The Goal is Delay: Kavanaugh Accuser Demands FBI Investigation Prior to Testimony….

Debra Katz is the lawyer for the accuser, Christine Blasey Ford.  She writes a letter to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley today demanding an FBI investigation prior to any testimony from her client.  The drama-filled motive here continues to be transparent:

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Election 2018, media bias, Notorious Liars, Supreme Court, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

432 Responses to The Goal is Delay: Kavanaugh Accuser Demands FBI Investigation Prior to Testimony….

  1. Bill says:

    Senator Grassley should subpoena both legal counsel and Ms. Ford.
    Show up by next Wednesday or the US Marshals will hall you in for Contempt.
    Don’t cry fire in a crowded theater/make false accusations and NOT expect to be held accountable.

    Liked by 15 people

  2. kinthenorthwest says:

    Don’t know how to do thread reader, but this whole thread is loaded

    Liked by 7 people

    • andyocoregon says:

      Somebody has something to hide. That’s what’s going on.

      Liked by 8 people

    • mr.piddles says:

      What, like with a cloth?

      Liked by 5 people

    • cali says:

      @kinthenorthwest: Exactly!

      Surprise surprise that Gloria Allred’s daughter Lisa Blum signed as 2nd attorney. That alone is a big red flag.
      That is their playbook and they repeat that over and over while none of this treacherous accusers never face justice smearing and destroying a person’s life.

      This accuser is a CIA asset and has undergone training in MK Ultra in Stanford where she currently lead the Undergraduate study and recruiting for the CIA.

      The FBI already declined to investigate this farce. They have more important matters to attend too. That is not Comey/McCabe/Mueller’s FBI anymore where they may would get their way.

      Tell her to pound sand because she is lying.

      The intent was never investigating this farce – the intent is to delay the vote of judge Kavanaugh until AFTER the election thinking the left wins back the house and senate so as to squash that Kavanaugh’s appointment.

      If they really cared why then did the dem party try to barter with the president: If he stops the declassification of the FISA docs plus they promise to cancel this liars accusation.

      Hmmm – I guess it depends what the word ‘is’ is right democratic party?

      I’m a happy camper that president sees this sham for what it is and told them a very sound ‘NO’ while informing them that Kavanaugh will be confirmed regardless.

      Liked by 6 people

      • kinthenorthwest says:

        WOw that is really interesting.

        Like

      • Artist says:

        ha! the first thing I said when I heard about this fraud pinkpussyhat was, ” Where’s Gloria Allred???”
        I guess her dopey daughter has followed in her slime trail and is now the go to sleaze ball.

        Liked by 1 person

      • tonyE says:

        This is all like the Battle of the Bulge.

        The Progressive Fascists thought they could invade and, if not win the war, at least get concessions from the Allies.

        Along comes Patton, ready for it, and pivots most of his Army North in three days and completely defeats the Nazis.

        Schumie, Feinstein, etc… they have nothing to bargain with. Trump will declassify the FISA stuff, might even clean some house in the FBI/DOJ AND get Kavanaugh in the SCOTUS.

        Furthermore, the horrendous behavior by the Progressives is actually motivating GOP voters to go out and VOTE. Vote for the RINO if you have to, I know I will… The RINO is better than the Fascists… because the notion of a “moderate democrat” no longer exists. Just listen to the likes of Jimmy Carter! Even he has moved Left.

        Remember: the Primaries are where we vote with the Heart, the General Election is where we vote with our Brains.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Bulldog84 says:

      I would not put much suspicion into the school taking its yearbooks off the net. What were the books doing there in the first place? This would seem to violate some educational privacy rules, absent releases signed by everyone. If you found out your kids’ photos were plastered online, would you be happy about it? Would you be happy as an alumnus about the public being able to pour over your awkward teen photos?

      I am far more suspicious that a friend of Ms. Blasey Ford’s got a ham radio license earlier this year. This is the same friend identified in a newspaper article as having knitted the brain hats for an anti-Trump “science” march.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Cuppa Covfefe says:

        Look up Classmates.com. They have thousands of yearbooks online, as do other companies that do similar “networking” sites.

        A school yearbook is not subject to the same privacy rules as personal items; moreover, in these days of Flickr, Instagram, Farcebørk, and Twitter, et. al., there is obviously little expectation of privacy on the part of said students/participants.

        The school was probably asked to take the yearbooks offline due to problems it was causing the web host (and potential problems, both legal, and “hack”-wise…

        Liked by 1 person

  3. paper doll says:

    The every coy, Flake and Corner are now saying if she doesn’t show up Mon, let’s vote. I think Poppy Bush made a few phone calls.

    Liked by 3 people

  4. teeheeman says:

    MARY JO KOPECHNE was not available for comment regarding the Brett Kavanaugh accusation.

    COLD ANGER = VOTE, VOTE, VOTE…..

    Liked by 7 people

  5. Jedi9 says:

    Investigate what? There is nothing to investigate and the FBI can’t do anything, nor is it in their jurisdiction to do so! This all a major BS smoke screen to delay the vote. She either shows up to testify or they go on and vote! This really has become unprecedented in modern day American politics and sure do hope that Democrats are remembered for being the party that you can never trust!

    Liked by 1 person

    • farrier105 says:

      You have to have a predicate in order to investigate in the first place. Who can supply that predicate? Only Ford. She has to tell her story to the FBI first, or she has to file a complaint with the police in the jurisdiction in which the crime took place. There has to be some detail in the recounting of the incident in order to establish reasonable suspicion that the crime took place. THEN the investigation begins in order to ascertain if reasonable suspicion can be elevated to PROBABLE CAUSE.

      Without a reasonable predicate to begin an investigation, there can be no investigation. That was the issue with the Carter Page FISA warrant. The FBI had to hide that there was no predicate to proceed.

      Ford cannot demand an FBI investigation that has no predicate as to the time of the incident, the location of the incident, and at least two credible witnesses to the event. What the FBI is being asked to investigate is the stuff of REGRESSIVE HYPNOSIS, which might be useful in intelligence analysis, but is not admissible in court as evidence. An FBI investigation that has no discernible starting point cannot proceed.

      Liked by 1 person

      • wrd9 says:

        Aside from murder or espionage, what crimes can the FBI investigate 36 years later? Ford should be told to bring it to civil court if she has a case. And Kavanaugh should be confirmed.

        Liked by 1 person

        • farrier105 says:

          There aren’t many after 36 years, and Kavanaugh would have been a juvenile offender with sealed record.

          There are statutes of limitation with lawsuits as well. Many are as little as three years.

          What this REALLY is amounts to an assault on Due Process of Law using divide-and-conquer tactics, in this case females vs. males. We take due process for males and chuck it when a female is the accuser. No assumption of innocence. No probable cause. No sixth, fifth, or fourth amendment rights. If you can strip all of that from one group, they will do it with another.

          If men like Weinstein got away with this crap all of those years, whose fault was it anyway? WHOSE FAULT? The ones who were SILENT. There is no getting around that.

          Liked by 1 person

      • MGBSE says:

        And your summary again CONFIRMS she and the entire RAT cabal are LIARS. This is business as usual…they do not care who they destroy, or how they destroy, as long as they destroy everything interfering in the advancement of their destroy America agenda.

        Per the LIAR, she and her husband went to Couples Counseling in 2012 “due to her repressed memory and delayed trauma now remembering the, maybe, 1982 “assault”. The “boys” were named. If true, the psychologist/psychiatrist likely would have notified authorities, which would likely have initiated a police investigation, which likely would have been noted in one of Kavanaugh’s many background investigations.

        None of this happened, because the LIAR met with liberal RAT operatives in 2012 – to strategize on how to destroy Kavanaugh in case Romney defeated Obama. Romney identified Kavanaugh as his Supreme Court choice. The beginnings of the LIE was likely formulated then, but Romney lost so the LIE was filed away until recently activated by the Communist Chinese Spy, Feinstein…who dutifully passed the LIARS LIE on to Congress.

        Like

        • farrier105 says:

          Back when McConnell refused hearings for Merrick Garland, I wondered what the Democrats would do to retaliate. They should have gone ahead with the hearings on Garland. As I posted back then in my blog, questions could be put to Garland, who was the manager of the Oklahoma City Bombing investigation, should be asked what happened to all the evidence that the FBI can no longer find, such as all the surveillance tapes from downtown OK City that morning. It would be the ideal time to ask about all of that, including related incidents, such as the murder of Kenneth Trentadue in his cell in the federal transfer facility in OK City.

          Not holding the hearings until after Obama was replaced would be something that would prompt sick nonsense like this from the Democrats. Some of them are now bringing up the handling of the Garland nomination as part of this latest escapade from these over-age children.

          Liked by 1 person

    • Doreen Scott says:

      She was not rapped and she wasn’t murdered. So what is the crime?

      Like

  6. The Devilbat says:

    OK, so this idiot expects the FBI to investigate something that allegedly happened 36 years ago to a woman who suddenly remembered an inappropriate advance while lying on her therapists couch.

    Oh yes, and it just happens that her parents home was foreclosed by Kavanaugh’s mother. Aside from her being a democrat activist, being completely nuts, and ignoring the statute of limitations, she has a great case (sarcasm). Here is an article about the foreclosure:

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/bad-blood-judge-kavanaughs-mother-foreclosed-on-far-left-accusers-parents-home/

    Here is one of the responses to the article:

    Cris Baker Mrs. Diogenes • a day ago
    Her ratings as an educator at https://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=1352705 earlier today included these two:

    Quote: “Christine ford is the worst educator I have ever experienced. Avoid taking her class and avoid any interaction with this person. I feel like she has something wrong with herand I am surprised no one has caught this.”

    Another review says: “Ford is unprofessional, lacks appropriate filters, and I am honestly scared of her … if you cross her, you will be on her bad side. … Absolutely the worst teacher I ever had.”

    But checking just now, these two ratings (and maybe others) have been deleted giving her a far higher rating now than she had this morning…

    Liked by 4 people

  7. FanGirl says:

    Nothing since 2014

    Like

  8. You can’t have an October Surprise in July. That’s why Feinstein sat on Ford’s letter.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. SandyJohn says:

    In Maryland, since 1973 , the age of majority is 18. If there was to be an investigation of this alleged incident between Kavenaugh and Ford, given their ages at the time (15 and 17) it would seem reasonable that the entire case would have fallen under the jurisdiction of juvenile authorities. All consideration would have been given for their age, and corresponding levels of maturity and culpability. Charges, if any, would have rightly the. been handled through juvenile proceedings to include sealing records once they reached 18. It appears that in the rush to judgement everyone seems to be evaluating a juvenile incident through the lens of an adult system when the entire issue would have been pursued, if at all, as minors.

    Liked by 3 people

  10. Think of it. If Kavanaugh is scrubbed as a SC justice because of this, he can’t return to his old job, due to this allegation. He can’t coach a girl’s team – ever, due this allegation. His life, as he knew it, is over. I just can’t imagine being this evil – to falsely accuse someone like this.

    Liked by 2 people

  11. If nothing else, comes of this…we must not only go out and vote, which we would, otherwise we wouldn’t be spending time on forums opining on this matter, but we must engage our FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS, the elderly, perhaps even in our own families and provide transportation. Spend the day driving people to the polls. Obviously, if they are conservatives. If not, drop them off someplace far from the polls. Still, we must be proactive. This election is PIVOTAL.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. farrier105 says:

    There is an anonymous report out on Twitter that Ford sent a letter like this about Neil Gorsuch. This is an allegation the FBI could investigate as it would be within the statute of limitations for criminal use of the mail system.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Facts says:

    It is all about delay, delay, delay.

    Instead of an FBI investigation, they should have asked Mueller to investigate. That would delay everything by 5 to 10 years.

    Liked by 2 people

  14. DMWT says:

    I “demand” to be queen of England now!

    Like

  15. JX says:

    Ford has established herself as a liar. She claims she “doesn’t want to come forward” yet she writes a letter to a Congressperson.

    When you begin with a lie why should we believe anything else you say, Ms. Ford?

    Like

    • Doreen Scott says:

      This woman plays the victim saying some young boy got fresh with her when they were both kids. Now we find out she is for open borders. How many woman and children have been raped and murdered by the same illegal aliens she wants running around loose in this country. It seems she is just another typical lying liberal who only cares about themselves.

      Liked by 1 person

  16. HJR27 says:

    How about an FBI investigation of Diane Feinstein’s negligence for sitting on this “bombshell???” information for so long? Schumer, Pelosi, Schiff, Feinstein, Waters..et al,
    historically it would be hard to find a larger congregation of miscreants in one place.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. Rose says:

    The lawyer should be disbarred, she’s well aware the FBI has no authority to investigate a case of assault. Second I hope the judge files a complaint against the lawyer with her governing bar society her behavior is beyond reprehensible.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. EJ says:

    Per Ingram’s show, FBI said no again. Grassley said, move on. Graham said, move on. Bush came out in support of him. Take the vote and let’s move on to the next issue. This is DUMB.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Granny Who says:

    The Dems have gone totally out of their minds. Their Presidential loss is still choking them. Get over it, people. Your hoodwinks are so blatant as to be moronic. Do any of you have any brains at all? I think NOT. Granny Who

    Liked by 2 people

    • lurker2 says:

      Just wait til Ginsburg leaves. Gonna be mayhem. haha

      Liked by 1 person

    • Minnie says:

      You said it, Granny!

      And the American voter, because we are such a compassionate, caring lot, will put them out of their miserable misery in November, so they may obtain appropriate mental health treatment.

      Because, all the mental health facilitators I know are so helpful /s

      Let them stew in their own hatred, they built that.

      VOTE!!!

      Like

  20. Kim Kincaid says:

    BYE tawana Bradley…..I mean Christine Ford.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. lurker2 says:

    The slimeball attorney fails to mention that she kept telling the media “Blasey wants to testify! Blasey wants to testify!”. Slimeball and her client never thought the GOP would allow them to do it. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Mike diamond says:

    Let’s get on with it ! Diane finestein,should be investigated for what she did in high school and college!!!and also how her husband was able to buy lots of us post office buildings!!!

    Liked by 1 person

  23. Mike diamond says:

    The demon–rats will do anything to delay,delay,delay!!!!it’s a shame and a disgrace! This is how Obama divided a nation!

    Liked by 1 person

  24. SJM says:

    Broaddrick: FBI Probe Ford Allegation? Then ‘Investigate My RAPE Allegations’ Against Clinton
    By Michael W. Chapman | September 19, 2018 | 10:53 AM EDT

    (CNSNews.com) — Commenting on Christine Blasey Ford’s allegation that Brett Kavanaugh assaulted her at a beer party some 36 years ago and that the FBI must investigate the matter now before she will testify about the supposed incident, Juanita Broaddrick tweeted that if the FBI goes back that far then it must also “investigate my RAPE allegations against Bill Clinton, too.”

    “If you want the FBI to go back that far @HillaryClinton @MSNBC to investigate Ford’s allegations …. let’s investigate my RAPE allegations against Bill Clinton, too. Seems only fair,” Broaddrick tweeted on Sept. 18.

    Juanita Broaddrick, a retired nursing home administrator, has long maintained that Bill Clinton, when he was the Arkansas Attorney General, raped her — a “forcible, brutal rape” — in a hotel room in Little Rock, Ark., on April 25, 1978. At the time, Broaddrick was 35, Clinton was 31. …MORE:

    https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/broaddrick-fbi-probe-ford-allegation-then-investigate-my-rape

    Liked by 1 person

  25. rayvandune says:

    Why does President Trump not refuse to comment on the Kavanaugh situation? It would be perfectly appropriate to say “I of support Brett and it would be inappropriate to say more at this time, since I also have faith in the Senate process as being led by Senator Grassley.”

    Every unscripted comment by the President is a potential landmine laid by the media. I heard a person this morning on NPR supporting Brett, and she was repeatedly asked if she found Professor Ford to be credible, obviously in an attempt by Steve Inskeep to get her on record as “attacking” Ford. She avoided that trap, but she was not clever enough to simply say “My opinion of that is irrelevant, but I know I cannot make that kind of judgement from newspaper articles, and that is exactly why she should take the Senate’s invitation to testify!”
    Would the President have been smart enough to either refuse comment, and/or use the comment to support the need for Ford to testify? I wish I could say yes, but I cannot.
    Grassley is stick-handling this pretty well and should not have to worry about what the President May say to some reporter instead of staying on his message and strategy.

    Like

  26. William Murphy says:

    Kennedy’s retirement effective July 31, 2018. The court is 4-4. No wonder the Dems want to delay?
    The next SCOTUS session begins October. SOON. iMPORTANT CASES
    SCOTUS – OCT & NOV,2018
    check Nielson vs Preap
    http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/terms/ot2018/
    If Kav’ is not seated and the court splits 4 – 4,
    any lower court decision will hold.

    Get it?

    Like

  27. DJ says:

    This is nothing more than a stall tactic, if she doesn’t testify next Monday then Thursday have Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing.

    Like

  28. Ristvan says:

    Maybe this has been pointed out upthread, maybe not. NOT going well for Feinstein.
    1. The FBI has no jurisdiction to investigate as there is no federal crime. Lawyer Katz FBI demand is legally nonsensical. It is pure political rationale to avoid Monday’s opportunity that Grassley extended-open session, closed session, with/without Kavanaugh present…just under oath.
    2. The Judiciary committee has nothing to investigate before her testimony, either. Blasey-Ford cannot remember how she got to the party as a 15 year old, when the party was, where the party was, or who all was there besides the two named in her letter, both of whom say it never happened. An investigation needs something specific to be investigated. This is contentless.
    3. Both the girlfriends Kavanaugh dated in high school and college say he was a gentleman. 65 other girls from all female Catholic schools that had social functions with Georgetown Prep during Kavanaughs years have also spontaneously attested to his character.
    4. All the accuser has is a few friends who have said ahe told them what was in the letter. So what.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. namberak says:

    A snippet from the best thing I’ve read about this– “If Dr. Ford had wanted the accusations taken seriously, she could have made them public before or during the confirmation hearings, when Mr. Kavanaugh had an opportunity to defend himself. Democrats eventually leaked the letter. If they had considered the allegations worthy of serious consideration, they could have leaked the letter sooner. But all parties involved waited until the eleventh hour to publicize a dubious, unsubstantiable accusation about an incident that allegedly occurred decades ago. Regardless of whether anything even resembling that event took place, the accusation is not credible. We cannot allow judicial nominees to be so flippantly destroyed.” https://www.dailywire.com/news/36040/regardless-what-happened-allegations-are-not-michael-j-knowles

    Liked by 2 people

  30. Sentient says:

    Grassley’s letter (9/19/18) to the accuser’s attorney https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-09-19%20Grassley%20to%20Katz%20-%20Ford%20Testimony.pdf
    The gist: We don’t need – nor is it appropriate for – the FBI to investigate. Accuser can testify to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday, in public or in private session (her choice).

    Like

  31. Granny Who says:

    “We seem to be forgetting a very important element in this entire nonsense. Someone should grill Feinstein….WHY did she delay reporting that letter? To me, THAT is the crux of the matter. She has spearheaded this entire situation, and PLEASE don’t ask me to believe she did this on her own. Her orders came from Pelosi and Schumer. Be HONEST, tackle this from the beginning. It is a terrible shame that our children are getting another very BAD history lesson.

    Liked by 1 person

    • New Nonna to Be, Again!!! 🤗 says:

      Right on, Granny!

      There’s just SO much wrong with this accusation, and we shouldn’t forget the current beginning of it.

      And when ANY of the Dems address the Ted and Bill bad behavior situations & how they were wrongly dealt with, maybe THEN they can say this accusation about Jydge K is not politically motivated.

      Until then, yea, right. 😤

      Liked by 1 person

    • anniefannie says:

      Diane may not survive her own election. This is what’s known as a two-fer! Get Kavanaugh off the bench and give DiFi some credibility (she is more a pariah in the Demoparty than Mad Max!

      Like

  32. Super Elite says:

    Dr. Ford’s lawyers’ letter reminds me of something I once heard a United States Marine say once, “Great gobs of goat shit.”

    Liked by 1 person

  33. anniefannie says:

    I am not attacking Dr. Ford. I am trying to figure out what her angle is. She waited over 30 years to report a sexual assault that she cannot reportedly say when or where it happened nor who was there. Ok. A letter was sent to Sen. Feinstein who obviously saw no credibility in it since she sat on it for 45 days. Now the feminists and the hypocrites are screaming for justice. We are supposed to believe everything in a letter. Last time I checked, there is a guarantee that the accused has a right to face the accuser and to ask questions of the accuser. The feminists are screaming that men have no heart. I am not a man. Maybe I don’t have a heart but I do have a brain. Maybe there is information that she is holding close to her vest. Why does she not testify? She needs to raise her hand and swear to tell the truth and then tell the story. The fact that she wants to lob a bomb and then tuck tail and run leads me to believe that she has no credibility. Funny that she “bared her soul” to a shrink only after her parents lost a foreclosure case decided by Kavanaugh’s mother. She shows all signs of being the 2018 version of Crystal Gayle Mangum and the Democrats are collectively Mike Nifong (coincidentally also a Democrat)!

    Liked by 1 person

  34. Kaiser Derden says:

    Kavanaugh should show up on Monday and say “I’m kind of think I was backpacking thru Europe that summer” … and when a Senator asks “Is that true?” he says … “Of course not but I thought it was “make shit up day” here in the Senate” … Thats what Ford will be doing figured I may as well join in …

    Like

  35. paper doll says:

    Has Ford’s letter to Feinstein been seen? Because I’m betting cash money the word” rape “was added by the army of Dem hacks. At this point I’m not sure there is a letter.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s