Leaks Begin – FBI Contacts Accuser Deborah Ramirez…

Yesterday CTH noted/predicted the strategy by the political opposition to Brett Kavanaugh would become evident with leaks from corrupt officials inside the FBI to their ideological allies in the media.  In part, this strategy (create media narratives) was the reason for Debra Katz, attorney for Ms. Blasey-Ford, to hire Michael Bromwich.

As attorney Katz noted yesterday, the investigation is only one “step in the process” of destroying Judge Kavanaugh, their use of the media is another critical step.

Corrupt elements within the DOJ and FBI have a vested self and ideological interest in supporting attacks against supreme court nominee Kavanaugh.  Less than 18 hours later, those corrupt FBI officials begin leaking information to the Washington Post.

(Via Washington Post) The FBI has begun contacting people as part of an additional background investigation of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, including a second woman who alleges that the Supreme Court nominee sexually assaulted her, according to people familiar with the unfolding investigation.

The bureau has reached out to Deborah Ramirez, a Yale University classmate of Kavanaugh’s who alleges that he shoved his genitals in her face at a party where she had been drinking and become disoriented, her attorney said Saturday.

“She has agreed to cooperate with their investigation,” Ramirez attorney John Clune said in a statement. “Out of respect for the integrity of the process, we will have no further comment at this time.”  (read more)

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Cultural Marxism, Deep State, FBI, media bias, Notorious Liars, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Supreme Court, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

934 Responses to Leaks Begin – FBI Contacts Accuser Deborah Ramirez…

  1. Cathy M. says:

    Democrats have requested Montgomery County, MD Police & State to open a criminal investigation of Kavanaugh.

    Police say nope- At the time the alleged crime was committed, the alleged crime is a misdemeanor w/ a statute of limitations of one (1) year.
    Letter:
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/sadly-democrat-partys-plan-to-investigate-judge-kavanaugh-in-state-of-maryland-is-now-impossible/

    Liked by 20 people

    • JAS says:

      In other simpler words F U and the horse you rode on 🙂

      Liked by 19 people

      • mashall says:

        Spread this far and wide….

        Liked by 7 people

      • navysquid says:

        Jedi…Did you also notice that during her entire statement that she had the “cry voice” on but she did not shed ANY tears for such a traumatic experience? I’ve never seen that happen. And then, like you posted, she went into Happy and “Pretty Pose” as I heard the body language woman describe…Look at me, I’m pretty, you must believe everything I am saying to you.

        Liked by 17 people

        • Jedi9 says:

          Yeah! There is just too many inconsistencies in this woman’s story to even be considered credible! This like the hair on the Coke can all over again! I am not sure why Trump says her testimony was credible, but I am guessing he wants nothing to do with this and is playing along for the optics of politics, meaning “get to the vote and not anymore credence to this story.

          Liked by 8 people

          • WSB says:

            PT said she was compelling.

            Liked by 3 people

          • ethicall says:

            Christine Blasey Ford was in on it. Come on pundits and Republicans. Stop the “she was obviously in pain” so she is credible. She was acting. Maybe Ford cooked up the false allegation of unwanted groping on her own, but once Dianne Fienstein got Ford’s letter a plan was concocted to keep it secret until the judicial vetting process was over and then drop it like a bomb. Delay the confirmation vote as long as possible. Ford’s letter was their golden ticket and Ford actively went along with the Dems plan to delay delay delay. How do we know this?

            When the Republicans contacted Ford to get her testimony, immediately upon learning of her allegations, Ford said she was afraid to fly and could not come to D.C. right away because of that. She would need a week or more to travel there by land. Remember, the plan is to delay delay delay. In reality, during Ford’s testimony, she revealed that she is an avid flier, even to many other countries, and had flown, at least, six times in the last few months, including to the hearing on Thursday! She lied about her fear of flying. She was in on it.

            When the Republicans heard she had a “fear of flying” they sent emails and letters saying, “We will come to you, anytime, anywhere”. Strangely Ford never responded to that offer. In her testimony Ford lied and said she never knew that they had offered to come to her. The whole world knew about it and her lawyers knew about it. And, yes, they told her. She did not respond because the plan was to delay delay delay and here was another opportunity to delay. Ford was in on it.

            And, the coup de grâce, was when, after saying in her little girl voice that she really didn’t remember why or how she got a lawyer, maybe it was advice from her “beach friends”? (voice tilting up like a question) Ford was forced to reveal that Dianne Fienstein, the woman who kept her letter secret for 20 days, until right before the vote to confirm Kavanaugh, was the person who set her up with a radical, leftist, never Trump lawyer named Katz.

            And we don’t need to ask Ford, who is a democrat, if her motivation for coming forward now, versus 36 years ago, was political. She told us it was strictly political in her testimony. She said that the only reason she came forward was to keep [conservative Catholic] Judge Brett Kavanaugh from being nominated and confirmed to the Supreme Court. Read her testimony. Ford was not sympathetic. She lied under oath many times and has viciously harmed Judge Kavanaugh and his family. She needs to be charged and tried. (Hat tip to Prosecutor Rachael Mitchell who, through her methodic, careful questioning, brought two of those lies out into the open. We are grateful.)

            Liked by 5 people

            • Sandra says:

              She was never vetted. Is it true she is not a psychologist? Is it true she teaches CIA undergrads? Is it true Stanford changed her credentials? Is it true her dad is deep CIA? Is it true her brother is a Washington lawyer also connected to CIA? Is it true she got the building permit in 2008 to add a second door? Is it true that her husband is connected to a drug company that deals and tests memory altering drugs? Is it true she has joined it law suites against Reps and listed herself as Blasey, PHD? Art the pictures of her and Soros and lying by the pool with all the alcohol bottles, cans etc valid? Why was her electronic record so deeply scrubbed? Who has the power to eliminate those records? How did she do in High School after this incident? Who knew her in College? What was she like? How many shrinks has she dealt with? What if any drugs was she on when she took the lie detector test; when she testified. Why were there no foundations laid about her past credibility? etc

              Liked by 2 people

            • NJ Transplant says:

              ethicall – I agree with you. Ford has told too many lies to be believed.

              I don’t think Judge Kavanaugh ever met Ford. He went to an all boys Catholic high school. The judge also said that they only went to parties with girls from the all girls Catholic high school. I went to an all girls Catholic high school. We only hung out with boys from the affiliated all boys Catholic high school. In those days, Catholic school students didn’t hang out with students from non-Catholic schools. There were probably plays and other activities where the boys and girls schools both participated.

              The 3rd accuser was a graduate at the time of the allegations. She went to a public high school. I am sure the judge also never met her.

              Judge Jeanine had on a prosecutor last night and he said that Ford’s “memory” looks to be the result of hypnosis, which is notoriously unreliable. Hypnosis can also create false memories.

              If they ever release the marriage counselor’s notes, we may find out that she had false memories due to hypnosis.

              Liked by 1 person

          • jederman54@yahoo.com says:

            Inconsistencies that an ethical “press” would point out because it’s important to be OBJECTIVE and report truth to the citizens.

            As PTrump reiterated in WV, the American “press” is the enemy of the people. They have, since the campaign/election of the immature, ill mannered empty suit in 08, made it in your face clear that they have chosen sides. Their corporate leaders have gone full marxist and all things Left.

            The ONLY possible reason for this move is they want to “radically transform” our governing system.

            Liked by 2 people

          • BigTex says:

            She also happens to be department head of the CIA Undergraduate Intern Program at Stanford and her father is and grandfather was CIA as well. Deep ties to CIA there. Coincidence?

            Like

        • 6x47 says:

          I knew Holocaust survivors who weren’t this torn up 36 years later.

          Liked by 1 person

        • mcfyre2012 says:

          No tears, no red eyes, no mucus to match the quivering, hesitant, childlike voice.

          Liked by 3 people

          • You are correct, it is a technique called Up Talking, ( inflection of the last word of each sentence ) , and is used to give the impression of youth and vulnerability, according to people in the acting profession, her testimony as “pure theater , textbook acting “, and that she has been coached!!! And now for a few other observations, an alleged PHD doesn’t what exculpatory means ? Yes Ford heads up the CIA Undergraduate INTERNSHIP program at Stanford University , Ford’s brother, Ralph3 used to work for the international law firm Baker-Hostetler, the same firm that supposedly created FUSION GPS ! And both of the above are located in the same building, cozy! It is also floating around that Ford’s mother, father and two of her siblings did not sign a letter of support for her? I wrote an extended tweet on this very subject a day or 2 ago, I was so wrung up I just had to vent.

            Liked by 1 person

        • bitterlyclinging says:

          How many years has she sat in a chair listening to people on her therapy couch spill their innards out?
          She knows precisely when to shed a tear, when to just let her lip quiver, when to shift her body position in order to elicit the most sympathy out of her listeners.
          And you thought Al Pacino did a good job pretending to be Michael Corleone.

          Liked by 1 person

      • Cathy M. says:

        That’s almost as crazy as a seal slapping your face with an octopus.
        https://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/news/national/watch-seal-slaps-kaikoura-kayaker-in-the-face-with-an-octopus/

        (originally posted on another site)

        Liked by 7 people

      • Julie Walters says:

        This woman seriously has arrested development. She portrayed herself as having the savvy of a 13 yr old teenager. Whether she is truly that naive/clueless, who knows. She may have been coached.

        Liked by 6 people

        • Cathy M. says:

          Or, something very bad happened to her when she was around that age or younger.

          Liked by 3 people

          • Sgt Stryker says:

            She got slapped in the face by a brewSKI.
            Traumatic

            Liked by 4 people

          • Daniel says:

            How does that explanation wash against the growing list of false details in her testimony? She flies for various reasons everywhere around the world and yet tells the Senate she’s afraid to fly? I’ll bet she has a lot of frequent flyer miles out there. It has been proven by photo evidence, her story about the second front door was a lie as well. There’s just so much wrong with her testimony and so many other things, the claim of her having been a victim of something or someone else is non sequitur.

            Are you suggesting that people who have been hurt are entitled to lie? Entitled to absolutely destroy the lives of this man and his family? I have no doubt some people actually think so.

            Liked by 4 people

            • Cathy M. says:

              Daniel- “Are you suggesting that people who have been hurt are entitled to lie? Entitled to absolutely destroy the lives of this man and his family? ”

              How in the world did you come up with that interpretation of my post?? I suggested no such thing.
              Yes, I believe she lied on just about everything and No, it’s Not justified OR she “believes” her false allegations are true & accusing Kavanaugh was also was not justified.
              You explain her voice & responses of a 6 – 8 yr. old during part of her testimony.

              And Yes, I believe that Kavanaugh is innocent of the accusations & he and should not have to go through this.

              Liked by 3 people

        • WSB says:

          She may have been badly coached by Alyssa Milano, who was sitting about four rows back.

          Liked by 5 people

          • gman-reloaded says:

            Yeah-and Milano had her “smart” glasses on, pen in hand, taking notes. A pen is not what Milano is known for having in her hand.

            Look folks. It’s O.V.E.R. FOR KAV-FULL STOP.

            Kav will never, ever serve a single day on the supreme court. This delay plan was formulated long ago by Dems and RINOs alike, including that bumbling idiot Grassley. The criminal referral letters and the one from Orin Hatch have ZERO impact.

            Better vote them all out in November, or you ain’t seen nothing yet.

            Like

        • Ringo Phonebone says:

          She claimed her grades started to fall after the alleged event, but she got into Yale(?)! And yet she is Ph.D? I smell rotten fish.

          Liked by 8 people

        • vkroo11 says:

          My-Ultra victim or just devious as hell.

          Liked by 1 person

        • Arrest Soros says:

          No actually she is using coached voice.
          Look at this expert demonstrate that.

          Liked by 5 people

        • Sandra says:

          But she is a professor teaching young students!!!!

          Liked by 1 person

        • tgimacb says:

          Act the part of giddy, vulnerable high school teenager.

          Like

      • BlueDevil93 says:

        That was possibly a psychological technique. First thing someone asserting dominance does, is, get you to do something for them. Spycraft 101. It was so simple. She made it sound so innocent. She made it sound as if she hadn’t even asked a favor. Pure genius if she is working them and not really the little valley girl she portrayed. Incredibly smooth.

        Later she goes fishing. She tries to get them too nail down Mark Judge’s timeline at Safeway for her. On the live view, I dismissed the coffee at first, and, thought the Judge timeline was her first assertion of her dominance over them. No, it was the coffee. She had them from the start.

        Someone posted a reporter had already filled in the timeline for her. If true. She was merely asserting dominance and getting them too work for her. All while acting like a little child. If not, she was working them for information prima fascia.

        She then had Mitchell rubbing her chin. Sign she has her sold. I watched her eyes when Mitchell did this, it appeared Ford read this as if she had actually sold Mitchell. I questioned whether Mitchell was using this as a technique to actually sell Ford. Ford of course would have been suspicious of this. But, she seamed to think she had sold her imho.

        Be very careful around this creature. Coffee doesn’t cure rape. But, It let her win the dominance game and take control without anyone, even experienced politicians, knowing it before the games even began.

        I had to laugh when Feinstein got hung with answering who leaked the letter. Ford and her attorney’s had already packed up and left town.

        Dangerous little damsel in distress.

        Liked by 7 people

    • iRock says:

      Montgomery Police also said they don’t investigate unless the accuser asks them to investigate in compliance wih a rape org sensitivity.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Phil Bacon says:

      How the heck does anyone know if the house was in Maryland. Columbia Country Club is within a mile or two of the District of Columbia.

      For all we know it could be a D.C. house, different jurisdiction, different laws.

      Liked by 3 people

  2. ATheoK says:

    Just how many FBI agents would be involved in questioning Ramirez?
    Two?
    Three?
    Surely, not more. That narrows down who is leaking rather tidily.
    Pass along a little chosen information unique to each agent and prosecute the one who leaks that tidbit.

    Clean out the vipers!

    Liked by 7 people

  3. Liked by 15 people

  4. Liked by 9 people

  5. Ted says:

    Is it still a crime to lie to the FBI?
    I’m pretty sure there was a fairly recent investigation where that was a pretty big deal.
    Or is it only a crime when they hope you will lie to them?

    Liked by 5 people

    • navysquid says:

      Or you could have posted it this way from what we’ve seen in the last two years in going after POTUS:

      “Is it still a crime for the FBI to lie?”

      Liked by 5 people

    • Steve says:

      It is probably a crime to knowing lie to the FBI agent doing the investigation, BUT if you are just passing along to them rumors that you heard then you can say any crazy thing that pops into your head.
      Now we will hear about Kavanaugh raping pre puberty little girls and boys and every perversion known to man. A FBI background check isn’t concerned with gathering absolute facts. It is just vacuuming up any and all information.

      I fully expect any liberal that the FBI interviews to lie their ass off with crazy stories hoping to derail the nomination. The phone chains are ringing as we speak with people passing around wild stories to give to the FBI.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. mashall says:

    As harsh as the reality is…
    To control the argument, one must control the lexicon. (vocabulary)
    There is not such thing as
    Pro-Choice and Pro-Life.

    There are Mothers who love there babies.
    and
    Those Mothers who kill their babies.
    The reality is so harsh a euphemism (abortion) was created.

    Liked by 9 people

    • Ausonius says:

      For decades I have reminded people that the stupid circumlocution “a woman’s right to choose” needs to be complete….i.e. “to choose to kill her unborn baby.”

      DEM: “I Support a woman’s right to choose to kill her unborn baby!”

      Let’s see how popular they would be when the stark reality is repeated thousands of times!

      Liked by 9 people

    • mashall says:

      I wish all ladies the best of health.
      Calling the killing of their child “Women’s Healthcare” is insane.
      Now..
      On Adoption.
      Out of sight, Out of Mind.
      Many millions of people are Adopted instead of murdered.
      They are happy, healthy, normal as the next, folks.
      They just don’t have “I’m adopted” written on their forehead.
      God Bless their Mother for honoring God.

      Liked by 9 people

      • mashall says:

        We have no idea who is adopted and who is not,
        Fund Adoption Programs not Planned Parenthood (Euphemism for Kill your Baby Center)
        How do these Women think they’ll explain it, when they are standing in front of God?

        Liked by 5 people

      • dwhitehurst says:

        For what it’s worth, I was adopted at 2 weeks old in 1970. Though abortion wasn’t legal yet, it still was possible. Adopted by wonderful Christian parents. Grew up to be a Lutheran minister, married with four beautiful children. I really have never had a big urge to find and contact my birth mother, maybe for fear that my sudden appearance would shake her life up too much. But if I did, I simply would tell her, “Thank you for your sacrifice of carrying me to term and not aborting me.”

        Liked by 10 people

        • My mom was adopted in 1940 right after birth. Her adoption was kept secret because her parents had adopted my grandpa’s sister’s son & he was called a bastard to his face by the small Finnish community they were living in in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. My mom’s adoption was kept secret by her parents until she went to marry. My parents kept her adoption secret from my brothers & I until our other (blood relative) grandmother died, they told us on the way home from the funeral.

          I became obsessed as a teenager to learn about my mom’s birth parents, but she was never interested. It wasn’t until 2000, when Mom was 60 & her mom was dead & her dad incapacitated by a stroke that she became willing to allow me to really search & supported this endeavor by obtaining her original birth certificate.

          Although it was never my intent to intrude on the birth families, for like you we didn’t want to upset their lives, a series of events lead unexpectedly to a phone call to me by one of my mom’s birth cousins (her birth mother’s sister’s daughter). This lead to many interactions online and several in person, with both the birth parents’ surviving family members. We actually had lunch with this cousin & her sister again a couple weeks ago!

          My mom has 2 half sisters on her birth-father’s side & through our interactions over the years she had a significant impact on re-establishing her younger sister’s relationship with Christ. I guess the bottom line point of my reply is that you might consider bathing your decision to search or not in prayer. It’s possible that the Lord might want to use your blood connections to various people to “heal the breech” in their hearts.

          My husband only learned that he had a birth sister at his mother’s funeral. He was devastated to learn that she’d had another child & never told him about her. As an adult we discussed the topic on a visit with his older half brothers. They were both convinced that there wasn’t a day that went by that their mom didn’t think about the daughter she was coerced to give away & that she likely grieved that loss every day for the rest of her life.

          Just a couple of years ago on a visit with his mom’s sister my husband heard from her directly about how she also was forced by her family to adopt out her own baby in very similar circumstances to what happened to his mother. This woman in her 70’s still carries deep scars related to the loss of her child…

          It sounds like your life has been very blessed, as has my mom’s! & we all have perhaps a deeper grasp of what it might mean to be grafted into the Vine or adopted into the Family of God because of the unique journeys we’ve experienced in relation to Family.

          God Bless You Richly!

          Liked by 5 people

          • dwhitehurst says:

            Thanks. Point is: Unlike so many of the aborted (whom I expect to meet in Heaven), I was given a chance at life, a productive life by Grace alone. Life is held to be a “natural right” like liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and it is because it is a gift from God. No one should play God, taking away from another what the true God has given them. But Government since 1973 has sanctioned this very thing. Tremble.

            God bless and keep you too!

            Liked by 4 people

            • Amen! Abortion is an Abomination & the blood of the innocent surely cries out to the Lord continuously…I’m so thankful that both you & my mom were spared to give Life to others. Blesssings

              Liked by 2 people

              • Ausonius says:

                The hatred of Life by Leftists is proven by their pushing of Death: “free” drugs (so that you can kill yourself literally and/or spiritually and/or psychologically), euthanasia for the aged or infirm, and death to the unwanted and inconvenient unborn.

                Liked by 3 people

        • Steve says:

          dwhitehurst you are proving why the liberals want abortion only and no adoption.
          Here you are on a conservative website. This is exactly what they don’t want to happen.
          The Democrats would much rather you be killed in the womb than to grow up as a conservative!!

          Liked by 2 people

    • dwhitehurst says:

      Language war is being lost. Feminized too. Slogans like “Female Reproduction Rights” = the right to kill an unplanned and unwanted baby in the womb.

      Statements like, “A women has the right to do with HER BODY as she pleases.” = Though this conceived child in my womb has it’s own body within my womb, has it’s own unique DNA, and was the result not just of my egg, but also of a man’s sperm, still I will deny those facts and just say it’s my own body.

      Liked by 7 people

      • mashall says:

        Thank you for posting.

        Liked by 2 people

        • mashall says:

          I thought this was relevant as it seems this (Preservation of the Roe Abomination) was the reason they are protesting Judge Kav. The destruction of our 2nd Amendment is the primary target in their dark agenda.

          Liked by 5 people

      • Daniel says:

        Only so long as you refuse to speak out against it.

        For example, prior to the popularization of the prison cultural expression “tossed salad” it used to be FOOD! One of my more common forms of lunch at work consists of leafy vegetables and some other simple common salad ingredients were I apply dressing and then shake it up in a closed container to get it all evenly distributed.

        I go after everyone directly who challenges the name of what I eat for lunch. Stop with the mainstreaming of prison culture in our language. It’s disgusting. I’m sick of it.

        The co-opting of language IS the means by which leftists attempt to control the conversation. I’m reminded of some reporter trying to tell Candidate Trump he shouldn’t say “illegal aliens” and he responded by asking her what he should say. She told him and he responded again saying “I’m not going to say all of that…”

        Trump is a leader by example. We need to step up and follow that lead. People are rudely trying to tell you what words you should use, that they are offensive. Remind them they are being rude just by telling you that. People who claim to be offended “on behalf” of someone else they think should be offended need to find better ways of spending their time. And the very idea people should be protected against being offended is an affront to free speech in the first place. No one has the right not to be offended.

        Liked by 6 people

        • Excellent example of why leaving prisoner slang to prisoners is a great idea. Liberals have debased our language in so many ways. If these perversions of terms are ignored and not embraced by the mainstream they will wither and die on a side branch.

          The worst to me is how PP & LBGT crusaders are getting entry into grade & middle school to pervert young minds with these words & concepts. Teabagging was just the beginning. Anathema.

          Liked by 1 person

    • As Orwell said: propaganda.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. Pam says:

    Liked by 12 people

  8. Pam says:

    Liked by 12 people

  9. Jenevive says:

    Question I have about the Avenatti client. Did he
    coordinate that with the Dems or did he just
    decide to get in on the action. Because none
    of the Dems every really seem to get on board with
    that story?

    Liked by 5 people

  10. Eaglemom says:

    Hmmm…….FBI to also interview Ford’s ex-boyfriend Brian Merrick, Ford’s ex-classmate Lisa Everett and Kavanaugh’s best friend Donny Urgo, in addition to Mark Judge, among others.

    Liked by 7 people

  11. Boots says:

    Wow! The blog that had downloaded Ford’s 1982, 1983, and 1984 yearbooks has vanished! EVERY yearbook talked about drinking, partying, chasing boys, having boys sleep over, picking up boys.
    http://thewashingtonstandard.com/christine-fords-yearbook-dangerous-hallucinatory-operation-of-a-motor-vehicle-by-christine-blasey-caused-potentially-fatal-crash-in-high-school/

    Hell! Wish I’d known how to download that site and the info.

    Anyone know anyplace else where the yearbooks are?

    Liked by 7 people

  12. covfefe999 says:

    What does Christopher Wray do? Does he make any attempt at all to identify and punish leakers?

    Liked by 2 people

  13. covfefe999 says:

    I am not ignoring the negatives, but I do find it amusing that the lying b’s Blasey and Ramirez have to talk to the FBI and also so do the friends and acquaintances they threw under the bus. A whole lot of people are angry at the b’s.

    Liked by 5 people

  14. renzi2018 says:

    I love Reddit- here ya go. h/t to someone there-

    note the lame ad hom by the barely understandable feminist? expert du jour

    Liked by 1 person

    • covfefe999 says:

      I don’t see a date but judging by one of the ads it looks like it this was broadcast before the Blasey hearing debacle. Did anything come of it?

      Liked by 1 person

      • renzi2018 says:

        hmmm. still trying to get back to my link- but the answer is NO- I don’t think anything came of it- my point is to show how fast things move, how many skeptical voices online – including Reddit, and how open source gives a lot of interesting convo’s and facts that often trip up a poorly organized Narrative- which is what I see being assembled on Fords behalf by the scrambling Left and partners in the media

        Liked by 3 people

      • renzi2018 says:

        Reminds me of Glenn Reynolds- another polymath

        Liked by 1 person

  15. renzi2018 says:

    Cornyn to Feinstein- “did you ask your staff?”
    Do you believe DiFi?

    Liked by 3 people

  16. renzi2018 says:

    “They wont like it when we play by their rules…” ~ Col Kurt Schlicter

    All Stations- WARNO, stand by for OPORDER to EXECUTE-

    Liked by 3 people

  17. Pegon Zellschmidt says:

    Who controls the interview, the FBI or do they cow to her attorney’s parameters. Look for notes in the margins of the report, ‘Accuser came off as very believable, super truthful.’

    Liked by 2 people

    • Milton says:

      I am sick and tired of this she “came off as believable” narrarative. The law is supposed to be based on facts. We are watching too many movies and TV that are not based on the American legal system. .

      The shisters Feinstein, Schumer, Blumenthal, Sanders are trying to impose Talmudic law on a Christian nation. This is part of their one world government, one law, one religion belief system.

      “An interesting comparison to the American legal system’s attempt to impose an imperfect finality is the Talmud’s criminal justice system, which imposes no deadline on a condemned defendant’s ability to raise new questions concerning his guilt. One feature of the Talmud—Judaism’s compendium of religious and civil law, rabbinic tradition, and philosophy—is its striving to know the essence of a thing.”

      https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.co.th/&httpsredir=1&article=4511&context=wlulr

      Liked by 1 person

  18. Margarita says:

    I don’t think Ford is collateral damage in this game. She’s a player. She started it. She didn’t expect it to be kept confidential for long because she expected it to be used as a weapon against Trump. She’s not all that innocent, come on. She tried to look and sound dumb so people would think she’s a victim, but she’s not.

    Liked by 13 people

    • zephyrbreeze says:

      Ford with the CIA connected Grandpa, Daddy, and Brother who works at a law firm related to Fusion/GPS, and who herself mentors CIA agents at Stanford, can put on her big girl panties and face the music.

      Liked by 8 people

    • WSB says:

      We should be looking into any activity Ford was part of in 2012, when Kavanaugh was on Romney’s SCOTUS list. I ran across a newspaer article that was starting to spread rumors about Kavanaugh then.

      But, of course, the rest if the frame job was never needed in 2012 because Zero was able to rig that election. IMHO.

      Liked by 7 people

    • Eskyman says:

      She’s a player all right. Reminds me of Aunt Ada Doom in Cold Comfort Farm, who “saw something nasty in the woodshed” ages ago and has used that experience to control everyone around her ever since. She’s a nasty piece of work if you ask me!

      Liked by 4 people

    • Risa says:

      I believe she is loving the attention. She will be the new darling of the Left if she manages to be part of a successful operation to deny confirmation for Kavanaugh.

      And the gobribeme accounts don’t hurt, either.

      Liked by 4 people

    • graphiclucidity says:

      It’s self-evident that Ford wanted no real confidentiality, since she was contacting the Washington Post at the same time she was contacting politicians in Congress.

      Liked by 2 people

  19. Rawkstar says:

    Sorry to barge in late on yalls thread, but man when I heard that (excuse my language) fake butt weird shakey voiced naysty naysty NAYSTY lib activist skank hoe psychotic shrinkey shrink “professor” Ford who’s intermarried with the Peter Strzok CIA family and just HAPPENS to reside in DiFi’s district say that she argued with her hubby and contractor about how aesthetically her house needed to “look like ass” with 2 front doors cause she’s been trying to run out a front door ever since Kav tried to grope her in a life threatening manner, I couldn’t believe they were trying to pull this shit. I was sincerely pissed at my friends who said (before Kav’s testimony) “Kav’s cooked. She sounds credible”. Then I realized Kav May have actually been a victim of a rape train gone bad that HE had organized. If the FBI uncovers this, his victim status will get him instantly confirmed. Yes that was one sentence with no paragraphs.

    Liked by 6 people

  20. zephyrbreeze says:

    Swetnick worked at Portland-based Webtrends for a few months in 2000, according to a civil suit the Portland company filed against her late that year. The company said she was hired as a professional services engineer to work off-site. It’s not clear whether she ever worked in Webtrends’ Portland office.

    In the suit, Webtrends alleged Swetnick claimed to have graduated from Johns Hopkins University but the company said it subsequently learned the school had no record of her attendance. Webtrends said she also “falsely described her work experience” at a prior employer.

    The suit also alleges Swetnick “engaged in unwelcome, sexually offensive conduct” while at Webtrends and “made false and retaliatory allegations that other co-workers had engaged in inappropriate conduct toward her.”

    The suit alleges Swetnick “engaged in unwelcome sexual innuendo and inappropriate conduct” directed at two male employees during a business lunch, with Webtrends customers present. Swetnick claimed two other employees had sexually harassed her, according to the suit.

    Webtrends’ suit said it determined Swetnick had engaged in misconduct but could not find evidence to support her allegations against her colleagues. Later, the company alleged, Swetnick took medical leave and simultaneously claimed unemployment benefits in the District of Columbia.

    In the suit, Webtrends alleged Swetnick threatened legal action against the company over her own harassment claims. The lawsuit claimed that act defamed the business and sought at least $150,000 on behalf of an employee that Swetnick had allegedly made false statements about.

    https://www.oregonlive.com/silicon-forest/index.ssf/2018/09/julie_swetnick_one_of_kavanaug.html

    Liked by 10 people

    • wolfmoon1776 says:

      Love it! Thank you. Wow. This lying skank needs to hook up with Avenatti. They were MADE for each other.

      “In the suit, Webtrends alleged Swetnick claimed to have graduated from Johns Hopkins University but the company said it subsequently learned the school had no record of her attendance. Webtrends said she also “falsely described her work experience” at a prior employer.”

      She’s done. OVER.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Golfbro11 says:

      I truly believe that Ramirez and Swetnick/CPL sunk the Democrats chances of sinking Kavanaugh’s nomination. Dr. Ford is a liar, but they coached her up and made her somewhat sympathetic to the uninformed voter. When they realized it wasn’t enough they said let’s jump the shark. The lurid unbelievable allegations by these other two made Ford even less credible than she already was. Now the FBI is going to have a field day. My bet is by Tuesday the Background check will be updated. And then the Dems will go back to their hating FBI mantra. Which will extremely funny after their only hope was Trump Russia muH FBI muH Mueller. The worm is turning and the Dems are drowning in their own S*%#

      Liked by 4 people

  21. mashall says:

    Trump Rally Fight Compilation.

    Go to 8:30

    “We gotta go and we gotta knock the sh*t outta these people”

    MAGA

    Liked by 1 person

  22. JoD says:

    Even the Non-Commie media is spreading this “poor little Chrissy” crap. She was betrayed by that mean old Chi Fi. All little Chrissy wanted was to remain anonymous.
    Cut the crap!
    Everybody is treading very lightly. It’s disappointing that nobody seems willing to even gently suggest, that she might not be telling the truth.
    SHE IS A LIAR…..see, that wasn’t so hard.
    This entire production is a set-up. They have spent months planning, manipulating and grooming, this not so stupid bitch.
    The Commies believe that “Killing ” Kavanaugh is the Keystone to regaining power and they are willing to do ANYTHING to make it happen…….ANYTHING.

    Liked by 4 people

    • MouseTheLuckyDog says:

      Yes. I think she is a liar, but about one thing. That she is 100% certain that BK did. Notice how when she was asked what friends she told, she sort of stumbled and then finally said “breach friends”. Want to bet her “beach friends” are really social media friends?

      That, if the FBI recovers her scrubbed media records, they will find discussions about this with her friends “Are you really unsure it was him. Think hard. It must have been him.”

      Liked by 1 person

    • Joemama says:

      Correction. They have spent at least 6 years planning. They were poised to pull the same smear campaign n 2012, had Obama not won.

      Liked by 1 person

  23. kcockroft says:

    Why are we paying for any of this stupidity!?? Our money should be for the defense of this nation not Mueller or any other CIA junk and again we see congress dodging any work as investigating the nominee and accuser as is their job. Probably going to party or to eat at a fancy restaurant is far mor important than their work. All are such low lives.

    Liked by 2 people

  24. kcockroft says:

    Why are we paying for any of this stupidity!?? Our money should be for the defense of this nation not Mueller or any other CIA junk and again we see congress dodging any work as investigating the nominee and accuser as is their job. Probably going to party or to eat at a fancy restaurant is far mor important than their work. All are such low lives.

    Like

  25. Boots says:

    Something I don’t understand here.

    Sundance has spent over a year proving over and over again the FBI is weaponized against Trump and will stop at nothing, probably not even murder, to take Trump down and out. And even though Comey, Strzok, McCabe, et al are gone, the FBI is still rotten to it’s core. It’s refusal to give Congress the docs Congress asked for is a small example of that rot.

    With all that everyone’s read on this site about the FBI/DOJ coup, why are some here – and that includes some long time posters – touting the idea the FBI will conduct an honest investigation, with honest 302’s and honest interview notes, of anyone connected with Ford, Ramirez, or Swetnick? Do you really believe the FBI will go after these people?

    On the contrary! FBI will exonerate Ford and everyone connected with her, just like the exonerated Clinton, Abedin, et al in emailgate.

    Can’t fathom or understand why anyone who’s been here a while would have *any* hope the FBI will play any other way but dirty, and do everything in their power to take down Kavanaugh.

    And if I’m wrong, I’ll be very, very happy.

    Liked by 2 people

    • vkroo11 says:

      That is my concern, too. The saving grace is the MD police department’s assertion that even if her claims were true, they amount to a misdemeanor, which has a life expectancy of a year. In my honest opinion, that puts all of Ms. Ford’s false hysteria into proper perspective.

      Liked by 2 people

    • gman-reloaded says:

      You are not wrong-you are spot on. It’s like people here are lining up to have Lucy pull the football AGAIN.

      Jeez-for a site that has many, many posters that obviously think they are smart…

      Better vote them all out in November.

      Liked by 1 person

    • amanda4321 says:

      Yes, this is my worry too. Oh, how I wish there was some honest person in the FBI who could access her scrubbed facebook and epose the truth about this organized attack.

      Liked by 2 people

  26. dagnyshrug says:

    Today’s FBI is the worst agency to conduct a fair investigation into anything. They have proven themselves to be corrupt, easily bought-off, bias Leftists with an unjustified hatred for POTUS, who will do anything to thwart his efforts. This is why dems pushed so hard for the FBI investigation while knowing Grassley has had 20 investigators on it for nearly two weeks. It was more than a delay tactic. It’s a certainty they will leak to shape public opinion, and manage to “find” something, while classifying their notes under the heading of National Security.

    Liked by 2 people

  27. Doreen Scott says:

    I hope they are going to bring Ford up on a perjury charge. She said she was a psychologist to the committee which by California law she is not. By California’s business and professional code, section 2903 it is against the law for anyone to use that title without being licensed.

    Like

    • iRock says:

      Dr. Blasey Ford works at a University and is exempt from registration. Primary sources are key, just saying.
      https://www.psychologydegree411.com/licensure/california/

      Getting your license to practice psychology in California can be a daunting task. Even after you spend nearly a decade getting an education, you still have to pass two exams and gain post-doctoral experience. The Board does have some exemptions to the registration rule. The first is if you are doing an accredited internship from the American Psychological Association or if the supervisor belongs to the Association of Psychology Postdoctoral and Internship Centers or the California Psychology Internship Council. You will also be exempt if you work for an educational institution or you have a waiver from a state department. The steps you need to take for licensure are detailed in the next section.

      Like

      • JX says:

        psychologydegree411.com is a primary source?

        Like

        • iRock says:

          Oops wrong link! Interestingly Blasey Fords 5 year acedemic exemption has expired.

          https://www.psychology.ca.gov/applicants/exemptions.shtml

          “Recently enacted legislation, Assembly Bill 705 (Chapter 218, Statutes of 2015), amended section 2910 of the Business and Professions Code to clarify that unlicensed employees of accredited or approved academic institutions, public schools, or governmental agencies are permitted to work without a license primarily to gain the necessary qualifying experience to obtain licensure and are not permitted to provide psychological services for more than a cumulative total of five (5) years without obtaining licensure as a psychologist. However, this statute is general in nature and does not supersede the more specific statutes for exempt settings, such as those in section 1277 of the Health and Safety Code and section 5068.5 of the Penal Code, and section 5751.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. These statutes provide maximum limits for the total number of years an unlicensed employee of an exempt setting may provide psychological services without a license, as well as setting other qualifications. Again, these limitations are based on the type of exempt setting that the unlicensed employee is employed by or contracted with.”

          Like

      • Doreen Scott says:

        Ford has never had a licence in California. Section 2903 says if you work in a educational institution you must call yourself a clinical psychogist only.

        Liked by 1 person

  28. iRock says:

    Leaks could easily come from the accuser, their radical lawyers, associates or even false narratives but then again its all a false narrative.

    Like

  29. Q&A says:

    Here is the Body Language Expert video that has been referenced by several treepers.
    One thing that jumped out at me was at 24:40 – transcript below:

    Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell: I’ve been really impressed today because you’ve talked about norepinephrine and cortisol, what we call in the profession basically the neurobiological effects of trauma. Have you also educated yourself on the best way to get to memory and truth in terms of interviewing the victims of trauma?

    Dr. Christine Blasey Ford: For me, interviewing victims of trama?

    Pros. Mitchell: No, the best way to do it – the best practices for interviewing victims of traums?

    Dr. Ford: No.

    Here is an article published by Christine M. Blasey:

    Posttraumatic Growth Following the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001: Cognitive, Coping, and Trauma Symptom Predictors in an Internet Convenience Sample
    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/153476560501100405

    Here are her degrees (from Wiki):

    * Undergraduate degree in experimental psychology in 1988 from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

    * Master’s degree in clinical psychology from Pepperdine University in 1991.

    * PhD in educational psychology from the University of Southern California in 1996.

    * 1995 dissertation entitled Measuring Young Children’s Coping Responses to Interpersonal Conflict.

    * Master’s degree in epidemiology, with a focus on the subject of biostatistics, from Stanford University School of Medicine in 2009.

    Does any reasonable person believe for a split second that this highly educated woman does not know a single thing about victims or symptoms of trauma?

    Liked by 2 people

  30. FanGirl says:

    Response to the posts that say she isn’t collateral damage and she’s a liar and the mastermind, etc.
    Who watched the hearing in order to find the truth? Independents, right? What do we gain by calling her a liar rather than collateral damage? Especially since I really don’t think it will be drilled down enough to convict her of anything of consequence. Does anyone doubt that if the Dems didn’t use her that they would have if she really were a victim deserving privacy and care?

    Like

  31. HJR27 says:

    Ford’s face could easily be superimposed over any of the current liberal progressive women in congress and all other progressive liberals and most of us who are not could ever detect a difference.

    Like

  32. Unklemunky says:

    All anyone needs to know about how voters are going to react to this in November was shown on Alyssa Morono’s face when Kavanaugh described his daughter suggesting they pray for the woman. Morono was fighting back tears. She knows this is a sham and so does everyone else with an ounce of morality in their soul. The same people who voted for trump in 2016 will be back in November along with many more folks who would never wish this type of baseless personal destruction of their son, husband, dad, brother, etc. this whole staged event has compounded my hatred for democrats and the democrat party. People no longer have an excuse to vote for these criminals. You vote D for anyone and you are part of the problem and you support this communist crap. Period.

    Liked by 2 people

  33. Richard says:

    I am not sure corrupt is the right word for the FBI officials. That would imply that they are in it primarily for the money. It seems to me that the primary motivation is ideological. Leftists have taken over the FBI as they have so many other institutions and are using the resources of the taxpayers to oppress the taxpayers.

    Liked by 1 person

  34. LULU says:

    Screen shot of Blasey Ford during her polygraph test from a CBS news report:


    at 2:38

    From another source:

    She looked quite different on August 7 than she looked in the hearing. Surprised?

    Would the senators have been as impressed if this person had appeared rather than someone who looks like a woman at their country club?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Watching the CBS reporter spin was nauseating. “The polygraph date of two months ago contradicts the narrative that this was a last minute process.” In what universe does this not show that it was exactly the sandbag attempt the Republicans assert? Get all the ducks in order and wait until the time to do the most damage to the nominee and string the nomination along past midterms. It also confirms this was a politically motivated stunt since Grassley & the Republican members of the Senate committee were left in the dark
      Thanks for posting.

      Like

  35. Senator Feinstein’s husband Richard Blum has served the university of Palo Alto as a member of the University of California Board of Regents since 2002. Kinda ironic that Christine Blasey Ford is a psychology professor at Palo Alto.

    Like

  36. Robert Van Brunt says:

    She’s a lying DemoRat operative!

    Liked by 1 person

  37. Leo Boyd says:

    My disgust has risen like bile in my throat over the last weeks from watching the Kavanaugh confirmation. The democrat side of the committee has been out to destroy this exemplary judge and human being since befor his nomination was announced by the White House. I am elated that they were unsuccessful. I looks likely that Judge Kavanaugh will be confirmed despite every single democrat save one voting no. I hope your constituents were and are watching.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s