“Journalists” Fear Being Alinsky’d – The 4th Estate Scandal Behind The Benghazi Scandal….

benghazi-massacre-blog-copy(Via Mediaite) As the one year anniversary of the deadly attack on an American consulate in Benghazi approaches, journalists have begun to take another look into the scandal surrounding the government’s response to that terrorist event. Last week, CNN aired two striking reports revealing that the Central Intelligence Agency had a large number of agents on the ground on the night of the attack and that a suspect in the attack has never been interviewed by investigators. Following these revelatory reports, which some in President Barack Obama’s administration believe represent a political threat, some CNN reporters now fear for their access to the White House. They are not alone.

On July 31, CNN’s The Situation Room broadcast a portion of an interview conducted by reporter Arwa Damon with a suspect in the Benghazi attacks. The suspect revealed to Damon that no investigator has attempted to contact him regarding his involvement in that deadly assault. The following day, CNN’s Drew Griffin broke the news that more than 30 CIA agents were on the ground in Libya on the day of the attack and they are being pressured by the spy agency to not reveal to reporters or congressional investigators what they know of the events of that night. Some CNN reporters are reportedly fearful now that their access to the White House will be hampered following their probing into a story that members of the Obama administration would prefer remain uninvestigated. (continue reading)

This entry was posted in Benghazi-Gate, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Dear Leader - Creepy POTUS Worship, Egypt & Libya Part 2, Islam, media bias, Obama Research/Discovery, Susan Rice, Terrorist Attacks, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

28 Responses to “Journalists” Fear Being Alinsky’d – The 4th Estate Scandal Behind The Benghazi Scandal….

  1. John Denney says:

    The president said, ‘I can tell you, as I’ve said over the last couple of months since this happened, the minute I found out what was happening, I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to.”

    Someone gave orders to stand down, countermanding the Commander-in-Chief’s orders.

    Given the military chain-of-command and modern communication technology, it should easily take less than an hour to determine who gave the stand down order.

    So who countermanded the first of your “very clear directives”, Mr. President?


    • JAS says:

      No one did of course. The only person with the authority to order the military to cross sovereign boundaries is the Commander in Chief. No one else can give that order lest their heads get put on a pike. The military brass being what it is would NEVER go off the reservation on something that well defined.

      And of course no one knows where the President was during those critical moments……


  2. StormyeyesC says:

    CNN airs their Benghazi piece tonight @ 10 pm EST


  3. LetJusticePrevail" says:

    If the press corps had any cajones they would report the truth, and then report on any retaliatory denials of access to information by the White House. Ban one reporter from the press conferences, and let the entire press corps refuse to cover Zero’s press releases, or report on anything he has to say.

    Refuse him the podium provided by the press.


    • likebooks says:

      Absolutely agree. They have the control not him. I believe they have to be sitting on hundreds of stories right now. Obviously they don’t want to hurt their fellow comrade.


  4. Helpful says:

    Head of the republican national committee said no republican debates on CNN or MSNBC


    • MKP says:

      Here’s another Stormy to a June telephone interview. Makes you wonder if he was just another part of the grand plan. I saw this right after finding out the compound security was ultimately overseen by a suspected Al-Qaeda operative kidnapped in Thailand by the CIA and then interrogated by the CIA and MI6 in Libya for 5 or 6 months. He supposedly never admitted to his ties to them. Hmmmm.



    • Judy says:

      The internet “black hole” gobbled up some (don’t remember how many but more than just a couple, though) stories I read about how this “blaming the video” came about and it started w/Hillary and the State Dept in a late night scramble for ideas which made sense because of her connection to the Muslim Brotherhood and her most important sidekick, Huma Abedin…..makes sense there was some connection there or how would they have picked him and the trailer out of all the YouTubes. I believe there are enough retired Generals to see this held to accountability. They do not take lightly the loss of lives that could have been saved and then the coverup. Whatever it takes……


  5. Menagerie says:

    Man up and turn the tables on these bully thugs. They hid in the White House while these men were killed. They hid behind the tale of a movie. They hid behind Susan Rice as long as they possibly could. Publish the truth, push it loud and hard into every corner. Focus the light on what they have done, and the fact that they are still hiding and making threats. There is never ever anything to be gained from hiding from a bully, and that includes the bully who is President of the United States of America, his cronies in and out of Congress. I join in calling on the press, the occupiers of the profession formerly known as journalists, to come forward and do their job, with courage, dignity, and above all, honesty. Otherwise take your cowardly tails off and enroll in beauty school or go join PITA. Find a Greenpeace ship.


    • Sam says:


      I’d like to see that happen. I have doubts it will since the top editors and the owners of those media are progressives, just like Obama.


  6. GZanon says:

    “Some suspect that reporters who soft-pedal or [sic] underreport stories uncomfortable to the administration receive preferential access to White House officials.”

    So you can watch these for the Hard-Pedal pulse.
    Recently new Twitter start ups from the speechwriters of old:

    Who they are w/ new addition Jeff Solnet from S. Florida




  7. lovemygirl says:

    The Conservative Report seems to believe Jarrett had a hand in it. It wouldn’t surprise me but how do we find out the reality http://conservativereport.org/benghazi-valerie-jarrett-cic/


  8. timmihendrix says:

    Has anybody read and have an opinion on the “book” Benghazi: the definitive report? They talk about a special part of the state department (name escapes me at the moment) that is similar to the CIA and maybe more secretive. I believe they said john Brennan was involved and the CIA and military would get very frustrated with some of their activies. Check it out and I’ll have to go back and read it again.


    • Sam says:

      I’ve got the e-book. Unfortunately, more has been revealed online, including here, than those authors revealed.


      • timmihendrix says:

        This site is my preferred source of info & insight but I try to read/watch/listen to as many other sources as I can to catch potential additional puzzle pieces. Sometimes it gets a little confusing so I guess my question is what are CTH’s thoughts on the aforementioned theory of the attack being retaliation for JSOC/Brennan targeting a top AAS leader? And what are the ramifications if it is proven(or admitted) that the white house via JSOC/Brennan was smuggling weapons to Syria?


  9. lovemygirl says:

    One thing that seems apparent is they want to treat terrorism as a crime and arrest and try people rather than kill them.

    The Department of Justice has filed charges against Libyan militia leader Ahmed Khattalah over the 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, according to CNN.

    The Wall Street Journal also reports sealed criminal charges were filed, but did not provide names, only saying the charges were filed “against a number of suspects.”


  10. JAS says:

    After reading everything that I could get my hands on and watching all the hearings and interviews, I’ve concluded that “Political Wisdom” ruled the day and people were left to die. Politicians reversed the great old saying to: “Too much guts, no glory”.

    – A presidential election in full swing
    – A large, organized, well armed force on the attack
    – The possibility that there were shoulder fired Anti Aircraft missiles in the area
    – Limited military resources in-country
    – The probability that resources available were not enough to guarantee combat superiority
    – A presidential election in full swing
    – The probability that a rescue attempt would turn into a Carter/Iran moment
    – Only the President could authorize the military to cross international boundaries
    – Additional out of country military resources that were ready to roll told to stand down
    – Presidential campaign advisers whispering in the Presidents ear
    – A presidential campaign in full swing

    The military was ready to roll but the White House cowered – plain and simple. Lives on the ground became less important than the upcoming presidential election. And they will see to it that we NEVER find out the truth.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s