The Daily Caller has a great article today presenting the insight of Mr. Ondray Harris against the backdrop of the DOJ-CRS and the George Zimmerman case. Many of you may remember Mr. Harris quit his job in DC last month after he was told not to hire white people.
Mr. Harris views “racism” without a prism. Meaning he sees race, when used as a definition or qualifier, as antithetical all systems of value. Harris affirms the same principles outlined by Martin Luther King – that all people should be judged by the content of their character.
Cultural Marxists however, use skin color as a tool in an agenda. Cultural Marxists can be any skin color; What defines them is their belief that groups can be manipulated with false association.
The Daily Caller article should be a MUST READ for understanding how the CRS has been corrupted, and how it was/is used by the Black Grievance Industry to advance their ideology of divisive hate. What falls below is our greater explanation of how this hatred attaches itself to the larger Zimmerman Case construct. This information (Q & A Below) was requested several weeks ago by a journalist who was seeking to understand our research. The questions are his, the answers ours.
Q: What is the “Black Grievance Industry”, exactly?
The “BGI”, or Black Grievance Industry is an acronym developed to better explain the groups or affiliations who derive their sense of existence around race-based enterprises. These are professional exploiters of skin color. The entire construct of their purpose and reason for existence is framed around skin color. Hence color defines not only their ideology, but also their associations. They are, in a general sense, perpetually aggrieved.
While there are many local and national groups who could be considered ‘perpetually aggrieved’, the BGI is one of the best known entities because of the duration of exploitive enterprise.
Everything surrounding the activity amid the BGI is race-based. Non-blacks are accustomed by indoctrinated training, by social pressure and by political correctness, to avoid pointing out the hypocrisy behind most, if not all, of the key BGI positions.
The BGI quickly responds to any person or entity who would expose the underbelly of their ideology.
A great recent example of this is Ondray Harris¹ who was a former leader of the Community Relations Service within the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ. Harris recently resigned because he was told not to hire white people by the professional members within the governmental BGI branch. (Harris is African American)
Q: Typically, what sort of role does the BGI serve?
Initially, the BGI was comprised of ‘civil rights’ leaders. The evolution away from civil rights and toward black only rights created a change in the central dynamic of advocacy.
While Martin Luther King found himself aligned with any group or entity who was similarly fighting for equality, the modern BGI actually attack any other entity who would elbow into their place at the professionally aggrieved trough. The BGI believe some are more equal than others.
The professional leadership within the BGI view alignment as risk; and while they may at times join hands with other interests, as soon as those interests present dilution of black messaging, they are dispatched quickly. Remember, everything is about skin color. Nothing else matters – just skin color.
Any alignment may also pose a risk to the financial stakes of the aggrieved. The fiduciary pie, and the potential for division, is a closely guarded point of concern. This is particularly noted in the decision-making from the primary partners in the Industrial BGI Complex: The NAACP, The Congressional Black Caucus, Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition, Al Sharpton’s NAN, etc.
The structural keystones of all BGI activity stem from, and are approved by, these central components of leadership – they are the approvers of all Professional BGI engagements.
These groups and others are connected on a national level, and assisted by the Civil Rights Division within the Federal Department of Justice.
The BGI evolved from historical “civil rights” framed as injustice, to a representative modern ideology of “just us”. Hence, recently Eric Holder finds no cause for reservation when he says “my people”¹.
“Justice” has now become “just us”.
The civil rights arm of the Dept. of Justice is now a modern leveraging or enforcement mechanism to insure the aggrieved are paid off as well as protected. The legal terms such as “adverse impact”, “disparate treatment” and others, have been corrupted to apply to black skin color as the common denominator for the application being reviewed.
The protective agency, who guards the optics of the BGI, is the Community Relations Service (CRS), also known as the DOJ “Peacekeepers”. The primary role of the CRS Peacekeepers is to protect the image of the Black Grievance Industry. They do this by keeping the public unaware of the consequences of the BGI activity and at the same time telling the BGI to put down the molotov cocktails because they can be too easily seen.
The CRS is a federally protected super-secret agency within the DOJ who operate with stealth immunity on behalf of black citizens. To the public face the CRS will claim their interests are to represent, and look out for, minority interests. However, in actual application their only engagements are facilitations around persons of black skin color.
Reserved and discreet, yet engaging and well-connected, Battles and his team were dispatched to the city as the shooting was making national headlines — to assist without drawing attention to themselves.
“He and his staff largely operate out of the spotlight doing very important, very necessary work,’’ said Mark Potok, a senior fellow at the Southern Poverty Law Center, where Battles and his team have received training. “They are going to cities like Sanford that are torn apart by a racial rift, put in an international spotlight. These are places that need help quickly.’’
Black churches coast to coast, and black leadership pastors within the African Methodist Episcopal Church (AME network) structure are the primary members of the local CRS in all communities. These are the first responders per se’; They closely guard the optics.
Q: Judging from your research, what is the BGI’s prime motivator?
Simply put “money”. [The love of which is the root of all evil]
This is the primary motivation behind all of the BGI activity. The second motivation, and all subsequent motivations, which might be sequentially listed, are to protect the first.
Whether through redistributive enterprises such as Pigford I, and II, or through wrongful death exploitations like Martin Lee Anderson, and Trayvon Martin, all other considerations are run though the pre-filter question of: ‘does this produce a financial award’? If the answer is no, then no further engagement is taken.
No-one has ever been able to encapsulate an engagement by the modern BGI, or professional BGI, where altruism trumps the financial considerations. If there is no way to make money – then nothing is done.
One only has to look at the hundreds of dead black youth in Chicago to see affirmation of this self-evident truth.
Q: How did the BGI first become involved with the aftermath of the
Trayvon Martin shooting?
This is a complex question to answer and begins to get to the heart of the Trayvon issues.
We have outlined the players and the development of the BGI scheme, including how they assembled, in the following article:
The short version is, the former junior-partners within the Florida BGI, Daryl Parks and Benjamin Crump, on the heels of a previous exploitation victory (Martin Lee Anderson), and with a historical victory from a political class willing to advance their payoff, against the backdrop of a pending election, they saw an opportunity to win wrongful death awards from: George Zimmerman, The Homeowners Association at the Sub-Division, The Police Department, and potentially the State of Florida.
However, in their zeal and arrogance, this time they did not fully vet their victim. As a consequence of their rush, they overlooked the framework of their scheme; and built it upon a series of easily proven false premises.
Q: What sort of role did the BGI play in the shooting’s aftermath in
terms of attracting media attention?
On Tuesday February 28th after meeting with lead detective Serino, Tracy Martin contacted Benjamin Crump from the law firm Parks and Crump. In turn Crump hired Sanford attorney Natalie Jackson. Subsequently by Monday March 5th, two days after Trayvon was laid to rest, a specific and intentional strategy to manufacture “media evidence” was apparently created by Benjamin Crump and Natalie Jackson, presented and then sold by the newly hired Publicist Ryan Julison. They began a systematic campaign of optical control.
First, they created the outline of their victim “Trayvon Martin”. The goal in this phase was to portray a personality, and to construct a public image of Trayvon Martin to sell to the media. They needed to create the “hook” for interest. The construct need not be real, indeed the outcome was far from the truth, it just needed to be the most marketable for the purpose of “brand imagery”.
They even went so far as to Trademark the Brand they were creating. Control was the key element, as they set about their sales pitches and storyline(s). Everything stemming after that March 5th date was an outcome of their intentional desire to control the narrative and formulate the construct of Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman.
Within 3 days of Trayvon Martin’s death his family hired a media consulting firm. Within two weeks of Trayvon Martin’s death his mother, Sybrina Fulton, filed legal documents to trademark his name. Subsequently Tracy Martin and Sybrina Fulton set out on a cross country tour to collect money. After the coast to coast tour, they took the scheme international and headed to Europe to continue exploiting the financial opportunity.
Q: Judging from your research, was the BGI’s portrayal of Trayvon
Martin generally fact-based?
Not even close. Accepting the fact that we now know Trayvon Martin was diverted from the criminal justice system by School Police Officers falsifying records and intentionally trying to keep him away from consequences for his actions – the skittles narrative was pure spin. 100% totally false.
When I say 100% false, I intend to mean that nothing about how they described Trayvon was accurate. And they had a specific intention to hide the truth about what Trayvon Martin was all about. It was a modern well-scripted Hollywoodesque fabrication.
Modern social websites provide a place where kids can engage with their friends, their circle, their crew, in a manner that expresses their sense of themselves and their individuality, as well as how they desire to be perceived by others. A lot can be learned about a teenager’s value system, and what their aspirations are, by looking specifically at what they are interested in.
For example if you go through your child or teenager’s computer you’ll find on the surface mostly non important or innocent looking videos or searches. But that’s just the illusion.
At this age, 15 to 17, they are very cynical about parents or adults finding out what they are up to. Depending on the level of parental engagement they may hide things, or they may know ways to engage with their on-line community their parents have no idea about because on the surface it seems innocent. Perhaps such is the case with Trayvon Martin.
For instance if you look at Tray’s U-Tube account you’ll notice nothing that would indicate his lifestyle interest would be. Now that the fight videos are removed the only videos immediately visible are from three downloads he created. One made two years ago of a small boy outside his Mom’s yellow house in Miami Gardens. Another two are downloads of songs and re-mixes.
Trayvon was heavily engaged in a “street lifestyle also”.
Q: Do you think that the BGI had any real impact on the State
Attorney’s eventual decision to prosecute George Zimmerman?
How could Sybrina Fulton be approved for a crime victim’s relief fund (March 29th) prior to anyone identifying whether a crime was committed? George Zimmerman was not arrested until April 11th.
The answer is simply political influence via Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi.
Bondi has been a key part of the scheme to enrich her race-motivated friends, Benjamin Crump and Daryl Parks – Trayvon family attorneys, from the beginning.
Pam Bondi has a long-standing personal and professional relationship with Benjamin Crump from her prior work in the Martin Lee Anderson wrongful death case. Bondi was State prosecutor and Crump was the Anderson family attorney who sued the State and County governments for $7.4 million on behalf of his client, Mrs. Anderson (Martin’s mother).
It was Pam Bondi, who in March of 2012 used her position as AG to convince Governor Rick Scott to appoint her friend, and Attorney General 2010 campaign chair, Angela Corey, to prosecute George Zimmerman. The goal was appeasement of the institutional race-baiting class of Seminole County NAACP board member, and Trayvon family attorney Natalie Jackson, along with her friends Benjamin Crump and Daryl Parks who were chasing the financial rewards for Sybrina Fulton and Tracy Martin, TrayParents™.
Q: After Zimmerman was charged, what was the BGI’s next move (or
series of moves)?
While Julison went about pitching the racist white George Zimmerman murdering the innocent Trayvon Martin to the media, which he did very effectively, Benjamin Crump got in touch with his former cohorts from the Martin Lee Anderson case; namely Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and National NAACP President Ben Jealous.
The Zimmerman family quickly noticed the racist narrative being drawn and sold with reckless abandon on all the media, and they reached out to Sanford/Seminole County NAACP President Turner Clayton who they thought would support George Zimmerman from Clayton’s prior knowledge of how Zimmerman actively supported Sherman Ware within the black community. However, if Clayton supported Zimmerman and admitted the non-racist knowledge, then he would be undercutting Natalie Jackson, who was herself a member of his board and now attacking Zimmerman. So Clayton obfuscated and kept his mouth shut so he wouldn’t lose credibility within his own ethnic community.
Ryan Julison continued selling his media pitch to multiple media outlets, and running cover for a few slip ups by Sybrina Fulton, such as when she said she thought the shooting was an accident. The frenzy was fierce and Julison kept chumming the media water.
The narrative was aided by association. The same congressional district now held by Fredrica Wilson is hopefully being passed to Walter A Sutton the appointed Chairman for The Trayvon Martin Memorial Foundation. In addition Fredrica Wilson joined forces with Congresswoman Corrine Brown and initiated a congressional hearing with the full support of the NAACP from Broward and Seminole Counties. Both of whom pressured Sanford City Manager Norton Bonaparte to dispatch Police Chief Bill Lee thereby providing further ammunition for Benjamin Crump to litigate the city of Sanford.
In addition Sanford Mayor Jeff Triplett was backed against the wall and forced to compromise his position with the police chief or face the wrath of the local forces aligned within the NAACP. Triplett’s primary collapse under pressure was evident from his overriding of Chief Lee’s decision not to release the 911 tapes, and after a private viewing on March 16th with all anti-Zimmerman forces in his office he gave them everything they demanded.
Meanwhile NAACP President Ben Jealous, the Congressional Black Caucus, Civil Rights Activists Sharpton and Jackson were assisting Benjamin Crump and Natalie Jackson toward the goal of arrest and financial reward. They had an ACE in their sleeve in addition to the race card on their lapel.
The ACE was John Morgan, from Morgan and Morgan Law firm. Within the law firm Morgan and Morgan sat Partner Greg Francis. Greg Francis was the constructive decision maker behind the Pigford Settlement between black farmers and the Federal Department of Agriculture. Connected both to Washington DC, the CBC, and Orlando, Florida. Coincidently Greg Francis had previously hired Ryan Julison to do the PR and Media Relations work for the Pigford Settlement.
But more importantly, Greg Francis was Partners with John Morgan. Morgan is a HUGE democrat fundraiser, massive contributor, and he had just finished hosting a fundraiser attended by President Obama in Orlando, at the mega-mansion of NBA star Vince Carter. $30,000 / per plate to be exact.
In addition, former Governor Charlie Crist works for Morgan and Morgan, and it was Charlie Crist who persuaded the Florida Legislature to pay off Benjamin Crump and the family of Martin Lee Anderson to the tune of $5 million from the State. The total cash haul from both city and state wrongful deaths lawsuits filed by Parks and Crump was over $7.4 million. The help of Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, along with then Senator Barack Obama was instrumental in winning the award.
So with Benjamin Crump now holding a firm connection to now President Obama, and with John Morgan’s campaign money, and with Greg Francis’s Pigford Washington DC connections, along with the CBC and Sharpton/Jackson et al, in hindsight it was no surprise to see President Obama in the Rose Garden advocating for his donors, friends, and supporters. Heck, I’ll bet Axelrod saw immediate campaign dollar signs from that little quid-pro-quo. A good investment indeed.
Meanwhile unknown to the rest of the world, because the inept and lame institutional media refuses to do just a little digging and research, massive forces are aligned to insure that George Zimmerman remains nothing more than an avenue for more power, greed and prestige.
Just look at how many people are benefitting from this one event. It’s staggering.
Q: How has the BGI dealt with Zimmerman’s trial?
If there was any doubt about the strength of the professional grievance industry aligned against George Zimmerman, and their single-minded focus to convict him despite he evidence to the contrary, one only needs to look at a recent [May, 2013] Bay 9 interview with Francis Oliver, the mother of Trayvon Martin family attorney Natalie Jackson.
The ‘in-your-face’ level of racism expressed by Oliver is quite staggering to witness. However, it should not come as a surprise given the embedded hatred Oliver carries for non-blacks.
“I’ve been fighting white people my whole life seems like” Francis Oliver March 18th 2012
What should be alarming to casual followers is witnessing Oliver’s expressed strategic goal of getting like-minded black racists to find their way onto the jury. Even to the extent of her outlining how potential black jurors need to conceal their animosity:
“Don’t get eliminated before you even get a chance to be questioned. We definitely don’t want it to the point that all blacks are eliminated because we got over excited and blew our chances. At least give us a chance. Give yourself a chance,” said Oliver.
“blew our chances“? Blew their chances at what exactly? Sorry, that’s a rhetorical question, we know exactly what the goal is here – Ms. Oliver has outlined it clearly in all of her prior points of advocacy. The goal is to convict George Zimmerman AT ALL COSTS.
Q: If Zimmerman is acquitted, how do you expect the BGI to react to this?
I’m long past the point of thinking that anything will ever stop the professional BGI from moving on to the next Tawana Brawley, the next Duke Lacross, the next George Zimmerman.
Unless and until the U.S. general public begin to call this for what it is, it will just continue.
Anyone can be the next George Zimmerman. Or even worse, you might just find yourself the next Matthew Owens.
According to police, Owens fussed at some kids playing basketball in the middle of Delmar Drive about 8:30 Saturday night. They say the kids left and a group of adults returned, armed with everything but the kitchen sink.
Police tell News 5 the suspects used chairs, pipes and paint cans to beat Owens.
Owens’ sister, Ashley Parker, saw the attack. “It was the scariest thing I have ever witnessed.” Parker says 20 people, all African American, attacked her brother on the front porch of his home, using “brass buckles, paint cans and anything they could get their hands on.”
As the attackers walked away, leaving Owen bleeding on the ground, Parker says one of them said “Now thats justice for Trayvon.” Trayvon Martin is the unarmed teenager police say was shot and killed February 26 by neighborhood watch captain George Zimmerman in Samford, Florida. (More)….. (More Video)