If Accurate, The Impeachment Game is Over – Fake Whistleblower Lawyers Now Retreat From Testimonial Appearance…

A report from the Wall Street Journal outlines a request by lawyers for the fake CIA ‘whistleblower’ that ultimately spells doom for the entire phony construct of the impeachment construction by anonymous complaint.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting the anonymous gossipers’ lawyers are now requesting official impeachment testimony by letters not an in-person appearance.  If this is accurate such a request speaks directly to the abject stupidity of the claim:

WASHINGTON—Lawyers for the CIA officer whose whistleblower complaint helped ignite an impeachment inquiry into President Trump have asked Congress whether their client could submit testimony in writing instead of appearing in person, according to people familiar with the matter.

The request reflects concerns about whether the whistleblower could testify to Democrats and Republicans without revealing his identity, and fears that doing so would lead to it being publicly leaked, jeopardizing his personal safety. The intelligence committees haven’t yet responded to the inquiry about potential written testimony, the people said.

Spokeswomen for the House and Senate intelligence committees didn’t respond to requests to comment.  (read more)

It was already ridiculous to think a presidential impeachment, to remove the most powerful elected political representative of The United States, could continue based on an anonymous complaint.  However, expecting the same complainant/accuser to remain invisible during the process is so far beyond nonsensical, the light from where nonsense emanates wouldn’t reach this narrative for a year.

Yes, feel free to pummel the left-wing nuts based on the absurdity of this request.  Only the most raving Moonbat imaginable would think they could impeach a sitting U.S. President via a ‘Dear Sir’ complaint letter to congress.

These are obviously not stable-minded people.

Oh, please, please, please hold that impeachment vote now.  It is more clear than ever where this nuttery is heading.

If you thought it was delicious to watch the media meltdowns on election night 2016, just imagine the meltdowns as the media attempts to sell impeachment via a strongly worded  letter of complaint to their resistance constituents….

Perhaps he could testify via text messages, or… wait, even better,… via tweets.  Too damn funny.

….He hurt muh feelz… impeach forty pies!

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Election 2020, Impeachment, Legislation, media bias, Nancy Pelosi, Occupy Type Moonbats, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

437 Responses to If Accurate, The Impeachment Game is Over – Fake Whistleblower Lawyers Now Retreat From Testimonial Appearance…

  1. Publius2016 says:

    Deep State Think Tank Black Ops problem is that Impeachment is a Constitutional process…they can create Fake News and false narratives but they can’t circumvent US Constitution…

    17th Amendment did as much damage as possible by inoculating Senators from their state legislators…but removing 45 with RINOs and Nevertrumpers will mean Ginsberg II, III, IV etc…

    Even Mittens can’t do that without severe blowback!

    Liked by 2 people

    • sDee says:

      Repeal of the 17th Amendment is crucial to the restoration of the Republic. I use it as an example to those speaking of a Constitutional Convention, of how the American voters are so easily fooled into giving up liberty.

      Liked by 10 people

    • askandgettruth says:

      i am sure glad i have my hip boots on for this s**t show, it is getting real deep in crap


    • fhb says:

      lets march


    • Richard Orberson says:

      They are all a bunch of lunatics that belong in prison or an insane asylum. My preference would be Guantanamo Bay for 90% of them.


    • Zippy says:

      Why is this still “a thing” when the full text of the phone conversation has been released and none of what was claimed by the first “whistleblower” was true. It also doesn’t make any difference when the second “whistleblower” with first hand knowledge pops up as he/she supposedly has.

      What am I missing?


      • The Third Man says:

        One thing I note with some interest are the worldwide bookmaker odds for 2020.
        (BTW: I don’t gamble other than to take a chance on love once in a while)
        POTUS Trump is heavily favored to win, completely out of sync with fake news polls.
        There is actually thoughtful commentary by a few odds makers on their websites.
        Also, odds are heavily against removal due to impeachment.
        Follow the money ?


  2. railer says:

    I know, let’s take the whistleblower’s written statement and have John Dean read it aloud during the impeachment hearings. Dean will confirm the truthiness of it all, and we can safely impeach.

    I shouldn’t even joke about this. The Swamp is subject to actually do this sort of nonsense.

    Liked by 7 people

    • mr.piddles says:

      OMG. I totally forgot that “John Dean Mueller Report Testimony” was an actual thing… and it just happened like a few months ago.

      What a bunch of Assclowns these people are. Seriously. No imagination. Can’t coordinate their stories. Can’t get the point sizes and document attributes right.

      Here’s a thought: if “Administrative State” is an unavoidable consequence of Big Government, which itself appears to be unavoidable for whatever reason… can we at least get one that is not filled to the brim with complete morons?

      Liked by 5 people

    • Somebody says:

      Only if Bernstein is sitting next to him and exclaims “This is worse than Watergate” every time Dean takes a breath 😉


    • Jive Pawnbroker says:

      Add James Taylor playing acoustic guitar in the background and it would be a perfect scene for the Swamp Creatures.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

      Yes jiveP, that would be the virtue signaling cherry on top..


      • ladydawgfan says:

        I just can’t watch that video. I cringe every time I even THINK about it and I was told repeatedly that if I kept making “that” face, it would freeze that way! Who wants to look like a leftist for eternity?


    • Zippy says:

      Why is this still “a thing” when the full text of the phone conversation has been released and none of what was claimed by the first “whistleblower” was true. It also doesn’t make any difference when the second “whistleblower” with first hand knowledge pops up as he/she supposedly has.

      What am I missing?

      Liked by 1 person

      • skaebne says:

        The Dems have already protested that the transcript Trump released is inaccurate. Which means they believe that if they can present testimony from an individual with second-hand knowledge of what was reported to have been said on the call, they can use that testimony to prove further wrongdoing — pressuring Zelensky to investigate Biden, and then altering the transcript to conceal this.


  3. Dantes says:

    This just confirms to me that the “bang, bang” has them scared to death “in the next two weeks”. They are desparate and grasping at straws. Wait, I think they banned straws. They don’t even have straws to grasp at. But they are panicked!

    Liked by 18 people

  4. Sheri Rodgers says:

    As usual they have the MSM whipped into a frenzy. They’re betting the 47% only pay attention to the shock and awe they have created with their fake impeachment.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Jeff says:

      I agree. this was at least one of the goals of this. The MSM will spread the word, regardless how valid, and then once demonstrated to be patently false, drop the story without retraction, or, even continue the fraud…This would have worked against any past Republican (except maybe Reagan and a younger Newt), but thankfully, President Trump hits back, and hard…

      Liked by 3 people

  5. Mark says:

    I don’t think there ever was a real live person as the “whistleblower”. I think the Dems made it all up and thought they could get everything pushed through with the MSM and Deep State’s help. Just a replay of Kavanaugh. I disagree with you, Sundance, in one area. I don’t think the Dems are all that bright. They have a playbook they use and they can’t think outside the box. They really aren’t brilliant strategists.

    Some of the reasons they succeed are:
    1. corruption (which they use to blackmail other people, NSA database access to get blackmail material, etc)
    2. deep state swamp (includes 75-80 % of all gov’t employees as they won’t buck the system)
    3. money (Soros, taking gov’t funds to funnel to friends, etc)
    4. MSM
    5. education system (indoctrination)

    Get their crutches pulled out from them and they don’t know what to do. They aren’t good strategists. You can see them using the same ole, same ole all the time. Basic thug material overlayed with Socialist principles and tactics.

    Everything that’s come to light about corruption is just tip of the iceberg. That’s why the Democrats are scared. There’s a ton of illegal activity in DC that would put them on death row. So, yeah, they toss everything onto the wall and hope something sticks. The problem is that they’re using the same ole, same ole tactics that worked well on greedy, corrupt Repubs in the swamp but this isn’t our father’s swamp anymore. They really don’t know what else to do…

    Liked by 16 people

  6. This is no “whistleblower.” These are people who are lying, and trying to use the rules to conceal their identity as they commit slander, libel, and perjury. These are not people who are revealing “an inconvenient truth” at personal risk to themselves.

    The 6th Amendment declares that anyone who is accused of a crime may confront his or her accuser. Especially when he has already declassified and published the official transcript of the conversation, and when the other party to the call said on-the-record that he was not pressured to do anything. Pure and simply, “there is no ‘here’ here.” Try to do this in an actual court of law and you’d be laughed right out of the courtroom and sent to the bailiff to pay your fine for contempt of court.

    The Democrats are desperate now, trying to have their cake and eat it too. Trying to interpret the law the way they want it to read. Trying to be the Court that the Constitution says they are not. Above all, trying to rid themselves of the one man who can – and will – expose everything.

    Liked by 17 people

  7. Bogeyfree says:

    So if writing letters by hearsay witnesses is now acceptable to pass judgement can you imagine how every court in the land we be??

    All future murder cases, send a letter yep, he did it – Guilty (if conservative or Christian)

    All future rape cases, send a letter, yep he did it – Guilty (if conservative or Christian)

    All future robbery cases, send a letter, yep he did it – Guilty (if conservative or Christian)

    And so on, and so on.

    These people are totally nuts!

    Liked by 5 people

  8. DeWalt says:

    Wonder if the Whistle Blower is named Deedee?

    Liked by 1 person

  9. FishtheDish says:

    The amount of exculpatory evidence is mounting while simultaneously the “whistleblower” position is weakening. I know that impeachment is a political event (not a legal), and that with the MSM they can push narratives – BUT at some point the truth shines through. I mean how do they get around the contrasts between the whistleblower and the actual transcript AND the Ukrainian president twice declaring no quid pro quo?
    The question I have is after the Russian Hoax, and the Stormy Daniels nonsense, then this – it becomes the little boy who cried wolf – will anybody believe it anymore??

    Liked by 2 people

    • richard verney says:

      And Ukraine opened an investigation in February 2019, 5 months prior to the call!

      How can the President interfere by asking the Ukrainians to start an investigation when they already had started that investigation many months earlier.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Dwayne Diesel says:

      Sadly, yes. There are people who believe this because they hate Trump. Why do they hate Trump- because anchors on the Today Show told them too, anchors on MSNBC told them too, CNN anchors told them too and so on.

      My wife is intelligent but falls all over herself trying to defend these lefties (I married into a very liberal family- I cam downstairs one night to see my in laws staring mouths agape watching Maddow….they were buying it).

      So, there are people who buy it over and over. They have to suspend realities but they do.


    • Mr e-man says:

      If you read Sundances analysis of this “impeachment” process. The goal was to taint Trump, go home during recess to gin up support for impeachment and then ram it through a vote before any of the truth comes out.

      Trump blew it up by releasing the transcript. All their fakery and machinations don’t work out against the backdrop of what was actually said on the call and supported by Zelenskyy himself.

      Liked by 1 person

  10. Jim Comey is a weasel_Doug says:

    Next they’ll be giving the bullshitblower Jeffery Epstein’s cell for his own protection!

    Liked by 4 people

  11. BigBlockMill says:

    Anonymous sources say …


  12. I thought the fake snitch was already getting death threats. Fancy that. An anonymous person getting death threats. Go figure.

    Liked by 9 people

  13. What I think happened is that this spy who is friends with Biden heard about the investigation into the Bidens activities in the Ukraine so he talked to Dems and they turned the whole thing around in order to divert attention away from Biden and smear Trump. This is how the Dems work. I am sure the spy freaked out…his buddy was being investigated and who knows how far it would go. Maybe he is implicated.

    Liked by 5 people

  14. dwpender says:

    Sundance — Has anything new about the “WB” altered (or served to confirm) your initial view of his likely identity? I ask because your posts have stopped using his name. I hope no one has threatened you for “outing” a CIA operative (placed in our own White House).


  15. mr.piddles says:

    My votes for Soft Coup Operational Codenames.

    John Brennan: “Kingpin”
    Stephan Halper: “Jumbo Shrimp”
    James Comey: “Redwood”
    James Clapper: “Weak Link”
    Susan Rice: “Stir Fry”
    Joseph Misfud: “il Professore”
    Ukraine Whistleblower: “Deep Goat”
    Alexandra Chalupa: “Burrito”

    Liked by 3 people

  16. FinbarOS says:

    Perhaps if he/she/it testified in a squeaky little Blasey Ford-like voice…..

    Liked by 3 people

  17. Bob says:

    Love the lie the spy is receiving threats. Impossible to be true if no one know who he is.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. milktrader says:

    Judas Goat theory (mostly for fun) :

    The whistle blower works for President Trump and was hired to lead the Deep State to slaughter.

    He is making the Dems shoot all their ammo at shadows.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. joan p calhoun says:

    Oh please dear God make it so.


  20. Michael D Ancell says:

    Will we ever have a Congress that will get things done for the American people? They can’t seem to get their act together at all and it costs taxpayers approximately $2,000,000 in salaries a week to put up with their crap. Here we have one of the best Presidents in a lifetime actually doing what they all should have done before but then we get stuck with whiners who can’t accept the fact he is doing what he said he would do. Most of Congress looks pretty pathetic in comparison and a few have risen to the top. I just hope we don’t lose any more good people because of this circus. We need for these people to start working on solutions to the problems we still face. Infrastructure, Healthcare, Social Security, and Education just to name a few. If we could ever get term limits and a ban on lobbying we would get people that cared about our country and not themselves. Our children’s futures depend on us demanding action now from our Congressmen and not letting this hysteria to continue. I called my Congressman and voiced my concerns about our current situation and the wasting of our taxes. I promised him if he refused to step up and seek remedies for our nation’s problems, he would have another opponent to run against in 2020. The time to resolve our problems is now while we have someone in office who wants to take action, not sit on their butt and pretend they want to help Americans like before. We can’t afford to wait…

    Liked by 1 person

    • annieoakley says:

      We have been ‘working on’ Infrastructure, Healthcare, Social Security and Education all of my life. Everything is worse than ever before. I think we have to RICO the Legislative Branch first. They are raking in billions (like Bidens) for doing nothing.

      Liked by 1 person

  21. spinoneone says:

    There is another very important reason they don’t want this critter testifying in person. It will become blindingly obvious in the first ten minutes or so that s/he did not actually write the “complaint.” That was, in my personal estimation, done by Lawfare and Schiff’s staff.

    Liked by 4 people

  22. The hoax was blown as soon as President Trump released the ACTUAL TRANSCRIPT of the call, along with the Ukrainian President’s confirmation that the call was simply pleasant, with no coercion whatsoever. Yet it continues; so why should this latest outrageous maneuver have any effect upon their insanity? For, despite Sundance’s writing that “not even the most raving Moonbat” would continue the farce, that is EXACTLY what we have been dealing with, the most raving Moonbat CRIMINALS posing as political overseers of “justice for all”. They should all have already been indicted and jailed, for such lies as Schiff’s “parody”, and Pelosi’s blatant statement that he told the truth with it (and I didn’t see any footage of Stephanopoulos telling Pelosi to her face, “you are simply lying, just as Schiff did, about a truth that is obvious to any honest, sane person”.

    Liked by 1 person

  23. Lulu says:

    Oh they are still going through with it. I just saw an article saying the whistle blower will testify via written testimony. Why not? the media will, Democrats, and half the GOP will continue to pretend it’s legitimate.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

      At this point they almost have to proceed with the hoax. They have too much invested in the scheme by now. They won’t back down as this is their last gambit and it looks like they will lose the House next year anyway.

      They know that they can impeach the president and muddy his legacy for any old reason, say just because they don’t like his haircut. “High crimes & misdemeanors” are irrelevant to them; they figure they have nothing to lose.

      Their crooked progressive media overlords will do the heavy lifting and the House democrats will squeak out just enough votes to impeach. Then the Senate trial could be one big ugly drawn out mess.

      ~~~~~~~ TRUMP 2020 ~~~~~~~


    • Matthew LeBlanc says:

      Yes, we will see the old fool globalist farmer comes out preaching to everyone about sacred whisteblower protection hes fought his whole life for or some other preposterous thing an old fool globalist farmer.


  24. Jeff says:

    “These are obviously not stable-minded people.”
    You buried the lead.


  25. Koot Katmando says:

    Not over. I just read two new State department ilk are heading in to testify even though they were told not to. Until the Swamp is help accountable for their crap instead of getting book deals and TV spots on CNN more will just keep coming.


    Liked by 1 person

  26. cheering4america says:

    Can you imagine Jim Jordan questioning the criminal leaker AKA “whistle-blower”?

    “Could you please point out just exactly what caused you to be shaking with fear?”

    “Please tell us EXACTLY what part of this conversation you thought to be ‘crazy’?”

    “So basically you disagreed politically, is that correct? And you felt it appropriate to complain to the INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY IG about the Chief Executive?”

    “To whom have you spoken about this conversation? Who helped you write your complaint? When did you first have contact with Schiff or one of aides? Who else have you spoken to from Congress? You are highly motivated to get rid of President Trump one way or another, aren’t you?”


  27. Will J. says:

    This person doesn’t exist. They never thought it would get this far.

    Morons!!! LOLOLOLOL

    Liked by 2 people

  28. Midnite says:

    “Why continue the Farce?” Because it works! The Dems know that what they’re saying is a lie, but it doesn’t matter because the Press will run the story anyway. All they want are negative headlines shouted from the roof tops of every news media for this news cycle until they can concoct the next outrageous lie. They’re flooding the zone and in the process propagandizing the American people into believing not just that untruth, but the next one as well. This is nothing more than a Psyops program designed to influence voters and plant the seed of doubt in their minds.
    It not only works on the less informed voter it also influences and provides cover for RINO’s in both the congress and senate making it easier for them to abide by the “will of the people”.

    While we may look at these stories as Fake News there are millions of people out there who have no clue about what’s really going on and only know what they know by reading these same false stories.

    It works!

    The reason I know it works is because I spend half of my time on FB countering these false narratives as they are being propagated by my erstwhile “friends” who have now decided that I’m the lowest form of humanity and should be stepped on at every opportunity. What’s happening is no joke my fellow treepers, so while Sundance can call these simply ravings of Moon Bats they are having a profound impact on the psyche of normally rational human beings.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Louisiana Tea Rose says:

      True enough. But bear in mind…the street value of Leftist credibility has gone way, way down since Mueller. Despite their constant barrage of lies, I have no doubt they are negotiating a significantly and increasingly steep snowbank, and nothing they say is going to matter very much when this avalanche starts to move. They will be very, very lucky if anyone hears their crap at all from underneath the onslaught that is coming their way.


  29. Pale rider says:

    I would add to the excitement, the MSM Have been in ‘meltdown mode’ since the election. As a viable investment how do they stay solvent. So I’m guessing there is a stream coming from our government to keep these liars operational.
    Then when you think about that how is this different from any communist country with a propaganda machine pumping this filth into the citizens??
    IMO, closer to the truth is we ‘are’ run by communists and President Trump is dismantling this ruse. It makes more sense then what we are told. How else would there be such an outcry over the Hillary loss. And Obama being crowned into office. Too many now obvious signs we have been duped over the years and I will always go back to the bankers at fault or advocating this mess. They have all to gain. The Siria pullout shows many in the light. Just like Trump said my dad used to say “stay out of the Middle East it’s not a winnable war.”


  30. Wayne Robinson says:

    The demonrats let their mouth overload their ass now they have to back-peddle trying not to be swamped in the sewer sludge they vomited


  31. Joe says:

    The present hysteria is aimed at persuading Republican and Independent voters in congressional districts that Trump carried in 2016 but that now have Demoratic congressmen to not hold it against them when they inevitably are forced by Pelosi to vote for impeachment. The media are in full-throated hue-and-cry mode in support of the goal.

    Those so-called “suburban Republicans,” especially women, who gave the 2018 House of Representatives a Democratic majority, also gave us Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, and would have added Al Gore to the list.

    God have mercy on them. Truly, they have a lot to answer for.


  32. teeheeman says:

    Say it with me crazy Maxine…….”Peach Porty Pies” “Peach Porty Pies”!!!!!!


  33. Bogeyfree says:

    Please Mr. President tonight at the LA rally say something like this…….

    To all the hard working conservative, Christians out there tonight listening please remember this….

    If they can try to frame and destroy me and my family they can and will do it to you, your family and anyone who doesn’t agree with them. This is how they roll.


  34. hokkoda says:

    “Impeachment” isn’t going to be over until President Trump signs an Executive Order FIRING every single political appointee at the CIA and FBI dating back to the Clinton Administration who is not one of his appointees, and then sends a brigade of United States Marines directly into Langley to seize every computer and arrest anybody who gets in their way and shoot anybody who resists.

    This is the SECOND TIME the CIA has executed an operation to overthrow a duly elected government. WTF are people going to wake up and demand heads roll?


    • MikeyParks says:

      You know what will happen then; the Dems will use THAT as an excuse to impeach. Their ignorance of the Constitution and precedent is breathtaking.


    • michael says:

      They just get stronger every time someone challenges them. Marines would make short work at getting evidence. The Marines are the Presidents, they answer to him. The Demos would just wet themselves at the dog whistle.

      Liked by 1 person

  35. Mr e-man says:

    I don’t understand why the whistleleaker spy has to “testify” at all.


    We know what was said. We don’t need someone to tell us what he heard was said. It makes no sense. The only thing that can be asked of the spy is who leaked the info to you (crime), who did you pass that leak onto (crime), and who did you work with to create this false conspiracy narrative (crime). The only thing he can add is why he got it so wrong.

    In fact, in a sane world, (absent not allowing hearsay), he could hear something, bring a complaint, have it checked out internally, find no truth to his claim , be told he heard wrong, and everyone goes back to work without revealing scurrilous rumors and hearsay to the public which unfairly damage reputations.


  36. hokkoda says:

    Look, I don’t want to rain on CTH’s parade here, but this is a paperwork impeachment issued by a Kangaroo Court. They don’t need witnesses. They don’t need evidence. All they need is to write stuff on a sheet of paper, call it “Articles of Impeachment” and then change whatever House rules they need to change in order to send it to the floor of the House of Representatives for a one-time show-vote. Impeachment Managers will be assigned for the Senate Trial

    Don’t believe me? I was watching my LOCAL news this morning and the spent an entire segment harassing Sen. Cory Gardner about why he won’t answer questions pertaining to impeachment. (i.e. is he going to vote to convict/remove Trump?). The media and Democrats already have agreed that their paperwork impeachment is going to happen, so they are now working on flipping US Senators to vote to convict/remove.

    That’s where all this Syria/Kurd/Turkey stuff comes into play…the NeverTrumpers in the Senate are playing to form criticizing Trump, calling him a deserter, to soften up Trump’s support for the eventual trial.

    You people need to wake up and recognize what is being done here. You’re all stuck playing by rules that SIMPLY DO NOT EXIST because we are no longer a representative democracy.


    • Mr e-man says:

      Note they want the verdict before any evidence or defense is presented in a “trial”. Trump has already been convicted, they just need to catch up the paperwork. The new way forward in America under Democrat party mob rule. Guilty until not allowed to be proven innocent.

      Reminds me of issues that go to the Supreme Court. We already know how each Justice will vote based on the politics of the issue itself, before any arguments or evidence is presented.


    • swissik says:

      Thank for saying it much better than I would, although I believe that playing by the rules went astray a long time ago, long before president Trump.


    • Raptors2020 says:


      The term zeitgeist applies now more than ever. Walter Cronkite had a larger audience than the 3 network newscasts put together now. Walter Winchell could ruin an actor or politician with one negative story. The power of the MSM flows now mostly from their monolithism. No dissent exists, because no dissent is tolerated.

      The obvious question, being answered by the marketplace, is why do we need 100 sources for the exact same news and opinions? We don’t. Even the few alternative sources, like Fox TV news, have lemmings trying to hide in the crowd, like Shep Smith. Time is rapidly winnowing them out. The marketplace is merciless, and the stark truth of our black and white alternative is emerging. The politicians like Cory Gardner, who’s first instinct is always to trim and triangulate, can’t change that.


  37. hokkoda says:

    Stop expecting people to “follow the rules”. We are dealing with people who rewrote a House bill for I think it was military housing, deleted all the words and replaced it with the Affordable Care Act just so that they could claim it was a funding billing that had “originated in the House of Representatives”. It was a total perversion of the democratic process so that they could ram through Obamacare. They were able to get away with this not because of democratic processes but because they had the raw political power to do so. Simply put, they had the votes, and they had to push it through in the lame duck before those three new GOP senators (who were elected to stop Obamacare) could show up and vote.

    You think the people who would do that are going to give a rat whether some CIA peon submits a paper testimony? They’re going to write their Articles of Impeachment and push them through the House because they have the power to do so. It will be a show or raw political power.

    CTH makes the incredibly false assumption that there are rules binding the Democrats’ actions. There are NO RULES, and whatever rules there are will simply be changed so that Democrats can do what they want. Period.

    Wake up.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

      No false illusions around here. Fully expect the democrats and their progressive media overlords to push and pass their phony impeachment. Yes, they can impeach for any reason, real or imagined. Still, the Senate GOP know damm well that removing President Trump would be a catastrophic mistake and the planned general Election in 2020 would be the LEAST of their worries.


      • hokkoda says:

        CTH wrote, “Only the most raving Moonbat imaginable would think they could impeach a sitting U.S. President via a ‘Dear Sir’ complaint letter to congress.”

        Yet that is exactly what is going to happen based on everything we now see. The media has already started trying to soften-up GOP senators, calling them cowards for refusing to answer questions about the moonbat impeachment. The GOP Senators, many of whom are either duplicitous like Romney or just squishes, won’t stand up and say something plainly obvious, “This is a phony impeachment, and I’m not going to answer questions about a kangaroo court over there in the House of Representatives.”

        But they don’t. You can already hear the Republicans saying how important impeachment is, and how essential it is to our democracy to respect the process. When, in reality, every GOP Senator should be finding every camera they can find to say loudly and clearly and unmistakably, “This is a kangaroo court. No witnesses. No evidence. A phony whistleblower coached by Democrats using a complaint written by Democrat lawyers. The House can run their rigged show-trial, and we here in the Senate are going to squash it with a ferocity that we hope will shock the Democrats to such a degree that they will never put the nation through such a shameful and absurd miscarriage of justice ever again.”

        But they won’t.

        Liked by 2 people

    • 1987bear says:

      @hokkoda, I’d say you nailed the communist, they make their own laws. Everybody forgets Oidiotcare being illegally pushed thru & AK Sen. Ted Stevens being silenced by FBI/DOJ to make Oidiotcare law. harassment by msm of RINO senators is getting a little too scary for me. I never trusted McConnell either. & Neocon Grahamnesty will do anything for the MIC & continued war.


      • hokkoda says:

        our local fake news network KKTV in Colorado Springs ran some despicable story of Sen. Gardner “refusing to answer” “5 times” about impeachment. The media is complicit in the coup, and they have decided to go all-in.


    • LookUp says:

      No rules is a war.
      Winner takes all and then dictates to he loser.
      But first, you must recognize the hostile takeover.

      Liked by 1 person

  38. Ironclaw says:

    Unfortunately, no, it’s not over. Communists are too stupid for that. They won’t quit until they are vanquished.


  39. tozerbgood8315 says:


  40. doc182 says:

    Until I see someone actually claim to be the “whistleblower”, I don’t believe there is one. This request just strengthens my suspicions.

    Liked by 1 person

  41. Zippy says:

    Why is the still “a thing” when the full text of the phone conversation has been released and none of what was claimed by the first “whistleblower” was true. It also doesn’t make any difference when the second “whistleblower” with first hand knowledge pops up as he/she supposedly has.

    What am I missing?


  42. itsy_bitsy says:

    Pelosi, who along with HER son, personally has her own problems with being involved and paid off by a Ukrainian “”fuel” source (Burisma???), is trying to take Biden’s back and take down Trump with nothing more than hot air.


  43. Barry says:

    Block all websites from ABC, CBS
    NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Washington
    Post, New York Times – loss of
    Advertising revenue with 60%
    people not watching or reading
    News- ratings will drop so will
    online and TV revenue


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s