140 characters of self-important non-secure narcissism leads to libel…..

Recently we were advised of a group of well-funded lawyerly types mining research information for various clients (assumed) regarding intentional falsehoods (lies) in the media and the people who sell them.  People often cite there are too many lawyers with too much free time.   ……Perhaps something good is going to come out of this Trayvon tragedy once and for all.

Those of you who have followed the story know the TreeHouse interest in the Trayvon Martin shooting had, and has, little to do with George Zimmerman.   Actually, the primary interest that hit our radar screen was how the blatantly false construct of racism was developed, coordinated and then injected into the media narrative.

That specific false narrative peaked interest because less than 10 minutes with a laptop and a few google searches clearly identified the same result the FBI came up with after spending thousands of hours.  Which is to say,  regarding racism and George Zimmerman, there simply is no “there” there…..  The racist construct blown up by the media throughout March was 100% fabricated.    Total phony bologna.

But why?   And more importantly for current intents, by whom?   Who created the term “white-Hispanic” and who willingly sold that racist narrative which has now been identified to have killed at least two people, and led to the physical assault of dozens more under the screaming banner of: “Justice for Trayvon”.  (*Note the FOIA requests for 911 call records to Norfolk Virginia in the Virginia-Pilot case are still pending) 

We noted very early on it would be easy to see the first layer of deception when we identified a known entity who appeared on the radar before.   A media consultant named Ryan Julison of Julison Communications.    Julison was/is a man looking to build a bigger brand image and increase his credibility, so we knew it was going to be a simple process of watching his bragging to identify the first circle of media corruption, a la ABC’s Matt Gutman who was well-known to be a major story-teller;  “story” being the operative word.


We also knew that Matt Lauer had been a prior conduit for Julison’s narratives, and we knew of the Greg Francis (Morgan and Morgan) connection along with Mark Nejame(CNN).  But, we also knew the alphabets would not stay engaged beyond a few media cycles, they never do (though they did make it to mid April).  So who was going to continue with the false narrative to embedd the barb of the media hook?

For that answer you need to know the feeder channels who will willingly carry the story along.   Lets call them the second and third circle of deception.  Like sequential rings on a cross-section of a Tree of Lies.

The second circle stays engaged when the “bigs” move on to broader national interests, so the consultants like Julison shift their attention and energy to “circle 2”.   This second circle takes a little longer to identify because there is “less in it for them”.

They are the middle peeps so to speak; and while they are certainly willing to sell a false story –if it is tasty enough– they are not dependent on it.   Generally circle #2 is inside the geography of the incident being reported.  In this case, Orlando, or Sanford, Florida.


Circle #2 includes the Orlando Sentinel reporters of Rene Stutzman and Jeff Weiner, as well as Daralene Jones who was an easy spot from her frequent lunches, and phone calls, with Trayvon attorney Natalie Jackson.   Social media chatter is the easiest way to identify circle #2, and track their comings and goings.   Their ego is always their undoing.

But there is an even bigger circle.   Circle #3.   These are “the outliers” the story “seekers“, the ones most prone to, and at risk for, “creating and fabricating” falsehoods in the media.   Circle #3er’s create the various story angles.    They too are dependent on a specific track, but do not benefit from the geographic proximity of circle #2.

Because they are assigned and often “story dependent” they will, after time, begin to obfuscate the story to irrelevant side issues in a feeble effort to justify their paychecks.  In the Martin case circle #3 would include Frances Nobles of The Miami Herald, and her cohort Joy Ann Reid also of The Miami Herald and NBC’s The Grio.   (The Grio is a race based media news website targeting black audiences).

Joy-Ann Reid, TheGrio.Com and The Miami Herald

Circle 3’s constant need to feed the pipeline with information places them in a tenuous position of risk for advancing unvetted information.

Circle #3 subsequently becomes the biggest media risk factor, and consequently the biggest opportunity for punitive and compensatory reward.   Especially if circle 3 is attached to a media conglomerate such as McClatchy-Tribune.

It is easy to point out the bias of the bigs or alphabets, because there, in circle #1, it is broadcast on a big stage and millions of eyes are watching.   But it is within the feeder groups, circle 2 and 3, where some of the most corrupt reporting originates.   Often they are also known as “The Affiliates”.

The past decade plus has seen massive mergers of media entities and now, due to the assimilation and synergy, the actions of the affiliates no longer stand alone in risk.  The risk carries from the Southeast all the way to New York City.

This is a considerable change from the Atlanta Park Bombing libel action where multiple media entities were individually liable as independent agents.   Today, due to the mergers and acquisitions,  they are collectively liable–a significant shift in the paradigm of risk for Risk Management Departments and actuarials to judge.

You might remember it was a Miami NBC Affiliate who selectively edited out the 911 call to make it look like George Zimmerman was identifying the suspicious character as “black”.  The New York Times reported on the initial NBC (Today Show) firing of the Circle #1, national producer.

It was also an ABC affiliate who manipulated the stolen CCTV footage from the Sanford Police Station to make it look as if George Zimmerman was not injured.   These affiliates are generally in circle 3 and submit their false narratives up into bigger New York based national network channels.

Indeed it was there at the national level where the manipulations became more evident as more and more eyes were peering at the fabricated and heavily manipulated storylines.

A complex new research approach is now needed to find the specific manipulators who would willingly, and with specific intent, lie on the record, in a traceable fashion, within the second and third layer because they actually coordinate their lies and falsehoods.

Think of it like a business of one-upmanship where quid-pro-quo is now more easily identified than the old school approach of media competition.

Again, it is easy to identify the liars in circle one, and often their own sense of self-importance will take them out.   See Dan Rather, or more recently Brian Ross.   The defamation/libel/slander suits are easily identified and persued at this level; it becomes a little harder in the second and third circle because, historically, the costs benefit analysis to the plaintiff, or the plantiff’s representation, did not merit litigious expenditure.

See the Richard Jewell case for great examples: The lie originates from individual reporter at Atlanta Journal Constitution (circle 2) then carried into the New York Post (Circle one) and then CNN along with NBC.    All of which settled with Richard Jewell for large sums money, as did the AJC.

The media, in that example, were not collaborating per se; they were just selling a false construct based on initially false information.   Now however, there is actual collaboration to sell a falsely constructed narrative; hence the new age employment of the Ryan Julisons’.

In the example of George Zimmerman, and all of the potential litigants encircling the case, including the victims of the “Justice For Trayvon” crimes, the nucleus appears to be ABC Miami affiliate and reporter Matt Gutman.   This is very easy to prove; actually too easy, because Ryan Julison was bragging far too much about how he manipulated Gutman to sell his constructed stories.

It almost screamed absurd through the small screen when Matt Gutman actually reported with a straight face about sitting down for another of his “exclusives”, this time with Martin family attorney Benjamin Crump and a telephonic interview with the “ear-witness” DeeDee.   Only the question was: what *reporter* would willingly subject themselves to interview rules where they are not permitted to ask questions of the interviewee?

Talk about selling propaganda under the guise of exclusivity….. ‘you’ve come a long way baby’.

In modern media venues, exposing the second tier to successful litigation is a little more challenging, but there is enough connectivity and similarity in lies within the storyline to clearly show the coordination.  Plus they publicly twitter to each other and follow each other… BONU$ !

Getting litigation level to circle 3 is usually highly challenging.  However, challenging is not impossible–you just need to know their taste (for bait), and their ego (for approach).  Then put tracers and track backs on the social media platforms and, voila!

Apparently, according to researchers acting on behalf of potential class litigants,  more than a few perimeter circle #3 media types have taken such approaches, including actual reporting based solely on the creation of “for use” fake websites, and known-to-be false information.  Awesome job Team Freedom;  and now it can be shown how they connect it, coordinate it, and sell it.

Yes, you read that right.  They, especially the circle 3 crowd, actually base their reporting off FAKE CREATED websites.    Meaning someone provides them a degree of separation, or a manipulative cover, to report on a website story even though they know it to be false, as a method to avoid libel.

But the use of known deceptive and intentionally falsely constructed information is not only subject to easy civil action, it also subjects them to criminal considerations.

As with most people who become too smart by half, they make TWO HUGE MISTAKES which can be recorded and captured.  First, when they seed the trail to the fake source, they do so again using public social media.  It becomes quite easy to show how they knew the information within their reporting was FALSE and intentionally fabricated.

Second, they naively believe that DM or ‘direct messaging’ via twitter on mobile platforms is ‘transmission secure’, and they also believe email submitted via wireless telecommunication is a secure way to transmit data.    They might be socially fluent with media, but the new guards of the fourth estate are unfortunately naive regarding data collection and technology.  One would think the recent experiences of wikileaks would create prudent pause.  Alas recording and capturing activity is no longer challenging.    You no longer need to be seated behind them at the lunch counter.  They who write the scripts, well, most, have taken conversations, and transmissions onto mobile non-encrypted platforms.

As one Anonymous collaboration recently cited, a single Coral Gables, FL cell tower alone routes virtually all data from the Miami Herald affiliates; the process is called “packet sniffing”.

It’s not considered felony wiretapping “to intercept or access an electronic
communication made through an electronic communication system that is configured
so that such electronic communication is readily accessible to the general
public,” according to the text
of the federal wiretapping statute
. The Justice Department has consistently declined to state its views on the issue due to constitutional boundaries, and the U.S. courts have not clearly addressed the issue.

So if one were inclined with simple wireless technology found at Radio Shack,  the capture of wi-fi transmitted data is even more simple than RFID content.  It is almost effortless.

Sometimes, well, actually most of the time now, the media forgets to step out from their echo-chamber and engage in truth seeking without a predetermined conclusion in mind.

When you combine these significant vulnerabilities with the all too often emotionally and ideologically based bias, the dropping of the professional standard is easily documented.   The deceptive, and all too vulnerable underbelly, is then exposed to the disinfectant of sunlight.     Grab the popcorn… this is apparently about to get really good.

This entry was posted in Death Threats, media bias, Predictions, Racism, Tip Line, Trayvon Martin, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

75 Responses to 140 characters of self-important non-secure narcissism leads to libel…..

  1. Marguerita in blender, chaise lounge centered, popcorn in hand. Ready for the ride of a lifetime!!!!


  2. elvischupacabra says:

    Holy Cow! I feel like I just had dinner with Mr. Wizard!

    We need a flow-chart of this thing. Really.

    Thanks for all your hard work.


  3. doodahdaze says:

    Media Matters, David Brock, DNC, Daily Kos. It was started in order for the websites to be the source of absurd DNC Propaganda that the Big Boys could run with. All carefully planned and implemented by the DNC. The Leftist Blogosphere was begun with the specific purpose of dissemination of false premise to be fed to the MSM. NYT v SULLIVAN pre-dated the Computer/Internet/Social Media Revolution, but the SCOTUS RULING is the springboard. NYT v SULLIVAN in the 60’s was the ruling that allowed reporters to lie and slander in the name of social justice.


  4. Kyozokuninja says:

    Smiling. Bloody Mary in hand (in honor of a ‘wake-up call’ for America); Hot Tamales on the side (for the added spice America is about to get). Ready, Treepers!


  5. sunnydaze77 says:

    This is such good news after a bad night with little sleep.Thank you SDC….now if i can read some info that the unethical lawyers have been reported to the Fl Bar and action is actually going to be taken would be the whipped cream.Then i will add the cherry when i hear that the parties involved in contacting the AG claiming GZ committed a hate crime are investigated. I wonder what Corrine Brown and Frederica Wilson are up to these days, Hows Al,JJ, Crump and N Jackson? Have not heard much from these folks recently…Gee, the thought of heads rolling is such a pleasant image in my mind.


  6. aoifecrane says:

    Update on the meeting in Sanford yesterday to ‘honor’ Trayvon…some woman is demanding a statue of him to remind everyone of the dangers of profiling. Guess she didn’t get the FBI memo that THERE WAS NO PROFILING. The stupid is strong in some.


    • doodahdaze says:

      Victimhood is not allowed to be challenged. Without their Victimhood the agenda is lost. You could elect the whole NAACP and Black Panthers to office and they would never give up Victimhood.


    • minpin06 says:

      Was it NatJacs mother that said she has been fighting white people all her life? Maybe it was her demanding the statue. I’d guess the city of Sanford wishes they never heard the names Tracy and Trayvon Martin. They weren’t residents, and they spent little time there, yet they turned the city into a hot bed of racism.


  7. 22tula says:

    Excellent work unraveling the biggest ball of twine Sundance!


  8. sunnydaze77 says:

    I didnt know Daralene was the president, why not just have……Central Florida Association of Journalists. ? why does it have to be black?..can whites label and have organizations such as this?


    • sunnydaze77 says:

      sorry i was so pizzed i forgot the link….http://cfabj.org/?p=803


      • stringplayer55 says:

        Wow! The CFABJ confirms exactly what SDC proclaims with his blog! To whit:

        “Join CFABJ, Saturday, August 11, 2012, as we discuss the death of Trayvon Martin and the case against George Zimmerman. CFABJ has gathered a panel that will shed light on the case, USING JOURNALISTS AND PUBLIC RELATIONS SPECIALISTS INTIMATELY INVOLVED IN THE COVERAGE.”

        It isn’t sufficient in this day and age to employ investigative journalism to uncover truth. Rather, we need public relations specialists to figure out how “journalists” are to present a narrative, how to spin it for maximum effect!

        Of course, it has long been apparent that documenting facts of the case (good old investigative journalism) has been missing from the TM/GZ story. But for CFABJ to actually publicize that PR teams led by Black voices have helped shape the news is astounding to me. Apparently, they believe that such audacity will have no consequence to their continued association!


    • ytz4mee says:

      Segregation when it suits them ….. and forced Integration on solely their terms.


  9. knuckledragingwino says:

    You do realize that the threat of law suits for slander and libel gives these villains a vested interest in GZ’s conviction?

    If I was a liability management lawyer with these major medi companies, I would be telling my bosses that their liability risk is so severe that they have only two choices:

    Offer GZ multimillion dollar settlements to indemnify them,


    Engage in continuing unethical and illegal behavior in an effort to get GZ convicted which will then allow them to claim that truth is the perfect defense for liable.

    You don’t suppose that some network or newspaper has communicated with Judge Lester the Molester during his copious vacation time that he would be recruited for some position with a multimillion dollar salary if GZ and SZ are convicted and destroyed?

    Heck, if I was a network exec, I’d offer O’Mara a multimillion contract to set SZ and GZ up for perjury charges on the PayPal account issue.


    • aoifecrane says:

      MOM has some potential ethical issues with regards tot he PayPal account. There are recorded phone conversations where GZ states he told MOM about the money prior to the hearing. MOM says he doesn’t remember the conversation but I find that hard to believe. That is such a basic thing–indigent status–that any conversation about assets should have sent red flags up for MOM. Not something that a lawyer would ignore IMO. If GZ was told by MOM or it was indicated that the PayPal acct. was unimportant, then GZ was acting on the advice of his attorney and that could be a real problem.


  10. ytz4mee says:

    It seems that we’re not the only ones fed up with the outright lies and prog Propaganda.
    Traveling Romney Press Secretary Rick Gorka tells press scrum (or is that “scum”??) to “kiss my a**) in Poland. Reported at Breitbart, cross posted on the Open – but makes the point that no one with any integrity is willing to put up with their antics any.more.



  11. waltherppk says:

    Anonymous should have a prog propagandist pursuit song befitting an apex predator, a ballad for the raptor that cometh….a message for the progs…..a song with only one verse….
    “One of these days, I’m going to cut you into little pieces!” (maybe today, if not today…soon)


  12. gretchenone says:

    Breitbart is here.


  13. Josie Smith says:

    ????????????????????? Something today?

    1h Benjamin Crump, Esq. Benjamin Crump, Esq. ‏@attorneycrump

    Community wide prayer service today 12:30PM in front of the Sanford PD for #TrayvonMartin. For more information, call (407) 209-6162


  14. johngalt90210 says:

    “Grab the popcorn… this is apparently about to get really good.”

    Really good? Contingent fee lawyers filing lawsuits with detailed narrative complaints good?


  15. aoifecrane says:

    Sometimes it is good to go back to the basics. I decided to take a look at the Neighborhood Watch documents and see what their documents advise. Well…this is interesting and if I were MOM, I’d be bringing this out in support of GZ. He was following the NW program. Look specifically on pages 20-21. “You should pay attention to things like: Physical setting – Specific location, time of day, day of week
    • People – What do they look like? (height, weight, ethnicity, gender, etc.) How many are there?
    • Specific items – What is important?”
    “Clothing is important, but look for things that cannot be changed, like skin or eye color, tattoos, scars, moles, height and weight.”
    and this: “Some common examples of suspicious activities can include:
    • A stranger loitering in your neighborhood or a vehicle cruising the streets repeatedly.
    • Someone loitering around schools, parks or secluded areas.”

    It goes on but you get the gist. Unless the bottom feeders demand NW be more PC, it’s going to get really hard to argue that GZ did not follow NWs own instructions.



    • margegunderson says:

      Good job!


    • doodahdaze says:

      Post Travon NW…
      !. If you see anyone suspicious close your eyes and hope they go away.
      2. If you open eyes and they are still there run to house and hide.
      3. If you call Police do not tell them a description you may be arrested.
      4. If they are Black run away and leave your doors open and all valuables on front porch.
      Call all neighbors and tell them to put all valuables out in driveway for easy collection by the Thugs.


      • knuckledragingwino says:

        This is exactly the problem. While Crump and crew initially alleged that GZ “hunted TM down like a dog” there fallback position has become that TM did launch a preemptive and unrelenting assault on GZ, but it was GZ’s fault because GZ provoked TM by “profiling him.”. If GZ is convicted, it will establish a precedent that goes far beyond the issue of use of deadly force in self defense. It will make it illegal or at least legally inadvisable to call the police to report suspicious persons who are African-American. It will become open season on whites and Asians.


  16. 22tula says:

    “Bully Tactics Within Socialist Organizations over Use of Trayvon Martin Case: Class Warfare vs. Racism. Ties to Obama Administration?” – RomanticPoet


    • ytz4mee says:

      Thank you. A highly entertaining read of internecine warfare. Glad someone is willing to slog through the cesspool of socialist/marxist publications.


    • margegunderson says:

      Remember this?

      In comments that can be seen as an effort to intimidate Florida’s special state prosecutor Angela Corey with nationwide race riots, Benjamin Crump, an attorney for the family of slain 17 year-old black Floridian Trayvon Martin warned of “pandemonium” around America and the world should Corey decide to not prosecute admitted Martin killer George Zimmerman, who has claimed self-defense. Crump issued the dire warning in an interview with BBC5.

      In a case that has inflamed racial tensions across the United States and drawn global attention, the unarmed Martin was shot to death by Zimmerman on February 26 as he walked in a gated community in Sanford, Florida, where Martin was staying with his father at the home of his father’s fiance. Minutes before the shooting, Zimmerman had called police to report a suspicious man in his community where he served as a neighborhood watch volunteer.

      Sanford police briefly detained, but did not charge Zimmerman in the shooting. The 5’9″, 28 year-old Zimmerman has claimed self-defense, saying Martin had attacked him and he feared for his well-being as the 6’3″ Martin pounded his head on the ground after knocking him off his feet with a sucker punch.

      Crump was speaking to the BBC after the special Florida state prosecutor Angela Corey announced on Monday that she would not empanel a grand jury in the case and would decide on her own whether to prosecute Zimmerman.

      Crump expressed confidence that Corey would eventually charge Zimmerman, but when queried by the BBC that Corey could indeed choose to not prosecute Zimmerman, Crump said,”She could, yeah she could. And I think if she did that (decided to not prosecute Zimmerman)it would be pandemonium. There would be outrage all over America and all over the world.”


      • doodahdaze says:

        Don’t forget Judge Lester following Al Sharpton’s orders to revoke the bond.


      • johngalt90210 says:

        Crump said,”She could, yeah she could. And I think if she did that (decided to not prosecute Zimmerman)it would be pandemonium. There would be outrage all over America and all over the world.”

        “Pandemonium” I Like it: Crump admits that damages from the race-baiting false narrative conspiracy were foreseeable.


        Proximate cause
        Recovery of damages is subject to the legal principle that damages must be proximately caused by the wrongful conduct of the defendant. This is known as the principle of proximate cause. This principle governs the recovery of all compensatory damages, whether the underlying claim is based on contract, tort, or both.[8] Damages are likely to be limited to those reasonably foreseeable by the defendant. If a defendant could not reasonably have foreseen that someone might be hurt by their actions, there may be no liability.
        This rule does not usually apply to intentional torts (for example, deceit), and also has stunted applicability to the quantum in negligence where the maxim Intended consequences are never too remote applies – ‘never’ is inaccurate here but resorts to unforeseeable direct and natural consequences of an act.


      • minpin06 says:

        Remember when Al Sharpton said that “he didn’t trust Gov. Scott and prosecutor Angela Corey, but they did their job when they charged Zimmerman with second degree murder.”


        If you take Sharpton at his word, the Gov. of Fla. was in on charging Zimmerman with the second murder charge. This is the first I’ve heard of any Gov. involving themselves in a local law enforcement matter, and dictating what a defendant would be charged with. Can’t Scott get in trouble for that if it can be proven?


        • aoifecrane says:

          Well..I don’t think Scott personally was involved in the decision. He’s the head of the government here and as such was probably, or should have been, kept updated on the case. Bondi, we know, has close ties to Corey and threw this bone to her to help her re-election. Sharpton, we also know, isn’t the sharpest tack in the drawer and misspeaks frequently. It could also be that in his view, the governor can just do what the hell he wants as head of state. Pretty much in line with what Obungler’s been doing since day one. After all…’he won’ and explains how no one in the LSM or the proggie pundits have had an issue with all these EOs and unConstitutional acts thus far.


          • recoverydotgod says:

            This statement from Pam Bondi reads to me like Gov. Scott was directly involved.

            March 22, 2012 release from Florida attorney general website.



            • diwataman says:

              What’s really odd is her statement “The Governor and Attorney General reached out to State Attorney Norman Wolfinger today. After the conversation, Wolfinger decided to step down from this investigation and turn it over to another state attorney.” But in Wolfingers letter to Scott he said “I would respectfully request the executive assignment of another state attorney” as if he went to them first. So if he wanted to step down before they all had their little meeting, and wrote them saying so, why would she say ” After the conversation, Wolfinger decided to step down”?

              I really get the feeling he was more pushed out then he asking to be put out. To bad he’s too much of a coward to speak up about it, like Bill Lee, Serino and everyone else caving into the political pressure because the black community is in an uproar over a manufactured hate crime and manufactured racial injustice.



              • recoverydotgod says:

                Go back to the BET tv bondi to crump limousine call posted a few weeks back. March 22 is on the screen…but those sure look like million march hoodie day clothes the family had on. So I would put that call the day before. Surely that wouldn’t be protocol before talking to state attorney in charge of the case.


          • doodahdaze says:



      • truthfan7 says:

        pandemonium – Literally means abode of all demons (or hell), from Greek pan-, “all,” and daimon, “demon(s).”

        Just sayin.


  17. czarowniczy says:

    “…clearly identified the same result the FBI came up with after spending thousands of hours…” is the key phrase. Civilian researchers were looking for a truth while the FBI, under Holder’ is primarily a political tool. When the FBI generates any information in a politically-charged, high-profile case such as this it’s first vetted through daily Sniff the Air meetings where not only the validity of the information is looked at but also the political weight it carries. Information can be held to be squeezed in at a later date with other information to modify the info’s impact, it can be tweaked or restated, it can be completely buried – there’s a number of options. There’s a lot of hi-profile cases in the past that, years later, independent researchers have unearthed information that reflected on the cases, information the FBI should have easily uncovered but…
    We need to go no farther back than J. Edgar’s statement that the Mafia didn’ exist, it was a figment of Hollywood imagination or, a bit later, the revelations that the FBI had manufactured evidence to convict obviously guilty parties when no such evidence existed. I can just imagine the FBI meetings on Trayvon shooting evidence when they try and decide how to filter the evidence to make the boss and the bosses boss happy.


  18. landaumurphyfan says:

    I posted this on the open thread but it’s kind of relevant here as an example of manipulative “journalism”.

    Here’s today’s example of slovenly “reporting”: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/boy-arrested-over-daley-tweets-084841651–oly.html

    Now y’all are thinking the Olympic diver has overreacted, the tweet was tasteless but hardly threatening, the thought police are being called in, etc, right? But here is **proper** coverage including some of the twitterer’s other tweets: http://www.tavistockpeople.co.uk/Twitter-user-Rileyy_69-arrested-Tom-Daley-hate/story-16619337-detail/story.html

    Ah, nothing like starting the day by stirring up the masses by only giving ‘em part of the story, eh?


  19. Snaps Bacula says:

    They mentioned SDC’s real name in their own article & say he has “an unhealthy obsession with George Zimmerman, and is overcome with racial paranoia.”

    The people who champion black on white riots, flash mob robbing sprees, public prosecution & persecution without a fair trial, & claim that any black man arrested for anything is a victim of profiling are calling SDC racially paranoid. Is moonbat season in yet? I’m ready to bag & tag.


    • johngalt90210 says:

      “They mentioned SDC’s real name in their own article”

      Either that or they fell into SDC’s punji pit. Not sure which.


    • myopiafree says:

      Hi Snaps, No, SDC has a healthy respect for telling the truth, and supporting the TRUTHFUL George Zimmerman. We all know that George was not a racist. The persecution of George is the result of the Neo-Racists cruel antics.


  20. nameofthepen says:

    I hereby nominate TheConservativeTreehouse.com for this year’s Pulitzer Prize in Investigative Reporting.

    Ha ha…what a fantasy, since I consider the Pulitzer Prizes to be simply another incestuous circle-jerk amongst the Tribe of Liars and Frauds.

    Treepers, your work here has been one of the most encouraging things I’ve seen in quite a while.

    My deepest respect, admiration and gratitude to the ALL of you.


    • minor4 says:

      I didn’t completely follow all of your post — but I do hope at some point George maintains a defamation suit against anyone and everyone he can throw his net around.

      I know Crump and his clients Sybrina and Tracy are mindful of this possibility based on their radically changed narrative and conspicuous back peddling

      Remember a few years ago when one of the Natalee Holloway suspects sued Dr Phil and his media conglomeration and Natalee Holloway’s mother based on a claim that Phil “doctored” an audio tape? That was a loser case, but it goes to show you that such a suit will survive summary dismissal — and in George’s case where the elements of defamation are actually present, he might be able to obtain a sizable judgment.


  21. richbranson305 says:

    Someone should email Lester the court Jester a link to this site. Maybe if he understood that are forces that back Zimmerman and true justice, he wouldn’t be so inclined to send him up the river.


  22. diwataman says:

    I think one person who should sue is Bill Lee but that coward went into hiding. Apparently Wolfinger still has his job though he won’t be running for re-election, another coward. Bondi, Scott and Corey, all cowards, are now adored by the black community and white people are apathetic, white-guilt ridden or support it and won’t do anything. George is too nice to sue. Shelly will just hang back. George’s mom just wants to be with her family. George’s dad is trying to avoid heart failure. Who’s left?


    • recoverydotgod says:

      Chief Lee press conference on March 13th and then sit down with Orlando Sentinel on March 16th and subsequently his remarks when Bonaparte fired him was speaking truth in the face of overwhelming forces and pressure.

      There is still a long way to go in this case, and the media and political figures involved know they have to put up a house of cards from a house that already fell. Who knows who will start speaking up as the truth marches on.


  23. cairndog says:


    EXCELLENT article!

    Very thorough and educating; written so well that I understood it all.

    Thank you!


  24. diwataman says:

    I have a work in progress that was originally intended to focus on Tracy Martin quotes in regards to race and the Sanford PD but it is growing into a larger picture that might be helpful in regards to what’s being talked about here. I’m essentially compiling quotes from what has now become infamously known as The Scheme Team; Natalie Jackson, Bejamin Crump, Daryl Parks, Jasmine Rand, Tracy Martin and Sybrina Fulton.

    “Julison said he focused the communications strategy on three central messages: an unarmed teenager killed by an armed man; the quest for justice; and how to avoid a similar situation in the future”

    Just looking at the quotes alone that I’ve compiled so far and you can see the strategy was mainly to cause racial strife by painting George, the Sanford Police Department, and State Attorney out to be racists or at the very least to be acting or not acting because Trayvon was black.

    Then there are their actions which I have also been compiling in my blog “Martin Magical Money Tour”

    Add to that the fact that they had insiders working for them in the SPD and look at the fact that there was in fact an active ongoing investigation through all of this and you get what can only be seen as pure madness on the part of the Scheme Team. They need to be held accountable.

    Tracy Martin Quotes in Regards to the Sanford PD and Race

    Martin Magical Money Tour

    From Wolfinger to Corey

    Tracy Martin, Sanford PD and NOBEL

    Timeline of Evidence


    • woohoowee says:

      diwataman – more info on NOBLE

      Pull up a FOX 16 video for July 21, ” NOBLE organization in Little Rock for conference” Jiles Ship says (paraphrasing) that NOBLE will follow this all the way through to see that the Martin’s receive justice.

      Link below for Obama – Biden Transition Project. (scroll down and click on NOBLE document 20090115 pdf).


      NOBLE sent a letter of support to 2009 Senate Hearing 111-403 – Nomination of Eric H. Holder, Jr., however, the letter is not available online. It is available through the Government Printing Office. I followed a link through Leahy’s website for the letter, but the link is broken 404 error.

      February 12, 2010 Holder addresses NOBEL (I notice he addresses fairness in this speech, also):


      More links next post.


      • doodahdaze says:

        The Communist’s are well entrenched.


        • woohoowee says:

          Yep, the commies are entrenched. We’ve gotta unentrench (can I make up words as I go…lol?) them!! More posts to come.


          • Sharon says:

            Why, yes, you can. 🙂 “Unentrench” it is–first used here on July 31, 2012. Excellent.


            • woohoowee says:

              Whoo Hoo! New word:). We can start unentrenching by pulling ObamaScareTax and bias/hate crimes out by the roots. Gotta toss all the Commies out along with their putrid legislation, too.


              • Sharon says:

                And the unentrenching must include cleaning out the bureacracies and throwing the EPA and the misnamed “education department” out of business. Shut the doors. And let the teaching begin.


                • woohoowee says:

                  Yep, EPA & dumbucation department(‘nother new word:) must go. Then bar the door, Katy!

                  An aside, we know more than a few teachers who left education altogether because of the government insanity. They’re all pretty much satisfied with new careers, but most would teach again in a heartbeat if the dumbucation department were to gone for good.


                • woohoowee says:

                  Ugh, need edit function. Last sentence has a to which snuck in there all by itself, I’m sure:)


      • woohoowee says:

        In the link below NOBLE’s president, Jiles H. Ship basically says (my take): Numerous U.S. Cities are powder kegs due to racial profiling and that profiling is why snitches get stitches.

        It isn’t the individual criminal acts nor the community at fault you see, it’s the fault of police or discrimination (prog thought process will give ya brain damage!).

        November 11, 2011 Hearing on: “21st Century Law Enforcement: How Smart Policing Targets Criminal Behavior:

        Looking at all this made me wonder about bills in the House and Senate. Located
        H.R. 3618: End Racial Profiling Act of 2011 (basically identical to Senate 1670) linked below. Many things I noticed about this bill, but I’ll just mention SEC. 102. ENFORCEMENT includes the words disparate impact (remind ya of the EO Zippy recently signed for African American education?!). Doesn’t look like either bill is going anywhere.



    • doodahdaze says:

      Quest for social justice=Reparations


  25. woohoowee says:

    More in NOBLE

    This one from 2004:

    “The National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives (NOBLE) was founded in September, 1976. NOBLE has passed resolutions supporting the goals and efforts of the Brady Campaign”


    This one from less than one week ago:

    “National Law Enforcement Leadership Organizations Issue Call for Stronger Federal Gun Laws in Wake of Aurora Theater Shooting”

    Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, Inc.
    Hispanic American Police Command Officers Association
    International Association of Campus Law Enforcement Administrators
    International Association of Chiefs of Police
    Major Cities Chiefs Association
    National Association of Women Law Enforcement Executives
    National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives
    Police Executive Research Forum
    Police Foundation



  26. cairndog says:

    August 8, GZ has a court date for “Sounding Docket”.

    Does anyone know if this is the same as a preliminary hearing?


    • diwataman says:

      This is what I found on the two terms;

      preliminary hearing

      n. in criminal law, a hearing to determine if a person charged with a felony (a serious crime punishable by a term in the state prison) should be tried for the crime charged, based on whether there is some substantial evidence that he/she committed the crime. A preliminary hearing is held in the lowest local court (municipal or police court), but only if the prosecutor has filed the charge without asking the Grand Jury for an indictment for the alleged crime. Such a hearing must be held within a few days after arraignment (presentation in court of the charges and the defendant’s right to plead guilty or not guilty). Since neither side wants to reveal its trial strategy, the prosecution normally presents only enough evidence and testimony to show the probability of guilt, and defendants often put on no evidence at all at the preliminary hearing, unless there is a strong chance of getting the charges dismissed. If the judge finds sufficient evidence to try the defendant, the case is sent to the appropriate court (variously called superior, county, district, common pleas) for trial. If there is no such convincing evidence, the judge will dismiss the charges. In the “Perry Mason” television series, the courtroom scenes were almost always of preliminary hearings.


      Docket sounding: A meeting between the judges and attorneys for the purpose of determining the schedule of cases for a specific period of time.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s