky schumer already warned them.
Speaking as a retired FEMALE attorney, I’m so tired of these emotional women who can’t think straight.
I started practicing law in 1977, and it pains me to think of all the digs and insults we women attorney put up and still had to be “professional” at all times. And this is what the next generation is doing?
.
The problem isn’t women — or minorities. It’s affirmative action that boosted mediocrity based on the identity politics. Clapclapclapclap…
.
That’s what we get in a country that believes ethnicity, party and gender are the primary criteria for a Supreme Court nomination. If they were pragmatic critical thinkers, their party would not have nominated them.
But that’s why that party exists.
sDee: Pragmatic and critical thinking are now exclusion criteria for judicial positions.
President Reagan decided that sex would be the criteria for a Justice, and managed not to pick a low mental woman.
One of the three doesn’t know what a woman is. That’s not emotion.
Those 3 together don’t have the intelligence of one of the other Justices. Gives female judges a bad look.
They sound Political and butt hurt to me.what if the next President was Democrat Then this would absolutely show their biases
Although the US Constitution doesn’t Condone Fascist Tactics by a Tyrannical Potus,…. they won’t care.
If she understood the Constitution she would recognize that there is a process to hold presidents accountable under the law. Hint, it isn’t lawfare.
“the Court gives former President Trump all the immunity he asked for”. That’s an odd way of saying it.
He either had immunity or he didn’t. They didn’t “give” him anything.
Good catch.
Trump’s statement to FOX on SCOTUS ruling:
45-47 statement to Fox digital
Video:
https://t.me/realKarliBonne/252508
The only problem is PDJT may not be 45-47.
Let’s go back in time. Who benefitted from Hilary losing? –> the shadow president for life, Barry Soetoro. Hilary thought they would help push her over into the Oval Office, I believe she thought there was fraud because there was suppose to be in her favor. Barry got rid of the Clintons by not helping her win. They knew they could knee cap Trump with deep state tactics. They thought they would be able to get rid of him, but fortunately for us Trump is pretty good at navigating the swampy waters, albeit not perfect.
Who wins by having Joe stay in the race and lose? –> again Barry Soetoro. They just knee cap Trump some more and prepare Joe 2.0 for 2028. It’s long term power for Barry, I think he probably believes Trump won’t be able to permanently change the course of Barry’s longterm goals (who knows what those are).
What else does Trump wining in 2024 do? –> it allows heat to be taken off of the “election fraud” narrative. People won’t be watching as much in 2028.
So, why do I think Trump won’t be 45-47? –> Kamala will finish off the last few months as the first female President. Joe will resign immediately after the election. Kamala will enjoy all the benefits as a payoff for not running in 2028.
PDJT will probably be 45-48.
Hadn’t thought of that. Of course I don’t think of Biden as a real #46 anyway.
Those who think Kamala will walk away are wrong, IMO. Before the 2020 election her husband, “Second Gentleman,” was going around telling people that his wife was going to be the next president. She wants it.
DJT will be too old and too tired to try again in ‘28. He’s “all in” now.
You missed the point, Kamala becomes the 47th president finishing Biden’s term after he resigns on or about Nov 6, 2024. On January 20,2025 PDJT is sworn in as the 48th President.
Kamala enjoys all benefits and “book money” from being the 1st female president in return for not running in 2028.
Unless, of course, she can be convinced to pull out prior to their convention while her replacement comes into focus: Does that look like Hillary or Michelle? Hillary for the political skill, Michelle for her skin color. Biden stays out front, while he gets stabbed from behind (again!), a win win for the dems!
“DJT will be too old and too tired to try again in ‘28”
plus, I don’t think Ivanka would let him
Ivanka? His daughter? I doubt he’d make a major decision based on her wants. She & her husband vowed to stay out of this campaign, so IMO a run in ’28 would depend mostly on him & Melania* and his health and energy.
*Melania has some significant input – her support is pretty vital according to PDJT in interviews..
Try this hat on for size; Biden resigns before the convention, thus making her the 47th President. She in turn promises to pardon all of Biden Family Crimes and chooses her new VP- (my guess is Michele Obama). They come out of the DNC convention with their new ticket unified.
Something like never let a catastrophe go to waste.
I don’t trust them, and I am praying for President Trump to return to the White House.
This isn’t being decided at the Obama camp or the Hillary camp level. They both have the same masters/benefactors.
Hans Mahncke
@HansMahncke
Out of all the media’s hoaxes, the “no one knew” hoax is probably the worst because they constantly recycle it to cover up their other hoaxes:
•no one knew that Hillary paid for the dossier
•no one knew that Steele made everything up
•no one knew that the “vaccines” didn’t stop transmission
•no one knew that Covid came out of a lab
•no one knew that Hunter’s laptop was real
•no one knew about Biden family corruption
•no one knew that Biden is senile
https://x.com/HansMahncke/status/1807581464864674035
We treepers have been pulling our hair out for years … because we’ve known all these things, most of them contemporaneously to their occurrences.
Or very shortly thereafter.
Many of us know about events in real time as they happen. That’s mainly because we don’t wait for fake news propaganda to “reveal” the truth down the road. We already see it right now.
So when will the “fake news” propagandists catch up to the fact we had a TREASONOUS coup de etat .. ie.. a stolen election.. to install Brandon the usurper in 2021?
If ever?
Very true C4A thank you Sundance
Does that make us individually or collectively “no one”?
This “no one” they speak of is not too bright.
Majority of sentient American voters’ response: “No one now cares to hear from the corrupt, lying and bought-off MSM anymore!” Comeuppance.
No one knew is actually correct.
The truth is that EVERYONE knew.
JUST IN 🚨 The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled to return to the lower courts a case on whether the states have the right to curb the power of social media companies to moderate content.
https://t.me/THEREALTORIABROOKE/48493
A couple of additional points from the Roberts opinion: The court indicates that the president’s immunity for official acts “extends to the outer perimeter of the President’s official responsibilities, covering actions so long as they are not manifestly or palpably beyond his authority.”
And in determining what is or is not official conduct, “courts may not inquire into the President’s motives.”
An action is not unofficial, the court adds, just because “it allegedly violates a generally applicable law.”
The court also notes in a footnote that the district court “if necessary” should consider whether two of the charges brought by Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, involving the obstruction of an official proceeding, can go forward in light of the court’s ruling last week in Fischer v. United States, narrowing the scope of that law.
Thanks for your clarity.
With the “outer perimeter” inclusion, it would appear that ex-presidential criminal immunity is essentially co-extensive with its civil immunity (See, Nixon v. Fitzgerald, Syllabus, “C. The President’s absolute immunity extends to all acts within the “outer perimeter” of his duties of office. Pp. 457 U. S. 755-757.”)
I guess the Supreme Court decision was pretty good…
In a blistering dissent, Justice Sotomayor writes that the ruling “makes a mockery of the principle, foundational to our constitution and system of government, that no man is above the law.”
“Relying on little more than its own misguided wisdom… the court gives former President trump all the immunity he asked for and more.”
No, Sonia, he didn’t get immunity for all acts, only for official acts. Quit venting and try reading the majority opinion, honey.
Consider the source. We, right this moment, have the two dumbest justices ever appointed.
I read content here first, then went to Yahoo to see how the Commies were writing their headlines. The cited text read like their headlines. Unsurprising. More election year theater.
Amy and who else?? 😂😂😂
Some of her dissents/concurring opinions are very special. She gives a bad name to women.
Amy is a certifiable MENSA stud relative to Sotomayor and Jackson.
Amy isn’t stupid as much as she has an odd disregard for the Constitution.
“special”
I thought Kagan was intelligent but it doesn’t matter since she is an ideologue in all ways. I consider Sotomayor as not intelligent enough to be on the court; the other one is even dumber.
An immediate mandatory remedial course study in the US Constitution should be ordered by CJ Roberts for these ‘Ignant’ dissenters to be administered by Attys Turley and Dershowitz. Roberts will miss his chance,… again.
Huh? She was there. I think she knows more than you.
Apparently, she doesn’t.
As Wethal said; “….he didn’t get immunity for all acts, only for official acts. “
What is this “reading” of which you speak?
Is that you, Merrick?
Did she give President Trump the little t in the quote or did you just make a mistake?
Did this liberal hack really say “no MAN is above the law? Memo from the pronoun/gendering police incoming soon.
The only mockery is the notion that this glorified secretary to Frumpy Kagan is worthy of being considered a Supreme Court Justice. She would be intellectually overmatched as an Associate Magistrate in your local municipal court settling a pooper scooper dispute.
Her boss, Frumpy Kagan, and Scummy say anything do anything for personal gain Iackson simply does what the DC Mafia instructs, as evidenced by their insipid behavior in oral arguments.
More “no man is above the law” from the party that defines democracy as obedience to their agenda. Here’s a public official using his office to deprive people of the American as apple pie right to protest at the capitol:
“our office wanted to ensure that there was shock and awe…it worked because we saw through media posts that
peopleconservatives were afraid to come back to D.C. – Michael Sherwin of the so-called Justice Department, also know as the Party’s Office of Intimidation and Coercion.Is intimidation of the people an official act or extracurricular, or do the women in robes check the party affiliation first?
“….the court gives former President Trump all the immunity he asked for and more.”
Another absolutely despicable bald faced lie. President Trump NEVER asked for immunity that was not already his by virtue of his office held at the time of the alleged misdeeds. Komrad Sotomayor stays consistent with her anti-Constitutional judgements.
Jonathan Turley reads through SCOTUS’ ruling affirming presidential immunity:
“In reading through this opinion, I can’t see how this doesn’t induce cardiac arrest in the special counsel…The court is imposing a very significant burden on Jack Smith when this goes back to the judge.”
Boom!
Video:
https://t.me/CharlieKirk/15483
Jack Smith is holding the opinion, and crying while he sings the Elton John song “I’m Still Standing”:
He never had standing.
I agree. I haven’t read the full SCOTUS opinion, although I know Thomas specifically addressed the standing issue.
I wonder – with Justice Thomas making that specific standing issue regarding Jack Smith, will this question play into the Florida case where Judge Cannon is dealing with Jack Smith’s case against President Trump and the Presidential Documents Act?
I bet she does, or at least puts the Florida case on a longer hiatus to see if the case just remanded back to the lower court in DC approaches the hot potato of Jack Smith’s legality.
It appears that he is showing Cannon support on her direction.
SC, Jack Smith – You’re Next.
Kudos, Scotus!
The rest of us are singing the Roy Orbison song “It’s Over”.
FYI – you are posting a lot of links to Telegram posts but those of us who do not have Telegram cannot open or even see most of them. If you have a different link to something that anyone can view or can actually post the content it would be very helpful. Thanks!
Here you go:
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6351739592112
Thanks!
You’re welcome!
The ones I hate are when someone posts sites behind paywalls when there are many non-paywall sites that have the same story that can be found with a simple search.
This clip is old…from April
When the poster provides an additional link from another source, I post it. If it allows me to copy the quote, I post that too. Unfortunately, a lot of times they don’t. I am not on X so I don’t know if they are posting it on there too. I also noticed that if they are on Truth Social, they are slower to update their posts there and skip more of their recent posts.
Okay, I am not on Truth Social, X, or Telegram so it is hard to follow along when posters here share links that can’t be opened unless one is also on the channel from which the link came…I guess I will just have to wait until Sundance posts his round up on this SCOTUS decision, which I suspect will be coming later today!
How many times have we asked if you put up a link please include synopsis?
There’s a synopsis with WeThePeople’s post.
By x, do you mean Xitter?
First opinion of the day was another blow at the administrative state, Corner Post.
The truck stop, Corner Post, was fighting a 2011 Federal Reserve rule that capped “interchange fees” at 21 cents per transaction plus a small percentage of that transaction’s value. Retail stores have long chafed at those fees.
The issue before the Supreme Court was technical: The government argued the truck stock couldn’t sue over the rule.
because a six-year statute of limitations had already run out.
But Corner Post did not incorporate until 2017 and it argued the statute-of-limitations clock didn’t start ticking until it opened its doors. It claimed that any other outcome would mean a company would be barred from suing over a government regulation before it even began operations.
The federal government said Corner Post’s position would allow opponents of a regulation to challenge it forever by simply finding a new company willing to sue. A federal district court and the 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the federal government.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the opinion for a 6-3 majority, with the liberal justices in dissent. She rejected the Justice Department’s argument that the statute of limitations runs from when a regulation is finalized.
“Under the Board’s finality rule, only those fortunate enough to suffer an injury within six years of a rule’s promulgation may bring an (Administrative Procedure Act) suit. Everyone else – no matter how serious the injury or how illegal the rule – has no recourse,” Barrett wrote.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented:
“The flawed reasoning and far-reaching results of the Court’s ruling in this case are staggering,” Jackson wrote.
“The majority refuses to accept the straightforward, commonsense, and singularly plausible reading of the limitations statute that Congress wrote. In doing so, the Court wreaks havoc on Government agencies, businesses, and society at large,” she added. “At the end of a momentous Term, this much is clear: The tsunami of lawsuits against agencies that the Court’s holdings in this case and Loper Bright have authorized has the potential to devastate the functioning of the Federal Government.”
That’s the point, Ketanji. A tsunami of lawsuits.
Reading this morning’s content on rulings, I’m also considering how they can be used by the Commies to hamstring PDJT’s administration and/or allow more freedom for Communist mercenary activities to be enabled with such ‘discretion’. Perhaps I’m too suspicious but the timing has me reaching for the ammo box. Sure is quiet here for July 4th week. Eery.
Ha, just as I write, a mortar goes off, echoing through the forest. 🙂
“That’s the point, Ketanji. A tsunami of lawsuits.”
EXACTLY!! It truly is ironic how these dissents are from the “ladies” of the court, including the supposed Originalist ACB…they honestly seem to believe that “government knows best” and we should all just accept whatever they tell us!
Barrett was selected for that very reason.They could have gotten a dozen other women who would likely have overturned Roe v. Wade, but she was picked because of a particular ruling she had made less than a month before.
Now “women” are getting the blame.
Your interpretations are very interesting and sound – imho.
Keep’m coming.
Good I hope everyone Sues them into oblivion
Exactemundo.
Waiting for Sundance response
Will the get Trump on his statements?
Remembering Congressman Murtha:
Murtha outright lied and stated that Marine Lance Cpl. Justin Sharratt “killed innocent civilians in cold blood”
In Sharratt v. Murtha , a unanimous three-judge panel found that members of Congress are acting within the scope of their employment when giving media interviews and are therefore protected by qualified immunity.
In the suit, Marine Lance Cpl. Justin Sharratt of Washington County, Pa., complained that Murtha defamed him in interviews with CNN and NPR when he made remarks about a November 2005 incident in Haditha, Iraq, that resulted in the deaths of 15 Iraqi civilians.
The suit said that Murtha, who died in February 2010, had claimed in the interviews that he had information from “the highest level of the Marine Corps” that the Marines had “overreacted because of the pressure on them and killed innocent civilians in cold blood.”
https://archive.is/YSFe2#selection-3279.0-3291.264
On February 8, 2010, God had sorted it out and removed Murtha from earth
There was Karma with his death. Murtha died of an intestinal infection caused by a botched gall bladder operation. The operation was performed at Bethesda Naval Hospital, which includes the US Marine Corps
Live in Danbury.
Bannon enters prison.
https://rumble.com/v3by09g-warroom-live.html
If this applies to all government officials, doesn’t it mean Merrick Garland is guilty?
And AG, Garland’s puppet master, Liza Mon-o-co, as well?
It doesn’t.
PRESIDENTIAL immunity.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/06/biden_s_failing_brain_exposes_deep_state_treachery.html
I wish I would have flown to Danberry CT…
I see our enemies there trying to interfere with Bannon’s show today.. yelling “traitor” — God forgive me for hating these people.
Just noticed that myself; hope she ends up hoarse for a month.
Her Screeching Voice is Going…
( SOON i HOPE )
Oh my gosh she just kept screaming through the Priest’s prayer! These people are heathens!
the clanging cowbell is what bothered me. someone should have been there with a loud horn and blown it in her ear.
Danbury, CT.
So this is the chain of judges Trump’s D.C. cases went through and will go through now again to determine “official” vs. “unofficial” acts. There isn’t much diversity in the D.C. court system. How about a few white male judges for a change?
Liberal men and women judges are the worst…they violate their oaths, the law, abuse power, conduct malicious prosecutions, violate civil rights, etc. all under the COLOR of LAW! There are 18 federal judges in NY/Washington DC at least who should be removed and disbarred for the J6 crimes they committed as judges.
Rush was Right – FemiNazis!
For some reason that perhaps a psychologist could explain, someone who gets handed a high position but Didn’t Earn It, always ends up believing he or she is the best there is.
I can’t believe it. I go on YouTube, and I see ad after ad featuring Barack Obama: “Five dollars, just send $5, and Joe and Kamala will have enough to win in November!”
It reminds me of, “Brother can you spare a dime?” Just unreal.
I think the Democrats can’t stop lying. They are addicted to dissimulation and prevarication. It is obvious and embarrassing. These are the ads the public sees, while the party is focused on somehow getting rid of Joe at all costs.
Sotomayer: Thump! Rubber stamp.
Kagan: Thump! Rubber stamp.
Jackson: Confused. Still comprehending what a female is…… Oh well, that’s above my pay grade. Thump! Rubber stamp.
Got to admit the Dems appointees almost never wander of the reservation. They are never under the illusion that they are free thinkers.
Maximum possible Individual Freedom is crazy talk to them. Minimum possible government is just a joke to them because their power is derived from the oppressive state.
God is good!!!!
Justice Thomas: “In this case, there has been much discussion about ensuring that a President ‘is not above the law.’ But, as the Court explains, the President’s immunity from prosecution for his official acts is the law…
Respecting the protections that the Constitution provides for the Office of the Presidency secures liberty. In that same vein, the Constitution also secures liberty by separating the powers to create and fill offices.
And, there are serious questions whether the Attorney General has violated that structure by creating an office of the Special Counsel that has not been established by law.
Those questions must be answered before this prosecution can proceed. We must respect the Constitution’s separation of powers in all its forms, else we risk rendering its protection of liberty a parchment guarantee.”
https://x.com/bhweingarten/status/1807791517324439933
And just like that, quietly and without fanfare, Clarence Thomas just threw a grenade into the heart of malicious prosecutors of the DOJ!! God bless you Sir, for your calm and always professional adherence to the Constitution of the United States!
Remind Justice Jackson not to fret about this Majority ruling today and her worry about a Potus being above the law,…. cuz our Founders covered that with “Congress can Impeach any Potus for High Crimes and Misdemeanors!”
Sotomayor and Jackson have hired legal translators.
CBS News Special Report 😬
I just saw a clip of Major Garrett with CBS reviewing the Supreme Court decision. No surprises:
The reporter said:” Let’s be very clear about what happened on January 6: Donald Trump snapped after he lost the 2020 election and encouraged a mob to overthrow the results of a free and fair election”
I expect the other so-called news outlets will fall in line with these type of comments and analysis to bash President Trump. Never let a crisis go to waste is their motto.
So J6 was the day to officially certify the election results and electors. My understanding is there is a legal process that can be used to not certify certain electors. President Trump asked Congress to do its job, asked Pence to do his job and not certify certain state electors until an investigation could be done considering the tons of evidence of corruption in their election.
To me, he’s asking for a delay in certification. That’s not overthrowing the election. He did not demand alternative electors that supported him be certified instead of the ones in question. He wanted an investigation and recertification pending what they found.
However, people that watch CBS and the others will be convinced that President Trump is evil and corrupt with reports like this. Seems like there should be some legal process to sue CBS for this type of reporting-slander, election interference, fraud or something.
Maybe send CBS an authentic list of corruption and election irregularities that occurred to their news department by certified mail. Say there is evidence that needs to be investigated and to say or suggest that the evidence should not have been investigated is fraudulent.
Or something-This NO EVIDENCE of a corrupt election needs to be challenged someway so they stop repeating it. After all, that was the root cause of J6 anyway.
Unfortunately, in my view, the Supreme Court’s decision in the “immunity” case was not decisive enough. The Court still left the matter up to “lower Courts.” Which leaves the “tiny gap” open that, from now on, “Lawfare” courts – specifically in the “District of DC” – will now forever exploit.
“Article 2” is now forever(!) subordinate to “Article 3.” But you, as the Article 2 officeholder, will never know if – or when, in the future – your decision was judged (by others …) to be “unofficial.”
The United States Constitution does not use this term. But now, in yet another act of judicial cowardice, “the Law does.”
This matter will probably not be settled until all of us are dead. But, it will come down to one of two possible acts:
• The future President appeals his imprisonment to the Supreme Court.
• The future President appeals his conviction for criminal liability because he declined to act for fear of other liability.
In either case, the “Lawfare™ principle” now dominates. The Judicial Branch has now seized effective power from all others. The specific Judicial Circuit of the District of Columbia now rules the land, and no one who now controls it is “elected.”
We can all still walk to the National Archives and read this single-page handwritten document. Either it means what it says, or it does not.
We can now easily see where this might go. Constituents in a district of the State of [X] now sue their Representative for criminal damages, asserting that his or her action was, in fact, “unofficial.” The actions of the Governor and of the Legislature are immediately chilled, awaiting a single Grand Jury’s decision.
.
I agree. I’m particularly irritated by leaving the door open for things such as haviving a discussion or disagreement with the VP regarding the interpretation of a law. And that the “preliminary determination” of official/unofficial etc. opens the door to a lot of hassle.
.
Effing Roberts could not close a door if his life depended on it. Always the fence sitter, waiting see how the wind blows. He’s a coward, a man without conviction. History will not be kind to him.
Yes, it is quite clear that both the President and the Vice-President are Constitutionally-appointed Executive officers. The President is tasked to see that “the Laws are faithfully Executed,” while the Veep is President of the Senate. Anything that the two might say to one another is clearly not “a criminal matter.”
The matter that concerns me is not this, but the notion of: “unofficial.”
The Constitution never uses this word in discussion of the conduct of any officer of any Branch. To do so now becomes a “loophole.”
I see where you might be frustrated, but Courts can only decide controversies before them and cannot go beyond that for convenience.
The immunity issue was settle. The lower Courts must have the opportunity to make decisions on the official v. unofficial acts. SCOTUS will intercede if needed on appeal. That’s how our injustice system works.
This guarantees it will be a moot issue until at least December 2024, if not June 2025.
I understand.
From the majority ruling ….
The Roberts way. Thanks W, you blithering moron.
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
That almost the entire media repeated the same lie with the exact same words is disturbing.
The legacy news is not merely fake, but also unoriginally fake!
—
“Sharp as a tack”…
Video linked…
Tarp as a shack.
.
I think that’s Newsome . . .
Simultaneously hilarious and extremely frightening…what a world we are loving in…
“Disturbing?”
Elon, they’ve been doing it for years. If you had listened to Rush back in the day, you would have heard some of the clips he played of the MSM repeating the same talking points ad nauseum.
My blood pressure goes up every time I read of someone who claims to have an amazing revelation about leftists in the media.
Remember Journ-O-List?
Sharp as a marble.
The Absurdity of “Open Borders” – America First Report
Supreme Court Upholds ‘Absolute Immunity’ for Presidents in Trump Case
https://www.dailysignal.com/2024/07/01/supreme-court-upholds-absolute-immunity-presidents-trump-case/
I have read through the majority opinion and made notes. I will share those when the thread goes up.
SCOTUS majority opinion, imho, got it all exactly correct.
Whew.
.
Thomas whacked the Special Counsel. Good read. Next go-round.
.
Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
@julie_kelly2
SCOTUS orders Judge Chutkan to determine whether Trump’s attempts to pressure VP Pence to reject or send back electoral slates in contested states is covered under the president’s executive power:
Cont…
.
Irritating, split the baby.
.
I skimmed the first pages of the Opinion, if I recall correctly at ii. It addresses the VP talks and SCOTUS said that absolutely falls into Presidential immunity, where the conversations with state and private officials needs to be addressed, methodically, by the lower Courts.
If that’s the task, why bother, you know how Chutkan is going to rule.
IIRC, the president sought counsel on the legality of this action before he started. Does anyone belive President Trump came up with the idea all by himself?
If you want to see the Webster Dictionary definition of HYPOCRISY wait for the prosecution of:
Garland
Smith
Bragg
Fani
CoAngelo
Mershan etc
…to hit the Supreme Court and watch as Sotomayor and the two other Bolsheviks rule that prosecutors and judges have absolute immunity for everything and the “NO MAN IS ABOVE THE LAW” goes out the window!
Rich Baris The People’s Pundit
@Peoples_Pundit
Once again, Corporate Big Media lied to the American People on a question so massive to our society, they are literally a destructive force in it.
“Whenever the President and Vice President discuss their official responsibilities, they engage in official conduct. Presiding over the January 6 certification proceeding at which Members of Congress count the electoral votes is a constitutional and statutory duty of the Vice President. Art. II, §1, cl. 3; Amdt. 12; 3 U. S. C. §15. The indictment’s allegations that Trump attempted to pressure the Vice President to take particular acts in connection with his role at the certification proceeding thus involve official conduct, and Trump is at least presumptively immune from prosecution for such conduct.”
11:02 AM · Jul 1, 2024
.
Notice that the DC District Court and the three-person panel on the DC appellate court, and all of the dissenters on the Supreme Court were women.
Further Affiant Sayeth Nought…
.
You be in beeg trouble!
…and all were 100% WRONG!
We could have hire a half-dozen high school dropouts and gotten a better decision!
Send Jack Smith back to the Hague.
Naw, pull his passport and keep him here. We’re going to need to talk to that boy next year….
Happy Canada Day to our Canadian treepers!
Does NM join blue states that are now in play?
If you want to play the polling game, then generally more than one poll would be needed to make sure it’s not an outlier. Especially since it’s internal polling by a candidate apparently.
But yes, given the overall shift towards Trump, it almost certainly is in play.
Imho…It wouldn’t be surprising to find Domenici is backed by the DS and groomed by the Barr’s.
Patricia Barr Straughn (Bill Barr’s daughter)
House Agriculture Committee Counsel/Deputy Counsel (Oct 2007 -2019) – Chief Counsel (Jan 2019 – present)
Staff assistant to Former Sen. Pete Domenici (R-NM) 2003-2004
https://http://www.legistorm.com/person/Patricia_Barr_Straughn/44932.html
Pelham Straughn (son-in-law)
Staff Director House Agriculture Committee beginning 2001 and Policy Director (Mar 2011 – Jan 2015)
9b Group, Inc Partner/Co-Founder (Jan 2015)
From Website – …’providing clients with unparalleled expertise in conservation and sustainability’ … ‘assisting others in realizing, expanding, and surpassing their conservation and sustainability goals.’
… “His final four years on the Hill, Pelham served as the Policy Director for the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Agriculture under Chairman Frank Lucas leading his policy team during the formation, debate, and passage of the Agricultural Act of 2014.
https://www.9bgroup.com/our-team
https://www.legistorm.com/person/bio/18873/Pelham_Agee_Straughn.html
.
Very odd to me, the way New Mexico has so many Nevada connections.
Heinrich was born there and his grandparents still have roads named after them in the same locale that ‘some’ Domenici had ranching concerns.
Then there is the Laxalt (a NV Senator) connections to Domenici via Laxalt being the grandfather to Domenici son, Adam Laxalt.
Which is not to say that Heinrich does not have some sort of interesting parentage himself . . .
The Atlantic – Feb 2013
Senator Had a Secret Son With Pundit Who Praised Him as a Great Dad
FTA-
Pundit and lobbyist Michelle Laxalt gave an impassioned defense of then-Sen. Pete Domenici on CNN in 2007, saying he was a man of “integrity” who was “supporting no fewer than eight children.” That curiously inexact reference to the number of his kids makes sense now that Domenici has admitted to secretly fathering a son with Laxalt in the 1980s.
Domenici admitted on Tuesday that Adam Paul Laxalt, a lawyer in Nevada, is actually his son. Michelle Laxalt is the daughter of former Sen. Paul Laxalt, and her family connections served her quite well. She was named one of the top 50 lobbyists in D.C. by the Washingtonian in 1993 and 1998. But she had a clear rule: No lobbying dad. ”The first thing I do is make it clear to clients that I will not lobby my father at any time,” Laxalt told U.S. News & World Report on November 26, 1984. “I write a clause that specifies this — so they’ll know I’m not kidding.”
We don’t know what the rules were about lobbying her son’s dad, though Domenici sat on some pretty important committees: Appropriations, Energy, Homeland Security. Laxalt and Domenici were rarely mentioned in news reports going back to the 1980s, according to a Lexis Nexis scan. Politico describes her as “one of the most prominent and effective government relations practitioners in the nation’s capital.” In the last decade, she’s frequently appeared as a conservative pundit on all three major cable news channels, like here in 2008, when she talked about GOP concerns over Sarah Palin on CNN.
Nella Domenici (daughter)
Demonici’s daughter Nella is a hedge fund manager and the presumptive nominee for the Republican Party in the 2024 United States Senate election in New Mexico.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/01/16/domenici-daughter-senate-run-new-mexico-00135999
Her LinkedIn account illustrates globalists leanings.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/nella-domenici-909276163
.
I have never read that Paul Laxalt knew who fathered his grandson.
Would he have called his daughter a ‘silly, silly woman’ had he known?
From what I hear about the Laxalts in NV now — also after his mom, Michelle has passed — is that they are not favorable to Adam and did not support his Senatorial campaign.
My wondering is whether the people of New Mexico will treat a Domenici candidacy like the people of Nevada treated a Laxalt candidacy?
Or, will the people of New Mexico savor a Domenici because at least they knew who her father was — which I do not believe it has been as forthcoming as to whom Heinrich’s father was . . .
Martin Heinrich father – Pete Heinrich passed away on the 14th of March, 2018 at the age of 87. He was born in Waldenborg, Germany in 1930 as Heinrich Peter Karl Cordes. His mother Helen later remarried to Olaf Heinrich and his surname changed as a result. Helen and Olaf Heinrich immigrated to the United States when Pete was a young boy and the family settled in the American West living in New Mexico, California, and Nevada.
Pete always enjoyed hard work and actually moved out of his parents’ home as a teenager to build fence and cowboy for local ranches. He was naturalized as a US Citizen in 1955 and changed his name to Pete Carl Heinrich.
Pete’s college years were spent at UC Davis, but he left before graduating to join the US Navy where he served in the Pacific on the USS Curtis and the USS Orca. He loved traveling to foreign ports like Hong Kong and the Philippines. Pete became an atomic veteran when he witnessed two above ground nuclear explosions in the Marshall Islands on Enewetak and Bikini Atolls. These events would contribute to his health challenges late in life as his radiation exposure was substantial.”…
https://www.fentonfuneralchapel.com/obituary/pete-heinrich
.
Pete had a brother who was first married to Martin’s mother.
The brother looked nothing like Olaf, but Pete did . . .
What was happening in the world, specifically Germany, at the time of that immigration — specifically hiding one’s identity and attempting to not be outed as a ‘spy’ or some such . . .
New Mexico’s such a beautiful state.
Wish they’d get their act together.
Doubtful…about half the State is on Government Assistance…
Scotus immunity ruling:
She doesn’t look sorry to me.
She look fine…
😎
Shaun Maguire
@shaunmmaguire
This kid will go on to do great things
While Harvard is accumulating capable enemies at an unprecedented rate
—
End Wokeness
@EndWokeness
His GPA score is 97.3%, SAT score is 1560, enrolled in a top high school, does tons of extracurricular work.
He was rejected by multiple colleges.
They call this equity and inclusion.
Video linked in tweet…
WHY IS THE WEST SO WEAK (AND RUSSIA SO STRONG)? THE ROLE OF HUMAN CAPITAL AND WESTERN EDUCATION
Keeping such out and down, and elevating worthless drones to pack institutions and corporations, is all intentional to protect the Communists from those capable of competing with them, and capable of picking up the reins in the midst of ruin and restore our industry.
Consider it a pre-revolution suppression of those that a successful revolution would immediately slaughter en masse.
The dearth of genius level general competence will be, I surmise, the most challenging aspect of President Trump’s reshoring of industry. Perhaps he will institute a program to rapidly educate those suppressed souls that can become the titans of industry America will soon need, call it Trump University of Titans.
NO!!!! You did not disappoint yourself. You are not a disappointment. Its not the you failed to get into to harvard or princeton. You are the innocent victim of a racism and discrimination.
I know this is painful and I hope he is surrounded by a lot of love and support.
Not getting in hahvahd is a blessing you just can’t see yet.
They’ve been doing it to white people – primarily white men for decades. Not just in universities but also most large employers.
We are headed to a place that few wish to acknowledge. A modern country with a complex advanced infrastructure requires a certain amount of workers with an above average IQ. The US will not always have the human resources to maintain our first world standard of living.
Expect to see more bridge collapses, mechanical failures, and gross medical malpractice to name a few outcomes of the forced demographic changes and the discrimination against whites and Asians by medical, engineering, etc. schools.
And he isn’t even white.
JULY 01 2024
Saudi announces discovery of multiple oil, gas fields
Saudi Arabia’s energy minister announced on Monday the discovery of seven oil and gas deposits in the kingdom’s Eastern Province
[…] “two unconventional oil fields, a reservoir of light Arabian oil, two natural gas fields, and two natural gas reservoirs,”
MORE:
https://www.khaleejtimes.com/world/gulf/saudi-announces-discovery-of-multiple-oil-gas-fields
All candidates should be challenged now on their stand on Job Biden’s competency. Make them choose a side before the deep state announces.
PDJT is the true touchstone revealing the genuine stripes of politicians and would be politicians.
If they embrace him without bursting into flames they stand a good chance of being worthy.
None who reject Biden, when all are clearly called upon to do so now as they witness the new Kablooi Theater roll out, validate themselves in any manner whatsoever, it only proves they can read the script; let them prove they’ve always rejected Biden, and not simply on his competency.
And all media reporters
Oliver really knocked these lines out of the park!
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!
JUNE 30 2024
The Economist _UK
Ukraine has a month to avoid default
Lending to a borrower at war entails an additional gamble: that it will win
[…]Ukraine faces a cash crunch—and soon.
[…]the moratorium from private foreign bondholders, including Amundi, a French asset manager, and pimco, an American one, is set to expire on August 1st.
[…]If Ukraine does default, it would reflect a troubling lack of faith among private investors concerning the West’s commitment. In the long run, that could spell disaster for the country’s recovery.
[…]Only $8bn of America’s recent package will go directly to Ukraine’s government
[…] Ukraine has two options.
One is to negotiate an extension on its debt-service freeze, as it has already with official creditors, who will forgo payments until 2027.
The other is to default.
That may sound drastic, but in reality there is little difference between the scenarios.
Either way, Ukrainian payments will not resume.
[…]Much of Ukraine’s recovery—including the construction of basic infrastructure, civic buildings, as well as training people to rebuild the country—will never turn a profit, and will thus need to be shouldered by the country’s allies.
https://archive.ph/vctWv
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Today’s Historic Decision by the Supreme Court should end all of Crooked Joe Biden’s Witch Hunts against me,
including the New York Hoaxes
– The Manhattan SCAM cooked up by Soros backed D.A., Alvin Bragg,
Racist New York Attorney General Tish James’ shameless ATTACK
on the amazing business that I have built,
and the FAKE Bergdorf’s “case.”
PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN!
our flimsy immigration laws, allowed us to get the narrative that Obama droned an American Citizen… thats an example of some immunity Obama got away with.
good example to bring up when people in cognitive dissonance are having a NPC attack
al Awlaki was the Hijacker Handler for Dirty Bob Mueller.
Barry made sure he can’t talk anymore.
if you listen close the liars dont hide their actions.
Pelosi and every other Democrat operative is saying the debate (Biden alone by himself soley getting all blame) was bad but the Presidency (unelected people telling Biden to sign here) was good.
I think the best measure of today’s immunity opinion is going to be the left’s reaction.
Schumer is already whining about the “MAGA Supreme Court.”
Schadenfreude – zero calories and no hangover. Drink up.
Read somewhere that AOC wants the justices impeached. These people are so deranged.
Justice Thomas:
“Before the President or a Department Head can appoint any officer, however, the Constitution requires that the underlying office be “established by Law.”1 The Constitution itself creates some offices, most obviously that of the President and Vice President. See §1. Although the Constitution contemplates that there will be “other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for,” it clearly requires that those offices “shall be established by Law.” §2, cl. 2. And, “established by law” refers to an office that Congress creates “by statute.” Lucia v. SEC, 585 U. S. 237, 254 (2018) (THOMAS, J., concurring); see also United States v. Maurice, 26 F. Cas. 1211, 1213 (No. 15,747) (CC Va. 1823) (Marshall, C. J.).”
I hope Judge Cannon is listening.
It is inconceivable that Judge Cannon would not examine this decision with great care. Expect Jack Smith to be found – and that finding upheld – unqualified and unauthorized to initiate the prosecutions. As an aside, Jack Smith may not enjoy prosecutorial immunity afforded to confirmed U.S. Attorneys.
“As an aside, Jack Smith may not enjoy prosecutorial immunity afforded to confirmed U.S. Attorneys.”
Ultimate KARMA on steroids! 😇
In anticipation of the Conviction,… start building the Public Gallows on the National Mall to establish Execution of it. Oh yeah, PPV it it to off set our National Debt.
Jack Smith may be exposed to civil liability for his conduct. I do not believe that Pinocchio Joe can issue a pardon for civil liability. President Trump would likely be loathe to pursue a tort case against Smith. Perhaps some others would have standing?
The “Pro-Democracy” folks rioting and burning down buildings in France, cuz they lost the Election.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/riots-break-france-antifa-is-vandalizing-stores-after/
The Olympics should be interesting. The Seine is too dirty to be used for swimming events, too.
My dad said it stunk to high heaven when he was there after the Allied Forces took Paris in WW2
I was there in August 1981 and the stench of crap, BO, and garbage was horrendous.
….more mainly peaceful protests….
At some point, people are going to have to put on their antifa beaters and get to work.
New York City 11-6-24
And Minneapolis, Portland, Seattle, San Fran, etc.
Any big Blue City, fascist Antifa will get their marching orders, as usual.
Sundance,
As you do your write up, you may wish to focus on the implications of Footnote 3.
SCOTUS went out of its way to put that in there.
“What the prosecutor may not do, however, is admit testimony or private records of the President or his advisers probing the official act itself. Allowing that sort of evidence would invite the jury to inspect the President’s motivations for his official actions and to second-guess their propriety. As we have explained, such inspection would be ‘highly intrusive’ and would ‘ “seriously cripple” ‘ the President’s exercise of his official duties. Fitzgerald, 457 U. S., at 745, 756 (quoting Spalding v. Vilas, 161 U. S. 483, 498 (1896)); see supra, at 18. And such second-guessing would ‘threaten the independence or effectiveness of the Executive.’ Trump v. Vance, 591 U. S. 786, 805 (2020).”
This part?
The part clarifying that a prosecutor not being able to introduce evidence of official acts to prove criminal liability for unofficial acts or acts for which there is only a rebuttable preseumption of immunity does NOT mean being unable to introduce into evidence the completion of an official act in a criminal case on a charge of bribery.
President Trump never accepted a bribe for an official act, either directly or indirectly.
Guess who did??
As I said, SCOTUS did not have to write that little caveat / exception into its opinion . . .
But it did.
👀
Patriots are in control. 😎
Biden, Clinton, Obama, and potentially Bush . . . All the stones are lining up to cross that river to allow President Trump to prosecute them, at the very least for taking bribes.
I’ll have more on that point when Sundance posts his thread.
This will hamstring the Lower WDC Court’s review now regarding “Official Acts!” BooYeah!
….” After enduring three and half years of incarceration for cavalierly strolling through the U.S. Capitol building for a few minutes on Jan. 6, 2021, radio talk show host Darrel Neelly is a free man.
…..Neely was escorted into the building by a woman in a pink beret who has yet to be arrested. Many suspect the woman in the pink hat is was among confidential human sources or government provocateurs embedded in the crowd to provoke demonstrators to break the law during the riot.”……
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/07/j6-political-hostage-darrell-neely-released-prison-after/