Last week, on a Friday no less, Joe Biden executed a full usurpation of immigration law that had nothing to do with Presidential Executive Orders.
Vice-President Joe Biden announced the latest White House scheme, setting the table for a massive, economy-crushing influx of dependent people from Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador – yet few were paying attention.
In what may well be intended as the immigration knockout blow called “In-Country Refugee/Parole Program for Minors in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras With Parents Lawfully Present in the United States” (link).
When you drill down through the legalese presented in the summary announcement you find some interesting aspects to this new program:
[…] This program will allow certain parents who are lawfully present in the United States to request access to the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for their children still in one of these three countries.
“Lawfully present” is the current consideration within President Obama’s planned executive amnesty. In essence anyone covered by the executive order will be considered “lawfully present“.
The decree continues:
[…] International Organization for Migration, IOM, will arrange travel for the refugee(s) to the United States. The parent of the child will sign a promissory note agreeing to repay the cost of travel to the United States.
“A promissory note”? That angle skirts around Section 292 of the Immigration and Nationality Act prohibits representation of aliens “in immigration proceedings at government expense“.
What about welfare and social assistance programs?
[…] Parolees are not eligible for medical and other benefits upon arrival in the United States, but are eligible to attend school and/or apply for employment authorization. Individuals authorized parole under this program generally will be authorized parole for an initial period of two years and may request renewal.
Ah, but remember under “disparate impact” all social welfare service entities are NOT permitted to ask about legal residency status. So this outline, on it’s face, is disingenuous at best – and intentionally structured to skirt the law at worst.
It gets worse:
[…] Any child or parent admitted as a refugee will be included in the Latin America/Caribbean regional allocation of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program, which is 4,000 for FY 2015. If needed, there is some flexibility within the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program to accommodate a higher than anticipated number from Latin America in FY 2015.
Oh where have we heard this before?