Sunday Talks – The “Resistance” Narrative Surfaces Within the Democrat Strategy of the Illusion Border Security Negotiations…

Within this segment of Fox News narrative UniParty engineering the evidence of the delay tactic surfacing.   The claim is that a bipartisan congressional group is working on a compromise deal for border security in advance of the February 15th deadline.  However, there is no actual negotiation taking place; merely one-round of low level talks for optics.

The reality is Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer have positioned the appearance of congressional talks (in name only) to give the illusion that some form of negotiation is actually taking place…. it isn’t.  This is a pantomime; a ruse; a Machiavellian fraud.

Cue democrat congressman Henry Cuellar and republican senator John Hoeven:

There is no plan to come to an agreement because that would disrupt the pre-planned resistance narrative that also includes the impeachment plan.  Instead, Pelosi is pushing the border conflict/government shutdown deadline to align with pre-planned public congressional committee testimony that is intended to undermine the White House.

Once you understand that no actual negotiations are taking place; and once you accept that congress (Pelosi/Schumer) have already planned a phase of resistance to undermine the office of the president; things start to make more sense.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2020, Government Shutdown, Legislation, media bias, Nancy Pelosi, Notorious Liars, Occupy Type Moonbats, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

142 Responses to Sunday Talks – The “Resistance” Narrative Surfaces Within the Democrat Strategy of the Illusion Border Security Negotiations…

    • Mark L. says:

      I listened for 8 minutes. Enough

      Liked by 8 people

    • RKEESX says:

      PIGLOSI NEEDS A BASEBALL BAT TO THE HEAD. SHE’S ALREADY NUTZ, THIS WOULD PUT HER OUT TO PASTURE WITH THE OTHER HEIFERS.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Disgusted says:

        You know what I have trouble with? She gets to sit directly behind him about an arm’s length away holding a gavel! Some might say a weapon! She had motivation to swing it.

        Liked by 1 person

        • mr.piddles says:

          Ya know how sometime when Trump is doing a speech or a rally, and he sorta improvises a bit and does some riffing with somebody… He should do that to Pelosi on Tuesday. I imagine it could go something like this:

          “My administration is working hard to resolve the humanitarian crisis at the southern border. And, working together with Democrats and Republicans in Congress, we will be able to do something great. Greater than any administration before us. We will have great success at the border, and it will be very, very special.”
          [Turns to Pelosi]
          “We have a good working relationship, don’t we Nancy?”
          [You can see Trump grinning. Nancy looks uncomfortable, sucks on her teeth, visible fidgeting with the gavel. Trump faces forward again to talk about Nancy in the third person.]
          “Nancy agrees with me. I have a great relationship with Nancy and Chuck. Something very, very special.”
          [Camera tight on Pelosi. Intensified teeth sucking and clenched fists. Pence just off camera to her left, smirky grin on his face.]

          Liked by 3 people

      • Janeka says:

        Heifer, no cow.. heifers are young like occasional cortex cow are old and that is way past usefulness.. As cows go that one is too old to eat and should become dog food

        Like

    • Soldier/Cop/Grunt, Retired says:

      JUST FOR FELLOW LAST REFUGE FANS.

      Dearest Nancy:

      cc: President Trump
      Congressman Gohmert

      RE: Response to your poorly worded survey (You and your crew must assume that all of your supporters are morons, right? Else, why would you send out such a product? I know, you and your crew are also morons, right? Yes, right!)

      Imagine there is little chance you will actually see this in that you live in your own little fantasy world, but just in case here goes.

      For your information, a movement primarily staffed by military/law enforcement community members/veterans is gearing up for a full fledged march on/occupation of Washington, DC. We are coming equipped with an Emergency Constitutional Ordinance (ECO) that is designed to help President Trump rid the federal government of every incompetent/corrupt politician/bureaucrat, and to install a lean/mean/efficient/effective government designed to provide the highest level of protection and service to every American.

      Per our oaths as members/veterans of the armed forces and the law enforcement communities of the United States of America requiring that we protect and serve the American people, we intend to focus on countering the radical policies and philosophies being espoused by the left and their allies in media. Specifically, we will focus on the areas of abortion, immigration, academia/education, infrastructure, energy, economics, term limits, budgeting, lobbying, standards for the media, and assessment of/professionalization of the bureaucracies at every level of government.

      Considering the parameters established by our EOC, the assessment instruments we will employ, and our force of numbers; we are confident that our movement will succeed in righting most of the current wrongs of state.

      For the record: The only action that will deter our movement will be if President Trump requests that we delay our actual march/occupation until he so directs the same.

      Have a nice day,

      Charles Lauderdale
      Soldier/Cop/Grunt, Retired
      PS
      1. Character is to man what carbon is to steel.
      2. A man who trims himself to suit everybody will soon whittle himself away!
      3. An ounce of gold cannot buy an ounce of time.
      4. It is far more difficult to judge oneself than to judge others!

      Liked by 2 people

  1. TarsTarkas says:

    #Revolting

    Liked by 4 people

    • Dee Paul Deje says:

      The deplorables are revolting.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Kenji says:

      Hey Rep. Ceullar!!! It’s called “Eminent Domain” … the Federal Government has the ABSOLUTE right to build the WALL … wherever it is deemed necessary. Period. How did someone as ignorant and uneducated actually get elected!? Oh yeah … heeespanick surname … Mexican ghetto district. Check.

      Liked by 2 people

      • G. Combs says:

        Actually the US government does not NEED to use “Eminent Domain”

        From WIKI
        Roosevelt Reservation. The Roosevelt Reservation is a 60-foot (18 m) strip of land on the United States side of the United States-Mexico Border under the jurisdiction of the United States Federal Government….”

        The easement, established in 1907 by President Theodore Roosevelt to thwart smugglers who wanted to avoid duties on goods, gives the federal government access to the border.
        (Some comment the easement does not go through eastern Texas)

        ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️CHECKOUT! ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
        Border Security for Dummies (This has links to maps and primary docs.)

        […]In effect, the Roosevelt easement provided the federal government with a 60-foot border right-of-way on which it could build the fence.”

        The federal government has the power to construct a fence along the border to protect the United States. In fact, <b.in 2008 DHS Secretary Chertoff issued a waiver "to bypass environmental reviews to speed construction of fencing along the Mexican border."

        (NY Times)[….]

        Liked by 9 people

  2. AmericaFirst says:

    A previous DHS official was recently quoted as saying no fewer than 10,000 kids A YEAR Are trafficked for sex into the United States. Per year. Mind-boggling. (And WE are the immoral ones?)

    I know there have been news reports of people being “saved” from these situations, now I am hoping that President Trump has these victims of trafficking en masse as his guests at the SOTU speech.

    Liked by 7 people

    • Zippy says:

      Just found this channel and subscribed. Language warning:

      Liked by 11 people

      • James Carpenter says:

        A few hairy-azzed wild guesses:
        The speaker is of a minority demographic.
        He’s speaking from his vehicle going into work in the early AM.
        In California (southern, slightly inland)
        He is an escapee from the plantation.
        Dem slave-catchers will concentrate efforts there to neutalize this man.
        Or return him to the plantation.
        A fool’s erand. He ain’t gonna come back and stay back.
        The inflow of “immigrants” either replaces this renegade or Dems can forget plurality much less a majority.

        Liked by 2 people

    • snarkybeach says:

      Anything that doesn’t fit the liberal narrative (poor downtrodden good folk, just looking for a job) is immediately dismissed. MS-13 and other terrorists? … not there… Sex & drug trafficking? prove it… Border cities social services overwhelmed? … America is wealthy enough to shoulder it. Besides they are all refugees…

      Liked by 3 people

    • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

      More than a few young missing persons are abducted inside the USA and sent overseas via the porous southern perimeter. There is illegal smuggling going both ways. That is yet another sad fact the open-borders crowd will never address.

      Liked by 5 people

    • anniefannie says:

      In Nancy’s world, sex trafficking of children is okay but a wall is immoral. Remember she’s also a proponent of infanticide, ethnic cleansing, promoting drugs to kids, open borders, immigration on demand, global alarming, green agenda (aka pouring taxpayers earned green into boondoggles like Solyndra), Medicare for all (but health care for next to none), higher taxes, more unemployment but raise minimum wage for the few who have a job. Heaven forbid (there is a rumor going around that she’s a lapsed Catholic) don’t mention the W word.

      Liked by 3 people

  3. ALEX says:

    Agree. Also hearing rumblings from some GOP Senators that aren’t on board for the Emergency declaration to build the Wall. McConnell and his crew seem more than willing to undermine the President and enjoying the impeachment charade.

    Liked by 5 people

    • The Boss says:

      When it’s time to settle all family business, McConnell will high on the list.

      Liked by 9 people

      • Remington.....it says:

        Well said, boss, well said. With each passing day I find myself edging ever so close to that …line. Point of no return. The illusion of dying in bed is becoming an illusion. I will address whatever comes my way.

        There are many wankers on that list you mentioned.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Zippy says:

      As Tucker Carlson pointed out, National Emergencies are not at all uncommon and have often been called for very minor reasons, so to call one is in no way radical. AND, as recently pointed out in an authoritative analysis and in Congressional testimony, PDJT doesn’t even NEED to call a National Emergency. So, this whole National Emergency garbage is simply another KNOWING obfuscation attempt by both sides of the UniParty.

      Liked by 8 people

    • Zippy says:

      And, BTW, here’s a near zero cost fix even without a wall. Note that the WH ASKS employers to “PRETTY PLEASE E-Verify like we do.” MANDATE IT!!!! The relevant US code assigns that job solely TO THE PRESIDENT!

      Trump Organization to use E-Verify for worker status checks
      30 Jan 2019

      https://www.breitbart.com/news/trump-organization-to-use-e-verify-for-worker-status-checks/

      NEW YORK (AP) — The Trump Organization, responding to claims that some of its workers were in the U.S. illegally, said on Wednesday that it will use the E-Verify electronic system at all of its properties to check employees’ documentation.

      During his presidential campaign, Republican Donald Trump called for all employers to use the federal government online E-Verify system.

      ——–

      8 U.S. Code § 1324a – Unlawful employment of aliens

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1324a

      (1) Presidential monitoring and improvements in system

      (A) Monitoring

      The President shall provide for the monitoring and evaluation of the degree to which the employment verification system established under subsection (b) provides a secure system to determine employment eligibility in the United States and shall examine the suitability of existing Federal and State identification systems for use for this purpose.

      (B) Improvements to establish secure system

      To the extent that the system established under subsection (b) is found not to be a secure system to determine employment eligibility in the United States, the President shall, subject to paragraph (3) and taking into account the results of any demonstration projects conducted under paragraph (4), implement such changes in (including additions to) the requirements of subsection (b) as may be necessary to establish a secure system to determine employment eligibility in the United States.

      ——–

      Immigration Reform: The Real Issue

      http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=234919

      “100% E-Verify, under criminal felony penalty for failures to do so and business seizure for a second offense. No exceptions. This is trivially enforceable; employers already have to file 941s to report withholding taxes. Add one field for each employee that must contain the E-Verify control number on each report. Change the law so that non-reporting or false reporting on a 941 is a felony criminal offense with a statutory penalty of $5,000 per employee, per month not reported or falsified and that all directors, officers and employees involved in producing said false report are subject to a year in prison, consecutively, for each employee not reported. This instantly ends employment capability for illegal invaders.”

      Liked by 8 people

      • Zippy says:

        Of course, this is not mandated because it would nearly overnight:

        1. Quickly give a good count of how many tens of millions of illegals are working in the US.
        2. Destroy a cheap labor resource of employees who don’t dare complain about working conditions while their supplemental support like food, medical care, and (Spanish language) education is paid for by taxpayers.
        3. Result in some self-deportations.

        So, there’s an easy near zero cost fix, but no one is pushing it. That should tell you all you need to know about the UniParty’s sincerity about actually fixing the problem.

        Liked by 8 people

      • mimbler says:

        Seems like we don’t even need to change the law.
        Just enforce existing penalties against employers for hiring illegals (rarely done), and they will -all- use E-verify voluntarily to avoid fines and prison.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Ken Lawson says:

      I posted a comment on another thread that included an article about McConnell and that he’d told the president that he had a majority of senators who would stand against an emergency declaration. That should be no surprise to any of us. We know the UniParty does not want the president to succeed. The GOPe, which are part of the UniParty and they also control the Legislative Branch are not our friends. We should already be bringing forward candidates to primary them in 2020. Waiting until next year will be too late.

      Liked by 3 people

      • nuthinmuffin says:

        how do you stand against an executive order of a national emergency? can’t the president ignore the lower courts because of the threat to our border?

        Liked by 3 people

      • ristvan says:

        Which just shows how the ‘national emergency’ declaration is living in Uniparty heads.
        As posted previously in detail, a national emergency for border wall invites lawfare: overrule by passage of joint resolution per NEA, challengable emergency grounds, very problematic resulting application of 10USC2808. What everybody in the Uniparty hopes PDJT will do because woild be a losing mistake. He has been goading them for months now on this. And PDJT knows better, Sun Tzu stuff. Appear weakmwhen strong, appear far when near.
        The easy, clean, lawfare proof Sun Tzu strike is 10USC284. DHS requests DoD assistance under §284(b)7. The supposed §284 ‘problem’ identified by the recent Congressional Research Service analysis actually isn’t. It is a big plus. Legal Logic: Anyplace illegal alliens are regularly entering is also a place ‘mules can bring in illegal drugs like heroin and fentanyl (but not marijuana—too bulky), and where transnational criminal organizations can enter. QED. The exact §284(b)7 definition.

        Like

      • TPW says:

        let them stand all they want…..shows who they are…..it is up to him……

        Like

    • Tl Howard says:

      Let him know you know his game and the Chamber’s game and that you consider them one and the same with the Dems.

      Like

    • Dee says:

      The Senate will vote to impeach, the Turtle must make sure he is gone.

      Like

    • GB Bari says:

      10 USC 284 is not a “national emergency” law. POTUS will use that to build the Wall / Barrier / Fence / Vertical slats / Whatever. POTUS has full authority, it does not require declaring any “national emergency.” The legitimate use of that code will be to counter drug smuggling and transnational organized crime (human trafficking).

      http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section284&num=0&edition=prelim

      Liked by 1 person

  4. The Boss says:

    President Trump knows full well that no serious negotiations are taking place, and he wasn’t bashful about saying so this past week. Of course thanks to Herr Dr Mengele-Northam’s utterances about killing live babies, the president’s remarks were overshadowed.

    Liked by 5 people

    • ristvan says:

      My guess is he might well point that out in the SOTU. Then turn to Pelosi and say, “you said no negotiation until shutdown ends. So I took the heat (from those concerned about the national security and humanitarian crisis at our southern border) for ending it. And there still aren’t any good faith negotiations.. You dissembled for politics, and you have exactly 10 more days to fix the situation before I act unilaterally under the powers already vested in me by Congress to secure the border from illegal drug trafficking and transnational criminal organizations like MS13.” Boom!

      Liked by 2 people

  5. cantcforest says:

    When Pelosi and the dimms were vacationing (and attempting to vacation) while President Trump was in the WH waiting to negotiate on the border security, it became pretty obvious they were dug in and waiting for impeachment to crank up.
    Maybe PDJT will just go ahead with building the wall and see where the media goes with that. I don’t see a court stopping him. I’m just curious on which approach he puts out front.

    Liked by 2 people

    • bakocarl says:

      I think, as PTrump has said a number of times, the wall is being built. He said just yesterday or the day before that we are approaching 150 miles of newly installed wall, and he is about to let 2 or 3 additional very large contracts for more sections of wall.

      Personally, I’d like to see most of the 37,000 members of the Army Corps of Engineers primarily engaged in wall erection, with a sufficient number of civilian contractors involved to manufacture the sections, and transport them to preplanned locations along the border. Civilian contractors can also be engaged to haul in loads of concrete to backfill the trenches, or even grade the final wall, as necessary . . . though that’s easily done by the Army. And the Army, again, stringing coils of concertina wire, as required, on and around the wall.

      Let’s get thousands more involved!!!

      Liked by 4 people

      • bakocarl says:

        115 miles, not 150 miles.

        Like

      • Zippy says:

        Congressional Research Service: President Can Build Border Wall Without National Emergency or Additional Action by Congress
        31 Jan 2019

        https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/31/congressional-research-service-president-can-build-border-wall-without-national-emergency-or-additional-action-by-congress/

        ———-

        Defense Official: Nothing Stopping Trump from Authorizing Military to Build Border Wall
        29 Jan 2019

        https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/29/watch-defense-official-nothing-stopping-trump-from-authorizing-military-to-build-border-wall/

        During a House Armed Services Committee hearing on Tuesday, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy John Rood confirmed to Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL) that Trump does not need Congress or a national emergency declaration to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.

        The exchange went as follows:

        BROOKS: I want to direct your attention to 10 United States Code § 284 which authorizes President Trump to deploy the United States military to the southern border to build fences and to do a lot of other things, and for clarity, if you look it up in the dictionary the word fence includes the word barrier and the word barrier includes walls made of a wide variety of different materials.

        So that having been said, it seems to me that 10 U.S. Code § 284 can be used by the President of the United States to direct the United States military to build a wall. Now as of today, you’ve mentioned military forces along the southern border, have any of them been deployed pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 284?

        ROOD: Congressman, I don’t believe any of our forces have been deployed pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 284. You are correct, however, that that use of authority would authorize the secretary of defense to erect barriers, roads, fencing, those types of materials to disrupt drug smuggling.

        BROOKS: Does 10 U.S.C. § 284 as you understand it, require the declaration of a national emergency before it is implemented?

        ROOD: No.

        BROOKS: It does not?

        ROOD: No.

        BROOKS: Has President Trump, to your knowledge, ever used 10 U.S.C § 284 to direct the military to build the wall that is necessary for border security?

        ROOD: No, not to my knowledge, Congressman.

        BROOKS: If President Trump were to direct the Pentagon and the United States military pursuant to 10 U.S.C § 284 to build such barriers as are necessary to secure our southern border from drug trafficking and international crime cartels would the United States military obey that order?

        ROOD: If we judge it to be a lawful order, yes sir. And I assume it would be.

        Liked by 3 people

        • Zaza says:

          “BROOKS: Has President Trump, to your knowledge, ever used 10 U.S.C § 284 to direct the military to build the wall that is necessary for border security?”

          should have been followed with “Does the PoTUS know 10 U.S.C § 284 exists?”

          Like

          • Zippy says:

            I’d bet he doesn’t considering the swamp scum he’s surrounded himself with. He supposedly watches Fox, but I wonder if that Congressional Research Service report has ever been mentioned there, let alone the CONgressional testimony.

            Like

            • Ken Lawson says:

              I’ll bet he does. But with all the good ideas upthread, the fact is that no matter what method he chooses, even if he has the full legal right to do it, there is no doubt the left will bring suit to stop him. Sure, they may have no right to file suit in some circumstances and it may get thrown out of court, but they will use anything they can to delay until they have impeachment in process. Then they will challenge in court that he doesn’t have authority because he’s under the shadow of impeachment. And, while none of that may hold up if it ever gets to SCOTUS, it still causes and delays and doubts, which is enough for the left to pursue it.

              And don’t forget, for all the work the left will do out in the open, you can bet the GOPe is working hard behind the scenes trying to help them. They don’t want President Trump to succeed (or even to remain in office) if they can stop him. The Democrats and GOPe all serve the same masters.

              Liked by 3 people

              • ristvan says:

                Lurking Lawyer here.
                Ken, yes they may try. But last week on a different post I provided a longer yet still simple clear set of reasons they would likely not even try, even in 9th circuit nutter Hawaii:
                1. §284 is simple, clear, and was most recently reaffirmed in 2016 under Obama.
                2. No ‘sphuman rights’ issues are involved, unlike colorably in the Muslim travel ban where SCOTUS ended up supporting PDJT because the Congress passed INA POTUS exception is clear on national security grounds despite any such other concerns.
                3. The only ‘plaintiffs with standing’ would be Mexican drug cartels and transnational criminal gangs like MS13. NOT congress critters. NOT NGO bleeding hearts on behalf of illegal aliens. Rather bad optics if some nutter 9th circuit judge ruled otherwise.

                Liked by 3 people

      • “transport them (wall section)to preplanned locations along the border..” Good point in that anyone familiar with the privacy/sound barrier walls that go for miles along our interstates understands this. These partitions of concrete are manufactured far from where they are eventually erected. Hundreds of miles of our border wall can and may be manufactured far from the border. Our Mexican Border Wall/Barrier could actually be constructed in plants as far away as Minnesota or Illinois, then shipped and erected. Easy peasy…no erection disfunction!

        Liked by 5 people

      • snixy says:

        you don’t want the Army Corp of Engineers to build it – they built our Katrina Levees that broke because the idiots used SAND and River SILT to build it.

        Like

  6. MAGAbear says:

    Just have the Army Corps of Engineers begin construction of the wall. No emergency or congressional approval needed. Should’ve done that two years ago to be honest.

    Liked by 1 person

    • The Boss says:

      And people wonder why the DoD was funded for two years? Wonder no more. And no bills of attainder of liberal judge will be able to stop what’s coming.

      Liked by 2 people

    • ristvan says:

      Magabear. Think about the optics and the 2020 election. Yes, PDJT could have invoked 10USC284 earlier. But this way, he is not only building prefabbed steel slat/anticlimb plate wall as we blog, he is simultaneously painting the Uniparty into a self destruct ‘no wall, no national emergency’ corner from which they cannot escape and thatnwill deatroy them in the 2020 election. He owns this particular chess game. Checkmate Feb. 16.

      Liked by 2 people

  7. tonyE says:

    Isn’t there a Praetorian Guard in the US Congress?

    They came very handy some times… like with getting rid of people.

    Like

  8. Mark McQueen says:

    “They” are looking to incorporate the National Emergency declaration, if it comes, into the impeachment angle.

    Liked by 1 person

    • James Carpenter says:

      It won’t matter what screed the Uniparty throws into “articles of impeachemnt”. Everybody knows Trump has not committed any “high crimes” (although indignant posturing as though he has is quite the fashion among virtue-signalers). Pretend something is a fact, repeat/rinse, repeat/rinse and a mob is consolidated and driven to frenzy.
      What will matter is how blatant the Uniparty’s efforts are in attempting to rid themselves of an existential threat.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Mark McQueen says:

        It really depends on what Congress considers an impeachable offense. Criminality is not a prerequisite.

        Like

        • ristvan says:

          MM, beg to differ strongly. Constitution A2§4 is quite explicit: Treason (nope, no Russian collusion), bribery (nope), or other HIgh Crimes (none, winning the 2016 electoral college is not a crime) or Misdemeanors (ditto none—no obstruction, no perjury, no official misstatements to congress…).
          This Lurking Lawyer differs on this impeachment point with Sundance. Despite Mad Maxine’s “peach foty fi” rants, Pelosi and Schumer know it would destroy permanently the remenents of the Dem party already being trashed by Bernie and AOC and Tlaib and Omar and Sparticus and… So in my opinion they wont allow it. TDS has limits to those in power lest they lose that power, albeit not to those who are not.

          Liked by 2 people

          • Mark McQueen says:

            I’m not sure they’ll allow it either. However, impeachment is a political process not criminal. There is no Judicial oversight. The Court cannot intervene nor can it overturn a conviction. The term High Crimes and Misdemeanors has it’s own history and should be viewed in the context of the times it was included in the Constitution. They are higher standards for persons of High Office and they are not well defined.

            Like

    • Zippy says:

      He doesn’t even NEED to declare a National Emergency to have the DOD build the wall AND if they try that BS angle we can provide a LONG list of “National Emergencies” that have previous been ABUSED in recent history for some pretty minor, stupid reasons. So, they can forget THAT angle.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Zaza says:

      I bet the PoTUS would tell you in private that he feels rather silly now for ever trusting the weasels like cryin Ryan and McTurtle..

      Liked by 2 people

      • Zippy says:

        Next, he should get rid of Jared and Miller. I hope for many reasons he gets a second term not the least of which is that then through past experience and a lack of next election consequences from UniParty/Swamp retaliation he could weed out more swamp scum advisers from his WH.

        Liked by 1 person

        • law4lifeblog says:

          Zippy, Javanka needs to go, but Stephen Miller is the best the President has. Why trash him?

          Liked by 1 person

        • GB Bari says:

          IMO you are overestimating the amount and scope of influence that Jared or Ivanka have on the President’s formation of policy and implementation strategy.

          Please keep reminding yourselves that THIS President does not formulate most policy based solely on the word of any single advisor. He deliberately surrounds himself with people whose knowledge he respects, but who collectively have disparate opinions on the subject topic. PDJT wants ALL sides of every policy represented so he hears the pro/con arguments from every perspective. Ivanka and Jared are but two points of view (and only on some topics) that are presented for consideration along with many others.

          POTUS then decides on a forward policy based on what he believes to be the best-supported arguments mixed with his own lengthy experience. As a successful CEO, his approach is IMO far more objective than many seem to give him credit for doing.

          Like

      • Mark McQueen says:

        Not sure what I’d bet on other than POTUS is nothing like his opponents want to portray him.

        Like

      • cantcforest says:

        I think he recognized that MSM was misinforming the voters as to the seriousness of the open border. He has hammered away at getting the truth out for the border situation and the witch hunt and is now prepared to do battle, even though the libs, MSM, deep state, and most of the GOP are working against the reasons he was elected.

        Like

      • cantcforest says:

        I think he recognized that MSM was misinforming the voters as to the seriousness of the open border. He has hammered away at getting the truth out for the border situation and the witch hunt and is now prepared to do battle, even though the libs, MSM, deep state, and most of the GOP are working against the reasons he was elected.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Pied Piper says:

        Zaza… 100% agree.

        Like

      • I’m not sure he ever did. I believe he was letting them demonstrate who they were, taking the high ground so in the end he would be able to act with Americans realizing he had no choice in view of the lack of cooperation.

        Like

  9. There are a lot of convergences’s during all of these time periods… including Graham’s demand of WRAY, along with another government shutdown, and the SOTU. It looks like the cards are going to be played in turn… we shall see… but if anyone thinks that TRUMP is not fully prepared and doesn’t know what is happening… well then he has you exactly where he wants you… WEAK when you are strong and STRONG when you are weak… Trump looks awfully weak now, politicians who negotiate using threats and graft are at a HUGE disadvantage when there is a businessman who has the advantage of understanding what is going on as well as having been sober for the last 30 years while drunk demonrats were blabbing everything trying to get into his wallet.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. Monticello says:

    Can’t watch Wallace…..is there a transcript?

    Liked by 2 people

  11. TwoLaine says:

    F & F this AM had on a Democratic Congressman a-h013 who was very rude to Pete Hegseth who apparently drew the short straw in interviewing him. He made me want to puke. He just kept spouting the same old tired sh1t they’ve all been spouting forever.

    We don’t need a wall from sea to shining sea, blah, blah, blah. Most of the drugs go through ports, blah, blah, blah. These morons spout the same OLD things over and over and over, when the President has been very clear about what is needed and where. It’s like a time warp. I had had enough and turned it off period. So much nicer.

    Liked by 1 person

    • anniefannie says:

      These babies go in every morning and suck off Nancy’s teat of Acceptable Talking Point of the Day. There isn’t an original thought in the Congressional Democrat canal outside Nancy. Even Chucky goes to her to get his marching orders. What a crowd of wimps!

      Liked by 1 person

      • TwoLaine says:

        I agree.

        They also had a so-called R strategist on too, some new guy who was horrid. He said the President should NOT toot his horn at the SOTU. Ridiculous! Where else are the American people going to hear the truth? Where do they get all these 2-bit hacks?

        Liked by 1 person

    • TPW says:

      Why doesn’t just one of them …..how do they know what and how much comes through the borders that are not check points.

      Liked by 1 person

      • TwoLaine says:

        I think they should all pitch tents on the unprotected borders and have their meetings there. They are all way too comfy working in the swamp.

        Like

  12. Publius2016 says:

    “everyone has a plan…until they punched in the face” Mike Tyson

    Liked by 4 people

  13. freepetta says:

    Declare a national security emergency. The Demonrats have no intention of building a wall for us. Only for themselves and other countries!!

    Liked by 2 people

  14. Sandra-VA says:

    Maybe someone should do an investigation into sources of money for Cuellar… wouldn’t surprise me if he has some kind of backing from cartels. For him to sit there and say NO to a wall is disgusting! His excuses make no sense. In addition, this is not just a LOCAL issue as he tries to desperately argue… not having a secure border affects the entire USA.

    That said, does President Trump know that he can build the wall without declaring a National Emergency? Didn’t Rep Brooks give the answer to how to get the military to build it using the drug trafficking reasoning?

    Liked by 3 people

    • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

      If content to wait for the socialist democrats in the House to appropriate funding for the wall it will not get built any time soon. Let the Corps of Engineers and the Seabees and other outfits carry out the task and take the money confiscated from the drug cartels to pay for it.

      http://www.illegalaliencrimereport.com/opioid-crisis-illegal-aliens-busted-with-18-pounds-of-meth-in-arizona/

      “PINAL COUNTY, AZ (CBS5) – Two women have been arrested after a traffic stop near Casa Grande ended in a major meth bust. Deputies seized $48,000 worth of methamphetamine during the stop on Thursday. According to the Pinal County Sheriff’s Office, the driver, 31-year-old Martha Rabago Ibarra, and passenger, 43-year-old Maria Franco Alvarez, were charged with transportation of dangerous drugs for sale and possession of dangerous drugs for sale.

      Officials say both women are Mexican nationals.” ~ from the story above by IACR

      Liked by 2 people

    • Zoe says:

      Not only that he said that it was not Washing DC who should decide on what security measures are taken at the border. He must be in the same civics class with AOC.

      Liked by 1 person

    • TPW says:

      Isn’t it funny how these stupid answers by Democrats go unchallenged when being interviewed on FOX….

      Liked by 1 person

  15. Zaza says:

    ” The claim is that a bipartisan congressional group is working on a compromise deal for border security in advance of the February 15th deadline. However, there is no actual negotiation taking place; merely one-round of low level talks for optics.”

    Seems on the up and up, the same people who gave us the Dept of Homeland Insecurity are responsible for more pork barrel spending on security that provides no actual border security and cost billions to taxpayers. Why would they give up on such a lucrative boondoggle now when it has worked so well for so long.

    Liked by 2 people

  16. Bogeyfree says:

    It’s time to hit Americans with the horror and disgusting reality of child trafficking that the left doesnt seem to care about. PT and R’s need to release a steady flow videos and testimonials examples by those who have suffered due to the left’s lack of caring and action.

    Talk is cheap and quickly forgotten, show images (faces covered of course because they are minors) but show the visual horror of it all and while your at it show the images of adults & families destroyed by the drugs that continue to flow across our sourthern border.

    PT needs to bring this war into Americans home with images that can’t forget IMO.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Ken Lawson says:

      I agree with you, but remember that POTUS only has a limited ability to get those images to people. The media most likely wouldn’t publish or broadcast them and most Americans don’t read or watch conservative media or even use social media. So, the number of people he can get those images to is limited. That’s not to say he shouldn’t do it, but we have to remember that, at best, it would have limited impact. This really boils down to deplorables educating fellow citizens and bringing them over to our side. No one else will or can do it.

      Liked by 1 person

      • anniefannie says:

        The “Humanitarian” party has shown time and again that they only give a damn about any oppressed or wronged group as long as they’re useful. When they are no longer useful, they are thrown on the scrap heap. Similarly, how do you think they came up with Northam’s picture so quickly? They had it all along. It wasn’t useful during the primaries, especially since Northam was able to portray Gillespie as the racist. Once Northam made the egregious mistake of giving details of what happens in these after-term abortions, he became expendable so they played the race card on one of their own. Imagine that!!

        Like

  17. CM-TX says:

    The idea that we should not be concerned when an unknown foreign person crosses our borders, to then immerse themselves within our communities, while having no idea their true intention– is pure idiocy!

    In fact, other countries take extreme measures to recitify when just the possibility of such a person exists.

    (Like in Switzerland, for example…)
    When there’s reason to believe there might be an illegal alien in their midst… one town (just outside of major city) doesn’t mess around. Based off just a rumor re., they send Police to all their local hotels. They then go about verifying each guest’s identity/status, & do so by going door-to-door.

    But if you didn’t know this custom initially, you might not answer the knock at first… b/c it’s late at night– & you’re in a foreign country … and some stranger’s voice keeps insisting that you ‘Open up!’ the door … So you ask: “Why?” > they say: ‘It’s for your safety!’ > having serious doubts, you then reply: “Hell no!” … also there’s no peepholes, so no way for you to see who’s on the other side.

    Your hesitation results in whoever starting to force their way in … thinking this can’t be a good thing, you contemplate jumping off the balcony … but the possible outcomes of doing so aren’t good either, so you quickly reconsider … you try to stall them by warning that you’re “calling the police!” Then realize you’ve no idea the # … the maybe-intruder counters this by saying: ‘We ARE the police!’ … but you’re not sure you believe them, since they never claimed to be until now!

    During the heated exchange, you sent a text alerting the manager (at his home, down the street) … fortunately, he shows up to assess the confusion … a short time later, he calls & informs you that it’s indeed safe to open the door!

    So you do … sure enough, 4 officers (dressed in SWAT-Gear) are standing there to greet you … they ask to see your papers, and you comply … you apologize profusely for being a pain in the arse, while trying to explain the American culture of distrust … this only seems to confuse them, but satisfied with their purpose– they hand you back your passport .… preparing to walk away, they part by saying: ‘Welcome to Switzerland, do enjoy your stay!’😕

    [True story– this was hub’s recent experience. He’s there for an extended stay on business, & this was on day 2!] 😁

    Not sure if they ever found their guy. But supposedly they checked all 11 guests in the one hotel, plus all others elsewhere!

    Liked by 1 person

  18. Daniel says:

    I’ve decided I’m not going to live in a house any longer. Apparently, walls don’t work and this is just a death trap I’m living in. Who’s with me?

    Liked by 1 person

    • GB Bari says:

      Oh you can have walls, but no locks on any windows or doors. Whoever wants to come in, can come in unimpeded.

      Yeah, right. When pigs fly. Or when B. Hussein O., Pelosi, Mad Maxine, McConnell and all of the rest of the Swamp-o-crats remove the property barriers (walls, fences, etc.) and unlock all doors and windows in their mansions.

      Like

  19. Tl Howard says:

    McConnell playing tough now, saying he and GOP could stop the emergency declaration. We HAVE to revolt and claim him as our target.

    Like

  20. USA First! says:

    Today I salute President Trump, again.
    He has singlehandedly allowed this situation to play out for his re-election. The libtards are so focused on stopping him they put all their chips in on a losing hand. Trump holds all the right cards, period! Trump has said way to much to turn back now. He is committed.

    The wall is coming!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Tl Howard says:

      So, you don’t think McConnell stops him? I wish I had your confidence right now. I think Turtle has him boxed in and the globalists Dems knew the globalist GOP would play that last card about the “emergency.” If Cassius doesn’t get him, Brutus will.

      Like

      • USA First! says:

        McTurtle definitely does not have President Trump boxed in. It’s very simple,President Trump has the authority to build the wall even without declaring a national emergency. That is fact. The media has done their best to hide that fact from the people. President Trump can also declare a national emergency and build the wall. Either way he has the authority and he will use it.

        This is his hour and he knows it. This is also our hour and we know it. The wall is not just coming, it’s already being built.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Tl Howard says:

          I certainly hope so–just order the Army Corps of Engineers to the Border. They maintain the levees in my neck of the Bay Area, why not the border?

          Like

  21. Tl Howard says:

    No POTUS tweets today about the Wall.

    Like

  22. azchick says:

    I live in Southern AZ and I’m assuming everyone that is against building the wall is being funneled $$$ by the Cartel. They pretty much own this part of the country. The Border Patrol agents I know LOVE PDJT. I gave food and $$ to agents during the shut down. They are grateful for our support. Keep it up.

    Liked by 3 people

  23. Facts says:

    If the Dems really want open borders, then it means the entire Red Chinese Army (for example) could enter without the slightest resistance. Indeed, the Dems would house and feed them. That is what open borders means, if you think about it.

    Like

  24. ForGodandCountry says:

    I appreciate that Sundance is so clear and certain he knows what the democrat/UniParty plan is. That said…

    It sure would be nice to know what President Trump’s plans are to counter all of it, presented with the same clarity and certainty.

    Like

    • ForGodandCountry says:

      PS – I should have stated that I believe Sundance is spot on target regarding Democrats intentions and plans.

      Like

    • Sentient says:

      The president should just nuke D.C.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Bill says:

      We know POTUS has all the Trump cards in his hand. And he is NOT showing them off!
      There is a lot of bluffing and scheming going on, but the time is fast approaching that these closely held cards will get played at the proper time. Yes we can speculate on what his plan might be, but remember the enemy is lurking here too, looking for clues for the next move.

      Our President has this, just sit back and watch how this unfolds. Our Lion is getting tired of the jackals circling for the kill and sooner or later he will make his move. Most likely something completely unexpected and sends the wounded fleeing!

      Winnamins to Winfinity

      Liked by 1 person

    • GB Bari says:

      Sundance is reading and interpreting the signals that the Deep State / Dems / media are proving in their daily public record (the eneMedia). IMO Sundance has them pretty well-measured.

      Whereas PDJT is far less public about many of his real strategies and timing plans. He has many options in any given situation so its often more difficult to predict with certainty.

      Like

  25. rustybritches says:

    the longer the President goes with out doing any thing the more the Gutless Republicans will do all they can to help bring him down along with the rest of the traitor dems sorry but I wish he would say at the SOTU that he is going to build the wall and has already given the go ahead to the Military and right today he should be doing recess appt while the congress is all out until Tuesday
    He owes Mc Connell nothing and I would now take one step further and fire McConnell wife..
    No need for her to be around to talk to mcconnell behind the presidents back..

    Like

    • montanamel says:

      Takes a certain number of days, before he can do that…
      The turtle makes sure that it never happens!
      We need to march on DC soonest…and, stay.

      Like

  26. Disgusted says:

    Why waste our time? Since we make it clear here we never choose to sit in front of televisions on Sunday mornings to listen to this garbage, why constantly push them on us HERE? Same complaint about so many comments based on Twitter. Many like me decided long ago not to get involved with Twitter, hashtags and all, so since you all who care to learn how to decifer comments based on someone’s (even the great ones like President Trump and James Woods) tweets, can’t you share somehow, some way eliminating the sign language always included like # and @, all of which do not clarify the information you are good enough to be trying to share! 🤷🏻‍♂️

    Like

  27. Remington.....it says:

    Perhaps he will, rusty. He’s REALLY good at doing the unexpected. Remember his dinner in Fl., when over dessert, he told Xi……BTW, we just launched a bazillion cruise missiles into Syria….FYI.

    Liked by 1 person

    • czarowniczy says:

      Yeah, and one of the Navy personnel killed in that ISIS car bomb in Syria shouldn’t have even been there.
      She was working with a an NSA crypto team instead of where she should have been – in a post grad psychology program she’d been accepted in. She was looking at orders for both when the Navy, unstated but presumably under pressure from the NSA, cancelled her orders to the post grad program because years before she’d had thyroid cancer. She was cured, found fit for continued active duty, found fit for deployment to an active combat zone but not fit to attend a PhD program.

      What makes me think that it was pressure from her NSA posting is that if the Navy wanted to cancel her program and deploy her it would have just said:”GO!”. Instead the Navy invoked an arcane and hardly ever used regulation to cancel her school, a regulation whose use in this case is sketchy at best. This sounds to me like the heat was poured onto BUPERS and they dredged up this reg as a way of signaling compliance under pressure.

      Like

  28. So “the local people get to decide what type of border barriers should be done not Washington” Rep Cuellar, REALLY? The Federal Government decides what is best to defend the country, not the citizens who live in the community. First and foremost, the Border Patrol Agents get to have a say in what THEY need and recommend to best protect from invasion of illegal aliens and drugs. The Border Patrol gives guidance on what is proper and effective to protect the border and the lives of Border Patrol Agents, not the communities. THAT IS THE PROBLEM. Dems think that they know best and are going to get what they dictate. This time, they are NOT.

    Like

    • czarowniczy says:

      Why not let the illegals and the spawn of illegals residing in the border communities decide if the border should be secured. while we’re at it let’s let the thugs, drug slingers and other assorted criminals in the innercity have a heavy say in how laws are enforced?

      Uhhh…wait a minute…they already are? Never mind.

      Liked by 1 person

    • czarowniczy says:

      BTW, they sure as hell didn’t talk to the farmers and ranchers along the border, I’ve worked with them and know what they think about a wall…it can’t be built high enough for them and a 1/2 mile deep minefield would on their wish list too.

      Like

  29. Hanuman says:

    Can Trump legally display various prototype Wall segment on the Mall to get a measure of approval from visitors?
    Separate voting machines for domestic vs foreigners.

    Like

    • montanamel says:

      Special voter’s booth for non-resident/illegals/non-English speakers…wired to the nearest clothes dryer for 240 vac 1-ph….one fried burrito at a time please! Check-6

      Like

  30. czarowniczy says:

    The Rats will never let a wall go up, just as Trump’s promised us that we will have one the Rats have promised their corrosive base that they won’t let one go up. The committee that was put together to find a middle ground was just another delay in the process of letting the clock run out.

    If the Wall does start to go up you can be sure the Rats will find ways to stall until they’re in they’re position to have it torn down. Pelosi was shoehorned into the Speaker’s slot as she’s the quarterback for the Death to Trump and His Agenda team, and that Wall is their link to the Hispanic community. I think their main target is still Trump, if they can get him out they believe they can deal with a lame duck Pence and will be without effective opposition from the Republicans in 2020. The Wall is important but dumping Trump is still Job One on their list, flooding the US with a few million from south of the border central to their changing the voting dynamic.

    Like

  31. G. Combs says:

    All President Trump has to do is declare La Raza an Enemy of the USA intent on invading for the purpose of stating claim to 1/3 of the lands of the USA — which they ARE!

    RECONQUESTA

    …Conference on March 15 – 18, 2001, the official “MEChA Philosophy” was ratified. An excerpt from the document states: “as Mechistas, we vow to work for the liberation of Aztlan.”

    The MEChA Clubs on each of the Santa Barbara high school campuses are not the only ones. MEChA groups exist on 90 percent of the public high school, college and university campuses in the Southwestern United States.
    h ttp://www.mayorno.com/WhoIsMecha.html [remove space after h to make link active]

    And from http://humanevents.com/2006/04/07/emexclusive-emthe-truth-about-la-raza/

    “…Chicano is our identity; it defines who we are as people. It rejects the notion that we…should assimilate into the Anglo-American melting pot…Aztlan was the legendary homeland of the Aztecas … It became synonymous with the vast territories of the Southwest, brutally stolen from a Mexican people marginalized and betrayed by the hostile custodians of the Manifest Destiny.” (Statement on University of Oregon MEChA Website, Jan. 3, 2006)

    We are a bronze people with a bronze culture. Before the world, before all of North America, before all our brothers in the bronze continent, we are a nation, we are a union of free pueblos, we are Aztlan. For La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada.”

    “That closing two-sentence motto is chilling to everyone who values equal rights for all. It says: “For The Race everything. Outside The Race, nothing.”

    The WIK map even shows Aztlan rconnected to MEXICO!

    ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️
    Sure sounds to me like there is PLENTY of evidence out there that these caravans are intent on a HOSTILE TAKE OVER of several USA states! 😡
    ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️

    Like

  32. PoCoNoMo says:

    Just couldn’t contuse watching after 5:50 – Henry Cuellar, D TX – Typical Democrat numb-nut. My tolerance is worn down to the bone.

    Like

  33. kfish63 says:

    Layer upon layer of ineffective and truly asinine political discourse. Bring in the border patrol sector chiefs? Do these elected bozos watch the news? Do they understand how to use a google search for border chiefs being interviewed on TV? Do these political hacks ever analyze how absolutely absurd and out of touch they appear post interview?
    DJT, declare a national emergency and justify it with the reams of data on human trafficking, drug smuggling, and illegal migration.
    Reading some of the comments specifically related to prior administration mishandling of the border security issue (Janet Napolitano) makes me believe there is a huge amount of bribe money being held in the coffers of the DNC to prevent border security funding.

    Like

  34. Gary Lacey says:

    Schumer and Pelosi lied to the president about a wall deal. If sundance is right the Democrats are off to the races in getting DJT impeached…….that will guarantee DJT election in 2020

    Like

  35. The thing to keep in mind is that everything the RINOcrats are proposing in the way of ‘border security’ measures, are simply technologies that monitor the border, they do nothing to actually prevent unauthorized entry.

    The only way drones and seismic sensor can do anything other than measure violations of the US border is to weaponize them, which is not going to happen (and I’m not at all sure I would want that to happen because of the chance for ‘collateral damage’).

    Every time these monitoring systems are triggered, border agents will have to go to the location to prevent unauthorized entry, requiring a significant increase in ‘boots on the ground’ as well as risk to the agents.

    The case for physical barriers limiting numbers of unauthorized entrants is very strong. Only the most industrious and physically-fit individuals will even attempt to penetrate a physical barrier like those being propose for the US border. Whole families will no longer be interested in attempting it, because most women and children simply cannot scale such barriers.

    A physical barrier combined with monitoring systems allows ‘boots on the ground’ to focus on those with the capability of violating the barrier. In the long run, this reduces costs to border security.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s