Sunday Talks: Lindsey Graham -vs- John Dickerson…

Senator Lindsey Graham appears on Face The Nation with John Dickerson to discuss the current state of the swamp.

“I think he [Comey] made some decisions that were really very, very wrong. There’s an ongoing criminal investigation; Comey may be part of it. You tweet and comment regarding ongoing criminal investigations at your own peril. I’d be careful if I were you, Mr. President. I’d watch this.”

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Deep State, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, FBI, media bias, N Korea, President Trump, propaganda, Uncategorized, USA. Bookmark the permalink.

156 Responses to Sunday Talks: Lindsey Graham -vs- John Dickerson…

  1. Trumpstumper says:

    Miss Lindsey has a concern.


    Liked by 28 people

  2. Rex says:

    With apologies to the people that raised me right… !@#$ Lindsey Grahamnesty and the horse he rode in on.

    Liked by 22 people

  3. lilann2012 says:

    Seriously, Lindsey thinks he can “scare” President rump into not tweeting? LMAO! I believe Lindsey’s “peril” is at stake, not President Trumps!

    Liked by 9 people

  4. phoenixRising says:

    Good gosh, Miss Lindsey’s face is sooo red!!!!

    Liked by 5 people

  5. Mitro Roman says:

    I can see it coming. Corrupt and conflicted Mueller and his leftist gang are going to try to get a bogus charge on Trump (obstruction of justice?) so that the swamp can impeach him. Mueller already set up a kangaroo court in D.C. where the jury is almost all Dems and the judge is an Obama appointee.

    It will be up to the American people to speak out and tell Congress Republicans that whoever votes for impeachment will be voted out of Congress and will be known as a traitor. The swamp is deep, it’s corrupt, and they don’t care about the truth or fairness. I hope I’m wrong, but doubt it.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Rex says:

      We won the soap box.
      We won the ballot box.
      If necessary, we will win the cartridge box as well.

      Liked by 21 people

    • kittytrump84 says:

      Don’t worry. You are wrong.

      Liked by 7 people

    • trialbytruth says:

      Throw in their kids will never get a parking space within 10 miles of their dad’s federal prison and we got a deal

      Liked by 6 people

    • MAGADJT says:

      I think you’re way off on this. Graham and Co know what would happen if they voted to impeach. They would all be harangued and voted out of office. That being said, I am somewhat concerned that the strategy is for the GOP to lose the House and Senate in the mid-terms and then Dems can impeach. It does take 3/4 of the Senate to convict, so not sure if that is a realistic concern or not.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Only a crooked fool would sign up as body guard for Grahamnesty or any other Seditious Anti-Trumper during impeachment proceedings.

        Liked by 8 people

      • Blade says:

        It does take 3/4 of the Senate to convict, so not sure if that is a realistic concern or not.

        Senate conviction on an Article Of Impeachment requires 2/3 which is currently 67minimum votes based on 100 voting Senators. So the question really is: Does President Donald Trump have 34 friends in the Senate?.

        This is a massive can of worms for the Constitution and the Republic because a Congress removing a President for other than extraordinary cause resembles a Parliament, which the Federalist Papers and all writings of the Founders show they were trying NOT to establish.

        In such an event We The People would be perfectly in keeping with original intent to descend upon the District Of Criminals and remove the traitors to the Constitution from their cozy offices, and indeed their heads.

        Liked by 6 people

        • eagledriver50 says:

          AND what these douche nozzles don’t realize is that there are ~ 3 MILLION people ready to descend on that little enclave called Washington DC to rid the capital of the stench that permeates the hollowed halls of congress…AND THAT IS WHY WE HAVE THE 2ND AMENDMENT!!!

          Liked by 2 people

          • doit4atlas says:

            All along the watchtower, princes kept the view
            While all the women came and went, barefoot servants, too
            Outside in the distance a wildcat did growl
            Two riders were approaching, the wind began to howl

            Liked by 4 people

        • jmclever says:

          Remember, it was a unanimous vote that included Republicans that blocked President Trump from making ANY recess appointments. I will assume that Our Lion has NO friends in Congress.

          Liked by 1 person

        • obviously the process of impeachment would be massively damaging – but hey, bill miraculously survived…

          it’s all a cartoon if you ask me ;o


      • Sharon says:

        If you watch some of Kim Clements prophecy’s he had one I think it was 2009 prediction that Trump would be president and they will say impeach impeach impeach but it will not happen he said! Too bad Kim passed away in November 2016 I think after the election anyway! But his wife and others still run the ministry called House of Destiny!

        Liked by 1 person

        • Indimex says:

          I loved Kim Clement, and was truly sad when he died. I believe he was 100% Holy Spirit led. I did not realize that he prophesied about Trump. Thank you for mentioning that. I’m going to look it up.


      • Sentient says:

        I believe it’s 2/3 to convict/remove, not 3/4.


    • POP says:

      No you’re not wrong.
      That’s the general gist of what’s planned, with variations.
      They MUST nail the President, another 7 years of PTrump and their crony State will be unrecognisable.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Nobody is going to trump up charges that would lead to impeachment. That is not going to happen. They do not possess the power to bring forth charges of impeachable wrongdoing because they’d have to concoct the evidence, create the criminal conspiracy & obstruction charges out of whole cloth. Then they’d have to go back in time to the campaign & use current Trump campaign, now Trump Administration, officials to do it.

      Fact: you cannot go back in time. It is impossible to change what has already happened.

      We’re talking about the Deep State trying to impeach an innocent sitting President. This President did not commit any crimes. He is exercising his Constitutional Rights as President of the United States. He has not solicited bribes, sold state secrets or ordered anyone to lie. Nor did he collude with the Russians (not a crime, btw). There is nothing there.

      The Deep State is cornered & about to be dismantled & they damn well know it. That’s all this is about. We The People sent a new President armed with our wrecking balls to implode their corrupt House of Cards. They are finished! Let the perp walks, indictments, trials & imprisonments begin!

      Liked by 6 people

      • i believe you may be celebrating prematurely ;O


      • Benson II says:

        Talking about it continually is meant to bolster their creds for their election cycles coming up. No matter how sincere their hopes are I don’t see a final product. That doesn’t mean they won’t keep saying it along with all the other accusations from their fellow travelers in the press. I expect no let up from any of them until we the public exert our powers to stop them, politically with votes and financially with the press.


      • POP says:

        They don’t have to win a vote to impeach PTrump, all they have to do is keep the sense of impending impeachment crisis fresh every day to implant the idea of guilt in 5% of the electorate’s minds. They do that with a permanent anti Trump Special Counsel, the confected “offence” is almost irrelevant.

        Nailing Mueler is a very good idea. Uranium 1 or his association with Comey will do.


    • totally agree – it’s coming, but it won’t be any big ugly
      the President is in imminent danger…

      it’s how i read the acceleration and tenor of his Tweets, which are not reflecting any quantum shift in the swamp’s relentless assault on him or imminent victory for the good guys

      or it could be simply more of this extended swamp mind control CARTOON that we’ve ALL (honest working conservative and liberal TAXPAYERS alike) been brutally subjected to for the last almost TWO years…

      Think of the TRILLIONS that ALL and especially the thug puppet attack dog MSM has RAKED IN on the back of it – the failed careers resurrected – the DOPEY “liberal” late light “comedians”/deep state operatives – the DIS-INFO “conservative” pundits like DOPEY mark levin or web sites like breitbart

      it’s certainly possible that their intention is to milk this cash cow for the next 7 years and beyond…

      in either case – those with eyes open need to be VIGILANT


  6. RedBallExpress says:

    Well according to the domino theory Hillary is going to push Obama on his face whether he has a birth certificate or not. I can’t wait.

    Liked by 4 people

  7. JC says:

    Well then… nothing puts the damper on Christmas spirit like seeing and hearing these two freak show bohemes in an interview. Pompous, utterly irrelevant prigs wasting everyone’s time. Fire, meet gasoline.

    Liked by 4 people

  8. deplorabledaveinsocal says:

    Smoke ‘em if you got ‘em… this is going to get interesting. I am getting addicted to all the goings on… Just thinking of Christmas with visions of handcuffs and shackles…

    Liked by 9 people

  9. Troublemaker10 says:

    Yep, Dems are desperate. They have nothing….so are creating obstruction out of nothing

    Liked by 8 people

  10. Binkser1 says:

    Poor Lindsey has the vapors again and has his panties in a bunch.

    Liked by 5 people

  11. mikebrezzze says:

    Who’s is Lindsey’s boyfriend?

    Liked by 2 people

  12. POP says:

    Linds is trying to find a way for Comey to walk.

    Liked by 3 people

  13. benifranlkin says:

    Why is Linda Graham talking like this? How does he know there is an ongoing criminal investigation? I doubt the the President knows. Is Graham saying the President does know and this is why he shouldn’t be tweeting? Or does Graham just not like his tweets? Why can’t the President defend himself?

    Liked by 2 people

    • LBB says:

      After being told so many times by officials that we can’t talk about an ongoing case, I was a bit surprised about all he offered.
      On the tweet, I wasn’t sure if he was legitimately warning PDJT because of a line that could be crossed that would get him in trouble with protocol, law , definitions.
      Graham did like the whole NK scene.
      Graham seemed to change when he found out about McCain’s cancer. Maybe he is starting to awaken too.

      Liked by 1 person

  14. Founding Fathers Fan says:

    Graham only knows that constitutional is a walk to stimulate a bowel movement. Its also a euphemism for a bowel movement. (From a time when using the bathroom meant going for a walk to the outhouse–the original meaning was still “going for a walk”, but this idea was used in the euphemism for going to the bathroom.)

    Liked by 3 people

  15. kinthenorthwest says:

    You talking about this Crazed Lindsay Graham.

    Liked by 2 people

  16. Frank says:

    Lindsey Graham is just another lawyer representing his swamp client. He needs to be replaced with a true MAGA-minded nationalist.

    Just thinking out loud here:
    Years ago, there was a British show put out by the BBC called “Yes, Minister” which followed the misadventures of an MP and his support staff. The MP was elected to the position and would only be there for X number of years, but his support staff would remain for decades. Naturally, a lot of the show’s humor revolved around the MP and his staff having diametrically opposed agendas – one wanting to satisfy the voting public and the other wanting to satisfy the entrenched civil servants union.

    So it goes here in the US. Congressmen are like our MPs, and all those thousands of staffers at dozens of institutions are the support staff. Even if we replace all the congressmen with nationalists – and we should! – there’s still the problem of excising the cancer of unelected back-stabbers in the State Department, DOJ, and the IC writ large. It took decades for these hacks to worm their way into the system and start selling off bits of it to China and various muslim tribes. How long will it take to remove them? Do you think it can be done inside of a single decade? I admit I don’t know enough about US politics to guess, let alone know if there’s any precedent for this kind of situation.

    Liked by 3 people

  17. Tossed Salad says:

    I guess we will know it when he tweets the wrong tweet because the knives will come from a million directions


  18. starfcker says:

    This must be getting serious. Dickerson is in a panic. And twisting and turning trying to keep the narrative going for all it’s worth. And failing miserably. Lindsey Graham didn’t break a sweat

    Liked by 2 people

  19. MAGADJT says:

    Sundance – What is the risk of the Obstruction of Justice investigation? Is that just blowhard-ish chaff and countermeasures? Or, even though we know it is not true, is there some real risk to some manufactured consequences for POTUS here?

    Liked by 1 person

    • G. Combs says:

      It would be a ‘He said– He said’ between Comey and President Trump, with Comey having given his supposed notes of the meeting ILLEGALLY to his Prof. friend to pass on to the MSM.

      Comey LEAKING those notes was breaking the law. If President Trump actually recorded the meeting and Comey LIED, then Comey is in really deep doo doo. (A very real possibility.)

      Also there was ZERO reason for President Trump to request Comey to go gently on Flynn. He is the president and therefore can PARDON Flynn.
      On top of that the President did not ORDER or DEMAND or THREATEN Comey to get him to leave Flynn alone as Lynch/Obama might have done in the case of Hillary Clinton.

      [USC04] 18 USC Ch. 73: OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE seems to indicate obstruction is not a request but an order with a threat behind it.

      Ҥ1503. Influencing or injuring officer or juror generally

      (a) Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing magistrate, in the discharge of his duty, or injures any such grand or petit juror in his person or property on account of any verdict or indictment assented to by him, or on account of his being or having been such juror, or injures any such officer, magistrate judge, or other committing magistrate in his person or property on account of the performance of his official duties, or corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b). If the offense under this section occurs in connection with a trial of a criminal case, and the act in violation of this section involves the threat of physical force or physical force, the maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for the offense shall be the higher of that otherwise provided by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in such case…..

      (6) the term “corruptly persuades” does not include conduct which would be misleading conduct but for a lack of a state of mind.

      (b) As used in section 1505, the term “corruptly” means acting with an improper purpose, personally or by influencing another, including making a false or misleading statement, or withholding, concealing, altering, or destroying a document or other information.”


      Here is the word Corruptly—Defined by the NINTH CIRCUS err circuit court for jury instruction:


  20. Song Writers: How about a new version of the 12 Days of Christmas with Corrupticon Groups.

    “On the 12th day of Christmas, The Donald gave to me …”

    Liked by 6 people

  21. fleporeblog says:

    From the article linked above:

    But despite a dearth of confirmed assistant attorneys general and other aides, Mr. Sessions has largely succeeded in shutting down much of the Obama-era leftism that was so alive in the Justice Department when he got there and setting it on a Reagan-like path.

    In a front-page story just last week, a Washington Post headline announced that “While eyes are on Russia, Sessions dramatically reshapes the Justice Department,” going on to say that “the attorney general has been among the most effective of the Cabinet secretaries — implementing Trump’s conservative policy agenda even as the president publicly and privately toys with firing him over his decision to recuse himself from the Russia case.”

    His supporters, according to The Post, “say Sessions has restored a by-the-book interpretation of federal law and taken an aggressive stance toward enforcing it.”

    One of those supporters is Ronald Reagan’s Attorney General Ed Meese. I asked Mr. Meese about what he thought of Mr. Sessions’ tenure to Justice so far. “During his relatively short time in office,” Mr. Meese told me, “Jeff Sessions has already achieved a remarkable list of accomplishments. He has restored integrity to the Office of Attorney General and reasserted fidelity to the Constitution.

    Regarding criminal justice, Mr. Sessions has returned the department to actually prosecuting and locking up criminal offenders — based on the notion — outlandish to the left — that effective policing and incarceration are key to reducing crime and protecting the public rather than the Obama campaign of reducing the prison population as much as possible.

    Justice, like most of the other Cabinet departments, remains short-handed in terms of confirmed assistant attorneys general, although there is a long line waiting for the Senate to act. Once they are all in place, conservatives can rest assured that they will have no better friend in the Trump administration than Jeff Sessions. Even without those assistants, in fact, they already do.

    Liked by 23 people

    • piper567 says:

      Thank you flepore…big thanks.

      Liked by 4 people

    • cwf60 says:

      Mr. Sessions should be prosecuting and locking up those whose crimes come to light daily from the former Obama administration and deep state. That would be something to applaud.

      Liked by 2 people

    • POP says:

      “He has restored integrity to the Office of Attorney General and reasserted fidelity to the Constitution.”
      His PR firm?

      Sessions won’t even insist the DoJ complies with a Congressional subpoena. A subpoena with great advantages for PTrump.
      What a crock.

      Liked by 2 people

      • a DEEP STATE crock of poo, yes


      • G. Combs says:

        Pop wants the DOJ to comply with a subpoena from the SWAMP. A subpoena that does nothing but disperse what ever evidence the DOJ may have looked at or maybe looking for to the rest of the SWAMP.

        A subpoena that does NOTHING except tell the Swamp exactly what Trump’s Plans are.

        A Subpoena from the SAME SWAMP CRITTERS that FAILED in causing indictments for:
        Fast and Furious
        Clinton’s email server
        and any and all other kabuki theatre the swamp has put on.

        “Secret operations are essential in war; upon them the army relies to make its every move.” — Sun Tzu


  22. woohoowee says:

    This tweet ties in?

    *This tweet is no longer in Holdup’s twitter timeline.

    June 30, 2017


    Eric Holder, Obama’s former Attorney General and a man who recently hinted at an interest in pursuing a 2020 bid for the White House, issued a rather ominous warning to the “career men & women” of the DOJ/FBI last night saying that their “actions and integrity will be unfairly questioned” before calling upon them to “be prepared, be strong.”

    “To the career men & women at DOJ/FBI: your actions and integrity will be unfairly questioned. Be prepared, be strong. Duty. Honor. Country.”

    Eric Holder

    To the career men & women at DOJ/FBI: your actions and integrity will be unfairly questioned. Be prepared, be strong. Duty. Honor. Country.

    1:17 AM – Jun 30, 2017

    6,479 6,479 Replies 30,013 30,013 Retweets 71,731 71,731 likes

    Liked by 3 people

  23. emet says:

    Dear President Trump,
    Any more crying about tweets, sound El Deguello.

    Liked by 1 person

    • suejeanne1 says:

      Also, why didn’t Eric Holder OR Barack Obama have anything to say about the tragic and horrific death of Colleen Hufford in Oklahoma? No, the Obama administration was very busy all of a sudden announcing the resignation of Holder and that’s all the news media wanted to talk about.


    • G. Combs says:

      <b.SEWAGE SCUM! — ALL of them!

      “One of the guns used in the November 13, 2015 Paris terrorist attacks came from Phoenix, Arizona where the Obama administration allowed criminals to buy thousands of weapons illegally in a deadly and futile “gun-walking” operation known as “Fast and Furious.”

      A Report of Investigation (ROI) filed by a case agent in the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF) tracked the gun used in the Paris attacks to a Phoenix gun owner who sold it illegally, “off book,” Judicial Watch’s law enforcement sources confirm. Federal agents tracing the firearm also found the Phoenix gun owner to be in possession of an unregistered fully automatic weapon, according to law enforcement officials with firsthand knowledge of the investigation.

      The investigative follow up of the Paris weapon consisted of tracking a paper trail using a 4473 form, which documents a gun’s ownership history by, among other things, using serial numbers. The Phoenix gun owner that the weapon was traced back to was found to have at least two federal firearms violations—for selling one weapon illegally and possessing an unregistered automatic—but no enforcement or prosecutorial action was taken against the individual. Instead, ATF leaders went out of their way to keep the information under the radar and ensure that the gun owner’s identity was “kept quiet,” according to law enforcement sources involved with the case. “Agents were told, in the process of taking the fully auto, not to anger the seller to prevent him from going public,” a veteran law enforcement official told Judicial Watch.[…] “


  24. Deborah @UnTamedInSD says:

    speaking of desperation in the air….

    Liked by 1 person

  25. Tonawanda says:


    1) There has been no evidence of collusion so far. If anyone would have evidence of collusion, it would be Flynn. So we will know “shortly” whether the Russia Narrative should end or not. TRANSLATION: the Russia Narrative will be FINISHED soon.

    2) Trump has the best national security team I have ever seen. TRANSLATION: I was as Never Trump as anyone, but Trump has shown me enough evidence of what he is doing for me to understand I am witnessing a once in a lifetime transformation of American policy into a force for security and global progress.

    3) Unlike the previous decades of Uniparty inaction/incompetence regarding North Korea, Trump is dedicated to doing something. TRANSLATION: Trump will settle this matter definitively, and is going about it in rational, comprehensive and effective way.

    4) Comey may be under investigation. TRANSLATION: Comey is under investigation. IMPLICATION OF TRANSLATION: the swamp is being drained, fasten your seat belts.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Carolina Kat says:

      Excellent summary and my take as well. Comey has been quoting scriptures lately (the fake Christians usually pull this out as a cloak of righteousness, but it is self-righteousness instead) indicating that he knows the end is near. His?

      Likely. They’ve got him. And they might have Mueller too.


      Liked by 1 person

  26. flawesttexas says:

    One thing I have learned from President Trump tweets:

    Folks upset with Trump Tweets do not support him, and do not wish him well…including those who state: “I like Trump, but his tweets…”

    Liked by 9 people

    • Sedanka says:


      Liked by 1 person

    • covfefe999 says:

      Oh I don’t know about that. I’m as supportive of Trump as any other Trump supporter. I was with him from very early on, within a few weeks of him announcing, and I’ve never swayed. But there have been some times (not all) when I wished he hadn’t tweeted a comment. Most of the time I find it very refreshing. 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

    • i’m not sure about not supporting him. Many might in principle – “conservative ideologues” for instance who prioritize conservative POLITICAL agenda over the unique and SINGULAR brilliance of Donald Trump (and his tweeting of course) and the MAGA agenda….you see this “mentality” a lot at breitbart and other troll infested “conservative” sites…or in the Obstruction of MAGA by the “freedom caucus” or Rand Paul – of course straight up “republican” thug puppets like graham, flake, mccain, corker etc…who whine about him tweeting are NEVER Trumpers…

      Anyway, IMO, there’s not a true, DIE HARD Trump supporter, deplorable or otherwise who doesn’t LOVE the President’s tweets – those on the fence or in opposition, SIMPLY don’t GET HIM…yet (hopefully) ;O

      The other important element for “supporters” who criticize his social media strategy to understand, is that by doing so, they ALLIGN themselves politically with EVERY foul Trump HATER in the world, thus ERODING the CRUCIAL SUPPORT HE NEEDS to defend himself against their relentless assault, and the support he needs to Make America Great Again.

      They would do well to at least consider this part…strategically speaking

      Liked by 1 person

    • dayallaxeded says:

      You’re just flat wrong on that point, flawesttexas, especially at the end. Fact is, PDJT’s twatter twittering, while sometimes amusing, sometimes strategic, sometimes revalatory is also sometimes harmful to his stature with the masses as POTUS, and sometimes creates dynamics that prevent, rather than help MAGA. The Bergdahl case is an example. Had PDJT kept his twits on Bergdahl under wraps until after the case was complete, the court martial could’ve hit him much harder. If they had punished him as harshly as we all think they should, he would’ve had a good shot at a reduction or even dismissal of charges based on improper influence from PDJT–even if the court martial officers weren’t really swayed by PDJT’s twittering.

      PDJT was, is, and hopefully will be for another 7+ years Commander in Chief of our military. When he says something about a case that is under active investigation or active prosecution, he prejudices the government’s side of that investigation or prosecution. I believe there was a case in which 0bunghole or some very highly placed officer made a bunch of prejudicial comments that resulted in the case actually being dismissed, b/c the perp couldn’t receive a fair trial under the cloud of a POTUS’ harsh statements.

      That is not how the rule of law works. I do not think that’s what PDJT intends. He comes from a world in which his opinion is just that–his opinion, not an edict from the most powerful political figure in the world. On this, alone, PDJT needs to get a clue and put a filter on it. In addition, I guarantee he would have had many more traditional conservative and socially conservative independent votes, if he’d been just a little more circumspect in his twittering. Many many conservatives were and are offended by some of his “communication style” and it’s at its worst on twatter. Not everyone can stomach the hard reality that we, here in the treehouse, embrace–that PDJT wasn’t our candidate, he was and continues to be our weapon (I’m thinking a mace would be closest analog).


      • that was a whole lot of hot air, when what you meant to say was “I really dislike Donald Trump and wish he hadn’t been elected”
        Good Grief – Trump haters like yourself, liberal or conservative DEFINE the word disingenuous…
        it’s breathtaking, really ‘O’


  27. scarlettbr says:

    The senator seemed to threaten the President. I don’t trust the deep state to do the right thing. They are banking on Flynn to disclose a hidden Russian secret covert operation in the campaign. Flynn, now a Court Certified Convicted Liar, is who they are trusting to tell the truth? This should be concerning to everyone. Meanwhile, there is enough evidence on Hillary and others to send to jail, yet they are arresting Flynn, for a lie told AFTER the election? Shady.


  28. pawatcher says:

    Graham doesn’t get it: We the People sent a majority to our House, a majority to our Senate and Trump to DC to provide US with transparency, which includes all the good, bad, and ugly happenings that are taking place behind closed doors that We can’t open- in our own houses- and that are robbing US of our God given equal rights.
    The doors will open, the shadows will disappear: We have moore door bangers on the way to DC to help Trump. Not for sensationalism, for real light so We can see into the corners and clean them out (I say that as a devoted housewife who loves to clean).
    The days are gone when politicians can say they know what’s best for the People, and keep the People out of the workings of government.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. covfefe999 says:

    That was a great interview. Very objective. I wonder if CBS invited him because they thought he would trash Trump and he ended up doing just the opposite. The worst thing Graham said about Trump was IF there had been collusion Flynn is the guy who would know about it. That effectively shut Dickerson down on that topic. Everything else was supportive, Thanks Senator Graham!

    Liked by 1 person

  30. SO SICK of swamp reptile graham babbling…and WARNING the President about anything

    I wouldn’t call this graham VERSUS dickerson…

    more like: swamp thug puppet globalist psychopath and dopey attack dog globalist psychopath media operative, MASSAGE each other tenderly

    what else is new?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Saveedra says:

      Does Graham seriously think President Trump listens to or would ever take his advice? Graham is a sissified, slimey swamp cretin. Trump tweets to his base with the knowledge the Swamp takes his every tweet literally; disecting each each to find fault with him.


  31. Mickturn says:

    Seems every time Pres Trump hits the nail on the head the usual suspects from the Deep State crawl out from under their rocks and shoot off their mouths. Nothing new here. I just with the prosecutions of all the perps went much faster!


  32. Daniel says:

    The top law enforcement agencies are a duty to remain 100% scandal free. This is why we have rules and LAWS about recusal based not on ‘factual’ conflicts of interest, but of possible perceptions of conflicts of interest.

    It is the “possible perceptions” standard which has been broken in every which way in all of this.

    To say that the FBI and Justice department are in tatters is not an overstatement. It is an understatement. The public trust in the government is absolutely dependent on the government rigidly adhering to its own standards. Idiots are expected to make exceptions for when “our side” is doing it versus “their side” doing it. Organizations like “By Any Means Necessary” are based on such a lack of principles.

    Many people believe we should be reclassified as a third world government until this is rectified. This should not be allowed to stand. That Republicans and Democrats feel this is tolerable pretty well illustrates what they think of this country and the rule of law.

    Liked by 1 person

  33. Steve in Lewes says:

    Hey Linda, “Go away, little girl”


  34. ADDgolfer says:

    I believe Dowd, the President’s lawyer is concerned they will take the tweet made over the weekend of suggestion Trump knew Flynn lied.
    Dowd claimed he was formatting Trumps tweet, first and last time he said he will do that. It was he who did the tweet.
    I certainly hope they don’t try that bovine excrement. I’m wanting Mueller to be honorable as a Marine should be in this investigation.


  35. Bob says:

    I bet Trump is listening to Graham’s advice and takes it very seriously.



  36. Founding Fathers Fan says:

    Low voter turnout in SC for Lindsey Graham is pathetic as 85% of republicans didn’t even bother to vote in the Senate primary.


  37. All American Snowflake says:

    I read that as “Fake the Nation.” A Freudian Slip, don’t you know….

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s