Chairman Nunes Asks FISA Court For Transcripts…

Mid-January House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte sent a letter to FISA Court presiding judge Rosemary Collyer requesting all the documents presented by the DOJ in their application for a “Title-1” FISA surveillance warrant over Carter Page.  The House Judiciary Committee holds primary statutory oversight over the Justice Department and the FISA Court.

The DOJ has the Carter Page surveillance application (the DOJ also has the authority to declassify the FISA appliction).  However, other than Chairman Goodlatte, the DOJ would only permit one person from each side of the House Intel Committee (HPSCI)  to review the application. Trey Gowdy and Adam Schiff were those two reviewers.

[*NOTE: We cannot confirm but strongly suspect – due to DOJ conduct and ongoing DOJ motives, Goodlatte wants to rule-out the possibility of two versions: an original application to the FISC, and an application the DOJ may have modified for congressional review. Hence, Goodlatte wants to see the application in the hands of the court.]

While Chairman Goodlatte is focused on the application, HPSCI Chairman Nunes is requesting the FISA Court transcript from the DOJ/FBI application hearing.  Nunes is seeking to understand how the “Title-1” application was presented to the court.

WASHINGTON – House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., is seeking transcripts from a top secret national security court regarding the FBI and Justice Department’s application for a surveillance warrant for a Trump campaign aide, according to a congressional letter obtained by Fox News.

Writing to Rosemary M. Collyer, the presiding judge at the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Nunes asked for transcripts of “any relevant FISC hearings associated with the initial FISA application or subsequent renewals related to electronic surveillance of Carter Page.”

[…] Transcripts from the application hearings could speak to a central issue in the debate: to what extent the FBI and DOJ relied on the dossier.  (read more)


This entry was posted in Big Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, FBI, media bias, President Trump, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

307 Responses to Chairman Nunes Asks FISA Court For Transcripts…

  1. Mark T says:

    Are they obligated, legally, to respond with the requested documents?

    Liked by 4 people

    • Publius2016 says:

      One hundred percent!

      Liked by 12 people

    • lieutenantm says:

      maybe Not to Nunes…but arguably to Goodlatte, they are.

      If the supervising Judge is not dirty…we may score!

      Liked by 2 people

    • MikeN says:

      No, I don’t think they are.


    • PS says:

      You’ll be happy to know that the Patriot Act Section 215 gives the Department of Justice the responsibility of oversight over the FISA court.

      Interestingly, Section 215 requires the Attorney General to produce an annual report to congress on the number of searches and FISA cases. That number was redacted in 2017 reporting on 2016. Reading through a summary, it is interesting that the report could not give a “good faith estimate” of number of “queries” because some agencies did not retain the number of searches that they performed. A full report is required by the end of 2018. I’m holding my breath.

      The number of searches on call records of American citizens are horrifying huge.

      Liked by 7 people

      • Don'tMessWithTexas says:

        “DOJ may have modified for congressional review”
        Versions to a court. That is rich.
        Keep digging, Sundance. We appreciate the work that you are doing. Hold their feet to the fire.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Suzanne says:

        If that number is required under section 251 why was it redacted and, more to the point, WHO authorized the redaction and thus could either be charged with violating a law or held in contempt of Congress and even more to the point where in he!! is Jeff Sessions and why didn’t he fire every single jugears appointee on 1/21/17

        Liked by 3 people

      • Suzanne says:

        furthermore, if Nunes really is a White Hat why, pray tell, did he sit on the Summary for a week thus allowing congress to vastly expand the government’s ability to spy on Americans

        Liked by 2 people

        • CustomsBrokerNAFTA_SME says:

          That is an extremely good – and simple – question.

          I understand the game plan is to continue to slow walk all this, why wouldn’t they? The amount of pressure on the coup plotters continues growing each and every day! Another DOJ “resignation” today, how many are we up to now?

          Exactly what were the language changes to the FISA that POTUS just signed into law? At some point near future i will have to read the damnable amendment bill and find out.

          It smells; yet our Lion signed it. Why?


        • Good Questions Deserve Honest Answers says:

          Because a FISA warrant is just like a gun. It can be used by the white hats to defend the nation or the black hats to kill the nation. We must have something FISA like that allows going after crooks while protecting citizens…while making sure it is not abused (again). Just getting rid of FISA sounds nice….but then getting rid of the second amendment sounds nice to those who think gun control is the solution to whatever.

          Liked by 1 person

      • MaineCoon says:

        Isn’t the site you cite the one that Comey’s BFF Witts writes for? It’s data doesn’t jive with the DoJ 2016 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress.

        On p. 28 it states that “During the calendar year 2016, The Government filed 1,477 final applications to FISC…Of these, 1,446 final filed applications included requests for authority to conduct electronic surveillance….The FISC did not deny any final filed applications in whole, or in part”

        This Report was submitted to Grassley, Goodlatte, Nunes and Burr.

        The below link is a chart with links to all similar Reports from 1996-2016.

        The 2018 Report (for year 2017) has not been posted yet.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Bill says:

      No, separation of powers

      Liked by 1 person

    • kriseton says:

      Nunes is part of the Gang of 8 in intel. I would assume for precisely this reason. He has the clearance and access to such documents in order to do his job of oversight. They shouldn’t be able to block him from getting what he requests.

      Liked by 3 people

      • kst2074 says:

        Unfortunately they blocked him for almost a year until they threatened the FBI and DOJ with contempt. The deep state is real and they are not playing by the rules. Nunes better get a lot tougher


    • Mark T. says:

      Nice name you got there fellow Treeper 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

    • fleporeblog says:

      I absolutely enjoyed the article I read the other day with Hugh Hewitt and Devin Nunes. He interviewed Rep. Devin Nunes and wrote a transcript of their interview. Nunes spoke about the possibility of asking Supreme Court Justice, John Roberts (Chief Justice of the FISA Court), to come & speak to the committee about the FISA process and what occurred in this case. Sundance pointed out that Hugh was wrong. Justice Roberts CAN be compelled to do so. Hugh said he couldn’t.

      I actually think what Nunes did was a smokescreen to put fear into the FISA
      Judge to comply fully with the request from February 7th. The last thing in the world you want is the Chief Justice of the FISA Court be get involved.

      From the article linked above:

      HH: Now the Chief Justice appoints the FISA judges. Have you had a chance to chat with him or any of the FISA judges about what went on at the FISA Court with regard to the Page application?

      DN: This is something that we grappled with, that we’ve been grappling with all through this investigation. We decided that we wanted to complete the FISA abuse portion before we approached the courts. Our next step with the courts is to make them aware, if they’re not aware already, that this happened by watching the news, so we will be sending a letter to the court. There is a, there’s a debate now into whether just send it to the Supreme Court or to send it to the FISA Court, and here’s why. And Hugh, you’d be a good guy to actually get your opinion on this. If, somehow, this case ends up at the Supreme Court, somehow, some way, by sending a letter to Roberts, do you conflict the Court?

      HH: They will not issue an advisory opinion. And since he appoints the judges and is the leader of Article III, I would think you would invite him to come and talk with the committee. You can’t compel him to come, obviously, but since he appoints the FISA judges, perhaps he would accept your invitation to a closed session. Would you welcome such an appearance by the Chief Justice before a closed session to discuss the FISA process?

      DN: So this is something that we have, like I said, we have thought a lot about this. And the answer is we don’t know the correct way to proceed because of the separation of powers issue. So as you know, you know, we have, I’m not aware of, I’m aware of members of Congress going to the Supreme Court and having coffee with the judges, just to shoot the bull. I’m aware of, you know, dinners where congressmen have been with Supreme Court justices. But I’m not aware of any time where a judge has, for lack of a better term, testified before the Congress.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Iamcat says:

      I’m thinking they can, but do not have to. I hope I’m wrong.


    • platypus says:

      Sorry but that’s not right. All federal courts except the Supreme Court are statutory courts which exist due to acts of Congress. Thus, all except the Supreme Court are under the authority of Congress. Don’t feel bad – lots of people are unaware of this truth.


  2. The Boss says:

    Just in time for the weekend. Have a nice one dems! NOT!

    Liked by 9 people

  3. oldsarg says:

    I bet you’re right. FBI gave one version to Congress and another to the FISA court! Damn!!!

    Liked by 24 people

  4. starfcker says:

    I love this stuff. The cover up is always worse than the crime. And the crime’s pretty bad. But these are sloppy people. I get the feeling that they all left paper trails in miles long. And one by one, their protectors keep getting shuffled out of the way.

    Liked by 10 people

  5. magatrump says:

    Keep up the pressure. Pray for justice. The truth will win out. MAGA

    Liked by 9 people

  6. DanO64 says:

    Start arresting people. Better yet, go ahead Ben, turn yourself in and start talking. Do it Ben.

    Liked by 3 people

  7. FL_GUY says:

    It’s a good thing that the D-Rats believed their own propaganda and that the conspirators believed the massive fraud they orchestrated would win for HilLIARy. They were sloppy after getting away with multiple crimes under the Criminal in Chief’s reign. I believe they left a criminal trail so large it can be seen from space without a telescope; so large they couldn’t sanitize it all.

    I see an airtight case being built against the conspirators; so many that Sundance has to put up org flow charts to keep track of the criminals. Slow is good when dealing with such an explosive situation. In the end, they are going down!

    Liked by 13 people

    • Publius2016 says:

      It’s not sloppiness…it’s the technology…we can capture anything digital once identified…it’s all there at NSA

      Liked by 3 people

    • Sugarhillhardrock says:

      I think the process devised by the committees and the OIG is akin to the anaconda or python coiling and squeezing, coiling and squeezing, coiling and squeezing….
      There is no escape for the prey, they are caught…..

      Liked by 4 people

  8. It’s getting difficult having patience waiting for the indictments. Tired of the libs thinking Mueller is going to get President Trump.

    I’d almost like to hibernate for a year, wake up, and see what happened.

    Liked by 8 people

    • Chuck says:

      Government moves at the speed of government…..

      Liked by 7 people

    • Not me, I can’t put this novel down.

      Liked by 13 people

    • Dats Right says:

      It was all cool. She’s gonna win. Know oen will be the wiser. She’ll love us for what we’ve done.

      Then came the MAGA MOAB!

      Liked by 8 people

    • Publius2016 says:

      He’s taking out the support personnel like Steve Wynn…

      Liked by 2 people

    • Dennis says:

      Very soon (within 90 days) the Mike Flynn charges will be dropped, likely with prejudice from the Judge. Add to that the real indictments and charges will be starting. It’s all crumbling around them. Our patience will be rewarded.

      Liked by 9 people

      • CaptainNonno says:

        My sense is that no charges till after OIG report. Maybe 30-60 days to digest and leak enough to prepare (soften) the citizenry then rollin downhill.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Joe says:

          OIG, SC, Grand Jury, Indictments


        • H.R. says:

          CaptainNonno: “My sense is that no charges till after OIG report.”

          That’s what I’m thinking, too. However, I’m prepared to wait longer if need be.

          The Sekrut Sosce-eye-itty are just puppets, up to and including Hillary and HWSRN. President Trump may be going after the puppet masters. The Saudis might have a role to play in that and it could take a while.

          Liked by 1 person

    • Shanna Gruen says:

      Even a year may be a short time. This wheels of justice move slowly. And often, even when you think you have it all sealed up, it doesn’t go the way you hope. I wouldn’t hope for much in the way of indictments, let alone prison time. If anyone does go to prison, it won’t be at the top level. Someone will fall on their sword. It’s always the flunkies who are punished. People like the Clintons and Obamas never pay a price and don’t think for a minute that that has changed. What we can hope for is not so much that people will be held accountable and punished, but that it will change things for the future. Never forget that there really is no justice in this life. It only comes when people have to face God. Here on earth, even in America, the system is so corrupt and dysfunctional that often the right things don’t happen.

      Liked by 4 people

      • You are displaying some strong negativity. Many of the rest of us will continue to focus on what we want, not what we fear. Trump knows these criminals have to be punished HARD, so no one will ever try this crap again. This situation is very likely to be an exception to your rule.

        Liked by 3 people

      • neal s says:

        You say folks like those at the top never are prosecuted. Lots of things that had never happened before have happened with PDJT being elected. Keep praying for him, all those who wish to help MAGA and the safety of them all and their families.

        I do believe that many have humbled themselves and prayed and that God is answering big time. Keep praying and be patient.

        Liked by 12 people

        • thluckyone says:

          GBY, neal s! Wuz’ just gonna lurk but I happened to see your testimony that “many have humbled themselves and prayed and that God is answering big time“. AMEN! THANK YOU! And so the meek shall inherit! BLESS YOU, neal s!

          Liked by 2 people

      • RSExteriors says:

        Having worked in Corrections for many years and having worked in a Witness Protection Unit for many years unfortunately it is usually the “big guys” that get the easy deal and easy time and they rat out everyone under them. Then those guys do the hard time. No always but way to much of the time. Prosecutors like lots of notches on their belts so they turn a big guy and he does a little easy time in a witness unit and testifies against everyone below them

        Liked by 2 people

      • Uncle Al says:

        When anyone criticizes your negativity, remind them that
        when a pessimist is surprised it is always a happy surprise.

        When I’m wearing my CYNICAL CURMUDGEON hat, I agree with you.
        But when I’m wearing my MAGA hat, it makes me hope for the best.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Sherbear says:

        I agree, the corruption is worldwide, so impossible to extinguish, Mt T would have to go after serco, and the ses for true change.


    • cozette says:

      If Republicqns don’t win in November President Trump will be impeached and MAGA will be blocked. I invite EVERYONE to focus on what they can control; the elections rather than passively consuming the “soap opera” or hibernating as if they have ZERO to do with how things turn out. Each of us will be judged based on our ACTIONS.


      • Well, Republicans WILL win in November. But for the sake of argument let’s suppose that they lose the House and POTUS is impeached.

        That still does not mean anything. An impeachment is just the indictment of an elected official. It still has to go to the Senate for trial, and that takes a vote of 2/3 of the Senate to convict a President who has been impeached.

        Remember that Bill Clinton was impeached and did not miss a beat in his Presidential duties. In fact, there is no President in the history of our country that has ever left office over an impeachment.

        This is Trump’s party now–He has no fears and he understands this.

        There will be 7 more years of MAGA!

        Liked by 3 people

    • modsquad says:

      What? And miss the playoffs?


  9. Publius2016 says:

    These fools know they have Congress at their beck and call! Wake up! They just took down Steve Wynn Best RNC Finance Chair ever on bogus charges from “sealed” settlements…Special Counsel is going through everyone with fine tooth comb…who can withstand “allegations” from their entire life???

    Liked by 2 people

  10. RM says:

    “Goodlatte wants to rule-out the possibility of two versions: an original application to the FISC, and an application the DOJ may have modified for congressional review.”
    Treachery and Treason always travel hand in hand. The FBI (including Director Wray) cannot be trusted. Thank God for Goodlatte and the other patriots standing tall.

    Liked by 8 people

  11. President Trump is teaching many of the Republicans how to fight and win for the American people.

    Liked by 9 people

  12. NOTevenAtadPC4U says:

    Hillary Clinton: ‘If that f-ing bastard Trump wins, we all hang from nooses’

    Hmmm I guess she got that one right.

    Liked by 10 people

  13. missilemom says:

    What if the FISA judge was in on this deception? Nothing shocks me anymore.

    Liked by 6 people

  14. Pinkybigtoe says:

    I hope Americans wake up to all this corruption and sedition and demand justice. I will be shocked if the “major” players are locked up. I have personally lost faith in our justice system. Lawlessness.

    Liked by 2 people

  15. wheatietoo says:

    If the FISA Court does not comply…then this give Nunes the perfect ‘reason’ to seek a discussion with Chief Justice Roberts.

    Brilliant. On two levels.

    Liked by 15 people

  16. Le Borgne says:

    Just like the Grassley/Graham criminal referral letter. Goodlatte and Nunes are asking for this info because they already know what they’ll find. Good trial attorneys never ask questions of a witness – friendly or hostile – unless they already know the answer.

    Liked by 14 people

  17. I’m glad you’re having a good laugh, but providing an intelligent argument to go along with it would sound much less troll-like.

    Liked by 6 people

    • RAC says:

      I think Wray will turn out to be an OK guy. Remember the ” please don’t ever text me again ” text. That was such an abrupt end to their chatty behavior something immediate must have come up. Looking back over the CTH articles of that day and those immediately preceding the only thing of note was five days before that when the Wray nomination was approved on the 20th June. So I’m thinking that they knew Wray was not in their circle of deceit or at the very least he was an unknown quantity to them.

      Liked by 2 people

      • bkrg2 says:

        i like your theory. it’s the best explaination for “dont text me”
        i’m certain Wray is a good guy too – otherwise Trump would not have picked him.


  18. Sylvia Avery says:

    Sundance sez: “The House Judiciary Committee holds primary statutory oversight over …the FISA Court.”

    I did NOT know that, and my heart leapt with joy when I saw that. Oh, boy! FISA is going to have to comply whether they like it or not.

    Liked by 16 people

    • One of the best moments of Rosenstein’s last appearance before that committee was when he was stonewalling — followed by Goodlatte’s reminder that his team had prime oversight. Rosenstein just conceded the point with beta body language.

      Liked by 3 people

  19. FL_GUY says:

    This is interesting reported just now on Gateway Pundit:
    Rachel Brand is leaving DOJ:

    …..Brand holds an extensive portfolio overseeing the Department’s antitrust and civil rights divisions. The outgoing official was instrumental in extending the National Security Agency’s “warrantless surveillance program.”

    Brand joins a growing list of key officials leaving the FBI/DOJ cabal amid Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s probe into the bureau’s Clinton email investigation.

    IG Horowitz’s report must be a doozy!

    Liked by 20 people

  20. Lurker2 says:

    This is good. Let’s find out how the FBI presented their case for a warrant to the court. The application just has the raw info, the arguments to the court will reveal just how much the FBI relied on the dossier.

    Liked by 4 people

  21. WFO says:

    The cocky will morph into dread as soon as the second Special Counsel is appointed and a Grand Jury is empaneled. It needs to happen sooner than later. Get this party started!

    Liked by 4 people

  22. jmclever says:

    Can Strzok and Page be held in Contempt of Congress for withholding some of those 302s?

    Liked by 4 people

  23. Pyrran says:

    When we get the national security letters that have been generated by the FISA request, we’ll have a road map of everything they’ve done.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Bert Darrell says:

    It’s treason if Obama broke the law and mutilated the US Constitution to destroy the presidential candidate of the opposing party.

    Liked by 6 people

    • kroesus says:

      duuuuh….Bammy USURPED the office of POTUS as an ineligible person as per the US Constitution…..then he got down to some real law breaking with his partners in crime including all sitting members of Congress and SCOTUS who acquiesced to a KNOWN fraud taking the seat

      Liked by 1 person

  25. litlbit2 says:

    I sorry be this crappy system of obtaining any information about corruption is beyond any common thought process! You want to talk sh…hole. For years there have been so many dishonest folks covering up the hole, who would think they could be working!

    This has got to change Clinton, Bush, Obama, House Speakers, Majority Leaders, government employees all with benefits plus retirement God have mercy on this scum.

    Must be a simpler way, ask for the information-3days, if stonewalled, you are fired, you lie you are fired, losing all benefits plus retirement being also responsible for all charges personally.

    Liked by 3 people

  26. BobInFL says:

    HMMMMM…..Rachael Brand now leaving her post as number 3 at Justice? Job market must really be picking up! Gateway Pundit reporting……

    Liked by 2 people

  27. mazziflol says:

    Oh good… Let Gowdy see what’s in it so he can run defense. Good plan.


  28. scott467 says:

    “However, other than Chairman Goodlatte, the DOJ would only permit one person from each side of the House Intel Committee (HPSCI) to review the application. Trey Gowdy and Adam Schiff were those two reviewers.”


    So two BLACK HATS, two Uni-Party Deep State activists, one a complete criminal and the other a likely criminal, reviewed the documents.

    That’s great.

    And once again, the AUTHORITY is all ASS-BACKWARDS.

    The HOUSE has AUTHORITY over the DOJ. The DOJ doesn’t get to “permit” anything.

    The HOUSE makes DEMANDS, and the DOJ either COMPLIES or whoever in the DOJ is obstructing the HOUSE gets FROG-MARCHED to PRISON.

    We’re being played again.

    As if the Congress — which created the DOJ and the FIB and all these other corrupt treasonous alphabet agencies is subordinate to these agencies.

    The created is NOT greater than the Creator.

    Never has been, never will be.

    STOP IT.

    Liked by 6 people

  29. L. E. Joiner says:

    Too many damned committees! Are they working together, or at cross-purposes? Who knows?

    I think we need a Select Committee of the Congress, a la Army-McCarthy, Watergate, Iran-Contra, etc., with professional counsel and staff, able to subpoena and interrogate at any length, on nationwide gavel-to-gavel TV. See more here:

    /Mr Lynn

    Liked by 1 person

  30. MIKE says:

    Trey Gowdy and Atom Schiff as the reviewers?

    Liked by 2 people

  31. cheryl says:

    So Nunes suspects the documents were altered before they got to his hands. Whoa.

    Liked by 2 people

  32. Ziiggii says:

    the #3 at DOJ
    “A friend of Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand told The Associated Press she is stepping down for a private sector job. “

    Liked by 1 person

  33. Ziiggii says:

    Liked by 1 person

  34. 4harrisonblog says:

    Congress can impeach and convict judges even SCOTUS judges.

    Liked by 2 people

  35. tav144 says:

    _[*NOTE: We cannot confirm but strongly suspect – due to DOJ conduct and ongoing DOJ motives, Goodlatte wants to rule-out the possibility of two versions: an original application to the FISC, and an application the DOJ may have modified for congressional review. Hence, Goodlatte wants to see the application in the hands of the court.]_

    I believe that what DOJ may have modified for congressional review (if this speculation is true) is a removal of Michael Cohen’s alleged visit to Prague that has been proven wrong. In the transcript prior to voting on the Minority’s memo, there’s commentary stating that the Cohen allegation was not in the FISA application/affidavit (see pg 20):

    The Cohen /Prague allegation imo proves they were using signal intelligence database search illegally, by searching for Michael Cohen with his DOB. They didn’t count on the fact that there were two Michael Cohen’s with the same DOB.

    Liked by 8 people

  36. thedoc00 says:

    I hope there is change log for every bit of paper work and form associated with Operation Trump at DoJ, FBI etc.. The back dating and updating has been occurring since 20 January 2017.

    Liked by 4 people

  37. alliwantissometruth says:

    Dear Chairman Nunes,

    Judge Collyer would love to honor your request for the transcripts as she believes in transparency & open, honest government

    Unfortunately, she took the transcripts, along with all copies ever made, home with her & her dog “Benedict Arnold” ate them all. He was very hungry that day

    She’s very sorry & has scolded the dog

    Best of luck,
    Judge Collyers mom

    Liked by 5 people

  38. Who are the people that are in-line to fill the deleted ranks of the FBI hierarchy? And the President pick them without congressional approval?

    Liked by 1 person

  39. and can the President pick them!


    • Sylvia Avery says:

      Rachel Brand and Rod Rosenstein were Trump appointees. Let’s just hope that by now he has better advisors. I’m sure it was the transition team who made those recommendations to him. And Rachel Brand looked good on paper. Federalist Society, I think. SMH.


      • WSB says:

        Until you hit the work she did for the COC and Ben Wittes/WaPo/Brookings loves her, so there’s that.

        Liked by 3 people

        • Sylvia Avery says:

          Yep. Glad she’s gone! See, this self-deporting stuff can work!

          Liked by 2 people

        • Marygrace Powers says:

          WSB right. Following tells me we’re better off without Brand as well.

          “After leaving the Justice Department, Brand worked for three years at WilmerHale.[2] In 2008, John McCain, then a candidate for the Republican Party’s presidential nomination, named Brand to his Justice Advisory Committee, which would have recommended judicial nominees to McCain were he elected.[14]”

          Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (2012–2017)[edit]

          “In 2012, Brand was appointed by President Barack Obama to serve on the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB).[15] She was confirmed on August 2, 2012 to a term ending January 29, 2017.[16]

          Brand dissented from several recommendations included in the PCLOB’s 2014 report on NSA’s bulk metadata collection program under section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act. She declined to join in the Board’s view that the program was illegal as a statutory matter and argued that, in policy terms, it struck a justifiable balance between privacy and national security and, as such, should not be discontinued.[17] The Board, for its part, had recommended the program’s termination.
          term ending January 29, 2017.[16]”

          Liked by 1 person

      • litlbit2 says:

        Remember. “Keep your friends close and your enemies closer”

        Liked by 2 people

    • Thecleaner says:

      Rumor has it that Rosenstein will recommend that Eric Holder take her place

      Liked by 2 people

  40. AH_C says:

    Drip, drip, drip. The deep state is going stir crazy as we continue to slowly but surely peel back every layer to their corruption.

    Most gloat worthy is that we’re going after every enabling govt worker, rendering their entire career moot. We’ll get the politicians too, but first we make a severe example of bureaucrats that would be kings. Others will think twice, then think again before attempting to collude with anyone that would usurp the constitution.

    Liked by 3 people

  41. Bill says:

    I believe, it’s important to point out that if the FIAC member(s) are involved in the corruption. Then Goodlatte can not expect. to see the transcript released or a pure underacted transcript.

    Goodlatte action, will at best lower the probability of a “fake transcript” being presented to him.

    “[*NOTE: We cannot confirm but strongly suspect – due to DOJ conduct and ongoing DOJ motives, Goodlatte wants to rule-out the possibility of two versions: an original application to the FISC, and an application the DOJ may have modified for congressional review. Hence, Goodlatte wants to see the application in the hands of the court.]”


  42. Bill says:

    Side note: the FBI & DOJ subordinates knew allot about this. I would fire so many at the HQ FBI & DOJ one time “it would go down in history”.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s