Report from Petraeus: The “Talking Points” from Susan Rice were not from the CIA… Meanwhile The WH is Freaking Out…

The consistent lies and outright scheming from the Obama White House are about to reach sunlight.  Various intelligence reporters are now pointing out that Petraeus is stating the Susan Rice “talking points” about Benghazi DID NOT come from his intelligence office gathering, they came from the White House.  (Obama screwed up yesterday when he openly took ownership of them – his handlers are freaking)

EYES WIDE OPEN - Now reports are leaking that Petraeus is “under investigation” for security leaks.  THIS IS NOT ACCIDENTAL OR UNCONNECTEDRemember the goal: The White House GOAL:   1.) Move current opinion of Gen Petraeus 2.) Use CIA Angle as cover for misleading information. 3.) Take no responsibility for the lies and falsehoods. They must find a way to stop Petreaus from collapsing their narrative.

Think of advancing their objectives like advancing a football in the game toward the Goal line:

√20 yard line – Petraeus is a solid patriot ===> √ …. Fri
√30 yard line – Petraeus is fallible/human ====> √ …. Sat/Sun
√40 yard line – Petraeus lost his capacity for judgement ====> √…. Mon
√50 yard line – Petraeus is/was distracted ===> √ …. Tue
√40 yard line – Petraeus is compromised ===> √ …. Wed (presser avoidance)
√30 yard line – Petraeus is unstable ===> √… Thr (under investig)
√20 yard line – Petraeus is not-credible ===> Friday 11/16 (he talks to congress)
10 yard line – Petraeus is out for revenge. ====> Weekend….
Touchdown – Petraeus is a liar.

Each Administration player, including Media “special teams” (See Michael Hastings and CNN Suzanne Kelly) will have a specific goal in advancing the narrative of protection for the Administration.

Remember: “How to win the optic game”? Isolate => Ridicule => Marginalize.

It is how they roll. Always.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Benghazi-Gate, CIA, Clinton(s), Egypt & Libya Part 2, Election 2012, Islam, media bias, Obama re-election, Political correctness/cultural marxism, Racism, Sept 11, Susan Rice, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

73 Responses to Report from Petraeus: The “Talking Points” from Susan Rice were not from the CIA… Meanwhile The WH is Freaking Out…

  1. Sam says:

    Nice graphics. The football analogy seems quite apt.

  2. recoverydotgod says:

    Where did Amb Rice get talking points before the Ohio State University game on saturday Sept 15?

  3. The intelligence given to the White House from the DNI included the linkage to al-Qaeda and anwar al sharia. Those al-Qaeda elements were removed by either the White House or “insider” elements in the National Security Council.

    Once the intelligence was “cleaned up” with the al-Qaeda verbage removed, then “that version” of the talking points was given to Susan Rice.

    This is the aspect that will come out of the hearing with CIA Petraeus – apparently this is also the aspect the White House has a fear of reaching sunlight because it shows their manipulative agenda. That said, it can only be reasonable to accept that Susan Rice was inside that conversation as they contemplated who would take lead….

    Clapper, Clinton, Petraeus, et al, could not really take point on that Sunday because their departments had contradictory information that they would be arguing in opposition to. Hence, Rice was the preferred liar because she carried the highest degree of plausible deniability….

    Tomorrow should be good for the advancement of Truth.

    Unfortunately tomorrow the WH will also shift their Petraeus narrative to diminish his credibility and paint him as a scorned former co-worker with a chip on his shoulder. Then by Monday they will openly call him a liar.

    • marie says:

      I don’t think calling him a liar will work. A simple video of all of Obama’s statements on this issue tell the truth of the cover-up.

      However, even more damning is that today the Acting Director also said that the talking points Rice had were not the info the CIA passed on….so if the POTUS wants to call Petraeus a liar, he has to also call the guy he appointed Acting Director a liar.

      What has to be said over and over and over is “These men didn’t have to die.” My gawd, the Ambassador made clear his desire for security and it never came.

      If nothing else, all ABC, CBS, and NBC butt-lickers and nutt suckers should have this splayed in response to their every tweet.

      I just looked at Jake Tapper’s twitter–not a word of today’s hearings and what the people who’ve come out of them have said. And he’s pointed to as a “decent guy”? The guy’s a tool, a mush-head.

      • Kimusa says:

        I don’t remember where I first read it, perhaps here – but it was thought that this Benghazi thing was supposed to be a kidnapping of the ambassdor set up by Obama and if all went as planned they would ask to trade the ambassador for some terroist we had captured to make Obama look like a hero just before the election (sorta like the Osama B.L thing). Problem is, the terrorists got a taste of blood and couldn’t stop until they had not only killed our ambassdor, but tortured him extensively.
        Funny thing is…the speech that Broadwell gave in Colorado at the University of Denver on 10/26/12 included this: “Now I don’t know if a lot of you heard this, but the CIA annex had actually — had taken a couple of Libyan militia members prisoner and they think that the attack on the consulate was an effort to try to get these prisoners back. So that’s still being vetted,” she said.
        This needs to all come out and Patraeus is just the soldier to do it – he has to remember the brotherhood he holds with his fellow soldiers and forget the threats of Obama. He has been trashed – it’s pay-back time!
        Pass the popcorn!

        • John Galt says:

          “This needs to all come out and Patraeus is just the soldier to do it – he has to remember the brotherhood he holds with his fellow soldiers and forget the threats of Obama. He has been trashed – it’s pay-back time!”

          Did he just temporarily forget all that brotherhood stuff when he was telling Congress that the video was the reason for the Benghazi attack on the first go round?

    • texan59 says:

      A little background on Acting Driector Morell. Look who he used to do business with every morning. As in Daily Briefing.

    • recoverydotgod says:

      Breaks my heart.

      Amb. Rice seemed very comfortable recounting the narrative in the Ohio State University Lantern interview. The narrative did not sound like CIA talking points, it sounded more like….well fictional narrative. The narrative just rolled off the tongue so easily. Guess that is preferred in a lying.

      Ambassador Rice attended as a representative of the US the return of the remains of the fallen to Andrews Air Force Base. I would hope that those that represent Americans in those very sacred time face it in truth, and if not I would hope that Americans hold those accountable that don’t represent that sacred time in truth.

      SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you very much, Chaplain. Mr. President, Mr. Vice President, Secretary Panetta, Ambassador Rice, Secretary Powell and Mrs. Powell, family members of the four patriots and heroes we bring home, members of the State Department family, ladies and gentlemen, today we bring home four Americans who gave their lives for our country and our values. To the families of our fallen colleagues, I offer our most heartfelt condolences and deepest gratitude….

    • arkansasmimi says:

      SD, this is EXACTLY what FOX News is reporting today after Gen P testified today. SO Thankful I found this site earlier this yr!!!

  4. waltherppk says:

    Military persons of the rank of those involved here in this debacle are not simply “handled” as if the were mindless furniture to be arranged in the schemes of politicians ……that isn’t the specilaty of their line of work ….killing people is.

  5. Keep one important fact in mind…
    Liberalism is the all-important, ruling doctrine now in America.
    It has taken 100 years to get the toehold it presently has both in society and in the government.
    Powerful forces won’t let -anyone- jeopardize that… not. even. its. figurehead. President.

  6. bob e says:

    i wait until the last moment each day to log on here.
    you guys & gals make it so exciting…i mean very exciting..
    isn’t it great to see barry hold a news conference without his telepronters..
    ya’ know he can’t tie his shoes without them..he eats it every time they ain’t around & i’m lovin’ it.
    thanks for all this clarity sundanceman..

    • I cannot identify him off the top of my head – also, from what I can determine the embedded security code for all graphic images (which includes photos) has been deleted from this picture so the origin is also unknown… odd.

    • cajunkelly says:

      Ali Ata?

    • Mikado Cat says:

      My first thought looking at the picture, nine years ago, Dr Scott Kelley, that would be too weird though.

      • ottawa925 says:

        I like to play detective and just listening to some music and putzing around looking for info. I’m looking for picture of Daniel S. Mahru to see if it’s a match. Mahru was partner of Tony Rezko and he was to be sentenced after the election .. today in fact is the day he was supposed to be sentenced, 11/15. Not one article about it, however previous opinion pieces think he will get probation after making deal with DOJ to keep his silence on what he knows about Obama/Valerie Jarrett, etc. The more I read this stuff I just keep asking myself … and this is America? The mystery man looks middle eastern to me. Sooo, I don’t think Kelley. Anyway, can you believe NO PICTURES of MAHRU. I find that hard to believe. Also, there is a website that you can upload a picture and it will search for a match. It’s called No match on the mysteryman with Bush picture. Well, I’m not going to drive myself nuts, and I don’t want you to go through anymore trouble either. Hit a brick wall and will just have to wait it out till ilp2p discloses who it is. Just put mystery man’s photo on the Wanted Poster and pin it up where you can keep checking. Thanks guys …. and gals !

    • lovemygirl says:

      He is a lawyer by all appearances. Perhaps the one that leaked Ryan’s divorce papers so O would win the IL Senate.

    • ctdar says:

      Someone tied to Blago & JJJr so I bet he will be tied to Obama which is reason why info has been scrubbed

      • lovemygirl says:

        I’ve searched a bit, maybe I’ll stop by my local barbershop and see if he is mob connected. My barber grew up in those neighborhoods and the stories are half the reason I go there. ;)

    • Mikado Cat says:

      Next guess, Jay Levine of the Chicago Tribune, now I think the cbs station.

    • If you are still wondering who this is. I *think* it might be Salam al-Marayati, president of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC). The pic you have is several years old, but it appears to be al-marayati.

      If that helps.

  7. John Galt says:

    “The consistent lies and outright scheming from the Obama White House are about to reach sunlight.”

    Nothing will happen to Zero. Obamammunity applies.

    • lovemygirl says:

      Not to be negative but the opposition and their supporters do not care about integrity or truth. They only care about themselves and winning.

    • marie says:

      The media, the derision of them growing, have to pretend there’s really “nothing to see here.”

    • dreamerspirit says:

      I am still in the learning process here. How is it possible for Obama to continually get access to sealed records, but his own vast history is one long laundry list of sealed records that no one seems to be able to penetrate? His Presidential records are set to be sealed as well.

  8. lovemygirl says:

    QUESTION: Why Did Jack Ryan Drop Out of Illinois Senate Race in 2004 (which paved the way for Obama’s rise)

    Read more

    • Knuckledraggingwino says:

      This is why I believe that the rise of Obama to the Presidency is Seven-of-Nine’s fault.

      Remember that Obama became a US Senator after Jack Ryan dropped out of the Senate race.

      Ryan dropped out because he was embarrassed by the release (illegal) f confidential divorce records.

      The divorce records were embarrassing because they included the allegations by his former wife, Jeri Ryan, of a visit to a sex club where Mrs Ryan refused Mr Ryan’s request tom perform a sex act in public.

      Jeri Ryan is an actress who played the character orSeven-of-Nine in the series Star Trek Voyager.

      May be Admin could post a photo of Jeri Ryan to illustrate?

  9. My Prediction: Petraeus will tell the truth – he will correct his prior testimony, he knew all along al-Qaeda was the impetus for the attacks.

    However, the “cover” per se’ will be the CIA connection to the State Dept. He, out of an abundance of caution, followed the White House instruction to diminish the CIA aspect to the narrative of the actual operation.

    In response the White House will fall back on their CIA cover story. We removed the al-Qaeda element from openly informing the American people because of the sensitivity of covert operations on the ground in Libya. In short – we told that which we felt we could comfortably state while we assessed the intelligence risks to operatives, assets and operations still in play.

    Would you buy it? Will the sheeple?

    • marie says:

      Yes, the sheeple will buy it, in the “I really don’t want to know the truth” thing….because, as their votes last election day showed, they are only “in it” (this “democracy”) for what they can’t get from it. A majority of Americans feel no sense of responsibility for protecting other Americans who serve them, no sense of of responsibility for protecting the Constitution and the nation it seeks to preserve.

    • John Galt says:

      “Will the sheeple?”

      The sheeple could care less about Benghazi. Doesn’t even register with them.

      • dreamerspirit says:

        We care about our nation and invest a significant amount of time and resources in an effort to preserve, protect and enhance what we believe is in the best interest of the United States of America. Unfortunately, IMO we are a minority.

        Your average citizen today for whatever reason does not seem to have an interest in what is happening. They may catch a few headlines on their homepage as they sign in to Email, Facebook or Twitter, but until something slaps them in the face or wallet, they just go about their lives, immune to the train wreck that is headed their way. Then when something does happen that impacts them they are clueless as to why it did and will believe whomever controls the narrative and right now that is POTUS and the MSM by far. They lack the will, initiative or desire to look any further than what they are spoon fed.

    • waltherppk says:

      Speaking for myself I’m not buying any part of it. I’m not even buying that the job performance of Petraeus or the Lt. Colonel Intel Officer he was shaggiing was adversely affected by said shagging ….heck the improvement in blood oxygen supply may have made them both geniuses on the job and the fact is neither one of them could have cared less until somebody else made it a political issue. I seriously doubt either one of those people are intimidated and on the contrary are probably highly pissed and looking forward to some payback to the b effers who are trying to crucify them. People who think they are humiliated and embarrassed and stuff don’t understand the mind of professional killers and that is exactly what those two people are…..but hey they are our killers …you know they ply their trade in our hire …they work for the United States. The entire “ses scandal” aspect of this scenario is a manufactured propaganda story…including more than probably the whole “surprised wife / unknowing spouses” angle. The whole angle on that is to make ordinary people try to relate the circumstances to their own normal lives …..forgetting entirely that these are not ordinary people living ordinary lives and “different rules” for “normal” absolutely apply IMO. The whole “soap opera” aspect of the “sex scandal” is pure propaganda theater and so is the “blackmail security risk” angle ….IMO it is all total specious crap that is calculated to “sound plausible” to ordinary people. I’m not buying any of it. Zero, zilch, nada. It’s a dog and pony show scripted completely from the White House….all of it.

      • dreamerspirit says:

        I agree with Walther. I have not bought the affair story for reason of his resignation from the beginning. What did he do, just wake up one day and grow a conscience? Oh, and his little epiphany just happened to occur a few days after the election even though the affair was known about before he took the CIA office position? I do not care how honorably he served or how sterling his reputation is, we are comparing apples and oranges here. He was played and when he was no longer of use, he was disposed of; just like those in Benghazi. The Disposition Matrix at work.

    • gretchenone says:

      Ah, but why no rescue?

      Every lie told has its own succeeding set of questions…

    • recoverydotgod says:

      The people will buy it as long as their is no opposition leader that can reframe the narrative. Once the bell is Gov. Palin says.

      Gen. Petraeus needs to do what he can by telling the truth, chips fall where they may for him. Hopefully a political opposition leader will step forward and pierce the shield of the media.

      Reframing the narrative for me partly has to do with pointing out the fact that if the personal representative of the President of the United States can only depend on hard-to-vet local militia for protection in the line of duty, what makes anyone else think that their son or daughter, grandson or granddaughter would be afforded better security if they served. Is leading from behind restated as leaving people behind?

      Also, the House Select Intelligence Committee needs to come out with a timeline for the American people.

    • John Galt says:

      “My Prediction: Petraeus will tell the truth – he will correct his prior testimony, he knew all along al-Qaeda was the impetus for the attacks.”

      So if he has to correct his prior testimony, does that mean that he previously lied to Congress? Isn’t that a crime?

  10. Mikado Cat says:

    Brief look at news, claim they are investigating Patraeus using “cia” resources for affair.

    What still keeps coming into my mind is that we have never been told what was going on, why the security was substandard, and what happened in the whitehouse during the attack, what actions did they take.

    • jordan2222 says:

      If a video exists in which the WH watched, one would think that would seal the fate of those who were there.

      • dreamerspirit says:

        I predict it will be sealed and Classified as “Top Secret” and the steeple will be told it is necessary to protect our continuing support of the fragile developing “democracy” (spit) in that area. We will be told tapes from within the consulate were too damaged by smoke to process. Aside from protecting POTUS reelection efforts, the so called delay/stall tactics in the White House investigation has been used to give them time to determine what will be released, what will be redacted, what will be classified as “Top Secret”, etc. When the White House wants to put out a story just look at how fast all the details of Patraeus’ resignation have unfolded.

    • John Galt says:

      “What still keeps coming into my mind is that we have never been told what was going on, why the security was substandard, and what happened in the whitehouse during the attack, what actions did they take.”

      Zero will instead occupy the sheeple with glorious illusions of free stuff paid for by taxing the rich.

  11. Pingback: #Benghazi: Lies, Lies and More Damned Lies | Lady Liberty 1885

  12. west1890 says:

    Will his testimony endanger his wife’s job at the wonderful, Dodd-Frank created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. . .you know, the one that fauxcahontas Elizabeth Warren used to oversee?
    “Obama Administration Gave Petraeus’s Wife a $187,605-Per-Year Job”

  13. recoverydotgod says:

    In the ABC This Week interview with Jake Tapper on the Sunday show 9/16, Amb. Rice stayed on watered down talking points early almost verbatim…opening statement so to speak.. but later under tougher questioning didn’t. @4:20 She unequivocally stated “let’s be clear about what transpired here” that Benghazi was a “direct result” of the video. She got defensive and went off on her own. I’d like to ask her, what talking points did she prefer…the watered down version or her own?

  14. brocahontas says:

    The problem is that Obama’s minions don’t care about the truth. They don’t care if Obama lies. They are brain washed acolytes.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s