Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, MIT PhD, was part of the forensic audit group that looked at ballots in the Maricopa County audit of Arizona. Expanding his review, Dr. Ayyadurai also provided a mathematical and pattern analysis of mail-in ballot requests and mail-in ballot return rates in Pima County, AZ in 2020 U.S. general election.
What Dr. Ayyadurai discovered is quite remarkable and would seem to prove that specific precincts within Pima County were used to dump ballots into the county election system. The average rate of ballot return in Pima County was 87%. However there were 40 very unusual precincts with more than a 97% return rate of mail-in ballots, and there were two precincts that were over 100% rate of return. They counted more ballots than they shipped.
What Dr. Ayyadurai discovers {Direct Rumble Link Here} is that once Pima County precincts passed that average ballot return rate (87%), the precincts above 92% then shifted massively toward Joe Biden. It would appear several precincts scanned Biden ballots more than once, OR, several precincts participated in ballot dumps from mule harvests. It is a very compelling presentation. WATCH video starting at 25:36 to save time:
.
President Donald Trump draws attention to these findings by Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai with a public statement – READ HERE
NOT surprising, at all. Pima county has a long history of liberal activism, especially in school districts.
And, it has Tucson, second largest metro area. I thought it should have been audited, from day one.
Willie Sutton said he robbed banks “cause thats where the $ is. Dominion focuses on big, metro areas, cause thats where the votes are, or at least where they can make big dumps, to change the result, without it being as obvious.
I really don’t know how anybody can believe Az (or other States) are truly “purple”, since it is based on suspect polling, and suspect voting.
ACTUAL, legitimate votes, Az may be RED, and we just THINK a bunch of libbies, from Cal etc moved in and turned it purple,…
Truth freedom and health .com
thanks
ok now what
Nice presentation but it does nothing.
Anyone with an objective brain knows they cheated. You have to prove it and it seems that we’re not focusing on that or that we simply cannot prove sufficient fraud to change the final vote tally.
Here in the Jan Senate election in GA, the same thing happened–both R’s were ahead until the wee hours of the morning then a surge of Democrat votes pushed the D’s into the lead. Trump noted in his Jan 6 speech that they watched how they did it—they (election officials) can track who did not vote–they see how many votes they need to win, then they “generate” enough votes from those who didn’t vote to create the margin of victory. How they generated or created those votes–the fake signatures, the 500 different addresses with the same phone number, etc. should be caught in a forensic audit.
There were 17,000 duplicate ballots in AZ. Why were these not separated and removed from the actual count?
Showing all these voting anomalies is interesting but we’re way past the point where this is useful. It must be shown that a net of 11,000 of invalid votes went to Biden to flip the election. That’s the ONLY way to get media attention and possibly inspire other states to perform the forensic audit due diligence to check their final vote tallies. Not diminishing Dr. Shiva’s work, but this is just urinating against the wind.
Doctor Shiva has a bit of the crackpot to him, but he does find some interesting patterns. He noticed a linear pattern where it appears votes for Biden were manufactured in heavily Republican districts. The inference was votes were stolen from Trump in places where they wouldn’t be missed, instead of 78-22 Trump it might only be 69-31 Trump.
I’ve never seen anything that proves Doctor Shiva’s analysis, but it was an intriguing find. And it goes hand in hand with an analysis that says President Trump’s support collapsed among … suburban whites? That seems very, very doubtful to me.
No Proof? There is enough proof of fraud, security breaches, and plain cheating to overturn the 2020 election.
This makes 0 sense. The names of everyone who voted is public record. If what you were saying is true, all it would take to blow the lid off the whole thing is publishing the list of names of everyone who voted on a website. Then anyone who didn’t vote could see if there name was on the list. If you had thousands of people claiming they didn’t vote but their name was on the list of people who did, game over.
I have never seen any convincing proof of vote flipping algorithms or hacking to change the counts.
I have, on the other hand, seen PLENTY of proof that the Democrats used mail-in voting to stuff the ballot box on an unprecedented scale.
I still recall a Twitter thread, some guy confidently predicting that President Trump’s margin of victory would be so huge the Democrats wouldn’t be able to manufacture enough ballots to stuff the boxes needed to get Joe over the top. He mocked those who were concerned about it, and I remember his summation: “F**k your fear.”
Oh, that didn’t age well.
Just the lack of security of the ballots is enough to void the 2020 election results.
Someone needs to follow the $950k zuckbucks Pima county received. I was on Pima Board of supervisors and voted against certifying 2020 election. Have since been told prevoted ballots mailed out by nonprofit requesting receiver to simply sign and send back to Pima recorder office.
“PREVOTED BALLOTS”… OMG. Why aren’t you blasting this from the rooftops???
Because there’s zero proof of it, just “someone told me that…” which while it may be true, is easily swatted aside. Big claims require big proof.
No offense to Ally, but the administration of US elections is a complete clown show. People who would be barely qualified for a job at McDonalds are counting our votes — take a look at any major urban center. Do you see shining examples of civic responsibility? Chicago? Miami & Broward Co? Atlanta? Phoenix? Milwaukee? Minneapolis? California? I don’t think so.
Let’s get to brass tacks: why are so many election workers black & brown? Who is hiring them? Why? Well let’s start with the fact that civil service workers and their unions are all left-voting by huge margins (80%+).
Some of the election workers are not even citizens, as happens in California (hell, you don’t even need to be a citizen to hold certain state offices in CA). All these people hired have blatant political interests and biases. Illegals want citizenship, and one party promised it to them. Blacks vote 90% Democrat, year after year and blacks have a far higher criminality rate than any other race. They are also disproportionately reliant on government largesse. Do you think ex-felons should be excluded from being election workers? Because they aren’t excluded by nearly all state laws. How about those with misdemeanors, even serious ones? Not excluded. How many urban black election workers have criminal records? Statistically speaking, the majority do.
The game is stacked exactly how the left wants it. The corruption, inefficiency and opacity is all by design. Nothing changes until someone takes control (from the right) with an actual will to power.
Democrats and RINOs are fighting tooth and nail to suppress any evidence of election fraud. If President Trump is returned to the WH now or in 2024 many of these cheats will pay with their freedom.
Empty Shelves Joe’s policies are such a disaster the Democrats will need to commit even bigger fraud next election cycle. I am not sure they can overcome the backlash from the voters this time again. At least this is my hope.
“They will pay with their freedom”.
Will they? You mean like Hillary “Lock Her Up” Clinton did after Trump was elected in 2016?
I’ve said it before, and I will say it again every time this comes up.
President Trump‘s original blunder that set the trajectory of his entire administration was not following through on that promise to appoint a special counsel to investigate Hillary Clinton’s email server. If he had done that, then all the conspirators would’ve been on the defense from day one and wouldn’t have had time to engineer the recusal of Jeff Sessions, or the Mueller probe, and Crossfire Hurricane would’ve been uncovered immediately 2017 instead of continuing for another 2 years.
President Trump extended the olive branch, and they used it to beat him up.
Oh here we go bashing President Trump. How long do you think the “special counsel” would have taken to say just like you say of the forensic audits did that “They did not find any convincing proof” of maleficence?
we know there was plenty of damning evidence in plain sight. Devon Nunez took one look at it, turned white as a ghost, and made that statement to the press that he couldn’t believe what he just saw. Then the Democrats immediately neutralized him with an ethics investigation.
The thing is, this was not a personal beef between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. It was an assault on our Constitution and our republic. It wasn’t for him to forgive and forget. The crime was committed against all of us.
Yes, the crime was committed against all of us – and still is, every single day. The lawlessness, unconstitutional orders and actions, the HORDES of illegal aliens, the uncounted #’s of completely unvetted Afghanis who are now just walking away from the military bases they are housed on, the killing of the $US, the intended debt slavery of every single one of us and our progeny for generations with the passage of even one of these multi-trillion dollar bills, etc., etc., etc.
The machines and routers would answer a lot of these questions. Nobody hires 79 lawyers to try to prevent an audit of “the most secure election ever.”
I can envision a scheme where the Democrats first need to know how many ballots are needed. Then, they adjust the counts in the machine; lastly, they deliver the required paper ballots to match the count they just fudged.
that would tie in everything we know about the irregularities. Servers that were not supposed to be online, connected to the Internet. The late night scramble November 3 and fourth to get truckloads of ballots delivered where they were needed. And the cessation of normal counting activities that recommenced in the wee hours of November fourth.
If they now have it narrowed down to the precinct level, canvassing those specific precincts should be easy enough. Mark Finchem has been working down there for a while so maybe it’s already started. But we are running out of time!
The election fraudsters know this to be true as an essential fact ….. if you can successfully inject the number of fraudulent paper ballots you need to win — doing so either before election day or as soon as possible just after election day — then a simple recount of those paper ballots done later on as part of an ‘audit’ will always show that you won.
The audit of Maricopa County fell far short of expectations for these reasons:
1) Suspicious paper ballots were not individually flagged and identified for further physical examination and analysis. The images of suspicious mail-in signature envelopes were not individually flagged and identified for further examination and analysis.
2) A full voter canvass, as was included in the original audit plan, was not performed . A full canvass was necessary as another line of persuasive evidence that fraudulent paper ballots were likely present among the full inventory of hardcopy ballot material that was being examined.
3) The Maricopa County election system’s electronic hardware and software was not examined nearly to the extent that was necessary for the audit to be called a ‘full forensic audit’.
Remember, a simple recount of the hardcopy ballots is not enough to demonstrate that election process discrepancies have occurred which might involve fraud. If you are counting ballots with no corresponding analysis of each individual ballot, and of each individual mail-in envelope, to detect the possibility of fraud, then you are not doing a full forensic analysis.
My opinion is that if external access to the electronic systems did indeed happen, it was done primarily for the purpose of monitoring the progress of the election in real time to see where it was heading. If Biden’s count was falling short of what was needed, then the vote fraud coordinator in a participating tabulation center would direct that additional fraudulent ballots be injected into the election system after the polls closed.
If, at the time the polls had closed, not enough fraudulent paper ballots had been injected in the days before the election to swing the vote to Biden, then more paper ballots would be needed in the hours following the close of the polls to make up the difference.
From a criminal investigative perspective, it is not enough to rely on extensive statistical analysis to demonstrate that fraud has occurred.
What is needed to close the gap between what is mere hypothesis and what is bankable evidence of election fraud is something we might label as ‘corpus balloti’ — what you get from examining the individual physical ballots themselves and the individual mail-in envelopes themselves.
The piece of rope needed to tie it all up in a nice neat investigative bundle is to bounce what is found from examining the individual ballots and the mail-in envelopes against what is to be found in the data gathered from the voter canvass.
Without both pieces of the puzzle in hand, then there isn’t bankable evidence to prove beyond shadow of doubt that criminal election fraud has in fact occurred.
“Fraud” need not be “verified” for the electors to be decertified or nullified. Way more than enough “irregularities” and disregarding of strict State and Federal elections laws HAS been proven that decertification/nullification is the ONLY LEGAL action to seek a remedy.
I was a member of Pima board of supervisors. $950 k in zuckbucks came in 1 week after election. Allegations that nonprofit mailed prevoted ballots. I voted NO on election certification. Surprised no one ever inquired why 2 BOS members voted against certification.
As I replied to another of your comments… If this is true, THEN WHY AREN’T YOU BLASTING THIS FROM THE ROOFTOPS???