House Intelligence Committee Leaks Ben Rhodes as “Person of Interest” in Unmasking Scandal…

There’s another “explosive” and “exclusive” article from the latest chaf and countermeasures unit, Sara Carter, reporting Ben Rhodes as a “subject of interest” for the House Intelligence Committee’s investigation into ‘unethical’ and possibly ‘illegal’ unmasking.

Understandably all discussion, and likely a large segment of Sean Hannity’s TV show, will focus on the intended target of the newly drawn attention. However, what’s more interesting to those who look into the deep swamp is the identification of Carter’s sources: ie. who’s feeding her?

according to congressional sources who spoke with Circa.”

Track down who those people are – and you’ll identify the motives therein. And I can guarantee you it has nothing to do with bringing justice upon the ‘unethical‘ and potentially ‘illegal‘ activity.

Remember, the staffers -writ large- for the House Intelligence Committee are people like the Awan Brothers crew.  Generally speaking the entire congressional staff, including the staffers with security clearances inside Intelligence Committees etc., are sympathetic to the interests of the Swamp, it’s simply a self-interest aspect.


“All these worlds are yours, except Europa; attempt no landing there.” –VIDEO

…Where Europa is the swamp, the messenger is Deep State, and the intended recipient is the Trump administration.  Oh well, here’s the article:

CIRCA – Former Obama White House National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes is now an emerging as a person of interest in the House Intelligence Committee’s unmasking investigation, according to a letter sent Tuesday by the committee to the National Security Agency (NSA).

This adds Rhodes to the growing list of top Obama government officials who may have improperly unmasked Americans in communications intercepted overseas by the NSA, Circa has confirmed.

The House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-CA, sent the letter to the National Security Agency requesting the number of unmaskings made by Rhodes from Jan. 1, 2016 to Jan. 20, 2017, according to congressional sources who spoke with Circa.

Rhodes, who worked closely with former National Security Adviser Susan Rice and was a former deputy national security adviser for strategic communications for President Obama, became a focus of the committee during its review of classified information to assess whether laws were broken regarding NSA intercepted communications of President Trump, members of his administration and other Americans before and after the election, according to congressional officials. The committee is requesting that the NSA deliver the information on Rhodes by August, 21.

Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power, Rice and former CIA Director John Brennan have all been named in the House Intelligence Committee’s investigation into the unmasking of Americans. A letter sent last week from Nunes to Dan Coats, the director of National Intelligence, suggested that top Obama aides made hundreds of unmasking requests during the 2016 presidential elections.

The story, which was first reported by The Hill last week, stated that the requests were made without specific justifications as to why the unmasking was necessary. Rice and Brennan have confirmed they sought the unredacted names of Americans in NSA-sourced intelligence reports but insisted their requests were routine parts of their work and had no nefarious intentions. Power also has legal authority to unmask officials, though the practice has not reportedly been common for someone in her position. Rhodes also had legal authority to unmask Americans in NSA-source intelligence reports. But intelligence and congressional sources question the extent of the unmasking.  (read more)

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Jeff Sessions, Legislation, media bias, President Trump, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

198 Responses to House Intelligence Committee Leaks Ben Rhodes as “Person of Interest” in Unmasking Scandal…

  1. NJF says:

    Oh God. Can onky imagine what garbage this guy will spew.

    The comments are mind blowing bc none of them will watch unless Jeffrey Lord is fired. Prefer MSNBC bc, that station evidently never has an R/GOP person on their shows. Oh and Clapper is a paragon of virtue to these people.


    Liked by 2 people

  2. Juan says:

    Yawn ! Another “bombshell’ according to the pundits. It’s become laughable. The sun will rise in the east & the swamp creatures will still roam free … tomorrow, the next day & every day thereafter. When there’s an indictment, I’ll become excited … not before.

    Liked by 5 people

  3. Alison says:

    From what I’ve read, the House Intell Cmte is not asking who was masked & why; they are focused on why the current ‘protocols’ didn’t require more stringent reasons to request an unmasking.

    In fact, hasn’t some representative already proposed legislation to tighten up the protocols?

    In other words, they will conclude the prior admin isn’t at fault; rather it was faulty protocols. They will then reassure us that measures have been taken to prevent that ‘inadvertent’ miscarriage against American citizens from occurring again.

    Right . . .

    At this point, I wish President Trump would release the names of every citizen whose name was unmasked for whatever reason. Or alternatively notify every citizen who was unmasked & let that citizen decide whether to let the rest of us know.

    This cannot, and must not, be allowed to be brushed off as ‘faulty protocols’.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. How could Rhodes have authority he had no security clearance

    Liked by 2 people

  5. How could Rhodes have authority he had no security clearance


  6. Brant says:

    I’m at the point where I want to see some real rock em sock em robot action. It does seem like (or I hope) it’s starting to become a real battle royale. A real MMA match. I am confident if our side would get in the game, we would win. Threre has to be a way to get across to the do nothings that if the Dims and deep state (I repeat myself) take Trump out, their little cushy jobs as losers will also probably be taken from them.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. citizen817 says:

    Agree with Sundance. More chaf and countermeasures here. Just 4 days ago,
    Sara Carter came out with “James Baker is allegedly under criminal investigation.”
    So who is feeding these stories to Sara Carter?

    Liked by 2 people

    • Tutumuch says:

      I just said as much to my husband tonight. Sara Carter is an amazing reporter, but from WHOM is she getting her info?!? All these WH reporters seem to have “sources” but no one calls them “leakers”? Hmmmm🤔🤔🤔

      Liked by 3 people

      • wolfmoon1776 says:

        It’s an interesting (to me) possibility that these “good-for-Trump leaks” are designed to get us all thinking favorably about leakers, so that we “go easy” or “accept no punishment” (i.e., flak and countermeasures, with zero downed planes) on those who were (1) leaking to Hillary during the Obama administration, and (2) those who were leaking just recently to the MSM.

        Liked by 6 people

  8. Proud Texan says:

    What is the chance that Seth Rich was one of the people who was unmasked? Did Nunes see his name when he supposedly turned white as a ghost?
    Someone over on Reddit the Donald is asking that question.

    Liked by 4 people

    • wolfmoon1776 says:

      It’s entirely possible, and explains something. It explains WHY the left would engage in a truly craven act.

      There is a bit of disinformation out there right now, where the Dems and Obama Deep State are trying to link Seth Rich and that Russian V-skaya chick. Nasty! Obviously they’re trying to muck up the Seth Rich angle and get it far away, using it to tarnish their opponents.

      So, if Seth Rich DOES come up in the unmasking, THAT will likely be the spin.

      HOWEVER, I think there may be a very specific reason to do this.

      One needs to understand how this intelligence was being abused. Part of MUH RUSSIA is to provide plausibility for political spying by the Obama administration. SO, my feeling is that they know Seth Rich is in there, and were trying to keep tabs on him, and have all along made him part of MUH RUSSIA to justify what they did. So the disinformation now is a kind of consciousness of guilt on Seth Rich.

      Russia was an all-purpose bogeyman to justify spying. It’s very cynical, and only bunch of horrible old Soviet assets like Obama, Rice, Jarrett and Clinton, wallowing in reversal of personal narrative their whole lives, could come up with something so nasty but effective. But it WAS very effective, as the easily gaslit Evelyn Farkas – who was right next to these leftist creeps and never suspected a thing – shows us.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Patriot1783 says:

      Maybe Nunes saw Seth Rich name and a number of other names he recognized as victims of recent murders, suicides, accidental deaths…

      Liked by 1 person

  9. rainy973 says:

    Ben Rhodes the architect of the Susan Rice Benghazi video talking points/lies.

    Liked by 3 people

  10. Imran Awan Becomes Suspect in Seth Rich Murder Inquiry



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s