John Ratcliffe: Adam Schiff’s “Media Leaks to Frame Impeachment Narrative Are False”….

Representative John Ratcliffe appears with Martha MacCallum to discuss the ongoing closed-door testimony from officials upset about President Trump’s unorthodox approach to foreign policy.

Mr. Ratcliffe notes the purposeful leaks from Chairman Adam Schiff and his Lawfare staff to their aligned media scribes are intentionally false by design.

This entry was posted in Big Stupid Government, Cold Anger, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Election 2020, Impeachment, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, THE BIG UGLY, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

137 Responses to John Ratcliffe: Adam Schiff’s “Media Leaks to Frame Impeachment Narrative Are False”….

    • CountryDoc says:

      Video unavailable


      • foodog says:

        works for me.

        A tip- sometimes with a slow connection or a website like CTH the embedded video may run slow. A solution is to click on the Youtube symbol at lower right to get a usually faster streaming version opened in a new tab.

        Liked by 5 people

      • donna kovacevic says:

        Video all good for me here in ticked off Canada.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Austin Holdout says:

          Genuine condolences to you and all Canadian Treepers, Donna.

          Liked by 1 person

          • old white guy says:

            Conservative Canadians need free passage and green cards asap. Need to go somewhere where there is more freedom. I am not sure how much longer the U.S. will have freedom. The dems are working hard to destroy the constitution and the rule of law. I know, a white self sufficient Canadian would not be welcome.


    • ann says:

      This man knows how to communicate clearly.

      Helpful explaination of what is going on, all the jargon about quid pro quo obscures the point.

      If I am tracking accurately, the Democrats want to legitimise this pattern of financial & political predation that privledged elites in our government have gotten away with because the DoJ never prosecuted them. Hence, a Beltway culture has evolved that normalises conduct that compromises our foreign policy, and destroys our reputation in international relations. It also degrades the institutions & corrodes the integrity within our body politic.

      In Ukraine, that includes intruding into domestic affairs, esp muscling in to co opt control of developing markets & profitable industries,

      Also, Biden is recorded chortling about insisting the prosecution of his son be dropped before releasing funds,
      which I do not know why the hell we’d be handing out to Ukraine anyways!

      Why involve ourselves in Ukraine, which already has enough problems with corruption ? Then the beltway stampedes over to pile on? .

      We had a generation of politicians whose deficiency in statesmanship has created messes far beyond our own borders. .

      So the impeachers claim , in vernacular, is that swamp drainage is grounds for political impeachment of POTUS?
      What the HELL do they think we voted him in for? President Trump is doing his job. There is something about the bogus crap re DNC hacks, more of their damn unsecured servers , and other murky doings . Why are we bogged down with Democrats trail of shady deals with underworld characters and Blumenthal types?

      their drsmatic concoctions are an energy sink.

      Anyway, this guy described a specific interaction, explained the technique the interrogators use to distort facts by leading the witness” . And he isn’t chicken to cite names either.

      Liberate Our country, sir. Or we will have to.

      Liked by 7 people

      • Mark L. says:

        Well stated. George Webb and Lee Stranahan do a credible job of explaining the Ukraine connection. Money, Guns, Drugs and of course kickbacks. The big ball of string is coming unraveled. Will AG do anything? Time will tell.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Pa Hermit says:

      Why do we never hear about those supposed sure fire i9mpeachment points? All we hear are questions to Republicans trying to keep pointing out there is no quid pro quo. Why not ask these Dems to produce these findings instead of just saying they have proof! Shiff said he had evidence about Russia but never produced it yet no one has queried him about it! Always asking the Republicans to defend against the Dems. Ask the Dems to put up or shut up! The pressure is ALWAYS on the GOP side!

      Liked by 1 person

  1. Don McAro says:

    Every leftist story I read…Starts out with William Taylor…Believes…Not William Taylor Knows…
    This is how you know… check it out

    Liked by 6 people

  2. SAM-TruthFreedomLiberty says:

    What are D’s hiding?

    It’s a lynching..

    (some bad words)

    Liked by 11 people

  3. decisiontime16 says:

    We don’t have even a somewhat respectable congress. It is being run by a criminal enterprise.

    Liked by 15 people

    • Finbar O'Shaunnessey says:

      And it is shocking the things they can do with impunity.

      Liked by 3 people

    • annieoakley says:


      Liked by 1 person

    • Daniel says:

      When you talk about this (if you have the courage, and I spectrum this to all readers) it’s incredibly important to point out something which should be painfully obvious — they aren’t following the law or the process. They don’t expect to win. They [both sides] are making a lot of noise in prefer to appeal to your confirmation bias. This is more about campaigning and complaining than any genuine process.

      Everyone needs to try to see beyond the noise to look at what they are trying to accomplish.

      Democrats can’t run on prosperity. They can’t run on any sort of popular policy. They can’t even run on the race card because in case you haven’t noticed, race relations are actually better under Trump than under Obama. This is all they’ve got and they are playing the heck out off it… Talk about beating a dead donkey…

      Liked by 5 people

  4. SAM-TruthFreedomLiberty says:

    Quid Pro Joe on (impeachment) Lynching:

    Liked by 4 people

  5. Right to reply says:

    I thought Schiff was being censured?


  6. MAGADJT says:

    Sick of this garbage. If this behavior is so scandalous, so wrong, and all the assertions are lies, is there nothing anyone can do to stop it? All they want to do is go on TV and whine. They need to start fighting fire with fire.

    Liked by 8 people

    • Fish and hunt says:

      The majority make the rules. No transcripts to be shown. No cameras. No subpoena power. Guys like Ratcliffe are doing what they can, countering the narrative the Dems selectively release of info trying to expose the corrupt process. They have no power to change it

      Liked by 1 person

      • Daniel says:

        Just remember that when Republicans Erin the house back and keep the Senate. Then tell me why they have become as quiet and worthless as they were before.

        They make noise because it is safe to be noisy. Heck, it’s more profitable! They are more than happy to say what you want to hear when they know they aren’t expected to back it up.

        Liked by 1 person

      • mopar2016 says:

        Ratcliffe and Zeldin both voted with the democrats on HR77.
        It’s hard for me to take them serious.


    • No, We The People need to start fighting fire with fire. “We” sit around in our homes writing comments that say “THEY” need to do this, and “THEY” need to do that…

      “They” aren’t going to. We should already know this in the way we know the sky is blue and the grass is green.

      And who is “they” to you, republicrats? FFS cocaine mitch would impeach OUR VSG President. He said so… because he means it.

      I am not trying to admonish you or anyone else, truly I’m not. I’m simply trying to say it’s GO TIME.

      We have to stop thinking “they” are going to help and help our President ourselves. Whatever it is that you can do, now’s the time. We aren’t active and vocal like the insane zombies the UniParty dhimmicrats have, but we need to be, without the insane and without the violence of course. Whew, so much insanity. We’ll get much more of it too, if we don’t light the bigger fire to fight with.

      Sundance has left a trail of truth nearly four years long, bring people to it as a digital soldier of truth. It could go a long way for freedom and liberty, and doesn’t take much longer than making the comments we do here…

      Take some slings and arrows for President Trump! 😉

      Ok, #TreeperArmy, end rant. I’ll shut up again, starting… Now.

      For now. L 😀 L

      Liked by 4 people

    • scruffyleon says:

      Can anything be done? Yes. Never vote another Democrat in to ANY elected office in the US.


  7. Parker Longbaugh says:

    A bunch of voters in California elected that moron Salwell and I think they did it on purpose. The only way that idiot would leave his home town was by sending him to DC.

    I was not a bully. I am not a bully. But I would pay a 1000.00 to see a pay per view that was nothing but him getting punched in the face i think I have found a means by which he could fund his next Presidential run.

    Liked by 1 person

    • RobInPA says:

      I’d love to see a return of “Celebrity Deathmatch”, but themed on the small crop of White Hats vs. The D.C. Swamp!

      We could watch PDJT simultaneously reaching into Schitt and Pelosi, pulling out their guts and yanking them inside out!

      Maybe call it MAGA Match?!


    • KE Thompson says:

      I live in Swalwell’s district in the town where Kate Steinle was raised. Don’t blame us, This used to be the only solid Republican district in the Bay Area. At each redistricting, they kept changing the lines incrementally, until they had enough communities “over the hill” that are more urban to dilute our votes. The 15th district was originally located in the San Jose area, some 40 miles from here. We have been so gerrymandered over the past 20 years that our representative often changes from election to election, two years ago (and I still can’t explain it), Swalwell wasn’t on my ballot, my representative was Ro Khanna, then in 2018 Swalwell was back as the choice. In my part of the district, we all voted for Rudy Peters, a navy veteran, but couldn’t overcome the votes from Hayward, Union City, and Castro Valley.


    • Louisiana Tea Rose says:

      Surely you jest.

      We can watch AntiFa do that crap to people they hate as they debase their “cause”. I fully expect you to protect yourself, but act like the responsible citizen you are. Take the rhetorical path instead, it makes you look better than them while our country watches.

      I would rather keep my branch and watch him grovel, as he will in short measure. Universal Precautions, don’t get contaminated with body fluids….ya just don’t know where that “dude” has dipped his wick.


  8. Tiffthis says:

    I tell you what, Schiffs skin looks worse with each passing day, stress related? He lied about “having proof” about Russia and these leaks are most likely lies too.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. NC Nana says:

    John Ratcliffe is excellent at bringing an understanding of the law to the everyday citizen.

    Thank God he is in the Congress at a time that we need him to help us through the lies, deceit and misdirection of the Democrats.

    Bless you Congressman Ratcliffe.

    Liked by 8 people

  10. bullnuke says:

    She had to throw in the bogus polls at the end. Fox News is becoming CNN/MSNBC

    Liked by 4 people

    • ezpz2 says:

      I agree that in a lot of ways, Fox is no better than the other networks, maybe even worse in a way because they sneak lefty stuff in under the umbrella of being conservative, thinking that gives them credibility.

      However, in this case, I think she was referring to the swing state polls showing that majorities in those states DON’T want impeachment.

      Still, she used the bad poll as a reference point.

      Okay, finished with my ‘on the one hand / on the other hand’ little speech, Libra style.😊 ♎️


  11. MAGADJT says:

    LOL! Hannity brought Graham on tonight and acted like Graham was doing the most powerful countermove against the dems in history. It turns out Graham is going to go all out and introduce a ‘resolution’ in the Senate that rebukes the House of Representatives for the way they are conducting their ‘inquiry’.

    Give me a break. This is how Republicans fight – with toothless resolutions, Guarantee the only reason Graham is even going this far is because he’s getting calls to his office over his recent non-committal comments about impeachment.

    Liked by 8 people

  12. paul_in_STL says:

    I’ve had my suspicions about the integrity of William Taylor. The text message seemed a little too perfect in explicitly suggesting a “quid pro quo”. It seems about as genuine as the setting up of Papadopoulos. I would wager anything that he was working with Schiff and Co. to craft that text as just another breadcrumb to be “discovered” later as corroboration. The hope was probably to get an ambiguous response which could have been spun as further corroboration. Luckily it appears to have been just as explicitly shot down by Sondheim at the time. It would be nice if while he was being “deposed” under penalty of perjury he was asked about any contact with Schiff et al.

    Liked by 5 people

    • yep, Bill Taylor’s tweet sounded more like something you’d hear from Opie Taylor…. gosh, geez Pa, there should be no bad optics here…. totally out of the blue in context and forced/inserted into the text exchange…. Sondland handled it perfectly.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Eaglemom says:

      Well ,Schiff’s staff member went to Ukraine in August and met with Taylor. I think Taylor kept calling and texting Sondland to set him up. Taylor doesn’t have anything, it’s all his “feelings” and what he thought was going on from 2nd and 3rd sources. I was really worried this morning about Taylor because I thought he was going to be one of their star witnesses with documents etc. but he had nothing. I feel much better tonight 🙂

      Liked by 3 people

    • California Joe says:

      Why does President Trump hand out plum ambassador jobs (and White House advisor jobs) to blatant Obama people? Does he think these Leftist fanatics are going to like him. In any other administration since George Washington positions of trust like ambassador are given to wealthy supporters who have donated millions of dollars to the presidential candidate’s campaign not to enemies!


      • CountryDoc says:

        To trap them?

        Liked by 2 people

      • Mbr says:

        Maybe the whole thing is a set up by Trump and Pompeo.


      • Sherri Young says:

        Some of these people like Taylor and Yuvanovich are career diplomats. I think Taylor came back from retirement to serve as Charge’.

        The Resistance has slowed down even diplomatic confirmations. Somebody had to fill those positions in an acting capacity so that work could be done. At one point there was even discussion about how much the other countries were complaining because there was no one in place with whom they could interact.


    • Heika says:

      I believe you will find this very interesting then. Bill Taylor is uncovered for all of his ‘covert’ and very disgusting activities right here. Does a great job, and its fresh this morning. George has even offered himself as a witness for Trump given the proof he has on ‘Bill’s ‘ lack of credibility in fact – his criminality.


      • FrankieZee says:

        If the truth ever comes out, we will be amazed how many people are criminally involved in this attempt to not only overthrow this President, but to overthrow our country. 2020 is all about the survival of the USA. And sadly, the majority of the country is unaware of everything going on.

        Liked by 3 people

    • Kintbury says:

      He sent the text after his meeting with Schiff’s staff. Not fooling anyone.


  13. Ray Runge says:

    I am continually struck that we are living through interesting times.

    Not the smallest part of these interesting times is the industry that stirs the pot. Division and shocking tick tock discovery become more important than the survival of our Republic that is predicated on our constitution. Bloviators and invested interests care more about the news cycle than the larger picture of USA since 1776..

    Liked by 3 people

  14. Bigbadmike says:

    Great news! Just heard on the Marc Levin radio show that even if President Trump is impeached and removed from office, he can still run for POTUS in 2020. That means that no matter what happens, he will be elected President in 2020. The Rino and Lefty losers are gonna get what they deserve no matter what. After peach, only football stadiums for Rally’s, cause there’s going be a whole lotta people coming round.

    Liked by 3 people

  15. Tl Howard says:

    Can anyone tell me how much time a Brennan would be given to “clear his schedule” for a Durham interview?

    I’m just wondering if Brennan/Clapper will stall to give Nan time or if Barr-Durham can speed this thing up.

    Also, to anyone who might have experience with such things, would an interview of a guy like Brennan, should he choose to talk and not clam up or take the 5th, take hours or days?


    • Ray Runge says:

      With all due respect, your are imagining troubles before they happen. A common disease in the current opposition party. THINK MAGA.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Joebkonobi says:

        With the same due respect, a good manager/leader should be looking ahead at both best case and worst case scenarios and be prepared to address either, i.e., work towards best, prepare for worst just in case.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

      Wanna interview with a slick bstrd like Brennan? Don’t ask him. Send in the jackboots in the middle of the night like Mueller’s gangsters did with poor old Roger Stone. Back up the UHaul Trucks and empty out the viper’s nest. Airlift the weasel Brennan in his pajamas to a nice little air condtioned detention bungalo at Mar-A-Lago. Then they can talk about interviews, informants, immunity or imminent incarceration.

      ~~~~~~~ TRUMP 2020 ~~~~~~~

      Liked by 6 people

  16. zozz1 says:

    Republicans in House or Senate need to figure out a way to prevent an impeachment or to get it ruled illegal. Surely, with all the arcane parliamentary rules and processes that govern both House and Senate, the Republicans can find something. For sure, the Senate should not take up any impeachment referral from the House if it is done so irregularly, behind closed doors. Let them flail on…the American voters see what is happening…then shut it down.


    • Raptors2020 says:

      Republicans in House or Senate need a Man, and that Man can be a Woman. Somebody who goes on CNN or MSNBC, or any network other than Fox, and battles. When they interrupt you, keep talking. When they talk over you, start shouting. Concede nothing, never take a backward step. Ben Shapiro could teach them how it’s done. Make the points the poor souls who watch these biased networks never hear. And there’s a lot of these points. And yeah, fight dirty.
      People like Ted Cruz, who have big ambitions, need to recognize how grateful Republican voters would be to have such a champion.
      Quislings like Romney and Kasich, who think Democrats will some day like and respect them, are pathetic fools.

      Liked by 4 people

  17. DaughterofLiberty says:

    So, time for talk is over. When will the march on Washington start, and who will organize? The one thing I’ll say about bi-polar Glen Beck is the 9-12 project. He organized, and assembled a mass on Washington such that it scared the living daylights out of Jug Ears and his trans-gendered ‘wife’ (which led to the IRS targeting of conservative groups). Tired of the bitching and complaining. Tired of the outrage on social media. Time for action. Seriously. Calling the senate and house reps is a waste of time. THEY. DO. NOT. CARE. ABOUT. AMERICA. Messages to these scum go right into the circular filing cabinet.

    Liked by 5 people

  18. zimbalistjunior says:

    oy…im a fan of ratcliffe of course but i think he is making a mistake here
    similar to how we let the narrative get away from us in the russia hoax– then the only actual crime that could have been problematic was if the trump campaign conspired aided abetted etc to actually hack into the dem computer (or possibly even phish podeta)…everything else was not a crime

    here too the only possible high crime or misdemeanor is if trump asked for investigation of biden for the purpose of 2020 elections in exchange for money…thats it…everything else is kosher…a quid pro quo is kosher if its for purposes of investigating 2016 elections, rooting out corruption, looking into biden family for any other purpose beside specifically hampering his 2020 chances—and unless there is a recording of trump stating that, the black hats have nothing

    so once again i appreciate ratcliffe but stick with the law and dont give the black hats help

    Liked by 1 person

    • Whereas, when Biden said the same thing on camera, and cracked jokes about it, specifically referencing Obama, nobody said anything. Got it.

      And when billions of dollars of “aid money” were embezzled, nobody said anything then, either. Got it.


  19. Bone Fish says:

    No matter how hard he tries, Adam Schiff can’t seem to get himself fired.

    Liked by 2 people

  20. Finbar O'Shaunnessey says:

    Good people won’t run for Congress anymore. They refuse to put up with the sleaze and corruption of the Left (see Kavanaugh). That leaves us with bloodsuckers and the mentally deficient.

    Liked by 2 people

  21. SPECULATION: POTUS has an ace up his sleeve in the event of a Senate Trial
    [Repost from earlier thread]
    … Evidence that Chief Justice Roberts was compromised by Obama’s spying
    … Requiring Roberts to be resigned/recused
    … Replaced by Justice Thomas to preside over the Senate Sham Trial.

    Who thinks the trial will finish before the 2020 Election (and the 2021 Congress)
    … covering the MASSIVELY COMPLEX COUP
    … outing the COUP CO-CONSPIRATORS
    … including the Congressional GANG of EIGHT
    … compromising them and every other Senate Co-Conspirator
    … requiring them to be “RECUSED” from the SENATE JURY.
    AS PREDICTED above:

    Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told reporters he has no control over how long the Senate would take to conclude a trial if the House votes to impeach President Trump.

    “I have no idea how long this will go on,” said the Kentucky Republican…

    If the House passes articles of impeachment, the Senate would have to follow existing rules for conducting the trial unless 100 senators agreed to change the rules.

    The trial would take place every afternoon except Sunday, and Chief Justice John Roberts would preside.

    McConnell said the rules give him very little latitude about how the trial is conducted. Motions would come from Roberts, not lawmakers, unless all senators agreed…

    McConnell said “there are all kinds of potentials,” depending on what articles the House sends to the Senate.

    Liked by 2 people

    • POTUS will literally prosecute the Demo☭rats during a Senate Trial that would run NON-STOP throughout the 2020 Election.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Louisiana Tea Rose says:

      That’s a sweet lil love letter to the bitch…and he’s sending her a box of chocolates (her favorite food), too…


    • 56packardman says:

      As I wrote in another thread earlier today, we all knew that Mrs. McConnell would at some point stab the President in the back. The question was when not if. Now we know. Mrs. McConnell is quietly all-in on impeachment. We must never forget that Mrs. McConnell’s marching orders come from the U.S. Chamber of Crony Capitalists. The orders have been issued.

      Liked by 1 person

  22. CountryDoc says:

    I wish we could go back to the days when congressman solved their problems with duels

    Liked by 6 people

  23. PCS says:

    Why does Ratcliffe give credence to the issue of a quid pro quo at all? Under the President’s article 2 powers, he has the authority to ask a foreign aid recipient to jump through hoops to receive said aid. Especially if the President is making a request about potential corruption.

    Ratcliffe seems to be clueless about that aspect.

    Liked by 2 people

    • zimbalistjunior says:

      amen…see my comment above
      ratcliffe et al should learn the law and stop helping the black hats make their case
      stop acquiescing to the black hats misbegotten hypotheses—they have no basis in law

      Liked by 2 people

    • ABN says:

      I agree. When Biden did quid pro quo over the Ukraine prosecutor, it was to save his son and himself from exposure of their corruption. If POTUS had done quid pro quo (and who cares if he did), it was to save the USA from the Bidens corruption.


      • Said prosecutor gave and then published sworn testimony about what happened to him in Ukraine after Biden said what he did.

        The current Ukranian President himself ran on a “drain the swamp” ticket. Ukraine is actively pursuing criminal investigations now, and that’s what’s got their panties tied in a knot . . .

        Liked by 1 person

  24. pucecatt says:

    Just read that guys opening statement and what a crock of Schiff , so full of drama and not genuine at all , I wonder who helped him write that ? Reads like a cheesy B movie ..


  25. foodog says:

    Thanks for tipping us to these videos, Sundance.

    I am so grateful for Fox taking the time to platform Nunes, Ratcliffe and now newer up and comers like Zeldin and Stefanik,

    and with hosts like MacCallum and Bartiromo and Ingraham who are prepared but respectful, good interviewers and listeners, so they dont have to demonstrate the silly “gotcha’s” like Chris Matthews to prove his creds.

    Tucker does a great job of teeing up the issues to educate the public. This is the value of Fox, to me, of their video- respectful education, and the value to Trump is the direct line to the people, dis-intermediating the 90% LeftMedia.

    Sean Hannity and Lou Dobbs could learn a little from the ladies.
    I expect the new woman manager who took Ailes spot gets it, and I sure hope Laclan Murdoch is paying attention and doesnt fiddle to fix what aint broken.

    Liked by 2 people

  26. pucecatt says:

    These state dept idiots seem to think they were elected by the American people , think again assholes .. grrrr

    Liked by 1 person

  27. meadowlarkspring says:

    Sorry, Mike. Sometimes people can just act like political hacks….even Bill Taylor. BTW how did it feel sitting next to Biden when he recounted how he demanded firing a Ukranian prosecutor. You do you!


  28. Troublemaker10 says:

    Several Republicans have said that Ratcliff totally destroyed Taylor during his 90 seconds of questioning.

    That Taylor’s testimony was hearsay and added nothing new

    Liked by 1 person

  29. Charles Dodgson says:

    Ratcliffe represents my district. I’m still not sure if he’s trustworthy. Shortly after he took office in 2015 I emailed him and told him I wanted him to vote against Ryan for Speaker and got some vague weasly reply about how Ryan had the numbers and it would be counter-productive to oppose him, blah blah blah. Which of course was true, and he was at that point a freshman rep, but I would have liked to see some backbone.

    He may be MAGA, or he may just realize his political future in this very heavily MAGA north Texas district depends on sounding like it. I don’t fully trust him — he’s too smooth.


  30. Fred says:

    For those who do not know, a House member may say anything without fear of punishment. It is a house “law”. It is supposed to make for more open discussions, but is being abused by the Democrats. So, at this point, the House of Reprehensibles is probably the most out of control branch of the government ever. It is even worse than The Bummer. as impostor president. My reprehensible is Charlie Christ from Florida, and is a most useless tool I could call his office 20 times a day, and he would still vote against my wishes.
    We all know this is BS, We just have to wait it out until the flaming idiocy runs its course. There will be a day of reckoning for the fools in the House of Reprehensibles, and it can not come too soon for me. If you are tired of the charades vote them out.


    • TheOtherSean says:

      It is not a house “law” but the Constitution – members of Congress may NOT be prosecuted for anything said on the floor. Outside, in public, is another matter, but while on the floor they could reveal classified information in public on the floor, speak the most vile calumnies, lie, etc. and there can be no prosecution. A motion of censure, or expulsion from Congress, OTOH, are entirely possible.


  31. HA says:

    The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings.

    John F. Kennedy


  32. molson309 says:

    Pro wrestling and Congress are pretty much the same thing, with the exception that more gets accomplished in pro wrestling.

    A lot of sound and fury – but once the microphones and cameras get turned off they’re all playing for the same team.

    Liked by 1 person

  33. I want Justice. says:

    Evil Adam Schiff is a pathological LIAR and a very crooked and corrupt Democrat. I hope God will punish him and all the evil Democrats for hurting President Trump and his supporters constantly.


    • Lester Smith says:

      Couple of things
      1. Schiff says hidden hearing nessacry to guard against witnesses from copying each other’s statements.
      Why doesn’t anyone sight that dem leaking can be used for witness to copy each other, ha?
      2.second what is Schiff hiding. This needs to be the repeated message. Use dem tactics repeat, repeat, repeat stay on message Schiff is hiding covering up then cherry picking leaks. We’ll isn’t this exactly what schiff claims Republicans would do. Ha
      The dems need to force Schiff to answer what he’s hiding. Republicans need to force the issue.


    • Lester Smith says:

      Couple of things
      1. Schiff says hidden hearing nessacry to guard against witnesses from copying each other’s statements.
      Why doesn’t anyone sight that dem leaking can be used for witness to copy each other, ha?
      2.second what is Schiff hiding. This needs to be the repeated message. Use dem tactics repeat, repeat, repeat stay on message Schiff is hiding covering up then cherry picking leaks. We’ll isn’t this exactly what schiff claims Republicans would do. Ha
      The dems need to force Schiff to answer what he’s hiding. Republicans need to force the issue.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s