Josh Earnest: Hillary Clinton “Was a very effective Secretary of State” For Obama….

The body language of delivery is as telling as the construct within the notes of continual reference.

This entry was posted in Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Dear Leader - Creepy POTUS Worship, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Election 2016, media bias, Notorious Liars, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Secretary of State. Bookmark the permalink.

33 Responses to Josh Earnest: Hillary Clinton “Was a very effective Secretary of State” For Obama….

  1. justfactsplz says:

    It is so sickening watching Josh lie that I can’t bear to watch him everyday.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Do you ever find it ironic that his last name is “Earnest?” I think it’s ironic all the time.

      Liked by 2 people

      • justfactsplz says:

        I never made the connection but it’s funny.

        Like

      • kathyca says:

        I think that’s why they picked him. I’m not even joking.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Roy says:

          I earnestly believe you.

          Like

        • Judgy says:

          It’s about a valid a reason as the Dems have for running Hillary as their top candidate–because of HER last name.

          I found the scariest/ most hilarious comment on HuffPo last night (always good to keep your eye on the enemy). The article, which I was surprised they even printed, was “Hillary Clinton Team Holds Off-the-Record Journalist Dinner Ahead of 2016 Announcement”; 4/10/2015. At first, I thought maybe I’d accidentally clicked on The Onion, but I think it’s real…….

          From the Facebook account of one Anthony Placebo (talk about last names!):

          “The lady has paid her dues by sticking by her husband through thick and thin, & has never had anything major pinned on her, despite strong efforts to do so.

          She may be deceptive, secretive, & vindictive, but she experienced & she is not only a woman, but she will be the same age as Reagan was if she takes office. That will be historical”.

          Well, okay then. Since you put it THAT way. LOL!

          Liked by 1 person

  2. Yeah. I totally believe that a woman who could not manage two email accounts was an effective secretary of state.

    Makes perfect sense.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. moehamhead says:

    hes not lying
    she was very effective for obozo
    she sucked just like he wanted her to

    Like

  4. aprilyn43 says:

    Is there a school where you learn to lie through your eye teeth or are you born with this natural ability?
    There was a time when truth, honesty, integrity were valued; but then again we’ve had the Liar in Chief and his nauseating lies since 2008. And in all reality Bill Clinton lied his way through an 8-year presidency too. Killery Clinton …. Well she’s just another liar who surrounds herself with others of like amoral character.

    Like

  5. Monroe says:

    Obama is not yet endorsing Hillary because A) Obama doesnt plan to leave office. B) It might take the spotlight off of him, the Narcissist in Chief, or C) FLOTUS will run

    Liked by 2 people

  6. striket1977 says:

    Mr. Earnest could you please list her accomplishments?

    Liked by 1 person

  7. pbunyan says:

    I have to agree with the Joshmeister. Considering Obama’s foreign policy was (1) to alienate our traditional allies, (2) to coddle and empower communist dictators, (3) to encourage, enrich, and abet radical Islamists, and (4) to do anything else that would weaken and harm the United States, I would say that Hillary was extremely, fabulously, “effective” at achieving those ends.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. goodoldboy66 says:

    Unfortunately she will garner gender empathy from a vast many voters – including most women and all sissy-pants males. Based on raw #’s her gender identity momentum exceeds Kenya Diggit’s race + white guilt momentum. Near impossible line for the R candidate to walk – as mere disagreement will elicit shrill campaign and MSM charges of misogyny.

    Like

    • Monroe says:

      There is a rift in the feminist movement.

      On one side you have the NOW ilk who basically consider women to be a uterus with legs. Gloria Steinem is in that mix. The opposing group actually tried to take over NOW by winning state elections and shaping the message at the national level.Limited success.

      The other side is struggling with a name. Feminism is currently perceived as Femi-Nazi’s and turns off a lot of women. This group wants women to mentor women, find ways to decrease the pay gap though speaking up (in salary talks women tend to sell themselves cheap), showcasing women’s; role in history by saving historical statues that are slated to be replaced with those of men and basically empowering women. No yelling or whining.

      The NOW group are fem-bots and will go nuts over Hillary.

      The other group will be tempted but will likely vote for best candidate.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Monroe says:

      In 2008, the MSM was very misogynistic towards Hillary and Palin. I have a great summary video that will either anger you or make you puke.

      Now MSM will cry misogyny against Hillary at the drop of a hat, like they did with racism and obama. Do you believe that the MSM pushed to have Hillary give half of her KY delegates to Obama because KY is racist.Who cares. Racists are allowed their opinion and the right to cast their vote. Its not like Obama supporters weren’t racist.

      Like

    • hoosiergranny says:

      Hold on there just a moment. Most women? I disagree. Other than my 14 year old granddaughter (who is in the clutches of the evil public school system) I know of NO female voter who will be voting for Hill. Other than the liberal lambs to the slaughter, most women think she is a poor excuse for a strong woman. Hillary shouldn’t cry that Rand is too hard on her if she plans to be a major player on the international scene.

      Liked by 1 person

  9. czarowniczy says:

    In comparison to whom or what? Considering his list of foreign events successes her just not starting WW III is a plus.

    Like

  10. goodoldboy66 says:

    And when you consider that part of her job at foggy bottom was to elicit foreign donations known and underground for her 2016 run – to keep the WH in Dem hands, yes she was very effective/

    Like

  11. Judgy says:

    I enjoyed Greg Gutfeld’s take on how/ why the charmless Mrs. Clinton was featured only at the tail end of her own roll-out video: “They’re treating her like the shark in “Jaws”, where the impact matters more the less you see of them”.

    While I appreciate not having to be subjected to her grating voice, & bitter, brittle persona, I also hope they’ll eventually allow her enough rope to hang herself with. I think Earnest may be sticking w/ the ol’ “If you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything”.

    Yuk, she’s just SO unappealing, on SO many levels. I’d much rather vote for the mechanical shark! Or are they actually the very same thing?? 🙂

    Like

  12. lovely says:

    Mrs. Clinton where you when the call came and Christopher Stevens, Officer Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, and Tyrone Woods were brutally murdered?

    This should be the question that is perpetually put before Clinton every time she dares to pretend she is anything other than what she is.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Annie says:

      Or, how could you possibly look a deceased Navy Seal’s father, who is looking to you for answers concerning his sons’ death,and outright lie to the man. How could we as a nation possibly trust your judgment, when you intentionally lie to a grieving father?

      Liked by 3 people

  13. bob e says:

    grateful the clip was under a minute .. haven’t watched the
    phony show in years ..

    Like

  14. BertDilbert says:

    If she gets to the White house at least we do not have to pay extra for the SS to guard her secret servers

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s