Many reasons present themselves as to why the Senate should seat President Trump’s nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg as quickly as possible. Heading into an election season without the full complement of justices could prove to be a nightmare scenario. Nobody wants a split decision on the Supreme Court with the election in the balance.
Fox News – “It will be a woman. A very talented, very brilliant woman.” Trump said. “I think it should be a woman. I actually like women much more than I like men.”
The commander-in-chief opened his rally in Fayetteville, N.C., by paying tribute to the late justice, saying “you may disagree with her, but she was a tremendous inspiration to a number of people, I say all Americans.”
Trump told reporters before boarding Air Force One to North Carolina that his pick would likely be announced next week.
Trump said the current situation is different than in February 2016 when a seat was vacated by late Justice Antonin Scalia. “That’s called the consequences of losing an election,” the president said.
He noted her close relationship with late Justice Antonin Scalia, which he called a “powerful reminder we can disagree on fundamental issues while treating each other with decency and respect.”
Trump also asserted his right to nominate a new justice before the election. “Article II of the Constitution says the president shall nominate justices of the Supreme Court. I don’t think it can be any more clear, can it?”
A chant broke out among the crowd multiple times throughout the night: “Fill that seat, fill that seat.”
“It says the president, we’re supposed to fill the seat. That’s what we’re going to do.”
Trump also told the crowd he would now consider his rallies protests. “This isn’t a rally. From now on it’s called a protest,” he said. “Protest against stupidity.”
Trump said that a Supreme Court seat was vacated during an election year or prior to inauguration 29 times throughout history. “Every sitting president made a nomination,” he said.
President Obama nominated Merrick Garland for the seat, but Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., in 2016 used his caucus’ numbers to hold the seat open until after the election. …MORE…
Wowser what a time to be alive! Fill the vacancy; fill it now!
Test them and pick the one with least cancer genetics and a history of matriarchal longevity
You mean Keith Richards nim?
Excellent, witty reply. Congrats for coming up with that line.
Woman= confirmation
Hispanic woman= confirmation + reelection
Save the lecture. Its time to play identity politics and win. Save the most qualified white male. Just win baby. The 3 never trumpers can then abstain and its a 50-47 win. Take the win and save the intellectual purity. We need a win. Trump and Mitch already made a deal and a pick. Get the win and its 4 more years.
SMH. Again. You don’t get it.
The people who play identity politics won’t be impressed by a conservative Hispanic woman any more than they were impressed with the selection of Clarence Thomas, a conservative black.
I dunno
How old is Keith’s mom ?
Does pre-mortem pharmaceutical mummification even count?
Doris Maud Lydia Dupree Richards died in 2007 at age 92 according to what I found to the web.
I said it last night myself. And the DIMs will look like big meanies if they don’t celebrate the pick of a woman when they have allegedly spent the last 4 years exalting women.
They’re STILL exalting women
They’re circulating a meme of a supposed question put to Ginsberg, “how will we know when there are enough women on the supreme court?”
I didn’t click to see the answer, I was put off enough by the framing I passed right on by
Spoiler Alert: “When there are nine” ???… I don’t know that to be the true answer, but knowing RBG, that is my guess….
She said it should be all nine as women….. clearly the best remedy for past injustices is to perpetuate new injustices forever. That’s how leftists think.
They keep pushing the future is female meme for a reason. Look at how that slogan is everywhere.
Keep an eye on Bachelet in the UN, Markel and Hillary. Big plans there.
its gonna be bananas. if DT does follow through on nominating a woman, what are they gonna do? accuse her of being a whore in front of millions watching the confirmation process?
Yes, that is what the Democrats will do.
Look what they were saying about Sarah Palin, and she was just the VP nominee. It will be no holds barred for a Supreme Court Justice with a lifetime appointment.
Exactly. We must believe the women. The men must sit down and shut up…
What no rape trains????
This definitely takes the Blasey Ford crap out of their playbook. Don’t worry the Dems are scheming since they can’t play the woman card. What the Left does here will be so revealing for the public…it may destroy them with suburban women voters.
Guess they’ll have to go to Nanny gate.
Beach friends hardest hit.
Well, they can always hire Smollett to invent something. He must have gotten better at faking since the last botched race hoax. The Nigerian Brothers could use the money. Smollett will cry and everything… He will show up in the Senate floor with the noose still on neck from 20 years ago when the incident happened.
It’s not -16° air temperature, -28°windchill.??
Yes, but they lack a certain something (can’t place my finger on it) for acceptance,
Oh, and we need to mourn! = )
They don’t care about identity politics when it comes to conservatives. Look what joe Biden and his democrap cohorts did to Judge Thomas with his Anita liar Hill interrogation in front of the world. They totally humiliated Judge Thomas. They should have been ashamed but sociopaths are incapable of shame. They didn’t care that Judge Thomas was a black man. They trotted out their sex stories and once again, the media was in bed with them. They just brought in a black traitorous woman to accuse him. Shoot, knowing the demonrats and their love of porn, they’ll probably bring a lesbian out to accuse the judge, represented by Gloria Allred.
That being said, I’m tired of his propensity to keep picking women. Conservative women are not usually looking at identity politics. Their looking for people to uphold our constitution. We have sons and husbands too, that we don’t like to see sidelined for this insatiable identity crap.
“As for my people, children are their oppressors and women rule over them. Oh my people, they which lead thee, cause thee to err and destroy the way of thy path”. Isaiah 3:12
Nice scriptural reference there Contrarymary, and the left being sociopaths, nailed em both!
Disagree. The Left isn’t deterred by sex or race. They’ll openly and unashamedly attack, denigrate and smear the character of any white or minority woman if she doesn’t wholeheartedly support either Roe or Obergefell, and especially if she’s a strict constructionist..
Remember….
-Abortion is the Left’s #1 holy sacrament. (I’m talking “pentagram holy” here…)
-Gay Marriage is their second most “holy” sacrament.
-Acknowledging Critical Race Theory and Systemic Racism is their new litmus test
-Gun control is up there, but they know better than to attack it head on. They’ll sneak up on it until they get all three branches under their control. Of course at that point the USA as founded is gone.
You’re absolutely right.
And these suburban white women they keep propping up for votes better wake up bc they will soon be left in the dust for WOC the same way Black Americans are being left in the dust for the larger Hispanic demographic constituency.
White suburban women who vote Democrat are useful idiots.
Suburban white women need to wake up and recognize
what the BLM/communist/Marxist movement is doing
to their sons. Emasculating men began with Oprah
if I am not mistaken; at least that is when I first recognized it.
Yes, GB Bari, you are absolutely right. Playing the left’s intersectionality game never works. I find it sad that so many of us on the “right” have bought into the left’s idea that sex, race, national heredity, etc. are of the utmost importance in judicial candidates, when their qualifications, judicial records, and philosophies should be the only things of importance. We decry politics in the courts and then apply political considerations to selecting judges – what do we expect?
His choice has been leaked as Barbara Loaga, a Cuban/American who is 52 years old. But I suspect there is careful consideration of what the Left could bring up in terms of personal history. ANY candidate will turn down the job , f there is the slightest chance of going through a kavanaughing, I suspect.
I think she’s feisty enough to give as good as she gets.
They will rip her and her family to shreds, however, with their family
history of exiling from Cuba, they have survived terribly horrible
situations before; all in the name of “liberty”. I like this choice on
the surface. However, is she for or against illegal immigration?
Oh, I know they will attack whoever he picks. Let them. Let them display their hatred once again for the whole world to see.
Yes.
Maybe, but I really think the current radical Left is all about ideological purity and will tear down *any* person who doesn’t kneel and genuflect to their orthodoxy.
GB, you just surprised me. Your post suggests there might be a “conservative” nominee who wouldn’t be vigorously flayed. I’m not familiar with that radical Left.
GB Bari,
The only one I can think of who ticks all those boxes is Amy Coney Barrett.
But she asserted that will recuse from any case involving any issue on which the Vatican has issued official policy. That entails at least two of these issues.
4-4 split assumes Chief Injustice Roberts will vote with the deep state.
Oh yeah, Chief Injustice Roberts is Deep State!
He only became deep state at the time of his confirmation
he has a closet full of secrets .
If you can’t be blackmailed you won’t be confirmed.
Senators only publicly humiliate the untainted .
The ones with skeletons (like Ms Lindsey) are very pliable.
trump learned this – in a readers digest version with kavanaugh.
furtive,
Cliff Note version, However PDJT is a quick study??
I saw a meme today that said : Trump
Could finish the wall with all the bricks that Democrats are shi**ing. ???
To counter the whiners:
Three Supreme Court Justices Were Confirmed In Less Than 45 Days, Including Ginsburg
https://thefederalist.com/2020/09/18/three-supreme-court-justices-were-confirmed-in-less-than-45-days-including-ginsburg/
Senate has confirmed 17 #SCOTUS justices in presidential election years
He put a contract out on Scalia -thought it was early enough to replace him. Mitch knows this. It’s the swamp, remember ?
He escaped justice as he did with trump spying .
Brennan likely spearheaded it as he did the obama /soetoro/shabbazz as passport break-in & trump spy ring.
Obama will murder again . The ends justify the means.
This is a very dangerous time for Trump.He must prepare for all consequences.
He has changed the course of history & obama & his sugar daddy cannot handle it .
Trump ’s HD antennas should HANGING OUTSIDE On the WHITE HOUSE ROOF!
There is definitely a plot being planned to incapacitate Trump
A narrow window is very dangerous
My tuition is deafening
Psychopaths believe they will never get caught.
If anything happens to Trump it will be open season on all sitting Democrats. Surely they know this. If they are obsessed enough to try, there won’t be anything left of them down to the family dog. Conservatives just want an opportunity to vote for Trump. This IMO would be the final straw
Those were Rectangular Bricks, eh? Meeting Mil Spec ? Ah. I see.
“Masonry Units, Triple Fired: Tungsten Carbide Corners, Quantity 8, ‘
Yeah, That’s gonna tear a sphincter or two.
Lol Cowboy! Treepers are the best!
Yes Cowboy,
We should have known the Mason (bricks) would be involved.
Absolutely, Tiff. Looks like POTUS has six ways from Sunday to confound and neuter Dims and he does it with ease
I really think it will AC Barrett. She will be tough to slam. 8 kids, including 2 adopted from Haiti. That’s impressive.
Who are the other women in contention is it isn’t Amy Coney Barrett? Does anyone have the list handy?
Yes, there is Cuban judge from Florida. But she was only nominated to that federal court very recently, so I doubt it’s her. SD has both of their pictures above.
Okay- that is who I was assuming was the other one pictured but I do worry a bit about someone who is so new to the Federal Judiciary. Might give the squishy Senators an out to say that she just isn’t “experienced” enough. Can’t say that with Barrett and one assumes there will be no 30 year old rape accusations but I’m sure the Left will come up with something!
Barrett is Catholic. Very Catholic. They are apoplectic over that.
Ad Rem did this article.
ok
Sundance is up to something and it’s gonna be great.
Can’t wait! ?
FIRE CRACKER TIME!!!!!
List here:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/09/09/president-trump-announces-potential-names-of-supreme-court-judicial-appointment-video-and-transcript/
Thank you so much!!
There are 8 women on the President’s extended list. So fat only two are being discussed here by posters. Maybe take a look at the others would be helpful.
Of course a good look at everyone on the list would be useful.
Naughty WP. So*far* ?
?
??
That was a joe Biden autocorrect. Listen, fat LOL.
I’m joe Biden and I forgot this message
I wonder if the obvious Anti-Catholic bigotry might sway a few moderate old school JFK era Democrats?
Are there any JFK Dems lift? I can’t think of any off hand.
Blue Dogs have all been neutered…
I suspect they’ve all “walked away”. This isn’t the Dem party of JFK. He’s probably turning in his grave.
“Damn few an’ they’re aw deid.”
Yet they vote.
Lokiscout, my dad is a jfk dem. He’s voting for Trump ??
My comment was Dem politicians. There are a lot of JFK Dem voters. I suggest many of them will be, like your Dad, voting for President Trump.
Omg, my bad. ??
No worries! Communication is a delicate art at best!
Screw that wuss. lol
Yes, we DO need to give the Democrats exactly such an opportunity. The American People need to see it, in all its revolting bigotry.
YOU GO, Ad Rem!
Barrett for the WIN!!!!!
My prolife heart is overwhelmed!
Ganesh says:
(Upon hearing critiscism Trump was oblivious to RGB passing while giving his rally).
Yeah, but he replied with grace and poise when he was on his way to AF1 after the rally and was informed of the Notorious RGB passing.
=============
Here are the choices, IGO, for nomination from his list (1, 2, 3, and 4 are ranked in order of likelihood, the rest are options):
1) https://spectator.org/amy-barrett-immediately-if-not-sooner/
2)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Pitlyk
2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martha_M._Pacold
2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allison_Jones_Rushing
Pacold clerked for Thomas, Pitlyk clerked for Kavanaugh, Rushing clerked for Gorsuch and Thomas. Pretty clear President Trump asked for recommendations. All these potential nominees are in their forties. Legacy nominations.
Rest of the Pack):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Lagoa: (Cuban-American, gives President Trump Florida?)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amul_Thapar: Unlikely because he is a man, but would be a huge first, and the guy is already a huge first, in the Indian-American community. Read his bio. Awesome story.
Probably too old to be considered, but would do a superb job):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridget_Shelton_Bade
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allison_H._Eid
https://law.pace.edu/commencement/honorary-degree-recipients/hon-margaret-ryan-us-court-appeals-armed-forces
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_S._Sykes
President Trump has already announced he will put up a nomination, and McConell has already said he will bring it to a vote. So, we will see how that works out.
Ganesh
The American Spectator article/link you posted on Amy Barrett is excellent. #FillTheSeat
I am surprised they haven’t torn up Louisville yet. Guess the night is still young.
Each Paid with helium
It should have been ACB last time…not KavanNawwwww. Just look it up…?
I agree. I was one of the few here who did not like Kavanaugh as a pick due to his ties to Bush and his work on the unconstitutional Patriot Act which violates the 4th Amendment.
I even wonder if the entire shite show we saw was all theater to get reluctant conservatives to support him bc he was under since intense and insane attack.
Kavanaugh isn’t a conservative. Gorsuch isn’t a conservative and Roberts is definitely not a conservative. They alternate siding with the libs for plausible deniability if their leftism.
Yup.
7 kids, but who’s counting? Yes – 2 adoptions… Clearly a horrible, evil person… Word is she played hooky once in her sophomore year in high school and lied about it… The Moonbats are readying the smear campaign.
I hear they are going to smear ACB with allegations that she is Transphobe and didn’t take her kids to dragtime story hour.
The adopted kids from Haiti will raise a lot of eyebrows with many voters especially the QAnon constituency. Given the Pope’s stance on open borders her religious views concern me too. I hope she’s an E Michael Jones Catholic otherwise she may vote as liberally and be as compromised as Roberts is with his shady adoptions.
That anti-Catholic nonsense should just be dropped. I dont know a single Catholic that listens to everything a Pope says to begin with, orthodox or heterodox.
Just religious bigotry, Mr. Jimmy NewHere, so please let it go.
Read what Barrett has said herself, before chastising another poster. Jimmy Jack had good reasons to post his comments – and those reasons all relate directly back to Barrett. I don’t want anyone on the SC who will recuse herself/himself over a conflict of interest with one’s faith.
DiFi will accuse any Catholic of not being unbiased because of their Catholicism. How does a mom of 8 kids perform as anything but Mom?
Ted Cruz has the best chance of fast Senate approval for many reasons. Also, he can fight back! Republican TX Governor will replace him as Senator with a conservative.
He said he is not interested. And PDJT said it will be a woman.
What is he hiding that he won’t survive confirmation? Just curious.
I think Cruz is probably hoping for PDJT’s job in 2024.
Cruz is not constitutionally qualified and he KNOWS it.
Hence the irony that his name is even mentioned for SCOTUS.
And unlike Coney Barrett, he’s not burdened by some middle-headed idea that his religion requires him to recuse himself from some cases because of supposed church teachings that favor open borders and against capital punishment. For the record, Coney Barrett’s church (which is mine, too) does NOT teach explicitly against capital punishment or in favor of open borders, but even if it did, a scotus justice’s duty is to the US Constitution. If she thinks she has to follow church teachings over the constitution she has no place on the court. It’s even worse when there’s an antipode poser like Bergoglio around.
* muddle-headed
* antipope
I was trying to figure out if antipode was an insult.
Scalia was a devout Catholic, and he didn’t recuse himself from cases involving abortion or same-sex marriage or anything else based on his religion.
But Barratt said she would do so, recuse herself, so she’s not the right pick.
Check out Barbara Lagoa. Confirmed 85-15 in 2019 by the Senate.
Cuban American from Florida.
Yes, if it’s gonna be a woman I vote Loga, um I worry about devout Catholic’s and their tendency to be influenced by Church teachings.
Church teachings are promoted by religious leaders who certainly can’t be trusted due to the fact they err as all men do.
We simply need someone who demonstrates they have faith in God and are guided by that faith as opposed to following after denominational teachings.
Alto’ it would refreshing to see a strong person of faith from the evangelical group for a change.
Fionnagh,
Do us the honour of quoting where Mrs Barrett – this ‘dangerous’ Catholic – said she would recuse herself?
Thank you.
Scalia was smart. At least half of the country’s Christians are Biblical Christians not bound by Catholic teachings. No Catholic Justice would dream of disenfranchising them.
What is your source that ACB said she would recuse herself because of something a pope may say?
Cruz does not want it; stated publicly this week on Fox News and elsewhere.
POTUS stated tonight he is appointing a woman.
Last night at the rally PDJT joked that he put Cruz on the list knowing he would be confirmed 100-0. “The dims want him out of the Senate!”
Abbott is a Bushie and a Rino. He has Texas on more of a lockdown now than in the spring.
Abbott see that’s a Texas will turn blue and acts accordingly. He’s a snake.
Lockdown? I just went to Ikea in Houston tonight. Parking lot was full.
Ate at a local restaurant. Parking lot was full. In fact, at ALL the local restaurants starting Friday, the parking lots are ALL FULL. Even the line at Popeye’s is long, even with no dine-in and social distancing.
Lockdown? I don’t think so.
Teddy bear Cruz shouldnt be trusted on the SCOTUS. He was willing to try to throw the 2016 election to Hillary for his own 15 minutes of fame. @NeverForget
Go with the Cuban! Let’s see the Left go after a Cuban American woman with full fury! The thought of that makes me chortle!
If Hispanics ever had a question about Dems supporting them, that will be dispelled by the viciousness with how the Left will go after this woman nominee!
It’s a chess move that pretty much hands the election to Trump. Three Supreme Court Justices in one term. An amazing record. RBG was counting on the insurance policy but that failed, Trump won and now he gets to tip the balance of the Court to the Right and wrest control from John Roberts.
And the GOP Senate? Does Collins vote against a Cuban woman nominee? Murkowski? Romney from Utah? I don’t think so. This nominee may very well get unanimous GOP support. Trump wins all around! No wonder he was in an especially good mood today! MAGA!!
Here’s the wiki on Lagoa
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Lagoa
Thank you for that. She is well admired by FL and the American Cubanos as a talented Jurist.
And we would get a second “wise Latina” on the bench…
There’s no wise Latina there now.
Good one! I’ll second that!
SURELY IS…WIDE LATINA …….
Danged WordPress! Keeps changing it to ‘wise’.
;o)
We would get the first “wise Latina” …..
… on the US Supreme Court, I mean!! Of course I did not mean that as dismissive as it may imply…. only referencing Sotomayor as less than “wise”….
Also more than wide!
She would be the first….
Sorry — I should have put a “sarc” tag on — I thought the quotes sufficed… 🙂
A wiser one!
She’d be the first one.
Wiser Latina.
According to Shannon Breem, the brilliant Cuban woman from Florida has an all-too-familiar story of escape from Cuba. Her father gave up his dreams of becoming a lawer in order to get his family out of Cuba safely. She is all too familiar with socialism. She is married to a lawyer and they have 3 daughters.
Lack of enough federal court experience would potentially be a problem, but again, she’s not had enough time to become the typical swamp creature.
Appointed by JEB!!!!!!
But also appointed to the Florida Supreme Court by Gov. Ron DeSantis.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article224069530.html
He should be so proud….. (NOT!!)
Please clap
i thought RBG was a pretty light candidate.
I would love to see Kamala go after her like she did Kavanaugh.
I like the Cuban judge. They hate socialism. She would be the only one on the Court to actually understand what the heck is going on with the democratic party.
She experienced extreme socialism in Cuba, i.e. communism. For me it’s her, hands down. She is a blank slate, but Trump appointed her to the 11th Circuit quickly for a reason. Sometimes you have to go with your gut.
I think Barrett might be too PC to help evangelicals or the country.
Recusing herself from religious/moral cases? Why then are you on the Supreme Court?
Excellent points. I was unaware of her previously.
And you’re right about ACB. She’s no E Michael Jones Catholic. If she’s in lockstep with the Pope she supports open borders and amnesty. And if she refuses herself, the Pope has interjected himself on so many issues she’d never actually write a decision.
As a Catholic, I agree with you, noswamp.
My gut feeling is indicating the same thing. Not so much about being PC, but we don’t need anyone else who’s going to recuse themselves from doing their job.
Both women are pro-life. Well, we’ll see soon which one it is …
She was born in Florida; her parents escaped Cuba.
However, I am sure she heard the stories from them
so is an anti socialist/communist/Marxist which is
good enough for me since that is what we are fighting
against.
There is no requirement for a SCOTUS nominee to even be a judge. Hence the Dem’s wet dreams of a Hillary or Obama judgeship.
And if Kamala Harris was not chosen as a VP candidate, she would be on the demosocialists’ justices list and that is extremely frightening considering she is the most extreme leftest, even worse than Bernie Sanders.
Plus, Kamala is not the sharpest tool in the drawer, having flunked the bar the first time (like Big Mike Obama and Crooked Hillary). Tulsi Gabbard ripped her a new one at the debate…Hooker Harris stood there with mouth agape, speechless.
I like the Catholic woman w seven kids.
Diane Feinstein does not like her at all because of her Catholic faith and having children..
check out her senate hearing.
JINO..FEIN STAIN DO NOT LIKE CATHOLIC JUSTICE…NO SURPRISE THERE……
Chinastein does not like anyone religious.
I about spit my drink out. Chinastein.
Ditto, JJ. ?
I like her as a person, but how are we going to like her when Fake Pope Gomer pretends the Green New Deal is official Catholic teaching and Coney Barrett thinks she has to recuse herself from all environmental law? Or when Fake Pope Gomer pretends that all Christians are supposed to favor gun control?
A very astute question has been raised….
It is time to nip this “recuse” nonsense in the bud right now.
Look where it got us with the President’s first AG.
Amen!!!!!!
You keep making this allegation but never citing your source. Why?
https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1307500834104717312?s=20
I’m 100% with PDJT, I like women a whole lot better than men.
Hah!
I don’t like identity politics. I do however appreciate him trolling the left and the Churchianity pearl clutchers.
Just ordered mine!
The President said they would get that shirt up and running quickly- Trump time it is! ?
So he pulled a Biden? Seems like a 2020 thing to do.
Please don’t pick the WH lawyer. Stay away from anyone in DC.
I don’t think Harriet Myers is on the short list LOL
I hope he’s not talking about Lindsey Graham.
LOL!
CoHoBo??
???
Well, we do call him Miss Lindsey around her often. LOL
RBG, Obama, History, Precedent, Customs of the Senate, all demand that PDJT nominate candidates and Senate confirm one. All this Liberal Blather means Nothing.
RBG: https://dailycaller.com/2020/09/19/ruth-bader-ginsburg-supreme-court-pick-2016/
Obama:
History: https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/08/history-is-on-the-side-of-republicans-filling-a-supreme-court-vacancy-in-2020/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
Biden team just put out a message on a t-shirt.
…wait…I’m dating myself here….
“Bork Bork.”
I believe that it has become a verb as well: “Kavanaugh almost got totally borked during his confirmation hearings”.
I was actually kind of too young to pay attention to that unseemly episode of history when it was happening, but I got the gist of it later. I believe that was when the demoncrats began their new tradition of slandering conservative candidates and running them through the media wringer.
Please do yourself a favor and read Bork’s brilliant book Slouching Towards Gomorrah. It will explain a lot of what is happening now and why he was sabotaged.
Thanks. I just ordered it.
(The following is not a serious suggestion, just an engaging fantasy)
I’d like to see President Trump raise the bar for lib/prog apoplexy and nominate a fearless conservative warrior woman: Kayleigh McEnany. For the record, she does have a Harvard JD.
I don’t care how good McEnany is, no more Ivy Leaguers.
I get it — especially for the Senate confirmation hearings. (Or as Monty Python would say, “NOOOO-BODY expects the Spanish Inquisition!!!”) Can you imagine her facing off with Kamala? Or any of the other Dems with their “gotcha” questions? She’s a take-no-prisoners type who would mop the floor with them. (My other fantasy suggestion for the hearings would be Judge Jenine Pirro!)
According to betting site Smarkets.com here are the current implied odds to be President Trump’s next Supreme Court nominee, based on the current betting odds. Ted Cruz has already said that he doesn’t want the job, so he is not on this list:
Amy Coney Barrett, 43.86%
Amul Thapar, 6.45%
Britt Grant, 5%
Allison Eid, 4.5%
Andrew Napolitano, 6.06%
Charles Canady, 4.5%
Thomas Hardiman, 9.09%
Steve Colloton, 6.06%
Raymond Kethledge, 6.06%
Joan Larsen, 7.41%
Oh, lordy… Andrew Napolitano at 6%?… What a fraud ??… Someone is putting a match to their money.
Yep. PDJT already said that Napolitano begged him to be on the list and PDJT said no. Anyone betting on that should take their $$ and buy the waterfront lot that I own in sourthern Nevada.
He is being sued for sexual misconduct….by a guy. Oh Lordy. ???
I was aware of the suit but wasn’t aware it was by a guy!
Napolitano has never been married. He is a traditional Catholic, i.e., opposes Francis.
It happened in NJ so I wouldn’t be surprised is that story wasn’t leaked in this incredibly well timed fashion by Kushner or a Kushner operative. Timing is perfect.
Well said! Couldn’t agree more!
And the guys…maybe next time.
How about none of the above?
Where do I place my bet for Barbara Legoa?
Same, joe.
Think the left and their smarmy lawyers are “gathering” the male beach friends as we speak….
Count on it.
Not to be a wise arse, but if “the eyes are the window to the soul”, the woman on the right … … well … … I suppose “silence is golden” … …
That’s Barbara Lagoa. Her eyes crinkle when she smiles. Why is that a problem?
Janice Rogers Brown
Yes! I second that.
I like her libertarian views, her deep belief in separation of powers, and especially her advocacy of Lochnerism.
But she’s 71 and retired from the circuit court in 2017. I don’t think she’d accept an appointment now, and she couldn’t be expected long on the bench if she did.
I cannot help but sit here tonight and think about how opportunistic this SC nominee and appointment is for President Trump.
I personally hoped for another SC appointment during this first term- it transcends regular “politics” despite how the MSM wants it to appear (melting faces on cnn ALL day!).
I am worried about the cohesion among the “republicans”, but If there is none – this is not the fault of President Trump, rather RINOs in action! NOW would be the time to VOTE AT LEAST TWO OF THEM OUT! THIS should be apparent to those running again (collins, graham, et al) for “republican” representation – double speak be DAMNED!
A woman nominee makes “political” sense given the current state of affairs, but it also puts the liberals/democrats at a pronounced disadvantage of their own making. Trust a second term for the President will “auto correct” what ails the US.
Do IT! Bring IT! Nominate and then VOTE! – let the libs/dems run a female (OR a person of color lol) through the gauntlet – welcome it. And let the attack also TAKE OUT RINO’s all in one fell swoop!!
Pray for this treepers.
Lets also figure out how we can accommodate and help President Trump…
“Lets also figure out how we can accommodate and help President Trump…”
Not really going to need too much help. The course of events kind of took care of it by default.
1 – Carona Virus….Just took a back seat to the SCOTUS issue & will become the number 2 factor in voters’ concern.( following the Economy).
2 – Biden’s “talking points” just evaporated & he will now need to “learn” a complete new set in record time…Good luck with that…LOL
3 – The Trump “Military Insult” news cycle lasted a week & lost ALL steam…Pretty much a dead issue with voters at this point.
4 – With the debate coming up fast in the rear view mirror, Slow Joe will have to go into “overdosing” of cognitive drugs to maintain 1 1/2 hours of what I’ll call non stop drilling from Trump….This is going to be classic… Biden , I predict, will have a melt down on National TV…LOL
5 – Biden’s only “out” from the debate is to somehow become a no show…HOW?… Well maybe this upcoming week, someone on his staff tests positive for Covid – 19 & the Dems claim to have yo put Joe in quarantine. perhaps…? Watch for something really sneaky to occur next week. IMHO just too many variables here for Biden to cope with. He will not be up for it. The Dems will need to sacrifice some City to divert attention & give them a bit of breathing room.
6 – The Economy is literally booming….A very positive point for Trump.
7 – When the SCOTUS selection process gets going, we all need to keep all eyes on the RINO’s…You all know who they are. IMHO, Turtle, judging by his rather quick response to RBG’s demise, probably has this in hand & will control Romney & Collins, & perhaps have a “back room” deal brokered with Manchin…JMHO
Going to be a very interesting 45 days…Stay frosty Treepers…..
Regarding number 5: I believe that you are correct – Biden “will unfortunately contract covid” right before the debate, but will “bravely” agree to a debate via video conference. The video conference will use haze filters and camera angles to allow a body double for Biden to do the debate.
They may even have the body double wear a mask during the entire debate.
“Hard breaks” will come to the rescue whenever the body double falters.
It will be a tightly controlled video charade.
Can they do a Deep Fake video live? Hope not. That’s a scary thought.
Yes, I believe that it is possible, but I think that will be unlikely, unless they implement a video delay. In the real-time deepfakes that I have seen, there are sometimes obvious glitches and they would need to be able to edit those out. It would be a risky thing to do.
I believe that they used at least one and maybe two body doubles for hillary when she was running in 2015 and they will probably do something similar for biden.
Having some experience in video production I can tell you yes, a live deep fake is possible. Sorry to scare you. However, the technology also exists to detect deep fakes life as well. No worries. If that scenario does play out I am pretty certain there will be monitoring to detect any issues.
*live*
If Biden contract covid then Trump should graciously offer his medical experts to help, and take another covid test of course ?
From everything I have read (which is admittedly NOT much) I think the Miami born judge would be a better pick, simply because it will be VERY hard for the Senators to indulge in OBVIOUS bias against a Latina, and it will probably cement the state of Florida in November, if there was any question.
Also, my one concern with Barrett all along has been her absolute devotion to the teachings of Rome above all else…with the increasing leftward bent of each successive Pope that could present real issues in the future, IMHO!
Good point…
Agree. Imagine the enthusiasm among the Cuban community, as well as among Hispanics generally. I think PDJT really wants to come through the election with a majority of the Hispanic vote, and this might just do it. Add in the recent campaigning with the head of Goya foods and the really impressive Maximo Alvarez with his stark message about the dangers of being taken in by Communists masquerading as Catholics (Castro) and I would say the dots connect.
Got a little Sun Tzu to that pick too. Let your plans be as mysterious as . . . And all that.
Dems have spent two years figuring out the game plan for Amy Coney Barrett. For Barbara Legos, they are scrambling. Move would be classic President Trump.
Lagoa.
I think Rao didn’t make the list because Pres. really needs her on the DC Circuit. And the vote was a squeaker.
Lagoa got 80 votes. Going to be very difficult for more than 20 Dems to villainize a Latina that they voted for less than two years ago.
Harris didn’t vote for Lagoa. Harris will come in and grandstand and make Americans detest her even more. Nasty, nasty. Win win all around.
80 votes in the Senate? Are you kidding me?
Then in that case she REALLY must be nominated. The fallout and their twisting their positions would be epic. Even the RINOS!
Alex I like both Amy Coney Barrett and Lagoa.
ACB would be the person who would take on Roe v Wade, but Lagoa would be the kind of judge who would consistently rule against the socialist Left, because of her family’s experience with it first hand. She would always be a winner for upholding constitutional rights in my opinion.
One thing for sure, we’ve all learned you can never really count on conservative judges, with the exception of Judge Thomas, to rule conservatively.
So my hope is that whoever it is, that they consistently rule in favor of the constitution and freedom.
Brilliant! Makes perfect sense.
Great points mom. Not a fan of Deep State Vatican.
There’s another plus, when Trump let’s everyone know Marco Rubio is a fraud his support will evaporate just like that.
Only 2 words concerning your observation, Clarence Thomas.
Could not agree more, Vikingmom.
This allegiance to the Pope is like having double citizenship. Where is your real allegiance?
Another area of possible trouble is her membership in some kind of a cult (Forgot their name…Handmaid something) with a lot of family being members of it…
She is going to be attacked on that.
The Court has enough Catholic representation.
Mrs Lagoa is invaluable because of her experience with Communism. We need her. She is the right person at the right time.
I have lived for 30 years under French Socialism. The State taxes the people so much they are serfs who cannot do anything and barely have enough to eat and pay rent. Home ownership, starting a business. Forget it. Yellow Vests could not roll back the abuses.
Save us from Socialism/Communism!
Viking mom,
Who needs the Marxists to voice their ant Catholic bile when posters on here are doing it for them?
I am a staunch Catholic, and think our current Marxist pope is the worst appointment (by Soros and his pals) in recent history.
His global warming, anti guns, open borders, anti capital punishment and pro Muslim views are just that – his views – and ignored by any Catholic with a brain.
Furthermore any one who is not against infanticide as practised and proposed by the Democrats cannot be pro Trump.
Finally don’t be surprised if the Cuban American lady holds similar views to Barrett.
I thought the American people got over their bias when Jack Kennedy got elected – apparently not.
Pat,
Don’t take offense where it is not intended. I don’t think the intention is to smear Catholics at all. It is a legitimate issue given the stated political preferences of the current Pope. What we need to know about ANY potential SC Justice is that they would adhere to the Constitution over any other loyalties they might have. A lot of Catholics are like you. However, you yourself know there are some that aren’t and would follow Bergoglio’s teachings/admonitions because they see him as the Vicar of Christ on Earth. The American public needs to know just how a Catholic nominee would act in a situation where the Constitution and the current Pope’s beliefs/teachings were in major disagreement. It is neither biased or unfair to insist on an answer to that question.
For what it is worth, any potential LDS SC Justice could, and should be, forced to publicly state their position on that possible conflict of conscience.
Patrick – I have many friends who are “staunch” Catholics as well – some are conservative Pro-lifers but also love their church…others are strident Leftists who revere their Pope far too much, IMHO. As with ANY religious tradition, there are people who claim a title but it doesn’t actually change the way they live their life.
I meant no disrespect to your faith so please don’t read something into my words I did not say. My concern with Amy Barrett is that she has been very vocal about her Catholic faith and therefore might feel pressured to recuse herself from any vote that dealt with any kind of “religious” question, such as abortion, gay marriage, immigration, etc.
Do I think that is right? No, absolutely NOT, but do I think it could happen? Yes, I absolutely do!
The Democrats war on women begins next week.
Suburban moms take note.
It is Wonderful that PDJT is seriously considering a Talented, Qualified, Accomplished, Credentialed, Experienced, Female Candidate for the Supreme Court. There are Many. Not enough, but Many.
It would be difficult to choose only one. I trust My President to nominate Quality and Character.
A woman is a good choice for more than one reason. They are highly unlikely to want to have sex with children and become victims of blackmail by the democrats so they end up doing things like voting for a forced healthcare program or maybe even for unsolicited mail in ballots.
Plus, a woman who has had kids has a different take on the process than a man or a woman who hasn’t had kids.
Great comment, Dondeg. I was trying to word something very similar, no need.
LOLOLOL….there’s so much truth in that statement devilbat!!!!
If Lagoa gets the nod she will be labeled as a ‘white Hispanic’ by the left right away. To the left anyone labeled as white becomes their rightful target in their sick minds.
Because she’s white. Hispanic is not a race.
The totalitarian Democrats are already threatening to pack the court with fellow political hack totalitarian judges. If they win the Presidency and the senate, kiss the republic and the Bill of Rights completely goodby.
The Democrat Party as currently represented, has zero chance of winning the Presidency and a majority in the Senate. What are they offering to the voters? Who is there base? They have gotten way, way over their skis and their nuttery, this year especially. Trump landslide. Take it to the bank.
Perfectly stated starfcker.
You may be overestimating the intelligence of your fellow man.
.
No man ever went broke overestimating the ignorance of the American public.
You can fool most of the people most of the time.
Many people are gullible, and we can expect this to continue.
– P. T. Barnum
I am on a weekly automatic contribution to President Trump. If what you say is true, I should contact them and stop those contributions else I am a fool throwing away my money.
I think I’ll keep going like I am. Although Nancy would also say to stop.
Let them try, We The People will send them packing….
Doing the right thing would make History!
Meah, I thought about /s but think I’ll just let it hang!
We need a known entity nominated and not someone who is going to turn into a flaming Leftist once they are confirmed! We’ve seen that before!
I’d say that is the woman from Cuba.
She is American born, with Cuban parents.
Were her parents American citizens at her birth?
Geez, need to go to bed….stupid question, relates to presidential candidates, not the Court. Nighty-night!
There is no constitutional requirement for judges to even be citizens let alone nbc citizens. The nbc requirement is unique to only the office of POTUS in Article II and since the VPOTUS is also constitutionally required to be qualified as POTUS it should apply to them as well. Obviously the uniparty detests this requirement with the recent cases of Ozero, Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, Santorum, and now Harris and the upcoming case of Halley at least.
I’m going to say it.
This unlooked for event of RBGs passing feels like the hand of God. I couldn’t imagine how we could transcend and defeat the legal action to steal the election.
Now there is a chance.
Mysterious ways, My Friend, mysterious ways.
Yup Dondeg. And isn’t it interesting that RBG left us on the first day of Rosh Hashanah! Coincidence? Oh, wait. It’s G-D we are talking about isn’t it. Never mind!
I too see the hand of God at work so much right now even through the tumultuous times.
God be with us.
In chaos lies opportunity, and not only for the forces of darkness.
While I agree with the necessity, the possibility of a “Bush v Gore” scenario is ludicrous. Biden has no support! Like Hillary in 2016, no one shows at his appearances!!! I saw more ants on the sidewalk than people who attended anything of Biden’s. Why are we not making ballot-harvesting and mail-in voting (not absentee) ILLEGAL???? NO MAIL-IN BALLOTS PAST NOV3rd!!! WT…??!!!
I mentioned this in another thread. This is shades of Obama’s second run when he didn’t campaign and won. Vote!!!!!
Ozero’s 2012 “win” was so obviously with a massive amount of fraud and I personally doubt his 2008 “win” Dimms or prolific and proficient at cheating. Not that the GOPe does not engage in it at times but the Dimms are so much better practiced at it.
I don’t think it will be Amy, because everyone expects it to be her. Our President never shows all of his cards. He will save her for the next time.
It’s gonna be Sidney Powell. You’ll see.
She would be awesome but she is a little older…
Probably go with someone in the lower 50’s range.
I would like that just so she could trash nasty Democrats in the confirmation hearings. But I think POTUS Trump will pick one of the two pictured at the top of Sundance’s thread.
Ms Powell would get my note if I had one.
*vote…yeesh
Great thought but way too big a pay cut! Money talks!
Funny, the DIms are threatening to pack the Supreme Court, make states out of PR and DC, nuke the filibuster, plus riot and burn in retaliation for RBG’s seat being filled before the election.
I could just be clueless but…aren’t they going to do that anyway? (or already doing it)
Yep. It is a complete game of crying “wolf” at this point. My mother in law texted me last night saying “The left is already threatening riots if anyone is nominated for her seat before the election” and I immediately responded with “So? They have been doing exactly that for months. No one cares anymore. So, what, they will burn their own cities…further? Yawn.”
Like everything else they’ve flailed their arms about for the past 4 years, the left has overplayed their hand with the riots and no one is paying attention to their cries for attention anymore.
I personally think it should be Ric Grennell. He is not a woman but he sure knows how to stand up for what is right.
Grennell is not a lawyer.
Oddly, you don’t have to be a lawyer to be on the Supreme Court. 49 non-lawyers have been appointed to the Supreme Court.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_law_schools_attended_by_United_States_Supreme_Court_justices
Nominate Merrick Garland. Tough for the Dems to attack but moderates the Ginsburg seat. Probably get results similar to Kavanaugh.
To clever by a half, but interesting thought.
I would say nominating Merrick Garland would be backup plan … … number … … 125.
Hah!
When I realized RBG had passed last night, and found myself saying unkind things, I decided that from now through the end of the year I should mostly stay off the Internet. I’ll (try to) watch from afar, praying that Justice will prevail in all cases. My way of managing #2020Stress.
I’ve never wished a man dead, but I have read some obituaries with great pleasure.
– Mark Twain
Just remember RBG cared nothing and did not give you a thought in her political rulings. Rest easy.
Well, I can’t count. it’s nine women on the list. Not in any particular order?
Meg Ryan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_A._Ryan
Alison Eid
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allison_H._Eid
Kate C Todd
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kate_Comerford_Todd
Martha Pacold
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martha_M._Pacold
Bridget S Bade
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridget_Shelton_Bade
Diane Sykes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_S._Sykes
Alison J Rushing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allison_Jones_Rushing
Barbara Lagoa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Lagoa
Amy Barrett
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Coney_Barrett
I really don’t understand the posters here claiming that Coney Barret would place Church teaching above the Constitution. If she’s a good judge she will go with the Constitution. That should be evident already. Being Catholic myself and well versed in Catholic teaching, I really can’t see any Church teaching that conflicts with the Constitution. And the Pope CAN’T change Church teaching, no matter how ambiguous his comments may be. Neither can any bishop. The teaching comes from the Bible and Tradition. Look this up in the Catechism of the Catholic Church. These accusations in effect say that a good Catholic can’t be a good judge. Horse pucky.
Some folks even some here it seems have been DiFi’ed! If you get my drift!
Heard the same comments and worse about JFK when he was running. Thought we were beyond that.
Nordic
The Bible is the Word of God.
Tradition is the word of men.
When it comes to doctrine the Bible and Tradition are not in agreement.
I for one stand firmly on the Bible alone. Sola Scriptura.
Very grateful I live in this Century.
Yes, yes, yes. Both tradition and religion. With man’s introduction of these two comes works. And works will not save anyone. We cannot earn our salvation as it is a gift. And a gift is free.
The Garland seat was never meant to be filled at that point. That narrative is political theater to keep the fake Republican/Democrat paradigm going. We have a globalist uniparty or someone here said the hate American party and the sell America out party.
They never thought Hillary would lose.
Hillary was meant to win and RBG to retire. Then Hillary could appoint a historic justice in payback to Loretta Lynch.
Don’t forget it was Bill Clinton who appointed RBG. So his historic appointment would be replaced with another historic appointment by his wife, the first female POTUS.
See what a nice narrative that builds for the history books?
It’s all political theater and they think we’re all too stupid to see it for what it is.
My comment is awaiting moderation so maybe too many links.
I will do two posts if the above gets trashed.
Here goes
Well, I can’t count. it’s nine women on the list. Not in any particular order?
Meg Ryan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_A._Ryan
Alison Eid
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allison_H._Eid
Kate C Todd
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kate_Comerford_Todd
Martha Pacold
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martha_M._Pacold
Part 2
Well, I can’t count. it’s nine women on the list. Not in any particular order?
Bridget S Bade
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridget_Shelton_Bade
Diane Sykes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_S._Sykes
Alison J Rushing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allison_Jones_Rushing
Barbara Lagoa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Lagoa
Amy Barrett
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Coney_Barrett
The President will need to nominate a female judge that has already passed through the Senate confirmation process -:that will show she has been thoroughly vetted previously. I have a feeling he will either choose Lagoa from Fl or Eid ( would be the first Egyptian-American on SCOTUS) from CO – both states he needs support from.
Alison Eid is very accomplished and experienced, wrote for Reagan and clerked with SC Clarence Thomas.
However the all look very accomplished, but some have more judicial experience than others.
We will soon know.
Believe Eid’s husband is Egyptian, she is not.
Mitch better lean hard
Threaten to bust people down to buck private if they don’t get on the train
– and MEAN it
“I actually like women much more than I like men.”
POTUS laying out the bait for the Level 6 TDS sufferers to gnaw on for bit.
Are the names on the President’s first list of possible Justice picks still in the running? There was a man, one of India-American heritage that seemed in the running last time, which would certainly go against the whole Trump is a Xenaphobe narrative; and the President said that his choice may well be a woman, not a definite will be.
Whoever the choice is, am sure both the nominee and the President and White House vetting staff will be ready for whatever nasty attacks the Dem’s will come up with.
See above on the female nominees. All the men are still on the list and are also very accomplished.
See here for the links and bios of all the nominees.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_Supreme_Court_candidates
Thank you.
Judge Lagoa’s father in law is a US District Judge who was appointed by President Clinton. Just wanted to point this out.
Hmmmmm. Well, that’s not good.
Okay, so then our choice comes down to a woman who’s already threatening to recuse herself from hearing certain cases, and another woman who’s father-in-law was a Clinton appointee. Now what?
I’m not calling her integrity into question, but if she is a judge and her father in law is a judge, I don’t see a situation in which he would not have mentored her to at least some extent.
Guilt by association? Twice removed at that!
What does his record look like?
BTW, I watched the video of her being nominated in Florida;
her children, husband and parents were there and in the back were
a man and a woman who looked like “sticks in the mud” as my
grandmother used to say. Could be the father-in-law and wife.
If SCOTUS judges would just make judgements based on the Constitution, we wouldn’t have to worry so much about politics from the court. However, it is only conservatives who are strict constructionists. Liberal judges believe they can legislate from the bench.
(correction) some “conservative” Justices Souter, Roberts, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh come immediately to mind
Trump likes to get things done so,
Nominate her on Monday, vote her in on Tuesday.
Move her stuff in Tuesday night.
Swear her in Wednesday morning and she Ubers to St Ct.
all done. The world is safe again.
We get on with the election.
Don’t ya just love how they say they should wait until the election is over so the “voters” can decide…. *cough
Um…… we did vote and our guy is still president…. so we the voters have decided not some communist democrat party ballot scam.
Some place I saw the supposed quote that RBG wanted the appointment delayed until “another president was elected”! Hummmm…..did she know something or are we to wait until 2024?
BTW, glad to see your post. Been awhile.
I fail to see the point of prejudicing a Supreme Court Nominee in favor of a Gender.
snowshooze: I agree. Especially when there are so many genders from which to chose.
?! Good one billrla!
??
Me too but that horse has left the barn.
President Trump’s announcement tonight kind of takes the discussion off the table.
I have a hunch as to why he’s indicated that preference but I’ll hold that thought for later.
I assume it’s to preempt some fake rape allegations and take away some talking points about sexism, but yeah, I don’t like this either. That said, the value of not letting them steal the seat is pretty damn high, so I’m willing to give a pass on this particular one, even though I’m very much against the practice of biasing seats in general.
It’s because the leftists already have 20 women lined up to claim they were sexually assaulted by (fill in the blank). And because he was already holding one back for this. RBG or Sotomayer who has serious health issues. President Trump is a master strategist. He’s not focused on gender because of his ideology, he’s beating the dems at their own game, forcing them to live up to their own rules. It’s anti Alinski 101. And the timing is in a way great, because once the leftists try and destroy a married mother of 7 from the suburbs, the dem strategy to target that group (suburban women) will collapse on itself. Even more than it did after Kenosha.
A little nuance…. if the seat remains open on election day, it will drive the dems to turn out to vote far more than Tapioca Joe ever could. But it will also motivate conservatives, although they are already enthusiastic. Advantage leftists.
Roe x Wade is the issue right now.
50 million in donations to Democrats since RBG died.
They are scaremongering women, saying men will get rid of abortion to enslave women, they will also end women’s right to vote etc.
Dems are making women’s “rights” the issue to scare people into voting for them.
I disagree with you; you have to look at the politics of this. If President Trump chooses a man; Democrats want that so they can ride the confirmation for a possible 8 justices in case there is a dispute over the election.
You forget John Robert!
Women would also be mad if the pick is not a woman.