This is really over-the-top.    If you think anti-Semitism does not infect the highest reaches of all political offices this will essentially set you straight.   This is MUST READ stuff:
 Pam Geller and Robert Spencer are heroes of uncompromising magnitude.  They have educated millions of people on the intents and purposes of radical Islam.  While doing so they have held a spotlight on Culturally Marxist (Politically correct) infection that always accompanies such discussions.   As a consequence of their effectiveness they have been banned from travel to Great Britain.  So they began to send in records requests to find out what the official U.K state reasoning is behind their restrictions.  The “Official” records they have uncovered within Great Britain outline their visible support for the state of Israel is a reason for their being banned.   

( Pam Geller Writes )  The British government tried to cover its tracks. But a new cache  of documents Robert Spencer and I have received in our battle to overturn our  being banned from Britain reveal that a chief reason why we were banned from the  country was because we strongly support Israel.

As part of our lawsuit against  the Queen of England and the Home Secretary et al, we have received numerous  documents between the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the Office of Security  and Counterterrorism, and the Home Secretary. In one of them, an official in the  Foreign & Commonwealth Office whose name was redacted wrote this letter on  May 7 to a recipient whose name was also redacted:

I have received initial feedback from Post to say that they do  not expect that there would be any reaction from the US Administration to these  exclusions.

We do have concerns with some of the reasoning in the sub,  particularly citing pro-Israeli views and. [sic] Pro-Israeli views (and also  support for waterboarding) apply to a large number of Americans, including  former Presidents. If, for instance, Geller and Spencer were to request details  of their exclusion under FOI/DPA or other mechanism, that being pro-Israeli is  cited as a reason may be problematic and they could argue publically that their  exclusion is on the basis of their support for Israel.

I may get further advice from Post later tonight which I will  send to you first thing in the morning. Meanwhile, we advise removing references  to being pro-Israel from the main body of the sub as this is not grounds for  exclusion.

The “sub” is the “Subject Profile” – one was drawn up on each of  us. There is no way to tell how much about our being pro-Israel was removed, but  mine still says, “She strongly supports Israel and is an ardent Zionist.” And  also: “Pamela Geller’s outspoken support for Israel may also attract  pro-Palestinian groups to attend, further complicating the policing operation on  the ground and making it harder to keep opposing groups apart.”

So now we know the real reason why we were banned.  (continue reading)

After you read the article Geller wrote for the Daily Caller (link above) be sure to check out her website for more information and updates.    CLICK HERE