SCOTUS Nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch – Senate Confirmation Hearing Day #1 – Live Stream Added

Supreme Court Nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch will begin the Senate confirmation process today as the judiciary committee begins hearing testimony in support and opposition.

The hearings will Live Stream on CSPAN and also AVAILABLE HERE.  Additional Live Stream #1  – Additional Live Stream #2


Date: Monday, March 20, 2017
Time: 11:00 AM EST
Location: Hart Senate Office Building 216
Presiding: Chairman Senator Chuck Grassley

This entry was posted in media bias, President Trump, Supreme Court, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

133 Responses to SCOTUS Nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch – Senate Confirmation Hearing Day #1 – Live Stream Added

  1. Judicial Committee Chairman Grassley is targeting April 3rd as the date for the committee to vote and send him to Senate for confirmation.

    Liked by 9 people

  2. LibertyVibe says:

    It is quite possible that MSM will be so busy trying to deal with the blows coming their way from the new surveillance info coming out today, that they might actually ignore Gorsuch, and allow him to squeak through.

    Liked by 4 people

    • LibertyVibe says:

      In case you haven’t heard, Jerome Corsi put the evidence into POTUS hands last week, and broke the info last night. They have been spying on Trump for 10 years, his whole family, all of his properties, and the people he comes in contact with.

      Liked by 12 people

      • fred2w says:

        I had a feeling President Trump was holding back the evidence until the right time.

        If we thought Maddow’s epic fail was fun, this week should be even more fun.

        Liked by 6 people

      • Daniel says:

        Sorry, but I still don’t hold too much faith in InfoWars. There have been some things they have had right, but when they did, it was always when other people had it just before or after they did. But in this case, no other source is touching this and the proof doesn’t seem to materialize and neither does a lot of things they cover.

        Also, I can’t stand going to their site — there is now a Topless Alex Jones on the front page… no thank you.

        Liked by 5 people

        • LibertyVibe says:

          It was actually Jerome Corsi from WND, Sheriff Joe, and a bunch of other people that combined the whistleblower info. Infowars allowed them to come on their show, but it wasn’t their research.

          Liked by 7 people

          • wolfmoon1776 says:

            I think It helps to read Klayman’s history of the chain of evidence. Where it came from, what it is, who stole it, why they stole it, and how they were stiff-armed for years by all these politicos and judges, whose jaws would invariably drop, getting us to this point. I tend to believe that this evidence or rumors of its existence were central to the entire Trump candidacy.


            Liked by 5 people

            • maiingankwe says:

              This angers me to no end. These politicians have known about this illegal wiretapping for years, and yet they stand in front of cameras and say it simply isn’t so to the American people.

              Only a few good journalists will put a light on this, but unfortunately it will be a he said, she said argument. The left will believe the lies and stomp their feet we are making all of this up. Nothing will ever be done, not the way it should be done anyways.

              I am so sick of these lying politicians and the alphabet soup. They’re too busy covering everything up and claiming everything is peachy keen even though they know the public is learning the facts. As long as it is only a small group of us fighting for the truth, they will win. At one time I had thought that if the Drudge reported it, we’d be good, but even now they too are being ignored.

              When is this going to stop? When can we drain the swamp? What is our President going to do with this one? I hope he lays it all out on tv for all of us to see. Enough is enough.

              Thank you for the article link, it answered some important questions for me.

              Liked by 4 people

        • LibertyVibe says:

          This is called Project Dragnet. It is also on Drudge.

          Liked by 5 people

        • law4lifeblog says:

          I discovered Alex Jones around the same I found CTH in Fall 2015….. I cannot do without either now. I have found the overwhelming majority of infowars stories to be spot on, and I am NOT easy to please.

          Liked by 5 people

        • LibertyVibe says:

          I agree with you about the topless Alex. Rachel Madow commented about it, now he has it front and center for triggering purposes. Sadly, we are the ones who pay. I just remind myself that this IS a war, and sometimes torture is a part of the battle.

          Liked by 4 people

          • Shadrach says:

            Topless Alex is just there to sell vitamins supplements. Can’t sell vitamins if people think you’re fat. He looks fat, but isn’t fat, photo proves it. No more (or less) than that. Blame the people who took his ad revenue away for the display. Frankly if it were me (if I weren’t female) I’d be topless showing my muscles to sell my supplements too, if I needed to sell them as a source of revenue to keep my site solvent.


        • odious debt says:

          That’s ok, Daniel, Alex Jones doesn’t hold too much faith in you, either.


        • Sharon says:

          You sound like you watch to much mainstream media! They say the same thing about Alex jones! Do you hate him as much as the mainstream media? Alex jones has brought a lot of supporters and voters to trump! We don’t have much media to tell us the truth so why are you so picky about Alex! Alex has opened a lot of people’s eyes of what is really going on and the main stream media sure would not tell you some of the things Alex does or some of his speakers he has on! I wish some of you people would stop bitching about Alex! We should appreciate we have him geez!! Go ahead and rely on your main stream media for all your news!


      • remuda2016 says:

        Interesting that he’s been invited to testify before Congress so often before…as a person “who needs no introduction…” (?)

        Liked by 4 people

      • CleanhouseinDC says:

        You can be sure there won’t be an evidence trail to Obama, So the press and Dems will all be squealing that Trump is wrong because “Obama didn’t order it. It was rogue elements in the government.” And as such, Trump needs to be impeached.


      • cjzak says:

        Is there any info that the people were being surveilled during the campaign? This was old information it seems and they have nothing after 2010? Is that correct?

        I hope somebody has more that is up to date, because the committee today is just ripping into the whole surveillance thing along with the fake Russia ties. Not sure this Corsi info is relevant to what is going down in Congress right now. They need some strong info to provide to counter attack this whole liberal Dem propaganda match today that the press will just eat up and publicize for all they’re worth.

        So far, the repubs on the committee are pretty much sitting on their hands. I am getting madder by the minute over their lack of even trying to make the Dems look like the liars they are.

        Liked by 3 people

      • BigMamaTEA says:

        It hasn’t “leaked yet”. LibertyVibe.

        Liked by 1 person

    • SteveInCO says:

      You beat me to it.

      Russia! Russia! Russia! is likely to completely overshadow this, unless Gorsuch manages to step in it bigtime today (very, very unlikely).

      Liked by 10 people

      • LibertyVibe says:

        Did you hear Corsi’s info? I don’t know how they are going to get out of this one. It isn’t just about Trump. They spied on thousands of people. Corsi has their names, and phone numbers, all given to him by a Whistleblower.

        Liked by 4 people

        • Sentient says:

          If they spy on everyone, then Trump wasn’t targeted. Therefore Trump is paranoid and Hitler. See how easy that was?

          Liked by 4 people

          • wolfmoon1776 says:

            The thing is, the larger pattern will reveal much. WHO was spied on will matter, and will reveal all sorts of things. That’s why a total, partially redacted leak will tell a huge story.

            Or Congress can address the issue of “pre-spying” in a way that we actually get a vote on it. Their choice.


    • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

      Well. we all know what to expect from the fifth columnists in the fourth estate.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Dogstar_K9 says:

      I think that is exactly what POTUS Trump did. Waited for everybody to shoot their mouth’s off and then reveal the evidence.
      Egg on face!

      Liked by 5 people

  3. cosmo221 says:


    Can’t wait for the next one.


    Liked by 2 people

  4. Gadge says:

    Why bother with this..Just go with the nuclear option. Dems are gonna fillabuster.. Trump still doesn’t have a full cabinet 3 months later


    • Paul Killinger says:

      Which is primarily the fault of the Republican majority Senate for tolerating this nonsense from these Democrat low-lifes, isn’t it?

      Liked by 8 people

    • Rafael says:

      The Judge himself doesn’t want to be ‘the one that got in with 50’. Trying to work with Democrats on this is better for Gorsuch.

      Liked by 1 person

      • fred2w says:

        Besides some of the Democrat Senators on the Hill now voted for Gorsuch in the past. It would be awkward for them get obstructionist.


      • law4lifeblog says:

        Rafael, I don’t think it matters one whit the vote count….as long as he’s confirmed. The problem with even the nuclear option is that there are democrats dressed as Republicans, like McCrazy, Susan Collins and a few other dregs… will be all we can do to get 50 plus Pence.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Shadrach says:

        The Dems are in a Catch-22 situation. They vote in Gorsuch, their base is pissed, so they lose. They vote against Grouch, they get overturned by a nuclear option which will be used against them in the future for a less-appealing candidate.

        Let the Dems get in the way. They have no choice, because their base has no understanding of long-term benefits. Then the Reps can use the nuclear option (majority), which they will win. Then they can use it again with the next nominee, who might just be the Scalia replacement…heee heeee

        I need more popcorn.


    • Founding Fathers Fan says:

      Actually, this is day 60 but I get your point.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Kristin says:

    Good luck Judge Gorsuch!

    Liked by 2 people

  6. uc i says:

    President Trump,

    March 12, 2017, 12:29am

    President Trump,

    Thank you for fighting for our Republic.

    Please promptly release and publish every list of American citizen “terrorists” that our domestic enemies, elected and non-elected, have assembled as part of their ongoing efforts to enslave our citizens and overthrow our nation.

    By doing this, you will gain tremendous, active support for your efforts to “drain the swamp”.

    Please publicly televise new swearing-in ceremonies of all elected federal office holders, federal judges, all members of security agencies, Cabinet Secretaries, and Washington, D.C., bureaucrats.

    We the people need to watch our “public servants” re-commit their allegiance to our Constitution while they touch The Holy Bible.

    No paper barriers or other gimmicks allowed.

    Thank you for your efforts and your commitment to your voters.

    May you focus on rapidly arresting and prosecuting traitors, starting top-down, instead of bottom up.

    May I suggest two approaches that will empower our efforts to MAGA ?

    1. Racketeering charges, using RICO, against every traitor involved in the co-ordinated, group efforts to steal the 2016 elections and their continuing attempts to overthrow the results of November 8, 2016. There is ample public evidence presented by the vocal leaders of these attempted coups to jail them, NOW.

    2. Arrest and file accessory-to-murder charges against every official, elected, appointed, or hired, who has enabled illegal invaders to enter our country, stay here, and abuse our welfare systems while they rape, murder, and steal money, property, and jobs from our citizens.

    Thank you, again.

    We fervently pray, daily, for your continuing wisdom, health, discernment, and protection.

    cMarch 12, 2017, 1:11am
    March 20, 9:25am

    Liked by 11 people

  7. Enlightened Vulgarian says:

    A Spectator’s Guide to the Gorsuch Hearings….

    “What’s All This Business About Chevron Deference, The Right of Privacy, and… Stare Decisis?”


  8. Paul Killinger says:

    I’m grateful Sen Grassley is chairing this committee in lieu of some nitwit like McCain.

    Liked by 4 people

    • BigMamaTEA says:

      I don’t know, I was watching the other one. It’s now 2:39pmCST, DiFi is speaking and I see you need one of these over here too:


  9. Dora says:

    I can’t stand this man. Look at that expression. He’s got a face like a liberal!

    Liked by 4 people

  10. jambo says:

    New thread for the Comey hearing?


  11. GOUSAAMER114 says:

    I want clarity from Gorsuch that he will vote with us on immigration. I hope to hear him say something to the tune of, of course the President has all authority on immigration. Congress makes the laws and the President can choose who comes into the country. He can choose to block whomever he pleases.

    Let’s see


  12. entagor says:

    DEMs are saving their ammo on Gorsuch for the hearings while they try to create outrage. They are weak. Their only ace is Uniparty GOP’s not defending Trump

    DEMs are really shoving the Russia angle. I get that ‘Russia hacked the election’ is supposed to work like ‘Bush was not elected’ but it isn’t playing in flyover. Too Boris and Natasha

    Townhall-disruption is also playing to the choir. During the Tea Party, thugs sent to punch old people at townhalls backfired. This time strategists avoided that faux pas by sending out whole audiences and I am hearing crickets

    DEMs are playing only to their base. A crowd with pitchfork sounds under a ‘Trump Fading’ banner. Globalist DEMs should not be insulted to be called Replaceables

    Les Replaceables
    Do you hear the snowflakes sing
    Singing the songs of the UN
    It is the music of a sheeple who would not be free again
    When the feeding of your face
    Exceeds the bleeding of your land
    There is a boat about to land
    Where the border stood

    Liked by 10 people

  13. Mike diamond says:

    Prayt that this conservative supreme court judge is approved ! Growdy is right on!


  14. paulraven1 says:

    Guaranteed to be farcical and depressing, as these things always are.


  15. Bonitabaycane says:

    Gorsuch is one of the most eminently qualified judges nominated for the SCOTUS. The Dems, on the other hand, are among the least qualified individuals to determine Gorsuch’s qualifications for the SCOTUS.

    Liked by 8 people

  16. rashamon says:

    Good grief, Charlie Brown, we have the true “professional political class” ruling over this committee. Leahy has testified to 16 — sixteen — SCOTUS nominees? Forty years for others serving as Congresscritters?! Durbin? I think he was born on the floor of Congress.

    What happened to serving a term or two, then going home? What happened to earning the major part of your daily bread from working the land, or as a merchant or a doctor, IT developer, or entrepreneur back in your hometown with the role of Congresscritter being a temporary position?

    The need for these politicians to spend more time at their political job is only because they have grown the Federal government, grown their jobs, grown themselves to “masters of all they survey.”

    Hey! Retire, go home, get off the gravy train, find your wealth elsewhere. How odd that people who have modest net worth’s — and perhaps are in debt — when they enter office leave with millions and more to come with side deals and insider trading.

    The Deplorables are tired of you all. Go away.

    Liked by 10 people

  17. oldgrunt68 says:

    They will not approve Gorsuch. They are going to try to impeach Trump. Look at the insults at the hearing today…not calling him President Trump, but just Trump.

    The Repubs are in on it. Comey is a crook.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. History Teaches says:

    What’s with Drudge again? Top headline is a link to the Washington Post for the usual distorted misinformation. Not liking Drudge in recent months.

    Liked by 3 people

    • americalsgt says:

      It seems as if Drudge has been gotten to. All of the headlines go to the Post or Times.

      Liked by 1 person

      • 3x1 says:

        Send a complaint to his tip line.

        Both WaPo & NYT require subscription after a couple freebies. Ask him if he is getting a commission.

        (don’t mention left or right politicians, just keep it on NYT & WaPo)

        His credibility would be wrecked if he was getting pay per clicks from either.

        Be nice, he links to GP and other good guys. Just ask to link to non-Subscription media.

        Liked by 3 people

  19. Pam says:

    Liked by 1 person

    • angryduc says:

      I’m concerned he is a globalist wacko. I have no facts for this just my fear after listening to him. Lots of syrup. Anyone the Lindsey Graham adores is a cause for concern. I keep waiting for someone to capone …Ms. Graham.


  20. amwick says:

    I just listened to Hon. Neil Gorsuch’s opening statement. Humble and wise, but I hope his guardian angels are with him.

    Liked by 2 people

  21. Mike diamond says:

    Dian fienstien,o my gosh,she comes up with some Wopper weird stuff,during judge. Gorsughs hearing, these liberal Democrats are moonbats!

    Liked by 2 people

  22. wyntre says:

    I did NOT like some of Gorsuch’s opening statement, especially when he thanked his friends “liberals, conservatives and Independents.”

    Why did he say “Liberals” first.

    He comes across as too freaking perfect. Maybe he is the best least-bad choice but I’m not convinced he’ll be another Scalia. Reminds me of Romney – GOPe..

    Liked by 1 person

  23. mrt721 says:

    Judge Gorsuch talked about Justice Robert Jackson in his opening remarks.
    A preview of how he feels about the constitutionality of President Trump’s travel ban?
    I posted this (somewhere?) a couple of weeks ago:
    “Decisions involving foreign policy, including alien threats to national security, are political, not judicial in nature.”

    “Thus, they are wholly confided by our constitution to the political departments of the government, executive and legislative. They are delicate, complex, and involve large elements of prophecy. They are and should be undertaken only by those directly responsible to the people whose welfare they advance or imperil.

    “They are decisions of a kind for which the judiciary has neither aptitude, facilities, nor responsibility, and have long been held to belong in the domain of political power, not subject to judicial intrusion or inquiry.~~~Majority opinion, Justice Robert Jackson,
    SCOTUS case ~~ Chicago & Southern Airlines v. Waterman, 1948

    You remember Justice Robert Jackson, right?
    Attorney General under your progressive god, FDR?
    Chief prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials?
    SCOTUS Justice?

    Next, in 1952, the Legislature added “Whenever…”, codified it and made it stature law.

    “Whenever the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

    That’s what’s known as ‘black-letter’, no-two-ways-about-it, etched-in-stone, set-precedent LAW.”


  24. Mike diamond says:

    Wonder if dian fienstien,and dick durbin and other Democrats were wire tapped through the years,it would’ve interesting,the american people would be freaking out as to what they said!!!!.!


  25. I caught a twitter rant from someone saying Gorsuch shouldn’t be confirmed while Potus is under investigation.(grrr..)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s