In a 52-paragraph mutually agreed declaration following the G20 Summit in Bali, Indonesia, the leaders at the 20-nation summit have agreed to a process for digital vaccine IDs to facilitate international travel. The alarming aspect is found on paragraph 23 of the Declaration.
[Paragraph 23] – We support continued international dialogue and collaboration on the establishment of trusted global digital health networks as part of the efforts to strengthen prevention and response to future pandemics, that should capitalize and build on the success of the existing standards and digital COVID-19 certificates.
“We acknowledge the importance of shared technical standards and verification methods, under the framework of the IHR (2005), to facilitate seamless international travel, interoperability, and recognizing digital solutions and non-digital solutions, including proof of vaccinations.” (link)
The members of the G20 are: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the European Union.
If We the People stand together we can rid the world of the totalitarians – mainly central bank mafia who own and control all major governments and corporations . This would be far easier than trying to defeat them at the ballot box which hasn’t worked or through financial means such as boycotts. They control the money so financial leverage won’t work. The only peaceful way to beat them is to simply become independent of their systems through barter, food security, energy security etc. on a local basis. Stop enlisting in their military organizations and form mutual support networks for life’s basics. Everything is about control so find ways to be independent. We will all be stronger and independent. If we truly unite we can beat them but we MUST stop listening to their lies and avoid their many manipulations.
True Words , Noble Thoughts !
Then the lights go out , your child or you get ill requiring serious modern medical attention or else …
I get where your coming from and cutting the BIG CLUB out of your loop can be done but to what level and how long .
Perhaps it is better to play their game and just toss sand in the gears and fart in the room at every opportunity
You can and should do both—be independent and prepared, but part of that is knowing when to get to the best faciltity to treat someone. Preparedness is knowledge and follow-thru, in whatever way needed. But you will be happy if prepared because the norm will be that you are well and the lights go out. Better have some stuff.
More likely to end international travel. At least by free thinking people.
Thank God I have no interest in visiting some other country.
If it ever gets in place it won’t stop at air travel.
The last time I went through Customs in Frankfurt, Germany the Federal Police were absolute and total jerks. They ordered me to stand in front of them at attention. I should have inquired if it was required for me to click my heels, raise and extend my right hand while saying “Sieg Heil”? My one daughter-in-law is from the Czech Republic and has nothing good to say about Germany. Most of the EU can go F**k themselves. Never again will I bless them with my presence or spend money over there.
.
My customary response to covid and other health related mandates applies here as well.
Those who support the continuation of liberty infringing mask and vaccine mandates claim that the mandates are scientifically required, but our rights are inalienable and cannot be infringed upon based on someone’s interpretation of the science.
The argument that mask and vaccine mandates violate personal liberty is a more compelling argument against them than their scientific merit.
Arguing against mask and vaccine mandates on the basis of scientific merit assumes that someone’s interpretation of the “science” could be used as a legitimate excuse to issue a liberty infringing mandate while nothing could be further from the truth.
As British Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said:
“Science will explain how but not why. It talks about what is, not what ought to be. Science is descriptive, not prescriptive; it can tell us about causes but it cannot tell us about purposes. Indeed, science disavows purposes.”
In other words, science only tells us what is. It doesn’t tell us what policies to implement. Mask, vaccine, and other mandates are the result of political science, not actual science.