Day Four – Senate Impeachment Trial – 1:00pm Livestream…

There will be 24 hours of presentation by House Impeachment Managers (over 3 days); 24 hours of presentation by Defense team (over 3 days); 16 hours of Senate questioning; 4 hours of closing arguments, equally divided; and then a Senate debate/vote on further motions to include witnesses. If there are going to be witnesses, they will first be deposed prior to testimony. No witness testimony will be permitted without first being deposed.

The Senate Trial continues today on day four 1:00pm EST. Today is the third and final 8 hour day of arguments by House Impeachment Managers.

Fox10 News Livestream LinkFox News LinkCSPAN LinkPBS News Link

.

.

.

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Impeachment, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, propaganda, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

299 Responses to Day Four – Senate Impeachment Trial – 1:00pm Livestream…

  1. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Liked by 9 people

    • oodeluph says:

      It was announced that a Saturday session was called for President Trump’s team to begin their turn at bat. A Saturday session? After the unrelieved, obscene, poisonous, repetitive vituperation vomited up by the Jackass Party? To a Senate so stupefied by the clown show that some just got up and left, fidgeted and fell asleep and iPhones and watches were blatantly in use, when strictly forbidden, with no action taken by the Iago of the Supreme Court, John Roberts? THIS is supposed to be “fair”? Fair to whom???
      Once again, the Turtle is insuring that a level playing field is not in the cards for President Trump. Although technically being granted, due process isn’t being observed. The Trump team will destroy the charges that were thrown at Trump like a full chamber pot but who’s supposed to watch and hear it? Certainly not a Senate so enervated by the stupidity drummed at them for the previous sessions, without a break!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Bubby says:

        The Republicans have let the Democrats use the Senate to campaign for 2020! Simple as that. If the Republicans allow witnesses subject to executive privilege the impeachment will last until election day!

        Liked by 1 person

      • Dances with Wolverines says:

        Saturday is a day off for most Americans. Those who feel so strongly about having the President’s team present their case on Saturday should jump in their cars, board airplanes and choo choo trains and head to D.C. to voice their opinion and support the President and his team. Nothing is stopping you except your very own negativity

        Liked by 3 people

      • bayoukiki says:

        Oh I think it will be fine. 3 hours on Saturday then they come back Monday. I think the DJT will have the attention of the Senate. That will be what the senators think about over the weekend – the final word on Saturday

        Liked by 3 people

        • ms doodlebug says:

          Having the ‘last word’ is a valuable technique. It’s like a movie trailer that whets one’s desire to see the movie. The only thing that may be missing is the background music to set the mood. The music, of course, could be accomplished with a few brief clips of President Trump’s campaign rallies…”You cain’t always get what you want but if you try sometime you just might find you get what you need…” Stay tuned, folks, as we go down to the demonstration…

          Like

      • Pokey says:

        Keep your cool, oodeluph, The Turtle has this.

        Like

    • bertdilbert says:

      Impeachment was dead on arrival. Trump has 95% approval rating among republicans and any vote for impeachment is a death sentence. Nobody is going to walk the plank.

      Trump could be a mass murderer and would still survive impeachment. Get the vote to acquit and move on already.

      Liked by 4 people

    • mopar2016 says:

      Gotta love Pat Cipollone and Jammin Jay Sekulow.
      They know where we stand.

      Liked by 5 people

  2. pucecatt says:

    Can this Parnas guy be prosecuted for recording POTUS ? Could this be the insurance policy ? How long has this guy been in the picture ?

    Like

  3. RC23321 says:

    So the new lib talking point is that Trump actually ordered the assassination of Yovanovitch. LOL

    No bs. It’s all over the “news”.

    Like

  4. Bogeyfree says:

    So if PT was going to declassify anything, what specific documents would be best for him to declassify and allow his attorneys to present next week?

    I would love to see PT order the declassification of something that can be used to show all Americans this whole thing has been a fraud from day one and shut Shifty up once and for all.

    Like

    • RC23321 says:

      SD has posted the list roughly 125 times.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Dutchman says:

        Very little if any of the material on SD’s list applies to Ukraine, or directly to the issue.
        Yes, I KNOW Ukraine is Muh Russia 2.0, but in any criminal trial, if the defence tried to bring up a previous attempt by the prosecutors, to unseccesfully charge/prosecute their client for a different crime, they probably wouldn’t be able to admit such evidence.

        So, expecting PDJT’s legal team to try to admit declassified material off SD’s list, is a nice fantasy, but don’t hold your breath.
        IMHO

        Like

  5. sunnyflower5 says:

    ABC/Washington Post
    “Remove President Trump”

    Such language Washing Post. I’m shook! 😱

    Liked by 6 people

  6. hawkins6 says:

    I think most of us are anticipating a well planned defense tomorrow and wondering how much of the Hillary/Obama Dem’s continuously corrupt and illegal efforts to depose the President from early 2016 to today’s impeachment atrocity will be mentioned.

    I would love to see one of the most articulate members standing at the podium with his back to Justice Roberts, mention that even the FISA Court betrayed or failed to protect the President’s and his campaign staff’s basic civil rights for years. ie. As the camera zooms toward Justice Roberts face, the team member can state, “Justice Boasberg has confirmed so far that at least 2 FISA warrants were “invalid” and therefore Carter Page and others on Trump’s team were illegally spied on because those in charge of the FISA Court failed miserably to exercise their responsibilities to the nation…”

    How’s that for payback for the unjust inclusion and admonishment of Mr. Cipollone by Roberts?

    This would be very entertaining for sure but it would not be wise to enrage the head honcho on SCOTUS, so the defense will likely concentrate on the Constitutional arguments, the absence of a crime, the lack of evidence, Schiff’s nefariously long and despicable record of proven lies and corrupt behavior and so on.

    Liked by 12 people

    • Carly says:

      I like the way you think, hawkins6! Gosh, if only conservatives could boldly lay out the truth like that in front of Roberts. Roberts is truly awful.

      Liked by 1 person

    • joebkonobi says:

      The dems brought muh Russia into their discussions, so I will be disappointed if President Trumps defense does not at least make a point of pointing out that two of the four FISA warrants have now been determined to be illegal (FISC words), and DOJ will not validate the veracity of the other two. No need to feature Roberts but definitely could be used to respond to the dems Putin, Putin, Putin etc.

      Liked by 1 person

    • WRB says:

      Jay Sekulow mentioned the invalid FISAs in a short presser, and as much as hinted we will hear about it tomorrow.

      Liked by 3 people

  7. cboldt says:

    Sylvia garcia has chutzpah. Tells of being in “baby judge” class. Talks about how important it is to be patient. To listen. To give both side a fair hearing.
    Can you imagine this tyrant as a judge? Well, maybe so. Decision first, trial later.

    Like

  8. franklinknight says:

    As House Managers near the end of their presentation, recall Proverbs 18:17 (The Message)

    17  The first speech in a court case is always convincing—
    until the cross-examination starts!

    Liked by 6 people

    • Dutchman says:

      I have witnessed it many times. The Prosecution presents its case, and all Courtroom observers say “Guilty”.

      Then, the Defence has ITS turn, and the same observers say “innocent”. Happens all the time.

      Liked by 2 people

      • WRB says:

        In this special case, the Prosecution presents its case, and all Courtroom observers say “Guilty” “What a putz!”

        Liked by 1 person

      • jello333 says:

        Right. But once in awhile, like the Zimmerman trial, the Prosecution is SO bad, actually helpful to the Defense, that it’s pretty much over at that point. Only reason for the Defense to even put on their case is to move the needle from “not guilty” to “innocent”.

        Like

        • Dutchman says:

          Rare. Exoneration, so far as I know, is not a LEGAL term, its a perceptual one.

          No court exhonerates you; you are found “not guilty”, you are,NOT declared or found “innocent”. Its the public perception from, as you say the trial, that detirmines that your not just not guilty, but innocent.

          And, it can go the other way; O.J. was found “not guilty”, but he was NOT percieved as “innocent”, and was not exhonerated.

          Liked by 1 person

    • Boots says:

      The first to state his case seems just, until another comes and examines him.

      Like

  9. dogsmaw says:

    Liked by 7 people

  10. Troublemaker10 says:

    Democrats Distort Alexander Hamilton Quote

    https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2020/01/24/democrats-distort-alexander-hamilton-quote/

    Excerpt:

    Here’s the quote. “When a man unprincipled in private life, desperate in his fortune, bold in his temper, despotic in his ordinary demeanor, known to have scoffed in private at the principles of liberty, when such a man is seen to mount the hobbyhorse of popularity to join the cry of danger to liberty, to take every opportunity of embarrassing the general government and bringing it under suspicion to flatter and fall with all the nonsense of the zealots of the day, it may justly be suspected that his object is to throw things into confusion that he may ride the storm and direct the whirlwind.”

    That quote is a note from Alexander Hamilton. He wrote it in response to George Washington. Schiff offered the quote in full and suggested that it was part of the reason founders like Hamilton put impeachment in the Constitution. Nadler did the same thing. But guess what? Hamilton did not say this in the context of impeachment. It was from a note that he wrote when he was the secretary of the Treasury in response to George Washington about tax policy.

    The letter in which Hamilton wrote these words doesn’t even mention impeachment. It’s from 1792. That’s five years after the Constitution was drafted. They are lying through their teeth about everything.

    Liked by 8 people

  11. dogsmaw says:

    Obama On Executive Actions: ‘I’ve Got A Pen And I’ve Got A Phone’ http://cbsloc.al/JYNE7G

    Liked by 2 people

  12. L4grasshopper says:

    GOP FL Sen Rick Scott on trial:

    We saw that protester yell something bad about Chuck Schumer. I’m thinking about possibly doing the same thing so the Sergeant- at-Arms will take me out also. This is ridiculous. We’ve heard the same thing three days in a row.

    Liked by 5 people

  13. Mr e-man says:

    So if the rules are 24 hours over 3 days (Sundays excluded), the defense could do 2 hours on Saturday and 11 hours on Monday and 11 more on Tuesday or any combination thereof.

    I wonder what they will choose.

    Liked by 1 person

    • mimbler says:

      They have said 3 hours on saturday as a preview only. Haven’t heard how much on Mon and Tue, but I don’t expect them to use all 24 hours. They don’t need to, and it just bores the people they need to convince.

      Liked by 3 people

      • bleep21k says:

        @mimbler – I dont think they need 24 hours either.

        Concerning article I ABUSE of Power: A few hours defining “abuse of power” as rather “separation of powers” – flesh it out a bit – and as celebrity chef Emril Lagasse used to say “BAM”!

        Then article II OBSTRUCTION of congress (lmao!!): the words “inquiry” vs “investigation” and the lack of legal authority to subpoena ANYTHING because it was an “inquiry”, not an “investigation” – 1 hour tops with nancy on video saying the words “inquiry” – and again with the Emiril…”BAM”!

        One day, call it a “not tired of winning yet”! Drop the mic.

        Send em home to mama…

        Liked by 2 people

    • I’ll tell you what they won’t be doing…they won’t be repeating a fairy story that’s unsupported by the evidence for 24 hours.

      Liked by 6 people

  14. MILupper says:

    Just saw the dem blond bomber whats her name say that waiting for the courts to rule on subpoenas could take years. Impeach now and remove PDJT now.

    She is very upset that the dems don’t get special treatment from the courts. Doesn’t like that they are being treated like anyone of the little people who have cases before the courts.

    Like

    • Admin says:

      Think about what she is saying. She claims the courts could take years to rule so remove him now. And what happens if the court rules against them? Then they have prematurely removed a President because of testimony that would have not been legally entitled to.

      This is no different than a prosecutor telling the judge to sentence a defendant to death because it could take years for the courts to determine just how dangerous the defendant is. There is no recourse available for POTUS and something carried out unjustly. Besides, removal of POTUS would basically remedy their lawsuits for subpoenas moot and no ruling needed since he would have been removed.

      This is exactly why the people have elected POTUS. Once again we get to see the two-tier justice system on display. Laws and rules for thee, but for we (Democrats).

      Liked by 6 people

  15. calbear84 says:

    How can we take anything seriously when it’s being said by “resistance” members?
    Sorry, but you don’t get to claim objectivity after announcing such a stance. On top of that, the blatant hypocrisy of Dems complaining about abuse of power after eight years of Obama is infuriating!

    Liked by 5 people

    • joebkonobi says:

      Not to mention their own abuse of power in getting their shitshow to the Senate. I’m pretty sure Trumps defense team will make that abundantly clear.

      Liked by 3 people

  16. booger71 says:

    Oh Noes…the Prince of Zumunda is talking again.

    Like

  17. BruceC says:

    ‘Impeachment Polka’ composed in 1868 by Charles D. Blake for the impeachment of President Andrew Johnson.

    Would be funny if some one could use this music as background for Schiff’s and Nadler’s speeches during the ‘trial’.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. gabytango says:

    My question is: What in the world kind of questions are the malicious, lying Democrats going to ask?? They know they are lying, they KNOW nothing they’ve said is the truth. And, since this is the case, aren’t they afraid of the answers they will get?

    Like

  19. jello333 says:

    “final 8 hour day of arguments by House Impeachment Managers.”

    Final? FINAL?! Wait, what? You mean we don’t get to hear them anymore after this? Oh God… you know that feeling you get when you’re reading a really, really good book, and you’re getting down to the last few pages? You start to get kinda depressed knowing that before long it’ll all be over. You just wish it could go on and on instead. Well, that’s kind the felling I’m getting now, knowing Mr. Schiff and his magnificent team are about to conclude their orations. I don’t know how I’ll….

    Ah, never mind! I had planned to write a long tear-filled, rambling, sarcastic post… but now, even in jest, I’m kinda making myself gag. So I’m done… 😀

    Liked by 1 person

  20. TwoLaine says:

    The words you never want to hear from Adam Sh1t: “I want to start out where we began.”

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! NOT AGAIN!!!!!!!!!

    Liked by 3 people

  21. TwoLaine says:

    Only 2.3k watching Fox 10 Phoenix. 🙂

    Liked by 4 people

  22. dogsmaw says:

    Liked by 2 people

  23. Sean Supsky says:

    wow schiffy is only prattling on now

    Like

  24. MDNA I says:

    Liked by 1 person

  25. i'm just sayin'.. says:

    Shifty’s dancing as fast as he can….

    Like

  26. Dances with Wolverines says:

    Adam Schiff, you are… The Weakest Link!…. Goodbye

    Liked by 2 people

  27. sunnyflower5 says:

    36 hours of outlandish remarks to use in their Facebook Ads….since Facebook won’t remove Ads that are untrue.

    Like

  28. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 3 people

  29. jello333 says:

    Question:

    Was anything written into the rules concerning interruptions / objections during the 24-hour “presentation” periods?

    The reason I ask is that there were clearly, obviously MANY MANY irrelevant, “beyond the scope”, and just clearly FALSE statements made by the Dems. And yet (as far as I’ve heard) not one peep from the Rep side. So I’m assuming that means they weren’t ALLOWED to object… sort of like you rarely hear an objection during opening statements in a criminal trial. At least I HOPE that’s why it happened. Because if Reps were just “playing nice” and wanting to just let the Dems keep digging their holes, it’s gonna get REAL ugly once the Reps start talking. Because you KNOW that, if allowed, the Dems will be jumping up and interrupting non-stop.

    So… does anyone know what the rules have to say about this?

    Like

  30. sunnyflower5 says:

    Adam Schitt reading from the script of Game of Thorns— “heads on a pike”. What an sick idiot.

    Like

  31. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 1 person

  32. Troublemaker10 says:

    Republican senators outraged after Schiff repeats ‘head will be on a pike’ report

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/republican-senators-outraged-after-schiff-repeats-head-will-be-on-a-pike-report?_amp=true&__twitter_impression=true

    Excerpt:

    GOP Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski was “PISSED,” Politico reporter John Burgess Everett tweeted in capital letters afterward. He then quoted her saying, “He was going fine with moral courage until he got to ‘head on a pike.’ That’s where he lost me.”

    Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine repeated, “That’s not true,” while shaking her head, according to CNN’s Manu Raju. Idaho Sen. Jim Risch said the same thing while Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas laughed.

    Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming said Schiff “offended every Republican senator” and denied that any of his GOP colleagues had ever heard such a threat.

    Liked by 2 people

  33. paintbrushsage says:

    Super fun!

    Like

  34. paintbrushsage says:

    Catherine Herridge must be so proud. #FactsMatter

    Like

  35. 6x47 says:

    I like that Rudy is now giving dates and amounts of the bribes received by Joe Biden. He definitely has the goods, and if Joe Biden is dumb enough to sue him for defamation Rudy will be more than happy to drop it all right on his head. Good times.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s