The U.S. Supreme Court has again overturned the national eviction moratorium imposed by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). In a 6-3 ruling [pdf HERE] the court has rejected arguments that the CDC is permitted to arbitrarily enforce an eviction moratorium. The high court notes such a government mandate would have to come from the U.S. Congress, not an unelected bureaucratic agency.
This is the second time the eviction moratorium has reached the Supreme Court this year. In June, the court allowed the prior version of the moratorium to remain in place through July. However, on August 3rd the CDC arbitrarily renewed it for two months. This time the court halts it. “It strains credulity to believe that this statute grants the CDC the sweeping authority that it asserts.”
From the majority ruling: “It is indisputable that the public has a strong interest in combating the spread of the COVID–19 Delta variant. But our system does not permit agencies to act unlawfully even in pursuit of desirable ends. Cf. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U. S. 579, 582, 585–586 (1952) (concluding that even the Government’s belief that its action “was necessary to avert a national catastrophe” could not overcome a lack of congressional authorization). It is up to Congress, not the CDC, to decide whether the public interest merits further action here.” (link)
GOOD !!
This ruling should be applied to EVERY so-called ‘ agency ‘ that has been created by slight of hand, pen-stroke and an assuming of authority that is not granted by law.
Many seem to operate on the ” since it was not challenged long ago …. it must be O.K. ( legal )
Not So.
Now can they do something about that INSANE Gov. of Oreygone who believes we should all live like Chinese coolies wearing masks outside and riding bikes …
As well as their ridiculous imaginary vaccination passports
unless you come to the US illegally them gee whiz where would you like to live for free no shot not passport oh and would you like to vote.
Wont work here in Oregon. This idiot governor just ignores US constitution and Oregons.
She thrives on her dictatorial power. With a supermajority of dems in the legislature and most state offices she can do as she pleases.
While most of rural Oregon is still conservative, the urban areas are overwhelmingly liberal/radical.
And.then there is the matter of state wide mail in ballots for all elections.
And who counts them.
The people are allowing and accepting. Stand up and tell her no. It is over, stand in the face of any government agent who tries to apply force, fight back.
I live in Grants Pass and law enforcement here will not enforce the idiotic outdoor mask mandate.
Except in the Autonomous Zones. They get to live free.
Oh but that’s up to the states, except it isn’t.
I hate being government’s shuttlecock.
The same should hold true in states mandating shutdowns. Not collecting rent and not being able to run your business are both confiscation of wealth.
Takings.
Like the BATF
Sometimes ‘ agencies ‘ usurp power. Sometimes they trick the people into giving them power.
This is an excellent research tool that begins to explain all that from a Christian perspective.
FAMILY GUARDIAN
famguardian.org
Not good enough. They should have to pay damages to the landlords
Just in time to make room for the foreign border jumpers
Biden doesn’t care about Supreme Court rulings with which he disagrees. Expect he’ll ignore it, assuming he’s in office long enough to do so.
Don’t think he will be, to many veterans pissed.
Getting time to mobilize the power of American vets.
If Pedo Joe continues to defy the Supreme Court, he may awake someday from a nap only to discover that the Supremes have finally recognized that Texas has standing.
Trump’s restoration to office will be glorious.
Im a Trump voter but Biden is not going anywhere he could not have won without the help of the republicans. Biden is funded by Bush you want him gone you need to blow up the phones of your governor and senate and the rino McConnnel
Biden didn’t win.
Fraudsters and cheaters are not winners. Other than that yeah, call people who will not listen .
This had nothing to do with the Wuhan Flu and EVERYTHING to do with redistributing wealth and destroying the middle class.
….and we are heading to a dictatorship.
Fight like our lives depend on it. They do!
Clivus Multrum: Agreed! As well as utilizing yet another manufactured and/or greatly hyped crisis to implement policies that are inimical to U.S. law and American values.
Wuhan virus research on these viruses was started in the US by Fauci. He moved it to China, he funneled government funding to Wuhan lab. He’s ultimately responsible for the virus that was unleashed on the world — he should be considered a mass murderer! Note, he was also involved in the vaccine work before anybody hear even heard of the Covid! He was a Dem plant in the Trump administration, and is riding high in Biden’s admin. He’s also on the patent for the vaccine, so he gets a portion from the sale of each and every vaccine — hardly an innocent researcher! He’s great at lining his own pockets, and lying to everybody!!
Estimated 80 trillion dollars owned by America’s middle class, that the Red/Green axis of evil is salivating to get their claws on. The Great Reset is on, folks……it is up to us to stop it!
Anyone who says something like this doesnt get it:
“It is indisputable that the public has a strong interest in combating the spread of the COVID–19 Delta variant.”
When I read that I can see how very dark days lie ahead of us.
What we the public want is to be left alone. The public wants its liberty back.
Supreme Court failed US. It would have never gotten this far if the rightful President was in office.
Yup, I read that the same way: we know what’s best for you, and we can do what we want. As long as Congress erases your property rights, not the CDC, it’s good.
It’s not only about property rights; some Americans are deemed essential and other Americans are deemed non-essential according to public official nutjobs. Hubster is considered essential, he caught it from a co-worker and brought it home to me. Both hubster and his co-worker were masked and distanced when hubster got it. So much for public health idiots advice and stopping a virus (which can’t be done). The vast majority of people who get covid recover just fine! Everything about covid and public health concerns is BS!
Just wait until the Justices figure out there is a link between sex and pregnancy.
If government does something for the public interest then they have to tax to pay for it. You just cannot take somebodies stuff and say it was for the public interest. Yet that is exactly what the government did.
Yep. Note to the Supreme Court. The public ALSO has a string interest in honest and fair elections.
Just a reminder.
GOD HELP US! IF IT BE THY WILL.
They only removed this seizure of property on a technicality. That the CDC could not predict who might be forced to move, and therefore spread COVID.
We are one study, one model, one lie, away from the CDC discovering that yes, they do have that ability to predict the future.
Good catch, because wasn’t this whole thing based on a crazy “model”, which failed to accurately predict the future, but is still in use anyway?
Why aren’t they holding the CDC and Biden in contempt of court as a result of their previous ruling??
Kavanaugh’s comment in the first moratorium ruling gave the CDC enough wiggle room to argue that this was a new and different moratorium, so the prior order wasn’t being addressed, and thus the CDC had not disregarded a SCOTUS order.
Crazy how experienced and adept they are at getting around the law “for the good of the people”!
Not only that, there is now no one who will hold them responsible, make them suffer any consequences.
They didn’t even get a month. Lol
That is funny. Biden’s handlers never thought it would get fast-tracked.
And SCOTUS just told them to reinstate the “remain in Mexico” policy for “refugees.” Of course, whether Biden will obey the “remain in Mexico” order remains to be seen.
I’m a landlord. I try to keep the rent I collect as affordable as possible for my tenants. Luckily they are all working and are paying. The government should not keep landlords from taking legal action against tenants who do not pay. Let the tenants plead their case in local court and let the legal process work. Face it some tenants don’t want to pay if they don’t have to.
My dad is a landlord too, in Florida- all his tenants have paid- but I don’t understand how landlords are supposed to do fixes without the income of rent? The gov sux at life.
PS- was their ever a mortgage moratorium where the banks ate the losses?
Precisely. Or a tax moratorium where the government did with less? I know, it’s laughable and infuriating.
I applaud your efforts.
As you have noted some tenants will try to live rent free given opportunity, pretty sleazy if you ask me. Just reveals a lack of good character honestly.
Admittedly the government has no small part in it due to all the lockdowns and all making it much more difficult for everyone to make an honest living these days.
I think this whole thing was just a way to cause small landlords to Cry Uncle and give up.
It’s been pretty clear over the past few decades that the push has been on for huge Rental Property Conglomerates.
Bingo, Sunnydaze!
Black Rock buying up scads of properties for rentals.
Because you’ll own nothing and be happy!!
Notice the people cheering for a private business’ right to “require” you to present a government passport (excuse me, but that’s government requiring it, because the business didn’t issue the thing, government did), are conveniently ignoring the fact that government first went out of the way to destroy as many private businesses as possible?
My parents are landlords as well and have had no refusals to pay . They also keep the rent affordable and have long time tenants who appreciate it.
Justices Breyer, Sotomayer and Kagan were the dissenters in the ruling. Fairly predictable with the specifics of this particular suit.
And the claims that there are no unbiased judges in the entire Federal Judiciary falls flat once more.
It would never have made this far otherwise.
These 3 disgust me – I do believe Sotomayer is the worst and should never have been allowed a seat on the supreme court.
At least Breyer refuses to retire yet, keeping the Squad from getting Stacey Abrahms’ sister or Ovomit from being nominated to the Supremes.
She was the Solicitor General arguing ACA before SCOTUS and then after she was confirmed and it showed up again she rendered judgement…both she and Ginsburg performed gay weddings and then were a part of the same-sex marriage decision
Just pray that they stay for 3 more years and then Trump gets to pick who he finally wants, not what Cocaine Mitch wants,,
Leftists love to give power to the Unelected.
See- Fraudci
“nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”
-5th Amendment
When did Congress get the authority to change the constitution with simple legislation?
That’s Harvard Law (and plagiarist) Professor Lawrence Tribe’s “living Constitution.”
I’ve been right up in front of the Constitution in the National Archives in DC. I never once saw it move or take a breath. And it hasn’t sprouted any additional paper. Plus, it’s inside a sealed case filled with inert gas. In other words, it’s not living.
Amendments can be added and can be superseded but none can be removed.
So Congress will add the moratorium to the 5 trillion infrastructure. Easy peasy
And, declare, oh my, I didn’t know…
Kavanaugh learned his lesson. And Roberts jumped in to be with the majority (optics).
Kavanaugh said he could go either way on this issue, despite acknowledging the CDC had exceeded its authority. The guy is wishy washy.
How do you know Roberts voted with the majority? I read the court ruling and I didn’t see anything he wrote on the issue
Do you think Intel community has something on them ? I think I do.
I think Roberts voted the way he did to spite (maybe “spank” is a better word) Biden, and not because of any constitutional concerns. If the WH occupant hadn’t been so openly arrogant about his intentions (i.e., stall or slow-walk the appeals process), he might have even gotten away with it in today’s ruling. But Joe just couldn’t help himself.
That’s probably the case.
Biden defied their previous ruling, so it became personal.
And student of history Joey will ignore it again. And Trump was impeached for a phone call.
The scum of the earth will now have to go back to work so they can pay their rent or else they move back in with mommy. Whoever made this BS ruing from the CDC should be forced to pay those property owners what they lost financially.
They may have to go back to work, anyway, as those extra COVID unemployment benefits expire on Labor Day (in the states that didn’t already cancel them).
A significant number of states have already ended their PUA and PUEC programs, some did back in July. One question to ask is are those workers returning and, if not, why not?
As far as the eviction thing goes, the Communists started it by messing with our lives and our busineses beyond their usual graft and corruption schemes. They and their collaborators in the financial industries will get what they get. Can’t wait to get started on those cockbag narcissists.
Merry Christmas, axxholes.
“But our system does not permit agencies to act unlawfully even in pursuit of desirable ends.”
Except when it comes to curtailing religious freedoms protected by the 1st Amendment, the guarantee of privacy protected by the 4th Amendment, the right to intra-state travel protected by the 4th and 14th Amendments, the right to free and fair elections, and the right to decline experimental m-RNA therapies.
But at least private property is protected, for now.
You know what’s depressing?
That not one of the three remaining liberals can look in the mirror and say, “I’ve seen what extreme liberalism has done in the area of domestic and foreign affairs. The more left the policies enacted are, the more violence flourishes domestically and internationally. I really need to re-think my view of people and what motivates them, what liberates them and what represses them.”
After all, almost all Constitutional scholars knew what Biden did was unconstitutional, but the clung to politics.
You’d think Biden’s folly and all the danger it presents to us in every way would finally knock some sense in one of them.
No, they remain no different than politicians.
I always had a bit of hope for Kagen. There’s some common sense there, but a thick armor of fear of social isolation, I suspect, prevents her breaking out of the tightly spun web of progressivism.
No I think Kagan is a blooming commie
I was going to say the sane.
So how to the landlords that couldn’t evict non- paying tenants due to this unconstitutional ban get all their rent back?
Can they sue the government for unconstitutionally imposing this?
As I understand it, the tenants were not excused from the legal obligation to pay rent. If they didn’t pay, the landlord couldn’t evict them. So the landlord could get a lawyer and sue for the back rent – from the tenant.
likely those taking advantage of the “moratorium” are the uncollectable types…other than attaching a judgement that cannot be collected the landlord has time and expense on a helpless Don Quiote mission…they will certainly find future lodgings more difficult and most likely rent, security deposits, and background checks will become more punishing on future renters
Good luck trying to collect.
I can’t find the accessment page from CDC I saw over a year ago but it was a plan for pandemic housing arrangements. They wanted to be able to change housing arrangements around to move people from one home to another depending on infection rate. Horrible, moving people out of their homes to a home that suited the infection rate. We have to keep a sharp focus on the revival of the AHHP bill. This would destroy the suburbs immediately. It can never pass.
This is not a surprise. Grandma went APE-S**T when a census worker asked how many rooms she had
” in case of emergency need to relocate people “….. she called sever lawyers and never spoke to the census again ( and they knew well enough to leave her alone )
That could make an interesting Third Amendment case – the Third prohibits forcing citizens to take in soldiers except in time of war, and Congress must authorize that even then. I can see the Biden administration arguing, “But they’re not soldiers, they’re civilians.”
If they’re being forced on my home, that makes them unofficial soldiers in the Fed’s war on the citizenry, and they’d better be better armed than I am or they might be casualties in that particular war
The last census worker I had to talk to about 11 years ago got an earfull when they asked how many toilets we had in our house.
When I worked the 2010 Census, we did not ask any of those types of questions.
Was this a commie controlled city or state? Would be interesting to find out who authorized those types of questions, in which states. The commies never stop.
Unlikely that it was decennial census. Much more likely to be a survey targeting housing starts or housing improvements. It was likely legit.
When I was 2000 office support, we had every tenth form replaced with a long form; standard was 4 pages, long form was 12-20 pages, depending upon whether it was from City or rural residency.
Tell them you have 1 and a big hole dug in the back of the garden
test
It’s too late. Democrats and bureaucrats have already used the “but it’s a pandemic, the health code gives us unlimited powers” loophole to great effect.
They have banned private business. They have locked down churches. They have banned assembly. They have used corporations to carry out their agenda (which the Court has always maintained is unconstitutional, but not for covid!). They have rewritten election laws illegally using the covid excuse.
So the court comes along a day late and a dollar short. Did they even bother quoting the alleged head of the Executive Branch who said specifically that the ruling was illegal but he would do it anyway?
Did they chop Biden down for breaking the law willfully? No! They said it was an admirable goal.
I think they were saying that generally, there is a legitimate public interest in the preventing the spread of the disease. But the method used to pursue this interest was unconstitutional in this case.
But there isn’t a legitimate public interest in the President knowingly issuing an order he knows is illegal…
They also don’t seem to have mentioned the Takings clause of the Constitution. It’s not like Congress can order the forced occupation of private land without just compensation.
“But there isn’t a legitimate public interest in the President knowingly issuing an order he knows is illegal…”
No, there isn’t a legitimate interest in illegal orders, but there is in preventing the spread of contagious disease. Biden did claim “some” legal experts said this order was different from the last one, and he based his case in SCOTUS on that slender reed.
Illegal is illegal. And, 99.9% is all I have to say…
There’s a vast public interest in free abd fair elections but they ognore that one.
Why is there a “legitimate public interest in the preventing the spread of the disease” in this case. For past viral infections the “public interest” has been in protecting those at greatest risk from the “disease” while at the same attaining herd immunity as quickly as safely as possible? Why has common medical knowledge and ‘science’ changed only regarding the current CCP-virus pseudo-pandemic? It is by accepting these underlying twistings of the narrative that paths are left open for future infractions.
Wethal: Except, that’s not what they said.
They recognized there was a legitimate public interest in preventing the spread of COVID, a contagious disease. There were other legitimate interests in this case, too, the most obvious being the interest in protecting private property, so important an interest that it gets mentioned several times in the Constitution (5th Amendment, 14th Amendment, prohibition on states from impairing contracts, and protecting patents and copyrights.) The CDC had not authority to infringe on the private property interest.
No interest is absolute (My right to free exercise of religion does not permit me to engage in my ancient Scandinavian ancestors’ apparent practice of human sacrifice).
” They have used corporations to carry out their agenda (which the Court has always maintained is unconstitutional, but not for covid!).”
And on that point, Joebama is BLATANTLY, OPENLY and AGGRESSIVELY calling for private business to do “their” (fed gov) /Biden’s dirty work of mandating the covid vaccines for employees.
As this has never been allowed before covid because settled case law, precedent to other similar flu/pandemics, and the good ole Constitution. The communists forced major great reset with covid. This all needs to end because it’s evil. People must sue, hold the line. Let employers fire you.
awesome.i know a couple people that were getting screwed out of rent by people that were spending their unemployment like drunk sailors yet they didn’t get a dime.
It seems like everyone does. I also know of a number of landlords with a small number of rental units, who were forced into selling or foreclosure.
This ruling comes way too late.
On the face of it, you implement part of the Green New Deal by claiming that someone going through the process of eviction might, just might, be sick with the COVID?
Last I heard, you could stall an eviction if someone in the home were seriously ill.
Zero need for the federal government to intervene.
This happened under the Trump administration. The Biden administration merely refused to end it when told to.
The people who support dems have their rent paid by the government, so I don’t even know who this affects.
Section 8 vouchers may not cover the whole rent, although I’d guess that such tenants live in some pretty cheap places. The tenant has to pay the difference.
The vouchers vary by income but are generally a significant portion of the overall rent, so much so that landlords in the program love that government check every month.
Interestingly, when the press covered the 30,000 supposed evictions prepared in Clark County a month or so ago, that’s the Las Vegas area, they also stated that the majority of them were for Section 8 homes and apartments. However, I haven’t seen much since, definitely no blood running in the streets.
With massive evictions, not just for rent but also foreclosure, who will then live in those domicilies? The homeless? It’s not like people are living in cars waiting on a place to live, generally, it’s a fluid marketplace. Will someone evicted be able to find housing again with an eviction or foreclosure in this combative environment? There are evictions all the time, just not massive amounts of them throughout the nation like apparently are going to happen over the next few months.
Funny the Supremes get right on this but election fraud and the Covid op and draconian measres against citizens, they’re mute. Federalist Society doing what it does.
‘Rent Cancellation Advocate Rashida Tlaib Cleaned Up as Landlord During Pandemic’
https://freebeacon.com/democrats/rent-cancellation-advocate-rashida-tlaib-cleaned-up-as-landlord-during-pandemic/
“Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D., Mich.) collected up to $50,000 in rent payments last year, even as she publicly criticized landlords and supported an eviction moratorium that has hurt other small landlords.
“Tlaib—who in December stressed the need to protect Americans from “landlords and bill collectors in the midst of a pandemic”—disclosed in an annual financial statement this month that she took in between $15,000 and $50,000 in rent on a Detroit property.
“Tlaib is not the only “Squad” member who has raked in thousands of dollars as a landlord. Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D., Mass.) collected up to $15,000 in rental income in both 2019 and 2020 through a Boston property she owns, her financial disclosures show. Like Tlaib, Pressley slammed landlords for collecting rent during the pandemic, calling the issue “literally a matter of life and death.”“
When the time comes, will the Supreme Court have the courage to evict Joe and Kamala?
Courage? Nope, they will get a phone call from their coup leader minder who will inform them how to vote.
it is PAST time and they have FAILED in their duty at least twice I am aware of deciding NOT to hear the merits
The installed cadre of faculty lounge lemmings never understood, “As the government produces nothing, it cannot give to one that it doesn’t take away from another.” Always arbitrarily picking winners and losers. Law of unintended consequences is universal, but those elites do not and will not listen nor comprehend.
Reminder – this was also a mortgage foreclosure moratorium. Now banks will be foreclosing on landlords and homeowners who haven’t been paying, and companies like Blackrock will scoop up lots of properties in short sales or auctions.
They will then turn all of those single family homes into pricy rentals.
That’s in addition to all of the properties they have bought up at above market prices in order to turn them in to rentals.
Or Blackrock will knock down a group of houses on contiguous properties, and put up an apartment building.
IIRC, the reconciliation bill included a provision that to get federal HUD funds, local governments had to change “single-family dwelling” zoning laws and allow multi-family dwellings in all neighborhoods.
This was to bring in large numbers of city Democrats into the more Republican suburbs, to take over those white, GOP suburban congressional districts.
Blackrock buying up properties “at above market price” is helping to keep my real estate holding from crashing in value, as happened in 2008.
And their “pricy rentals” will keep out the riff raff, like the deadbeats who welched on their lease obligations.
Briefly, I see few downsides to this court decision.
Hey Supreme Court! How do you feel about unathurized agencies changing voting laws right before a Presidential election? Think that might be important? Thought so.
OK now do the BATF.
That might happen if Clarence Thomas were to be replicated 8x.
Do “the Three” ever vote for the Constitution?
What’s amazing is that there are three Supremes that actually agree with that nonsense. Let me guess who?
One of the Powerline lawyer-bloggers had a great comment. Biden himself admitted the CDC order was unconstitutional. Three justices said it wasn’t.
Thus, Biden understood the Constitution better than they did. Dementia Joe….a constitutional scholar?
I actually hate that ruling. Instead of saying it is unconstitutional, they said it is not based on statutory authorization, and then the just about told Congress to pass a law to do it.
disgusting
They are recognizing the general police power to protect the public that the Congress or state legislature would have in an extremely contagious epidemic.
If there was a plague sweeping the country, like the Black Death (bubonic plague) did in Europe for centuries, you could be exposed to someone with the plague just by him breathing near you in the morning, and be dead yourself by sundown.
There is no pandemic clause in the Constitution.
The mayor of New York City calls US Supreme Court justices “right wing extremists.”
Ahhhhh…… yes , but are the SC also ” Raycissss ” ?
LOL
Only 6 of them.
Buck Fill de Blasio
does the supreme court grow a spine? If only they had it during the election. The outcome would have not been different. what a travesty.
Would have been…ughh.
The CDC was told before by the Supreme Court that what they did was illegal. They did it again after knowing it was illegal. That makes those, within the CDC, that did this should be arrested as criminals knowingly breaking the law! I know, the Dems don’t seem to have any problem with breaking the law, but this went directly against a ruling by SCOTUS!
“The three liberal justices dissented, citing a rise in Delta variant cases.”
One simple question for these 3 CORRUPT morons in black robes:
What does it have do do with the UNCONSTITUTIONAL STEALING OF PRIVATE PROPERTY by a bunch of unelected bureaucrats ??
They live by “COVID vitiates everything”.
I wish they would live by fraud vitiates everything.
The court in its language not only legitimizes, but fully endorses appeals to combating “the spread of the COVID-19 Delta variant” as a basis for legislating. Ridiculous.
This is an often ignored power of the court – the sleights of hand, and the people’s fecklessness in looking the other way. The sleights of hand curiously only seem to work in one direction – against the people and goodness.
The Founders failed to consider the human implications of allowing room for these kinds of political games in a polity, games which the court’s only function today is to play.
It is at least more dignified and less alienating to live under the boot of an evil tyrant who can always be trusted to make no pretense to represent you, than to live under the boots of evil tyrants whose pretense is to represent moral goodness.
Is it now OK to ask if we can evict the squatters from the White House ?
Yes,please!!! Lol (You win the internet for today imo!!!!! ?)
Gawd NY, get rid of this guy.
…” It is up to Congress, not the CDC, to decide whether the public interest merits further action here.” ….
DeBlasio couldn’t even be bothered to read the ruling before spewing his BS.
Typical Lefty.
“This is an attack on working people across our country and city.”
Working=income=paying obligations
Now do masks
The Deep State must have a lot of rental properties falling behind.
As a landlord, our family had resorted to only signing short term leases (3 months) with tenants, so that we could reclaim our property from tenants for other reasons than non payment of rent. Also, tThankfully, we lived in a state that allowed us to do this.
I would hope if Congress passed a moratorium, SCOTUS would find it an unConstitutional takings. Shoulda mentioned that in their ruling
Breyer Kagan and Sortomayor dissented
Tells you something-either they doesnt understand the Constitution or they in their pockets and dont own any rental properties
Every piece of human trash that could have been paying rent all along should have been. They deserve to be homeless
Good, now do the 2020 election. ( Ya kinda got some blood dripping from your hands there right now, ” Your Honors”)
This is what happens when you have an “out of control federal bureaucracy” , accountable to none, with unlimited powers.
6-3?!?
Indeed. Dems always have the courage of their convictions while we play nice-nice or lie about who we are or celebrate diversity or cross the aisle or whatever other losing strategy we employ. They are much better at politics than we are. That’s a backhanded compliment however it does matter no matter how much we’d simply like to be left alone.
Scary that three Justices are of the opinion that external events can nullify the protections of the Constitution and empower one person to control all lives in the country.
Those three judges always vote as block and are leftist ideologues. Their opinions have nothing to do with the constitution. None of them should be on the Court.
Why was this even in place in the 1st place? They handed out $$$ like it was candy. Extra unemployment, other checks, etc.
“How many divisions does the Supreme Court have?” ~ Joe Xiden
Exactly. And I think Nancy Pelosi has asked the same question about the American people.