SNL’s Take On The Future For White People….

Anyone remember back when SNL used to be funny…sometime back in 1976?  This latest skit contains a nice dose of psychological conditioning.  It’s promoting a message of “inevitability” … meant to psychologically condition white viewers to a sense of resignation and passivity.  We’re seeing more and more of these kinds of mind games in all genres of media and entertainment. I guess going on hikes, hugging dad, flying to the moon, all presented with customary self-effacing goofiness, are nothing more than corny SWPL (stuff white people like)?

Interesting…..when the woman says, “Let’s get at least 4 more [white] presidents”, isn’t she tacitly acknowledging that non-whites always vote for someone of their own race regardless of the candidate’s capabilities or experience?

What say you?

If you ask me, they all  look like a bunch of Obama campaign staffers partying after the last election…..blue mocking red all the way.   Oh, and the commenters over on YouTube didn’t think too much of the skit either.

Check out our friends over at Boomtown Bingo! The new slots sites 2018 have plenty of exciting features as well as generous promo codes which can get you brilliant bonuses.

Advertisements

About Ad rem

Millions of little gray cells wrapped in fur.
This entry was posted in A New America, Agitprop, As I Remember It, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Hollywood, Humor & Quizzes, Predictions, propaganda, Racism, Typical Prog Behavior. Bookmark the permalink.

187 Responses to SNL’s Take On The Future For White People….

  1. Play that at a Klan rally and gauge the reaction. Do they still have Klan rallies?

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Daniel says:

    Holy crap, that was among the most frightening things I’ve seen in a while.

    Like

  3. LetJusticePrevail" says:

    I quit watching SNL a long time ago. They’re obviously a part of the progressive propaganda campaign. They’re not even funny.

    Liked by 4 people

  4. Ian says:

    White people need to stop acting like their race is some trivial thing that has no bearing on anything important. People are not blank slates that can be anything in life, our temperaments, outlooks and behavioral tendencies are all have correlations to race. The accomplishments of white people and the type of societies built by white people are not mere randomness, they are a reflection of the qualities of the white race. Just look at societal changes that follow demographic changes (South Africa, anyone? How about Detroit?).

    A country like America needs to be run by white people, or it loses its essence. A polity run by Mexicans will be like Mexico, a polity run by blacks will be like Africa, etc. America is more racially diverse now than it ever was, but it’s a country in decline. The only thing holding it together is the white majority and the capital built up by the earlier whites. If whites want to live in a society that suits who they are, it needs to be one run by whites. As we’ve already seen with the Obama administration, our government, in the hands of blacks, uses its power to exercise hostility toward whites.

    It is not noble for whites to fade away, it is a needless renunciation of what centuries of hard work and ingenuity created. Our European ancestors toiled away and even risked their lives to give us all that we have. If we hand it over to another race, they won’t have the same sense of stewardship we do. They’ll take it for granted, because they have no connection to it. They’d just as soon tear it all down and remake it in their image, even if it’s worse than before. Forget any notion of a post-racial utopia, and face the reality of race: Different groups on average have different qualities, and those differences are reflected in the societies they inhabit. If you like the traditional America, only white people can preserve it.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Attorney says:

      The irony is that whites are now the least racist group on the US but are being savaged. They must really hate white kids. The messages in school and elsewhere are sick.

      Like

    • nyetneetot says:

      “…People are not blank slates that can be anything in life, our temperaments, outlooks and behavioral tendencies are all have correlations to race….”

      While it is true that not everyone is born into this world with the ability to become rocket scientists, behavior is not a condition of race. Behavior is the result of upbringing and environment. You’ve presented the same flawed argument Margaret Sanger used.

      Liked by 3 people

      • QuadGMoto says:

        Exactly. Skin color is often use to reinforce upbringing. (Example, “black culture”) That is why it appears that skin color matters. But that’s usually just a pathetic excuse used to defend evil cultural memes.

        Liked by 3 people

        • Vvv says:

          You should look at some twin or adoption studies to see how genetic characteristics of race persist even in the face of very strong cultural variables.

          Liked by 3 people

        • Coast says:

          It’s not genetics, but skin color does create an attitude and mindset, and that is what we call racism. This racism is very strong with people of color, and we all saw this with Obama having almost total support by blacks during the re-election, even though his policies have decimated the black community. I saw this with some of the most educated blacks in this country…it did not matter; they were going to vote for Obama regardless, policy did not matter, only skin color. No matter how good a white candidate is, they don’t stand a chance of obtaining the black vote when there is a black candidate. It’s that simple. As we have all seen, you can’t run a country like that. Due to upbringing (prime example is Obama and Holder) and poor education, most blacks have a severe lack of appreciation and understanding of America. I don’t want that running my country. It’s not about skin color in and of itself, but it’s a clear indication of what’s underneath. And I don’t see any positive progress in this area…the situation in Ferguson is an example.

          Liked by 3 people

        • Genetic studies that have delved into the behaviour of dog breeds and chimps continue to reflect that genetics determines most if not all behaviour.

          Like

          • nyetneetot says:

            Dogs and apes have traits. Behaviors are learnt.

            Like

            • Kitty Smith says:

              No, not all. Some behaviors are genetically-driven. For instance, a gene for violence has been identified, and it’s far more present in black males than males of other races. Some eating disorders, which were once thought to be strictly learned behaviors and matters of habit, may actually be driven by certain genetic markers for expression of auto-immune antibodies creating endocrine and other imbalances. The list goes on.

              I agree that one has to add fuel to the flame to get a good fire going, but the flame is there, awaiting a catalyst. But there’s a difference between that and the peer pressure of forcing a bone through the cartilage of one’s nose. There’s no genetic marker for nose-boning, tattooing, ear-gauging, penis-piercing, pants on the ground, etc. – strictly learned behaviors made desirable through peer pressure.

              Like

              • nyetneetot says:

                For instance, a gene for violence has been identified, …..

                And the discovery has been proven a failure every time they claim to have really truly discovered it this time. The gene for that doesn’t exist. Behavioral genetics is a money making fraud with experts that can drug you and your children up, or simply lock you way for public disagreement.

                Like

                • Kitty Smith says:

                  The debunking you speak of has been debunked.

                  Far more than paranoia about being drugged and locked away, one should be concerned about criminals being found not guilty because they have no control over their genetic dispositions. The next stop to visit their genetic disposition on could be your house or your daughter alone in a parking lot.

                  Further, you didn’t address anything I said about the genetic autoimmune disorders that do impact behaviors such as eating disorders. I take it you agree with that part?

                  Like

                • nyetneetot says:

                  I didn’t address anything that is considered to be spurious or fraudulent science. You can take that as a no.
                  I’m busy with other things or I would post links for you to ignore.

                  Like

        • Kitty Smith says:

          Horse puckey.

          Intellectual horsepower matters. It means everything in constructing a prosperous, successful society. Blacks don’t have the horsepower to do that, not as a group. And rare is the black individual who can govern effectively and without corruption. The fact that blacks define themselves by their skin color and are therefore identifiable as probably less intelligent by their skin color is their choice. Integration plus every extra benefit, opportunity, hand up and hand out, set aside, AA programs, excessive educational expenditures, the whole nine yards, was handed to them on a silver platter. Yet they can’t succeed. The reason they can’t succeed is because they’re too damn dumb to succeed in a white world. Comparatively, they are an evolutionary dead-end. They need us. We sure as hell don’t need them.

          Anybody who thinks blacks are equal to whites in terms of their racial differences in the areas that really matter like science and math is deluding himself. By and large, they innately lack the abstract thought and planning skills that are necessary for success in those disciplines.

          Liked by 1 person

          • QuadGMoto says:

            Wow… Just… wow…

            How can I possibly respond to a comment that’s more intellectually vacuous than the accusations it levels?

            SMH

            Like

            • Kitty Smith says:

              You already responded with a non-response.

              They’re not accusations. Other than an anecdote here or there that you could trot out, you have nothing to refute what I’ve said because it’s true, it’s always been true, and it always will be true.

              That you disagree on some very vague, undefined level simply indicates that you’ve swallowed the old boll about them being “just like us”. You’re indoctrinated. I used to be the same way, until my rational mind acknowledged patterns and observations that simply could not be ignored or reconciled, considering the amount of time and all the vast benefits and opportunities blacks have been GIVEN to assimilate.

              Tell, you what. You prove they’re assimilated now and everything with blacks is just hunky-dory. They’re a perfect fit for our society. Well, that may be a bridge too far. Tell you what. Just prove that they’re trying, really trying, to learn, become productive, peaceful and assimilate.

              Go for it.

              Liked by 1 person

            • Kitty Smith says:

              Question: What does “SMH” mean?

              Like

              • QuadGMoto says:

                You claim to be Smarter Than Them™. Figure it out.

                Like

              • Ian says:

                I believe it means “shaking my head,” and it’s meant to imply that the other person’s argument is so self-evidently invalid that only condescension is merited in response. This acronym is often used in place of an actual argument, because the user believes it’ll embarrass the other person into abandoning the line of discussion.

                Liked by 1 person

                • Kitty Smith says:

                  LOL! Thanks for the explanation. Since I quit caring about being called a “RACIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!” by delusional sheeple and apparatchik propagandists long, long ago, I sure as hell don’t care about “SMH”! That’s funny.

                  Maybe he was shaking his head in an effort to recall any – ANY – information to refute my statement? Ya’ think? 😉

                  Like

                • stella says:

                  No, I don’t.

                  Liked by 2 people

                • stella says:

                  Any time you insist on grouping everyone with the same color or similar color skin into a single category, that is racist by definition. Fine that you don’t care; that’s your decision. I think it’s makes more sense to judge people based upon their actions, rather than skin color. To group everyone by skin color makes as much sense as the progs who characterize conservative whites as red necks who are stupid and poorly educated.

                  Liked by 3 people

                • Ad rem says:

                  Kitty….
                  Since you’ve proven that you’re unable to express your ideas or opinions without using pejoratives, you comments are now being moderated.

                  Liked by 1 person

                • Serpentor says:

                  What I find interesting in this whole discussion is that your original comment contained nothing errant. You said behavior correlates to race. Then everyone assumes you meant race = behavior which of course affirms the consequent and attributes your valid argument into a false cause strawman. There are countless correlations to race for more reasons than we can come up with, but the correlations still exist. Further, there are quite a number of adventitious genes floating around causing legitimate “racial” correlations that common sense would say shouldn’t depend on race (and no one said it does, but the genes might just be along for the ride).

                  Like

      • Serpentor says:

        Interesting hypothesis nyetneetot. I’m curious, how do you square it with the three laws of behavior genetics?

        Liked by 1 person

        • QuadGMoto says:

          Every single person, I repeat, Every. Single. Person. is capable of holding different opinions, making different assumptions, holding a different worldview. (Not to say that they will, just that they can.) This is because of something unique to the human race: a mind.

          To claim that someone should believe <meme> because their skin is <color> is 100% pure, super concentrated racist bovine excrement.

          Liked by 1 person

        • nyetneetot says:

          “…how do you square it with the three laws of behavior genetics?”

          Why would I bother? Reported genetic linkages and associations for reading disability, sexual orientation, alcoholism, drug use, violence, paranoid schizophrenia, and hyperactivity have been more junk science to drive a socialist agenda. None of these claims had been replicated.

          Liked by 2 people

      • 7delta says:

        Ah, Margaret Sanger. She’s an interesting study and was everything the left accuses conservatives of being, while remarkably remaining one of Hillary’s heroes. She wasn’t overly impressed with the quality of the people involved in the KKK, but she shared their ideology. She made speeches to them and supported them. She thought the dysgenic people (poor, black, Hispanic, Native American and Catholics) should be segregated into designated places away from the better people, you know, like projects and ghettos. Abortion wasn’t exactly on her radar at the time because it wasn’t a safe or remotely legal option, but she believed in eugenics, mandatory sterilization and birth control among those populations to curb reproduction.

        I could go on, but my point is that her own writings are worth reading for insight into core progressive ideology and how those same beliefs live today as wolves in sheep’s clothing, which is a Fabian Society icon to represent their strategy and with whom Sanger was intimately connected.

        Sanger was, IMO, mentally unbalanced, not because of the actual women’s health issues she promoted, but because of what lay beneath that crusade and the venom that drove her. She remains emblematic of progressivism. By looking at her beliefs and strategies, we can see how her ideologies were morphed and disguised into what we see today. She was not a nice lady looking out for the folks.

        Liked by 2 people

      • swimologist says:

        Black are more disposed to anger easily and are sexually and violently impulsive.
        It’s in their genes. There is no other explanation for it. They rape, murder and steal
        no matter their environment.

        Like

      • Ian says:

        The genes that give one physical characteristics associated with race tend to correlate with certain other genes that affect behavior and temperament. I’m not saying one causes the other, I’m saying they correlate. The people with certain sets of genes also tend to carry other specific sets of genes. That is why we can say that certain racial groups have certain observable tendencies. On average (key phrase here), different groups are going to exhibit different characteristics.

        Liked by 2 people

        • QuadGMoto says:

          People with similar physical characters tend to associate with each other. Thus the saying, “birds of a feather flock together.” That association tends to have far more influence on what a person believes than anything else.

          Thus my point that race enforces upbringing, and nyetneetot’s point that studies cannot disentangle environment (social structures) from the mix.

          Like

        • nyetneetot says:

          Having two eyes and a nose does not correlate to robbing a bank. It’s 30 years of junk non-reproducible science that has made people very wealthy.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Ian says:

            It is not “junk science,” and I see very few people getting wealthy from speaking out about it. More often than not, they’re demonized because what they say has implications most people would rather not deal with. It feels so much nicer to believe that we can eliminate any differences if we just try hard enough. And when reality rears its ugly head, those same people don’t question their premises, they just assume there’s more work to be done.

            Just about any scientist who studies genes will tell you that different people groups have different genetic traits that affect their behavior. These groups evolved in different environments and adapted to different selection pressures. It’s absurd to think that race is only skin-deep. It’s also absurd to think that being realistic about group differences implies hatred or the desire to hurt others. People need to stop being afraid to discuss this issue. It’s very real, and we see the perils of ignoring it everywhere around us.

            Liked by 3 people

            • QuadGMoto says:

              It is junk science. That can be proven in only 5 words: second and third generation immigrants.

              Like

            • nyetneetot says:

              I’m sitting here attending a seminar completely unrelated to this topic, but I find myself getting pulled into a grade school playground argument over why blacks can’t help themselves being dull witted and criminals.

              Behavioral geneticist studies has become an entire industry. The repeated failures to replicate associations between genes and behavior have been ignored or suppressed.
              It’s one of the main drivers of social services Gene linkages and associations had been claimed for traits such as aggression, schizophrenia, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, male homosexuality, and dyslexia. Pharmaceutical sales exploded.

              Yet prior to all these discoveries in the last 30 years, giving a good old fashion whack to the butt kept our cities from burning down.

              Liked by 1 person

            • Kitty Smith says:

              So well said.

              One only need to look at the body count of all races of victims of black crime to understand how important the “conversation” is.

              People have got to stop kowtowing to PC lies, indoctrination and leftwing dogma and just speak the truth.

              Liked by 1 person

            • Serpentor says:

              The original response displayed the level of knowledge and understanding you were dealing with. Trying to educate here, it seems, is similar to spitting in the wind. 😉

              Like

            • What you say is so true Ian, I don’t care if you are in school, at work, in the military people of the same skin color seem to gravitate to one another. They started teaching our kids in schools and else were that whites treated blacks wrong for many years and that we owe them something. they have been teaching white kids that only whites can be prejudice so in any situation where blacks feel that they have been wronged it must be the whites fault. Even though black youths in urban areas seldom look for a job which has greatly contributed to the 25% unemployment rate for black males has been blamed on whites saying two things, That whites have not made jobs available in their areas and that whites won’t hire blacks like they will white youths. Whites need to ask themselves a couple of questions and that is why does it seem that young black males seem to be so much more prejudice then say blacks 60 and above. people in their 60s remember whites only drinking fountains and whites only bathrooms but yet it seems that blacks 30 and under are the most prejudice. On numerous occasions I have seen on talk shows blacks that say [ we have come a long way since the civil rights movement of the 60s but we still have a long way to go ] Not one time have I seen a host ask them what exactly do you mean. I have ask black people I know what they mean, I know what they mean, no consequence’s for their actions. I’m sure that when it all comes to a head that there will be enough whites to take care of things even for the people that are to dumb or to scared to help. I know there are people out there that is not scared or dumb its just that you have been brain washed and have not been taught to be able to think for yourselves. You guys need to start looking at things for what they are and use your heads because make no mistake about it the democrats have been working on this for many years and Obuma for them is the iceing on the cake. I hope and pray everyday that it doesn’t happen but I believe its just a matter of time. Be ready I am

              Like

          • Kitty Smith says:

            Comment removed

            Like

            • stella says:

              Okay, where’s the links to the studies that prove this?

              Like

              • Ok stella go to the FBI crime statistic’s for the last years available. 3% of our population, Black males from the ages 15 to 34. 55% of robbery 49% of murders 36% of violent Assaults and 32% of rapes. We have been bussing blacks since 1970 yet by the education dept own statistic’s 17 year old blacks are 4 years academically behind white students. You tell me why this is because the FBI nor the ed dept tells us why they just tell us what they found out when they did their statistic’s. I suppose from your point of view the statistic’s that these different dept’s come up with are racist. There are many more statistic’s you could look up for a lot more agency’s and they all point in the same direction. I almost forgot the most important the ones that all racist over look it all whitey fault. You know who I would like to kill? Those greedy SOBs that brought the slaves here in the first place. Those poor ol black people in Africa with nothing to eat and no medicine where do you think they would rather live. I would trade the ones there for the ones here and would help pay the trip.

                Like

                • stella says:

                  I don’t disagree with anything you posted, except: what proof is there that this is a result of genetics, rather than a result of environment, particularly the Great Society?

                  Liked by 1 person

                • stella says:

                  Let’s say that everything you believe to be true is true. I know that there are differences in intelligence over a broad group of people, depending on race. In fact, I posted about it here. There’s nothing wrong with saying what is true.

                  https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2013/08/09/why-cant-we-talk-about-iq/

                  What I object to is applying this to every single individual of a racial group, and I question the reason why. Why is it important to denigrate an entire race based upon the actions of individuals? Even if all of the members of a particular race aren’t as intelligent as other races, does that mean that they can make no positive contribution to society, or that they are all potential criminals?

                  If an individual commits crimes, I want that person to be punished. I don’t care about his skin color. Every human being of average intelligence – unless they have a psychological or mental condition, such as severe retardation – knows the difference between right and wrong. They know it is wrong to steal, or kill.

                  Most people do not want crime in their neighborhoods, regardless of their race. They don’t want young punks roaming the streets blasting loud music, defacing buildings, robbing people, or beating them up for the fun of it. They don’t want drug dealers on the corner, or gang wars and drive-by shootings. They want their kids to be able to safely walk to school, or play at the local park.

                  Liked by 1 person

                • QuadGMoto says:

                  It seems to me that even those with very low IQs can understand basic morality—that it’s wrong to hurt people and take their stuff. I certainly haven’t heard of people with Down Syndrome being a risk group for criminal activity. This is why I don’t buy the IQ based arguments.

                  Like

            • Serpentor says:

              What I find most disheartening was the notion that understanding genetics was some sort of left-wing thought when nothing could be further from the truth.

              And if anyone reading this is curious about “links” that “prove” or demonstrate, pick up some behavior genetics textbooks, or read a more down to earth writing like Blank Slate… which is not completely lost on me that Ian used those two words in his original comment. If you start digging around the genetics literature, you’ll find that there was pretty much nothing controversial posted here (that I read anyway, but I didn’t read all the comments)

              Like

    • Sentient says:

      What have white people ever given the world – other than…

      the Magna Carta
      constitutional law
      representative democracy
      the printing press
      government of limited and enumerated powers
      global exploration and trade
      the discovery of electricity
      the battery
      the generator
      the steam engine
      the telegraph
      the telephone
      the phonograph
      radio transmission and reception
      the light bulb
      alternating current
      the internal combustion engine
      oil production and refining
      the dirigible
      the train
      the automobile
      assembly line mass production
      mechanized agriculture
      fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides
      germ theory
      disinfectants
      vaccines
      antibiotics
      surgery
      the airplane
      radar
      sonar
      television
      the capacitor
      the transistor
      the computer
      lasers
      rocketry
      the green revolution
      space travel and exploration
      geosynchronous satellites.
      integrated circuitry
      the internet
      virtually all software
      virtually all social media

      Liked by 3 people

    • waynestrick says:

      FBI Crime statistics use latinos and muzzies to taint the White crime numbers, what a real drag that is.

      Like

    • Not specifically to you…. to the conversation of Nature vs. Nurture.
      The foxes with ‘cuter’ features were also the ones with the gentler natures.
      http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/print/2011/03/taming-wild-animals/ratliff-text

      Like

    • CoffeeBreak says:

      Ian, I thank you for bringing about this discussion. I read it earlier and wasn’t sure if I wanted to respond. I’ve enjoyed reading the replies to your post- I think all I really want to say is to you and Kitty Smith: Don’t lose hope. I interact with young blacks and Hispanics every day that have shunned the ways of their old communities. In all cases, it started with leaving those areas. I do notice a difference in blacks that move to this country and blacks that were raised here. The immigrants are eager to hit the ground running and in many cases, realize their goals of higher education and solid assets in the first generation. Blacks that have been subjected to race hustlers for several generations have been spoon fed untruths and perpetually placated with new/better/more freebies for the purposes of maintaining an instant army when masters call. I am encouraged by those that break away and are not afraid of working two and three part time jobs. Especially when they are also pursuing their GED’s or college degrees. Again, I thank you for not being afraid to share your thoughts and look forward to continuing to read your and Kitty’s comments in the future on this site! 🙂

      Liked by 3 people

  5. So I guess America will basically be Mexico and South Africa in 60+ years? Great plan, I wonder how Israel will fair in that world.

    Like

    • Moishe Pipik says:

      Both China and India support Israel. They both have the same “Muslim” problem that the U.S. and Europe have, and they see Israel as an ally.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Egypt and Jordan, too, see Israel as an ally. Correctly, I believe.

        Also, @ John Galt, above, do you have any stats on IQs of Sephardic Jews? Especially the Spanish Jews? Also, what about the Chinese Jews? They must be geniuses!

        Like

    • John Galt says:

      Mexicans calling the shots in USA by 2050 and doing yard work and washing dishes for the Chinese by 2100.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Kev says:

      It won’t take that long.

      Like

    • Kitty Smith says:

      Are there enough Asian and Jewish doctors, engineers and research scientists to keep it altogether without YT? Latinos are pretty good at mechanical devices, but not electronic and structural engineering. Blacks, fuhgeddaboutit. So who will the new U.S. order turn to when the infrastructure falls apart?

      Like

  6. stella says:

    America needs to be run by God-fearing conservatives, no matter what the color of their skin, or their sex. If you are truly worried about the downfall of whites, somebody had better start having babies.

    Liked by 7 people

    • “…somebody had better start having babies.”

      Hey, Eleanor !
      .
      On second thought,

      Never mind !
      😈

      Liked by 2 people

    • yankeeintx says:

      That is a huge and important statement to make. It leads to conservatives accepting personal responsibility and limiting our family size to what we can afford. With an Irish Catholic Dad, we had more cousins than we could count. Then along came birth control and even Catholics were having smaller families. Many in my generation remember the struggles of being part of a large family and didn’t want the burden of feeding, clothing, and educating a large family. Also add in that woman were joining the work force, and there weren’t as many stay-at-home Moms. Now we have other races and ethnicities popping out babies as fast as they can, and we are struggling to support their families when they fail to do so, and so the burden we were trying to avoid is still ours.

      Liked by 7 people

      • 7delta says:

        Now we have other races and ethnicities popping out babies as fast as they can, and we are struggling to support their families when they fail to do so, and so the burden we were trying to avoid is still ours.

        Just think that bears repeating.

        Like

      • Tkim says:

        Speaking of big families, growing up in a working class neighborhood in the 1960’s, the Dads mostly worked in the still mill and the Moms were at home. Most families had four kids minimum and while we were fed three times a day, snacks and treats were reserved mostly for holidays.
        We used to collect cans and bottles to buy Popsicles, candy, or luxury of luxuries, split a McDonald’s burger. (Most of our protein at home came from beans or fish from a generous, retired neighbor with a rowboat).

        We even went to Vacation Bible School for the cookie and kool-aid they served, heathens that we were.

        But I remember the 60’s were when the great push for social programs in the city began. And I sat almost drooling watching the inner city kids on tv lining up for their free box lunches. I wondered why only kids in the city got lunches and not us.

        It didn’t make sense, or seem fair, but it made me want to find even more ways to make money. And it made me darned resourceful. Later, even as a college student, I could go a whole day on a can of soup and a sandwich. You figure things out for yourself when you’re not expecting a free lunch. In every darn respect.

        Liked by 5 people

        • yankeeintx says:

          My Aunt was left with 9 kids when her husband walked out on them. They received gov’t food in the form of beans, rice, pasta, and canned meats. Family members helped as much as we could, and the church helped too. They did not receive an EBT card so they could go buy twinkies, chips and soda.

          Like

        • Kitty Smith says:

          Great post.

          Like

      • waynestrick says:

        Some of my White neighbors 40 years ago had 12 people in a 3 bedroom ranch. Whew!

        Like

      • So, as a friend said years ago at the height of the Zero Population Growth movement, when he was queried about the fact that his wife was pregnant, “We’re pushing out the bad guys!”

        Liked by 1 person

  7. McGuffin says:

    Blacks should be pissed they’re getting passed over by “Mexicans”. But on the bright side, blacks will be hatin’ Mexicans in the future instead of whitey. Victims of knock out game? Whites won’t have to worry.

    Like

    • stella says:

      At least a third of Mexicans ARE white (maybe more). Same for other Hispanics.

      Liked by 2 people

    • elvischupacabra says:

      Whole areas of South Central and west Los Angeles are being “ethnically cleansed” of African Americans by Mexicans. Nobody wants to mention that.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Mist'ears Mom says:

        There are not many blonde blue eyed Mexicans/Cubans, there are a few but rare. The majority are black/dark haired brown/dark eyed. Just spend some time down in So. San Diego. Take a look at any classroom in this area and there are rarely any blonde/blue etc. kids. Maybe 1 in 30 if any. I’ve live there I know. Caucasian’s are the minority.
        Brown/black, dark skin/hair are dominate genes. It is only a matter of time before white/blonde/blue etc. is genetically replaced with the abundance of non-whites procreating or those with the dominate genes mixing with people with recessive gene traits.

        http://www.buzzle.com/articles/dominant-and-recessive-traits-in-humans.html

        You have got to know what is coming when half the billboards on the freeways are in Spanish. I’m not kidding, So. CAL is a cesspool and only getting worse.
        I tend to enjoy SNL and laugh out loud at some of their stuff because I think they poke fun at everybody-all sides, nobody is immune. Really it is a parody meant to make fun of the reality of this phenomenon that is happening although it wasn’t that funny IMO.

        Like

        • Kitty Smith says:

          It seemed to me that what SNL was really doing was making fun of people (whites) who have pointed to the trend with trepidation.

          Like

  8. waynestrick says:

    The Saint Louis County leader was black, but he was beat in the primary by a White…hence all of the Ferguson gnashing of teeth. A lot of the anger is the animosity shown by black power slipping not to mention the next President will be White.

    Like

  9. czarowniczy says:

    Wow, spooky (NO PUN INTENDED) but I was thinking exactly this same thing last night and was going to put it into a thread today. Either The Force is telling us to wake up, the programming’s becoming that obvious or someone’s finally brave enough to admit to wasting a small portion of irretrievable lifetime on SNL.
    We’ve talked before about the sneaky Al Bundyfication of the white male in advertising and the ‘entertainment’ media. He’s was originally made to look like a total idiot when paired with any female and has evolved into an idiot when paired with any person not white, male or female. The white male as comic/idiot foil to black male seems to be a far more common thing now. Don’t know if you watch the Cox commercials where Randy (the white guy) is a total idiot compared to his black neighbor, any female portrayed as less of a total idiot (at least the black neighbor isn’t squirting him with a hose any more). If you watch the more moderate commercials with white males/black males interacting, especially ones where they’re interacting (upscale fast food restaurant, football parties at a home) at the very best they’re all equally happy and cheering and the black guy(s) is/are NEVER seen wearing the Jets jersey.
    There’s no doubt about what’s going on, the progressives believe that the white males (and to a small extent the white females – but only due to perfidious white male pressure) are still the main reason that the black males have not jetted to success (rare sentence where you’ll see ‘Jet’ and ‘success’ together without some pejorative adjective). The media is trying to program the public into believing that, as it did with women, the white male oppressive cabal is the reason, we’re professional oppressors.
    Y’all go and count the racial couples in commercials and see how many white males are paired with black females, how many black males are paired with white females and how many brownish persons of indeterminate lineage are shown. Big ‘commercial’ market there for persons who are dark enough with European-enough features to be in commercials for companies who want to appear to be rainbow-enough but still have vague fears about upsetting their maybe not as diverse-thinking public. A tip-of-the-hat to what advertising folks know that progressives won’t admit – discrimination in some degree resides in every ethnic/racial group.
    Don’t sweat the commercial programming, so to speak, stats are showing that the Caucasian group is not-breeding itself into obsolescence, every racial group except black and white (irony there) in the US is increasing and the trend is continuing. Celebs in Hollyork have created a free trade in adopting designer accessory African children while thousands of children in Eastern Europe and even at home (if you want to be caught buying domestic) need homes – it’s not as if the Mexican nannies who’ll raise them would care if they were black or white.
    Let’s see how far the reprogramming of the urban residents into white guilt and white self-loathing will go until there’;s a breaking point. How far will it go before no white single or couple will feel safe walking down the deserted street late at night in an American major city – too many as it is will blame their mugging on how society has forced this ‘were it not for historical prejudice and oppression I’d be a Rhodes Scholar’ mugger’s being denied a ‘chance’ due to his ethnicity. Let’s see how long it will take for the New York TV moguls to make Django Unchained a primetime series, updated and set in some generic modern urban city. Sort of makes you long for the days when the worst thing on TV was an overplayed Archie Bunker and Randy getting squirted with a hose.

    Liked by 3 people

    • 7delta says:

      Have you seen the energy commercial that talks about the across-the-board support of conservatives (an older white woman) a liberal (young attractive male with darker skin) and an independent (pretty young blonde woman)? Some intentional stereotyping there to subtly influence how the viewer categorizes political persuasions? That’s what jumped out at me. So, yeah, I do think there’s war for your mind going on and it’s being promoted visually as well as verbally. Just nudging people along…

      Like

      • czarowniczy says:

        Nope, in this area it’s a given that all one has to do is publicly bow to the oil and gas production industries and that group of Louisiana ‘owners’ is appeased. Local Senator’s race shows a lot of closeups of the candidates with a few commercials having views of any races other than white so as to take a middle ground. It’s generally thought that certain groups will vote for whomever will give them a preprinted – whoops – ‘example’ ballot and that 3-piecer chicken box.

        Liked by 1 person

    • 7delta says:

      The media is trying to program the public into believing that, as it did with women, the white male oppressive cabal is the reason, we’re professional oppressors.

      Just wanted to add that yes, there has been a concerted effort over the last 3 to 4 decades to neuter the male, of all skin hues, but the most blatant examples target the white male. The black male was hit by a different strategy to remove him from his natural role in the family and to capitalize on his natural instincts by directing his male energy into destructive arenas. Look how black men are usually portrayed, the distortion of what is considered success, and how those behaviors are reinforced. The white guy has been feminized, pitted against women and minorities, and rendered a punch line to silence him and tamp down his natural instincts. The military has been about the only place left where those instincts were acceptable, but that’s now being eroded.

      Women are considered more controllable by manipulating their emotions. “It’s for the children.” However, women should not be sold short just because their nature is generally softer and more nurturing. Never ever underestimate an angry woman. Women are unpredictable forces of nature that can lift cars off their young, roll up their sleeves and do almost any job a man can do to survive and to protect her young, leave a path of destruction Katrina could only dream about, if provoked, and will not abate until the enemy lays broken at her feet. Social psychologists know this and fear her unpredictably and determination, because she can’t be attacked or destroyed in the same way a man can be. Gotta love her.

      And, men have to support her by remembering who they are and by refusing to back down or away from their natural roles. She has to reconnect with his role and a shared partnership that defies the promulgated narratives. Gotta love him too. It’s a pretty effective arrangement when both male and female get on the same team, which is why it must be destroyed.

      Liked by 3 people

      • 7delta says:

        Before welfare (AFDC), as you noted, the marriage and births to unwed mothers rates among blacks were about the same as whites. The system made marriage and stability a disadvantage. It discouraged commitment and rewarded women having multiple children by multiple men. Men quickly became liabilities and were relegated to sperm donors.

        Family structure became female oriented. Male role models in the home were removed. Women resented the absence of the fathers, switched partners frequently, often at the expense of the children, as they tried to find something they gave away without knowing that would be the price of ‘free’. They ‘married’ the government and look to it to fulfil the male’s role, but aren’t satisfied, because as good as checks sound, it doesn’t replace the intimacy of an intact family. They’re angry at men for the unhappiness they consented to as payment for something for nothing. Children are raised with a whole lot of dysfunction and misdirected anger.

        Males grow up hating the fathers who ‘abandoned’ them, angry with their mothers for hating their fathers and confused about who he is. Relationships with women are adversarial, fall apart quickly, each blaming the other. Men are naturally more physical and more aggressive and when those instincts are denied healthy expression, as they were intended, to protect and provide for families and safe communities, it gets redirected. They turn to other ways to prove their manhood, in the ‘hood, on the street and in how many baby mamas they rack up. It’s encouraged by media, entertainment and those who benefit. They’re angry at the world and with themselves, but with no self awareness. The BGI and progressives can’t let that happen. Deflect blame and stoke as much emotion as possible to keep anyone from saying, “Hey, wait a minute…” Nearly all, if not all, the ‘help’ programs are wolves in sheep’s clothing, designed to be detrimental in the long run. They know they cannot control independent people.

        I say ‘hit’, because just as there has been a strategy to neuter the white male, there’s one to neuter the black male too. It’s not about race. It’s just different social-psychological strategies, tailored demographically, to produce the same outcome…remove or render impotent the threat of principled committed males with something valuable to protect. White men are making big mistakes too by thinking irresponsibility is what they want.

        It’s a planned long-term hit, where the rewards come in installment payments to the instigators. Manipulate people to think whatever benefits the strategy. Create dependency. Divide and conquer. Create chaos. Males warring with the wrong enemy for the wrong reasons or too scared to do anything or too indifferent to get their heads out of the sand. Women looking to Sugar Daddy Feddy to keep her safe and in food stamps or too overwhelmed with trying to meet the expectations of work and family she’s accepted as necessary for her self worth that she’s too exhausted and too confused to figure out why things are falling apart and just get harder everyday, and with every other whoever v. whatever playing non-stop on the news, uniting people who should be natural allies, with shared beliefs and goals, to put out the fires the hits sparked is reduced, if not eliminated. The ones who ordered the hit, then get to re-forge the world in their own image. Out of chaos comes order.

        I understand what you’re saying and I agree. We’re at a point now where it’s just fine with a lot of people, but it doesn’t change the decades long policies and indoctrination designed to create this dysfunction. It is strategy, because there’s nothing logical, compassionate or healthy about it. It’s a hit that was taken out on all of us long ago. And yes, absolutely we can all choose to not be manipulated, but first we have to recognize the strategy exists and that it’s never been in our best interest, but since this has been going on longer than most of us have been alive, it’s not an easy task to get people to carefully reevaluate their world view.

        Your points are well taken.

        Liked by 2 people

  10. west1890 says:

    We can’t talk about this because it’s ‘politically incorrect’, but it can’t be ignored.
    http://www.rense.com/general79/dut.htm

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Vvv says:

    Further economic downturns combined with further decentralization of everything and the coming of the second machine age will foment the balkanization of many large political boundary units, and the USA will not be immune. Whites will have little choice but to separate themselves and will do so effectively in my opinion.

    We are already seeing this in scotland, the six californias, the catalan, northern colorado, etc etc.

    I have faith that whites are resourceful enough, brave enough, and strong enough to shake off this PC and media induced ideas like above and take up proudly once again the banner of their ethnicity before it is too late.

    Like

    • QuadGMoto says:

      ^^^ That’s a nice example of racism right there.

      Skin color has nothing to do with knowledge, logic, reasoning, truth, or wisdom. Those are all attributes of the mind that can be learned by any member of the human race.

      Liked by 1 person

      • John Galt says:

        False. IQ is an inherited, genetic characteristic and there are well documented disparities of demographic median IQ which correlates highly with race.

        Liked by 5 people

      • Vvv says:

        Wow, don’t choke on those blue pills, dude. How can you seriously believe that when you look around with your eyes. It is more like race realism than racism. I am not saying whites are inherently superior or better , just that whites and blacks are different by nature and the current PC culture, media, government programs have painted whites in this country into a corner that sooner or later they will either cordon off for themselves or come out swinging.

        Liked by 3 people

        • QuadGMoto says:

          I recognize that some people use differences in skin color as a basis for creating division and for making “you should believe <idea> because your skin is <color>” claims. But such reasoning is both logically fallacious and morally evil. Adopting the exact same tactic in response is no better. “It’s not wrong when we do it” is equally irrational and evil.

          Like

          • Vvv says:

            there are natural divisions in genetic heritages that are precursors the development of belief systems by different groups. It is not a matter of enforced ideas or dogmas.

            Liked by 2 people

            • QuadGMoto says:

              In other words, your claim is that genetics (race) trumps truth and logic.

              Or yet another way, “people believe <idea> because of their skin color.”

              You have made yourself very clear, as have I.

              Like

              • Vvv says:

                more like somewhat homogenous and genetically similar cultures(scottish, tutsi, bantu, finnish) develop their respective different belief systems because of 1) their genetic makeup and then 2)how having a group of those similar genetic makeups all together interacts.

                Like

                • QuadGMoto says:

                  And the fact that they live in the same geographical areas which limits the pool of ideas they have access to plays no role whatsoever?

                  Seriously?!? Are you sure you’re not just trolling?

                  Like

                • Vvv says:

                  So, placing 1 million tutsis in scotland and removing th scots, the tutsis would have come up with all of those ideas? Is that what you are saying?

                  This is my point as a thought experiment. Two identical 1000 square mile islands. On one place 1000 Finns, on the other place 1000 tutsis. Suppose these people are placed at a very young age with no memory of their culture and a portion of them survived somehow.

                  Wait some period of time for at least a few generations to pass. Examine the culture and order that has sprung up on each island.

                  I am saying that if this experiment were repeated, often the Finns would develop a similar culture as would the tutsis, or at least that the various iterations of each respective cultures development would be more similar to their other iterations than to the other groups.

                  Like

  12. Sassy1 says:

    Who ARE these people? Such foolishness. In America, the color of your skin never used to matter. Shows how successful the community organizer-in-chief has been. It does seem to me that the further we go from our Christian roots, the farther down we go as a nation. I don’t believe it’s coincidence.

    Liked by 2 people

  13. Dean says:

    Have you ever noticed in TV commercials (more influential than SNL IMO) the blacks are the helpful, intelligence folks while the whites are the uneducated dopes and buffoons?

    Liked by 3 people

  14. lovemygirl says:

    I still recall Eddie Murphy disguised as a white in the SNL skit ‘White Like Me’. Is that the time frame SNL was marginally funny? I haven’t watched it in years, or maybe decades would be more correct.

    https://screen.yahoo.com/white-000000112.html

    Like

    • justice099 says:

      I thought that skit was funny because he was clearly poking fun at the conspiracy theory of ‘white privilege.” The difference between his skit and this one is that Eddie made it so outrageous that it actually made fun of people that believed this.

      In the above example, they are simply making fun of white people.

      Liked by 1 person

  15. elvischupacabra says:

    It’s been so long since I watched SNL, that my frame of reference is John Belushi as a samurai and “The Killer Bees” skits.

    American network television and a lot of cable is “Manhattan-New York-centric” which is NOT typically “American”. Most New Yorkers have never seen a cow, a chicken or stream with running water. Most Americans have never ridden the subway to work, been to a Broadway show or used a cab for primary transportation.

    No. We are NOT all New Yorkers, nor do we want to be.

    Liked by 2 people

    • yankeeintx says:

      Taking my DH from Texas through New York was an experience. He had never been east of the Mississippi, so it was a shock to him. We stopped so he could take a picture of a tobacco plant in VA, and he was surprised to learn you can’t pump your own gas in NJ, but NYC blew him away. He just kept repeating “how can people live this way?”.

      Like

      • John Galt says:

        “He just kept repeating “how can people live this way?”.

        I had the identical reaction. I wandered around repeating “Why don’t these people leave?”

        Like

        • yankeeintx says:

          He thought the traffic was bad because too many people live too close together. I explained that the traffic were people coming and going from NYC, most of the people in NYC don’t have cars. He went back to mumbling “how can people live this way!” It was cute that when we got lost in Queens, he asked if we could stop by the Statue of Liberty. I just rolled my eyes.

          Liked by 1 person

  16. carterzest says:

    I had the misfortune to watch a good portion of this episode when it aired. They are finally starting to dis o’Bola more often, but, it is so blatantly obvious that they still love and support him unconditionally… really sad.
    this is the one where they dis o’Bola on 60 minutes
    http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/obama-60-minutes-cold-open/2816864

    http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live

    After the future of white people skit, I had to turn it off.

    Like

  17. skeptiktank says:

    No, I do not remember when SNL was funny. I do remember when they had people convinced they were funny.

    Like

  18. elvischupacabra says:

    I got two e-mails asking me how I write Øbama with the NO sign as the first letter.

    Simple: instead of a capital-O, hold down the ALT key and (with NUM LOCK “on”) use the number pad to type in 0216. ALT + 0216. Hehehehehehehe…. 😆

    On other boards, it drives Lefties crazy!!!!!11

    Liked by 3 people

  19. QuadGMoto says:

    Has the Treehouse been invaded by leftist trolls? Or are these actually conservatives proving the left’s accusations that the right is racist?

    Like

    • Taking one side of Nature vs. Nurture rather than the other side isn’t racist.

      The foxes with ‘cuter’ features were also the ones with the gentler natures. The mother’s disposition did not make the ‘cub’ behave like her.

      http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/print/2011/03/taming-wild-animals/ratliff-text

      Like

      • Vvv says:

        Quadgmoto, can you at least admit that there are physical genetically influenced differences between races?

        I can totally understand the moral slope of understanding genetic behavioral or intelligence differences. It is quite scary.

        Keep in mind, I am not making any qualitative arguments about genetic differences, just that they are quantitavely real. The quality argument is where the racism comes in.

        Like

        • QuadGMoto says:

          Oh for crying out loud! Can you be any more blatantly racist?

          Concepts, ideas, and morality are wholly non-physical and obviously learned from those around us as we grow up. You are committing a category error by equating physical with non-physical. Are you also planning to start arguing about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin? (A well known example of that category error.)

          Like

          • Vvv says:

            So are you saying you admit the physical differences in races or not?

            Like

          • stella says:

            Twin studies show that people with identical or very similar genetic makeups are very much the same in personality, preferences in food, whether they smoke or not, etc. This is a comparison of two people with almost identical genetic makeup. It does not mean that such information can be extrapolated to included an entire race, the members of which do not have identical genetic makeups.

            Liked by 1 person

            • 7delta says:

              I think there’s a case to be made for both nature and nurture, but I don’t think any particular negative or positive trait is so inherent in any specific group that it’s set in stone. Smart people can be corrupted and not-so-bright people can be some of the most good, honest, common-sense-smart people you’ll find. IQ is not necessarily the determining factor about beliefs or behavior, but generations of being taught you’re an oppressed victim, you ought to angry about it, and somebody else has to pay for it, certainly has an impact.

              Liked by 1 person

    • If you play the left’s game by the left’s rules, you’re going to lose every time. Let them call us racist: then we’ll call them heathen. Neither insult should matter, as both are artifacts of a value system not shared by the other side. Buying into the opponents values, however, gives them an unwarranted leverage over you.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Ian says:

      On the contrary. I’m a hardcore conservative. The way I see it, conservatism is ultimately the pursuit of optimal results by applying our knowledge of reality. If the objective evidence tells us that there are differences between the races, then we need to be realistic about that if we’re ever to find the best solutions to our problems.

      The left, on the other hand, believes that holding socially acceptable views is most important. If there appear to be differences between the races, we have to ignore them or claim they’re just an illusion. It may not be true, but it makes us feel like good people, doggone it. It makes us feel like the power is in our hands, because acknowledging a lack of control is too difficult.

      But what do we get when we falsely presume equality? We see differing rates of criminality, differing rates of academic achievement, etc. But instead of acknowledging any genetic component, we assume that some malign force is preventing the equality we should see. The left will blame it on evil whites, and the “respectable right” (those conservatives who are more scared of leftist scorn today than societal decay tomorrow) will blame a “culture” that doesn’t seem to change no matter how hard we try to change it. In the end, the problems persist, because no one wants to acknowledge the elephant in the room: racial differences in intelligence and behavior.

      I know most white people live in fear of being called a “racist.” I used to be one of those people too. But I couldn’t ignore what my eyes were telling me. People are simply different, and all the good feelings in the world aren’t going to change that fact. Don’t buy into this paradigm that an idea is off-limits if it could be labeled “racist.” Just examine whether something is true or untrue. If we’re ever to achieve optimal good for all people of all races, we have to look at things objectively. If someone wants to call me a “racist,” I don’t care. I’m not motivated by hatred, but by a desire to see good to the good and bad to the bad. Don’t let the left dictate the terms on which ideas can be discussed, because they wont leave you any path to the truth.

      Liked by 1 person

      • stella says:

        How do you explain the fact that most black people are partly, even up to 50% white or other races? Based on your beliefs, how does the white part affect what they are and do? There is Obama, for instance. He is half white, and half African. Both of his parents were intelligent people.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Ian says:

          You are familiar with the concept of the bell curve, right? If you plot the aptitude levels of a group on an axis, the trend line will form the shape of a bell, meaning most members of the group will fall somewhere in the middle. When you compare groups, the center of the bell curve usually falls in a different spot on the x-axis. If you keep the composition of the sample fairly stable, the mean of the bell curve will stay in about the same area. In other words, a population of whites breeding only with whites or a population of blacks breeding only with blacks probably won’t see their bell curve change much over time, or it will happen slowly depending on selection pressures.

          However, if you have racial mixing, the mean of that mixed group will trend toward a spot between the means of the two separate groups. That’s one reason why black Americans, with their white admixture, have higher IQ’s on average than black Africans, but lower IQ’s on average than white Americans. When it comes to IQ, black and white Americans are different types of people in terms of their average capabilities.

          The keyword there, just so there’s no mistake, is “average.” Obviously not every white person is more intelligent than every black person, but when you view groups in the aggregate, the differences become clear. These differences do a lot to explain why whites generally live better than blacks.

          Like

          • stella says:

            So what do you think should be done with all of these inferior beings?

            Liked by 1 person

          • stella says:

            Sorry for the sarcasm, but I really would like to know what you think should be done. You DO know that Asians have higher I.Q.’s on average than European whites. Perhaps we whites should be segregated, or regulated in some way. The point is, each individual must be judged based upon their particular characteristics.

            Liked by 1 person

            • Ian says:

              Yes, I am certainly aware that Asian IQ’s are higher. I’d also note that you’re the one introducing language like “inferior beings,” not me. Nor have I ever suggested that individuals shouldn’t be treated fairly. I’m trying to talk in good faith here, so I’d appreciate it if you didn’t try to paint me as some stereotype.

              I think that when you get to the heart of the matter, a racially diverse society doesn’t work, because A) people are different and B) people are tribal by nature. When you have too much diversity, people are naturally going to gravitate toward their own groups, and the society will be divided along those lines. You may think it shouldn’t be that way, but that’s the way it is.

              That’s why I think people should strive to create separate societies, each of which is united by a common heritage, of which race will likely be the biggest factor. A common heritage bonds people like no government can. It unites them around the genetic commonalities that their culture is an outgrowth of. It also gives people historical context for their own existence. In other words, it tells them who they are. That’s why you see many American blacks who feel no connection to the Founding Fathers. White Americans feel a common bond with them due to shared European heritage, but blacks look at them as a bunch of dead white guys who owned their ancestors as slaves. In fact, many American blacks feel that Africa is their spiritual homeland, and have more loyalty to African blacks than white Americans. I think many whites feel a spiritual connection to Europe the same way, even if they don’t realize it.

              100% homogeneity isn’t necessarily attainable, but a healthy society needs an established majority whose predominance is understood and accepted by all, preferably one of at least 90%. Different types of people have different needs from their society, and those needs are best met by people who think and act like them. We wouldn’t see incidents like the one in Ferguson, or the shakedown artists of the BGI if we didn’t have this diverse society where everyone wanted their group to be on top. In a society run by whites for whites, white people wouldn’t be blamed for the failings of other races. In a society run by blacks for blacks, none of them would ever have to suspect that the law discriminates against them. In a society that represents self-determination for a people, they can do things their way and not be constantly agonizing over whether something is fair to every single group.

              I don’t hate people of other races. In fact, there are many I love and respect. I’m just realistic about the fact that people groups are different, and on a large scale, those differences matter. A lot of whites are still afraid to “go there,” but once you get past those initial hesitant feelings, everything starts to make a lot more sense. It’s like being freed from intellectual chains.

              Like

    • Sharon says:

      We have observed over the years that some racialists can’t help outing themselves when given half a chance. Sometimes all it takes are the words white and black being used in the same post, even paragraphs apart.

      Liked by 3 people

  20. ZurichMike says:

    Even in its supposedly funny days, there was always an element of forced laughter — as if you had to prove your liberalism by laughing at things that weren’t funny, but you didn’t want to appear as if you didn’t “get it”. Not to say that all of it was forced, but much of it was. I still watch Dean Martin roasts on youtube (Foster Brooks is my favorite) for a good laugh.

    Liked by 3 people

  21. gringz says:

    Does anyone remember the Population Control issue of the 1970s, it was a pretty big deal. They were encouraging people to have no more than 2 children, to just reproduce themselves. Where do the progs stand on that issue now? You’d think it would tie in to their “Climate Change” agenda, I guess it only applies to the white population. They seem to be bragging about how the white race is declining while the minorities are multiplying like rabbits.

    Liked by 1 person

    • nyetneetot says:

      Yeah, there was that whole fruit fly swarm in the glass jar example they would show in grade school. It is false. Was debunked back then, but yeah. It’s part of the UN stuff.

      Liked by 1 person

  22. mcfyre2012 says:

    It’s all nothing but liberal/progressive, media-driven scare tactics.

    According to the US Census Bureau (2013), whites are still the overwhelming majority in the US . Blacks are not even the majority minority anymore.

    http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html

    Obama may have caused African-Americans to be “one and done” in the US presidential category (especially considering the disdain I hear about him from Hispanics and Asians).

    Liked by 2 people

  23. Pingback: The Long Way Down - 10 Practical Tips To 4x4ing Through Africa | Create Resumes | Find Jobs | FastJobz.Com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s