Bud Cummins Discusses Spygate…

Fox News Host Trish Reagan sits in for Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures and interviews former U.S. Attorney Bud Cummings on the current issues surrounding the Spygate scandal:

.

It is important to note Democrats in general, and their media allies writ large, are having increasing difficulty obfuscating around direct questions about this scandal. The average American has a very adept BS monitor.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, media bias, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

220 Responses to Bud Cummins Discusses Spygate…

  1. Chuck says:

    “The average American has a very adept BS monitor.”
    Yep, and they are turning out to vote….

    Liked by 39 people

    • Minnie says:

      ⭐️⭐️⭐️

      We are coming out in DROVES 🇺🇸

      Liked by 31 people

      • ForGodandCountry says:

        Setting records for primary turnouts in state after state, district after district.

        FACT.

        Liked by 25 people

        • T.L.T. says:

          Thanks for sharing that, did not know. 🙂

          Liked by 4 people

          • fleporeblog says:

            When the best in the business of polling is saying the following about California, you know it is BEYOND TERRIBLE for the Democrats!

            Liked by 28 people

            • Sayit2016 says:

              Fe– I have been saying for a long time CA can flip– it is that GOP have been convinced they can not win back CA, and they have not even tried. Very little time is spent campaigning here. I think often of that clip with Nunes and Trump, when Trump was asking of he could win in Ca. Seriously funny….

              ” Impossible is just the starting place” ~ Donald Trump

              MCGA- Make CALIFORNIA GREAT AGAIN !

              Liked by 9 people

              • ann hendrickson says:

                washington state could come into play; the DNC’s post election “Resist” militants alienated an unknown proportion of “Conformity Matters” electorate, who, almost reflexively, vote a Democrat Clinton Machine ticket. To paraphrase Sundance, the drip, drip, drip of transparency and public access to primary source documents erodes the moral capitol they used to fracture, divide and exploit.

                Liked by 4 people

                • Dimbulbz says:

                  Not Washington State. They will simply nullify the election, manufacture 500,000 ballots out of thin air (Someones trunk in King county) and the democrat will win. Just like Christine Gregior won back in 2000. The Vote in King county Washington is crap. Pure and simple. Glad I moved from that disgusting Communist Utopia before that happened, I likely would have been put in jail for protesting that election. I brought my whole family to freedom in 1999. Texas! What a glorious free state that I can be proud of. Washington, while beautiful on the surface, is filled with nut-jobs, communists, and people who want whatever you have. God help the sane people of Washington.

                  Liked by 12 people

                • ann hendrickson says:

                  yes. citizens are the ones in need of ‘sanctuary’ in Seattle.

                  Liked by 1 person

                • Sayit2016 says:

                  we shall see how this all plays out… exciting times!

                  Liked by 1 person

              • Belskisfast Lance says:

                We here in California are hostage to the demoncrat machine of voter fraud. It’s beyond belief. Until the vote is trued up nothing will change here. The vast majority of California is conservative just like the rest of the nation, and once freed from the criminal machinations of the left, California will come roaring back as a conservative bastion.

                Liked by 3 people

                • fabrabbit says:

                  Belskis, Sonoma County Concervative here. Considering leaving the state. It’s just too overwhelming here.

                  Like

              • Remington..... says:

                As I recall, t h e last repubs gov.in kalifornia was ..the Arnold.

                Liked by 1 person

              • Ono says:

                Listing to KNX AM ( fifth most popular radio station in the US) radio for traffic updates the other day while driving through LA Ca. and it was reported that over 70 thousand motor voter regristraints had recieved duplicate ballots by mistake. “No need to worry…officals said there would not be an impact on election results”…Right. Who owns KNX. MSM

                The only people who do motor voter regristration are illegals. There is a box that they check that says that they are legal on the form. No check up on any of the forms.

                Horrible

                Liked by 1 person

            • 1popefrancis says:

              I love Trump but your source is clouded in…well you research it…

              Like

            • What?! No! You’re pulling my leg.

              Trump above 50% with Hispanic males?!

              The Blue Ripple in a vast MAGA Ocean…Red Tsunami.

              Liked by 3 people

      • kinthenorthwest says:

        Sadly droves of people with death certificates are voting too, along with people who were not born in America & have no American citizenship papers will be voting too. Then don’t forget how the machines seem to vote too…

        Liked by 7 people

        • T.L.T. says:

          Been thinking about looking into places I’ve lived before, and was registered to vote. See if my name is off the rolls. Liberal states. 🙂

          Liked by 5 people

        • ForGodandCountry says:

          Look at the vote totals.

          GOP is dwarfing dem numbers.

          There can be no question that GOP enthusiasm is WAY above that which the MSM is claiming. (See: trend in Generic Ballot, etc.)

          Heck, even the CA Gov’s race is tight. That alone says it all.

          The “blue wave” is nothing but a chem bar in a swirling liberal toilet bowl.

          Liked by 10 people

        • Christine says:

          I’m quietly confident that prior to the midterms, the DHS will have released its findings into widespread voter fraud (carried over from President Trump’s Executive Order on 11 May 2017 to investigate), with multiple new practices implemented to dramatically reduce voter fraud.

          California will be a walk in the park for the GOP, if its 3-5 million illegal voters are prevented from voting.

          Liked by 2 people

      • Bill Dunn says:

        A RED TSUNAMI, you can book it!

        Liked by 2 people

    • Turranos says:

      … and there will be no big blue wave coming anytime soon.

      Liked by 2 people

    • gerkenstein says:

      If that were the case, Obama would never have been elected. They do not have an adept BS monitor. It’s just that this BS is so obvious and smells so bad that only the brain dead can’t detect it.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Mark L. says:

      The only issue for me is there are clowns on both sides.
      Thank God for POTUS and his Patriots.

      Like

  2. f.fernandez says:

    I can’t ever remember a time anxiously waiting for something big and ugly to show up. I mean outside the MIL. j/k

    Liked by 13 people

  3. RWI schweitzer says:

    I watched live when Clapper stated that in fact there was a spy/? In the trump camp. Why is this still an issue?

    Liked by 7 people

    • Carrie says:

      I know! I saw that clip earlier with Schiff saying he saw no proof of a spy in the Trump campaign and – well, boy I was pretty irritated. I beg PT to just declassify all of it. enough of the lies.

      Liked by 8 people

      • Susan Bolle says:

        It does become difficult to weave through the lies that have been proclaimed, particularly since it involves so many deep state characters.

        Liked by 3 people

        • Ned Zeppelin II says:

          Schifty’s statement was carefully written. There was no informant in the campaign, but numerous approaches at the periphery (Page, Papadapoulos, etc.) by Halper, and Downer, and perhaps unknown others to sow disinformation followed by attempts to entrap. Mr. MIA Misfud may well be Patient Zero, to steal an analogy.

          Liked by 1 person

      • I wonder if Shiff saw proof of a confidential informant.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Donna Wood says:

        Schiff is using a play on words because the spy/informer was not “in” the Trump Campaign. I wish everyone would use the term “reached out to the Trump Campaign” to stop saying “in or connected to” because Dems deny it and are technically right

        Liked by 2 people

      • Thomas Berwick says:

        Of course Schiff saw no proof of a SPY in the Trump campaign. However, he did see several INFORMANTS. It’s all about semantics with these idiots.

        Like

    • snarkybeach says:

      Clapper was the DNI in the Obama administration. The Fourth Amendment requires “reasonable” governmental searches and seizures to be conducted only upon issuance of a warrant, judicially sanctioned by probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized. Where is the crime that allowed them to insert a SPY into a political campaign?

      Liked by 6 people

    • Dixie T says:

      Yep, and he tried to assure us that Obama knew nothing about it!!!!!

      Like

  4. wheatietoo says:

    There’s that term again…”Confidential Human source”.

    CH = Confidential Human

    CH = Crossfire Hurricane

    Isn’t it convenient that these two things have the same initials.

    That way, when we see the scheming conspirators refer to “CH”…they can now claim that they were referring their cute little code name ‘crossfire hurricane’.
    Instead of referring to one of their Spies embedded in the Trump Campaign.

    Funny how that has worked out.

    Liked by 24 people

    • Minnie says:

      Yep, they seem to enjoy their little word games.

      We, in the other hand, stand with Mr. President who call it as he sees it.

      That practice is known as INTEGRITY.

      Liked by 14 people

    • Mike says:

      In general practice in reports the FBI refers to an informant as “CS” which means “confidential source.” When you have multiple informants, referred to in the same report each one typically given a number, like “CS1.”

      Liked by 8 people

    • ForGodandCountry says:

      Liberals are NOTHING is not all about word games.

      Ever since Clinton challenged the definition of “is”, liberals have run with this gambit.

      In fact, this is why they think they are so superior to everyone else. Because of their word play. And for a long time, they weren’t wrong.

      Fortunately, America has awoken to this (and much else in the liberal lexicon).

      Liked by 4 people

      • wheatietoo says:

        Oh the word-game stuff started before lying BJ Clinton’s remark about the “definition of ‘is'”…

        Political Correctness was designed to change our definitions of words, and also to curtain free speech.
        The PC programming started in the late 70s and was established further in the 80s.

        But yeah, Clinton-Gore were big on ‘redefining’ words.
        They definitely escalated it.

        Liked by 7 people

        • rogerdat says:

          ah yes…………the pre-Clinton days, when one was caught telling an untruth and not permitted to claim they ” mis-remembered. “

          Liked by 1 person

          • dutzie60 says:

            I even remember a word that was spelled L I E. It was pronounced lie. It was a good old fashioned word that described an untruth without any vagueness. I think we should bring it back. So to start the come back, James Clapper tells lots of lies. 😜

            Liked by 4 people

        • Comrade Mope says:

          This is Watergate 2.0. The one takeaway from Watergate was “The cover-up was worse than the crime”. These people have forgotten the lessons of history.

          Liked by 2 people

        • Comrade Mope says:

          Spy or Confidential Informant? Heck, let’s just call them “Plumbers”. While we’re at it let’s change the name of Trump Tower to The Watergate Hotel.

          Like

    • lotbusyexec says:

      Nice catch — Love how on top of this “stuff” we all are. Should we start a newspaper called Treeper’s?

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Minnie says:

    Placing a “spy” into the campaign and paying an already established inside contact to be a “confidential informant” are two separate issues.

    There goes schiff again, playing with wording.

    I *SPIT”’on schiff for brains.

    Liked by 14 people

    • Donna in Oregon says:

      I know Minnie. She hasn’t the stuff of Maria.

      I have a soft spot for her tho, I was watching her talk-up Donald Trump (really fighting for him) and right at that moment he was announced as the 45th President of the USA.

      I will never forget it. Never.

      Liked by 8 people

    • wheatietoo says:

      Several of these guys who came out of that Meeting-to-View-Unredacted-Documents, came out and said:
      “We’ve seen nothing to change our view…”
      Or:
      Nothing we’ve seen has changed our view…”

      And now we have learned that they were shown…Nothing.

      So, yeah. More Word Games.

      Liked by 15 people

    • Shadrach says:

      I think a lot of people have an over-sexy view of what a spy is. A spy is a person who is paid to betray their country. The people who run those spies are what most people think of when they think spy, but it isn’t right. We aren’t talking James Bond here.

      Aldrich Ames was a spy paid by Russia to betray his country. He was an “already established inside contact” within the FBI. Is Aldrich Ames now a Russian Confidential Informant? Hardly.

      Like

      • Steve in Lewes says:

        ‘A spy is a person who is paid to betray their country.’
        That’s called a traitor and a spy, but not exclusive to being paid.

        Well, thinking back in a World War II scenario, what would you call a German, pretending to be an American dressed in an American GI uniform, gathering American intel for the Germans in order to anticipate the Americans next operational move. I believe, if the Americans found him out, he would be arrested and shot for being a ………SPY!!!
        A spy is someone who infiltrates an opposing organization pretending to be someone they are not in order to gather intel beneficial to his/her side.

        Liked by 1 person

  6. Carrie says:

    Not to be overly critical – but Trish Reagan is no substitute for Maria Bartiromo. Her tone just reminds me of a stuffed bunny. Sorry.

    Liked by 3 people

  7. Donna in Oregon says:

    They try to bore us to death…..writ large. Personally, this is the most dangerous strategy the Swamp has. Death by boredom….repetition with malice.

    Liked by 4 people

  8. jack says:

    FOX network seems pretty MSM now-a-days with a New Female CEO and all the pretty women anchors on most of the shows now.

    Moving to the Left … a little bit …each …day … gee …

    Please Trump friends who are Billionaires … make a Pro-American … Pro-Trump station and fill it with MAGA anchors and slant so 1/2 the country can tune in a party together as we “WIN WIN WIN” again and we have comedy shows about the Leftist Wacko’s each night. 🙂

    Liked by 8 people

    • Minnie says:

      I believe OANN fits that bill.

      Unfortunately, it isn’t carried by all cable providers but one can access it online.

      Liked by 2 people

      • mimbler says:

        And OAN is pretty limited in its programming and production values. Not enough money there yet, but I do pay my 6 bucks a month to get it streaming.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Donna in Oregon says:

          Yes. I like OANN so much more than any other news source.

          I love the commercial-free theme. Instead of commercials OANN does short documentaries of American history.

          This is the new direction for information. Not Reuters or AP. My dream is that we have less opinions. Fact not fiction.

          Liked by 3 people

    • Dekester says:

      Serious question. Why has this not occurred?

      Up here in Canada we are regulated to death, and it would be impossible to get on the airwaves with a Pro PDJT type channel.

      But in the States, with your massive networks and huge population surely a station that is at least pro American, would be immensely popular.

      Folks go on about OANN but I don’t know of anyone outside of the CTH folks that watch it. Or can even get it.

      The leftists that appear on Fox to “ debate” are just hucksters and we immediately hit the mute or switch channels.

      Surely advertisers would demand the best shows to promote their products.

      God bless PDJT.

      Liked by 7 people

      • donna kovacevic says:

        Dekester! You mean like CBC the Trudope Network. I have not watched it or others except for my 15 minutes of my local News CHCH in Hamilton, Ontario and that is pathetic as well.

        Like

    • Carrie says:

      Maybe Peter Thiel? He could organize an online 24/7 tv format with news and include interviews and various personal interest stories (about courage or ethical choices in society) on the weekends?

      Liked by 1 person

  9. extremely careless is to gross negligence
    what confidential informant is to spy

    Liked by 13 people

  10. AG Bud Cummins has a ring to it

    Liked by 1 person

  11. bkeyser says:

    Just want to note very simply, as it’s finally dawning on people that it’s very likely that other Republican candidates were probed by the FBI during the 2016 primary campaign: The whole story is blown apart like a Fat Man on Nagasaki if we learn this to be true since no Russian “collusion” accusations have ever been levied at any other campaign, and no one outside of the Trump campaign has been targeted by the SC. Proof that even one other campaign was probed, however brief, is evidence that this was a political operation.

    I think that’s what Nunes was told in January 2017, and I think that’s what the DoJ is so desperate to conceal. At that point, it leads straight to the top.

    Liked by 7 people

  12. starfcker says:

    “It is important to note Democrats in general, and their media allies writ large, are having increasing difficulty obfuscating around direct questions about this scandal. The average American has a very adept BS monitor.” Most people hate spinning, especially when they have a choice between clear language and increasingly complicated obfuscation.

    Liked by 6 people

  13. Mike says:

    Spy, informant, “confidential human sources” are all just semantics. Who did what, at who’s direction, matters more than what you call them.

    Clearly if a republican administration did it, the left and the MSNM would be SCREAMING it was the end of democracy. Since Obama did it, they will try to poo poo it, nothing to see here, move along.

    BUT,
    if it can be proven that a paid FBI/CIA informant was directed by FBI/CIA to PLANT a false story (about the Ruskies having HRC’s emails) into a Trump campaign person (Papadopolous) for the purpose of having another paid FBI/CIA informant obtain the planted false story FROM the Trump campaign person, for the purpose of generating a counter intelligence investigation on Trump,
    then there is no way they can successfully spin this.

    Strzok is the guy who was involved in ALL of this. If he testifies that this is what happened, backed up by emails and other testimony, the left and MSNM cannot spin/lie their way out of this.

    I also strongly suspect that if they did this to Trump, they did it to others. Imagine how PO’ed the Bernie numbskulls would be if they found out the FBI/CIA did Bernie too.

    Liked by 5 people

    • G. Combs says:

      I imagine the Bernie guys are STILL P.O.d at the DNC for what they did to Bernie. Many also think Seth Rich was killed for transferring data from the DNC computer to Wikileaks. Finding out your idols (DemonRats) have clay feet and are sleazy and slimy are a real shock to the younger set and I doubt they will blindly trust the DemonRats again.

      On top of that, President Trump going up against the BIG corporations/Chamber of Commerce doesn’t hurt and neither does having jobs open up, and the mess in both the Middle East and N.K resolving. (Getting drafted is always a worry for the military aged/no job types.)

      With luck, Q, the Chans, and The_Donald have changes a lot of minds.

      Liked by 3 people

    • V says:

      A few days ago Deedee said at May 24, 2018 at 5:46 pm:

      “There’s a WaPo article posted on Bongino Sy’s website dated June 17 [2016] that references: Agalarovs, Flynn, Manafort, Page, Papadopulos, and Caputo. They knew in June [2016] and leaked to WaPo exactly who their targets were.”

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/inside-trumps-financial-ties-to-russia-and-his-unusual-flattery-of-vladimir-putin/2016/06/17/dbdcaac8-31a6-11e6-8ff7-7b6c1998b7a0_story.html

      That led me to an amazing Papadopoulos idea. See below.

      Like

      • V says:

        WAPO 17 JUNE 2016 – A LIST OF THE DEEPSTATE TARGETS IN TRUMP CAMPAIGN

        The Aras Agalarov data is innocuous – normal business dealings during Nov 2013 Miss Universe Pageant in Moscow, long before campaign.

        BUT HERE IS WAPO’S VEILED REFERENCE TO THE TRUMP TOWER SETUP:

        “Agalarov and his son, Russian pop musician Emin Agalarov, told The Washington Post that they befriended Trump after the pageant and listened as he described his views of U.S.-Russia relations.”

        This JUNE 17 article is 8 days after the JUNE 9, 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Fusion GPS’s client Russian lawyer Veselnitskaya. It was later discovered that Goldstone’s seemingly contrived-to-ensnare emails pushing for the meeting, relied on the Agalarov acquaintance. Goldstone is not mentioned in the article.

        ____

        Flynn, Manafort, Page and Caputo are also in the article.

        (I didn’t find Papadopulos mentioned in this June article, but the link in the middle of the article, does mention Papadopoulos on 3/21/16.)

        Truly a give-away of deep state’s dirty tricks. They were mixing intel with PR and it’s backfiring royally. If they had valid intel, they wouldn’t have needed to attack via the press. Using the press to attack Trump then, is now exposing their dirty tricks with hindsight. Prisoners stuck in time, they are!

        Liked by 1 person

        • V says:

          MORE ON PAPADOPOULOS:

          Oh my goodness, the WaPo 3/21/16 article above links to Mifsud’s outfit, London Center of International Law Practice, to the staff page of Papadopoulos at lcilp.org/staff/3801-2/ which has been scrubbed.

          But it’s saved numerous times at Wayback, the earliest on 3/16/16:
          The meta data of the original page would show what date the page was created.
          https://web.archive.org/web/20160316155752/https://www.lcilp.org/staff/3801-2/

          Before his current role, George worked as the senior policy and economy advisor for a U.S. presidential candidate

          This was Ben Carson’s campaign which he left in Feb 2016. So, this sentence indicates Papadop had not yet joined the Trump campaign when this staff listing was published.

          Papadopoulos left Ben Carson campaign in Feb 2016.
          Papadopoulos’ wife (or the Guardian paper) states he worked for Mifsud’s LCILP prior to joining the Trump campaign.
          Papadopoulos joined Trump campaign 6 March 2016, mtg with Clovis.
          Papadopoulos is listed as staff at this LCILP by 16 March 2016 or earlier.
          Papadopoulos is reported on by WaPo on 21 March 2016, linking to LCILP.

          Mueller team insists his first meeting with Mifsud was in Rome, 14 April 2016, after he joined the Trump campaign.

          Right there in the first two pages:
          https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f0/Statement_of_the_offense.filed.pdf

          Methinks, deep state wants to hide Mifsud’s early connection to Papadopoulos. It was Mifsud who planted the Russia emails data on him so that it could be “extracted” from him in the London bar by Alexander Downer on or about 10 May 2016.

          One can also wonder if it was in London at LCILP that Papadopoulos was encouraged to go join the Trump campaign by Mifsud.

          And did the Mueller Inquisition force him or pay him to plead guilty on the truth so that the 14 April 2016 Mifsud meeting could be emphasized, instead of the March 2016 earlier contact with Mifsud at LCILP.

          Liked by 1 person

          • V says:

            Research data:

            Papadopoulos then fiancée, now wife’s description of Mifsud’s London Center of International Law Practice:

            https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/18/simona-mangiante-trump-russia-joseph-mifsud-george-papadopoulos

            And contains this: (Not clear if she said it or the Guardian author said it)

            “Papadopoulos had worked at the law centre briefly before joining Trump’s campaign.”

            In this paragraph:

            “At around the same time that she started the job [in Mifsud’s LCILP], in September 2016, Mangiante received a message on the LinkedIn social network from Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos had worked at the law centre briefly before joining Trump’s campaign.”

            Liked by 1 person

          • V says:

            COPY OF TEXT FROM WAYBACK SCREENSHOT 16 March 2016

            https://web.archive.org/web/20160316155752/https://www.lcilp.org/staff/3801-2/

            London Center of International Law Practice
            Peace and Development through International Law and Dispute Resolution
            About | Centres of Expertise | Courses & Workshops | Consultancy | Events | Publications | Forums | Conference

            George Papadopoulos

            George is currently the director of the Center for International Energy and Natural Resources Law & Security at the London Center of International Law Practice. Before his current role, George worked as the senior policy and economy advisor for a U.S. presidential candidate His policy experience also expands into the think tank sector. From 2011 to 2015, he worked as a research fellow at the Hudson Institute in Washington D.C. His research predominantly focused on the geopolitics and energy security changes of both the Caspian and Eastern Mediterranean and their impact on U.S. strategy. George designed the first ever project in Washington, D.C. think tank history on U.S., Egypt, Greece, Cyprus and Israel relations at a symposium: “Power Shifts in the Eastern Mediterranean: The Emerging Strategic Relationship of Israel, Greece, and Cyprus.” The event was widely covered and has provided U.S. policymakers with an alternative approach to responding to the simultaneous political, security and energy changes in the region.

            George has consulted for energy companies operating in the Eastern Mediterranean and Caspian and has written reports on both Israel’s and Cyprus’ upstream natural gas market structure that have been briefed to regulatory authorities. George’s work on the topics has been published and cited in the Washington Times, Jamestown Foundation, Hudson Institute, Jerusalem Post, Natural Gas Europe, Haaretz, Hurriyet, Arutz Sheva and Phileleftheros. He has been awarded by the U.S.
            State Department as a finalist to represent the United States at UNESCO in 2011.

            He holds degrees from University College London, DePaul University and L’universite Catholique de Louvain.
            _______________

            On 8 and 24 April 2016, the above is still there, captured by Wayback.
            Now there is a picture of him added:

            https://web.archive.org/web/20160409125024im_/http://i1.wp.com/www.lcilp.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Screen-Shot-2016-02-23-at-17.16.24.png?resize=227%2C243

            And an email g.papadopoulos@lcilp.org

            By the next Wayback screen capture, 26 May 2016, the page had been scrubbed.

            Liked by 1 person

          • V says:

            Correction re “14 April 2016” should be “26 April 2016”

            TEXT OF STATEMENT OF OFFENSE – Papadopoulos

            https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f0/Statement_of_the_offense.filed.pdf

            Page 2, paragraph a:
            “Defendant PAPADOPOULOS claimed that his interactions with an overseas professor, who defendant PAPADOPOULOS understood to have substantial connections to Russian government officials, occurred before defendant PAPADOPOULOS became a foreign policy adviser to the Campaign. Defendant PAPADOPOULOS acknowledged that the professor had told him about the Russians possessing “dirt” on then-candidate Hillary Clinton in the form of “thousands of emails,” but stated multiple times that he learned that information prior to joining the Campaign. In truth and in fact, however, defendant PAPADOPOULOS learned he would be an advisor to the Campaign in early March, and met the professor on or about March 14, 2016; the professor only took interest in defendant PAPADOPOULOS because of his status with the Campaign; and the professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS about the “thousands of emails” on or about April 26, 2016, when defendant PAPADOPOULOS had been a foreign policy adviser to the Campaign for over a month.”

            _______________

            It really looks like Mueller team was trying to cover up the Mifsud contact with Papadopoulos prior to his joining the campaign.

            Liked by 1 person

    • V says:

      Joseph Mifsud, a Maltese scholar… a member of the European Council on Foreign Relations AND THE CLINTON FOUNDATION…. and UK Intelligence…

      https://disobedientmedia.com/2018/04/all-russiagate-roads-lead-to-london-as-evidence-emerges-of-joseph-mifsuds-links-to-uk-intelligence/

      Looks like Mifsud was working with Downer, Halper and the FBI.

      “”Before the end of the month, Mr. Mifsud had arranged a meeting at a London cafe between Mr. Papadopoulos and Olga Polonskaya, a young woman from St. Petersburg whom he falsely described as Mr. Putin’s niece.”

      “More important, Mr. Mifsud connected Mr. Papadopoulos to Ivan Timofeev, a program director for the prestigious Valdai Discussion Club, a gathering of academics that meets annually with Mr. Putin. The two men corresponded for months about how to connect the Russian government and the campaign”

      “Mr. Mifsud proposed to Mr. Papadopoulos that he, too, serve as a campaign surrogate. He could write op-eds under the guise of a “neutral” observer, he wrote in a previously undisclosed email, and follow Mr. Trump to his rallies as an accredited journalist while receiving briefings from the inside the campaign.

      MY NOTE: That sounds to me like the classic case officer/agent relationship
      Papadopoulos – either witting or unwitting agent.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Mike says:

        Outstanding work V.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Doppler says:

        This is all new to me, V, and appears to completely undermine the coverup narrative that the Trump surveillance was caused by anything other than HRC DNC need to know and Obama’s Administration acquiescence in criminal misuse of law enforcement and intelligence resources. Keep up the good work.

        Like

        • V says:

          Right. This is the planting of “evidence” by agent provocateurs to justify surveillance and attack on Trump campaign and then Pres. Trump.

          A week ago I had these questions:

          Who gave Stefan Halper his instructions to contact Papadopoulos and Carter Page.
          Who did Stefan Halper send his reports to.
          Did Stefan Halper coordinate with Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele.
          Did Stefan Halper coordinate with Alexander Downer / Hakluyt
          Did Stefan Halper coordinate with Joseph Mifsud.

          ___________________

          It is already known that Halper has a connection to Alexander Downer through Hakluyt.
          Since then I’ve discovered a report that Halper has a connection to Steele.

          https://saraacarter.com/concealed-fisa-docs-may-hold-key-to-trump-surveillance/

          HALPER AND STEELE AT SAME JULY 2016 CONFERENCE

          July 11-12, 2016 “Race To Change The World: How the U.S. Presidential Campaign Can Recharge Global Politics and Foreign Policy” conference with Madeleine Albright in Cambridge at the Centre for Research in the Arts, Social Sciences, and Humanities (CRASSH)

          where Carter Page was first targetted and unwittingly made into a “mule” or Trojan Horse for espionage on Trump by Stefan Halper.

          “There were many speakers at the event but [Carter] Page was there as a part of the audience, he said. Former head of the British spy agency MI-6 Sir Richard Dearlove attended, as well as Christopher Steele, who was the former British spy hired by the Hillary Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee in April 2016 to investigate alleged ties between Trump and Russia. Steele was also a graduate of University of Cambridge.”

          Liked by 2 people

      • farrier105 says:

        Great work with a fine collection of leads to when this whole thing actually started. It looks like this phase–probing Trump’s “foreign policy advisors”–started in March 2016. I’m looking for evidence it started in summer of 2015, or as early as April 2015 when Comey had an agent telephoning the DNC to claim they were being hacked. The DNC IT staff and a consultant could find no evidence of anyone hacking that early, but the calls sowed seeds. Why the FBI didn’t just go over there with National Security Letters in 2015 is the interesting question. They used the letters for a lot less and the DNC is a short drive away.

        Liked by 1 person

        • V says:

          Oh, good points! And remember Crowdstrike was on a govt contract in the FBI at that time, just before DNC contracted them through Perkins Coie.

          Like

        • V says:

          “an agent telephoning the DNC to claim they were being hacked. The DNC IT staff and a consultant could find no evidence of anyone hacking that early, but the calls sowed seeds”

          Crowdstrike govt contracts:

          View story at Medium.com

          “According to a US federal government spending database, CrowdStrike’s “period of performance” on behalf of the FBI was between July 2015 and July 2016. CrowdStrike’s findings regarding the DNC server breach… were issued in June 2016, when the contract was still active.”
          (And Crowdstrike was already billing DNC in March 2016 BEORE the DNC leaks. I have that link somewhere, will look for it.)

          http://government-contractors.insidegov.com/l/646676/Crowdstrike-Inc
          (Url has been scrubbed since I last saw it in Oct 2017)

          It showed Crowdstrike’s govt contracts up to 2015 with DOJ.

          Crowdstrike’s Shawn Henry – ex-FBI and friend of Mueller
          Crowdstrike’s Alperovitch – member of the anti-Russia Atlantic Council, where Farkas, Samantha Power, Clapper, Viktor Pinchuk (Clinton Fdn donor) and Soros congregate.

          Like

          • V says:

            farrier105 – Ah, I’ve found the data on Crowdstrike being at DNC in MARCH 2016. I’ll post it at the bottom of this page, since it needs wide text space.

            Like

          • farrier105 says:

            I’ll be blunt. I think these cats stole the emails. It would be easy for them.

            Like

          • farrier105 says:

            I have a Twitter DM out to Wikileaks asking exactly when they had all the DNC emails. I think it had to be June 12, 2016 as Assange tried to tell Britain’s ITV reporter, Robert Preston, but got sidetracked, that he had DNC emails. This was 2 days before WAPO broke it right in the middle of the ORLANDO PULSE SHOOTING STORY. If you read the WAPO article, you read about a “no-big-deal” hack by Russians, benign in nature.

            Like

        • V says:

          “farrier105: “I’m looking for evidence it started in summer of 2015, or as early as April 2015 ”

          Here’s data on 2015 origins in another arena:

          http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/05/deep-state-confession-2017-uk-article-indicates-obamas-spygate-started-in-2015-much-earlier-than-currently-reported/

          Deep State Confession: 2017 UK Article Indicates Obama’s Spygate Started in 2015 – Much Earlier than Currently Reported

          Quotes from:
          https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/13/british-spies-first-to-spot-trump-team-links-russia

          “GCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said.”
          [Who is that source – Halper again?]

          “The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia and Poland. Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source said.

          Another source suggested the Dutch and the French spy agency, the General Directorate for External Security or DGSE, were contributors.”

          Like

          • V says:

            Ha, their multiple sources – Crossfire – are turning into dust.
            Crossfire backfires.

            Like

          • farrier105 says:

            Thanks a lot. This is another gold mine. What got my attention was Comey had people telephoning the DNC about their allegedly being hacked. The IT personnel and a consultant found no evidence of an intrusion/malware after any of these calls and began to suspect they were crank, or social engineering, calls. By the time they caught an “intrusion” on April 29, 2016, which led to Crowdstrike being brought back to run surveillance on the internal network, putting them in excellent position to either take documents, or allow anyone else to take them, from May 5, 2016 to June 11-12, 2016, when they finally claimed to have eliminated the alleged hackers. In their report, Crowdstrike admits they did nothing to stop the exfiltration of data, but just monitored it for 36 days before finally expelling the “hackers.” Strange behavior for cyber security experts.

            Like

    • V says:

      Are Halper and Mifsud sleeping with the fishes?

      FBI’s Embedded Trump-Campaign Spy ‘Vanished’ in Sept. 2017; Is Halper Dead or Playing Dead?
      May 22, 2018

      https://truepundit.com/fbis-embedded-trump-campaign-spy-vanished-in-sept-2017-is-halper-dead-or-playing-dead/

      Paul Sperry
      @paulsperry_
      BREAKING: Hill sources say Halper may have bled into dossier in a positive feedback loop:

      FBI —> Halper —> Steele —> dossier —> FBI
      2:03 PM – May 23, 2018

      _____________

      MIFSUD:
      Joseph Mifsud’s disappearance:

      He disappeared in Rome nine months (thus Nov 2017) after Feb 2017 when he spoke at a US Dept of State sponsored national meeting of Global Ties in the US (speaker list contains quite high-ups in the diplomatic and political world) and ALSO spoke to the FBI while in Washington then.

      http://thefederalist.com/2018/05/15/maltese-professor-may-hold-key-fbi-really-began-surveiling-trump/
      ___

      The “former national security government contractor” “and this other approach” who tried to entrap Michael Caputo, should appear on FOX News for their own protection before they go kaput.

      Liked by 1 person

      • V says:

        Since it’s been established that Halper was on the govt payroll, there should be an FOI request for his emails. I want to know the Halper-Mifsud connection.

        Liked by 2 people

        • V, please repost your research above on the Presidential thread.

          It was posted so late here, that virtually no one has ended up seeing it.

          Like

        • Mike says:

          V,
          I remember reading some where that Mifsud made a public statement that Mifsud had been interviewed by the FBI. Mifsud said he told the FBI that Mifsud had NOT told Papa that the Ruskies had HRC’s emails. The reporter then got a no comment from the FBI.
          Mifsud then went back to Malta and disappeared, according to the article.

          I wish I could remember where I read this.

          I think it is very likely Strzok is the handler of Halper.

          If Papa was telling the truth about Mifsud being the source of the planted info, how convenient for Mifsud to “disappear.”

          Like

          • V says:

            Yes, I remember reading that too. For a while after that I believed Mifsud and didn’t pay any further attention to him, thinking, oh, it’s just the MSM trying to attack Trump on muh Russia. Shows what deceptive liars they are.

            And if Strzok was Mifsud’s handler, then those above him, like Priestap and McCabe knew, too, And DOJ and CIA. Ha, and who took over from Strzok after his removal from his post.

            Like

            • Mike says:

              If Strzok handled Mifsud and Halper, and if Strzok has flipped to the good guys, its OVER. Clapper, Brennan etc’s only defense would be to put it on Strzok.

              Thanks for all the hard work V.

              Like

          • V says:

            3 LONDON VISITS

            Priestap visit to London – approx 10 May 2016, same time as Papadopoulos/Downer bar mtg.

            Strzok visit to London – late July – 2 Aug 2016 – where he had contact with someone at Australian Embassy probably Downer – Re Texts

            McCabe visit to London – Late Oct 2016

            Like

        • Jake says:

          V,
          Thank you for all this very important timeline research. This is amazing. Plus the detail that Steele was also at that Madeleine Albright conference in London with Page and Halper!! This was right after Page had been to the Moscow conference, which Steele would make a big part of the Dirty Dossier. So, on his flight back to the US, Page just happens to stop in London, where all the main suspects are waiting. In my mind I am coming to the opinion that Page was in on this whole set-up.

          Like

          • V says:

            It would be interesting to know who lured Page to the conference. Some reports are that Halper invited him, others that Halper approached him there out of the blue.

            Carter Page is suing DOJ and various media, which makes me believe he’s innocent. But who knows how far people will go to keep their cover.

            Like

            • farrier105 says:

              Comey screwed up when he concluded the Trump list of “foreign policy advisors” was real, and that all those cats were close to Trump, who most likely hardly knew most of them. Page and Papadopoulos were picked because they were ambitious and “on the make” types, hungry to move up. The FBI knew more about Page, too, since he worked for them once.

              Like

  14. Delibero says:

    I strongly disagree with Cummings about SC. (but Kudos to him for speaking out on other matters) It is too late and too important to pussy foot around anymore.

    The fastest and best way to effectively get past the “classified wall” is to appoint a trustworthy and tough as nails Special Prosecutor that will have a top level security clearance and prosecutorial powers. There is clearly an abundance of Hillary and Deep State “predicates” to justify a SC. The GOP politicians that suggest it are mostly ignored even though SC indictments can be made during the investigation and not when it ends.

    The IOG–Huber route is proving to be another lengthy stall tactic and it is has not yet been determined how good or bad a prosecutor Huber will be in this vast and complex case. I wondered if he was considered by some to be one of the least effective and qualified candidates when Session reappointed the Obama nominee. Invisible man Jeff might have been influenced by the DOJ’s coup defenders due to his graduation from the “University of Utah College of Law” rather than elitist Obama’s Harvard.

    However, Orin Hatch gave him a glowing endorsement–“….he brings the independent perspective of an accomplished federal prosecutor who has spent his career far removed from the politics of Washington… the right man for the job. I am confident that Mr. Huber will perform these duties with the utmost integrity, and I look forward to learning the results of his work at the appropriate time.”

    Laboriously turning over rocks, waiting for leaks and endlessly debating is not enough in a scandal of this size with the mid terms near. It’s past time to strike back in full force.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Delibero says:

      When debating definitions has become a major part of the coverage of this despicable scandal, it indicates the coup supporters are still winning

      Like

      • G. Combs says:

        When debating definitions has become a major part of the coverage of this despicable scandal, it indicates the coup supporters are still winning

        Now it doesn’t. It shows desperation.

        Voters may watch but they do not believe ESPECIALLY if they are Republicans!
        Three different polls over the last few years show Americans no longer believe the crap the Yellow Stream Media tries to feed them… Unless they are already diehard liberals.

        Only 6% of Americans trust the media
        Apr, 2016 “[….]A survey of more than 2,000 adults released on Sunday showed that trust in the media has dipped to dramatically low levels. About 52 percent of respondents said they have “some confidence” in the press, while 41 percent said they have “hardly any confidence.”

        Over the last two decades, research shows the public has grown increasingly skeptical of the news industry,” the report from the American Press Institute reads. “The study reaffirms that consumers do value broad concepts of trust like fairness, balance, accuracy, and completeness. At least two-thirds of Americans cite each of these four general principles as very important to them.” […]”

        And more recently:
        60% of Americans believe MSM reports fake news
        “[…]The Monmouth University poll, published Wednesday, found that Republicans (79 percent) were most likely to say that major news outlets transmit fake news stories, compared to 66 percent of Independents and 43 percent of Democrats.
        The survey found that even more people distrust online news websites, with a whopping 80 percent believing such outlets report fake news regularly or occasionally…

        The three groups of respondents were more equally aligned on the topic of whether online news outlets report fake news deliberately, with Republicans and Independents tied at 57 percent. Democrats weren’t far behind, at 52 percent.[…]”

        Poll: Majority says mainstream media publishes fake news
        “[…]Nearly two-thirds of Americans say the mainstream press is full of fake news, a sentiment that is held by a majority of voters across the ideological spectrum.

        According to data from the latest Harvard-Harris poll, which was provided exclusively to The Hill, 65 percent of voters believe there is a lot of fake news in the mainstream media.

        That number includes 80 percent of Republicans, 60 percent of independents and 53 percent of Democrats. Eighty-four percent of voters said it is hard to know what news to believe online.[…]”

        And in the most recent…

        Poll: 77% say media reports ‘fake news’ https://t.co/YzW09XCSEu
        — Jazcox (@jaz2cox) April 6, 2018

        “…According to the latest Monmouth University poll, 77 percent believe the media at least occasionally engages in reporting fake news, and they blame those trying to plant false stories as well as editors.
        That is sharply up from the 63 percent who believed it a year ago….”

        Liked by 1 person

        • Delibero says:

          G. Combs
          I might be proven wrong about the Huber-OIG duo and in fact, I hope I am proven very wrong and also being unfairly pessimistic about the duo getting anywhere close to the highly “classified truth” and to the full extent of the coup scandal.

          But I’m not confident in polls as a reason to be optimistic either and that is not a criticism of your excellent effort compiling the positive and promising poll data. Thanks for your efforts. However, your positive poll data does not reflect how many of these people will actually vote for Trump in the mid terms or even bother to vote at all. Trump voters and those inclined to vote for him like mod Dems and independents will have to be highly motivated to match the obsessed and spiteful voters on the left. (Number unknown)

          Spending hours of media time (overall) debating definitions might not indicate that the coup gang are winning as you stated but it also not necessarily a sign of desperation as you believe. If shocking facts with clear evidence were obtained, definition discussions would be irrelevant. So far the evidentiary truth is still elusive and the coup culprits are still free to spin at will. As long as they can do that they are very happy and making money selling books to the gullible.

          Like

      • farrier105 says:

        They seem to be winning because the MSM always spins their way. It is only an appearance. In substance they should be packing their bags to get on the first thing that smokes to an non-extradition country.

        Like

    • G. Combs says:

      A Special Council allows Congress to stick their nose in the EXECUTIVE BRANCH business. It is NOT needed.

      Both IG Horowitz and DOJ prosecutor Huber have ~ 500 people working for them. BTW IG Horowitz is one of 73 IGs and 47 of them sent a letter of complaint about the Obama Admin obstruction to Congress.

      Horowitz: “….This is an issue of utmost importance, as evidenced by the fact that 47 Inspectors General signed a letter in August 2014 to the Congress strongly endorsing the principle of unimpaired Inspector General access to agency records……”
      https://oig.justice.gov/testimony/t150224.pdf

      SEE ALSO: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/03/29/breaking-ag-jeff-sessions-reveals-name-of-outside-dc-doj-prosecutor-assigned-to-horowitz-john-huber-from-utah/

      And
      https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/03/29/ag-sessions-letter-to-house-and-senate-highlights-a-lengthy-review-by-prosecutor-john-w-huber/

      And
      https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/02/17/byron-york-is-misinformed-ig-horowitz-has-very-wide-investigative-net/

      Liked by 1 person

      • Delibero says:

        G. Combs
        As I wrote in my reply to your 1st post, I hope you’re right and I am very wrong and thanks for your efforts in educating me on some of the facts.

        It will be fantastic if Mr. Huber, a relatively unknown prosecutor from Utah with a Law degree from the University of Utah College of Law humbles and outsmarts the vast cabal of Harvard, Princeton, Yale etc. educated lawyers, that attended more “prestigious” law schools and are now either steadfastly defending the coup participants or eagerly prosecuting and hounding Trump and his associates at will. (Still winning IMO)

        If he is successful, it will be great for America and Mr. Huber’s achievements will make one of the best political movies or mini-series ever. “Mr. Huber Goes to Washington” and plays a crucial part in re-balancing the scales of Washington Justice and in purging the nation of those that would subvert its Constitution and its democracy.

        Like

    • Koot Katmando says:

      Orin Hatch is as swampy as they come.

      Like

  15. lokiscout says:

    AG Joe DiGenova or his wife have my vote.

    Liked by 4 people

  16. Putting On Its Shoes says:

    Bud makes a great analogy with the Dr. Strangelove analogy.

    If you haven’t seen that movie, it is literally an all time great. He is referring to the rogue general that launches a preemptive nuclear attack on Russia via B52, and when it’s found and they try to recall them, they have lost contact with the bomber crew.

    Like

  17. CNN_sucks says:

    Globalists wanted Hillary to win because she is predictable. In other words, easily corruptible and can be bribed.

    Liked by 2 people

  18. L4grasshopper says:

    You know whose picture should be on the side of every milk carton in the country as missing?

    The ACLU.

    Liked by 7 people

  19. Lester Smith says:

    The dems are going to cheat, lie, steal and defraud to take over, DoJ and FBI will not let Dems down. Russia doesn’t have do anything. American subversion will be taking care of business. We can only pray.

    Liked by 1 person

    • spindlitis says:

      You should never trust the postal service when it comes to voting. I had a mail carrier decide that I was no longer getting mail at my address. Same mail carrier that continued to deliver mail to people that hadn’t lived there for years. I requested a replacement ballot but it never showed up. I found out what happened when they returned my paystub to work. The mail supervisor told me it was perfectly acceptable for the carrier to decide that I’d moved. I was the only person getting mail from Hillsdale college there.

      Liked by 1 person

  20. Margaret Berger says:

    Hey Bkeyser,you blew me away with your observation. Bet they spied on everyone. Looked what happened to Herman Kane.

    Liked by 3 people

  21. Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

    Just watched a bit of the late night newscast and the local anchors are still talking about “Trump’s unfounded claims of spying on his campaign”; and of course refusing to mention “Spygate.” And it’s not just one network but all four local broadcast newsrooms (ABC,NBC,CBS,FOX) holding the line with CBS giving air time to dopey Adam Schiff so he could call our president a liar. 😦

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Dutchman says:

    Im missing something. I seriously doubt the fbi had spies in any of the other Rep. Primary contenders, or Bernies campaign, but id bet Hillary did!
    Goes back to Nixon era ‘dirty tricks’.
    Anyway, what im missing is how finding evidence of fbi spies in other campaigns ‘helps’ the pro-Trump narative?
    Firstly, they thought Hilkary would win.
    Se condly, they Had something on MOST the other candidates, at least any that were viable. So, no need.
    They spied on him, and ONLY him, cause they DIDN’T ‘have’ anything on him; he wasn’t a member of the club.
    Neither was Ben Carson, but they didnt see him as serious.
    On a sarcastic note, awhile ago an aquaintance wanted me to partner with him, ‘bootlegging’ CD’S and DVD’S. After seeing what a great job the FBI does, at preventing Russia from interfering in our elections, and responding when someone sees something amd says something, to prevent active shooters, I SURE an glad I turned him down! Sorry, FBI. I know there are good people in every organisation, just Mueller ran most of them out, and used FBI main, in dc, to block investigations. Just trying to lighten the moment.

    Like

  23. Dutchman says:

    By the by, I have sern very little evidence that Ivy league graduates make ‘better’ lawyers or prosecutors than graduates of other law schools.
    Mueller and his team have so far got one defendent to spend 30 days in jail, at a cost of $20 million.
    I think I could do better, for a lot less, and im just an old en proper, (defended myself) ‘jailhouse lawyer’.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Beverly says:

    WHO is the broad in that Fox News clip? she sounds like an MSLSD escapee! She was so Annoying trying to cover the biggest scandal in American history as if it were a nothingburger, that I just turned her OFF.

    And the congress critter was pretty weak in rebuttal: saying “Yeah, we can give them that” when the broad said that the criminal Dems were just Concerned About Collusion[TM]. O rly? In What Universe?

    /spit

    Liked by 1 person

  25. Eyes are the window to the soul, as the saying goes.
    Looking at the eyes of “pencil neck” Schiff, all I see is pure evil emanating from them with a hint of insanity.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. Comrade Mope says:

    We have ‘The Small Group’, or The Committee to Re-Elect the President’s Secretary (C.R.E.E.P.S.) inserting spies or confidential informants (let’s just call them ‘Plumbers’) into The Watergate Hotel (Trump Tower’s cool new code name) and the Deep State is the new Deep Throat.
    Someone get Robert Redford on the blower, I need to sell my screenplay. I’m gunna call it “All the Secretary’s Men.”™ It will be like “All The President’s Men” only different. No Woodward and Bernstein.

    Like

  27. CollusionMyth says:

    The most interesting part to me is when Trish asks Bud” isn’t this (situation) exactly what Russia wanted?” Bud answers “of course it is yes, their interests merged with the Democratic Party interests”. So who’s colluding with who?

    Like

  28. V says:

    Replying further to farrier105 says: May 28, 2018 at 5:49 am

    “… I’m looking for evidence it started in summer of 2015, or as early as April 2015 when Comey had an agent telephoning the DNC to claim they were being hacked. The DNC IT staff and a consultant could find no evidence of anyone hacking that early, but the calls sowed seeds.”
    [2016 re DNC I believe]

    I recall seeing an actual invoice from Crowdstrike to DNC dated March 2016. Must not have bookmarked it at the time. Anyway, this below ties in with your awareness of the sowed seeds:

    2012 Conference – Alperovitch & Shawn Henry – Mueller dinner at exec retreat
    http://archive.is/l5ngG#selection-8829.335-8829.342

    Crowdstrike worked for DNC prior to MAY 2016:
    5 weeks before April 29, 2016 = MARCH 2016

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4376628/New-questions-claim-Russia-hacked-election.html

    “The DNC said it originally hired CrowdStrike in late April last year after discovering suspicious activity on its computer system indicating a ‘serious’ hack.
    But according to internal emails, CrowdStrike was already working for the DNC to investigate whether Bernie Sanders campaign staffers had gained unauthorized access to its voter database.
    That five-week investigation appeared to have wrapped up on April 29, 2016.
    The DNC did not make its first payment to CrowdStrike until early May. Over the next three months, it paid the cybersecurity firm a total of $168,000.

    Alperovitch said the company hooked up monitoring software to the DNC system on May 5, 2016 and it ‘lit up,’ indicating a breach.
    The company immediately determined that the culprit was Russia….”
    ——–
    HA, more likely Crowdstrike itself.

    Like

    • V says:

      More on Crowdstrike – Shawn Henry – Mueller

      Really good research. Includes their MAY 2016 billing. Seems plausible that Crowdstrike was hacking DNC servers from their FBI perch (govt contract July 2015 to July 2016; unknown if renewed).

      http://g-2.space/cs2/

      Guccifer 2.0: Game Over
      http://g-2.space/

      This data has been sent to 150 embassies, so the world knows.

      Like

      • V says:

        Thoughts on Crowdstrike and the US NAVY ships

        Crowdstrike itself could be a national security risk if its anti-malware software is used to hack US Navy ships to collide and create “Gulf of Tonkin” incidents for WW3.

        http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2017/09/how-bout-them-yankees/comments/page/2/

        Like

        • Lester Smith says:

          Dnc clownstrike Dnc, FBI and DoJ think we’re all stupid. The dems take over and all is good. We’ll were not stupid egg heads and your all going down trader’s. It’s our damn country we the people will out vote the dems. Even if they have prisoners, illegals and waking dead as voters. We’re the ones that run the country not you self servicing peeps. Where is Session’s they most have given him the Hoover treatment.

          Like

  29. spren says:

    I’m not sure why so many on this thread are so critical of Trish Regan. I think she is great and watch her 2pm show on FBN just about everyday. She has been a very vocal supporter of PDJT from the beginning.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s