Sketchy Porn Lawyer Threatens People Not To Look Into Financial Background….

Sketchy porn lawyer Michael Avanetti took to twitter today to threaten anyone who might look into his shady financial background:

Apparently this is in response to some research by Robert Barnes who discovered Avanetti filed for bankruptcy in December 2017, claiming total assets of $412K – and then ::poof:: mysteriously three months later, at the same time he takes to the airwaves with Stormy Daniels, he comes into a windfall of $8 million.  SEE STORY HERE.

Seemingly connected, a picture graphic is causing Avanetti great angst:

(Source)

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Taxes, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

357 Responses to Sketchy Porn Lawyer Threatens People Not To Look Into Financial Background….

  1. scott467 says:

    This is interesting information on Mr. Avenatti:

    …………………………………………..
    “In 1999, he earned a Juris Doctor from George Washington University Law School in Washington, D.C., where he worked with Professor Jonathan Turley on constitutional issues relating to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). ”

    “While in college and later in law school, Avenatti worked at The Research Group, a political opposition research and media firm run by Rahm Emanuel (later White House Chief of Staff for President Barack Obama, and Mayor of Chicago). Avenatti worked on over 150 campaigns in 42 states, including multiple gubernatorial and congressional campaigns and Joe Biden’s U.S. Senate campaign.”

    On Wiki, at least until they scrub it:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Avenatti
    ……………………………………..

    Liked by 8 people

  2. maiingankwe says:

    You know, when someone tells another, don’t you dare do this! What usually happens? They do it anyways. What an idiot.

    I am sure the anons from 8-Chan and others are now jumping in with glee. It’s like he just gave them the go ahead. Did I say idiot?

    I should say soulless as well. For anyone to knowingly get in bed with anyone accused of participating in 9/11, needs and deserves to get anything they have coming to them when it comes to law and justice. Let me also include when they finally cross over and have to answer to our Creator too.

    I have never had any respect for him since I first heard him speak, and it was the last time I had ever watched him as well. There is nothing that he has to say that I need to watch. I will read the articles, but that is all.

    Last point. I wonder what his client thinks of all of this? I’m sure she has seen or heard of the tweets. I know he’s more than likely denied all of it to her, but even so, her initial thoughts and what may sit in the back of her mind will still be there. Is she that soulless as well?

    I am guessing here, but I would think she’s traveled further into that rabbit hole than she had expected initially. There is no turning back unless of course she had an ounce of goodness and stood in front of the public and openly admitted it was all a lie and she did it for money. However, she realized it had gone to far, and she knows she is the only one able to rightfully stop it. She should also add she isn’t suicidal. It also wouldn’t hurt to ask our President if he’d be kind enough to send her some bodyguards even though of all she had done against him. We all know he would because he’s that good of a person.

    I can’t imagine her doing the right thing, but it is what she should do before she destroys her whole life completely with a good chance of a prison sentence. It all up to her now, and if she has a conscience, I pray she will listen to it.
    Be well good Treepers,
    Ma’iingankwe

    Liked by 2 people

    • Cuppa Covfefe says:

      I would not put it beyond the Klintoons to Arkancide Stormy and blame Trump (or Cohen, or someone in the administration).

      Ms. Daniels had better watch her pillows, and everything else…

      As Sir Walter Scott wrote, “Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive.”

      And Stormy &co. are tangled to the point they can’t get out…

      Liked by 1 person

      • maiingankwe says:

        I never thought they would try and blame our President Trump, but it is exactly like something they would do. I hope this doesn’t happen, but if it does, I hope it backfires Bigly on all of them.

        Like

    • Your Tour Guide says:

      She went down the rabbit hole a long time ago
      if what’s being said about her sporting the nxvim
      brand is fact.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Perot Conservative says:

    Is my math correct on $8 Million in new income.

    1. $4M in taxes (approximate)
    2. $2M to spouse
    _________________
    $6M + increase in child and spousal support

    (Mama needs some new shoes.)

    Like

  4. Konamon says:

    This is one of six…ways to Sunday. Covert Operation.

    Liked by 15 people

  5. Strateshooter says:

    Be nice to have a trace of that 8 Mill. 😊

    Liked by 3 people

  6. Publius2016 says:

    This is SPOOK 101…the whole Get Trump operation is one SPOOK AFTER ANOTHER…don’t be surprised when it’s revealed that the Squeaker and the Turtle were informed of the counterintelligence operation…too many clues say they knew and knowingly approved…1) was Manafort knowingly wired? 2) is Sessions an Intelligence Asset?? 3) what did Wild Bill and AG Lynch exchange on the tarmac…had to be something tangible to risk a physical meeting…Seth Rich Related???

    Liked by 10 people

    • farrier105 says:

      Seth Rich had nothing to do with the illegal email server at Chappaqua. There are at least three different computer networks tied up in the 2016 campaign. The danger is conflating them:

      1. The DNC Network which had emails from January 1, 2015 to May 25, 2016 published by Wikileaks on July 22, 2016, ten days after Seth Rich was murdered by Unknown Subject(s) for Unknown Reasons. Assange had the emails prior to JUNE 12, 2016 as he referred to having new “emails about Hillary Clinton” during a June 12, 2016 interview on London’s ITV. The source of those “new emails about Hillary Clinton” was not identified as the DNC during the June 12th interview, which is why the entire media was taken by surprise and no one tied Rich’s murder to them until AFTER June 22nd. Earlier, Hillary Clinton was blamed for the murder for reasons other than the DNC emails, but that theory was refuted.

      2. The Hillary for America network which was the source of the Podesta emails allegedly stolen by way of a spearphishing scam. Those were published by Wikileaks in the month of October 2016 with the publications biggest impact being the creation of the Pizzagate movement in November 2016.

      3. The illegal email system used by Hillary when she was Secretary of State. The investigation of THIS network was concluding within days of the tarmac meeting and logically the most likely subject as Comey was deciding Hillary’s fate.

      Liked by 11 people

      • Publius2016 says:

        Please stop with the disinformation…the date of meeting between Wild Bill and AG Lynch coincides with Seth Rich leak! Your synopsis fails to include actual dates: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/06/30/loretta-lynch-bill-clinton-meeting/86555274/

        Btw…everybody knows the Private Server was Approved by Obama…it’s most likely in their agreement for Crooked to serve as SoS…not rocket science…

        Liked by 6 people

        • farrier105 says:

          Seth Rich had nothing to do with Hillary’s illegal private server. He worked at the DNC, not the State Department. He would have no knowledge of the illegal server. The whole question of the tarmac meeting between Lynch and Clinton involves the pending decision about the FBI investigation into the illegal email server used by Hillary Clinton at the State Department. Just because the meeting on the tarmac was June 30th does not prove Seth Rich had anything to do with this.

          Also, it has not been proven that Seth Rich leaked anything, including the DNC emails given to Wikileaks prior to June 12, 2016, and there is no reason to suspect that any alleged Seth Rich “leak” of DNC emails was even known by Clinton or Lynch on June 30, 2016 since there was no prior announcement of the publication of the DNC emails by Wikileaks prior to the JULY 22, 2016 publication of the DNC emails by Wikileaks. Most observers are of the opinion that the upcoming JULY 2, 2016 meeting of Comey with Hillary concerning the outcome of the email investigation was the cause of the tarmac meeting.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Publius2016 says:

            Wikileaks does not publish without verification…once again it is you who conflate private server with DNC leak…second time means it’s deliberate…DISINFORMATION DOES NOT HELP…simple question: what did Wild Bill exchange with AG Lynch? It had to have been tangible/physical…

            Liked by 6 people

            • farrier105 says:

              I will repeat for the last time–Seth Rich was not involved in anything that had to do with the Private Server Clinton used at the State Department. He worked with the DNC, not the State Department.

              The fact that Wikileaks does not publish without verification is not relevant to the discussion. Wikileaks published the DNC emails and emails from the private server which were already public. Therefore, both emails from both servers were verified by Wikileaks.

              The point I was trying to make is, Seth Rich, who was not killed until JULY 10, 2016, and who did not have any knowledge that we can substantiate about Hillary’s use of the private email server at the State Department, could not have leaked anything about it that would prompt the tarmac meeting.

              Seth Rich is accused of leaking the DNC emails. Hillary Clinton was going to be interviewed by JAMES COMEY and others from the FBI about the PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER AT THE STATE DEPARTMENT on JULY 2, 2016, only three days after the tarmac meeting. This could not have been about Seth Rich. That is all I am trying to convey to you.

              Like

              • Publius2016 says:

                Ok…since it’s you last post…let me give you the most important part of the Seth Rich connection…all VIDEO SURVEILLANCE WITHIN A 4 Block radius was lost by DC Police for 6 months!!! (Maybe NSA still has it) In other words, anyone within the vicinity of Seth Rich on the day of his death is unavailable…if there was a real investigation, the police could pull the STARBUCKS AND OTHER STORE SURVEILLANCE…BUT OF COURSE, they (UNIPARTY Deep State Think Tank Black Ops) prefer Seth Rich is forgotten as he WAS THE DNC LEAKER!

                Liked by 5 people

                • farrier105 says:

                  Yes, Seth Rich MIGHT be the DNC leaker, but that doesn’t mean he was the subject of the Lynch-Clinton tarmac meeting.

                  Frankly, I think the Crowdstrike bunch took the DNC emails, but who knows?

                  Like

          • Nambread says:

            I am afraid you are both wrong..you should use the Wikileaks search tool and you will find the answer “mandiant”.
            Pedestal emails-
            There is a lot that you are unaware of..
            Educate yourselves guys..the answers are all there..happy hunting 😉

            Like

          • John Rawls says:

            DNC knew they were hacked at least by the end of April.

            Like

            • Nambread says:

              The dnc were not hacked..the information passed to Wikileaks was via USB..the guccifer 2 persona,was part of the Alfa bank hoax first..then the Fake Dnc hack..

              Like

            • farrier105 says:

              Yes, on April 29th, the day Old Man Sanders dropped his law suit and shortly after Crowdstrike ended their earlier engagement about unauthorized access to some of the software that Mr. Rich managed.

              Like

            • farrier105 says:

              I almost forgot–I interpret the April 29th incident as SOCIAL ENGINEERING. It was a fake hack to provide a reason to get Crowdstrike back on the DNC network who just sat there and watched as documents were allegedly exfiltrated from the DNC network.

              Comey had directed people to contact the DNC and warn them they might be hacked in the weeks following Trump’s announcement in June 2015. The DNC IT people found no evidence of unauthorized access. Since everything about Trump-Russia-Wikileaks was started in April, such as the hiring of FUSION GPS by PERKINS COIE to build the Trump Dossier, something had to be done to get the DNC to bring back Crowdstrike, so a fake hack was used. It’s just a theory, but it fits.

              Like

      • farrier105 says:

        The source of those “new emails about Hillary Clinton” was not identified as the DNC during the June 12th interview, which is why the entire media was taken by surprise and no one tied Rich’s murder to them until AFTER June 22nd.

        CORRECTION: The above should have finished with “AFTER July 22, 2016,” the date Wikileaks published the DNC emails. Sorry for the undetected typo and any resulting confusion.

        Liked by 1 person

        • mitrom says:

          Liberal troll alert!

          Liked by 2 people

          • farrier105 says:

            Why are you defaming me for that post?

            Like

          • Carrie says:

            You can respectfully disagree, but I think it’s good to hear him/her out. We are all on the same side, we want to uncover the crimes. So let’s hear what others have to say, please.

            Liked by 2 people

            • Sharon says:

              Unfortunately, some people cannot respectfully disagree.

              Over recent months, it’s become a rite of passage in the threads to call people names. Sometimes I think it’s simply a way for the name callers to position themselves as an insider.

              Anyhoo – – any time someone has to say “I respectfully disagree……” I always suspect that they announce that because actually find it difficult to disagree plainly and respectfully. If they really were able to disagree in a respectful way, they would most likely just go ahead and do that, presenting an alternate opinion/perspective with facts to back it up. They wouldn’t have to label it.

              Like

      • Carrie says:

        I’m not sure but I think that Seth Rich and the Awans could have leaked DNC emails. Seth Rich gave his pen drive in time to Wikileaks for the version we know and there is yet another hack of even more information that was given to the Pakistani’s who could then sell it off to whomever. The Awans definitely have good stuff or Washingmachine-Schultz wouldn’t be so desperate to get that laptop back. (So frustrating that the Awan case is in slow-motion). With all of these legs on this poisonous millipede to be torn off, it’s a miracle PDJT got so much done!

        Liked by 1 person

        • farrier105 says:

          We are always limited by how slowly the evidence comes out. It could be Rich, Crowdstrike, the Awans…Who knows for sure? I just don’t think the Russians did it for several reasons.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Shadrach says:

            The DNC server emails were collected by a person on-site, as you say. Anyone who wants to verify this statement can refer to Binney or Kim Dot.com regarding the transfer speed.

            The Awans worked for Congress, and the link between them and the DNC is Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. They could also have given them to Wikileaks, sure. But why, when they would have retailed for much more than $0.00 in Pakistan. Plus, would we know about the Awans if it weren’t for leaked emails? They must have been super-pissed their money spigot turned off.

            The question is always “qui bono”

            Incidentally, HRC transferred her emails, which included classified materials, via Platte. Did anyone there hold clearance? Why isn’t anyone in jail for this?

            Like

            • farrier105 says:

              The transfer speeds recorded on July 5, 2016 are a potential problem for verifying how a transfer was made prior to June 12, 2016. The questions that need answered, and I attempted to get those through Twitter from Assange, are the following:

              1. Did Wikileaks get all DNC emails in one drop or in two? We know Assange had either some, or all, by June 12, 2016 because he described the emails to Robert Preston on ITV on that date, but could not give the source as Preston, who was convinced these were the missing State Department emails, did not give Assange the opportunity to give the source of the emails.

              2. If Assange got all of them by June 12, 2016, the download of July 5, 2016 is not relevant to the transfer of DNC emails to Wikileaks. The incident does suggest that Crowdstrike people have problems discerning the meaning of download speeds and this bears on their knowledge in some areas of forensics.

              The Awans are logical suspects as Wikileaks pays for data like the DNC emails. A huge number of those emails are worthless, however, which is one of the problems with attributing the theft to intelligence agents from any country. Why steal junk and make the juicy emails harder for average Americans to access?

              No one at Platte River had security clearances. The interesting thing about this is they were aware of the nature of the documents they were told to overwrite until they could not be recovered. From there, Stone Tear, as he called himself, figured it was a cover-up. No one was even indicted to my knowledge and most of the inquiries were Congressional Hearings like Benghazi.

              Our logical suspects are:

              Crowdstrike–the FBI contractor with unlimited access to the network behind the firewall.

              Awan Brothers–Cash in and get even with Wasserman Schultz.

              Deep State hackers in general, permitted to loot the place by Crowdstrike as accessories.

              Insider with high level privileged access or a group of insiders that includes one with privileged access. The problem here is Crowdstrike would likely not permit rogue leakers from stealing emails with flash drives, and activity allegedly detectable by their network surveillance software.

              Like

        • Different systems – DNC server (Seth Rich) vs. Congressional servers (Awans) – not connected.

          Liked by 2 people

          • farrier105 says:

            There is a problem with attributing any local download to Seth Rich acting alone.

            1. Crowdstrike was on the network between May 5 and June 14 (at least). Wikileaks had all of, or a significant portion of the emails before June 12, 2016. To take the emails out of the email server with a flashdrive without being detected by the endpoint protection in the FALCON OVERWATCH software used by Crowdstrike is a huge problem. Crowdstrike would literally see Rich plugging the flash drive into the USB port. Crowdstrike would have to ALLOW the theft, which they actually did, according to their own report. For 36 days they “monitored” alleged Russian hackers taking everything in sight and doing nothing to stop it. However, Seth Rich would be a rogue agent in such as case under the theory that Seth Rich stole the emails for whatever motive, whether Sanders being cheated, patriotism, or being paid by Wikileaks. I can’t see Crowdstrike letting just ANYONE steal the emails. They would steal them, or the FBI could steal them, but not just Seth Rich. If it was Seth Rich, there has to be more to the story than his acting alone.

            2. We do not know the transfer speed of any download prior to the July 5, 2016 download analyzed by William Binney, but there had to be one prior to June 12, 2016. We need to see that one.

            3. The Awans could have hacked remotely. They have the skills.

            Like

            • farrier105 says:

              I forgot two things that might be important regarding Seth Rich. The first is that we know from Craig Murray’s statements that someone was still passing Democrat Party documents to Wikileaks in September, after Seth Rich was killed. So, it is logical to suspect that, IF Seth Rich was involved in passing the emails to Wikileaks, there might have been others involved, perhaps including those with access to steal the emails and give them to Rich to take to Wikileaks. A possible scenario, which is dependent upon how the DNC backed up their system, is that someone in IT, involved in producing periodic back ups, stole the emails during the backup process. This could help conceal the theft from Crowdstrike’s surveillance software. If the DNC backs up to the cloud, you have another set of possible co-conspirators in the Cloud provider of backup.

              As to Rich’s murder, the attorney for the attempt to sue the DNC for cheating Sanders told interviewers he intended to use Seth Rich as a witness. A couple of people involved in the attempted litigation died during the process, including process server Shawn Lucas.

              Like

    • VeritasVincit says:

      Are you reading a lot of “Q”? He’s good at asking but not telling or verifying.

      Like

      • Publius2016 says:

        The three questions I asked are pertinent to the “Get Trump” Operation…Manafort was at the “Russian Collusion” meeting with Don Jr…most likely Corey never approves it…either way…there is audio and most likely video too…Don Jr was very smart to release everything immediately!!! 100% SETUP

        Liked by 2 people

        • farrier105 says:

          Manafort was the only one at the Veselnitskaya meeting who took any notes, which he did on his phone.

          Like

          • Michael says:

            You know this, how?

            Like

          • Publius2016 says:

            Wow! More disinformation…there were several people at the meeting including Jared Kushner…as per the released testimony and emails…

            Liked by 1 person

            • farrier105 says:

              Here is my source.

              Like

              • Michael says:

                You offer the above as evidence, can you summarize the 3hrs?

                Like

                • All three videos by the same guy: SonofNewo. He provides links to a bunch of documents under the video but I am not going to waste my time on this – anyone with an ounce of sense knows it was Seth Rich who took the DNC data – his own family has now even admitted it.

                  Like

            • Methinks it is this “SonofNewo” himself or one of his supporters.

              Like

              • farrier105 says:

                No, I am not SonofNewo. SonofNewo is an attorney. I’m a retired IT auditor. I like his research, which is as thorough as Praying Medic or Tracy Beanz, two researchers in the QAnon community. SonofNewo believes Seth Rich stole the DNC emails, but I am not convinced that was how it was done, but it wasn’t the Russians to help Trump win.

                Like

                • Got it! Thanks. Assange as much as said it was Seth Rich without actually saying the name. Sure wish PDJT would meet with Dana Rohrabacher who claims to have gotten the proof from Julian.

                  Like

      • The Raven says:

        You must not keep yourself up to date on the proofs…

        Liked by 1 person

  7. visage13 says:

    I want to know what #basta is? Anyone know? Thanks. Yes, he is blocking people on Twitter apparently he is allergic to sunlight

    Like

  8. imkittymyers says:

    Speaking of unaccounted for wealth… I read this interesting bit in American Thinker this morning: “The constant and unparalleled barrage of negative press coordinated against Trump has its foundation deep under the muck and slime of the swamp which is comprised of elected criminals in a cartel known as Congress and buttressed by an out-of-control, venom-spewing media. In 2015, the most recent year for which the digital news outlet Quartz could access the information, the median worth of a member of the U.S. Congress was $1.1 million. That is more than 12 times greater than the net wealth of the median U.S. household. The median net worth of a senator was $3.2 million, versus $900,000 for members of the House of Representatives. Obviously, this wealth was not amassed through the interest gained on a savings account, and so the illicit dealings within the swamp going on for decades are very lucrative and will not cease on their own.”

    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/05/liberals_cant_break_a_tough_and_focused_trump.html

    Liked by 11 people

  9. SSI01 says:

    Anyone with knowledge of how diplomacy is actually conducted knows the important information, and steps flowing therefrom, occur on the sidelines at conferences, summits, and so on. It never happens over a conference table in full view of the public. That’s all posturing for the cameras and the media. The real accomplishments occur off the camera, on the sidelines, during breaks in those same conferences and summits. In other words, in the shadows. Anyone who believes this guy Avanetti attended those racing events, in any capacity whatsoever, and talked nothing but racing 24/7 with guys like the ones in that photo spread is incredibly naive. That event is the equivalent of the conference table I was referring to earlier. It’s for the consumption of the easily gulled and those who take things at face value. There was LOTS to discuss before the events and after they were over – and in between. They get down time in these races – hours of it – and a lot can be accomplished out of the public eye. It was a convenient excuse to see each other – for other reasons.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. ringoagogo says:

    Light him up!

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Bulldog84 says:

    I’m confused — why are there bankruptcy proceedings in both Florida and California?

    Liked by 1 person

  12. H&HC, 2nd-16th says:

    Luigi, my barber, said Avennati is like canned spaghetti sauce – “He ain’t da real ting”. End of discussion in the barber shop.

    Liked by 5 people

  13. Gary says:

    In a just world the DOJ would be one this guy. In Obamas’ Amerika, not so much.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. mikey says:

    Prince Turki looks like Clapper with a tablecloth on his head.

    Like

  15. tav144 says:

    Time to raid Sketchy’s office.

    Liked by 1 person

    • kenji says:

      And wherever he lives … although in his recent bankruptcy statement … he listed $0.00 in real property. So the FBI will have to raid one of his current nomadic haunts.

      Like

  16. Daniel says:

    Apparently this twitter user hasn’t heard of the “Streissand effect.”

    Like

  17. jbrickley says:

    $8 Million wasted. If this is all they’ve got? Let them spend, spend, spend. Never ceases to amaze how they can light money on fire like that. I suppose it’s someone with money to burn. But that is just crazy talk to anyone rational. Heck, even Kimmel is backtracking on the Trump bashing as it is finally starting to hit him where it counts, in the wallet. His ratings must have taken a large hit. Personally, I find Jimmy Fallon to be a lot funnier and more entertaining. But even he got in on the Trump bashing after it was quite funny in the beginning and RealDonaldTrump even appeared a couple of times.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Daniel says:

      It’s a sign of intelligence or lack thereof. If you hit it with a rock and it doesn’t die, some think they should keep hitting it with a rock until it dies. Others, meanwhile, will learn why hitting it with a rock doesn’t kill it and try other methods.

      All that to say I see the same pattern with leftists out there who think the reason their tactics haven’t been working is that they haven’t done it enough or gone far enough. It never occurred to them they are the reason Trump was elected.

      If they didn’t fight him so much, he might not have actually won the nomination and might not have wonder the general election. The relentless attacks made Trump into an underdog for many people. The relentless claims and insults made people want to watch his rallies in hopes of him doing or saying something which justifies the claims. It all got people watching and listening and eventually agreeing with Trump.

      They simply just don’t get it. They are truly a LOT like Ben Shapiro in that sense. Like Ben, they think they are 100% right and that’s the most important thing.

      Like

    • uvaldegirl says:

      When you are siphoning the odd billion from the Iran payment and who knows what else, that’s a big slush fund.

      Like

  18. cja says:

    Timing is everything. I wonder if the windfall was before or after the crowdfunding?

    Like

  19. L4grasshopper says:

    Why a tool like this guy for Stormy? Oh right…..has his role, but then is disposable.

    Wonder if the tool understands this 🤔

    Liked by 1 person

  20. Sunshine says:

    Good news this morning. Avenatti’s turn to be under the microscope. BTW: Great mouse pic.

    Like

  21. brenrod says:

    The real reason Mueller and FBI SDNY had Cohen office raided?

    “Mr. Gleason used the letter to request a protective order on all correspondence that Mr. Cohen may have had regarding the women to protect their identities as sexual assault victims.”

    Corrupt Mueller and FBI SDNY raided Cohen office to seize evidence against Schneiderman and to see what Cohen had on Schneiderman. Schneiderman was a lynchpin in the war on trump directly and on Trumps power to pardon fed crimes.
    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/may/13/donald-trump-michael-cohen-knew-of-eric-schneiderm/?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Corrupt Mueller and FBI SDNY raided Cohen office to seize evidence against Schneiderman and to see what Cohen had on Schneiderman.
      Yep. Mueller needed Schneiderman to help with the framing of PDJT of any type of crime. I strongly suspect, based on the MO of the cabal criminals, that Mueller lied to the FBI SDNY so that they’d agree to the raid. The purpose of the raid was to protect Schneiderman so that the case against PDJT could continue in NY state.

      Like

  22. Clara says:

    I don’t understand why people don’t start calling Stormy Daniels what she actually is — a sexual predator. By definition, all “porn stars” are sexual predators to one degree or another. They use their sexuality to prey upon vulnerable men and take from them something — e.g. money, power — that they otherwise would not have access to. Stormy Daniels is the ultimate sexual predator, since she goes further, by preying upon wealthy men when she’s not on stage, then extorting them for money.

    Stormy Daniels is a sexual predator and an extortionist. Let’s start calling a spade a spade.

    Liked by 5 people

  23. 1LanternInTheWindow says:

    $8 million to represent a storm that has blown out! Now thats a high priced call girl.

    Liked by 4 people

  24. Carolina Kat says:

    There’s serious lefty-troll panic on this story at Daily Caller. Trying to change the subject. I think President Trump has the goods on ole Avenatti and is just giving him and the media enough rope to really shatter their credibility before he kicks the chair out.

    Avenatti owned Tully’s coffee; while receiving and selling the coffee he did not pay for and later filing bankruptcy where did that money go? His lifestyle must be something else. (BTW, the owner of a coffee roasting company driven from business because Tully’s (Avenatti) failed to pay has since ‘settled’ once the information hit Twitter. Someone is trying to snuff out Avenatti’s controversial past before it all gets bad.)

    Struck a nerve.

    Liked by 2 people

  25. Bendix says:

    A single reporter looked into this character’s background? ONE?
    Isn’t it just due diligence, if they are going to cover this guy, to find out who he is?
    Why would anyone not think someone involved in something so smarmy would have a shady background?

    Liked by 2 people

  26. rudy1876 says:

    Well folks, you heard it from the man hisself. “Keep pushing….”

    Like

  27. Caius Lowell says:

    A little something from NBC “News”…
    Stormy Daniels’ lawyer Michael Avenatti is ready for his star turn https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/stormy-daniels-lawyer-michael-avenatti-ready-his-star-turn-n867771
    Talent agencies are circling Avenatti, who has become a mainstay of cable news.

    Liked by 1 person

  28. BurmaShave2 says:

    Mr. Avanetti apparently feels that making personal attacks is his stock and trade.

    He feels that anyone making personal attacks on him is encroaching upon and violating his personal attacking franchise.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. Meatzilla says:

    Stop me if you’ve heard this one before –

    A sinister Pimp, a gregarious Whore, and a gay Fluffer walk into a bar. . .

    Liked by 7 people

  30. Atticus says:

    Gift from Pappa Soros?

    Like

  31. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Liked by 4 people

  32. Here’s the thing about shysters such as Mr. Avenatti (as well as Ms. Allred and Ms. Bloom): If they’re trying their case in the media, then they don’t have one that they can try in court.

    Liked by 1 person

  33. jpatrick says:

    I’m shocked….shocked to see gambling going on here!
    Here’s your winnings sir!
    The look on Rick’s face is precious!!

    Let’s make the turn here and SHOW IT ALL!!
    ALL files and ALL money trails……EXPOSE THEM!

    Like

  34. wholy1 says:

    Is this just another example of low-life BAR-fly LIEyers?

    Like

  35. SO…….

    Everybody notice that the word has gone out from the DNC to stop bashing Trump in the media? I’m seeing it everywhere, all at once.

    Liked by 1 person

    • The only explanation is that their internal polling is telling them that they’re alienating themselves from voters. Many people support PDJT’s policies and the enemedia bashing Trump bashes all of his supporters and/or those that approve of his policies. This is not their desired outcome. I think it’s too late though.

      Liked by 2 people

      • All the Trump bashing by the media hasn’t even made a dent. The media has lost control and can no longer influence public opinion, except in the opposite direction they intended for it to go. You’ll start to see Democrats calling for Mueller to “wrap it up” soon.

        Liked by 4 people

    • Shadrach says:

      I actually heard my local radio station (almost as liberal as San Fran) ask whether it was time to wrap up the Mueller probe. I almost had a heart attack.

      But I was saved from crashing into the semi in front of me when some politico they were interviewing said “Mueller has charged 19 people….blah blah blah” and failed to mention 13 of the 19 were the Russian Bot Farm Fantasy, or that the rest were also involved w/ HRC in some form or fashion. (Excepting the SA guy…..vanderwhattisname whom I don’t know enough about to say, and Flynn who should never have been charged).

      Like

    • Retired USMC says:

      Looks like the late night commiedians got the message the other day…

      Like

  36. Donna in Oregon says:

    Someone should turn in this Pimp to the IRS for an audit. Tracing his Go Fund Me account should occur.

    Then we should be able to figure out who done it. 🙂

    Like

  37. Miss America says:

    As I stated previously…..this shady lawyer is
    actively threatening the POTUS. Moreover, he feels he can do so with impunity.

    Someone powerful is behind this.

    And why does hardly anyone discuss that Stormy is blackmailing/extorting the POTUS?

    Like

  38. brenrod says:

    Here is some interesting additional info on Mueller and Russian oligarch Deripaska:
    http://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/387625-mueller-may-have-a-conflict-and-it-leads-directly-to-a-russian-oligarch
    In 2009, when Mueller ran the FBI, the bureau asked Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to spend millions of his own dollars funding an FBI-supervised operation to rescue a retired FBI agent, ………
    FBI agents courted Deripaska in 2009………..
    One agent who helped court Deripaska was Andrew McCabe…….
    Deripaska’s lawyer said the Russian ultimately spent $25 million ……
    At the last minute, Secretary Clinton decided not to make the agreed-on statement.”…….
    The FBI rewarded Deripaska for his help. …………….
    Then, over the past two years, evidence emerged tying him to former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, the first defendant charged by Mueller’s Russia probe with money laundering and illegal lobbying…………………….
    Mueller’s indictment of Manafort makes no mention of Deripaska,………………..

    Like

  39. Retired USMC says:

    Looks like Mikey is learning first hand about the old saying…Play with the bull, you get the horns..

    Like

  40. CNN_sucks says:

    Interesting. I guess everyone has the middle eastern connection, these people like Avenatti are so cheap they can be bought off by oil money.

    Like

  41. CNN_sucks says:

    Avenatti turns out to be a first rate SLEAZEBALL. You got your money. Get lost. Nobody watch CNN only deluded leftists paranoid.

    Like

  42. jello333 says:

    Hey Michael, just so you know…. bankruptcy fraud, even when on a small scale by a “little guy”, is pretty serious. Can easily land you in prison. But you play the game YOU seem to have played, trying to hide MILLIONS?… well, I wouldn’t wanna be you.

    Like

    • jello333 says:

      And by the way, while it’s true that earnings made AFTER you file for BR don’t have to be declared, there’s more to it than that. The forms ask in various spots if you expect any big changes in your income or debts in the near future. On top of this, of course, is if you’re already owed something that you haven’t yet been paid for. If you don’t disclose something like that, it’s just as bad as literally hiding money/property you already have. The only way Avanetti is in the clear is if he can honestly make the court/trustee believe his “$8 million windfall” was totally unforeseen.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s