Another Carefully Timed National Security Council Leak? – John Bolton Book Manuscript Leaked to New York Times…

The timing, purpose and narrative engineering here are transparent in the extreme.

Tonight the New York Times (Schmidt and Haberman) write an article claiming to have exclusively gained portions of a transcript of a John Bolton book manuscript that was given to the White House National Security Council for pre-publication review.

Of course The Times attempts to frame the narrative around the need for John Bolton to testify in the Senate Impeachment Trial… all too transparent in motive. Timed to work around the House fraud; impeachment article construction without Judicial review for subpoenas; and timed to bolster House managers’ unconstitutional demand for Bolton as a Senate witness.  ADD: POTUS Responds:

However, setting aside the nothing-burger details of the book as leaked, the leak itself might now reconcile an earlier event.

Remember the issue a little more than a week ago when the National Security Council senior director for European and Russian affairs, Andrew Peek, was escorted from the White House grounds and is said to be under a security-related investigation?

On Friday January 17th, 2020, the National Security Council senior director for European and Russian affairs, Andrew Peek, was escorted from the White House grounds and is currently under a security investigation.

There are few details about why Peek was physically removed and is under a very serious investigation; however, some of Andrew Peek’s professional background details tell a story.  The connection to Gen. John Allen is a MASSIVE warning flare.

Andrew Peek, the senior director for European and Russian affairs at the National Security Council, has been placed on administrative leave pending a security-related investigation, people familiar with the situation tell Axios.

First the Daily Mail:

[…] Peek had been in the NSC role for just two months, after most recently working as a deputy assistant secretary of state with responsibility for Iran and Iraq.

[…] Peek had been expected to attend the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland next week with Trump and other top aides. However, he is currently on leave pending a security-related investigation, people familiar with the situation told Axios.

[…] Peek served as a U.S. Army intelligence officer who worked under General John Allen in Afghanistan.

[…] Prior to joining the Trump administration, Peek served as a U.S. Army intelligence officer who worked under General John Allen in Afghanistan.

[…] He was also a national security adviser to Senator Gordon Smith, an Oregon Republican, and Senator Mike Johanns, a Nebraska Republican.  (link)

From a Bloomberg article:

[…] Peek previously served as a deputy assistant secretary of State for Iraq and Iran, and he was seen as an ally of Robert O’Brien.

As we shared at the time:…

[…] Andrew Peek came from the State Department.  Because the appointment happened in the past two months, it would appear Andrew Peek was recommended by the Dept. of State and accepted for the NSC post by National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien.

Here’s how it looks:  Andrew Peek was a mole.  A resistance spy sent into the Trump administration as part of the allied deep state resistance effort.  Someone caught him attempting to access something, and here’s how CTH can tell (keep reading).

Suspicious Cat remains suspicious…

The message from Bolton’s publisher:

The House motive here, the forethought within the design, is very important now because it explains why they are vociferously demanding witnesses in the Senate.  The House plan was always to work around the ability of the executive branch to go to court. The managers are now attempting to execute that plan, along with a manufactured political talking point, in the Senate trial.

The House crew intended for this to unfold exactly as it is happening.

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Impeachment, media bias, Nancy Pelosi, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Typical Prog Behavior, Ukraine, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

484 Responses to Another Carefully Timed National Security Council Leak? – John Bolton Book Manuscript Leaked to New York Times…

  1. mylabs5 says:

    Here’s the silver lining of Bolton’s entrance into this fray.
    He’ll never get another job or position of importance in government or NGOs that circle around this.
    Who would want to hire a guy you can’t essentially trust. Someone who sells his soul for 30 pieces of silver whether true to what is insinuated in the NYT or not? Doesn’t matter whether he’s on Trump’s side or the other. He’s blabbed for a promise of money. He shot his cred.
    He’s toast. And good riddance.

    Liked by 3 people

    • John Good says:

      Why would John Bolton care about a job, he is going to be set for life from his book deals!

      If I were Donald J. Trump, I would call a press-conference TOMORROW & call-out all these “leakers” as the frauds that they are.

      I would say something along the lines of “There have been many damaging things said about me & my reputation, mostly by quoting anonymous-sources in tell-all books & TODAY I am ordering all these authors of these books to either reveal their sources or publicly retract on video their statements! ”

      And Please don’t flame me for not knowing that “anonymous-sources have to be protected by the Freedom of the Press Act” or some other Liberal Talking Point, because I know from experience what works & more importantly what DOESN’T work. Also, I would name all the authors, starting with John Bolton.

      President Trump has nothing to lose by doing this & EVERYTHING to lose if he does not do this!

      Can anyone see something wrong with “being honest & up-front” with the voters of the USA?

      Like

  2. plane of the ecliptic says:

    Sen. Dog Abuser jumps right on this…. as planned.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Pew-Anon says:

    It’s becoming more apparent that this whole process was as much, or more, about establishing a precedent as it was about actually removing Trump. If the Senate allows witnesses in these unprecedented circumstances wrought by the House, it will legitimize their deviant process, establishing it as precedent for all impeachments going forward, including federal judges, SC justices, cabinet members, you name it. The process is what the House wants, and ANY vote for witnesses by the Senate will give it to them.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Liberty ONE says:

    Who cares what NeoCON job Bolton say’s! UNLESS, he has witnesses and or doc’s to substantiate his allegation(s), it’s all a matter of he said , she said.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. Kay Sadeeya says:

    A very serious question I would like answered; is it better to have no NSA; CIA; FBI; DOJ; State Department, or an utterly failed and corrupt one? We all know what would happen if we barred the doors on those departments until we could purge the corruption; our enemies would be working for our demise even more than they are now. So may I challenge to end the madness that those who have been responsible for making those institutions ineffective because of lack of trust and integrity, and are making it dangerous for America to defend herself against her enemies, while within those departments there is incompetence due to corruption.
    The answer is; It has to end soon and those responsible tried for treason, prosecuted by the law and if necessary executed XPD with extreme prejudice.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s