My-oh-My,  how twitchy the politically dependent forces are at this very minute. It really is staggering how they view the potential sunlight to be deadly toward them. Like vampires watching a sunrise while hiding amid a diminishing shadow of protection, the desperation is palpable.

Obviously the media is “all in”, as witnessed by this picture of the Orlando Courthouse taken earlier today.  The alphabets, the race-based BGI dependents, and their co-dependent enablers, are literally coordinating talking points within their trailers and tents.

One of the frequent topics of conversation is how to keep the “new media” at bay, so the Legacy Media can continue their narrative advancement unabated; They need this trial desperately, and the finances driven from within it.

Today I had a conversation with a super-intelligent Wolverine debating whether or not to attend the first day post-trial press conference and ask the “questions” you guys want answers to. (more on that in later days)

The 5th District Court of Appeals is definitely engaged in following this case. We heard the “per curium” ruling (per curium simply means “through or by the court”) in general does not entail any type of extensive written explanation, and are usually not signed as to who rendered the decision.

Why? According to the 5th these type of decisions are considered so “obvious” in nature the justices feel the issue should never have reached them in the first place.  I was reminded: “the decision was unanimous and was issued as ‘per curium’“.

So what does this mean? To a non-attached party it does not say much, so questions need to be asked. Is there something we are missing? How should the tea leaves be read here?

A “capable” or “fairly intelligent” judge should see this as a shot across his/her bow. In addition, this is also a signal to the Chief Judge the higher courts aren’t horribly impressed.

Remember, the decision to overrule Judge Nelson did not happen in a void, a vacuum, or in the abstract. One legislative day earlier a preview of sorts was dispatched in a far more stunning reversal. That reversal actually ordered an entire new trial. Such a trial is a big cost for the 18th district to bear, again.

Budgets are challenged and slim to begin with, these continual, and frequently necessary, decisions to “step-in and correct” do not sit well with judicial superiors and holders of the purse strings for these offices. In short the DCA signal to Nelson is also aimed at The Chief Justice, and in no uncertain terms is saying “you are being watched closely”.

A judge who does not “get the message” can/will often find themselves mired in Probate or Juvie et al. Internally the construct is not to unseat a sitting judge, that is to be avoided. However, there are plenty who have labored for years, if not the remainder of their career, in the less than desirable areas of law.

Likewise the other judges within the circuit have also borne witness. When you see a peer under such scrutiny, and perhaps operating as if it doesn’t matter, the circumstances do indeed affect their professional opinion and respect levels. This is not stated to be harsh toward Nelson, it just is what it is.

So one might question “if that’s the case, does she know”? Or “is she just clueless”? Well, Judge Nelson has been a judge for plenty of time to “both know and also understand this”. Her rulings and decisions from this point forward “should absolutely be grounded within the framework of the law, period, the end, no questions”.

Yes, it goes without saying they should always be – but they have not, and these reversals -and overruling’s- are the messages to her in that regard.

A continued deviation and a “damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead” mentality may not lead to the type of career a long serving jurist would enjoy. This is denominated by, of course, the concept of “capable” and “fairly intelligent” which “should” be present, but are now being reviewed to establish if they ever were….

Legal professionals who walk the mahogany halls, and who stride the marbled steps daily, are absolutely baffled at her decisions. They have actually conversed on any form of legal framework she might be using to base her decisions. They cannot.

We’re not only talking about the clerks and DCA advisors here. We are also talking about people who have been in these halls for over forty years. They have seen good judges, very good judges. They have reviewed good ones, average ones, and poor ones who certainly had good intentions when they ran for office, but were over their heads. The common quote is: “A good attorney does not always make a good judge”.

*If it’s in quotes, this was an actual word or phrased used

In Sanford the new Police Chief has suspended all vacations, furloughs and paid time off until the trial is over. Other law enforcement agencies from around the region have been called in for support and assistance. Unknown to many outside of law enforcement for many months inter-agency conversations and actual training has been taking place for months. The DOJ is using the CRS to feel out the black community for anticipation of their rage – and the preferred locations for their violence should it erupt. Emergency plans have been drawn – and state resources (National Guard) are staged.

In Miami-Dade the twitch is divergent. Down there it’s all about self interest and cover-up. I mean Cover-Up with a capital “C”. I cannot yet go into full detail – but suffice to say the more they circle the wagons, the smaller the circle of protection gets.

We are directly over the target – they are bunkered down not expecting that we would have paid for “bunker busters”.   [We did- thanks in part to you]   Now those bunker busters are hanging like the Sword of Damocles over their head (and they can see them). Recently.

Here is a snippet of a response from the center of the nest:

[…]  As indicated in our response to you, staff Of the School Board Attorney’s Office has advised our office that audio files relative to your request must be transcribed in order to ensure proper redaction. Upon receipt of a cost estimate from staff, a follow-up response from my office will follow.

Our office has so far provided to you all records that have been submitted to us by M-DSPD and the School Board Attorney. By way of copy on this email, I am asking those to offices to respond to me as to status of your request as outlined by you below. […]

We might not be legion….

….. but we are WOLVERINES !