According to multiple media sources Twitter has reached a deal with the representatives of Elon Musk for the tech billionaire to purchase the social media company. According to the Wall Street Journal, over the weekend the outlines of the deal were agreed and last night the final assembly of the purchase came together.
Keep in mind that Twitter is slated to report first-quarter earnings this Thursday, and originally the board was going to wait until after that earnings announcement to respond to the bid.
Something changed.
My suspicion is the financials of the Q1 earnings report will not support the $54.20 high end evaluation offer originally proposed by Musk.
If the low Q1 earnings rumors are accurate; and if Twitter had declined or fought the offer; the board would have been in the position of declining a deal that was substantially higher than the company market value, a tenuous position legally. Thus, a deal was made.
(Wall Street Journal, update) – “Twitter is in advanced discussions to sell itself to Elon Musk and could finalize a deal Monday, people familiar with the matter said, days after the billionaire unveiled his $43 billion bid for the company.
The two sides worked through the night to hash out a deal that would be valued at $54.20 a share, or $44 billion, the people said. Assuming there isn’t a last-minute snag, the deal is expected to be announced after the market closes Monday, if not sooner.
It’s not clear why the total value of the deal has increased slightly from prior expectations, but it could be related to an updated share count.” (link)
Elon Musk responded to the rumors of the finalized deal with a tweet earlier this afternoon: “I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter, because that is what free speech means.”
Meanwhile, the professional political leftists who use the platform are having a complete mental breakdown. Thousands of them are promising to leave Twitter and find a safe place if the deal goes through.
As CTH has continued to evaluate this entire scenario, the internal tech architecture is the aspect that is the most interesting. As this develops there is a great deal of interest into not just the controlled speech system that Twitter background operators have assembled, but also what underlying tech systems on the platform are connected to the public-private partnership.
We know there is a connection between the U.S. government and Twitter…. the question is, how is all of that being operated?
I draw a comparison between JournoList, the lib-only forum back more than a decade ago, and what Twitter had become. Like with the dissolution of JournoList, with Musk’s purchase of Twitter, the Left has lost a narrative-shaping tool: https://lurker.substack.com/p/journolist-20-is-sold-to-musk?s=w
Musk doesn’t need my advice and…
This is a man who landed two rockets simultaneously ass backwards so I wouldn’t put anything beyond him.
I love watching that!
I’m happy that someone else will be running Twitter, but Elon Musk isn’t exactly a hero of conservative values.
Much of the nest egg he acquired was off the public dime, wasn’t it? I might be wrong, but I always thought Tesla was one of Obama’s pets…like Solyndra. The Boring CO’s Las Vegas tunnel and the tube project are both silly.
I hope he keeps his word and promotes free speech.
If Obama was responsible for Tesla it would have failed long ago.
With great respect, just a thought here … maybe the infrastructure is not as great a cost as we might think?
With over $2b in gross profit perhaps there is enough to keep financing and private equity drinking from the trough.
Maybe the story of Elon, Free Speech, Trump coming back, more users, higher advert revenue etc. has another angle?
Which means the Govt has less (or only) enforcement leverage.
Which could also mean that Elon buying Twitter is doing the USGov a favor. More leverage, a little counter to Truth Social, etc.
I dunno, just thinking out lout.
Creative thinking has been squashed on social media, in academia, etc. for all of my lifetime.
Patent have been issued to a favored few to benefit the few, not the many.
The evil powers in all countries have prevented human creativity from solving the world’s problems.
Creativity is a gift from God that has been stifled.
The cabal has picked winners and losers for all inventions and scientific theories.
Cures have been suppressed.
A free exchange of ideas on twitter is using their information tech against them.
It may well be their undoing, on their own gallows.
Creative thinkers can soon build on each others’ ideas for the first time.
Lies will be exposed.
The powerful will try to shame us into holding on to their ideas because they are “experts.”
No, we will say/shout. Your experts are liars.
How big is this move in the information war.
Let’s see what happens.
Curious. Which social media gathers data for the State Department?
Is the State Dept. facing a FaceTweetGram Gap?
Don’t they all? I kind of assume that.
The melt down on the left is going to be fun to watch. Better get my popcorn…
I’m back on Twitter and hopefully @realDonaldTrump can back on as well. Elon Musk is the man! Free speech is back. Big Tech has taken it on the chin and Musk may very well have saved our Republic with this move with how things were going. Thank you sir!
I have to say that Mr Musk certainly knows how to advertise. It’s all about eyeballs and now he has purchased the largest platform to advertise his vehicles and anything else he sells. I wonder what the ROI will be like.
You answered your own question within your comment. It will be gauged by progress in all his other ventures.
Also, Elon loves to use OPM as in US Tax Payer dollars to do the dirty work in ALL his ventures even..those befitting China Inc.. Consider he is making a play for more of those tax dollars by becoming buddy buddy with the US Government shareholders (co-owners) and/or China Inc. just gained leverage on a major US Media Platform.
Rumors are that President Trump is not likely to return. Twitter is a competitor (no matter who owns it) and part of the rationale for opening his own media platform. Wonder if this had anything to do with twiitter being sold…to set up a short term “competitor” to President Trump’s “open platform”.
Spot on. Don’t trust Musk as far as I could spit him.
Just watching the liberal heads explode as they throw themselves on the floor, clutching their masks if Donald Trump starts tweeting again would be worth the price of admission.
If Trump starts tweeting again, trust me, the left won’t leave…they’ll have to stay so they can trash everything he says.
They never leave….
Can confirm 😂
Putting PTrump back on would be a genius move on Elon’s part.
It would keep the leftists in place on Twitter, and all PTrump would need to do would be to post something controversial once or twice a day.
The drama circus would keep Twitter solvent as long as it continued, while Elon directs the profits into his combined ventures in getting a colony on the Moon and on Mars.
I can see Twitter functioning in combination to Starlink to create a revenue stream to fund his space operations/research.
Look up Neuralink and then look up the definition of transhumanism. Elon musk may be a believer in “free speech”, but he’s not one of the good guys. Stop kidding yourself if you somehow think he’s part of the answer to get us out of this globalists/NWO/ Great reset mess we’re in! He’s what a RINO is to the America first agenda.
Musk has said he doesn’t want to be seen as a messiah. That’s proof positive he wants you to see him as a messiah. And I’m tired of everyone thinking he’s a “genius”. He uses NASA scientists to get into space, and his Teslas are crap. He is very good at manipulating people, though.
I stopped being drawn into the Melodrama, of assigning “White hats” to “good guys” who invariably were going to do OUR work for us, and “finally deliver perp walks” to the “Bad guy” (BLACK hats) back around the time,..oh, the Sessions wars, I guess.
Just as a parent will say “I’m not mad at YOU, but I AM mad at ‘what you did’,,I look at peoples ACTIONS and Words.
I like that Musk is causing the libs to be all upset, I like what he SAID about “free speech” in the Ted Talk, but he hesitated FAR too long, before giving the correct answer.
SHOULDN’T have had to hesitate, to say welcominh speech you abhor, is what free speech is about.
I really doubted his true intent was to buy twitter, I thought it was to expose its true nature.
Surely he is now going to come into direct contact, with the Federal “subsidy” all the Big tech platforms are getting, as conveyed by Sundance.
Will he exploit it,..expose it,..? Will they threaten to withdraw the ‘subsidy’ to twitter, if he truly opens it up to “allow” what they consider “wrongthink”?
Oh, and WHERE will all those libtards GO?
We’ll just have to Stay tuned,..
I hear Canada is nice this time of Reich.
I don’t know what a “genius” is, or whether Elon qualifies. He is a visionary. As such, he’s sometimes right and sometimes faceplants with the rest of us. I guess I’ve become a fan, in spite of some of his glaring character flaws. I wish him luck with Twitter. It was a good idea at one time.
I don’t think Musk uses NASA engineers in his SpaceX program. 114 successful return to launch site of their (SpaceX) first stage booster while NASA has had to delay, delay, and just last week, roll their giant rocket back to their vehicle assembly building to fix more problems.
He’s brilliant amd NASA scientists are glad to work for him and actually get items into space and not be learning crt and Muslim studies
“He is very good at manipulating people, though.”
And that’s all it takes? I respectfully disagree. Study his background. Start early. I’ve seen his very extended interviews on the ytube. I have studied him. He is a very well controlled “Rainman”.
That said, there are a lot of things wrong in the works. I strongly believe that he is trying to push “smart young people” to solve insurmountable problems -nothing wrong with that. It has been done before. WWII is the Analog. It can be done, but it will take a lot longer than it took in the 1940’s. Look into the history of that war and see the expenditures and the sacrifices that it took to win it.
Hint. Forget Mars. Ain’t happening. Not in my lifetime (I’m old) and probably not in his. The obstacles are insurmountable with present or near future tech.
His new Starship is designed to land on Earth. Mars is a whole different story. The atmosphere is in Mars is 100 times less dense than Earth’s. That’s magnitudes of atmospheric braking on descent that they don’t have.
They cannot slow down the present Starship incoming into Mars’ Atmosphere. This means that They are going to have to build huge space stations not only in earth orbit, but around the Moon and Mars as well to store the extra fuel needed. The cost of this type of endeavor would be greater than any other budget that ever existed, ever.
I think he’s just having fun poking at lot of people. And he is good at it. Didn’t get to be the richest man in the world by chance either, which means that not only can he change tech for the better, but he is a great salesman, all with only 180 characters. He gives young people hope, and THAT SELLS.
Could it possibly be that Musk’s purchase of twitter is to compromise the growth and success
of President Trump’s own future social media platforms?
It’s already compromised. A huge disappointment. I quit trying although I signed up the first day. It’s just not worth the frustration. Anyway….PDJT does not post there either so what’s the point?
You have discernment. Very few do, and it’s sad.
Forget about neurolink. Wide scale implementation of that is a pipe dream; at least for the next 100 years.
So for now . . . ENJOY
BRAVO Elon Musk!
Disregard Neuralink and the implications of it at your own peril. Mass vaccination, depopulation, micro-chipping, and social credit scores were once pipe dreams, too.
You lack discernment.
Our only hope is that enough people start connecting dots and thinking for themselves. No matter who you follow and listen to for truth you must still make your own judgements. Jesus was and is the only absolute truth teller. If you understand the need the globalists/elites have to become a god and distance us from the one true God then this all makes perfect sense. Elon Musk is right in the middle of that group trying to play god.
Musk also knows Censorship will be national + international Law in the next couple of years. So why is he using his $ this way? He’s making some Elite Twitter share holders even more ungodly wealthy but for what purpose?
I’m happy to see an African American own Twitter! The D’s should love it! /s
Hopefully, PDJT is allowed back on Twatter.
That would be a great step towards good faith
and I might even subscribe.
He told FOX that he was’nt going back regardless.
Ah, ok.
Good to know.
Thank you
Thought he said he would *probably* not go back.
“Probably not” does not mean “No”.
Did’nt know he said “probably”. I hope he does’nt. Seems that he would know all his efforts for Truth Social would be for nought if he went back. Not to mention a lot of investors for Truth Social would’nt be too happy about that either.
Ok. Just saw a Fox article fr/ today that quotes him as saying he would NOT go back. So looks like he’s made up his mind now- since yesterday when it was “probably”. (article on page 2 of this thread)
If that’s true, I think it’s a bad move.
He’ll be preaching to the choir on Truth Social.
And if TS is going to be like all the other “alternatives” where you have to sign up just to see comments, then a lot of the choir won’t even be reading there.
Seems it’d be better to get the message out on as many platforms as possible, especially when the one you are using restricts users.
Good, he has his own platform now.
He will. He can’t pass up the publicity.
Just as “Truth Social”is about to start firing on all 8. Coincidence ?
No coincidence at all.
And many who were cancelled on Twitter are not going back. It’s a cesspool of lunatics and as per Sundance’s excellent analysis, very costly to run. So how is he going to do that? Perhaps he’s going to run it through his Starlink satellites and avoid big tech and government interference and dependency?
One thing is for sure – Truth Social is here to stay and you should buy DWAC(TMTG) stock.
I purchased the stock at $13.00 and is one of the few I haven’t cashed out.
I think it is down to $35 and change today.
I got in early too. Contemplating buying more. Decisions, decisions
Well, all of this is great. However, I avoid social media. The most I do is post a few inane comments on places like Tree House.
I also do not own a smart phone.
Watch Joe Dan’s most recent Intellectual Froglegs. You will view a video that explains why.
me either Alvin! No post except here off and on, and no smart phone! EVER! I just watched Joe Dan the other day. So fun! Gives me a much-needed break from the doom and gloom!
That cartoon was VERY insightful, more than a little disturbing, as well.
I don’t twatter of faceplant, either.
Hate it when treepers post a link to twatter, and don’t give a hint what it is.
Since most twits are short, wish they would just post what it SAYS,..
Still, if you are ON the internet, they GOT you, whether you own a i-phone or not.
Identical to yourself, Alvin. No social media accts., no internet connection at home, and no smart phone….bare bones flip. I don’t watch/read links to twit, so I have to figure out what posters are talking about. Ppl are always surprised that I’m not on fb.
The less cyber connection I have, the better.
The only reason I joined Twitter in the first place, was because of Trump. I’ve learned so much throughout his presidency,
Red Pilled to be exact. I was banned January 6th along with millions of others, and have since moved on. I follow the flow of information, good bad and otherwise and wish ELON the best with his new venture. However, I won’t be going back.
This is not over. First…this announcement by the Board may simply be a tactic…to draw out those that currently control the Board into covering the Board’s potential liabilities…so that the Board can decline the deal at the 11th hour. Fiduciary Duty is simply a quaint notion. Each board vote is for sale. Period.
So let’s just assume for a minute that the private – public relationship is there as Sundance suggests.
Now that Twitter is private, why would Musk stop Using the public resources as it would be a huge cost to rebuild his own private server farm vs using the feds if that is the case.
And with being private there is no SEC issue if Musk chooses to keep this going.
Yes free speech may reign in the external public square but is it possible the deal requires Musk to continue to allow the data to be harvested on the back end if that is the case?
I’m Afraid the world may never know unequivocally if mankind was snookered by the left in this so called public square. Only Musk will know and I don’t believe he will ever share. I wonder if a no tell clause, if true, might have been part of the selling conditions?
Outstanding. The moans and wails from the blue checkmark crowd will be glorious.
They are all melting down. The same old lame line about leaving if Musk does succeed in the buyout. I actually thought about getting on my never been used account just troll them. Then figured why waste my time on idiots?
My question is if Musk will reveal all the dirty stuff the sleaze that were running the platform have done?
He’d be Arkancided in a New York second.
don’t count on it….. the government is involved…and he will use it and that information for his space program
Just checked a couple notorious libtard websites.
Their comments sections are full of, “I deleted my account.”
So, that’s good. Pissing off libtards always makes me happier.
If those are the same libs that promise to leave the country each time a Rep. wins the White House, I wouldn’t believe them.
I offered to drive up to Hollywood and help Cher pack… fat chance, she ain’t leaving.
Speaking of Cher..
Is she tweeting today?
Hope alot of celebrity blowhards delete their account…
It’s pretty interesting listening to what the 3 Business channels, Bloomberg, CNBC, and Fox Business, have to say about this. FBN is the only one that’s not “stuck” on the Twit News right now.
What could be a more laudable motivation (to all but the autocratic left) for acquiring TWTR than expanding free speech in the “public square?”
Especially if it’s true (if not primary?) And if it has the side benefit of dominating (distracting?) the public discussion surrounding the acquisiion?
Surely dramatically expanding Twitter’s already massive “firehose” data production is simply a happy add-on to the leading producer of electric vehicles.
A coincidental emolument to a person who has suggested that today’s obstacles to self-driving technology would probably be overcome in two to three years.
Who has noted that the highway system designed for visual cues would need to be replaced by a different system. Say, a cyber infrastructure capable of massive instantaneous data processing.
Not that subsidization by a certain governmental entity would be seen as trivial.
Which entity happened to observe such a person’s interesting recent use of Starlink in a western neighbor of Russia. And which entity might wish to remain on friendly terms with such a person.
Not that control of a satellite system capable of pinpointing such vehicles anywhere on the globe and sending/receiving telemetry for such vehicles in real time would be of particular interest to such a person.
Nor that such a person would even be intellectually on top of such telemetry. (Although it could be that dabbling in space-flight avionics could provide some carryover application.)
Free speech IS a beautiful thing.
Any bets now that Musk owns Twitter that McConnell, McCarty and Graham led the procession of looking into removing Section 230 protection on social media companies now?
Most of congress is owned by tech lobby. Should schumer and many others even be allowed to vote on such things when their children work for these co. Schumer has 2 daughters . One works for fb. And the other I think for google
There wasn’t a problem until just a few minutes ago—-White House press secretary Jen Psaki on Monday said President Joe Biden has concerns about social-media companies’ power after Twitter’s (TWTR) board agreed to a sale to billionaire Elon Musk.
https://mobile.twitter.com/RevShark/status/1518678384976580609
Did you all miss the part where he will require ID to verify if you’re human? The bot problem will be solved but at the price of Musk owning your biometrics. Not worth it. I’ll stick to Gab.
Twitter has dominated the Social media field for nearly a decade. Elons purchase will level the playing field a bit more.
‘I use several different platforms, GAB, GETTR, Truth Social. I see a lot of the same users cross posting, so there’s really no sense in going back to Twitter.
I like verifying all accounts. It will take away the elitist status of the Blue Checks and will add accountability for all posters. I have always posted under my own identity. Freedom requires responsibility.
How will this dynamic work if Twitter is supported by the gov and Musk is the new owner when their interest don’t seem to be in agreement. I’m also curious how or why Musk would be willing to fund a business that Sundance says is a money drain. I just have a hard time believing he’s doing it solely in support of free speech which hopefully I’m dead wrong because we need more rich people willing to throw sand in the machine.
Attention please! At promptly 12:00 a.m. tomorrow, all leftists shall howl at the moon.
If this is true you can bet some serious shredding, hard drive wiping, bleach byting etc is going on right now
1000%
It’s a honeypot. Musk makes the deal look good to those fearing censorship. Everyone is invited back in , they feel comfortable on the platform as far as what they can say and nothing actually changes. Except even more info is gathered on you to be used against you at a later time.
It also comes with the bonus of countering Trump’s new platform.
Never trust Musk. He owes most everything to the government.
When James Woods, Trump, and so many others are back then I might think about using it
People thinking DJT will go back on twitter… I doubt it.. Truth Social up and running and easy enough to navigate.. So, why would President Trump go back to a site that is now a competitor of his??
Exactly. The time and money spent to get Truth Social up and running, Trump will not abandon it.
Nobody’s saying anything about Trump abandoning TS.
My goodness , he was on several different platforms before the banning sh*t started.
To get his ideas out there to more people?
Just wait until VSG PDJT starts truth in within the next 7 days.
Got a link for TS?
I want to see how easy it is to navigate thru for people who don’t have an account.
Or can you share a TS post here w/ us?
Thx.
I would love to but haven’t a clue how to share a post from TS… I pre-registered a month or so ago and was on a waiting list… I was 1.5MM (LOL)… However, few days ago received a notice and boom I’m on!
Doubt you can *navigate* sans app or joining… just like all others. Try “truthsocial.com”
Because the libs will not be likely to use Truth Social and I think it’s important that Trump reaches into lib minds and tweaks them.
Maybe because he had between 80-90 million followers
Free speech isn’t part of the left’s agenda. Narrative control, lies, twisting facts, omitting relevant facts, etc., all become more difficult to maintain when opposing views and truths are expressed along side of them. Debating ideas and concepts is healthy. Arguing is not. Which will this acquisition bring about?
The Leftisphere is going bonkers because “Progressive” Democrats need to control what their subjects see & hear today for the very same reason Southern Democrats didn’t allow their slaves to read & write 160 years ago.
I think a lot of this is just Elon loving the limelight. He always does things in a big way that draw a lot of attention. He sent a rocket or something to the moon, he introduced the Tesla, when the kids were caught in the mine he came up with the little submarine idea to save them. He loves the spotlight. He has some ideas of free speech but I’m guessing that wasn’t behind his idea to buy twitter. Look who has all the news and drama the past few days, Elon Musk! It will be twitter until it gets old and he will be on to the next bright and shiny object.
Did the “poison pill” strategy by the board of directors work, did it backfire, or it didn’t make any difference?
In view of the ‘done deal’, should the complete board of directors resign en masse? Let the new guy Musk a complete do-over?
What good will a Free Speech Owner be after Censorship becomes official national + international law?
I believe that Trump has insinuated that he won’t go back on Twitter. It would go against his interest for Truth Social to succeed. Twitter is a competitor to Truth Social and Trump will want control of his own brand. Therefore, Trump’s social media presence will be via his own platform under his control.
I’ll be glad when he gets it going because they’re currently trading TWTR like it’s 9AM.
I am not a fan of Musk as he is too dependent on government for much of his revenue. Carbon Credit trading, tax breaks for his EVs, etc. are unnecessary misplaced Musk and liberal green welfare. His SpaceX partnership is probably a bit better as he is actually producing a needed service for which he deserves payment. However, he does seem to be throwing sand in the gears in the social media world, which as SD advises, is a good thing. We can’t look for perfection in people we support. If that is our measuring stick, even PDT doesn’t measure up (vaccines and some of his endorsements). That said, on balance, PDT is the best. We should be judging and supporting people’s actions. When someone is doing something that throw sand, we should support those actions. When they don’t, we should oppose them and speak out. At this time, I am glad Musk looks to be successful and taking the right actions. If he truly opens up Twitter and makes it a platform where we can speak our message without being censored that will be great. We can use it to expose the greenie (and Musk) stupidity and corruption.
I still believe there will be a win-win for Musk and his government partners. Not sure if it will be enhanced data gathering and mining, getting his green business promoted, and probably increasing his government supported revenue stream. That said, it will be interesting to watch.
Go Froglegs…….Let’s go Brandon……and FJB.
I am quite sure whatever is going on with the Twitter purchase is far over my head soooooooooooooo I will just sit in the nosebleed section of the bleachers and watch, hope and pray that it is a positive move.
The last 2 paragraphs are the crux of this whole saga. US Govt is US Intel Comm. How does Musk deal with them? How does US Intel deal w Musk? What is Musk’s end game? Does he blow the lid off this “partnership”/”control” of free speech?
What a timeline we live in!!!
With regard to the Congress revoking the Section 203 Protection for Twitter, I think you might be surprised that Elon Musk has already taken that into account. It is now a private company and he will undoubtedly be insured up to the hilt.
Consider that a poster may be considered as content provider/ producer as food products would be to a grocery store. Twitter being a privately owned store. The store provides the product but the producer of the product is alone responsible for the ingredients. Lawsuits would only then be applicable to the product producer. In other words the poster accepts liability for any and all statements they make.
If a poster is just posting an opinion fine. But, those statements that are portrayed as fact but untrue, watch out.
I wonder how the propagandists will handle that. Just think how many lawsuits President Trump could launch from that. Watch out Adam Schiff..
Two things,
1st twitter was losing money hand over fist, potentially, and the 54.02 share price is a high premium for Musk to pay.
2nd the technology & infrastructure issue will become a huge problem for the Federal Government if found to be true. Things are about to become interesting.
We know there is a connection between the U.S. government and Twitter…. the question is, how is all of that being operated?
*Methinks there’s even more to the Gov’t/Twitter partnership than meets the eye even for Treepers. I remember R Limbaugh discussing how he hired IT people to track I.P. addresses from Twitter posts, and he found that a small group of uber Leftist professors (15-20?) were creating news/propaganda and attacking private companies by sending out avalanches of twitter comments on controversial subjects.
It seems like a good bet that these alt-Left professors, and others like them, are being coordinated by the DNC/S0r0s/DCStasi etc?
Cass Sunnstein
yep, and the “msm” is able to use the excuse that so-and-so topic is “blowing up Twitter”, so that they can instantly mix so-and-so topic into the news cycle.
Thus the importance of authenticating humans.
Not to discount anyone’s opinion on CTH, but I want more Sundance opinion. As I posted earilier, what is Musk’s end game?
fastrock: Musk’s end game is not your end game. You’re welcome.
I’ll try to get back on Twadder if for no other reason than to relentlessly mock Demonrats
Musk sounds white hat-ish.
If he does acquire then I was wrong about the govt not letting him have it.
A Musk black hat scenario could be “free speech” long enough to crush all the other social med’s and then re-implement censorship.
The swamp WILL strike back, though.
What part of the management and workforce will Musk NOT have to replace?
You (and I) may be overestimating the savvy and power of the DC Cartel? “Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity”— Hanlon’s Razor
Headline! “Billionaire buys sewer.”
Mmm, more like the breakup of Bell System squared:
Headline update “Billionaire buys sewer. Promises to make it smell better.”
RESUME – COVER LETTER
Until April of 2022 I was employed as a “fact checker” at Twitter.
I believe that these are excellent qualifications for the role of Customer Service Agent. If anyone made a complaint against your company, products or services, I would simply delete or (at your option) “correct” the post. In this way, your company could truthfully say that “we have no record of anyone having complained about our company.” 🤡
I wonder how he’s going to make all that money back and a profit?
I smell an “if.”
Well done.
Falsebook next?