Sidney Powell Discusses Peter Strzok CYA Notes – “There’s A Criminal Conspiracy in There”…

Michael Flynn’s attorney Sidney Powell appears with Maria Bartiromo to provide insight into the DC Circuit Appellate court ordering the dismissal of the Flynn case. One of the key points Ms. Powell draws attention to is that her client was targeted.  Within that targeting there’s a criminal conspiracy.

In hindsight it is very clear the White House, DOJ and FBI knew they were treading on thin ice. Susan Rice’s memo to file is clearly a CYA memo for the White House. James Comey’s memos are clearly a CYA effort for his participation. Bill Priestap kept his own notes reflecting his CYA; and Peter Strzok’s notes appear to have the same motivation.

Additionally, when the special counsel was put into place, Andrew McCabe’s memos to self are clearly written from a CYA perspective. They knew what they were doing was wrong.

Think about everyone in this picture above (left to right):

      • FBI Agent Peter Strzok kept CYA notes.
      • FBI Director James Comey kept CYA memos.
      • NSA Susan Rice wrote CYA memo on behalf of President Obama.
      • Depute Director Andrew McCabe wrote CYA memos.
      • FBI Counterintelligence Head Bill Priestap kept CYA notes.

Sidney Powell is correct, “there’s a criminal conspiracy in there.”

This entry was posted in 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, AG Bill Barr, Cold Anger, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, FBI, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, media bias, President Trump, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized, White House Coverup and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

312 Responses to Sidney Powell Discusses Peter Strzok CYA Notes – “There’s A Criminal Conspiracy in There”…

  1. Bogeyfree says:

    So has anyone been direct with Gen. Flynn and asked him directly…..

    Are you under any type of gag order?

    If no, can you tell us what you know about……

    1) Libya and any guns/weapons our state department might have given to rebel terrorists?

    2) What really happened at Benghazi and who was at fault?

    3) NSA Contractor Program from 2012-2014 where they spied and gathered information on thousands of Americans illegally?

    4) kickbacks and/or money laundering schemes via the Iran deal or foreign countries and NGO’s?

    The people who talk with General Flynn need to focus on these 4 potential issues as that could be where the meat on the bone is.

    Since Sidney posts here at CTH, any way to ask her if Gen Flynn will do a call in interview with Sundance?

    I hope someone who uses twitter might just post these 4 questions to her on her twitter page and see if she might respond.

    Liked by 9 people

    • cboldt says:

      As far as I know, the trial venue has not imposed any gag order. There is a protection order for DISCOVERY in the trial, but that’s it.
      The subjects you noted are covered by independent regulations dealing with classified information. Meaning even though there is no gag order in the trial, Flynn can’t just start blabbing classified information.

      Liked by 8 people

    • Heika says:

      You know it shows his incredible discipline if he is not. He is truly a remarkable man

      Liked by 12 people

      • “It ain’t Over, until the Fat Lady Sings”(John Roberts) … The Case is NOT Dismissed WITH Prejudice YET.!!!… The Coup D’SWAMP goes On… Let’s see how the DC Full Panel SPRINGS into Action: (7) Current members: Dem Appointments (2) Bushes (3) Trump … You do the Math.!!!

        Liked by 3 people

    • HecklerDon says:

      General Flynn doesn’t need to same a d am thing about any of that stuff until dismissal of his case is finalized. Be smart. He and Ms. Powell have come too far to go and shoot their own foot off this late in the game.

      Plus the man has been financially broken because of this. He needs to get that information into a book and get it to print PRONTO once his case is finalized.

      Liked by 2 people

    • MelH says:

      Twitter doesn’t work that way; No one has a “Twitter page”. Participants post what they want to say and have NO say over who sees what they say. Jack Dorsey governs who sees what, and that changes from moment to moment. Chances are, these days, posters here would not be successful on Twitter.


    • bullybeef says:

      Flynn is still under a gag order in the sense that he hasn’t been fully cleared because that POS “judge” is still playing games


  2. Juju Brown says:

    At what point does it become treason?

    Liked by 1 person

    • trevieze says:

      We would all like to know that one. There needs to be a brick wall in Utah with holes in it.

      Liked by 2 people

    • trevieze says:

      We would all like to know that one. There needs to be a brick wall in Utah with holes in it.


    • bertdilbert says:

      They need to get rid of Wrey and Bill Barr needs to step up to the plate. If Sidney has this much information, Barr and Durham have to have more. It is time to stop pretending.

      Liked by 2 people

      • HecklerDon says:

        Bill Barr has been stepping up to the plate from Day 1. Bill Barr was born stepped up to the plate. Many of you folks must not play much chess…

        If you think things are bad now, this thing would be lost already without Bill Barr coming out of retirement to try and save this heaping pile of burning garbage.

        Liked by 4 people

    • WhiteBoard says:

      he was the president – he as absolute choice – thats the complication in all this…

      maybe someone else can provide better details – any help?

      my guess is the russian issue was strategic to hurt russia financially with funding Syria- so the sleeper cells in the gov could push Syria to a Muslim Brotherhood ownership and role into Turkey – setting the domino for Europe being dominated.

      so when PDJT didnt Attack Russia – it let Russia still have the capability to dominate Syria and hold that line.

      I would of mapped out all muslim brotherhood footprints in our country and agencies by now (like im sure PDJT has already) … and purge them following the election (hence the great outline sundance has already shown on the middle east visits/handshakes)

      Liked by 3 people

    • RAC says:

      Not a lawyer but would think their actions officially became treason on 20th Jan 2017 and have continued through till present day.

      Liked by 5 people

    • way2opinionated says:

      The answer is never.

      “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”

      Who’s the enemy?

      18 U.S. Code § 372 – Conspiracy to impede or injure officer: “If two or more persons in any State, Territory, Possession, or District conspire to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States…”

      Don’t think there will be a lack of crimes to charge them with.

      Liked by 2 people

    • GB Bari says:

      Since the use of force was never used nor discussed, at least as far as we know at this point, it likely doesn’t become “treason.”

      Sidney stated her opinion of the crime at the end of the video: “…a criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice.”

      Liked by 2 people

      • Muthaucker says:

        Falsely prosecuting someone is the very definition of “intimidation”.

        Liked by 1 person

        • steph_gray says:

          Agree! That’s a threat to use the force of the government.

          What happened to Roger Stone was use of force with no legal basis to do so. Of course I am not a lawyer. But when the Constitution was written, this sort of thing was common sense…

          Liked by 1 person

    • Mauricio says:

      As of November 2016.


  3. justlizzyp says:

    Does the “Biden brought up Logan Act” angle change the applicability of the 60 day rule?

    Liked by 2 people

  4. justlizzyp says:

    I know it isn’t a ‘Rule’ but I’m curious how that nugget changes the math


  5. Eaglet says:

    Correct me if I am wrong but Gleeson submitted a extension to decide (lack of word) doesn’t the appeals court have to agree?


    • Raised on Reagan says:

      The Court of Appeals in its ruling on Flynn’s Writ of Mandamus stated: “… and the District Court’s order appointing an amicus is hereby vacated and moot,…”

      Gleeson has been told to go home.

      Liked by 5 people

    • GB Bari says:

      Gleeson is trying to get an unauthorized shot at the goal in “sudden death” overtime.
      But the Court of Appeals already tossed a flag on his participation: ineligible.

      Sullivan and Lawfare might be illegally lining up the assurances of a majority of the full bench of the Appellate Court so Sullivan can demand an en banc hearing, knowing the outcome beforehand.

      (Oh yes, I fully believe that if they thought they could get away with it, all leftwing biased judges would willingly violate any and all sorts of ethics laws in order to to gain a victory over Flynn and thus by proxy, over Trump).

      Liked by 6 people

  6. Bogeyfree says:

    When they tear down the statue of Lincoln maybe we should put up the statue of the Man who could have saved the Republic but chose not to.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. Maquis says:

    There’s nowhere in the Zero Administration where there was NOT a conspiracy.

    Liked by 12 people

  8. Charlie says:

    During the Senate and House investigations, I was hoping someone would have said to Comey “You did X, is that standard operating procedure at the FBI? You did Y, is that standard operating procedure at the FBI? Yes or no?” I think it would have exposed the big lie that everything was “by the book” but, as usual, the GOP let him blabber on, avoiding every question.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. Heika says:

    Not sure if many of you saw this yesterday, but it blew my mind. If Obama is not behind not only the Flynn thing but what is going on right now I will eat my hat. This 6 minute clip of Obama and Biden doing a ‘meet up’ was shocking to me. Obama, the snake that was launched from hell upon the earth that will not stop. I truly believe he is very hard at work right now and is behind much of what is going on to date. Including the BLM thing. Off topic? Nup. All roads lead back to him, and when you see what he says here about ‘the current social unrest’, well… your head may spin. Mine did. Only a snake could reply as such. I want to swear so will depart now. Sundance – this is worth a watch! He is pulling all the strings. Watch him watch Biden. Puppet master, the true Marxist.

    Liked by 5 people

  10. David R. Graham says:

    Criminal conspiracy indeed. Flynn was/is? the door to revealing it. “It” is American elected, appointed, and hired decision-makers embedding the Moslem Brotherhood, their cloud of Salafi fronts, fellow travelers, and ally the IRGC inside DOJ, DOD, DHS, DOS, Treasury, and the White House. In other words, stewards of American liberty and sovereignty handing those their countrymen’s treasures to spoliation by their enemies, no doubt upon earnest of this consideration and that.

    This infidelity began some decades ago and went into overdrive, Bushies on the accelerator, after the attack of 11 September 2001. As is known, it went warp-speed from 2009. Where there are Moslems, moral tone dissipates and disappears. Institutions are not maintained. Responsibilities are not valued. Law ceases to exist. A man’s word is meaningless.

    “It takes tremendous courage to resist the lure of appearances. The power of being which is manifest in such courage is so great that the gods tremble in fear of it.” Paul Tillich, “The Courage to Be.” Where POTUS Trump and LTG (R) Flynn walk, the innocent rejoice and the guilty tremble.

    Liked by 7 people

  11. David R. Graham says:

    Never doubt for an instant, Countrymen, the efficacy of your patriotism.

    The world is real. Taking it as the world is a real delusion.


  12. lfhbrave says:

    Remember how brazen Strzok was when he testified before Congress? Now it all makes sense: He kept the notes directly implicating Obama and Biden. He expected he would be protected with his notes. The fact that these notes are declassified and disclosed now may hint that Strzok’s expectation will not be met and therefore everything goes. They are going down together.


  13. Joe E says:

    New here. If FBI refuses to release original 302, was the 302 not used with the court. Does the court have it? Can’t they release it?

    Liked by 4 people

    • Ad rem says:

      Welcome to the Treehouse Joe! 😀

      Liked by 6 people

    • MaineCoon says:

      The original 302 has not been produced to anyone, including the Court.

      Liked by 4 people

      • regitiger says:

        that “we” know of.

        for example and by extension: as we have learned only recently the strikeout hand notes….prior to this week, completely unknown.

        give it time is what I am saying….but also be prepared to be skeptical…

        drip drip and selective declass unredaction processes are ripe for disinformation ….

        it’s a game of “served records”..and omission.

        Grenell showed the way forward…but lets me clear…not every single record of this conspiracy is going to be released by DNI..or any other department. WHY? I have a pretty good reason to believe that many very critically important elements of facts, records and phone calls, and emails followed the Clinton protocol…off book, off record and all black holed. (starting to understand why comey might not have desired to go after hilary now?)

        What IS officially recorded and available is probably sufficient for initiating criminal indictments…..I think this at least half a dozen cases right now, could proceed based soley in what we have in open source. I have no doubts there is much much more held back awaiting more investigative energy…and certainly AG Barr needs to recognize the absolute power he wields to get after it.

        just my opinion.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Issy says:

      Joe E: No, I don’t think it was ever produced by the prosecution as part of the Brady material that was ordered by Sullivan.


  14. Nigella says:

    Sullivan is not gonna to do what the Courts told him… He is trying to request more time… Terrible

    Liked by 2 people

    • HecklerDon says:

      Of course he’s not. Don’t forget. This is a man who raised [at least] one of his sons to be a belligerent weed smoking, weed shirt wearing, weed shirt selling, racist shirt wearing, racist shirt selling heap of human dung. Apple don’t fall far from the tree. How humiliating it must be for Honorable Judge Sullivan to have totally failed as a parent and to have his son dragging his family name through the sludge pit every single day of his life. Just think of how terrible it must be for him to squeeze out a fake smile for photos with his sorry a$ $ son. I mean, he has to pretend or he’ll only further alienate the petulant spoiled rotten racist drug addict. Too late, Judge. You failed at your most important task in life. You get an “F.”

      And make no mistake. I have no personal knowledge. This is my observation from the photos the son puts all over the internet. Humiliating.

      Liked by 1 person

  15. atpooka says:

    It’s stunning what an impact the conspiracy to target Flynn had on the all of the subsequent swamp attacks. If only Sidney could have been engaged sooner justice would be that much closer. Better late than never.

    Liked by 1 person

    • jay says:

      So true what Sidney said. Obama and his evil minions changed the course of history. Wicked man that Obama. Simply wicked. My mind warps when I imagine him as President.

      Liked by 2 people

  16. inspectorudy says:

    Why isn’t Joe Biden’s picture up there with the other traitors?


  17. Dan Dan says:

    ICYMI – FYI — Conspiracy Against Rights — Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law

    Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 – Conspiracy Against Rights

    This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same)…

    Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 – Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law

    This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S…

    Acts under “color of any law” include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under “color of any law,” the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes ordinances, or customs…

    Liked by 4 people

  18. Scattergood Baines says:

    I see Obama with a Sidney Powell voodoo doll sticking pins every time she’s on TV. Pray for Trump’s election. That’s when the watershed happens.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Hammersdad says:

    That there was and is a criminal conspiracy involved – not only right to the top but likewise to some grey eminences who do not exactly appear on any government org charts – there is effectively zero doubt. However, (short of unlawful coercion – or a blinding ‘Come to Jesus’ moment on the part of involved players who have forgotten or never believed) nothing will ever bring any of them to present testimony to that effect. It will all have been ‘by the book’. That won’t even have been all that hard to show in court – since they will have also so written it.

    It is with no joy or satisfaction that I say this The only satisfactory remedy is a cure more shameful, more destructive of our Liberty, and with worse still to come than seeing them walk away unmolested. Somehow, we will also wind up paying their ‘legal expenses’. They will laugh and point at us, slap one another on the back, trade elaborate high-fives and fist bumps, and walk away chortling among themselves and their lawyers.

    Alas, alas. For some of them, enough among us voted to put them into office again and again and again and again. For the rest we tolerated their impressive records of administrative malfeasance, misfeasance, nonfeasance, and malicious wrongdoing while electing, electing, electing, electing, and re-electing their representative lawmaking, appointing, and ‘policy-making’ figureheads.

    At best We the People will only have to reap what we have sown, and refrain for a while from seeding our fields with tares and briars. At worst perhaps it will not matter with the Last Days already upon us.



  20. John OB says:

    Sidney Powell profoundly stated. “They changed the history of the country.” Indeed, and that conspiracy to change the country has moved to the street. Two days ago, Obama was on split screen with Biden. He chortled about what was going on in the cities: “What makes me optimistic is the fact that there is a great awakening going on around the country, particularly among younger people.” Obama calls rioting, looting, arson, killing and erasing history–a great awakening!

    The conspiracy from the top has attenuated while the conspiracy from the bottom has metastasized. Both are actually driven from the same source. The aging community organizer would know this. His political beginnings were instructed from the same place BLM co-founder Patrisse Cullors received her training. We have seen it before with the Occupy movement as we are witness to it’s new iteration.

    BLM/ AntiFa are militant arms of the Socialist/Globalist left Democrat Party. And those angry little Marxists from the Covid-locked campus, who would be rallying with Bernie, are enjoined with their mob comrades. The Democrat Party supports this militant anarchy as a vehicle to escape the prosecutions, which might be coming their way in a continued Trump Administration. The destruction in the inner cities serves as the bridge to unseating, the disrupter, Donald J Trump in 2020.

    Liked by 4 people

  21. truthbomb says:

    1. Obama targets Flynn, Biden provides the pretext (Logan Act)
    2. Comey gleefully ambushes Flynn in the first days of the new administration
    3. Strzok and Pientka don’t make it clear Flynn is a target
    4. Strzok and Pientka apparently say Flynn didn’t lie
    5. Lisa Page and one of her stable of lovers incl “First we F*ck Flynn” McCabe doctor Flynn’s 302
    6. Weissmann, a pathetic thug pretending to be a lawyer, uses the 302 to threaten Flynn and his family in a continuation of the failed coup d’etat led by Mueller. Flynn – a patriot – refuses to roll over on POTUS
    7. Flynn’s own attorneys – DC big wigs – betray Flynn
    8. Brandon Van Grack, apparently Weissmann’s apprentice , never discloses exculpatory evidence and deceives the court about targeting Flynn’s son
    8. Flynn pleads guilty before corrupt judge Contreras who has personal relationship with Strzok
    9. Sullivan takes over the case and , in a 180 degree reversal from his oversight of the Ted Stevens case, becomes a formidable Flynn adversary and calls Flynn a traitor in open court.

    Yeah, it’s a conspiracy.

    Liked by 7 people

  22. Jim Comey is a Weasel_Doug says:

    Wait, how could these notes be from the 4th when the meeting took place on the 5th?
    What am I missing??


  23. MicD says:

    I guess I would say this interview finally gives me relief.
    But it also gives me more grief for our country.
    Some of us knew bad things were going on under Obama.
    Some of us were tuned out.
    It’s going to get worse IMO.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. swampfox999 says:

    How does this information about the obama regime’s attempted coup against a duly elected POTUS and why it should scare every single real American, get to the voters, especially in battleground states? The corporate owned globalist media has ignored all this and will continue to do so. It will also cover for the Democrat party’s mail-in ballot fraud scheme to get their stooges in office. So, what is the game plan to prevent the destruction of America? There are a bunch of squishy and/or uninformed voters out there who either get all their info from dep operative media channels or who are afraid and think voting for the dems will make the craziness stop. Perhaps not consciously, but manyuld prefer to live on their knees. How do you convince these timid souls to stand up for America and themselves, their children and thei r grandchildren.


  25. regitiger says:

    In the “spirit” of BOGEYFREE, I have roughly formed A LIST…of conspirators/co-conspirators.

    I would invite anyone here to add to the list …I will call it the OBAMAGATE CRIMINALS. (OC)

    The Coup manufactured against this president and his associates AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE is the most egregious abuse of power and the most prodigious criminal act in American history.

    The following list of persons are likely conspirators directly involved in this coup or aided and enabled it by intentionally ignoring red flags and are thus named co-conspirators:
    (there is no order priority in this list)


    Bill Taylor
    Eric Ciaramella
    Andrew Weissmann
    Christopher Wray
    Bruce Ohr
    Nellie Ohr
    Sir Richard Dearlove
    Joseph Mifsud
    Alexander Downer
    Stefan “The Walrus” Halper
    Azra Turk
    Gina Haspel
    Sessions (patsy?)
    James E. Boasberg
    SCJ Roberts

    Liked by 5 people

  26. Bogeyfree says:

    Why has no one asked AG Barr this simple question……

    Did your DOJ Attorneys keep from Sidney Powell and Gen Flynn exculpatory evidence?

    Yes or No

    If yes, then the following up is, isn’t that a crime and if so why have they not been indicted?

    Liked by 1 person

    • OpenMind says:

      The first question is a great one. The second one ought to be, “then when was that person fired, and when did you report them to the Bar and to the Court.”

      Failure to disclose Brady (exculpatory) material is not necessarily a crime on its own. It might be evidence of obstruction or part of a bigger conspiracy, but on its own, it results only in suppression of evidence. Here, the dismissal probably accomplishes that.

      However, Judge Sullivan required certifications as to the Brady materials in this case. As long as he’s looking to have someone prosecuted for perjury, he might look to lies told by the prosecutors in their certifications before Judge Sullivan in this case. Likewise, any State Bar where those attorneys are licensed should be interested in any referral from Barr.

      Liked by 2 people

  27. atomichillbilly says:

    This needs to be a big fat RICO case of gallactic proportions.

    The “permanent political class” of dc swamprats should come under the microscope and a massive purge initiated.

    America can’t afford to have unelected tyrants calling the shots.

    Liked by 4 people

  28. atomichillbilly says:

    This needs to be a big fat RICO case of gallactic proportions.

    The “permanent political class” of dc swamprats should come under the microscope and a massive purge initiated.

    America can’t afford to have unelected tyrants calling the shots.


  29. islandpalmtrees says:

    Will Judge Sullivan dismiss the case against with without prejudice or will Sullivan appeal?

    *The rights and privileges in question have to do with whether the plaintiff will be able to bring the same case to court or file another suit that is based on the same grounds as the one that has been dismissed.

    Dismissed With Prejudice

    Oftentimes the word “prejudice” is associated with unfair bias or discrimination, which may lead to the assumption that when a case is dismissed “with prejudice” it is due to some form of discrimination. That is not the case. In the legal context of a dismissal, “prejudice” refers to a loss of certain rights or privileges. For a case to be dismissed “with prejudice” means that it is dismissed with the loss of certain rights or privileges and for a case to be dismissed “without prejudice” means the opposite. The rights and privileges in question have to do with whether the plaintiff will be able to bring the same case to court or file another suit that is based on the same grounds as the one that has been dismissed.


  30. OpenMind says:

    Posted this in the presidential thread, but there were articles all over the internet in December of 2016 about the need to EXPAND the Logan Act to prohibit incoming administrations from establishing foreign policy communications channels. Those article and this legislation:
    were ridiculous, but they are clear evidence that everyone in Congress and DC generally knew that there was no Logan Act violation with Flynn. They all knew at the time.

    Liked by 3 people

    • GB Bari says:

      You discovered the “narrative” that was quickly disseminated throughout the MSM at that time as they were “ordered” to do so by the Ozero Deep State. The coup group needed the public to be infused with the Logan Act in their recent memory cells, so that when Ozero & Co (FBI). accused Flynn and others it would be readily sucked up by the ignorant and unwashed masses.

      Liked by 1 person

  31. The American Patriot says:

    As the end result of this continual unraveling, Furher O has ramped up the removal of more monuments by means of his army.


  32. Like

  33. Spooky says:

    Ms. Powell alluded to the original FD 302 of General Flynn’s interview and reminded us that it has still not been produced. Given that fact and everything else we know about what the Fibbies did under Chris Wray’s “leadership”, HOW IN THE HELL CAN HE STILL HAVE HIS JOB? The fact that he does says something very troubling about Bill Barr.

    Liked by 2 people

  34. albertus magnus says:

    Here is my question.

    After all of these years and months, we get the notes that indicate that Obama and Biden were in on it. Whoo-hoo, smoking gun.


    Since AG Barr has indicated that Durham may have some results at the end of summer and since that is within the 60 days before the election, doesnt it mean that since BIDEN is a candidate that EVERYONE including the GOP is going to be refraining, IT HAS TO WAIT UNTIL AFTER THE ELECTION since Biden is the nominee. They dont NEED Susan Rice for VP now.

    The release of these notes are the saving move of DeepState to punt this until after the election, when it is going to be quickly forgotten unless PDJT wins re-election.

    Just saying.

    Liked by 2 people

  35. Sunshine says:

    Now that what we knew (through CTH – Sundance) is confirmed, what happens to the traitorous evildoers?
    I think we all waiting for that one.


  36. kleen says:

    Liked by 1 person

  37. rayvandune says:

    Yep, there’s a criminal conspiracy there, and the Democrat candidate for President is right in the middle of it, with 130 days to go until Election Day. Do the Dems have a plan? Sure. Kamikazes had a plan too.

    Ps. Does Joe know? Are they letting him look at anything he wants to, or just NYT and NPR, etc. where they can be sure his question “Logan Act?” will never be mentioned?


  38. rayvandune says:

    Yep, there’s a criminal conspiracy there, and the Democrat candidate for President is right in the middle of it, with 130 days to go until Election Day. Do the Dems have a plan? Sure. Kamikazes had a plan too.

    Ps. Does Joe know? Are they letting him look at anything he wants to, or just NYT and NPR, etc. where they can be sure his question “Logan Act?” will never be mentioned?


  39. Sherri Young says:

    More Logan Act

    Liked by 2 people

  40. Sherri Young says:

    Peter Strzok and The Lincoln Project. Of course.

    Liked by 1 person

    • HB says:

      The Lincoln Laboratories is overseen by the Joint Advisory Committee (JAC). The JAC is part of the DOD.

      I believe the top 2 lines in Strozk’ s notes start with JAC.


    • warrprin1 says:

      The Lincoln Project is running a new Biden ad on either FAUX or FBN, maybe both. Saw it this evening for the first time. Uses clips of Presidents Clinton, W, and Ozero talking about unity, and features our PDJT as the divider. Then it moves to extolling the “unifying” virtues of Creepy Joe. Disgusting manipulative, erroneous, propagandizing of the viewer public in middle of the chaos that they, themselves, planned, launched, financed, and perpetuate, by any means necessary.

      Liked by 2 people

  41. Nom de Blog says:

    The only way this makes sense is because the Obama Administration was stealing money. I know we want to worry about foreign policy as a potential reason, but that only makes sense if the personal gain is enough. No way this is only about policy outcomes.

    Flynn was going to audit the intelligence agencies and find billions missing.

    And the conspirators had to take enormous risks because the downside is equally large.

    Was Obama and company a bunch of ideologues? Probably, sure. But more than that I believe they were enamored of the trappings of power. They wanted the money. And Flynn was a fly in that particular ointment.


    • Beau Geste says:

      and billion$ from illicit CIA and other agency off-the-books ‘business operations’ like drug running, transport, and arms sales.
      plus kickbacks fron the iran deal and foreign aid.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Retired IG says:

      Nom de Blog,
      That “Flynn was going to audit the intelligence agencies is EXACTLY what I was thinking when Sidney Powell mentioned this.
      No ONE audits the Black Budget Agencies. But Professor Mark Skidmore found trillions missing. Just like Yates – banning IG Horowitz from auditing her alphabet soup department (which I forget the name of anymore).
      IMAGINE if Flynn had kept his position and had actually accomplished an audit of all of these BLACKED OUT BUDGETS?
      Obama stealing money? LMAO on that one but not at you. President Eisenhower warned against the military industrial complex. and I believe JFK was assassinated, in addition to other reasons, because he wanted to expose it too.
      The Agencies Flynn wanted to audit have BLACK BUDGETS. You can’t see anything but the bottom line. His findings from these audits would most likely have been classified, but so what?
      I would have had great confidence that someone with integrity had audited them. THE BLACK HOLE No accounting for all of what the U.S. Taxpayer pays for. NONE.
      Yes indeed. TRILLIONS ARE AT STAKE..
      And if anyone has a problem with my terminology re BLACK HOLE, spare me. Black has been a term used by auditors and astronomers as far back as I can ken. Did you know that the word “black hole” is actually in my dictionary? Next thing to expect are the Invisible Enemies to burn dictionaries, go after auditors and astronomers for using the word BLACK when it isn’t attached to BLM. Maybe tell the Blackfoot Tribe of Native American Indians they have to erase their cultural identity? At the rate things are going, I won’t be surprised.

      Liked by 1 person

  42. spinoneone says:

    According to another commenter at American Greatness, Sullivan has issued a stay order on the Flynn case rather than comply with the Appeal Court’s decision.


    • HecklerDon says:

      It’s not “rather” than comply, I would submit. He has indeed entered a stay, which cancelled the hearing he set for this garbage to be presented to him with the amicus and all, but doing this actually would signal compliance on some level.

      These federal judges, though, boy, they think they are right there at the top of the food chain. Basically it goes like this: God is at the top, just a smidgen above surgeons…and then after surgeons, just a tad lower on the totem pole, are federal judges. They do NOT like being told what to do. I would venture to say that MANY federal district judges in his position would take their sweet time in complying with such a scathing order on mandamus. Probably getting expert legal advice on whether he actually has any options..gettin marchin orders from lawfare on timing, etc. I suspect he will delay to show his passive aggressiveness and disdain for what has occurred. Also, their will be an opportunity for someone (although I’m not sure who that would be at this point) to ask for rehearing en banc…or I believe any single member of the appeals court can move for en banc hearing…so then, if he immediately complied, it might undercut the opportunity for folks to figure out their options, if any. It might actually be that he SHOULD wait until the time for requesting en banc rehearing has expired, although I’m not sure on that.

      Whatever the case, any and every one of us should have anticipated that he would delay, at the very least. Even without the political implications, I would expect a district court judge to react this way any time he has been emasculated on mandamus by an appellate court…

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s