Massive Contradiction – John Brennan Completely Contradicts FBI Director James Comey on Congressional Notification…

BUSTED !!

Today former CIA Director John Brennan testified to congress on the Russian counter-intelligence operation which began in July 2016.  Today, John Brennan completely contradicted the March 20th, 2017, testimony of former FBI Director James Comey.

We have previously drawn attention to a particular part of former FBI Director James Comey’s testimony to congress from March 20th.  The issue is when was congressional leadership, specifically the congressional intelligence oversight group called the “Gang-of-Eight”, notified of the Russian investigation (a counter-intelligence operation).

Pay close attention.  On March 20th FBI Director James Comey -together with NSA head Admiral Mike Rogers- testified to congress specifically about this notification (first three minutes of the video):

Rep. Stefanik: [01:12] …”when did you notify the White House, the DNI or congressional leadership”?

James Comey: …”good question.  Congressional leadership, sometime recently they were briefed on the nature of the investigation, as I said.  Obviously the department of justice has been aware of it all along”…

Watch the first 3 minutes of that video.  Notice the discomfort etc.  We have previously outlined why THAT is such a big deal –SEE HERE–  Comey is discussing the recent notification to congress that took place approximately a week earlier.  Prior to that congressional notification FBI Director Comey admits to keeping congress in the dark “because of the sensitivity of the matter” from July 2016 through March 2017.

Now, watch the opening statement from former CIA Director John Brennan today:

Pay very close attention to the segment at 13:35 of this video of Brennan’s testimony:

Brennan: [13:35]  “Third, through the so-called Gang-of-Eight process we kept congress apprised of these issues as we identified them.”

“Again, in consultation with the White House, I PERSONALLY briefed the full details of our understanding of Russian attempts to interfere in the election to congressional leadership; specifically: Senators Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, Dianne Feinstein and Richard Burr; and to representatives Paul Ryan, Nancy Pelosi, Devin Nunes and Adam Schiff between 11th August and 6th September [2016], I provided the same briefing to each of the gang of eight members.”

“Given the highly sensitive nature of what was an active counter-intelligence case [that means the FBI], involving an ongoing Russian effort, to interfere in our presidential election, the full details of what we knew at the time were shared only with those members of congress; each of whom was accompanied by one senior staff member.”…

Brennan goes on to say the main substance of those Go8 meetings was the same as the main judgements of the January classified and unclassified intelligence assessments published by the CIA, FBI, DNI and NSA (intelligence community).

That January reference was the infamous 17 agencies report, from CIA (Brennan), DNI (Clapper), FBI (Comey) and NSA (Rogers), all who had confidence, according to the report, that Russia was attempting to interfere in the 2016 election.

Now, a critic might think that Brennan is informing congress on one thing, and Comey is NOT INFORMING congress on another.  However, that angle is rebuked by Brennan’s own testimony that his specific intelligence product (CIA) was given to the FBI who were exclusively in charge of the “counter-intelligence investigation“.

What’s happening here is actually John Brennan throwing James Comey under the bus.

Dan has encapsulated it nicely in this paragraph:

[…] Brennan gave Comey the investigative product -which had nothing to do with the Trump team-  and Comey used it to carry out Obama, Hillary, and Susan Rice’s dirty work for them. Of course Brennan was in on the whole thing and is now saving his own skin by saying ” I briefed ya’ll on everything I had with regards to Russia, anything additional that arose please talk to my buddy Comey”.

Brennan is making Comey own the “Counter-Intelligence ‘Muh Russia'” claims about the Trump campaign.  Brennan trying to make Comey the fall-guy for a Robert Mueller investigative outcome.  Brennan knows there’s no ‘there’ there.

The entire construct of the “Russian Investigation” was the political use of a claimed investigation in order to weaken President-Elect Trump.  There simply is no ‘there’ there because there’s no substantive evidence to support a “Trump Campaign Collusion Narrative”.

As such, John Brennan has realized that someone has focused attention on Comey’s admission to congress that the FBI intentionally kept congress in the dark during the construct of the counter-intel narrative.  Congress was kept in the dark during this phase because the narrative can only thrive with innuendo, rumor, gossip etc.   The appearance of the investigation itself was the political need; the substance was non-existent and immaterial to the creation of the narrative.

If Comey notified congress, via the Gang of Eight oversight, the counter-intel narrative would have been harder to manufacture as details would have to be consistent.  That’s the benefit to keeping any oversight away while creating the politically useful narrative.

John Brennan, facing the looming certainty of the underlying Russian ‘collusion evidence’ being non-existent, is now trying to give the appearance that he briefed congress on larger Russian election interference issues.  However , the trouble for Brennan is his own admission that these issues were the underlying principle for the FBI counter-intelligence investigation.  Brennan specifically says he gave his intelligence product to the FBI.

Brennan is throwing Comey under the bus and attempting to create plausible deniability for his role in a constructing a political narrative; a false narrative.

WATCH THE RETREAT:

.

It’s not accidental this Brennan retreat is facilitated by a member of congress John Brennan admits to briefing last year.  Gang-of-Eight member, Adam Schiff.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in CIA, Conspiracy ?, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, FBI, Harry Reid, Jeff Sessions, media bias, President Trump, propaganda, Russia, Sean Spicer, Uncategorized, White House Coverup, Wikileaks. Bookmark the permalink.

608 Responses to Massive Contradiction – John Brennan Completely Contradicts FBI Director James Comey on Congressional Notification…

  1. So who has the scoop on what shocked Nunes to his core?
    Feels like a black hole that needs some definition.

    Liked by 11 people

    • Deplorable Canuck says:

      I’ve seen one theory…..KimDotcom was being surveilled by the FBI……..unmasking the names of people he’d been dealing with led to a certain name popping up….

      Seth Rich……

      This is how his cover was blown as the leaker….

      We know what happened to Seth Rich.

      …..the other conclusion from the unmasking?….Obama must have known about it.

      Liked by 14 people

      • Jenny Hatch says:

        Hannity tonight

        Like

        • James F says:

          The family had 10 months to mourn woth practically no coverage or progress in the investigation.

          I feel bad for them but murder victim’s families do not get to pick and choose evidence pr where it leads.

          This is WAY bigger than anybody’s hurt feelings.

          Liked by 13 people

          • bigsy says:

            Yes, and as bad as I feel for the family, this could also happen to someone else’s kid.

            The focus of the battle now is not allowing this to happen to others. It’s no different then the battle the Remembrance Project has been fighting for years.

            Like

          • The Defiant One says:

            The whole thing doesn’t make sense… either the family is really tired of this (unlikely as they did thank Anons for doing research recently) or they got warned off– as if something worse will happen to them as a whole if this isn’t stopped?

            But I mean what’s the chance of that? Like a robbery where nothing was taken like an expensive watch and cash!

            Liked by 3 people

          • MaineCoon says:

            Sadly, they could be obstructing justice since the murder of Seth is unsolved and his murder needs to be solved due to his DNC connection, ie HRC.

            It’s way past time such Klinton highly-suspect-coincidentally-connected murders be solved.

            Liked by 1 person

          • CleanhouseinDC says:

            Perhaps the family is being pressured to push them to back down. Their is no hard evidence, lots of circumstantial, along with what would appear to be shoddy or lackadaisical police work. It would also be odd if indeed the FBI was involved in any way ina local police matter (the PI the family hired suggested Seth Rich’s laptop is in the hands of then FBI).

            Like

      • Jedi9 says:

        Good on KimDotcom! It was totally BS how the Globalists tried to railroad him!

        Liked by 3 people

      • drdeb says:

        Very fishy…Very Very fishy…Someone is going to prison!

        Liked by 1 person

        • Daniel says:

          Don’t be so certain of that. Corrupt cops ignore evidence handed to them. Corrupt judges refuse to admit evidence by the defense or the plaintiff (whichever is the non-government entity). We’ve seen this over and over in countless other examples. We’ve seen very obvious things upon which law enforcement should be expected to act.

          This is the swamp. We can’t make them to their jobs and when we press the issue, they will act against us. Increasingly, they are doing this out in the open with less and less pretext.

          Liked by 3 people

          • G. Combs says:

            Unfortunately you are correct. It happenned to us. The Cops even caught the guy with our semi-truck parked in front of his house on his property but the DA said there was not enough evidence… WTF!!!

            His partner had our other truck and trailer in his locked fenced in yard and even though we had the title the cops told us WE would go to jail if we tried to recover it.

            We lost our entire live saving to these two low-lifes and the courts and cops HELPED them.

            Liked by 1 person

      • Howie says:

        David Huebner US Ambassador to New Zealand and his spouse 12/09 to 1/14

        Like

      • Howie says:

        So did Brennan ask US Ambassador in New Zealand to unmask Seth Rich to New Zealand authorities in relation to the DOJ going after Kim Dot Com at the request of Hollyweird?

        Like

      • eagledriver50 says:

        Question is: How would KitDotCom come up on the intelligence services or fbi radar? That is the more important question. If he DID NOT come up, then Seth Rich would still be alive. There is something more in the NSA/FBI records that people are letting on. One of the pieces of software that is on the market right now is the ability to connect different aspects of a document and get a clearer picture of trying to understand it. Since Rogers was head of NSA under brown stain, (exact dates can be obtained later), then that just leaves the CIA as the organization that has the RAW computing power to come up “connect-the-dots” scenario. The collusion is VERY thick between Breenan and Clapper…and Comey being thrown under the bus just became expendable.
        Note: I understand that a lot of people are trying to “connect-the-dots” but the only way to connect the dots properly and in a short time frame from the raw data that was being collected by the intelligence agencies is too use the raw mainframe computing power and this is the ONLY thing that makes sense. And the people that can share data are the FBI and CIA…

        Like

    • Bassplayer says:

      Maybe Seth Rich was unmasked and Nunes saw his name among others.

      Liked by 7 people

    • ALEX says:

      Rep.King(R-NY) said Nunez told him it read like a private detective report…Things on family members or daily meetings, basically completely inappropriate details considering this was about collusion and what not…

      The republicans have become the enablers of the collision meme for now, but if you listen to Gowdy he is pushing the unmasking from the same angle Nunes was…That is not going away…

      This entire episode shows the spineless nature of republicans though…I’m sickened…

      Liked by 23 people

    • Oncefired says:

      Sign the Petition to get a Special Prosecutor Appointed to Investigate the Seth Rich Murder…IMPORTANT, will kill the Russia Narrative!

      https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/appoint-special-prosecutor-investigate-murder-seth-rich-alleged-wikileaks-email-leaker

      Liked by 3 people

    • panda4justice says:

      His name was Seth Rich. Fried Rice and Obummer unmasked SR’s conversations with Kim.com and the DNC took him out for leaking their emails.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Howie says:

        Canuck Theory haz good points. Some there is here. Just can’t put finger on it.
        Hollywood asks DOJ to go after KDC on copyright case
        DOJ ever faithful to Hollyweird does so and truis to cook up a criminal case charges KDC and tries to extradite him
        Brennan and Rice illegally mine NSA data to help DOJ illegally charge KDC
        KDC fights extradition in NZ court
        Brennan asks NZ ambassador to leak illegal evidence to NZ authority
        KDC wins his case in NZ anyway
        Meanwhile illegally mined data turns up Seth Rich
        CIA realizes he is the DNC leaker

        Like

    • deanbrh says:

      Way back when, there was a Whistle Blower who provided 46 hard drives and thousands of written things, so what happened to that? Maybe Nunes knows.

      Like

  2. AmSa/Mx says:

    Obama intel agency secretly conducted illegal searches on Americans for years
    by John Solomon and Sara Carter

    http://circa.com/politics/barack-obamas-team-secretly-disclosed-years-of-illegal-nsa-searches-spying-on-americans

    Liked by 15 people

    • botvinnik says:

      IV.
      The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

      Liked by 12 people

  3. The Raven says:

    Here’s food for thought…

    Did Comey know about Seth Rich BEFORE he was murdered? If so…who did he tell?

    I still say that a lot of answers can be found in Weiners email…

    Liked by 20 people

  4. big bad mike says:

    Hannity Caves on Seth Rich investigation. Typical. Back to OAN.

    Liked by 9 people

  5. Marica says:

    sean just folded…

    Liked by 3 people

  6. The twin Muh Russia and Seth Rich fog machines are doing their best to obscure the real scandal. The Obama domestic spying system has real evidence to chew upon.

    Liked by 15 people

  7. Howie says:

    Oh for the good old days of Abscam, Keating, and the check kiting scandal. They are all criminals now. All of em’

    Liked by 8 people

  8. big bad mike says:

    Went back to OAN and saw Corey Lewandowski being interviewed at the White House. Is he really back? Please let it be true!

    Liked by 4 people

  9. mikebrezzze says:

    Damn that OBAMA, may all of his virgins be ugly !

    Liked by 16 people

  10. The Seth Rich matter has a month and a half window as a shelf life. Unless Dotcom or Assange provides hard documentation proving that Rich was the source by July 10th (anniversary), the case will suffer the fate of past Clinton scandals.

    Something solid has to propel it, otherwise it will join all of the others in trutherland forever.

    Liked by 10 people

    • judyw says:

      Here is statement from KDC where he offers solid evidence and reaches out to Mueller to assure safe passage if he is required to come here to give it:

      I KNOW THAT SETH RICH WAS INVOLVED IN THE DNC LEAK.
      I know this because in late 2014 a person contacted me about helping me to start a branch of the Internet Party in the United States. He called himself Panda. I now know that Panda was Seth Rich.

      Panda advised me that he was working on voter analytics tools and other technologies that the Internet Party may find helpful.

      I communicated with Panda on a number of topics including corruption and the influence of corporate money in politics.

      “He wanted to change that from the inside.”
      I was referring to what I knew when I did an interview with Bloomberg in New Zealand in May 2015. In that interview I hinted that Julian Assange and Wikileaks would release information about Hillary Clinton in the upcoming election.

      The Rich family has reached out to me to ask that I be sensitive to their loss in my public comments. That request is entirely reasonable.

      I have consulted with my lawyers. I accept that my full statement should be provided to the authorities and I am prepared to do that so that there can be a full investigation. My lawyers will speak with the authorities regarding the proper process.

      If my evidence is required to be given in the United States I would be prepared to do so if appropriate arrangements are made. I would need a guarantee from Special Counsel Mueller, on behalf of the United States, of safe passage from New Zealand to the United States and back. In the coming days we will be communicating with the appropriate authorities to make the necessary arrangements. In the meantime, I will make no further comment.

      STATEMENT FROM
      KIM DOTCOM

      Liked by 7 people

      • What solid evidence? He gave testimony without any tangible proof.

        Liked by 2 people

        • judyw says:

          He offers to provide solid evidence. This statement was about what he has to offer not to be construed as all he has to offer. Sorry if I could have worded that better.

          “I have consulted with my lawyers. I accept that my full statement should be provided to the authorities and I am prepared to do that so that there can be a full investigation. My lawyers will speak with the authorities regarding the proper process.

          If my evidence is required to be given in the United States I would be prepared to do so if appropriate arrangements are made.”

          Liked by 1 person

          • Like I said, he offered a promise. But within that promise, lacking agreement with the authorities, there is the option not to provide it. He bargained … instead of showing us a real email.

            Liked by 1 person

            • judyw says:

              Showing “us” a real email would be useless. He IMHO is putting a huge spotlight on Mueller that will show if he is biased or conducting a credible investigation. 🙂

              Liked by 2 people

              • WonkoTheSane says:

                Dotcom is a blowhard and a criminal. He made billions through copyright infringement. If he has what he says he has he can bring this whole thing to a screeching halt. If he is so supportive of wikileaks’ methods, then why ask for immunity to testify. Somebody needs to tell the effing truth already!!! My bet is it ain’t gonna be dotcom.

                Like

          • Daniel says:

            Whatever proof he has, it was collected OVER THE INTERNET. It can be delivered the SAME WAY. He’s a file sharing GIANT. He has the resources. That he wants to do it personally in the US with protection agreements? (And probably with intent to negotiate a lot more) What is he angling for if he just wants justice?

            Dotcom has his own agenda in this. Some time ago, this man who is a foreigner in a foreign country was RAIDED by US forces where they ransacked his home after landing on his property in black helicopters — he has it all on surveillance video. And took a lot of his stuff — stolen — armed robbery in truth.

            He has an axe to grind here and given the fact that he was completely silent when Seth Rich was murdered and only reveals any of this now?? Motivations other that justice seem to be the thing for him here.

            Liked by 2 people

            • judyw says:

              That he wants to do it personally in the US with protection agreements? doesn’t seem to sync with his statement: “If my evidence is required to be given in the United States” .

              Like

            • eagledriver50 says:

              Yes he can file share…AND I guarantee you that any public file share is being watched. Best thing for him is to have “dead man” switch. He gets to testify first, AND THEN THE DEAD MAN SWITCH IS ACTIVATED. Being doubly insured and Assange probably would have the key. This way both are protected. NO??? Kim is being ultra cautious besides talking with his attorneys, but attorneys can be bought and I am quite positive he did not tell them everything. Assange and KimDotCom are the lynch pins in this and it will stay this way. Assange is also keeping everyone guessing which makes whatever comes out even more believable. One can ONLY wire this a finite number of ways and everyone has just about covered everything. Spent way too much time chasing people in all kinds of environments and having “hard” evidence hand delivered is ALWAYS THE BEST WAY…

              Liked by 3 people

        • James F says:

          Kim is not a journalist like Assange.

          He can’t admit to possesing or handling documents that were obtained illegaly, especially of they are classified, without about being arrested and extradited.

          He needs to get immunity before he can proceed.

          Liked by 1 person

          • judyw says:

            I haven’t seen any reports of documents being obtained illegally…just that he communicated with Seth which could have been phone calls as well as electronic communications between the two of them.

            “I KNOW THAT SETH RICH WAS INVOLVED IN THE DNC LEAK.
            I know this because in late 2014 a person contacted me about helping me to start a branch of the Internet Party in the United States. He called himself Panda. I now know that Panda was Seth Rich.

            Panda advised me that he was working on voter analytics tools and other technologies that the Internet Party may find helpful.

            I communicated with Panda on a number of topics including corruption and the influence of corporate money in politics.

            “I have consulted with my lawyers. I accept that my full statement should be provided to the authorities and I am prepared to do that so that there can be a full investigation. My lawyers will speak with the authorities regarding the proper process.”

            Liked by 1 person

    • Dixie says:

      The NeverEnding story: When evil and “nothingness” invaded the earth.

      Like

      • judyw says:

        Seems this path we are witnessing today began in Arkansas. Hillary’s secret police tend to be a tight-lipped bunch, professionally skilled at keeping a low profile. However, we know more about Anthony “The Pelican” Pellicano than about most Hillary operatives, thanks to his boastfulness and taste for the limelight. Pellicano’s violent career as a private investigator reveals much about the sorts of qualifications Hillary sought in her Shadow Team.

        In 2008 Pellicano was sentenced to 15 years in prison after being convicted, reported the Washington Post, “of conspiring to run a criminal enterprise that employed illegal wiretaps to dig up dirt on the rich and famous on behalf of his elite Hollywood clients.”

        http://prorev.com/connex.htm

        Like

  11. rjcylon says:

    Look, I have sources that I can’t name. To do so would violate habeus corpus and the hippocratic oath. But there indeed have been questions. Concerns raised. Issues highlighted. Avenues explored and roads traveled. It may not be enough to convict at this time, but I implore you to at least use the words “Russia” and “impeachment” together in the same sentence over and over again throughout the next eight years until people can’t take it anymore and/or stop listening altogether. You ask me “what evidence do you have?” and I can just as easily respond with “what evidence do you NOT have?”. This is all about that specific evidence you are withholding from me. That’s all I can tell you for now.

    Liked by 11 people

    • Proud Texan says:

      Who are you replying to? You failed to make your point, regardless.

      Like

    • SonFlower says:

      Huh? Your comment sounds like a “word salad.” Agree with Proud Texan, you failed to make your point. What are you talking about and who are you responding to?

      Like

    • SonFlower says:

      Ok…you hear that noise? That was satire going right over my head…There’s so much fake news and babble speak lately I guess I missed it.

      Liked by 3 people

    • getouttahea says:

      I totally get your comment. Can I borrow that and spread it around the internet?

      Liked by 1 person

    • Taffie says:

      There are several articles about the research done on word association and Clinton’s loss of the election. The research shows that she lost because of the strong association of her name with the word email. Evidently, you saw those articles, and you have decided to use them against our president and the taxpayers who elected him. Perhaps you should try that tactic on a site that will oppose President Trump’s budget.

      Liked by 1 person

      • rjcylon says:

        I think you missed the point.

        Liked by 1 person

      • kjj says:

        I’m going to call BS on the “research” you are citing. Not that word association isn’t a thing, it is. The problem is that the Hillary voter turnout was pretty normal. She’s not Obama, she was never going to get his turnout.

        She lost because the Democrats, the media (but I repeat myself), and the GOPe failed to smear Trump enough to suppress his turnout.

        At first after the election, I thought it was time to dismiss the Monster Vote Hypothesis because Trump got 8-12 million fewer votes than that model had predicted. But the more I dig into the data, the more convinced I become that the Monster did appear, it just wasn’t obvious because the smear machine was unusually good this year, causing millions of squishy weak Republicans to skip – those losses offsetting much of the Monster gains.

        Liked by 1 person

        • ladypenquin says:

          I also believe that the 3 million “popular” votes that Hillary supposedly won over Trump are illegal or fraudulent votes. Democrats have been stealing elections for decades. It’s why they stopped the recount in Michigan once they hit Detroit…

          What’s scary is how close she came to winning. The Dems underestimated how much fraud they needed in their own blue states. Be careful, they won’t let that happen again.

          Liked by 4 people

          • Fe says:

            I have faith that PDJT will clean up the Voter fraud.

            Liked by 2 people

            • ladypenquin says:

              That’s always in the back of my mind, Fe; hope and prayer, because the Dems have it down to a science. The reason why Donald Trump won was because he made sure his message reached all the people, not just GOP voter blocks. In the meantime, Congress keeps trying to stop his agenda.

              I also hope that Jeff Sessions has indictments up his sleeve that may make some of the Congress critters go home.

              Liked by 2 people

    • OP says:

      Lol….perfect circular logic…

      Like

  12. Rosech says:

    Remember how we a little group of kids did something wrong or bad? When we all ran away and later blamed someone else. Well, Brennan is doing that but then that is the democrat way to try and cover up their mistakes and bad acts. Yep, the former and current fill in (maybe like 3 in total) need to be arrested and in prison and then off to the rope necklaces we have ready and waiting! Hopefully, when Trump chooses the new FBI it won’t be a democrat but perhaps someone with NO connection to any intelligence agency but with experience in management and truth and morals and no connection to the Clintons as most of the FBI and even CIA have and/or had. Not one of them is innocent but protecting their behinds by turning against someone else who looks the most viable and that is Comey. Comey’s history as well as McCabe have had ties with the Clintons for a long time. Now we need someone with no political connections. More swamp to drain but will happen!

    Liked by 4 people

  13. albrevin says:

    Why would Schiff facilitate Brennan’s throwing Comey under the bus?

    Like

  14. Chris Geddes says:

    I will keep on saying these things as long as I live ; do not put your trust in any man for anything . God knows that I respect and I admire Pres. Trump , but we are up against dark spiritual forces of wickedness that influence human activity . The battle is in the spiritual realm , and the victories are realized in the temporal realm . This is not science fiction , this is Biblical truth . Victorious spiritual warfare wins out . We have light and truth , while they have lies and darkness .

    Liked by 12 people

    • Susan in VA says:

      I as a Bible-believing Christian I wholeheartedly agree with every word you’ve written. ‘For we wrestle not against flesh and blood but spiritual wickedness in high places therefore but on the whole armour of God.’

      Liked by 8 people

    • I agree. If it comes down to putting your family in harms way, most people back off. An individual may be brave enough to sacrifice their own life to get the truth out, but if it someone else who loses their life because of it, it is a different game. The dark forces will stop at nothing to protect themselves.

      Liked by 4 people

  15. Wouldn’t it be great to watch them start turning on each other like the snakes they are?

    Liked by 16 people

  16. fleporeblog says:

    James Comey thought he would forever be protected by doing his job in their coverup. They had him by the balls given his statements about HRC in July. In order to be forgiven by HRC once she was elected, he had to hide his investigation from the Gand of Eight. This allowed Brennan and Clapper to present their BS to the Gang of Eight from August through September and to allow their BS report to Barry from Hawaii before leaving the WH.

    James thought he was good to go when he announced at the March 20th hearing that their was an open investigation into the Muh Russia interference. No way would our President fire him with an open investigation involving his campaign staff and possibly him. Our Lion said you are a POS and you are fired! That day is when these rats realized that sh…t just got real. The dam was broken never to be able to be put back together again.

    Comey will never testify to congress again! The next time we will see Comey will be on the witness stand. If he is able to get immunity to testify on all of Barry’s minions or he will be testifying in his trial. James do yourself a favor and ask our President to allow you into the witness protection program because your life is literally at stake! Choose wisely you POS!

    Liked by 17 people

    • William Ford says:

      What makes anyone think that Meuller is any less crooked than Comey?

      Liked by 7 people

      • H.R. says:

        William Ford: “What makes anyone think that Meuller is any less crooked than Comey?”

        From my perspective, it’s unknown. However, we’ll have to see if Mueller starts kicking ass and taking names. He should be getting the info, or lack thereof, he needs in the next week or so.

        I don’t think we’ll have to wait too long to get the answer to your question.

        Liked by 4 people

    • Southern Son says:

      How can Comey be meeting with Mueller?
      This Stinks to high heaven!
      And No Witness Protection Plan for Comey, except a Prison Cell.

      Liked by 2 people

      • fleporeblog says:

        Ishtar be so that he can sing like a bird if given immunity!

        Liked by 5 people

      • deqwik2 says:

        Comey was going to talk publicly at the hearing today, (Wed), but cancelled.
        On Tues. a CNN article says Mueller has been to the FBI to investigate Comey memos. The article says that Mueller doesn’t want Comey to speak until he, Mueller, has a chance to talk to him.

        Liked by 4 people

        • mariner says:

          Mueller and Comey need to get their stories straight before either one of them says something that might later hang one of them.

          Mueller’s job isn’t to investigate, it’s to steer the investigation the way the UniParty wants it to go. I can’t fathom why Rosenstein hired him, unless of course Rosenstein’s a fellow Swamp Creature..

          Liked by 3 people

          • WSB says:

            How does this tie into Trump Admin members ysibg Mueller’s firm as their attorney?

            Like

          • Bill Wright says:

            BINGO!

            Rosenstein convinced Sessions to recuse himself on the basis that he would handle it. He handled it all right.

            I have seen this many times before. Politicians appoint people who were not on their team during the campaign, and they almost always come to regret it.

            The truth is you don’t need vast experience to do most government jobs. Not a single congressman or senator had any experience in their job before they were elected. Rand Paul was an eye doctor. Barry O had no experience running anything before he was president. You learn when you get there.

            The newly elected panic and feel they must appoint “experienced” people. These people are swamp rats. Once they are in place, it makes it very difficult to effect change.

            Rosenstein = Bush Family swamp rat

            Following Rosenstein’s appointment of a special counsel Jeb did his “I told you so.” What a coincidence.

            Like

      • not2worryluv says:

        Another Clinton/Lynch moment-precedence set for Obama minions.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Rip Tide says:

      Very well-stated flep, love your posts man!!

      Liked by 2 people

    • eagledriver50 says:

      AND Now you know why he is talking with his pal, Mueller…WITNESS PROTECTION!!! And ONLY the Attorney General can give that…or APPROVE IT!!!

      Liked by 1 person

    • MaineCoon says:

      fleporeblog,

      I always absolutely love your summaries! Spot and and always a spicy! Plus, it adds more dots that I sometimes connect!

      Thanks for the full synopsis as I have only been glued to P45’s trip this week.

      Comey is dead meat. His brother is on a slippery slope too.

      Consequences of THEIR bad choices.

      So be it. What comes, comes.

      Liked by 1 person

  17. bulwarker says:

    I loath this congressional theater and the actors in it. Isnt Holder STILL in contempt?

    Liked by 10 people

  18. William Ford says:

    Except not one Republican in any of these hearings has raised the issue put forth by Sundance. Either they don’t get it…or they don’t want to get it. I think half of them support the Dem initiated coup.

    Liked by 15 people

  19. Dan says:

    Love your analysis Sundace. And I believe you are right. Brennan gave Comey the investigative product which probably had nothing to do with the Trump team and Comey used it to carry out Obama, Hillary, Susan Rice’s dirty work for them. Ofcourse Brennan was in on the whole thing and is now saving his own skin by saying ” I briefed ya’ll on everything I had with regards to Russia, anything additional that arose please talk to my buddy Comey”. If there is any true Justice, Comey might be doing a perp walk soon. The way they waited till he was out of town to fire him and then locked down his office, its no surprise even Brennan is distancing himself. Infact I think Comey might be having a lot of sleepless nights now. But then again Hillary is still a free person so maybe he will go free too.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Contrarymary says:

      But then again, chaffetz gave comey the okay not to testify until he colluded (er, met) with mueller, with whom he is said to be best buds. Remember everybody in Washington was saying comey what a stand-up, straight arrow, honest, incorruptible guy until he wasn’t. Now their saying the same thing about meuller. Don’t think I trust this. What does he have to say to meuller and why is he allowed to “consult” with him, when comey is part of the investigations?

      Liked by 7 people

  20. Sandra-VA says:

    I thought the most interesting part came right at the end where he interrupted closing to suddenly recall that he actually was in his office on Jan 20th….. and also the part when Gowdy asked him about whether he knew of any ambassadors asking for unmasking.

    I think Gowdy has this whole thing dead to rights and now he is just working to trip them all up. He knows the truth of everything. Guarantee it… now he is playing out the rope.

    Liked by 2 people

    • libertysc2016 says:

      I would like to agree with you, but Gowdy never delivers. He offers smoke but never brings anything to a meaningful conclusion. In this case, I hope you are correct.

      Liked by 17 people

    • OnlyInAmerica says:

      You can see it in Gowdy’s face…he knows!

      Liked by 3 people

    • Kathy says:

      My brain started itching about those same questions. By mentioning the leaking of a citizen’s name to a major U.S. newspaper, Trey Gowdy was clearly referring to the unmasking of Mike Flynn.

      So did Trey Gowdy simply want to observe how John Brennan would react to “speculation”? Or was Trey Gowdy telling John Brennan the committee aleady had “evidence” of the crime before he went into the closed-door meeting?

      Liked by 3 people

    • distracted2 says:

      No doubt that Gowdy knows. Unrelenting doubt he’ll do anything about it.

      Liked by 2 people

    • The Demon Slick says:

      I wish he would ask if they also investigated all of the contacts the Hillary Clinton campaign had with the Russians. After all, if a campaign talking to Russian officials is enough to trigger an investigation, it would only make sense, right? Unless of course the whole thing is made up partisan Nonsense and only contact between Trump and Russia is suspicious, while contact between the Clinton campaign and the Russians is totally fine.

      Liked by 1 person

  21. Ted says:

    1) Mueller is the cleaner. His job is to make this all go away.

    2) I don’t see how Hanity can survive at Fox. The guard has changed and he has no place.

    Liked by 6 people

    • judyw says:

      Tonight reminds me of the time Hannity was on the road in 2008 and planning a huge special about Obama that never happened. We know that “choke collar” look all too well. One door closes and a better one always, always opens and he will know when he’s had enough “control”. 🙂

      Liked by 4 people

      • LKA in LA says:

        Hannity is going to be let go from Fox news. He should go out in a blaze of glory and just say what he has to say regarding Seth Rich. Go out noble. Country first. Do it for Seth!

        Liked by 3 people

    • ECM says:

      This is literally it: “muh Rusia” is dead–Mueller is just there to make sure those in power never pay for their malfeasance.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Rick says:

      The Murdoch boys don’t want strong conservative positions presented to the base. Hannity is as good as gone. FOX has already lost its ratings and will make its final fall into oblivion after Hannity leaves. Tucker started strong, can’t even knock off MSNBC or CNN counters in the ratings war. FOX is DEAD!

      A new media outlet needs to be started!

      Liked by 2 people

    • distracted2 says:

      Fox’s ratings are in the toilet for the first time since…well, forever. If Hannity goes, there’s an opening for a new conservative network to emerge. Personally, I would welcome it.

      Like

    • Joe S says:

      EXACTLY!

      This thing has shined light on too many things that could spin out of control and take out the whole corporation. No one can prosecute these NON-CRIMES because the discovery would bring out everything into the open that NO ONE wants out in the open.

      Mueller’s job is to bring some neutral resolution to this. That is why the D’s are saying there is no there there now-they are telegraphing it is over.

      Mueller is the fixer in this operation. They have used Jamie Gorelick too many times, so now it falls to Mueller.

      It is all about protecting the corporation now.

      Like

  22. To those treepers wrapped up in the Seth Rich – hitman scenario …

    … take a deep breath.

    Think back to the Jessica Chambers case and the treeper groupthink that went off the deep end.

    Think back to the groupthink that was positive that Jessica had turned her life around and gone Christian. Think back to the groupthink that was sure that the Rudd family were the culprits. Recall the groupthink that was determined to show that the police chief and the prosecutor were in on a fix, maybe dealing drugs, blah blah blah blah blah.

    No, Jessica had not turned her life around. She was still hanging out with losers. And, like I eventually came to believe, went VOLUNTARILY to her death scene to meet the person that eventually murdered her.

    It took the authorities, using painstaking technological means (cell phone data, mainly) to track here real killer. Now, I will wait to see the evidence of his guilt. It hasn’t been presented yet. But should it be, it will be a reminder that Seth Rich’s final hour and movements (and that of his murderer) might be reconstituted by deputies and technicians slogging through the process. No guarantees, but don’t count it out.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Albertus Magnus says:

      Excellent post!

      Like

      • It was not meant to bash. Sundance’s motives to honor Jessica were pure. The lady who constructed the memorial for herwas as noble as a human can be. Nobody deserved to die like that.

        But evidence is evidence. Patience is required, and I think that Rich’s family asking the DC authorities to open the vault is the wisest path possible.

        Liked by 1 person

        • deqwik2 says:

          I concluded from Hannity’s remarks tonight that Seth’s parents just don’t want their son’s death caught up in all the “tin-foil hat” stuff.
          I do believe they want an investigation & will take any info that is creditable but they want it respectfully done. If the tin foil hat stuff shakes out something good, then I’m sure they would appreciate it. They just don’t want Seth’s memory to be associated with Kim.com & wikileaks with no hard facts.
          I don’t blame them.

          Liked by 2 people

    • dayallaxeded says:

      not remotely similar circumstances nor do i recall the theory that JLC was targeted bc she was trying to escape the black gang life being debunked. I’m for letting solid investigations go forward and let chips fall, but it serves no useful purpose to conflate 2 completely different cases to try to quell discussion. Truth has no agenda, unlike hiding the truth, which almost always has an agenda or 3.

      Liked by 2 people

  23. saintoil says:

    Go all the way as in BS. Or put some perps in jail?

    Like

  24. Southpaw says:

    Well damn! Brennan said no obstruction and no collusion so no crimes or impeachment. I got it this one time at a rally he said something mean and hurt somebody’s feelings and this judge in Hawaii said that’s bullying and so you’re in trouble. Now can we get rid of that Obama Care 💩

    Liked by 2 people

  25. Watcher says:

    Zero and crew setting comey up to take the fall.
    Comey is a Clinton stooge, he goes down than the Clintons go down.
    Zero and crew escape and zero becomes undisputed democrat party leader.
    “It’s a dirty business folks”.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. jeans2nd says:

    Beg pardon, but this throws more than Comey under the bus.

    Brennan – “through the so-called Gang-of-Eight process we kept congress apprised of these issues as we identified them.”

    ” I PERSONALLY briefed the full details of our understanding of Russian attempts to interfere in the election to congressional leadership; specifically (names Gof8 members)…
    between 11th August and 6th September [2016], I provided the same briefing to each of the gang of eight members.”

    “the full details of what we knew at the time were shared only with those members of congress; each of whom was accompanied by one senior staff member.”…”

    See Benghazi Brief. The Uniparty strikes again.
    They knew. They all knew, They all knew the entire time. Weasels.

    Liked by 11 people

  27. Albertus Magnus says:

    This will piss people off, but whatever.

    1) I think Seth Rich is the leaker.
    2) I think that Rich was not murdered by any public person, although there is more evidence for that than for the muh Russia story the media runs to death.
    3) Hannity and I have the exact same heart. But maybe now that he has had to shut up to save his job, maybe he will understand why some politicians wont speak up enough to suit him and others who don’t have their jobs on the line. I am not defending weasels from the GOPe. I am saying that they know who elected them and it wasn’t the Tea Party that elected Ryan, it was the CoC and the globalists. He is no more going to defend Trump than Sean is going to go against the Murdocks.

    Just saying.

    Like

    • ALEX says:

      I don’t look at it like shutting up…There are no new facts…Wheeler said he has seen no emails and doesn’t know where the Rich laptop is…It’s best to back-off for now…

      If we don’t like the Fake Russia collusion garbage without facts, then let’s not dive into this without facts,,,Innuendo cuts both ways…Unless of course people have facts…

      Liked by 2 people

      • Albertus Magnus says:

        We are saying the same thing, I think. What just pisses me off though is when people in the media get so self-righteous about politicians not speaking out more along the lines they want them to and calling them sellouts when they don’t. How many times did people call our PDJT as selling out on the wall, on Planned Parenthood, on draining the swamp, etc.? He wasn’t a sell out and didn’t deserve to be treated as such. Hope Sean has more empathy and sticks to the issues a little more in the future, including discussing the situations from a dispassionate POV even when everyone around him wants to just spew vitrol.

        Liked by 1 person

  28. Joan says:

    Sounds like Brennan is now trying to save himself.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. StuckIntheMiddle says:

    So am I right in thinking that Comey has two options: 1) refute what Brennan just said about denying that Trump attempted to influence the Flynn investigation, and instead say it happened. Which would of course conflict with his previous statement under oath that there has never been any influence on the IC to influence an investigation 2) suffer memory loss?

    Like

    • Comey – “What difference at this point does it make”. or it can be “I may have lied but there was no intent, except that does not mean anybody else trying to conspire against the President would not be charged in future, but I also do not see any prosecutor prosecuting me and therefore recommend that I should not be charged.”

      Liked by 8 people

      • Political Reviewer says:

        Sounds about right. And the crazy thing is that if Comey said this, the weasels in Congress would agree with him. They’d probably stand up and applaud.

        Liked by 3 people

  30. bofh says:

    I would think that the various “oversight” committees probably prefer NOT to know too much about what is going on, in order to maintain at least some degree of plausible deniability (at least in their own minds). And I think the IC is probably usually happy to not tell them about some of the sketchy things that they’re doing.

    As long as no one looks closely, everyone’s happy. And the MSM is, for sure, not going to “look closely”, so it’s all good. Until now. Now it has the potential to turn into a remake of the Titanic – life-vests are first-come first-serve, the water is cold, and there won’t be enough room in the lifeboats.

    Liked by 6 people

    • libertysc2016 says:

      The gang of eight was in the loop and probably knew all the sordid details. Ryan and McConnell knew about the surveillance and unmasking of all things Trump. If you assume this to be true, it make Ryan’s behavior last year and early this year make more sense. They should both be encouraged to resign.

      Liked by 6 people

  31. mopar2016 says:

    Brennan admits that he visited Mecca when he was stationed in Saudi Arabia.
    I think that “taqiyya” is definitely in play here.

    Like

  32. Alison says:

    Call me not the sharpest spoon in the drawer, but every time I hear them say ‘Russia (tried to) interfered with our election, my question is HOW??

    What did Russia do? What was the interference?

    Did I miss that already being asked & answered?? I just want someone to explain HOW Russia interfered.

    Liked by 5 people

    • suncc49 says:

      They wrote a huge report on it basically saying that because Russia Today news network reported negatively on CLinton it influenced the election. They also like the Reddit crowd to Russian trollbots, but we all know they are real people, lol.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Windy Day says:

        Ha! If Russia Today is guilty of that, then so is every U.S. media outlet (except for one or two). But whatever!

        My question is this: What does Russia Today have to do with Trump?

        Liked by 1 person

        • MaineCoon says:

          If RT interfered on Trump behalf, every single MSM (CNN, ABC, MSNBC, NPR, etc, ) interfered on Clinton’s behalf as did the censorship on FB, Twitter.

          Liked by 1 person

    • They didn’t. I and every dedicated treeper interfered with Hillary’s coronation than they did.

      And I am proud that I did …. smirk.

      Liked by 10 people

      • Joe says:

        And basically anyone who read and commented on the Wikileaks stuff was a Russian Twitter bot-LOL.

        Call me comrade @realjoes from now on!

        Liked by 3 people

        • Bull Durham says:

          Comrade Bull Durham, undercover KGBinski reporting.

          The loony Left went after anyone who commented on “wouldn’t it be a good thing if we could get along with Russia.” We were all named as trolls for Putin, on Putin’s payroll, a Kremlin stooge.

          We saw with Vault 7 that the Internet was the CIA playground, that they and the other allies’ nation-state Intel Services were all placing “Russian” fingerprints everywhere, to be found and denounced.

          This was Podesta’s plan and the Deep State has done it. It began in 2015 and was full blown by 2016. Now it is on meth, souped up and speeding to a bad ending.

          Liked by 2 people

    • RedBallExpress says:

      I think the Russians paid Hillary supporters to incite violence at Trump rallies thereby making Trump look good on the MSM. My theory needs work but you had a good question, Alison.

      Like

    • Windy Day says:

      Yup, that’s the very question I’ve been asking from the get-go! HOW exactly do “they” claim that Russia interfered?

      It is completely impossible for Russia to have tampered with so many different voting machines and methods in a large number of states to rig it so that Trump won. That’s not even possible!

      And, by the way, I haven’t seen a plausible explanation yet! I suppose that’s the sticking point for the Uniparty and media, too, but, hey, let’s just ignore that and keep shouting “Russia! Russia! Russia!”

      Liked by 1 person

  33. ALEX says:

    This all starts with Carter Page…He was investigated in 2012 or 2014 for some work in Russia and was cleared…President Trump put him on as advisor to have a name associated with Russia and they never met each other…

    Page has said his office is nearby and he teaches college in NYC…He has mentioned he had lunch many days when he was an advisor in the Trump Tower Grill…

    That was the way in for CIA and others…Page is not a Russian spy and if you listen to Brennan’s words he is describing Carter Page…Brennan then turned it over to FBI at same time Comey was taking incredible flack for Clinton email decision…

    I think this entire thing became Comey’s way of redeeming himself by investigating and eventually tormenting President Trump whom he despises..Comey is an egotistical showboat.

    The unmasking is what they are all worried about BIGLY…They didn’t think President Trump would go there..That’s what will put people in prison and with the leaks continuing it’s a top priority now..

    Liked by 8 people

  34. Mike diamond says:

    When Obama made a bad Iran deal where where was brennan?????when bill Clinton meets with Loretta lynch on her plane where was Brennans concern?????now he says Russia this and Russia that ! What a scam!

    Liked by 6 people

  35. hellinahandbasket says:

    Has DHS’s Secretary [General] John Kelly retained possession of passports for:
    B.Obama
    HR.Clinton
    WJ.Clinton
    J.Podesta
    T.Podesta
    H.Abedin
    S.Rice
    L.Lynch
    J.Comey
    and to be sure:
    J.Clapper
    J.Brennan
    …OR have DHS Travel-Alerts placed at all US Airports?
    If not, he better get right to it.

    Liked by 6 people

  36. deplorabledaveinsocal says:

    That bus seems like it is going to run over a lot of people before all this is over…

    Liked by 4 people

  37. Laura Wesselmann says:

    Subpoena the gang of eight. Anybody takes the fifth it’s re-call time. Or a water-boarding extravaganza.

    Liked by 4 people

  38. andi lee says:

    @56:00
    LoBiondo:
    |pp| Do you believe other countries were involved into influencing our elections?

    Clapper:
    [Pauses; Squirms in seat; Rolls head; hands figiting]
    |pp| I’ll have to think about that; discuss it with you in closed session.

    @60:15
    Rep Rooney:
    Ref: MSM leaking by, as many as 20 IC leakers; Clinton, Clinton, Clinton.

    Liked by 1 person

  39. xyzlatin says:

    1. Eight members of gang of 8, plus 8 unknown staffers, 16 in all, had the same report delivered to them by 6th September 2016 as was delivered in January 2017 and not one mentioned it was the same?
    2. Of those 16 people, not one raised the query of “where are the two quarterly FBI report on this very important matter between Sept and the election date? Or before the inauguration? So either they did not think it was that important, or they were complicit with the FBI in allowing the FBI free reign to smear Trump. Paul Ryan one of those 16.
    3. Brennan’s says the investigation was instigated by press reports. So not their own “wiretapping”. So where did those press reports come from? Is it reasonable to assume the original press reports were put there by Hillary Clinton supporters?
    4. Brennan looks very very nervous. Trying to blow a lot of smoke when asked by Gowdy when he got first evidence or even whether there was any evidence. Deflects on to generalities of how they operate. Avoids even saying whether it was Trump, Trump officials, or hangers on.
    5. Obama was fully informed from the beginning.

    Liked by 9 people

    • carterzest says:

      Boom! You’re paying attention.

      Like

    • G. Combs says:

      “4. Brennan looks very very nervous. Trying to blow a lot of smoke when asked by Gowdy when he got first evidence or even whether there was any evidence. Deflects on to generalities of how they operate. Avoids even saying whether it was Trump, Trump officials, or hangers on. “

      This is Brennan silently admitting it was an UNLAWFUL fishing expedition to see if they could dig up dirt to smear Trump with before the election.

      Liked by 1 person

      • benzy says:

        Which begs the REAL question… just who (and which groups) was really trying to “influence our election”? Sounds like Brennan, the FBI and the CIA aren’t really sure (in a legal sense of sure… you know, EVIDENCE) that the Russians influenced our election… but it darn well seems that the “press reports”, CIA and FBI DID try to influence the election.

        Liked by 1 person

  40. The members of congress and MSM are traitors jeopardizing our national security. Although it may have been an open secret that Ambassadors are surveilled, it was never out in the open. For months the MSM are going about with Flynn’s name was unmasked as a result of surveillance on Russian ambassador and that Russia interfered in our election, to counter that the alternative media goes about with United States interfered with elections in 85 countries, and so on? How is this helpful to anybody? In this information age this does not help at all since smart cookies (e.g. 4chan figuring out the location of the flag with seemingly no data available to ordinary persons) will figure out how it was done and can take steps to counter that or in next election cycle indeed do some great harm, and I am sure whomever came up with the plan to surveil the Russian ambassador must have had to do quite a bit of technical wizadry to overcome or break through Russians communications encryption.

    Liked by 1 person

  41. trumpfan1 says:

    YOU PEOPLE COMPLAIN AND COMPLAIN.

    BUT NOT ONE EVER STAND UP FOR THE TRUTH.
    NO ONE EVER SUPPORT THE PRESIDENT.
    NO ONE EVER ORGANIZE TOWN HALL DISRUPTION.
    NO ONE EVER THREATEN THE DEMONCRATS
    NO ONE EVER DO ANY INVESTIGATION
    NO ONE EVER ORGANIZE MARCH EVERY WEEK
    NO ONE EVER ORGANIZE PROTEST EVERY WEEK
    NO ONE EVER CALL FOR IMPEACHMENT OF THE JUDGE/MAXINE WATER/PELOSI NONSENSE.
    NO ONE EVER PROTECT THE MONUMENT
    NO ONE EVER SUPPORT THE TRAVEL BAN
    NO ONE EVER SUPPORT THE SANCTUARY CITY BAN
    NO ONE EVER GO AFTER THE MSM

    NO ONE. SO HOW DO YOU CHANGE THE COUNTRY. HOW???
    AMERICA IS GONE WITH ONLY TRUMP AND HIS SMALL GROUP OF WHITE HOUSE STAFF.

    YOU NEED TO BE LIKE THE ANTIFA AND DEMONCRATS. UNITE AND TURN THEM DOWN!

    Like

    • nimrodman says:

      NO ONE EVER TAKE CAPS LOCK … off

      Liked by 5 people

    • xyzlatin says:

      I totally agree. But all Trump really needs is enough votes to win the presidency, and enough votes from lawmakers. From all accounts he hasn’t lost any voters and has in fact, firmed up and gained some.

      Liked by 3 people

    • G. Combs says:

      Dude, It is done one on one with FACTS! What you are suggesting just plays into the hands of the Globalist who are just ITCHING to call us DANGEROUS

      I have been doing it for years. I hand out business cards and print on the back websites to visit for real info. You can also use 3X5 index cards.

      I start with the Fed Reserve and 1913 plus Congressman Mc Fadden and his remarks about Russia. (Give them Congress McFadden – Russia to search)

      Then “Congressman Calloway’s Congressional record of 1917” to search.
      (U.S. Congressional Record February 9, 1917, page 2947 — Congressman Calloway announced that the J.P. Morgan interests bought 25 of America’s leading newspapers, and inserted their own editors, in order to control the media.) BTW the last I checked J.P. Morgan interests are STILL in control of much of the MSM link

      Last “The Network of Global Corporate Control”
      The financial interests (Banksters) are also in control of the Transnational Corporations – PAPER: The Network of Global Corporate Control and that is just the start of a whole bunch of articles about that paper.

      ALL of this is neutral. It is neither Democrat nor Republican and it starts people thinking and looking behind the curtain.

      If they are really interested I throw in.
      THE POST SUSTAINABLE FUTURE by Rosa Koire a Democrat.

      Like

    • deanbrh says:

      YES! YES!! YES! Michael Moore runs their show, has a daily agenda, which is why ALL media on the same rant every day, a DIFFERENT rant every day. But the fact is, Republicans are the Worker Bees, earning the money that goes in the tax bins and pays all these a$$hat politicians to skewer our President. Republicans work 80-hour weeks. And are civilized!

      Like

  42. Joe says:

    I guess that Brennen was just following Clapper’s lead from last week when he said that evidence against Trump may exist, but he was just not privy to it.

    It all makes sense now. Everyone thought Clapper was trying to support the investigation, but he was extricating himself from it.

    Like

  43. xyzlatin says:

    Well I looked up to the 55 minute mark which is enough for me to assess Brennan. He is a BS artist who is very worried about his own skin. He will not be pinned down on any specifics, but deflects constantly on to generalities, and is making every effort to demonize the Russians. That this dissembling fellow got to the position he had is a testament to how much USA has fallen.

    Liked by 3 people

  44. The unmasking is the scandal.

    The wholesale unmasking is the scandal.

    Repeat and repeat again.

    Liked by 4 people

  45. JohnPaulJohnes says:

    Obama gave them E.O. 12333 and they still can’t their stories straight.

    Liked by 2 people

  46. Mike diamond says:

    Its amazing where was clapper and Brennan during Benghazi,during very bad deal Obama made with Iran,where were they ???? Where was their concern?? Hillary’s pay for play??Hillary bleach bits her computer!where were these guys!????please help me understand this!Obama slams the door on Israel,john Kerry does the same! Who are these guys where have they been????yet they seemed so concerned about Russia???this is the twilight zone! Rod sterling would not believe this! This may be one of the biggest scams in american history!!!!

    Liked by 4 people

  47. Troublemaker says:

    Maybe Hannity put the Seth Rich story on hold to allow things to play out further.
    ———

    SOMEONE IS LYING TO SETH RICH’S FAMILY ABOUT KIM DOTCOM
    MAY 23, 2017 CONTRASPIN

    https://contraspin.co.nz/someone-is-lying-to-seth-richs-family-about-kim-dotcom/

    Excerpt:

    But Why Didn’t Kim Dotcom Answer The Rich Family Email?

    Remember – in the Rich’s letter to Hannity they stated:

    “Earlier this week, I was approached by someone claiming to be Kim Dotcom via email. In my reply to this person who claimed to be Mr. Dotcom, we asked to have a discussion with him about the evidence, either in person or through legal intermediaries in order to collect the evidence and verify it with law enforcement before he publicly goes on TV making claims that haven’t been substantiated. There has been no response to that email.”

    I wanted to know why Kim didn’t answer them. So I asked him.

    His exact and total response to me:

    “They replied to a message I sent to them two days ago. They asked for my lawyers to get in touch with their lawyers. I have forwarded the email to my lawyers and asked them to get in touch with the family to arrange for a conference call with the Rich family lawyers.” — Kim Dotcom

    Liked by 6 people

    • Ron says:

      I think you’re onto something. I was just going to post this as it’s own topic, but you hit the nail on the head.

      What if Hannity backed off, because someone like Jeff Sessions called him and said “Calm down. Don’t talk. Wait a wihle. “

      Liked by 1 person

  48. scott467 says:

    Sundance: “Brennan is throwing Comey under the bus and attempting to create plausible deniability for his role in a constructing a political narrative; a false narrative.”

    —————————

    To what end, though?

    Why even go through the paces, when we know the corrupt ‘gang of 8’ is in on the whole thing, and we know that no Congressional ‘investigation’ for at least the last 8 years has ever gone anywhere, specifically because the whole thing is a ruse?

    Why go to the trouble of throwing Comey under the bus or create plausible deniability for himself? That would only matter in a world where accountability existed, and we don’t live in that world now.

    It would only matter in a world where there was a legitimate ‘loyal opposition’ Party and a true adversarial system, but we don’t live in that world anymore either, we have a UniParty whose entire purpose is to protect itself.

    So this entire construct is a ‘relic’ of a bygone era where things like ‘accountability’ and ‘plausible deniability’ mattered. They don’t now. Nobody is going to be held accountable for anything. Brennan could stand up on the table and start twerking while he confessed to the entire bogus Russia conspiracy narrative, and not one thing would happen to him or anyone else involved, because the object of the ‘investigation’ is not (and has never been) to get to any ‘truth’ or to hold anyone accountable.

    If it turned out that they HAD to hold someone accountable and actually DO something about misconduct, they would have no more idea how to do that than they know how to write bills to be passed into law, because they haven’t done that for 15+ years either.

    So what is the point of the entire exercise?

    .

    Liked by 5 people

  49. KBR says:

    When I read this the first time, I understood it to mean “Russian attempts to interfere in the election to congressional leadership.”

    Meaning Russian attempts to interfere with elections

    OF CONGRESSMEN,
    or
    Russian attempts to interfere with the inside-the-legislature-elections of each of the gang of 8 onto the “leadership positions” they now enjoy?

    Knowing that Brennan (et al) are skilled at doublespeak, could this be what he actually said?

    If so, it could explain “unmasking” or “wire tapping” (for want of a clearer term) of Nunes, of Rand Paul.

    Since “each” GO8 member was informed, apparently separately rather than as a group, it would be interesting to see what each GO8 member’s Russian connections are.

    It sounds like each was threatened to me, or at least each Republican.

    ” I PERSONALLY briefed the full details of our understanding of

    Russian attempts to interfere in the election to congressional leadership;

    specifically (names Gof8 members)…

    between 11th August and 6th September [2016],

    I provided the same briefing TO EACH of the gang of eight members.”

    “the full details of what we knew at the time were shared only with those members of congress;

    EACH of whom was accompanied by one senior staff member.”…”

    And, the “one senior staff member…” was that a senior staff member of the IC, or of the individual GO8 member?

    Ah the doublespeak…Maybe I just need more coffee…

    Liked by 1 person

  50. itsy_bitsy says:

    Top Justice, FBI and CIA were so corrupted under Obama that they acted more as an arm of a dictator to force down competition from Obama’s and the democrat’s declared enemies, Republicans and at the top of the list Conservatives. So if you thought, that for 8 years, we were still under the kind of protection we experienced under Reagan and the Bushes, then think again. We know Brennan, like Obama was a communist sympathizer who for the first 4 years of his term kissed Putin’s rear! It was only when Obama decided Putin was not as close a friend as he thought, that he started this Russia collusion stuff. When the Republicans won the democrats were left with nothing but phony plot themes to push against them. This they have done with the help of their propaganda group the US Press Corp. Trump needs to really clean house and sweep these traitors out of Washington DC but especially out of our top law enforcement and security departments. Corruption cannot be allowed to rule in Washington!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s