Trey Gowdy Requests Two Hillary Clinton Appearances for Questions – First on email, Second on Benghazi – (FULL pdf Letter)

Trey Gowdy, Chairman of The House Select Committee on Benghazi, has requested former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton appear before the panel next month.

In a letter to Clinton attorney David Kendall (below) Gowdy asks that Hillary testify before the committee “the week of May 18” to discuss email issues; and again before June 18 to talk about the deadly Benghazi attack (9/11/2012)

House Select Committee on the Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in Benghazi

This entry was posted in Benghazi-Gate, Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Cultural Marxism, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Election 2016, media bias, Notorious Liars, Operation Zero Footprint, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Secretary of State, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

28 Responses to Trey Gowdy Requests Two Hillary Clinton Appearances for Questions – First on email, Second on Benghazi – (FULL pdf Letter)

  1. Father Paul Lemmen says:

    Reblogged this on A Conservative Christian Man.

    Like

  2. Kin Mapper says:

    It would be unexpected if the unquestioned obstruction of Congress be delved into and well-identified in the first appearance in May Then we also can go to

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 – Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

    (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

    and eliminate one of our minions of corrupt lawyers from ever again holding office.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Kin Mapper says:

      Wny is the well-known criminal code cited in the prior post not discussed each time the issue of Hillary allowing anyone destroy, in her name or failing to perform her instructions not to do so, without having an appropriate neutral government arbiter such as a high-ranking archivist.

      No not even that should allow destruction.

      All records should be retained behind a fire wall and off-line, in at least two locations to avoid IED like events, subject to a final decision in all proceedings, then on-going and soon to be on-going, made by our less-than-august and quite corrupt Supreme Court of the United States [SCOTUS]. Hillary had no right to have others violate 18 U.S. Code § 2071 in her name and it is time the criminality of this conduct be highlighted in bright lights lit in perpetuity.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. agent provocateur says:

    Reblogged this on Nevada State Personnel Watch.

    Like

  4. Kin Mapper says:

    Hillary was guilty of violation of violation of the second section of 18 U.S. Code § 2071 from the very moment Hillary left her office!

    Trey Gowdy testifies these records were concealed from him by the actions of this wondrous lawyer. Case over.

    Like

  5. fred says:

    Lots of demands and lots of blustering Trey but you have not one victory of any kind against blatant lawlessness. That says they are the greatest stonewallers in history or your efforts are half hearted. Now Lynch is AG and she will block any more attempts. Shut it down or get serious Trey this posturing is boring.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Kin Mapper says:

      Trey also needs to explain a failure to mention 18 U.S. Code § 2071 in connection to the concealment of the e0mails from his committee and from the Department of State prior to the deletion of half of them by Hillary.

      My grandfather’s grandfather held Trey’s SC#4 slot many congressmen back and would have found that law if there then and was not educated in the law separately but could understand right from wrong.

      Why are we not pointing out the federal criminal law Hillary violated even before the destrcution of much of her government records, by its hymn number:

      18 U.S. Code § 2071 and sing it in writing regularly?

      Liked by 2 people

    • Kin Mapper says:

      Anyone could get Hillary convicted of violation of

      18 U.S. Code § 2071

      for her actions prior to the destruction of the e-mails as it has been admitted that they were not made available by Hillary (and worse Hillary used her concealment of the records to ultimately destroy oh so many of them in violations of 18 U.S. Code § 2071).

      Still thanks for the link to the lawyer’s b.s. which was no better than the b.s. used by Hillary that even the simpletons of the public felt was false and idiotic in the 21st century.

      Like

  6. BigMamaTEA says:

    Liked by 2 people

  7. rashomon says:

    U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 101 › § 2071

    (a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
    (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

    Copy and send by e-mail or U.S.P.S. or both to your Congresscritters and Mr. Gowdy. They, in case they have forgotten, work for us.

    Liked by 3 people

  8. JAS says:

    I’m going to be as clear and to the point as I can. Why in the World would they want to question HRC about emails? What this shows to me is that these people are either clueless or in collusion.

    HRC cannot answer the key questions, those are beyond her level of understanding. You see, setting up an email server at the level the Clinton’s would have one set up is quite the complex undertaking and WAY beyond the scope of HRC’s understanding.. In my day I set up home systems, including email servers, for some powerful business people. Guess what? The systems needed constant and expensive maintenance. The end users had no clue on how to deal with the workings of the systems and they expected 100% up time. So there was someone managing HRC’s server – constantly.

    So, it make much more sense to subpoena the SYSTEM GUY. Closed doors, offer him/her immunity and take it from there.

    They will never do it.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Kin Mapper says:

      JAS re-read the relevant law, go to law school and give it proper legal interpretation to see that Hillary was culpable with the first F.O.I.A. request (and the many times thereafter), while still in office as Secretary of State that Hillary hid her e-mail from a response:

      For the crime, the server guy is irrelevant:

      “18 U.S. Code § 2071 – Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

      (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”

      Prosecute her and disqualify her from any more offices and any more sales of the American people, their uranium, their security and their honor.

      Like

      • JAS says:

        “For the crime, the server guy is irrelevant”

        On the contrary. He is the key. It’s not like that server was sitting in a corner unattended. The guy/gal knows exactly what went on in that server and can testify as to the what, where, when and how. Probably kept backups too – I would have.

        Like

        • JAS says:

          Furthermore, the system person would have information about the server logs. Email servers log every single IP address that makes contact with the server when the server receives an email receipt request. Now, if HRC just deleted the emails, those logs are still available.

          Even if the server was wiped clean, as in a “catastrophic” failure, the log backups should still be available. And I guarantee it, beyond hitting the delete key on the emails HRC has no further knowledge on how to do the rest. She would have had to order some other person to do the heavy lifting, and that some other person would be the “system guy”.

          Like

    • ctdar says:

      He’s probably buried in Fort Marcy Park.

      Liked by 2 people

  9. The lawyer’s response was on April 22nd. Gowdy’s letter asking for appearance in in reply on the 23rd. I’m sure someone is changing her pantsuit right about now.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Col.(R) Ken says:

    Tray Gowdy, “All Hat, No Cattle,”

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s