Sunday Talks: Senator Lankford Crushes George Stephanopoulos….

Senator James Lankford appears on ABC This Week with George Stephanopoulos to discuss his perspective around the ongoing senate trial of President Trump.

During the interview DNC operative Stephanopoulos attempts to retain an opposition false narrative and Senator Lankford just fillets the arguments with facts.  Stephanopoulos is visibly upset with his inability to upend Lankford.


*Posting late today because I’ve been deep in the weeds, assembling years of data, and solving a nagging question about Chris Steele’s primary sub-source [SEE HERE]. I’m now comfortable in predicting who that PSS is.  I will outline more on that soon.

This entry was posted in Big Stupid Government, Donald Trump, Election 2020, Impeachment, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

176 Responses to Sunday Talks: Senator Lankford Crushes George Stephanopoulos….

  1. Thank you Senator Lankford for supporting PDJT.

    Liked by 9 people

  2. Harvey Lipschitz says:


    Comes up short


    Liked by 8 people

  3. mtk says:

    What the heck Sundance…
    You link to
    Which features a photo that depicts a photo at the heart of the qanon conspiracy…

    What wtf gives. Just when rule of law and available facts are converging over the witch hunt. The link posted features a photo to a russian hottie that has been dead panned as at the heart of the qanon ‘boom drop’. A conspiracy you personally us asked to step away from.

    4D chess and trust the plan of qanon debunkiness, not with standing, I am confused.
    Confused, in that are we now to calculate there is more than meets the eye.
    I am all for there is more than meets the eye in this saga, but wtf…


    • trialbytruth says:

      Easy cowboy Sundance has talked about the hottie before but this is the oligargh that is the only reason she is interesting.

      Liked by 4 people

      • mtk says:

        Uhm.. exactly my point. Russian hotties are a dime a of dozen. The oligarchs behind them… are the central interest at the heart of the qanon conspiracy.
        The issue being built on what these so called hotties over heard while power men moved the world.
        I am under no allusion that some play thing, a toy de jure was not present while a powerful man stroke his genius.

        Additionally, the quick responce in a world of quick responses to an off the cuff observation is confirming in some respects.
        Who would have though i touch a such a nerve.


    • mtk says:

      Entering into that world of intrigue is murky, a world nearly impossible to substantiate. We can’t can’t even get our DoJ to come clean on many visiable factors.

      Trying to do so runs the risk of undermining the obvious ‘witch hunt’ measures that are increasing becoming more appearnt even if they converge below the surface onto qanon type theories of lizard people and trafficking.(/positive type scaracism)


    • Dutchman says:

      mtk; At the end of the,article above, SD says he has identufied,Steeles source.

      And then he links to a picture of Derpaska, oleg himself.

      Since your into following complicated patterns,….see if you can sus this one out.
      Hmmmmm, now WHO could be Chris Steeles “Russian Source” for the dossier?

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Merkin Muffley says:

    Every time I hear George Stephanopoulos, I feel the need to take a shower.

    Liked by 11 people

  5. X XYZ says:

    I only watch one ‘network news’ TV show per week, and it is the Sunday POS show of Steponallofus.

    Lankford did a good job today. I saw the broadcast. At around 6:35 in this tape he politely told George not to put words in his mouth. That needs to be said by EVERY Republican who appears on these programs. Not “oh, thank you so much for letting me be on your show”. Those words usually tell us who the RINOs are.

    It’s long past due that all Rebublicans stand up to little Georgy and his ilk and put him / them in their places. If George tries to interrupt the sole R guest, as he often does, the guest should warn him that they won’t tolerate it. If George does it again (as he often does), the guest should take his mike off, throw it on the floor and say ‘I’m outta here’. Not say “oh, thank you so much for having me on your program”. (Um, now can I collect my fee for appearing here on your show?)

    Parliament of whores…


  6. rjones99 says:

    Sen Lankford was impressive in that interview. I wish we could see more Rep senators vigorously supporting Trump like that.

    I especially enjoyed seeing Sen Lankgord splat the Clinton’s campaign GPSF behavior in Stephanopolis’s face. I haven’t seen that done as effectively before yhat interview.

    I do think these jerks are just leveraging rumors from the Bolton book, which is why every one of them is asking the same question in every interview.

    The real answer to that question is to keep reiterating what Giuliani is uncovering and reminding everyone of how stupendously corrupt it was for Biden’s son to be at Burisma. But for too many of them that answer would be too hypocritical, which all those disgusting propagandists know.

    Liked by 3 people

  7. CharterOakie says:

    Don’t know if anyone else raised this:

    Langford does a fairly good job, but wtf is he doing saying that Giuliani is conducting oppo research for the next campaign??

    That’s STUPID.

    Giuliani has said several times why he was in Ukraine gathering evidence and taking sworn statements: at the time his client, the POTUS, was still the target of the Muller-Weissman attempt to frame him for “obstruction of justice” related to the bogus allegations of collusion with Russians in the 2016 campaign.

    It’s not difficult to understand!

    Liked by 4 people

    • CharterOakie says:

      ^ Lankford


    • valuethetruth says:

      Oklahoma Senator James Lankford is firmly on the record for whining about President Trump’s demeanor, and since Koch Industries is his Number One Contributor, he acts against the president’s immigration position whenever possible. Lankford didn’t so much support President Trump today as he pointed out facts that any intellectually honest person could see and understand.

      Lankford took no risk in this appearance. and as others have pointed out, missed opportunities to make some stronger points. The Guiliani thing was just a way for him to ding the president, which is why ABC booked Lankford in the first place. He just didn’t ding President Trump as much as they had hoped.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Horace says:

        Lankford is a globalist POS. Republican-flavored globalists have their own interests in opposing impeachment. That does not make them on the side of the American people. They are still hell bent on replacing us with an open borders open society with open immigration for 30 pieces of silver from their transnational corporate masters.


  8. The trolls are getting better training, I’ll say that.


  9. I mean, they used to be easier to spot, they still are but not as easy. Jus sayin……..


  10. James Groome says:

    I’m sorry… I thought everyone realized that EVERYTHING the DEMOCRATS are doing has been co-ordinated with the e-media… I mean what in the hell do you think the delay was about, other than getting the order and line up down pat? ? ?

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Troublemaker10 says:

    Bam! That is the way Republicans should do interviews.

    Someone above pointed out how they used the Sanders approach by asking, “is it ok for a President to solicit foreign interference in our election” (assuming Trump did that in order to manipulate their viewers).

    They need to come up with a term for that type of press behavior and be sure to point it out and call the press out on it every darn time — then adjust their answer accordingly .

    Maybe they should call it “Sanders”….as in “don’t try to Sanders me”.


  12. Rynn69 says:

    Notice how Hack George is more concerned with a foreign country investigating Biden than our own justice department. Let that sink in.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. rah says:

    Two things crystal clear. Stephanopoulos has already convicted the POTUS in his mind.
    Senator Lankford was kicking little George’s ass so badly that I’m sure he wished he could give the cut him off sign.
    I do have to ask. Why didn’t Senator Lankford ask little George why he believes that a person who just happens to be a candidate should be immune to investigation when there is obvious probable cause?


  14. The Boss says:

    Nice conclusion about Deripaska as the “unwitting” PSS! Makes perfect sense. Perhaps Oleg has had speaks with a certain John Durham, which would help explain this 12/9/19 press release by Mr. Durham re the IG report on Russia. Note the 3rd sentence.

    “I have the utmost respect for the mission of the Office of Inspector General and the comprehensive work that went into the report prepared by Mr. Horowitz and his staff. However, our investigation is not limited to developing information from within component parts of the Justice Department. Our investigation has included developing information from other persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”

    Liked by 1 person

  15. JimFromNH says:

    Stephanopoulos has always been a sneak, but Lankford handled him very well.
    George heard and filed the Oppo Research remark, but knew he was running out of time & couldn’t pursue it well.
    Steffie also needed time to evaluate if that remark was just bait, in case Lankford was trying to further push his buttons.


  16. akaPatience says:

    Re: Lankford’s remark about “oppo research”. I suspect this was by design and not a slip of the tongue. Oppo research is something all pols indulge in, and by bringing it up Lankford got to remind the audience that Clinton employed a Brit who contacted Russians for some of hers, LOL!!! Plus, this was probably safer than characterizing Giuliani as a freelance criminal investigator, thus falling into the trap GS tried to set by saying it was the DOJ’s job to investigate Biden..

    Liked by 1 person

  17. Beth says:

    Would it be so offensive to say to every anchor:
    “Sir. The democrat managers have no shame: THEY LIE BY OMISSION.”

    The TRUTH is an affirmative defense.


    • sturmudgeon says:

      Is there ANY reason that one cannot state things offensive to these ‘anchors’? They have been ‘offensive’ for decades.


  18. aarmad says:

    I watched most of this and Lankford did a great job of getting the truth out! Steffo could not break him. It was EPIC!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s