AAG Whitaker and DHS Secretary Nielsen Present 2018 Election Report…

Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker and Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen announce they have submitted a classified report on foreign influence in the 2018 mid-term election to administration officials: [link]

[…] Throughout the 2018 midterm election cycle, the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security worked closely with federal, state, local, and private sector partners, including all 50 states and more than 1400 local jurisdictions, to support efforts to secure election infrastructure and limit risk posed by foreign interference. Efforts to safeguard the 2020 elections are already underway.

Although the specific conclusions within the joint report must remain classified, the Departments have concluded there is no evidence to date that any identified activities of a foreign government or foreign agent had a material impact on the integrity or security of election infrastructure or political/campaign infrastructure used in the 2018 midterm elections for the United States Congress.  (more)

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Conspiracy ?, Dept Of Justice, DHS, Election 2018. Bookmark the permalink.

111 Responses to AAG Whitaker and DHS Secretary Nielsen Present 2018 Election Report…

  1. Gee….
    timing…or perhaps just has some spare time to kill

    Liked by 3 people

  2. Dances with Wolverines says:

    Now, do the same type of investigation into election fraud.

    Liked by 31 people

  3. thedoc00 says:

    Restating the obvious with respect to activities that have been occurring for the past 100+ years.

    Liked by 7 people

  4. andy says:

    “However, in Alabama, we saw similar activity to that in 2016 by political groups connected to Democrats. But as you recall, the only think illegal the Russians did was fail to register as foreign agents. Those repsonsible for the Alabama effects were Americans and its up to the people to get the word out on that one.” — AAG Whitaker

    Liked by 8 people

  5. Liked by 20 people

    • Akindole says:

      Exactly. That’s the rub in that foreign part.

      Liked by 1 person

      • litlbit2 says:

        What is the difference between Whitaker, Nielsen, Comey, Lynch, McCain? Last name.

        They are all dead to protecting their American Citizens or boss except one. He’s in the box.

        Liked by 3 people

        • Julian says:

          At least Trump has now nominated a bulldog MAGA Patriot named Bill ‘Bobby’s Buddy’ Barr to be AG and destroy the Deep State Swamp.

          Bulldog Bill ‘Bobby’s Buddy’ Barr will come to the rescue!!

          #MAGA

          5B for short.

          Trump is truly playing 5B Chess now.

          Like

          • litlbit2 says:

            I pray you are correct and I am wrong. I have very little belief Barr will be anything more than Session with an extra sixty pounds and slow demeanor. The calming effect Muley et al have beer 🍺 and a cigar in the back room enjoying the A/c. Respect your opinion, hope I am nuts.
            All about MAGA at this point whatever it takes.

            Liked by 2 people

            • Donny Brook says:

              No, that’s a valid concern. He did gush over Mueller a little too much for my taste, but that might just have been an effort to get confirmed. Parse his answers carefully and he is telling the dems he’s going after ALL the rotten players, Feinstein and Hirono figured it out and were visibly upset about it during the confirmation hearing. They know what he was saying. Now, will he actually do that? Your guess is as good as mine, but the guy’s delivery was excellent. He sat there and told them he was coming after them and most of the dems creamed their jeans for him, they couldn’t read the subtext. Doesn’t speak well for their intelligence. After he said he thought it was extremely important for Mueller to finish his investigation he had the hook in them. Once again, parse it carefully, it is a statement that is deliberately crafted to appeal to each side. I’m telling you, the guy is slick, I’d love to know what his intentions are.

              Liked by 1 person

              • litlbit2 says:

                Let’s pray you are correct. I cannot state the joy I would feel if, finally a real American on duty. One law for all. So many previously missed the mark as all chosen seem to come from the swamp. Waiting!

                Like

          • Julian, Barr has been a Deep State Fixer his entire career. He managed Iran-Contra for CIA/Bush ( under alias Robert Johnson), then cleaned it up by managing the pardons when Bush became President. I guess it’s not fair to single out Barr. The job description for AG is to be the Fixer for the President and Deep State. I just hope Trump is inside Barr’s circle of trust.

            Like

            • Donny Brook says:

              Problem is…The longstanding etiquette is that you don’t put other deep state swamp things in prison. You have to shun them to the outside of the circle, then you can pillory them.
              See Scooter Libby, Ollie North, Caspar Weinberger.

              Like

    • franuche says:

      Methinks nobody’s gonna wake anybody up.

      Like

  6. MaineCoon says:

    As Rush said today, Russians only interfere when the Dems lose.

    Liked by 12 people

  7. DeAnna Vaughn says:

    Hell. It’s not foreign interference that is the problem in our elections. It’s the dang Democrats in back rooms filling out blank ballots and stuffing the boxes with the votes of illegals and dead people.

    Liked by 15 people

    • Darrel Smith says:

      Remember the court decision in New Jersey circa ?1981? when the verdict said Republicans could not count ballots, actively recruit voters and anything else involved with elections. This judicial order expired on 12/1/2018, ? believe it was called ‘Cease and Desist’. My files were lost on the computer so this is from memory, but it does exist.The prevention from the Republicans from doing these things prevented openly monitoring election processes. They did it covertly and will be ready for the 2020 election. They now have the data needed for prevention.

      Like

  8. Pale rider says:

    I guess illegals don’t count? Are they domestic? L

    Liked by 10 people

  9. chojun says:

    Excellent! The stage is set for Mueller to serve up a zero calorie nothingburger.

    Liked by 8 people

  10. freepetta says:

    Ummmmm well you guys did a crappy job! The Demonrats stole election after election!!

    Liked by 9 people

  11. lolli says:

    No foreign influence? Like Russian? Lol.
    What about the freakjng foreigners living here? Sharia police in New York.
    Sharia influence all throughout our govt.
    illegals voting
    Dead people voting
    People that stayed home had their votes harvested.
    I just hope their is a part 2 to this story.

    Liked by 9 people

    • De Oppresso Liber says:

      There’s always hope…..sure would be awesome for our elected “leaders” to show the same due diligence concerning our “adversaries” living amongst us, but that would expose the corruption. So what? We already have a Mt. Friggin Everest of irrefutable evidence which cannot be spoken of by anybody with enough clout for it to matter.

      My hope is for President Trump to drop a few “truth nukes” out there tonight, but you know all the networks will have a built-in 30 second delay (at least) to combat that eventuality, and at least delay/postpone anything “unapproved” by the Uniparty for public consumption. Sure, it will eventually get out, but at least they’ll have some chance at “damage control,” or negotiated extortion, whichever label it’s given.

      Liked by 1 person

  12. Scott says:

    Not one word about illegal alien voting, and Obama encouraging it.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Serious question- is there ANYONE of any competency in the Injustice Department or Homeland Security who is watching out for the safety of our Country and protecting us from all enemies, foreign and domestic?

    Liked by 3 people

  14. joeknuckles says:

    Why is it not considered foreign interference when citizens of foreign countries vote in use election?

    Liked by 4 people

  15. I think I saw plenty of foreign interference in 2016 Presidential Election. Videos outside Candidate Trump Rallies showed groups of foreigners waving foreign flags ( green, white and red ) jumping on police cars and beating up innocent rally fans. As far as I remember they did not look like Russians or Chinese. The foreign interference looked Mexican to me.

    Liked by 7 people

    • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

      The crazed protestors at the Albuquerque Rally were especially obvious driving around waving the Mexican flag yelling obscenities en Espanol.

      “Trump no bueno!”

      Liked by 1 person

  16. fanbeav says:

    Whitaker always looks constipated! Probably still under Rosenstein influence!

    Liked by 2 people

    • covfefe999 says:

      There’s no need to insult Whitaker. Trump fired Sessions and put Whitaker in place simply to hold things over until the new AG is confirmed. I think too many people had expectations that Whitaker was going to do some swamp draining. Just the mere fact that Rosenstein no longer has full control of Mueller any more is a great thing.

      Like

  17. JX says:

    Now how about the domestic enemies? DOJ has nothing? Oh that’s right the DOJ is a domestic enemy.

    Liked by 4 people

  18. Redhotrugmama says:

    Citizens (illegals) of other nations voting in our elections does not count. Our entire election process and systems is corrupt.

    Liked by 2 people

  19. TwoLaine says:

    EXCEPT MEXICO.

    Liked by 1 person

  20. Blind no longer says:

    If I’m dumb enough to let something I see on fakebook change my vote without checking it out, then I probably shouldn’t be voting. By the way I’ve never been on fakebook in my life…I get my information from researching and reading sites I trust..like this one!
    I am more concerned with ballots in trunks of cars or box trucks full of ballots that someone finds a day or two after election to change the outcome…like down there in Broward County FL.

    Liked by 3 people

  21. Steven says:

    Ahh! I thought they would discover some widespread frauds by democrats, but no, it’s about the foreigner’s impact on our election.

    Liked by 1 person

    • MelH says:

      Just last week I read that 75,000 illegal votes were found in Texas. Sounds like SOMEBODY cares, but nothing said about correcting it. How does anyone in any State have the right to change the rules and allow illegals to vote? The new rule that needs to be made is that every polling place have a Republican monitor. i ALWAYS volunteer to “serve” in a polling place and NEVER get chosen, nor does any other California Republican

      Like

  22. GB Bari says:

    Unfortunately this is utterly meaningless to tens of millions of voters who watched their votes be negated by rampant Democrat fraud and cheating (AKA “ballott harvesting”) in multiple states over the days following the election. We watched as NO ONE from the Administration stepped in to stop it.

    There is no excuse for ignoring what happened. None.

    I give the Administration a zero (“0”) out of 10 on safeguarding elections. This is NOT what we have come to expect from President Trump’s teams.

    Liked by 4 people

  23. nuwildcat1977 says:

    Post mortems are fine but I want to know what they will do to prevent voter fraud in the NEXT election. It seems many elections were stolen by the Dems, this is unacceptable.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Julian says:

      Trump’s got this.

      All the Democrats who were elected through fraud will be indicted, prosecuted and thrown in jail.

      Trump is the Head of the Executive DOJ/FBI now you know.

      Trump has promised to Drain the Swamp.

      Trust Trump.

      Like

  24. graficgod says:

    they would be much better off safeguarding against democrats taking advantage of ballot/absentee harvesting and the like in 2020. it was such a smashing, corrupt success in the 2018 mid-terms.
    after all- every FakeVote must be counted

    Like

  25. jupitercomm says:

    Only 47 comments? I take that as a challenge to find something to say 🙂

    DHS Sec Nielsen had an unpromising start in the Trump Admin. Anyone remember that time, not too long ago, when (if I recall) many of the hothead self-appointed Vanguards of Trumpism demanded daily that she be sent to the Gulag? I noticed that stopped in December when Trump or sosmeone close to him had the brilliant idea of positioning her as the “Adult in the Room”” as part of the IMO brilliant decision to re-frame the “Wall” as “Border & National Security.” The results were instant. Schumer & Peolosi left the room rather than hear a classified briefing prepared by Nielsen. So for now, I’m glad her star is on the rise

    Also, isn’t this the 1st time Acting AG Whitaker has appeared in public as THE ACTING AG & not “that guy” the media & Dems love to make fun of & treat like a punching bag? & to put hi “onstage” w/ Nielsen after she’s put in serious work is a pretty powerful image of strength inside Trump’s cabinet.

    Ofc, IDK if it was planned that way, but I don’t think it’s a terribly stupid way to look at it

    Liked by 1 person

    • law4lifeblog says:

      Jupiter, discretion apparently isn’t Nielsen’s strong suit, it’s an open secret in DC that her career has been helped along by servicing the married Gen. John Kelly, who fought the President tooth and nail to keep his squeeze in her job. She’s a democrat who does not want a wall, and I was hoping by now she would be gone. By the way, the President is the adult in any room he’s in. Unlike Nielsen, he got where he is standing upright.

      Like

  26. Zaza says:

    Is Kamala Scarus gonna grill Kristjen on reminding her Dept to bend over backward and forward for illegals and dacas?

    Like

  27. Perot Conservative says:

    How about domestic enemies?

    When they found Whitaker, did they locate his testicles?

    Like

  28. Louisiana Tea Rose says:

    To all Legal Eagle Treepers:

    What legal argument to identify and contain voter fraud could be made by a citizen that would have a reasonable chance of success of challenging our corrupt states? I am only asking about elections that would provide for selecting Federal officials.

    Liked by 1 person

    • montanamel says:

      Check into your own State laws/rules (that should be in compliance with the Federal law/rules from the late 1990’s or so)…look at “poll watchers” – who can be one, who can do it…what they can do legally…and, what the poll workers can and can not do around them… I seem to remember that such “registered poll watchers” were a protected class of citizen when it came to being witnesses about polling wrongs, etc… They usually were associated with a candidate or pol party, but I don’t think they “had to be”… Check-6

      Like

  29. Fools Gold says:

    So muh Russia didn’t influence me in 2016 and want in 2020 either…

    Like

  30. Ausonius says:

    Written in the 1920’s by Albert Jay Nock in an essay entitled The Anarchist’s Progress

    The (Grover) Cleveland Administration had long proved what everybody already knew, that there was no essential difference between the Republican and Democratic parties: an election meant merely that one was in office and wished to stay in, and the other was out and wished to get in.

    Liked by 1 person

  31. the5thranchhand says:

    Maybe, just maybe, while Whitaker and Nielsen were going over the records looking for foreign influence in our elections, they ‘accidentally on purpose’, searched for home-grown election fraud.
    Perhaps this was a covert way of getting the information President Trump really wanted, and is being used for his eyes only? Sweet, if so!

    Like

  32. Justin Green says:

    Whitaker doesn’t look like he’s having much fun, lol. At least he’s made more public appearances than Sessions. So there’s that.

    Like

  33. Liberty Forge says:

    I’ve read their report. What am I missing???

    Why the comments regarding apparently what I am missing?

    They are saying — in essence — there was NO Russian collusion with the 2018 election. Nada

    Okay, what about the 2016 Presidential election?

    Liked by 1 person

  34. ugh. just more bs. i’ve lost faith in the system and the people running it. all of them are so used to lying and covering up it’s become the standard. and nobody is fighting against it. sure Judicial Watch is doing yeoman’s work, but they aren’t removing the cancer, just cutting around it.

    why keep it classified if none state actors were found to influence the elections?

    would have been a great time to talk about the fake Russian bots that were hired and deployed against in Alabama and Virginia, right?

    everyone here has covered the Mexican angle – and it’s true. in California we have Mexican government officials in state campaigning… any guesses as to who?

    now we get to watch 14 pre and post rebuttals, all filled with lies, and zero recourse. during the SOTU we get to watch Pelosi in the background sucking her dentures with that sour look. i’m just so sick of all it. if people can’t see what is going on and the road we’re being led down, how in the heck is anyone going to do anything about. California is not far from becoming Venezuela. sad. so very, very sad.

    Like

  35. Ryan Workman says:

    Wouldn’t it be nice if they took REAL illegal alien and dead voter election fraud as seriously as FAKE Russian election meddling!?!?!

    Like

  36. BigBlockMill says:

    They investigated foreign interference?

    IMO, they should have investigated local, state, and party interference into the elections.

    Like

  37. IrishEyesSouth says:

    The issue is not foreign interference; it’s domestic, namely the DS and the Democrats. Yet another waste of time & our money.

    Like

  38. f.fernandez says:

    How about domestic abuses? We need a national voter ID

    Like

  39. Let’s stop chasing the foreign boogyman and get down to looking into domestic interference in our elections.

    Liked by 1 person

  40. deplorable says:

    I mean, it’s not like America’s federal government has ever interfered in other foreign sovereign nation’s elections – right?

    Liked by 1 person

  41. deplorable says:

    Hey DHS/DOJ – did you investigate the possibility of British interference, Christopher Steele, …


    The Washington Times – Monday, May 21, 2018

    Britain’s spy service’s connections to shadowy investigations into Donald Trump have grown stronger with the revelation that academic Stefan Halper was spying on the president’s campaign and doing it on British soil.

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/may/21/stefan-halper-fbi-informant-revelation-underscores/

    Liked by 1 person

  42. Conrad says:

    The answer would be the Brits did so at the behest and co-operation with OUR government. So if we asked them to do so, no foreign interference. (cough, spit)

    Like

  43. Damon Senior says:

    What about domestic interference??

    Like

  44. CM-TX says:

    Gee, there’s a surprise… It’s not.🤨
    They came up empty handed because there was never any credible foreign-threat. Had they wanted to investigate actual influence by foreigners– WITHIN our borders– there was countless cases of fraudulent voting by ILLEGALS. Their first clue, was the former President publicly encouraging it!

    Never mind the original “Voter Fraud Commission” was started by PDJT. Supposedly to investigate all the suspicious activity reported during the 2016 Election. And it had zero to do with foreign countries.

    But the Commission dissolved in failure. The excuse– their time being wasted in court over requests for state voter rolls. So, why bother?!

    The task was passed to DHS. Despite having been caught trying to hack into several state’s voting system (GA was one)– DURING the 2016 election. We couldn’t possibly expect them to incriminate their own agency!

    Nor would DHS expose illegals in any subsequent crimes. Likely having bussed them on arrival, to the very Districts they unlawfully voted in.🙄

    Like

  45. dbdb says:

    Please…. no more talk about boom, boom, boom!
    Repubs in DC work with a limp d!ck!!!

    Like

  46. Clarioncaller says:

    A report on Mitt Romney, George Soros, the Bush & Clinton Crime Cabal, and Lord Mark Malloch-Brown of The Queen’s Privy Council might come to a different conclusion.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s