Senator Lindsey Graham Discusses The Curious Susan Rice Email…

Senator Lindsey Graham (U-DC) appears on Fox News to discuss the curious Susan Rice email to herself on inauguration day. “by the book”

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, FBI, media bias, President Trump, Spying, Susan Rice, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

349 Responses to Senator Lindsey Graham Discusses The Curious Susan Rice Email…

  1. ladyliberty11 says:

    Amazing. Lindsey Graham. Never have been a fan. But, you sir, spoke the truth. When push came to shove, you are a Patriot, sir. Bravo.

    Liked by 23 people

    • fleporeblog says:

      He is a RINO but tonight he was our RINO! Lindsey has his moments! Our President is still pushing his and a Bill Cassidy’s Bill and will use reconciliation with the 2019 budget to finally get rid of Obamacare.

      Liked by 22 people

      • RedBallExpress says:

        Most of our “leaders” need to be led around. It has been that way throughout history.
        In other words they are a leaf in the wind.

        Liked by 7 people

      • olderwiser21 says:

        Uniparty – District of Columbia – am I right? (U-DC)

        Liked by 8 people

      • jonhabart says:

        Like many DC Swamp Creatures Lindsey has his masters when it comes to policy & legislation, but is free to actually serve the interests of the American people on select matters. At this stage of the game I’m happy with whatever help we can get.

        Liked by 1 person

      • tdaly14 says:

        No Fleporeblog, he’s our SC Rino. 😎 Every once in a while he comes thru, just wish he wasn’t such a Gramnesty and so hard to get rid of. I’m telling ya, Lindsey doesn’t care what our concerns are. Made us so proud when candidate Trump pulled out his phone number and said, let’s call it, shall we. That’s when I knew he was going to be our President! We can’t stand Gramnesty.

        Liked by 3 people

        • southernsue says:

          graham
          is like manchin from wv
          fence sitter
          does nothing for his voters
          in fact manchin voted out his people’s jobs,mining, in wv, lock step with all the demon rats,especially hillary stating that she was going to close down mining

          we need patriots
          not rinos and demons
          vote them both out

          Like

      • tdaly14 says:

        No Fleporeblog, he’s our SC Rino. 😎 Every once in a while he comes thru, just wish he wasn’t such a Gramnesty and so hard to get rid of. I’m telling ya, Lindsey doesn’t care what our concerns are. Made us so proud when candidate Trump pulled out his phone number and said, let’s call it, shall we. That’s when I knew he was going to be our President! We can’t stand Gramnesty.

        Liked by 1 person

      • tdaly14 says:

        No Fleporeblog, he’s our SC Rino. 😎 Every once in a while he comes thru, just wish he wasn’t such a Gramnesty and so hard to get rid of. I’m telling ya, Lindsey doesn’t care what our concerns are. Made us so proud when candidate Trump pulled out his phone number and said, let’s call it, shall we. That’s when I knew he was going to be our President! We can’t stand Gramnesty.

        Liked by 1 person

      • doug says:

        ^ This – Graham (my senior senator) has his share of moments where he’s doing what’s right.

        Problem is, when he’s wrong, he’s incredibly wrong – like immigration.

        Liked by 3 people

    • Uh, whatever says:

      Wazzup with that? Miss Lindsey suddenly grow a pair now that Juanita McStain is out of the picture? I don’t trust Lindsey for a second…

      Liked by 8 people

    • Carrie2 says:

      Graham is not the smartest whatever so I believe it was Grassley writing up the questions and all Graham wants to do is be constantly on stage taking over where McCain left off. Doesn’t like Trump but wants to be noticed.

      Liked by 4 people

    • scott467 says:

      With Lady Graham, it is always wise to wait for the other shoe to drop.

      Liked by 4 people

    • southernsue says:

      maybe graham has learned that his buddy mccain is dirty beyond belief and is going down,one way or another

      plus, i think graham is up for reelection

      Liked by 1 person

    • BigMamaTEA says:

      Sorry gang, butting in here to post . Here is the Susan Rice email to herself

      Like

      • BigMamaTEA says:

        This meeting( Jan 5 ?) took place the DAY BEFORE Comey and the FBI visited Trump Tower to brief the president-elect on the investigation and the dossier

        Like

      • zimbalistjunior says:

        another big point is in last paragraph: Obama tells Comey to brief him ‘in the next FEW WEEKS’ if anything changes.
        In theory, that includes Comey briefing him after the inauguration. Meaning, we should check whether Comey travelled to the Obama house post January 20, 2017.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. rf121 says:

    So Rice writes an email to herself about a meeting with the President as “notes”. But she does it over two weeks later because she must have delayed onset memory? On inauguration day no less. Must have been depressed. My B.S detector is going off!

    Liked by 28 people

    • covfefe999 says:

      Obama and his dirty team must have been sweating. ” Quick! What can we do before we’re kicked out to cover our butts????” They saw signs that their plans were beginning to unravel.

      Liked by 18 people

    • Patsy says:

      15 minutes after DJT was sworn in. Obama out.

      Liked by 7 people

      • tav144 says:

        IMO that was so that it would not be scooped up as Obama presidential records (and moved / hidden at the Obama library after inauguration).

        No, she did this for the express purpose that it would be found by the new administration and provide “deniability” for Obama while throwing all the others under the bus (who were without a doubt doing exactly what he told them to) should it all blow up in their face. Had it never gone further and Trump be impeached, the letter would never have been noticed.

        Liked by 7 people

        • MVW says:

          As I understand it, the meeting on January 5 was not on record. So, this memo establishes the meeting existed… Or it is a lie… to herself… Huh?

          A lie, or another lie, what is with these crooks and traitors?

          No wonder Obama had a portrait painted of himself buried deep in the weeds.

          Liked by 5 people

          • tav144 says:

            Well it was done on a government computer as the national archives had the copy that Grassley received.

            Do you remember Judicial watch trying to get something that was during the Obama administration and they were told that it was part of the Obama presidential records and was not available to the public until after 5 years passes? That’s why imo,she waited until just past the Obama administration and into the new administration.

            Liked by 3 people

          • tav144 says:

            Well it was done on a government computer as the national archives had the copy that Grassley received.

            Do you remember Judicial watch trying to get something that was during the Obama administration and they were told that it was part of the Obama presidential records and was not available to the public until after 5 years passes? That’s why imo,she waited until just past the Obama administration and into the new administration.

            Liked by 1 person

          • Can the house house sign in log be viewed for that day to see if they were even at the white house?

            Like

    • RAC says:

      Inauguration day, the coin finally dropped, they woke up and realized it wasn’t their worst nightmare, it was real, PDJT was the president. People do weird things when they’re in panic mode.

      Like

  3. Judiciary says:

    It sounds like Ms Rice was giving her boss plausible deniability as to his involvement in the Trump-Russia collusion story.

    Liked by 23 people

  4. litenmaus says:

    I’m impressed. Lindsey Graham was able to pack a whole lot of info into a short amount of time…kudos to him and to Fox for letting Graham speak, uninterrupted.

    Liked by 18 people

    • luke says:

      Idk…..I’ll take his help but me thinks Lindsay should have a question or two for his good buddy. Mr Graham might learn something from John if he was really curious.

      Who knows maybe he has talked to him?….now I’m just being naive.

      Liked by 2 people

      • AH_C says:

        According to Q, McVain is about to get very uncomfortable.

        Good!

        I hope the last thing McVain remembers, before shuffling off into the aether, is that we know of his treason and damned him. Knowing his nastiness, we Hobbitses are his White Whale, as he stabs at us with his final breath.

        Liked by 5 people

  5. covfefe999 says:

    Graham makes a good point at the very end. Why would they be talking about doing things by the book … on January 5 (i.e., just 2 weeks before the end of the Obama presidency)?

    Susan “dindu nuffin” Rice psy-ops again. Susan, please, we’re not stupid.

    Liked by 22 people

  6. zimbalistjunior says:

    so you are saying he didn’t order the code red..gotcha

    Liked by 12 people

  7. fleporeblog says:

    Senator Graham is a RINO but on nights like tonight, he is our RINO. He actually had me laughing throughout the interview. At some point, Barry and his minions are going to get that BOOk 📖 slapped right across their face. I love what Graham said about how did Comey answer that question about making sure it was done “By the Book”.

    This tells me that Barry and his Bitches are scared out of their minds! Over 50%+ Americans now believe that his administration spied on the Trump Campaign. The same percentage are calling for a second special counselor. That percentage will only grow as soon as the IG report is released.

    There is no way in hell that Barry is going to get away with claiming he wanted everything done by the book 15 days before his sorry ass was evicted from the WH. If anything, this will show how guilty he was as well as his bitches. Sorry Barry, we are going to Throw the Damn Book At You During Your Sentencing!

    Liked by 23 people

    • webgirlpdx says:

      Both he and Mo looked really…..different…… today at the ugly picture event.

      Liked by 7 people

    • JRD says:

      WAKE UP and be realistic. At best President Dumb-0’s reputation will be ruined.
      “You can’t always get what you want. But if you try sometime, you’ll find, you get what you NEED.”

      Liked by 1 person

      • David A says:

        Sometimes in history a great man comes by, and makes that which appears to be impossible, inevitable.

        It looked off the cuff when Trump told HRC he was going to “lock her up” She looked stunned.
        I think it was prophetic justice, an intuitive understanding that he would have to do exactly that.

        Liked by 4 people

    • Rick says:

      Fle, I’m going to be a little more blunt. I’ve become disgusted with this former Administration beyond words. It’s time to tell it the way it is. Those with sensitive ears, need not read any more, I do not mean to offend anyone here.

      The truth is that Obummer was walking around his plane with a boner for all to see because Susan Rice was doing her work for the pleasure of the President. This little email stunt of hers, on Inauguration Day was just another, in a long line of corrupt decisions that were always far from the truth. Part of her fiber. The email was a flip of the bird before her final computer shutdown on the way out. Don’t forget to turn out the lights, Susan. A show of elevating her brilliance, loyalty and a final fall on the sword for her douche bag President. The woman fantasized all-Obama! She was always there to do his clean-up and dirty bidding. Her actions were here way of seeking approval, power and she ended up being very wealthy for servicing all of Obummer’s needs. Powers and Rice were the Salt and Pepper that was added to the crappy dish served to America by the fraud, as they both served him.

      You don’t end up with a net worth beyond $50M in the limited government roles that Susan Rice enjoyed for a period of 8 years. You do end up with a net worth far beyond $50M if you give up your soul for the Devil.

      AMEN!

      Liked by 3 people

  8. joeknuckles says:

    My takeaway from Rice’s email is that it shows a consciousness of guilt.

    Liked by 17 people

  9. Fake Nametag says:

    Two thoughts from this:

    1. They must have really believed they would succeed in preventing President-elect Trump from being inaugurated. Otherwise they wouldn’t be doing butt-covering maneuvers on Inauguration Day.

    2. How do they do this entire interview without addressing the other (bombshell) part of Rice’s self-email which says “as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia” ? In other words, that statement says: We are going to cover up what we were doing with the Russia investigation.

    Liked by 22 people

    • luke says:

      Your first point is very astute. I remember after my brief celebration on Nov 9th I was paranoid until after the electoral college voted in December. With the Stein recounts and faithless electors not mention the behind the scenes sedition act being carried out.

      I wonder if they chickened out? Maybe a little scared of blood in the streets yada yada? And at the last minute decided ahhh WTH how much damage can Trump do to our precious little cabal, we’ll have him out in 6 months anyway…..just some things I’ve wondered.

      Liked by 12 people

      • Fake Nametag says:

        I was thinking more along the lines that they believed they’d get some dirt off the wiretaps that they could use against him, then it didn’t happen and they had to butt-cover at the last minute.

        Liked by 9 people

        • steph_gray says:

          ^^This!^^

          These people are so dirty they go around assuming everyone else is in the dirt too. They thought they’d find a gold mine on our Lion. It’s heart-warming to imagine their extreme consternation when…NOT.

          Liked by 1 person

    • Anonymous says:

      No. By the 5th, they knew he was going to come in for sure. For one thing Obama was the one who called Hillary to tell her to concede on election night.

      This was mostly about trying to cover tracks and make it look like they didn’t do anything wrong. Perhaps a little bit to set up ongoing activities after they left. But trying to stop the Inauguration is conspiracy thinking. They had no basis to believe that and in fact the Inauguration happened without event.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Fake Nametag says:

        I wasn’t thinking along the more conspiratorial lines. Just that they might have thought they could catch him in a crime on the wiretaps and then release it to the press before Inauguration Day, then they would expect him to step aside under pressure. I never thought they would subvert the inauguration process via the electors or any of those other unlikely scenarios.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Esperanza says:

          Except they knew there was nothing. We know there was nothing, they said so! Anti Trump patient zero said themselves there was no there there. Rather they realised their trap wasn’t working with the American public.

          Liked by 2 people

          • Fake Nametag says:

            It wouldn’t have had to be the manufactured Russia dirt, it could have been any serious crime or scandal picked up on the wiretap, then leaked to the press. What if he’d had a dirty phone call with a mistress? It would have been leaked, the woman found and outed, and the media would have revisited the pu$$ytape rage and demanded he step aside before the inauguration.

            Thankfully PDJT is squeaky clean and also wise enough to know he was being tapped. I hope he spent a lot of time on the phone talking about what a pansy and total dick Obama is.

            Liked by 1 person

    • AH_C says:

      1. Get her to defend her memorialization that it was by the book.
      2. Gotcha
      3. Now let her try to defend hiding info from incoming admin.

      No admin has the right to hide anything from their successor.

      Like

      • steph_gray says:

        Good point. Is this 5 years secret thing on the presidential library new with the Obammunist? I seem to remember it was… And I remember some complaints on our side at the time about the would-be Emperor of the Universe just deciding that unilaterally.

        Liked by 1 person

  10. Garavaglia says:

    “Dear me….I did everything right…Barry too. That is all.”

    Liked by 17 people

  11. Lumina says:

    Title of Obama’s autobiography, ” By The Book.”

    Liked by 8 people

  12. thomasdiner says:

    It seems like the ultimate “fall on the sword” kamakazi soldier of he Obama regime has taken one more bullet for the team. Watch her story will be: I wrote the letter/memo on January 5th and I thought that I had sent it in the matter of course. Then as I was clearing out my computer on the last day, I discovered it in my “Draft folder.” I thought OMG . .this was supposed to have gone out 3 weeks ago ..quick send it now!!!

    Liked by 6 people

  13. kenmar1965 says:

    If Susan Rice regularly memorialized conversations in this manner, this email might be plausible…. in this case, it is not.

    Liked by 9 people

  14. bullnuke says:

    (U-DC)…😂😂😂

    Liked by 6 people

  15. pmdea says:

    Wonder what was redacted (quite a few sentences by the look) from the Rice email – to herself!

    Liked by 2 people

    • wolfmoon1776 says:

      I’m thinking it was about “Muh Russia” surveillance, pretending it’s real. THAT is what they would be throwing Comey under the bus about. The whole point is that she’s saying COMEY was supposed to come to OBAMA and inform him of something unstated, that will be used to fill in the “update” blank. It’s a nice general dodge – “Comey should have said something, it’s HIS FAULT, and OBAMA didn’t know.”

      Liked by 1 person

  16. GB Bari says:

    The only good thing here is that Lindsey Grahamnesty is often a go-to Republican for the media because he’s been reliably anti Trump and quite often unsupportive of the Presidents agenda. He’s definitely not reading the Democrat narrative on this one. Wonder if he’ll be interviewed or even quoted on the commie news networks.

    Liked by 9 people

    • TDU_Weight says:

      Grassley, Goodlatte and Nunes get together every morning and rock/paper/scissors to see which committee gets to drop a MOAB that day. Once the winning committee is decided the Repub members do the same thing to decide who gets to be on point with the media.

      Liked by 1 person

  17. jahealy says:

    I’ve seen it mentioned. I’m guessing the investigating white hats know exactly what OFA paid the law firm for. Hopefully we’ll learn the details at some point.

    Liked by 5 people

  18. fleporeblog says:

    Liked by 27 people

  19. AngelOne says:

    I’ve never been a huge Graham fan but he’s seen the tea leaves, Trump is here to stay and put distance between himself and McCain as Lindsey wants to join Trump for the long haul.
    Graham’s little boy smirk with his Innocently posed gotcha questions are delightful and he’s proving himself to be quite the asset to the truth seeking deplorables.

    Liked by 6 people

    • rich says:

      Drip, drip, drip. Every day another jewel comes out. Tick tock tick tock….

      Liked by 4 people

    • calbear84 says:

      At some point even the most ardent Never Trumpers will surrender to the temptation of looking good while speaking the truth. Hence the midterm landslide.

      Liked by 1 person

    • ledygrey says:

      I wa under the impression Lindsay Graham & McCain were best buddies. What’s up?

      Like

      • brh82 says:

        ledygrey, my guess has been that McCain having one foot on a banana peel and the other in the cremation furnace forces Graham to look for a new fall-guy/cohort-in-crime. He’s just stupid enough to think casting out the net with the letter to Rice might catch him the right replacement for McCain. Personally, I think McCain will still be around for a long time.

        Like

  20. dizzymissl says:

    So clearly a CYA. I can’t stop laughing 😂😂😂

    Liked by 2 people

  21. Trey Dawg says:

    It reeks of desperation.In my mind I imagine her in her office dreading the fact that soon she will be out of power. Power that’s needed to keep the lid on everything, so what does she do? A lsat ditch effort at covering her a zz on the one thing that keeps her awake at night, Treasonous acts committed that she was a large part of.

    Liked by 6 people

    • Little Annie’s Fannie says:

      Maybe she was pondering the growth (or lack thereof) of her net worth. After all, losing this gig was going to seriously cramp her enrichment!

      Like

    • ledygrey says:

      I bet she was hoping until the last possible second that something would happen to prevent Trump from actually being inaugurated as President.

      Liked by 1 person

      • AH_C says:

        As mentioned by another commenter, it was designed to avoid the National Archives and Oboobie’s Library from “hoovering” it up. So it could be found in the white house servers.

        Since anything sent/received prior to 12:00:00 was removed from the email servers and archived. Also recall that he and Grassley had to request the NA to provide certain documents.

        Liked by 1 person

  22. Troublemaker10 says:

    I think it was an insurance policy in case it was discovered “how they knew what they knew” (Farkas statement) and corrupt actions … for the WH to cover their arse and throw Comey, DOJ, and FBI under the bus to take all the blame.

    Liked by 3 people

  23. Anonymous says:

    When was the check cut?

    Like

  24. Anonymous says:

    What’s funny about it is how ham handed it was. It just makes them look worse than if they did nothing. She really is not a smart one like Shumer or the like.

    Liked by 3 people

  25. Fe says:

    Oh you’re killing me SD with the (U) DC….second time I’ve seen you out that in your article. May have been other times, but it’s hilarious every.single.time. 😁😂😂

    Liked by 3 people

  26. Graham is asking the right question.
    Why would a person write an email 15 days later to point out the at the meeting people should do what is not just expected of them, but their job.
    Why would she emphasize doing things by the book as a driving focus of the meeting?

    Honest AND innocent people do not stress these points. They never think about them.
    She, Rice, is guilty of either knowing or being a part of something dishonest.
    People should view this not as a reminder for the record, but as an admission that at that meeting, those were the only words that were never said.

    Liked by 6 people

  27. Fake Nametag says:

    Did she send herself a similar email a couple weeks after Benghazi?

    Liked by 10 people

    • CommonSenseConservativeFL says:

      So if we take her email at face value (I don’t but bear with me) and they did actually do this one “by the book”…because it was explicitly stated…how many were not “by the book”…shouldn’t they all have been “by the book”, and not need a supposed explicit directive? Admits more guilt than she does exonerating anyone with this email. She’s amazingly stupid.

      Liked by 10 people

  28. DesertRain says:

    I’m wondering if Ms. Rice was in the habit of keeping notes on important meetings she attended. Was it dept policy (ie “by the book”) to keep notes like the one she wrote on Jan 20? And to do so using an email to self as a note storage system?

    And we know that about a month later, Mr Comey was also writing memos to himself……Was he doing so per policy, personal habit, or did his boss issue an order?

    If I were Graham or Grassley, I’d add an 11th question to dig into their note taking history.

    Liked by 4 people

  29. SR says:

    Obama has too much faith in Valerie Jarrett, Susan Rice and Power. But time has own speed and people change. How long these people and DNC lie and take bullet for Obama and Hillary?

    Liked by 4 people

    • EV22 says:

      Samantha Power has two children under the age of 10….

      Liked by 1 person

        • wolfmoon1776 says:

          The question is whether her hubs Cass Sunstein goes to prison for something too. He seems pretty innocent now, but TROLLGATE will eventually come out – where they used foreign and domestic resources to do a lot of nasty stuff online, per Sunstein’s theories of propaganda. If they crossed over into illegality (and they stopped doing a lot of things, so I suspect they did), then he may need to cut a deal, too. He kinda slid out the side door – something up with that.

          Liked by 2 people

          • EV22 says:

            Thanks for the info wolfie. Somehow II missed that. Trollgate, need to look that up.

            Liked by 1 person

            • wolfmoon1776 says:

              It has barely been discussed, and it may not make it to sunlight before all these people are hauled away for a lot more. But it was back during the 2013-2014 timeframe. There was a strong effort to suppress conservative thought on social media, and it clearly had a lot of people, a lot of money, and a lot of cooperation with people in the various tech companies affecting online speech.

              It MAY pop out of later DOJ scandals. We’ll have to see.

              Like

          • 🍺Gunny says:

            I think you are absolutely correct in that there are many smaller, but violations of the law that can be prosecuted. I believe there are more people sweating this out than we realize.

            Liked by 1 person

          • steph_gray says:

            Cass Sunstein! That’s a blast from the past, I’d all but forgotten him… Love duckduckgo – it surfaces articles Google would never… Cass was a longtime Obama crony – looks like he was involved in plans to use school curriculums to force-feed ideology to students, copying Chinese initiatives.

            Liked by 1 person

            • wolfmoon1776 says:

              Oh, yeah! Cass was DESPISED by the “troll-hunters” back when the Obama trolls were super-organized and attacking people in ways that would be highly illegal if connected to the government. In fact, one reason I jumped immediately on SD’s idea that DOJ was behind IRS, is that it explained why certain curious DOJ/FBI resources and government spending had been ABUSED for psy-op purposes online – a.k.a. TROLLGATE. Things could not be explained by groups like Brock and OFA alone – there HAD to be heavy ILLEGAL coordination with .gov resources.

              Cass Sunstein was suspected because he actually advocated stuff close to what we were seeing. He was tight in and high up in the Obama ranks back then. And these people CLEARLY had resources to make them seem much bigger than they were in real life – PURE ALINSKY. So it all added up, and got stuck to his name, even though we never had a smoking gun.

              The bottom line is that we figured they were ABUSING government resources to “re-educate” us out on the boards, and were FURTHER using government resources to harass and intimidate as needed. They were also doing very strange psy-op stuff that made me certain they actually HAD government files on people (and were reading them IMPROPERLY, thus making HUGE mistakes!)

              I am SURE that the people overseeing the stuff that OK’ed Trollgate will FLEE DOJ. But the records will be there. Very likely that money and intel leaked out to stealthy progressive orgs. Where they justified the money to financially leave .gov could be anywhere, but the PLANNING and justification will be in DOJ, in my opinion, as well as access to anti-True-the-Vote-type resources. I think there will be SIMILARITY to IRS. I don’t know if they will find Sunstein’s fingerprints – more likely Eric Holder’s AFTER getting some push or suggestion from Sunstein.

              It is very interesting that they BACKED OFF around the same time that Cass Sunstein became invisible, too.

              Like

    • billrla says:

      SR: I have thought the same thing: There is no more reason for any one conspirator to keep up the charade. Now, it’s everyone for himself or herself. They are all going down. There’s no place to hide.

      Liked by 1 person

    • scott467 says:

      “How long these people and DNC lie and take bullet for Obama and Hillary?”

      _________________

      Why would anyone take the fall for Hussein or Hill-rat?

      There is no honor among thieves, and even less among traitors.

      Wickedness knows no loyalty, only self-interest.

      In whose interest is it, to spend the rest of their life in prison or go to the gas chamber, on behalf of the Hussein or the Hildebeast?

      They’re already on their own, whether they know it or not.

      …………………………..
      Q: “Hussein is evil and a real loser. No special treatment. Shopping around for a (new) handler/protection is fun to watch on the SATs / spy comms. Morons, all of them.”
      …………………………..

      Liked by 3 people

  30. Cat Lady says:

    Most people seem to be assuming that the email was actually sent on Inauguration Day 2017. How do we know she didn’t send it MUCH MORE RECENTLY with a faked time stamp to make it LOOK LIKE it was sent on Inauguration Day? Reread Grassley’s lette!! He’s not sure either!!

    Liked by 3 people

    • Anonymous says:

      I’m unclear on the timestamp clue. Not sure how she could get it into the archival records much after she left office. It might be off a minor amount (like during turnover), but I don’t see how it would be very recent. I could be wrong, but that is initial thinking.

      Maybe it is just them wanting to get confirmation of the time on record, not some big deception. IOW, have her agree to the timing.

      Like

    • ledygrey says:

      How is it possible to send an email with faked time stamp to yourself?

      Like

    • AH_C says:

      Unless she’s a hacker, she can’t fake the timestamp. Not on a enterprise network where you can’t change your own computer’s clock (or shouldn’t be able to).

      Plus another way to cross check is to look at each timestamp between “sent” and “received”.

      Liked by 1 person

      • scott467 says:

        “Unless she’s a hacker, she can’t fake the timestamp. Not on a enterprise network where you can’t change your own computer’s clock (or shouldn’t be able to).”

        __________________

        NSA has it all. 🙂

        Q: “You didn’t think this was simply about words did you? We have it all.”

        .

        Q: “Will the FBI recover those missing texts? [Nothing is ever truly deleted]. Your move.”

        .

        Q: “The flood is coming. Emails, videos, audio, pics, etc. FBI accidentally deletes texts? No Such Agency accidentally releases IT ALL > Shall we play a game?”

        Liked by 4 people

    • scott467 says:

      “Most people seem to be assuming that the email was actually sent on Inauguration Day 2017. How do we know she didn’t send it MUCH MORE RECENTLY with a faked time stamp to make it LOOK LIKE it was sent on Inauguration Day?”

      _________________

      Ohhhhhh…… oh, I hope she did… please let it be so.

      And if she did, it’s already known, for sure, lol!

      It would be such fun to catch and expose her, dead to rights, for altering government records in the furtherance of a conspiracy to commit Treason with Traitor 44 🙂

      Come on, Suzie.

      Make my day.

      Liked by 3 people

    • 🍺Gunny says:

      If what your saying is true, then I would expect many more, just to deflect from him.

      Like

  31. Without the umbilical cord connected to John McCain, Linds ventures out on his own.

    Liked by 4 people

  32. positron1352 says:

    Susan Rice thinking: “Gotta remember verbatim what we agreed the story was.”

    Liked by 1 person

  33. Le Borgne says:

    I’m neither Graham watcher, nor a body language expert, but the very subtle facial muscle movements were telling. Watch the clip 4, 5, 6 times, paying close attention to the eyes and the mouth. Maybe he’s always like this, but I read a knowing bemusement. He knows exactly what she was up to.

    Liked by 3 people

  34. Harry Lime says:

    Sticky Rice full of beans!

    Like

  35. Blasater says:

    Oh Lindsay!! You forgot that your soul mate John McCain, hand delivered the “Democrat-Fusion-Russian” dossier to the FBI…did you forget? YOu know….by the book!

    Either Lindsay knows this is all imploding or this is all some orchestrated theater for some nefarious purpose..

    Liked by 2 people

    • MaineCoon says:

      It will be his lucky day if his BFF McTraitor dies before all is exposed, then U-DC Lindy can lie and say McTraitor never said a word to him…There’s a plan. Oh, yah. McTraitor passing on is part of it. Hope he wasn’t lying about that….

      Like

  36. starfcker says:

    And who were the lawyers at Perkins voice that worked on this case? It’s a big firm. But they do have names and photographs

    Liked by 1 person

  37. scott467 says:

    “Senator Lindsey Graham (U-DC)”

    ________________

    U-DC.

    Uni-Party, Washington D.C.

    I love it.

    Liked by 1 person

  38. starfcker says:

    The best part is, everyday now, a different conspirator gets slapped around. Great stuff, if you want to create a panic. What do they know? Am I next? How can I talk to so and so to warn them? Why can’t Evelyn Farkus tell me what’s going on? Can we meet on the airplanes in Phoenix? What the hell is taking Mueller so long? They told me she would win!! Is it cold in AdMax?

    Liked by 4 people

  39. scott467 says:

    Graham (laughing under his breath): “So she’s sending herself an email, talking about a conversation on January the 5th with the president, reassuring herself, and I guess the president, that ‘this’ would be done ‘by the book’. I think that’s odd and disturbing because we know that the investigation regarding the Trump campaign was anything but ‘by the book’.

    _________________

    Not reassuring herself OR the president.

    Clearly, this is intentionally ‘planted’ evidence to ‘reassure’ anyone who might investigate their treasonous activity.

    The purpose was to mislead any future investigation.

    The effect will only be to provide a set of ‘talking points’ for a single news cycle, before it is exposed as just another obstruction of justice.

    Q: “These people are sick.”

    Q: “These people are EVIL.”

    Liked by 3 people

  40. Oddly enough, Graham is not a latecomer on this. He was aligned with Grassley fairly early on, when it was sort of a lonely position to be. It’s one of the biggest headscratchers, as far as I am concerned.

    Liked by 1 person

    • H.R. says:

      Taking out the competition for the Uniparty dollars?
      Besides, if you’re a little unpredictable, you get more money to make sure you stay bought.

      Like

  41. scott467 says:

    “11. You wrote that President Obama stressed that he was not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. Did President Obama ask about, initiate, or instruct anything from any other perspective relating to the FBI’ s investigation?”

    ______________________

    As Sundance stated in the other article on this letter to Susan Rice from Grassley and Graham, “Senator Grassley is not asking questions he doesn’t already know the answers to.”

    So there is no way Rice can answer ANY of these questions without further jeopardizing herself and Hussein.

    That means the discussion going on right now within the coven is whether to plead the 5th or have Hussein assert Executive Privilege.

    Either one is going to be a fun ride.

    These kinds of decisions among the traitors require intense discussion. How are they going to do that, when the military and the NSA (and who knows what else) are carrying out lawful surveillance on the conspirators who are engaged in an ongoing attempt to overthrow the duly elected government?

    They could be using underwater smoke signals in a sensory deprivation chamber, and Big Brother would still be recording and transcribing every last word in real time.

    Welcome to it, Hussein.

    Sleep well.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Anonymous says:

      Graham probably knows the answers to some, suspects the answers to others, and doesn’t know others. He’s not omniscient. Neither side is. This is like a submarine battle. Got sonar, bearing, bearing rate, history, and some general ideas on tactics. But you are still dealing with an enemy you can’t see. Have to connect the dots and develop hypotheses and test them.

      Like

    • steph_gray says:

      I can imagine this discovered on the list of Amazon deliveries to those new digs they share with the Val-Gal: “Teach Yourself How To Use Ham Radio!”

      Like

    • tampa2 says:

      Can Executive Privilege be invoked post-presidency? I think not, unless, maybe, a matter of national security. I don’t know, Scott.

      Like

  42. yakmaster2 says:

    I think Rice included the fake portion of this meeting where Obama wants to “ascertain” from a “national security perspective” whether there is anything that might prevent them (outgoing Adminatration) from disclosing “fully” information on Russia to the incoming Adminstration as a way of giving CREDENCE to spying on the Trump team. It’s her snarky sneaky way of saying the whole conspiracy was LEGITIMATE National Security counterintelligence inquiry. (snort!)

    Oh, how high-minded and noble of them to try and save the country from the incoming Russian puppet President! And Comey, supposedly telling Obama that he’d let him know “if anything changed” in the next couple of weeks. WTH??

    Yep, this is both CYA and “justification” for Comey and the DOJ and State Dept to keep up their Russian Collusion Conspiracy. And it’s all neatly wrapped up in one little memo from Susan to Susan— Just in case it’s needed later. Ha!

    Liked by 1 person

  43. Andy says:

    The Obama-Comey meeting took place on January 5, 2017. And yet Comey testified under oath to the Senate Intelligence Committee in June 2017 that he had met Obama in person only twice: “Once in 2015 to discuss law enforcement policy issues and a second time, briefly, for him to say goodbye in late 2016.” Doesn’t sound like he remembers the Jan. 5, 2017 meeting where it was agreed things would be done “by the book.” Or was that in fact the “brief goodbye” meeting and Comey is off on the date? Anyway, his testimony didn’t mention any in-person meeting where there was a discussion of doing things “by the book.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2017/live-updates/trump-white-house/james-comey-testimony-what-we-learn/why-comey-documented-his-talks-with-trump-not-obama/?utm_term=.6736d3e2668c

    Liked by 5 people

  44. KBR says:

    Will perkins coie get taken down in the end?

    Like

    • starfcker says:

      KBR, my point is, what is Perkins Coie? Looks like it is a law firm, that might have some dirty lawyers. Which ones? Wouldn’t you like to know who they are? Wouldn’t you like to read articles that connected the dots as to who the dirty lawyers are, instead of just saying Perkins Coie? I would. And I would bet it’s coming next. Hi there, filthy little Perkins Coie lawyer. I know you are reading this. Save yourself. Call Jeff Sessions. Do it today. Otherwise, we’re going to get you, too.

      Like

  45. Ree Fungorio says:

    How is it that Ambassadors got to the point of such influence? I don’t really remember past Ambassadors being so involved with anything let alone being involved with intelligence and espionage. Why is it that Rice or Samantha Power as UN Ambassadors were involved with unmasking and FISA crap? So much corruption. Pretty much how I would imagine the UN is.

    Like

    • OpenMind says:

      She was promoted to National Security Advisor at the White House after going through the gauntlet for the team re Behghazi. She proved herself in 2012 and got the promotion in 2013.

      Like

  46. A2 says:

    Ok a penultimate post on this conundrum. Let’s reverse a bit here. If Flynn had pleaded not guilty to lying to the FBI (a process crime) one fact is certain; he would have had his day in court via discovery. That means that the entire ‘muh Russian’ witch hunt would have been exposed.

    By extension, the President would have been vindicated, no collusion in the Trump team.

    By pleading guilty, Flynn whether willfully or otherwise gave the narrative legs, led to the appointment of a special counsel and here we are today.

    Like

  47. Richard Bilyew says:

    Didn’t she email it from here govt email to her civilian email account? That is the reason. So after transitioning she would still have the email and attachments, and could keep the conversation going or have for use. They probably also did this with a lot of the illegal intel they got thanks to the rat Brennan.

    Like

  48. John says:

    They planned to take down Flynn. Do it by the book.

    Like

  49. Donna in Oregon says:

    Once Adm Rogers realized what was going on the NSA captured the specifics. Obama may think he got rid of everything.

    Every criminal makes mistakes. Obama and Clinton loaded the bureaucracy full of supporters and it became too big to manage.

    That is why the Farkus ran around loose. Why Susan Rice emails herself. Why the MSM thinks silence will stop the truth.

    Sundance calls it The Big Ugly.

    Liked by 1 person

  50. Aleks says:

    Pretty common email practice to send to yourself to hide other addresses sent by blind copy. Could be a reminder to all “that’s our story and we’re sticking to it!”

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s