Fear and Fascism – California Judge Bars Release of More Planned Parenthood Expose’ Videos…

lambo 1LOS ANGELES – A temporary restraining order has been issued preventing an anti-abortion group from releasing any video of leaders of a California company that provides fetal tissue to researchers.

The group is the same one that previously shot viral covert video of a Planned Parenthood leader discussing the sale of aborted fetuses for research.

The Los Angeles Superior Court order issued Tuesday prohibits the Center for Medical Progress from releasing any video of three high-ranking StemExpress officials taken at a restaurant in May. It appears to be the first legal action prohibiting the release of a video from the organization.

The Center for Medical Progress has released three surreptitiously recorded videos to date that have riled anti-abortion activists. The Senate is expected to vote before its August recess on a Republican effort to bar federal aid to Planned Parenthood in the aftermath of the videos’ release.

In a statement Wednesday, center leader David Daleiden said StemExpress was using “meritless litigation” to cover up an “illegal baby parts trade.” (read more)

Coexist anti-abortion poster

This entry was posted in Choose Life, Christian Values, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Dem Hypocrisy, Desperately Seeking Hillary, media bias, Notorious Liars, Occupy Type Moonbats, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

115 Responses to Fear and Fascism – California Judge Bars Release of More Planned Parenthood Expose’ Videos…

  1. barbi says:

    Why can’t they release it in another state? Fast?

    Liked by 11 people

    • John Galt says:

      They could have already sent them to somebody, like Wiki Leaks, over which they have no control.

      Liked by 2 people

      • jakeandcrew says:

        From the article:

        Melaney Linton, president of (the Houston PP) clinic, said in written testimony that one individual was shown an area where tissue is processed after an abortion. She said the video “will be difficult for many people to see.”

        Is that their legal justification for banning it? Of course, it will be difficult to see – that’s the point! They’re desperately trying to keep their evil work secret, in the dark, hidden. Once it is exposed, their guilt and despicable actions will be laid bare for all the world to see.

        Linton also said there could be several interactions initiated by BioMax about how and whether a doctor could adjust an abortion if the patient has offered to donate tissue for medical research. She said Planned Parenthood believes the videos, when released, will be manipulated.

        Anti-abortion activists, under the banner of the previously obscure Center for Medical Progress, released multiple videos secretly recorded in 2014 and 2015 by people posing as buyers of fetal tissue. Planned Parenthood calls the groups extremists and says the videos were deceptively edited.

        PP needs to be called on this every time they say it. When CMP releases an edited video, they also post the entire, uncut video on their website. It’s all there. Manipulation and deceptive editing of the videos is not possible. It is a non-issue.

        Texas health officials, who were also called to testify at the hearing, said state investigators over the past several years have received complaints about improper disposal of fetal issue at abortion clinics but never substantiated any of the allegations.

        Stericycle, a company that disposes of the aborted remains, pretty much has a monopoly with abortion clinics nationwide. Evidently, even they don’t follow the rules…


        Of course, some abortion clinics, ala Gosnell’s, “take care” of it themselves. There are some real horror stories here, proceed with caution…


        The evil just gets more and more despicable. It takes your breath away.

        It must be stopped!

        Liked by 1 person

    • archer52 says:

      They will. Good luck one judge having jurisdiction. Then it will be court time and another round of “Now, let me play these videos and you tell me which one you think is inaccurate. Okay Fred, hit play. By the way, you don’t mind we use the big wall in the courtroom do ya’ judge?”


  2. MaryfromMarin says:

    What right do they have to do that???

    But obviously, “over target”.

    The forthcoming videos must be beyond belief.

    Liked by 13 people

  3. Burnt Toast says:

    Knowing that some fascist judge would try to impose an injunction I would have already dumped them to multiple third parties.

    Liked by 6 people

  4. auscitizenmom says:

    What we need now is a “hacker” to get it and release it.

    Liked by 6 people

  5. Daniel says:

    Does anyone think there could possibly be that kind of ban in place if the exposure was about… oh, let’s say, a large church chain (running charities and enjoying tax-exempt status) was exposed for some sort of criminal activity? They’d be demanding (and rightfully so) that their tax exempt status be rescinded among other things. But NO ONE would try to censor it.

    These moments bring to light the true anti-American ideals of these people.

    Liked by 8 people

  6. Chip Bennett says:

    Under what authority?

    Judges think they are above the law. Screw them. The order is an obvious example of prior restraint, which is nakedly unconstitutional. Release the videos, and break out the tar and feathers for the black-robed tyrants.

    Liked by 21 people

    • John Galt says:

      It is a TRO, probably issued ex parte. The only thing that the judge has done is preserve the status quo until the hearing on the merits.

      “The temporary restraining order issued Tuesday will remain in place until a hearing on Aug. 19.”


      • Chip Bennett says:

        But how is it not prior restraint? Especially since the judge would have no way of knowing the content of the videos prior to their publication, there would be no basis whatsoever to opine regarding the legality of that content. And even if the content were known and determined to be illegal, prohibiting its publication would still be unconstitutional prior restraint.

        This is where I don’t understand lawyer logic. The status quo is not maintained, because first amendment rights that were not violated prior to the TRO now are being violated.

        Liked by 6 people

        • John Galt says:

          TRO based on an allegation of illegal recording in violation of wire tapping statute.


          • MrAleGuy says:

            CA is a two-party consent state. They stand a good chance of shutting down (at least) the videos taken on their property.

            It’s just too bad that some hacker already downloaded the videos… 😉

            Liked by 1 person

          • archer52 says:

            I would love to see the proof of that. If the conversation is occurring with three parties, there should be no expectation of privacy, nor if in public. Also, if the parties are involved in criminal activity and the persons recording are private citizens there is a far lower bar to meet.

            And as others have said, release the videos, let them float around the Internet and see if they can put the genie back in the bottle. Good luck with that.


  7. kinthenorthwest says:

    When we finally put up a barrier around our southern border it needs to go from east to west across the middle of Calif, and down the Nevada Arizona border to the Rio Grande. Let the Hollywood people have fun with the Illegals since they like them so much.

    Liked by 10 people

  8. kingofsigham says:

    Wonder how long til we find out who the judge is, who they contribute to, and what charitable functions they attend.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. MouseTheLuckyDog says:

    A Senator should require that someone testify about the videos. They should also require that person bring the videos. Then court can’t force the person not to hand over the video to a Senator. Then the Senator should release the videos.

    Let’s see a judge try and stop that!

    Liked by 4 people

  10. justfactsplz says:

    The unreleased videos must be real incriminating doozies. This is censorship. I am with Chip, by what authority did this judge do this? This is freedom of speech being impeded. Wonder if the judge was bribed.

    Liked by 7 people

  11. franker01 says:

    The Lamborghini Doc looks like she may go on to a successful career as a Depends Model.

    Liked by 2 people

  12. chopp5 says:

    In California it is a misdemeanor to record someone without their permission. So I think based on that they sought and obtained an injunction. Anyone know the name of the judge? They shd bombard the internet with these videos.


  13. John Galt says:

    “A company spokesman said StemExpress is “grateful its rights have been vindicated in a court of law.”

    LOL, the matter hasn’t even been litigated.


    Liked by 2 people

  14. barbi says:

    I just read the post on this at Red State. They say that Fox News is reporting that only the StemExpress folks are protected by the injunction, NOT PP.

    Liked by 3 people

  15. robertnotsowise says:

    Meaningless…. Just some chest thumping

    Liked by 2 people

  16. Nation says:

    Here is the civil complaint: http://popehat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/StemExpress_Complaint.pdf

    After a quick skim, it appears StemExpress is arguing that the restaurant meeting that was secretly recorded was a “confidential communication” and thus within the purview of Cal. Penal Code 632. IDK about that one! Section 632 does not cover communications that one may reasonably expect may be overheard by others. Umm…they were discussing their nefarious deal in a restaurant. One would expect their conversation may be overheard by others in the restaurant…

    Liked by 5 people

    • John Galt says:


      “If you are recording someone without their knowledge in a public or semi-public place like a street or restaurant, the person whom you’re recording may or may not have “an objectively reasonable expectation that no one is listening in or overhearing the conversation,” and the reasonableness of the expectation would depend on the particular factual circumstances. Therefore, you cannot necessarily assume that you are in the clear simply because you are in a public place.”

      Looks like that will be the battle.

      Liked by 2 people

      • ctdar says:

        Not only public place but there was 4 people present at the table, so how could anyone expect privacy with that?

        Liked by 2 people

      • archer52 says:

        But that is what the hearing will be about. The judge ruling an order is his loyalty to the liberal cause. Not the law.

        What damage are they suffering IF the videos are an accurate representation of what they said? It would be like Ted Bundy going, “Well I’m a little upset that I was recorded saying I loved kidnapping and strangling women. Come on, where’s my rights here?!”


    • Burnt Toast says:

      Public place, or place open to the general public.


    • joshua says:

      was held in the open at a public restaurant….fails the “confidential communication” ruse due to venue per se.


  17. jim says:

    Does anyone know what is done with these human organs? These aren’t the undifferentiated stem cells they lied about delivering magic cures so that they could pursue human cloning.


  18. ftwphil says:

    Darkness will always run from light.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Jersey Beach says:

    And FYI House leaves for recess with no vote to defund PP until Sept. 8th.


  20. James F says:

    Has 60 minites ever been barred/censored from exposing crimes and corruption of private sector corporations that recieve government funding?

    Has Michael moore?

    Hell no!

    Liked by 4 people

  21. Nation says:

    I found the judge! She has interesting reviews on this website:


    Liked by 2 people

    • Nation says:

      btw, California gives litigants one peremptory challenge to disqualify (remove) a judge from the case. Cal. Civ. Code 170.6. So its pretty bad when reviewers are telling others to 170.6 this judge.

      Liked by 3 people

  22. auscitizenmom says:

    “Mind-Boggling Planned Parenthood Baby Parts Income Reported During TX Senate Hearing
    120k from in Houston facility alone!”

    Liked by 6 people

  23. TwoLaine says:

    Obama transparency record under fire again after request on Planned Parenthood denied

    “Obama transparency record under fire again after request on Planned Parenthood denied
    The outlet reached out to the Obama administration after learning about Deborah Nucatola being a Department of Health and Human Services contract adviser. Nucatola, a Planned Parenthood director for roughly 10 years, shot into the headlines last week after an undercover video appeared to show her discussing prices for fetal tissue and organs for research. The video, the first in a series, ignited a firestorm of controversy and news stories — for-profit sales of fetal tissue are illegal, though the group maintains they only donate tissue and no laws were broken.

    The Federalist, after learning of Nucatola’s government work, submitted a FOIA request on her likely fees and other contract details under “expedited processing.”

    However, the agency one day later denied the request for a prompt response, saying it failed to meet the public’s “urgent” right to know. HHS even suggested that the request did not meet the standard of referring to a “breaking news story of general public interest.” ”


    Liked by 3 people

  24. georgiafl says:

    David Daleiden and Lila Rose were on Hannity yesterday. The Center for Medical Progress has 300 hours of video! They are well aware of what can be legally released (public conversation that could be overheard) and what states allow taping with only one party having knowledge of it.

    Liked by 8 people

    • jackphatz says:

      Oh My! That’s more then enough to keep this fresh in everyone’s mind through election season. (as long as it’s not over done)


    • georgiafl says:

      “WASHINGTON — David Daleiden, founder of the Center For Medical Progress (CMP), told conservative talk radio host Sean Hannity Tuesday there are nine more sting-operation videos that reveal Planned Parenthood’s operations.

      “We have close to 300 hours total of undercover video that was gathered during a 30 month long in depth investigative journalism study of how Planned Parenthood sells the body parts of the babies they abort,” Daleiden said, noting that each highlight video released will have the full footage posted on their website without any edits.”


      Liked by 5 people

      • JohnP says:

        I’m getting a bad feeling. I hope they have multiple copies of the videos, in secure offshore storage. Planned Parenthood has way too much at stake to let this continue. These tapes are worth more than the Hope Diamond. I wouldn’t be shocked if they are seized as evidence or stolen.


  25. TwoLaine says:

    This is why we have people like Snowden.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Rob Crawford says:

      Except Snowden is a traitor — he ran to, and gave classified information to, countries that are threatening the US.

      Liked by 1 person

      • TwoLaine says:

        Your opinion or do you have proof?


      • Beowulf says:

        From what I’ve read, Snowden didn’t give docs to Chinese or Russians, he gave copies to American and British reporters and destroyed what he had (to prevent exactly what you fear he did). He’s hardly a traitor. He didn’t give aid and comfort to the enemy by revealing the U.S. govt illegally wiretapped US citizens unless you believe the enemy is the American people. The only reason he’s stuck in Russia is its impossible to for him to travel anywhere else without risk of the U.S. forcing down his plane to arrest him (our govt even forced the plane carrying the president of Bolivia to land in Austria because of rumors Snowden was on board).

        Liked by 1 person

        • John Galt says:

          “He didn’t give aid and comfort to the enemy by revealing the U.S. govt illegally wiretapped US citizens unless you believe the enemy is the American people.”

          I’m not sure that Snowden revealed anything not already known. NYT published articles on NSA illegal spying in December of 2005. EFF filed lawsuits with very detailed complaints in early 2006 after AT&T Technician Mark Klein blew the whistle.


  26. aprilyn43 says:

    So, is that just for the star of California; this is a Supreme Court Judge “from” California; it’s NOT a Federal judge.

    Liked by 2 people

  27. F.D.R. in Hell says:

    ICYMI… h/t: iOTWReport
    Here’s what Liberalism (like meth) can do to a face.

    Mary Gatter in college.


  28. dohfugwimee says:

    Release them ANYWAY!!!!!

    Liked by 1 person

  29. cg says:

    Reblogged this on Catholic Glasses.


  30. bodicacia says:

    Here are some companies distancing themselves from PP. Followed by a list of PP supporters.


    Liked by 2 people

    • TheLastDemocrat says:

      March of Dimes has developed an official position that they are neutral on abortion – they act like they are just gonna stick to reduction of children born with birth defects.

      I guess not.


  31. shirley49 says:

    I knew this was going to happen. Hope they did too.


  32. LadyRavenSDC says:

    Reblogged this on LadyRaven's Whisky In A Jar – OH! and commented:

    Well that certainly didn’t take long and clearly points out that there are some “folks” very uncomfortable at this moment. Can’t help but wonder if our “God bless Planned Parenthood” pResident might have used his trusty phone to call the judge.

    Liked by 1 person

  33. Maquis says:

    I pray they have already seen this coming, and have full copies of these recordings in every Fifty States! Not all in their own hands either….tie their hands, and other hands act independently, and ruthlessly. This is the time to force Americans to see the MONSTERS they ignore, allow, and enable. I sent a bit of a rant letter to my beloved Senators in WA and to Senate “leadership”, did a bit of a riff on the Screwtape Letters. I want to see these streamed everywhere, on Wikileaks, on Pirate Bay, on bootleg DVDs, nice if a hacker could put these on cable 24 hours a day on every channel! Except SyFy, though I could do without the WWWhatever freak show…

    I hope people go to jail. I hope people eat bullets. I want these ********s humiliated and hiding just like the killer of Cecil the Lion, except, you know, they actually killed MILLIONS of BABIES. Dear Lord, what a world.

    SMOD, where art thou?


    • jakeandcrew says:

      Oh, He’s there, and He sees it all:

      “These things you have done and I kept silence;
      You thought that I was just like you;
      I will reprove you and state the case in order before your eyes.
      “Now consider this, you who forget God,
      Or I will tear you in pieces, and there will be none to deliver.

      Psalm 50:21-22


  34. Tkim says:

    I wish someone would start a rumor that only black baby parts were being sold. So maybe there would be 24 hour media coverage.

    Martin O’Malley would be all in. And a Obama would have the DOJ padlocking facilities until they could get to the bottom of it.

    Although pro life women and men are getting vocal about these videos, I can almost hear TPTB reminding his employees that the “religious nuts” who are against abortion will fade away, with manufactured “news” stories to hasten us along.

    But my prayer is that finally, somehow, the fact of SEVENTY MILLION dead children will realized, noted, and the outage will grow into an unstoppable movement.

    And it begins with the words: ALL LIVES MATTER.

    Funny how we need to be brave to say that. Because, as we keep being told, that is a racist statement.

    God help us all.

    Liked by 5 people

  35. buckwheaton says:

    Wise conservatives will see this as several lessons:

    1) Entrenched members of the liberal (er, now “progressive”) establishment will do what they can to respond to attacks on their secular religion. Clearly these videos are a threat to The Way We Want Things To Be. They must be stopped at all costs, even insulting the very rights that liberals once scolded the rest of us about, principally the right of free speech and freedom of the press;

    2) Anyone who gathers evidence of similar nature in the future must protect it by placing copies in the hands of trusted people outside of their home jurisdiction, so as to preclude it from being suppressed when the Progressive HiveMind wages successful law-fare against it.

    Liked by 2 people

  36. Is Planned Parenthood paying sales tax on the money they receive for organs? Or are treating the income as donations?


  37. georgiafl says:

    Planned Parenthood is not just doing dangerous late term abortions – it is giving out DANGEROUS ADVICE TO TEENS – as this video reveals:

    Remember, these people are now also ‘educating’ Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts. Some of the PP literature to these groups is going to get negative outcomes – a rise in STDs as well as pregnancies and abortions…which is what they want.

    Liked by 1 person

    • TheLastDemocrat says:

      slight correction – the boy scout organization has been totally separate from the girl scout organization for many decades; also, BSA does not have any collaboration with PP – if I am not up-to-date, please post a link or something.

      Girl Scouts has been heavily involved with PP as just part of their overall Marxist efforts to get the girls focused on being the change in the world, finding their issue for changing the world, fostering their activism, etc.
      This second, ‘advocacy’ book has some advocacy guidance, plus little profiles of role-models – billie jean king and so on.

      Liked by 3 people

      • georgiafl says:

        My Mistake – you are right.

        I started typing about BS and GS supporting PP (and probably vice versa)…and then moved to a different facet and set of facts.

        There is a connection between GS, BS and PP in that these ‘charitable organizations’ move money to PP and Democrat politicians and vice versa. Someone posted a link at CTH of the ‘charitable’ organizations connected by $$$ to PP, which I didn’t save.

        Liked by 1 person

        • georgiafl says:

          OH YES I DID save the link:


          Charities that fund Planned Parenthood:
          United Way, Red Cross, AARP, American Cancer Society, Amnesty International, Audubon Society, Dr. Phil Foundation, Human Rights Watch, Juvenile Diabetes Foundation, Kiwanis Clubs, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Lions Clubs, March of Dimes, Michael J. Fox Foundation, Muscular Dystrophy Association, Paralyzed Veterans of America, Parkinson’s Disease Foundation, Ronald McDonald House Charities, Rotary Clubs, Salvation Army, Save the Children, Sierra Club, Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, YMCA, and YWCA, Elton John AIDS Foundation, Boys & Girls Clubs, Camp Fire, Eagles Clubs, Elks Clubs, Girl Scouts, Girls Inc.

          Again – I was wrong and you are right – it was Boys and Girls CLUBS, not Scouts.

          Apologies to everyone!

          Liked by 1 person

      • Jett Black says:

        What progs have been and are trying to do to girls and women is about the most disgusting of their “programs.” Essentially, they’re doing everything they can to make women worker/drone/breeders and sexual service-providers, with minimal emotional connection with their partners or children. They promote sexual promiscuity/birth control/abortion, combined with career orientation to further that agenda. Meanwhile, they lie that it’s all about making the woman feel good and feel good about herself. Never mind that they’re destroying all aspects and meaningful connections of life that provide true references for self-worth and love.

        Liked by 1 person

    • georgiafl says:

      PLEASE READ the Legal Insurrection article. This is the same LIVE ACTION group Lila Rose/David Daleiden. They caught PP giving sick, sick advice such as urnating and deecating on se*ual partner, and other perverse and dangerous (injurious, disease causing) acts.

      Some PP officials are actually saanists. Cheers to saan were heard during the protests at the State Capitol in TX when silly tacky ambitious Wendy whatshername was prissing around in her pink tennis shoes.


  38. Maquis says:

    The more promiscuity PP can inspire, the more their cash flows grow in response. Sick.


  39. Beowulf says:

    This is why whistleblowers should always give copies to third parties. If TX AG already has copies, sounds like this was done.

    Liked by 3 people

  40. czarowniczy says:

    PP just went judge-shopping for a TRO – SOP for a SOB


    • bodicacia says:

      “Another boy!” Said with such jubilation.

      Such evil.

      Oh.. may God bless these little souls. Little babies being probed in petri dishes.

      Liked by 3 people

      • michellc says:

        I guess killing boys is an extra notch in their belt.

        So they found a leg, a stomach, a heart, brain, liver and male organs but I guess that’s not a baby. OOps they even said it’s a baby.


  41. labman57 says:

    Mindset of Daleiden and his fellow O’Keefe-esque propagandists at the ‘Center for Medical Progress’:
    Ours is a righteous cause, and therefore we are are not beholden to state laws or the standard ethics of journalism and documentary production.


    • taqiyyologist says:


      And where are these “standard ethics” in any MSM “news” production in the last thirty years?

      Open your eyes, labman. Propaganda? This is anti-propaganda.

      I wish I could mail you those sunglasses from the film They Live.

      You don’t see because you cannot.

      Will not becomes cannot, given enough training and discipline. Sad, but true.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Jett Black says:

      Not sure where this comment is coming from–seems what they’re really saying is, “Our cause is righteous, so we’ll pursue it righteously, fully adhering to the highest standards of journalistic ethics, etc.” That’s why they’ve been careful, e.g., to record in public places or where invited to observe and have always released full video with the fairly edited versions. If mainstream and particularly prog journos were half as ethical and fair in what they do, they could not be prog journos and MSM news would look a whole lot more like objective reality than it does.

      Liked by 1 person

    • georgiafl says:

      It’s NOT PROPAGANDA – it’s truth about a blight on America’s heart and mind and conscience….the ISIS-and-Hitler-like minds of the people who run PP.


  42. taqiyyologist says:



  43. Pingback: Fear and Fascism – California Judge Bars Release of More Planned Parenthood Expose’ Videos… | Grumpy Opinions

  44. Anyone who has ever had an abortion is going to have a hard time with this information.


  45. jetstream says:

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s