May 30th – 2018 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #496

In an effort to keep the Daily Open Thread a little more open topic we are going to start a new daily thread for “Presidential Politics”. Please use this thread to post anything relating to the Donald Trump Administration and Presidency.

trump-president-3

This thread will refresh daily and appear above the Open Discussion Thread.

President Trump Twitter @POTUS / Vice President Pence Twitter @VP

Sarah H Sanders Twitter @SHSanders45

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1,632 Responses to May 30th – 2018 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #496

  1. phoenixRising says:

    Liked by 8 people

    • lastinillinois says:

      CJ is an amazing kid.

      For whatever reasons, he gets it.

      Like

    • Kaco says:

      To be fair, I remember those times, back when Hillary called the black gangs “superpredators”. “These aren’t just gangs of kids anymore.” Gang violence was at an all time high with no stopping them, terrorizing neighborhoods, Crips and Bloods. I let people run on about this superpredator comment during the election, but cracking down on those gangs was the right thing to do at the time, it was out of control.

      Liked by 2 people

      • lastinillinois says:

        Agreed on the cracking down.

        But why the double standards regarding speech?
        No justification for it (and I know you justifying).

        Like

        • Kaco says:

          Well, from what I remember they were almost as bad as the MS-13, I say almost because I don’t think they were as vicious but still a plague,, it wasn’t just mischief but deadly gangs, so I actually agree with the superpredator. I wish these people against it knew she was specifying at the time, not calling all black people superpredators. It is a double standard, can’t call MS-13 animals, it was clarified he wasn’t talking all “immigrants”, but a specific set of them. Now they defend MS-13. It’s disgusting, so they bring up the superpredator, but it was kind of the same way at that.

          The Left doesn’t care, nothing is going to crack that nut.

          Liked by 2 people

        • lastinillinois says:

          Oops!

          ” ….I know you AREN’T…..”

          Liked by 1 person

      • sunnydaze says:

        Oh well, Ms.Hill wasn’t calling ALL black kids “super predators”.

        But then again, Trump wasn’t calling ALL Mexicans who cross the border illegally “rapists /bad people” but that didn’t help him much with the DemMSM now, did it?

        And now, every Dem halfwit repeats it like it’s means something.

        So…what’s good for the goose….

        Like

  2. phoenixRising says:

    Liked by 6 people

    • Troublemaker10 says:

      Wow. Maybe things will work out for her show after all…and boost a start up streaming company alternative at the same time. Interesting.

      Liked by 1 person

      • lastinillinois says:

        When one door closes ……

        Liked by 1 person

      • Lucille says:

        Ah, but after the drubbing she took from her cast, which of them will agree to come with her where Conservatives will be the bosses? She’d have to re-cast everyone.

        Actually, that’s not a bad idea for her to work with a cast of righties–who likely would be the only ones willing to work with her now anyhow.

        Like

        • Lady in Red says:

          I don’t think John Goodman, Lecy Goranson or Laurie Metcalf commented, did they? As for Gilbert and Fishman, Roseanne should avoid them in the future. They know Roseanne, and they know damn well she is not a racist. How long have they known her? Could neither of them pick up a phone and call or text Roseanne to clear the air before tweeting their feigned outrage?

          Liked by 1 person

          • phoenixRising says:

            Sara was doing some talk show on TV… hasn’t had an acting gig- then Roseanne gave her one on the Rebooted Show… talk about ungrateful …

            Like

    • Kaco says:

      What did she say that was “anti-semitic”? Don’t tell me her talking about that devil, Soros! He’s a self-proclaimed atheist anyway!

      Liked by 1 person

    • Kaco says:

      And isn’t Roseanne a pro-Israel Jew herself?

      Like

      • phoenixRising says:

        Indeed she is…
        her maternal grandmother lost her entire family in the Holocaust
        She has tweeted many times praising POTUS for moving the US Embassy
        She told the truth about Soros’ history during WWII –

        Like

        • Kaco says:

          The Left doesn’t care, they say whatever they want to say and label who they want, the only people that count are the ones on their side. That’s why Kanye isn’t black and Roseanne is anti-semitic, never mind any truths they are stating.

          Liked by 1 person

  3. patrickhenrycensored says:

    Liked by 4 people

  4. phoenixRising says:

    My last word (today, anyway!) on it – just want to illustrate Roseanne is more concerned over the smear of being racist, then she is losing the Show. She can back to fight because of that! Not for the Show.

    Liked by 7 people

  5. phoenixRising says:

    Liked by 2 people

  6. phoenixRising says:

    Now that’s what I call fighting back… note the Roseanne hashtag
    America will discover just who VJ is and how close she was and still is to Zero…

    Liked by 4 people

  7. Kaco says:

    I posted this in Sundance’s current post.

    I just called Devin Nunes DC office, they have an option to leave a message on his line for his work on the IC. I gave him my thanks and encouragement, despite what some Republicans, including Trey Gowdy are saying. I encourage everyone to flood his phone with positive words that the American people are behind him!

    Main: (202) 225-2523

    Liked by 2 people

  8. patrickhenrycensored says:

    Liked by 3 people

  9. phoenixRising says:

    Liked by 4 people

    • Perot Conservative says:

      Yes!

      Like

    • ForGodandCountry says:

      All I want is

      1) the IG report to show & prove INTENTIONAL FBI negligence and corruption in the Hillary email investigation, essentially “cooking the books” and proving she should have been charged with criminal felonies.

      2) For the evidence, testimonies, witnesses, etc. to be absolutely air-tight and unimpeachable.

      3) An unequivocal, clear, and inarguable recommendation to:
      a) re-open the Clinton email investigation; and
      b) bring criminal charges for ALL concerned above, including Hillary Clinton,
      based upon what is already known to be established fact within the IG report.

      Liked by 2 people

  10. sunnydaze says:

    Turning Point USA is doing some great stuff.

    I’m hoping that when enough black Americans start speaking out about how they are used by the white SJWs, it’ll start waking up some of the disgustingly brainwashed SJWs, too.

    Liked by 8 people

  11. ForGodandCountry says:

    WASHINGTON, DC – Professor Jonathan Turley, a top national legal expert on government investigations, commented on Thursday about Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ decision to bring in U.S. Attorney John Huber.

    Turley called it “brilliant” to combine all the powers of the U.S. Department of Justice’s inspector general with a prosecutor who can bring charges, seek indictments, and get results for President Trump far more quickly than a second special counsel.

    the media are wrongly reporting that Sessions will not appoint a second special counsel. “He did not foreclose the possibility of a special counsel,” Turley said.

    Instead, Turley explained that Sessions has ordered Huber to “team up with the inspector general (IG) within the Justice Department to investigate these matters.”

    Sessions informed Congress in his letter that all the matters recommended for investigation by Goodlatte and Grassley are “fully within the scope of [Huber’s] existing mandate.”

    He also informed the chairmen that Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who is working with Huber, has a staff of 470 investigators, giving Huber access to enormous investigative firepower that far exceeds the staff of any special counsel.

    “I think people are missing what could be a brilliant move here by Sessions. What he did is he essentially combined the powers of the inspector general with the powers of a line prosecutor.”

    “This prosecutor does have not just the experience and training to look for a criminal case; he has the ability to move a case of that kind” in court, Turley emphasized.

    Not only that, but if Sessions believes crimes were committed, but Huber for some reason does not bring charges, “Sessions has reserved the right to go ahead and appoint a special counsel,” said Turley.

    “That’s a powerful combination,” he observed.

    Turley said President Trump should be very happy that Sessions chose this route of appointing Huber, who has the power to seek indictments and prosecute cases, and teamed him up with Horowitz, who has 470 investigators at his disposal, if the president wants to see swift and decisive action.

    “If a special counsel were appointed, there would be a great deal of delay,” Turley stated, versus the team of Huber and Horowitz, who are already five months into this investigation.

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/

    Liked by 6 people

  12. trapper says:

    Everyone see the photo of Kim Kardashian with PDJT in the oval office? Pop culture Hollywood heads exploding all over the place. Master Troller!

    Liked by 5 people

  13. phoenixRising says:

    Liked by 1 person

  14. rf121 says:

    Called it last night. Joe Dan in action.

    Liked by 5 people

  15. phoenixRising says:

    Ben Shapiro flummoxes me… Since when does being a celebrity restrict one from being anything else? I don’ follow celebrities, but some can actually put words together, care about other people.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Drudge has the NY Post front page up: Trump meets Rump The Other Big Ass Summit. Wow. No bullying body shaming there.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. Pam says:

    Anyone remember Joe Dan’s epic tweets last night during the rally? Oh boy, this is too funny!

    Liked by 2 people

  18. ForGodandCountry says:

    You’ve seen it before, now see it in action.

    Here is a liberal NTYs reporter, tweeting about an experience at the Trump rally in Nashville….

    Get this. This exact same “reporter” subsequently submitted (and the NYTs ran) an article stating that there only 1,000 people showed up at the rally……

    ….when it was, in fact, 8-9 X’s as large!

    PDJT called the Slimes out on it…

    QUOTE:
    After the presidential broadside, the Washington Times reported that the New York Times “corrected” their crowd estimate later on Wednesday:

    The New York Times issued a correction Wednesday about the crowd size at President Trump’s rally after the president challenged the paper’s mistake, acknowledging the audience in Nashville, Tennessee, was more than five times larger than The Times initially reported.

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/05/30/new-york-times-admits-it-lied-about-crowd-size-at-nashville-trump-rally-corrects-after-president-calls/

    ————————

    The cognitive dissonance is simply off the charts here.

    Liked by 6 people

    • sunnydaze says:

      Dear Julie Davis,

      Sounds like that boy’s parents raised him right!

      When you’re looking for the Truth, it’s a *good* thing to question what you hear – especially when it’s being handed down to you from “The (self-annointed) Authorities”.

      Of course, I know that’s Very.Upsetting. for someone who makes a living shoveling Propaganda all day long.

      Oh well, sucks to be you, I guess.

      Like

  19. NYVoter says:

    please contact devin nunes, and thank him for the good work he does,
    https://nunes.house.gov/contactform/

    also if you want to donate for his campaign, here is a link
    https://www.devinnunes.com/contribute/

    Liked by 3 people

  20. Pam says:

    Here is Diamond & Silk with Maria B regarding the controversy with Roseanne’s tweet.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. JoD says:

    Moments ago, on Hannity, Joe diGenova made a very interesting statement regarding Harold Gowdy III and his “ludicrous comments in the last 24 hours.” Perhaps, y’all knew this, but I did not.
    In the most recent meeting with the DOJ …NO documents were produced. It was another briefing.
    What?

    Liked by 3 people

  22. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 2 people

  23. Pam says:

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Pam says:

    Liked by 4 people

  25. Pam says:

    Liked by 1 person

  26. Pam says:

    Liked by 3 people

  27. Pam says:

    Liked by 1 person

  28. Dutchman says:

    She had a bullseye on her back, as soon as she voiced her support for DJT. Having the audacity to show that appealing to deplorables might actually be profitable?
    HAD to go, in hollywoods eyes. Like kanye, threatening their cognitive dissonance, may be hazardous to YOUR health. Kinda like the whole second hand smoke thing.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 3 people

  30. Michael Hill says:

    Best article I’ve read since Trump’s election (sorry Sundance). If she’s not a Treeper she should be awarded a lifetime achievement award at least…https://amgreatness.com/2018/05/30/dear-ex-friends-in-the-resistance/

    Liked by 1 person

  31. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 3 people

  32. Pam says:

    Did I say we are winning too much? I was wrong!

    Liked by 5 people

  33. Dutchman says:

    Hmmmm. Life sentence no possibility of parole; seems harsh, something we should change.
    Until you think of something like,…conspiracy to obstruct justice, obstruction of justice, money laundering , public corruption, bribery of gov. Official, etc. All ‘non-violent’ crimes d.c. slimeballs may be convicted of. Hmm funny how quickly my perspective changes!

    Liked by 1 person

  34. LM says:

    My requirements are simple regarding politicians, media personalities, and just about everyone else.

    If they like the President, I like them. If they used to not like the President but now like him, I like them. (Admittedly, I cannot say this truthfully about Glenn Beck).

    I don’t know what to say about Ann except that it looks like she likes the President again, and I had no idea that Harvey Weinstein tried to exact vengeance on those who helped impeach Clinton.

    The vengeance part is easy to accept though, because I have always thought that the bimbos that were paid to testify against the President were bought by the Clintons as pay back, in part, for bringing Clinton’s victims to the debate. The other part of the revenge, for winning the election, is the dossier/witch hunt/impeachment effort.

    http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2018-05-30.html

    Liked by 2 people

    • ForGodandCountry says:

      QUOTE:

      As Bob Herbert wrote in The New York Times, the reaction of the feminists to Clinton’s predatory behavior “can most charitably be described as restrained.” (This was when the Times was still an occasionally serious newspaper.)

      Not one Senate Democrat voted to remove Clinton from office for various felonies related to his sexual assaults.

      The message was clear. Liberal men got a pass for any sexual misconduct, even rape. But woe be to those who accused them. (Even last year, NBC News was still following the old rule: It fired Ronan Farrow rather than publish his Weinstein expose.)

      Liberal males treated progressive politics like carbon credits for rape. Last year, MSNBC’s Kasie Hunt reported that Democratic sexual predators on Capitol Hill say, “I can’t be sexist; I’m a progressive.”

      The liberal protection racket for sexual predators was always intimately intertwined with the Clintons. The template used to defend Bill Clinton became a model for all left-wing sexual predators. They all hired the same lawyers and detectives and counted on the same cultural elites to mete out punishment to anyone who stood in the way of their Caligula lifestyles. It was Total War against the original #MeToo movement.

      It’s hard to avoid the impression that a big part of the reason Weinstein was finally exposed is that the Clinton machine is dead. Trump killed it. Would anyone have called out Weinstein if his good friend Hillary Clinton were “Madame President”? I doubt it. The Clinton protection racket would have gone on and on and on.

      After years of feminists excusing sexual predators, once the Clintons were out of the way, the dam broke. There was no reason to keep humiliating themselves by defending the indefensible.

      The Worst Generation has flatlined. There are no more Clintons to save.

      Liked by 2 people

      • phoenixRising says:

        Worse than you state…
        Hill terrorized the women Bill assaulted… her feminazi friends followed suit.
        Bet you thought progressives care about women.

        Like

    • Carl says:

      LM, I love your requirements. Mine are pretty much the same.

      Like

  35. Dutchman says:

    I.M.
    The bimbos were arranged for, well in advance of the debates. Whole billy bush tape, bimbo eruption as Oct. surprised arranged well in advance.
    Standard uniparty tactics. Used by ‘both’ arms of uniparty, to keep outsiders out. Barstuds!

    Liked by 1 person

    • LM says:

      Dont you think that we Conservatives should embrace those who uphold our values like family? As in, they are ours so we love them…no matter what (unless truly terrible like treason or murder).

      I cannot forget the character assassination of Judge Bork or Judge Clarence Thomas, nor the asininity of smearing him because of “the seriousness of the charges”…with absolutely no verification of truth.

      If stuff comes out about our guys, it is probably because they refused to be blackmailed and give in to the criminal cabal.

      Like

  36. patrickhenrycensored says:

    Even better……….

    video/1

    Liked by 1 person

  37. Dutchman says:

    Godncountry: if you cant do the time, dont do the non violent crime.
    Betting LOTS of support, ‘across party lines’for prison reform in Congress, right now,….between themselves, they are calling it an,…”insurance policy”.
    Its like your 40 y.o., and you get an life insurance policy, see,..
    Snark, pure self interest. Well, not so ‘pure’, more like purile.

    Liked by 2 people

  38. Pam says:

    Like

  39. patrickhenrycensored says:

    Liked by 3 people

  40. phoenixRising says:

    THREAD – click the tweet

    Liked by 1 person

  41. sunnydaze says:

    Liked by 3 people

  42. patrickhenrycensored says:

    Liked by 1 person

  43. sunnydaze says:

    It just gets worse and worse. The Authorities from FBI down to local Sheriffs and School Board, etc. all dropped the ball in Parkland ,FL.

    Cruz’s cell phone vids saying he was going to be the next school shooter:

    http://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/broward/parkland/florida-school-shooting/fl-reg-florida-school-shooting-phone-video-release-20180530-story.html

    Like

    • sunnydaze says:

      He’s kinda saying here that he’s doing it for the MSM attention, too. ..”I’m gonna be famous..”

      Which many have pointed out is definitely a major part of the problem.

      And just like clockwork, the MSM complied and it was Non-Stop coverage, for 48 hrs., even tho they had NOTHING new or “important” to say. Just constant repetition of the same BS.

      Like

  44. G3 says:

    There is no Celebrity worship, Ben Shapiro…at least for them. The discussion was prison reform.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s